TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

smiley17111711 Archive

View 1 post and 86 comments by smiley17111711 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's how it is in CA. I've dealt with it myself.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 08:30 PM
2

Another aspect of violence that most people do not acknowledge is that women and girls are so privileged that they usually do not have to commit their own violence. They can simply incite men to violence. Sometimes called "catspawing". The majority of male violence against men is incited by women who pull the puppet strings of men with no rights. That is why violent crime rates are so outrageous in the ghettos. Because almost all of the homes are headed by women, and the rights of fathers have b…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 04:29 PM
3

No, as long as you have a record, it counts. But you might still need an attorney to make the court go by the book. They can just trample your rights, if you dont have one. If the County is just now trying to start collecting, send your records to the County worker. They should correct it on their own. But if they don't, scare up enough money for a lawyer.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:14 AM
2

They insist they shouldn't be "forced" to care for a child. But they have no problem with enslaving men and forcing them to provide for them for like.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:54 AM
2

Might look into a civil suit.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:47 AM
1

Might look into a civil suit.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:47 AM
1

"You stay home, honey, I'm gonna' earn six figures and fix the car on Sunday. Order something nice from the internet, if you want, here's my card."
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:43 AM
1

Perfect time to modify custody and support. Each county courthouse has a self help desk. Forms are also online now. I'd download forms and then go in and utilize the self help desk with questions. If you haven't seen him in 13 years, hire a professional supervisor and attend a couple visits. It's true that the point is to humiliate you. But you can overcome it and get a fair custody order. Assuming the supervisor's notes are positive, attach them to your motion for week on week off parenting tim…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:39 AM
1

Faced with the horror of paying child support, she sold his kid, instead.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:52 AM
12

Her life matters, though.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:39 AM
2

Another disparity that no one ever mentions is that if you consider the number of orgasms, instead of the number of occasions on which the woman has an orgasm, heterosexual women have many times the number of orgasms men have. Most women have about four times the number of orgasms their male partners have. And for many women, it's ten or twenty times more. Both the mean and the median number are many times higher for straight women than for men. That doesn't mean it's unfair to men. It's a physi…
/r/MensRights28/02/24 08:20 PM
8

Once a woman is given an order of sole custody, the chances of the child being abused skyrocket.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 08:02 PM
1

She needs to have a job and your assets need to be off the books in the hands of a trusted relative or stashed somewhere. She's been planning to divorce rape you for years, so she's way ahead of you on planning. If there are kids, custody needs to be your top priority. She moves out, not you.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:40 AM
1

Multiply that by 100 million kids.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:33 AM
1

What's crazy is a family law judge in TX took one look at this woman, who was obviously a violent psychopath, and gave her a custody order. That's what excluded the child's father from doing anything to protect his son. That's why his son was brought to this woman's church shooting rampage. She wanted the kid to go out with her. Absolutely anyone could tell this was a violent, dangerous woman who would stop at nothing to get revenge. Yet, along came a family law judge, who gave her a child. If t…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:31 AM
1

Women work fewer hours, and as a result, are paid fewer dollars. That's hardly an injustice. What's an injustice is that almost all of the spending is done by women, despite women doing only a tiny fraction of the earning.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:17 AM
2

Don't give the mainstream media your money, ever. Especially Hollywood or their ilk.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:14 AM
2

It's interesting that it has always been possible to tell biological sex from a person's written words. People have observed that for centuries. Even without handwriting, with typed words, the distinction is almost always obvious. Even on subjects that seem neutral. You can almost always tell whether an author is male or female. Some other things I've noticed- you can usually tell whether a car is the regular car of a man or woman, without seeing the person inside it. And if you see the stuff on…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 11:01 AM
2

It's because feminism can be applied to only certain segments of the population, not to every segment of the population. The reasoning is that they can apply feminism to the populations they want to oppress, because they know it will make them failures, but they can exempt other populations from feminism, and those populations will prosper over the ones that have to live under feminism. A good example would be discrimination in the work place. Obviously, if two populations compete against each o…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 10:45 AM
6

What's crazy is fathers are the only people capable of deterring child molesters. Kids are inherently at risk anywhere women are unsupervised with kids. Women without fathers there to supervise them are always a breeding ground for molesters. Everywhere. Every molester is looking for one thing- a woman with a custody order that keeps father away. So they won't be at risk while grooming a kid. It's practically impossible to molest a kid without that. An even more ideal setting for a molester is a…
/r/MensRights21/02/24 10:14 AM
1

Almost all women associated with domestic violence activism / family law litigation are violent abusers. Women who make allegations of domestic violence are almost 100% violent abusers, themselves. They simply use allegations as one more tactic of abuse. And then lesbian relationships have astronomical rates of domestic violence, because both partners are female. Mary J Blige had a domestic violence shelter named after her in NY the same week she was recorded on video violently assaulting her bo…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 11:04 AM
1

Gender bias wins cases for women. Emotions have nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:53 AM
2

Giving custody orders to women has been a complete disaster for western civilization. The minute a custody order is made to a female parent, the child's odds of every single negative outcome skyrocket. The child is more than 20 times as likely to be molested. The child is 13 times as likely to be incarcerated. The child is many times more likely to abused and to abuse drugs and alcohol and drop out of school and have teen pregnancies. Custody orders to women are absolute disasters. They are abso…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:52 AM
3

When you cultivate boys, foremost, the girls also do better. They see all the positive attention the boy gets for physical and mental achievement, and they try to rise to the same level, to gain the same esteem as boys. Just playing with them is enough to get them started. Doing things, making things, accomplishing things.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:46 AM
1

These laws have nothing to do with children. It's simply slavery. It's forcing men to pay their wives to run around with other men. This is why English own less than half the property in England. Englishmen are forced to pay their wives to cheat on them. Obviously, their families will never have lasting wealth, under those conditions. Foreigners, who don't have to live under those conditions will continue to dominate them. Already, foreigners own the majority of their property. Simply because fo…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:41 AM
4

Women who do this usually get rewarded by a family law judge. Her husband will have to pay her to cheat with other guys. Women like this live in a world without consequences. But for everyone else involved, their lives will be marred forever.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:32 AM
1

If you don't have kids yet, you can get out now with a small profit. Then you can get started on a happy family for your kids with a little nest egg. But once you have a kid with her, you're trapped forever, and so is the innocent child. Your future kids need you to act, to give them a happy life. If you have kids already, then it's much more complicated. You have to get them out, with you. Custody is all that matters. But if you don't have kids, you have a good position. Start paying attention …
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:26 AM
2

That's relevant if they have kids, otherwise, it won't help her much.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 10:13 AM
1

She could be making up the pregnancy or trying to pin it on him, just because she didn't like the other dad.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:41 PM
3

Equal rights is often said to be "far-right" by the media. But that is only because they know that equality is a threat to them. Equal rights are neither right nor left.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:35 PM
3

Most slavery today works much like slavery in the past. There's a buyer and a seller, both are corrupt and exploitative, and there is a huge gender disparity, that always works in such a way that most men are exploited, but the standard of living of women, and of a tiny minority of men at the top, is improved.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:33 PM
0

When people benefit from unjust social privilege, they have to protect their privilege, because it is not justifiable. So they are hostile to anyone who speaks the obvious truth. What you're doing would be comparable to me going to Saudi Arabia and explaining their aristocrats were not actually appointed by God to rule them. Everyone would know it was true, but it would be dangerous to say it,
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:23 PM
2

"My mom found out, oh no, he must have raped me."
/r/MensRights04/02/24 04:10 PM
44

My first observation was that it never occurred to her that cheating on him was the reason he was disgusted by her. She tried to characterize the cheating incident as something she couldn't possibly be blamed for. But if you just read between the lines, it seems very likely she merely used the turn of language you always hear on feminist subreddits, in which she transformed the incident from "I got drunk and cheated on him" into "I was sexually assaulted". For any normal guy, the cheating would …
/r/MensRights04/02/24 03:47 PM
93

Most of what is said on feminist subreddits would sound psychopathic, if you swapped the genders. "You deserve a woman who worships your penis."
/r/MensRights04/02/24 03:42 PM
104

For men facing false allegations, these are both examples of good advice. In most cases, impossible to disprove an allegation of rape that is made after consensual sex. And the obvious way in which doubt can be cast on such an allegation, by exposing the accuser's past history of using false allegations and predatory sexual relationships, is usually excluded as evidence. That is why evidence that contradicts any detail of the allegation is important, no matter how small the detail. If there is a…
/r/MensRights04/02/24 03:14 PM
1

Enforced by males, of course.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 11:49 PM
8

If you have kids with her, custody needs to be top priority. And moving her out. Hopefully you don't have kids, but if you do, you don't want her around the kids. Custody is the biggest gamepiece, if you do. You can mail in two q tips to test paternity. You don't have to demand a test from her. If you have the ability to hide assets, that's better. Take all money out of any account she has access to. HELOCs also, that's a common female tactic is raid everything. Do that before you let on you kno…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:33 AM
13

Pussy pass: granted
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:21 AM
1

They literally count complaining on instagram as "labor" just like laying brick or loading trucks.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:46 PM
7

And yet, if you offer to switch roles- let the women work overtime and pay all bills, Pay a mortgage, buy the man cars and anything he wants, and give the man $2000 to spend on recreation every month, they would never take it. "That's different- I could never make that kind of money." Yeah, because you have no job skills.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:44 PM
8

They're really just counting everything they do for recreation as "labor". Like, they go spend their husband's earnings at a mall, then they have to organized the stuff they bought at the mall, and they call it all "labor". They also believe they have no duty of any kind to their own kids. They should be paid to tend to children. "If you had to hire a babysitter, you'd have to pay them!" But they can't even grasp the notion that they have just as much of a duty as the father has. When the father…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:40 PM
7

I guarantee she used false allegations to take the children from their real fathers, also. False allegations made in criminal court are bad enough. But there are constitutional protections in criminal court. In family law, the burden of proof does not exist, there is no right to any kind of hearing or access to a court, and the presumption is always guilt, for men. A lot of misguided people out there might think it is better to err "on the side of caution" with false allegations. But this is a g…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:33 PM
66

It amazes me that so many workplaces tolerate women acting this way. You could report them. They would hate you, but you could do it. It's a hostile work environment. HR only cares about minimizing company liability, so they would probably tell them to stop talking about how much cum they get blasted on their faces by random dudes. Probably no penalty, but some humiliation would serve them right. It's kind of disgraceful you'd have to be the asshole and explain that it's not appropriate. But tha…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 09:58 PM
17

Most adult women in the United States know what HPV is, but are unaware that the purpose of a Pap smear is to test for a contagious STD called HPV. They think the purpose is "to see if they have cancer, some women get cancer." They think it is completely luck of the draw whether women get cervical cancer. They actually think their behavior has nothing to do with it, and they are unaware it comes from an STD. The medical establishment actually gave up on trying to explain it to women. A typical w…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 07:41 PM
9

Allocation of taxpayer medical resources to women is one of the more egregious examples of economic injustice toward men. Women collect many, many times the resources men collect, and men pay many, many times the price. This is one more example of the even broader injustice.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 07:32 PM
3

Maybe this is just the male logic center of my left brain talking, but doesn't it seem like cervical cancer caused by a viral vector STD could be eliminated being by women reducing the number of sex partners going bareback on them? I'm sure women have some explanation why that makes no sense, but I just can't grasp it.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:42 PM
1

DV shelters are literally child kidnapping outfits that help violent, abusive women kidnap children and traffick and exploit them. Children in a DV shelter are almost guaranteed to be physically and sexually abused. Almost 100% of the women in those places are violent abusers. Once the father is eliminated, the abuse inevitably escalates toward the child. Most of the female children at a DV shelter will be turned out and pimped within a few years of a visit to a DV shelter. They are basically up…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:55 AM
4

It does sound like the ultimate in condescension. It would be comparable to publishing a paper on African Americans who campaigned for abolition, and identifying the"thinking errors" that are causing their problems, and could lead them down a "dangerous road". And not mentioning slavery even once. Clearly, one does use that kind of rhetoric about someone for whom they have the most basic respect.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:35 AM
2

Fundraisers have invariably found that when you're hitting up people or governments or bureaucrats for money, you never want to ask on behalf of men or children. You always want to ask on behalf of women. It's a pervasively held prejudice that women are more deserving. So when you write a grant proposal or ask for money for research, or taxpayer aid for anything else, you always want the word "women" to appear right at the top. That's also why academic groups try to always include a female name …
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:24 AM
9

In the United States, whether you are charged for committing a murder, and what penalty you receive for murder, depend mostly on your demographic information.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 07:35 AM
8

Men in the workforce are being run over, electrocuted, crushed, shot, and chopped up every single day. But that's not a concern to the government. If women have feelings, then that's 15 times more important than the concerns of men, at least, if budget size can be used as an indication of importance.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 07:21 AM
4

Men in the United States grow up knowing you never turn your back on a woman with a running engine.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 07:14 AM
28

They are actually saying that being entitled is an inherently female characteristic. Not only that, they are saying it is shameful to have characteristics that are associated with women. They are saying women can have those characteristics, because they are inherently less competent than men, but for men to have the same characteristics is shameful.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 02:42 AM
15

Honestly, it's probably the best thing that could happen to him, because otherwise he could have continued to put up that scamming lowlife scumbag.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:00 PM
13

There's a little truth to this- feminist policies have created millions of homes headed by female parents, and as a result, the youth being raised in those homes are incredibly violent. But they're surprisingly violent toward women. The difference is astonishing. If a woman is violently attacked by some psychopath, it's practically guaranteed to be one of these products of single mother homes / decades feminist policies. Boys and men raised in these super feminist environments have zero respect …
/r/MensRights15/01/24 05:30 PM
1

Yeah, an assault by a man against a woman is guaranteed to be investigated by police. And also, the untrue allegation of an assault is guaranteed to be investigated. And also, words are assault, under most of our laws, if the words are directed at a woman. When the police investigate such an allegation, if they can't pin a charge on the man, it still gets recorded as an assault on a woman, even when the investigation determines it was actually an assault on a man. An interesting demonstration wa…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 04:09 PM
7

This is incredibly typical of female abusers. Female abusers don't use brute force on their victims, because they have a disadvantage in brute force. So they rarely kill or beat or rape their male victims. Instead, they use slander to attack their reputation. Also the tactic they use on other women. Also, notice, women keenly understand that there is a type of female status that goes with the ability to reject men. They gain status among other women by rejecting men. So a false accusation can be…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:02 PM
43

They demand informed consent for themselves. But deny the same right to others. Sounds like every feminist I've ever heard of.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 08:51 PM
3

There was a good study that shows that women commit more domestic violence, and also that women almost always initiate domestic violence. If I get a break, I’ll try and find it. Basically, men sometimes defend themselves, and sometimes even retaliate, but men almost never initiate violence, it’s almost always women. It’s true that women have to meet certain social expectations, to be successful, but not nearly as many as men have to meet. Men also have act differently around men, and around wome…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 05:00 PM
1

They’re also counting intact families as families headed by a father.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:46 AM
5

No prob. It’s the kind of case where the prosecutor would offer him a deal with very little jail time, and it will be an agonizing decision, because they will try to mar his record with sex offender registration. Are they holding him, or is he out on bail? Do you know the maximum penalty if he is convicted?
/r/MensRights14/01/24 12:01 AM
15

Governments have adopted the theory of “social” justice. It means that certain groups collectively share guilt or innocence, usually by virtue of their color or other demographic information. In that way, it’s different from ordinary “justice”, where individuals bear guilt or innocence, based on their actions and circumstances. If you’re a prosecutor in one of these offices, you want to advance your career. You don’t do that by prosecuting a violent psychopath who jumps out of the bushes with kn…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 11:43 PM
2

Psych degrees are basically the easiest degree anyone can get. In the US, they don’t even require any analytical work. That’s why millions of women get them. It’s a field where someone can rely on their husband’s income and work two hours a week, and say they have a job, just like this lady was doing. If you actually wanted mental health services, I don’t see how a female counselor could help you. It’s just a totally different practice. It’s like going to a dentist for a busted arm, or something…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 09:25 PM
73

“Oops, I must have forgotten to take the pill!”
/r/MensRights13/01/24 08:40 PM
16

Correct. They arrive at these numbers by counting things like, “Did a man ever ask you out, when you weren’t interested?”
/r/MensRights13/01/24 08:38 PM
11

No, these are total bullshit, they’ve been debunked over and over. They relied on bad data and total speculation. Like, they used a survey where they asked women if they’d been raped, and if the respondent said no, they changed it to yes, because they figure the women have been raped, but they just don’t realize it. HHS collects data to on child abuse and murder. By far the most likely person to be abuse or kill a child is their mother, followed by their mother in concert with her new boyfriend …
/r/MensRights13/01/24 08:36 PM
4

There is no question that having a psychotic mother who brought in molesters would cause gender confusion and homosexuality. That’s almost always how it happens. Hope you can get some kind on justice.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 03:52 AM
6

Women receive a well documented sentencing discount for all types of crimes. Additionally, they receive a prosecution discount, for example, if a man and woman commit the same crime, they almost always offer the woman no penalty as long as she rolls over on the man. For example, when a woman lets her new boyfriends molest her kids, the woman is almost never prosecuted. Same when women kill their kids. They almost always let them go and prosecute the new boyfriend. Additionally, the whole concept…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 11:10 PM
0

I apologize I did not have time to find the study, but I will try later. I actually had to get a kid and get them in bed just now. I am most certainly familiar with this subject. Everything from housing costs to hospital bills. Much of what you are saying is either incorrect or you’re making incorrect inferences based on special population samples, instead of random samples. Everyone who has been triggered by what I said did the same thing: “that’s not true, because someone I know…” Hospital bir…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:41 AM
2

In terms of personal finances of these households, what happens is that people who don’t have kids also buy larger houses as their earnings go up. So having fewer kids or no kids doesn’t affect their spending. Basically, no one ever buys a larger house to accommodate a child. The child utilizes what they already own. Also, spending patterns change. There is a slightly higher grocery bill, but they eat at restaurants less often, for example. Consumption of booze and drugs and party lifestyle tend…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 01:07 AM
0

If I get time, I’ll find you the study. No, people do not buy larger houses for their kids. There is extensive data on it. Government studies with data on millions of households.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 12:57 AM
1

It is absurd to propose that a child increases your expenses by 60%. A child does not increase household expenses at all. Because children live in the same house as their parents. Costs are completely unchanged by having a child.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 12:55 AM
-1

There is extensive data on this subject. Household expenses are unchanged by having kids. Completely unchanged. People with kids spend exactly the same amount they spent before they had kids.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 12:51 AM
3

It’s mostly because of sexism at all levels of education. It’s also proven that more attractive girls receive higher grades, and that that bias was eliminated by online classes, and more attractive girls lost their advantage. So it’s mostly sexism and favoritism and looksism, not harder work. Which is proven by the test scores. If it was harder work, it would also translate to higher scores.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 07:31 PM
2

She didn’t want a cat. She wanted to inflict harm on someone who was stupid enough to be nice to her.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 08:01 PM
3

Yep. That’s the typical marriage today in the modern west. Because of no-fault divorce laws, a married woman today is able to keep her husband locked into his marital obligation to her, through alimony / “community” property laws / so called “child” support laws. But at the same time, she is freed from any of her obligations under the marriage contract. She can be unfaithful with 100 other guys, and she has no housekeeping or child care duties. But she still gets all of the benefits of being mar…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 04:39 PM
12

Yeah, there needs to be way more attention paid to female violence, and the way women get away with it. The Depp trial was good, because it showed how Mr. Depp went to lengths to conceal his wife’s many violent crimes, even lying about serious injuries, even when common sense dictated he should not have done that. She was able to exploit his instinct to help her escape accountability, at all costs to himself. Once she realized that, she knew she could get away with anything.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:36 PM
5

It sounds like the number one reason was women playing the field with 100 different guys, but this was the best they could word it.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:17 PM
13

Trans shooter manifesto = reddit community guidelines
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:10 PM
20

Part of the problem with domestic violence is men always have the mindset of protecting women from consequences. So to men, it seems unthinkable to turn them over to the police. But women know that. That’s why abuse from women is basically impossible to end by talking to them. They know their victims would never stop helping them. You have to turn them over and let her face consequences for her actions.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:01 PM
2

Figure out how to hide assets, get her to work, get him to retire, and then surprise her with divorce papers. It’s also incredibly easy to get DVRO against her. Abusive words are enough. Then he gets the house and she hits the skids. He should have bars of gold hidden away, that she can’t find and sue him for. He should pull money out of the home’s equity and hide it in gold. If she has a job, and he doesn’t, that helps him.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 02:39 AM
27

She left modern readers with a valuable testament, about gender inequality, that should be used to inform policy, even though she didn’t survive the experiment, herself. Many of the trailblazing scientists of history had to sacrifice themselves for knowledge. She did the same, for Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 02:32 AM
2

Edited to include Nevada County, CA
/r/MensRights09/01/24 12:02 AM
5

Women protect women abusers, generally speaking. Protecting children is a male concern, by nature.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:00 PM
1

Makeup and appearance are mostly a matter of their status in female hierarchies. Men don’t have much to do with how they operate. But men are at least exempted from female hierarchies. That is, men don’t have to compete for status within those hierarchies. But that hardly means men have it easier in some way. Men have to compete in the much more competitive male hierarchies. And women are exempted from that much more brutal competition.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 07:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter