TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

smm8880088 Archive

View 2 posts and 243 comments by smm8880088 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It's as if these news and media organizations are now understanding that they can basically use misandry to their benefit out in the open freely because of the social climate of feminism. And you'd then have people come in here and say thst feminism and misandrists aren't the same, and yet I barely see any feminists in number say anything against these sorts or articles, which by the way, articles like the one posted here aren't anything new under the sun. I mean, it's The Guardian, after all.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:26 AM
2

How is saying that one gender gets less attention and care a form of loathing women here?
/r/MensRights16/06/24 03:52 AM
1

He's using his wordings in a way to bring out himself to others here, so I'm not sure why you're laughing at him doing just that. You could say that the social atmosphere of our modern world, especially in the west, has a niche for the benefits of women more or less than men.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 03:48 AM
1

Women and children need to be protected at all costs, so there's your answer. The blame is on humanity at large having more of a preference for women, so you could say that you're getting more benefits than what ever oppression you guys are going through. And if anything, even if women were brought into a 3rd World War, you and other women will just be in assistance positions, nursing aids, and other less dire things. Women aren't meant for combat, and feminist movies and cinema aren't based on …
/r/MensRights16/06/24 03:42 AM
7

You're another one, lmao Women in reality want masculine men, not effeminate guys.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 03:37 AM
5

That's your own assessment. Your discussions are somehow all about that, honestly. And you somehow must think it's a form misogyny to be offended being seen as worse than an animal to women online, but would defend the word "female" being said in the form of a noun. You also made the assumption that there's barely any woman on here, and being that this sub has been around for more than a decade, I'm sure you're quite informed about the demographics here, Doctor. But you aren't. You're just here …
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:33 PM
3

Are you thinking there's something wrong being sincelerly on a sub about men's rights?
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:15 PM
3

You're way more unbound here than I am. Men would love to listen to these women if they can for one day not base their fears on studies and their past problems with men. The fact that they are comparing a gender to an animal is already dehumanising, and yet saying the word "female" as a noun is questionable. What others as myself would suggest for these women is therapy or someone to discuss this with.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:07 PM
3

You said that the majority of the women are basing this on their feelings. While that is true, as women base things on feelings usually, this whole bear question is based on women's SA awareness. And from what I've seen, it's both hormonally and study based.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:57 PM
3

This doesn't escape me. Because it's fine to say this to a child, especially, to be safe around strangers, but to genuinely feel that said stranger could harm you and is basically worse than an animal is a phobia, in and of itself. The scenario in and of itself is gendered also. If we could combine both studies of harmful individuals who are men and women, then this holds better than saying one gender is bad. Because the strangers you're describing are human, sure it's reasonable since you're en…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:48 PM
4

And yet women across social media are doing just that. They're basing their androphobia on these studies of men being the the over all perpetrators of domestic abuse, or just abuse in general. This whole meme, or whatever you like to call it, is based on women's SA awareness, many women said something alluding to what I'm saying themselves. To actually brush this aside as just some emotional trauma is ignorance at best. Some women are doing this for the algorithm, some do however feel these thin…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:36 PM
3

More unsafe how, genius? Because a bear weighs about eight times more than some woman, even if that woman was 600 lbs herself, that's basically 600lbs of lard against a huge, omnivorous animal. The fact that a woman would see a human being as worse than an animal is already dehumanising, and yet dumbasses like you would complain here about guys calling a woman "female". You're far gone, Doctor.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:19 PM
3

But are you describing that most of these strangers are as harmful as a bear? The difference here is the discussion about potential abuse, and to say that a human who is much weaker, is less reasonable, and more dangerous than a bear is pure Darwinism.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:09 PM
6

You cannot disprove their androphobia? I'm sorry, what? Who the hell are you to say that a woman or a man is worse than some bear, because of SA studies or biological differences? This is how you've been throughout this whole sub since I saw you here. Absolutely pandering. You're just here to argue and actually make time out of your day to mess around with other guys here.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:06 PM
5

Random, unknown man? You mean the sorts of men some of these women meet on dating apps? They meet them in their secluded apartments? Rural places? After clubs? It would seem that the pervasive narrative here for these skanks is thst they'd rather prefer a handsome, well endowed man than some fugly guy from a Walmart. The bear you could say is the personified nomenclature of the men these women actually want. If men are si dsmn horrible to these women, why choose a creature made to efficiently su…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:53 PM
1

You know how modern women are so affected when they seemingly would refuse medical assistance in a place that has a main purpose to benefit them.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:02 PM
6

There's some guy here who basically said he's doing it for his daughter, who knows how old. Basically, he is coming in here specifically so that she doesn't grow up with misogyny surrounding her everyday life. As if I hadn't heard something like that before. This sub has around 400 thousand members. So, he has a lot of work to do. There's guys these days who usually surround themselves with some outlook of comic book heroism and thinking by being some male feminist they are somehow lessening the…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 09:27 PM
9

Yeah, be aware. There's some guys in here already, basically harassing others and doing just that. This sub attracts these individuals, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:30 PM
1

"Women will not take something for being a woman". I'm sorry, but this post seems like pandering all around the place. Just from this statement alone, you're saying women were and are just bullied for just being female. Sounds dumb af. This whole post seems artificial.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 05:30 PM
2

If I'm going to be fundamentally honest, most guys who subscribe to these ideologies should borrow some information from them and go on and use said information to their benefit. The thing is, I like some ideologies when they are humble and have their insights, but I'd rather be the one not to become some devout follower or anything and use these ideologies as a form of guidance.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 04:36 PM
7

They already have won. The cultural zeitgeist of feminism and women's rights have permeated throughout our modern day era. This isn't going to change anytime soon from the fact that women biologically are favored more, men are usually seen as disposable commodities, and women generally are seen as the weaker sex. Which is ironic, from the feminist mantras of being independent and worthy alongside men. And yet, women and feminists alike are usually in soft cushioned jobs and careers. Hopefully, t…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 04:25 PM
4

Ironic, coming from the same guy that just comes in here to argue and egg on. If you're going to be a soybean asshole, at least do this elsewhere where there isn't just a bunch of guys. You're literally just here to be an ass, I doubt you're on feminist subs "solving misandry". No, you people deliberately don't see misandry as a problem. Society at large dislikes men, sees us as oppressors. Read what the guy you responded to said about men's shelters preferring to be closed down, the amount of f…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 04:14 PM
3

I don't believe this is the issue at hand here. When it comes to gender, race, and sex, usually there's barely any awareness of men's problems. We aren't describing anything about army organizations or celebrating another country's independence. This is more focused on gender, sexual orientation, and health. Although, I would agree that there needs to be more holidays for veterans recognized in today's culture. So how is there less awareness for men's days / months, but more awareness for women'…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 03:51 PM
6

The video itself already has a bunch of male feminists arguing in the comments. Going all m' lady in there. This is why I feel that as long as there's a women are wonderful belief, then issues like this will not only be brushed aside, but men's issues would be taken less seriously as always because of guys like this specifically. Remember, feminism was originally helped from men and to this day funded by men.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 03:33 PM
1

You barely can even formulate yourself respectfully without getting this upset over a common internet phrase you'll see here in men's spaces. That's what you're all upset about, honestly. Yes, "whataboutism" is a leftist mantra, and if anything I brought up whataboutism, if we want to get self evident here, because of how I rarely see any of you guys doing this stuff on female spaces as a whole in social media, not even just Reddit. No, you just guys just want to play some heroic role. This is h…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:13 PM
2

So, whataboutism? Got it. But that's not the question. I didn't ask what the rules are. I asked what denigrating women has to do with men's rights. What is the relationship there. Try, really hard, to answer my question, if you can. This is a men's rights sub, right? So maybe you shouldn't hide from questions about men's rights. This isn't a form of whataboutism. Lay off these leftist phrases on me and be genuine here or go off somewhere else. Disliking women or anything had nothing to do with m…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:54 PM
1

No, but you're pandering. Let me answer that with, Men's Rights doesn't have any rulings. Nor does feminism, at least that I'm aware of. You're simply just offended that women were involved, you're basically what the guts here would call a white knight. Why? Because you guys come in here with no basis but to protect women at all costs, while not giving two shits about whst goes on in female spaces as a whole. I know who or what you guys are. You're asking this because you lack the understanding …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:10 PM
4

Over sensitive? Hahaha. Jesus Christ. For a sub on Men's Rights, you bros are sure ready to turn on a man at a moment's notice for not hating women. So, you're not here for a genuine discussion. If you weren't so sensitive, as I said before, you wouldn't have been this hellbent on calling the guy basically ignorant himself without actually engaging in a conversation with him. Look at how you went off just in this response alone, who is more calm here, you or me? This is what some of you guys jus…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:59 PM
4

Yes, this is what you guys do. You call any sort of criticism about a woman as a form of bigotry. I could say that women are biologically or physically weaker than men, and you'd still get offended by that. So yes, you are pandering and are over sensitive. What's fascinating is that I barely see any of this sort of concern from you guys on feminist subs unless they end up banning you all then and there. Third, the sub is called "Men's Rights." Explain how this means we should openly hate women? …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:43 PM
3

Sure you did.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:38 PM
3

Um, I'd rather not.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:34 PM
6

The mass majority of women on social media and the Internet as a whole are either consumers, consumers of said social media, left leaning, feminists, or on fan websites. The overarching "self help" they receive panders to their feelings and basically pampers to their whims, let's just be honest here. We have the occasional e girl and gamer girl, and there are plenty of women on some on forums like this, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:30 PM
10

But you're acting like an ignoramus. I just don't understand what some you guys gain from pandering to women like this so much. It's as if it's a given that you'll naturally get offended when someone has something less positive to say about a woman, or the groups that they follow at the very least, especially if its coming from a man.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:23 PM
5

Re read my comment. This isn't really about my research abilities, this is about others' willful ignorance on the subject of female improvement, which is less accustomed to actual betterment and more so to do with a woman's outward appearance and self worth. Something that men had somehow caught up with, in a sense, these days.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:19 PM
7

Actually, to reiterate, no, I don't know all of them, but the majority of the content I've seen for them usually focuses more on bettering their appearances than say being better for a potential partner.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:09 PM
65

And yet they complain about being objectified on social media websites like Instagram and even on porn websites. This should also bring up how women in numbers absolutely dislike unattractive men giving them any sort of attention or advances. If all men looked like the guys from Abercrombie and Fitch, then we wouldn't have these issues with them complaining about objectification and men not being owed a relationship or sex. Or at least not be asked to approach women unless in some wholesome chur…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:02 PM
11

Honestly, they are basically using selective mating strategies subconsciously. Has anyone ever noticed how, generally, feminists dislike being in a marriage as a whole? Is this because of some patriarchal ruling, or is this because the men in question wanting marriages and relationships are unattractive or not so financially well off? Feminists are wholefully a women's group, women are biologically disgusted by ugly men, and men to them are invisible and unworthy of a relationship unless they do…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:46 PM
6

The only thing that matters. lmao
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:12 PM
4

Wait, were these self help guides focusing on their financial gains or dating strategies? Because from what I've seen on social media, women's self help guides usually stem from a form of self pampering and comfortable advice.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:11 PM
12

Sometimes acting is a form of expressing one's self. You should know that all too well since you're on here basically being a performance actor yourself.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:02 PM
11

It's true. Why then would they pamper themselves on social media? Why then are women less likely to change themselves for others beyond just make up tutorials and such? I could also bring up how women ignore misandry online because bringing down the sisterhood to women who aren't even feminists themselves is bad, but in some cases, some are too afraid to.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:59 PM
15

Self acceptance is good, but self improvement is about bettering yourself. Women on social media apparently don't understand or believe in that.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:54 PM
8

This answer should be too obvious to anyone out there who understands it. Men are less cared for by society as a whole unless we accomplish something within ourselves and our lives, more so than a young, attractive to decent looking girl. Women back then were offered marriage proposals and basically lived off their husband's income. If women wanted to these days, they could become housewives and abandon feminism's narratives of abandoning a 1950s household lifestyle. But that's a discussion for …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:50 PM
3

Feminism teaches women to be absolute scumbags on purpose to make them seem like they can be heard and also seem less vulnerable to the men that they're around. Again, how is feminism not a misandrist group in its dichotomy? Because the fact that women would rather be asshats and dog brains on social media nowadays because they feel that being nurturing and feminine is a weakness says more about them than our problems.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:23 PM
6

On almost any part of social media, misandry and progressivism are the norm. YouTube is part of a big tech company. Such a company is basically run and used by the progressive leaning. Why would you see the default videos on YouTube showing late night show hosts who are also left leaning and share their opinions of current affairs on society? YouTube is part of this conglomerate, and I'm more or less surprised that they've been allowing some form of red pill content on their platform as of late,…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:02 PM
1

What the hell are you saying right now? There's a difference between social media and real life, and most of these women and some men alike want this attention. The algorithm should be their concern because it picks up on their profiles and distributes them to anyone who has a functioning body. This ambient you're making sounds just as meaningless as getting upset at the word "female". Yes, getting a monsoon of DMs must be stressful, but this all sounds like selective outrage. And no this isn't …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 08:04 AM
1

Bro what are you saying
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:56 AM
1

You're so, or you seem so, how do I say this in the nicest way possible, hurt. That sub is a misandrist shit hole, and even their evidences aren't that objectifying. Incel Tears had better credibility. But the guys on those websites could use therapeutic assistance more so than being the circus show on a female subreddit. Next thing you're going to say is that the Boys are Quirky sub has good credible evidences of misogyny also.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:52 AM
1

Why should you care about saying one of the most harmless words in the English language to be seen as creepy by other women? Then find those women who aren't so hellbent over a harmless word with barely any historical significance.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:43 AM
2

they certainly aren't trying to get DMs from insta creeps. So them showing their asses and breasts aren't an invitation. I really don't like when women say this, most women on social media objectify themselves, the algorithm picks up their account information, and spreads their photos online for everyone to see. These women are clearly advertising themselves in one way or another, that'd whst gets the attention of the algorithm, then a bunch of guys start listing after some woman, and we now hav…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:38 AM
1

He could be some adolescent. What does that have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:29 AM
1

By who, your past boyfriends? What did you do or say that made guys call you these things, I never called you a creature, by the way, which meant that I dislike you or something. We are creatures, we are animals, i use these things in a way that describes humans, not just women. It's not that serious. And, by the way, even if this is the case, then maybe women need to spend less time on the Internet, since most men (or everybody else) constantly sexually objectifies them to almost no end where t…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:25 AM
1

And you 100 percent trust these findings? If women online need to stop showing themselves, then they are allowed to do so, but the monsoon of female made sexually objectionable accounts a way more than one percent. You're acting as if women are more pure than men are, really, throughout this whole goddamn conversation. You're a feminist, after all.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:16 AM
1

The point is, "females" is often deliberately used to demean women. By whom, it's a word that used to be said in a manner that had less to do with you're physical capabilities and more with your physical makeup. I'm not sure why you're going down this rabbit hole and making this out to he some underlying issue facing women over a bunch of words that have no significance over your lives. Even these other words you brought up sounds like something you mostly seen online, and somehow you're compari…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:09 AM
1

You're seeing the usage of females as creepy. I think I understand where you're coming from. But why are we using words that have barely any historical significance, or maybe some for the sake of flirtation or description as creepy now? You're basically calling anyone who uses such a word a creep, and by this, I'm thinking you're one of these women who are offended by "female" being used as a noun. If not, then I'm not sure why you're so concerned over this and using this shaming language on us …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:53 AM
1

What are you talking about? He said that in his post, he refers to both men and women by their medical or biological terms and is basically wondering why the word "female" holds more of an offense than male. Although, I can't tell if this post is serious or not, or some of the comments here, that goes along with most of what I see on social media platforms like this.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:46 AM
1

You say that, but you ignore the cases of feminismsts groups disagreeing with men's shelters, and I already brought up the man or bear lquestionn with you, which is wholefully a feminist "awareness" social media presence which basically compares men to bares. You want to talk about dehumanization and objectification so much, but then focus more on your gender because you're a woman, and women are usually always in harmful situations according to you and your UN studies.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:39 AM
-1

You use the word creepy so much. Are you that weirded out by someone using the word female or male that isn't in some addressing formality or something? Sure, you could say that women back then during the time of Star Trek could have been offended by being called "doll" also. But as time changes, words change, I brought up the word "gay" because it's a wide known linguistic phenomenon that most people are aware of, which used to be aquated with happiness and joyfulness, and now its aquated with …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:56 AM
1

So you are hiding you're self to be taken seriously. And you're basically assuming most men here would wholeheartedly ignore you if you admitted that you were a feminist, that seems questionable on your part. But going further with this, you're still assuming with some sensitive discussion when it comes to women being offended over a word. The common misconception with feminism is that women are affected at larger scales, and somehow, these UN statements are bringing up accounts for the millions…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:38 AM
-1

It's creepy because they feel that way, but then again, languages change over periods of time. You brought up Star Trek, and I honestly should have brought up how, during the pilot running of that show, many words used back then would be seen as offensive in today's culture. And I'm not just talking about words with an uncomfortable history behind them. This stuff some women are offended over just seems like a selective offense, honestly. If you care so much about coming off a certain way, then …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:09 AM
1

You say you aren't a feminist, but I feel like people online say this to save face. It's as if you're embarrassed to refard yourself as one. But I'm not saying that, I'm actually saying that you are most likely following a small issue facing women as some sort of relevance to the word "female". I want to know the percentages of women online who re eibe these derogatory messages, because I'm sure that's also as low as the sex workers you brought up. We are talking about grammar and wordings, and …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:55 AM
-1

The show itself is old, and apparently the character's apparence is almost half the shows age, also. But Spock could have appeared more recently. The show itself is still basically a 1960s show about space cadets. That's your opening argument that we should take to heart for some reason. I'm not sure why you think defending the creepy alien guy helps your position tbh. I'm defending no one, I'm talking about intentions with words, in the nature of the word "female" being offensive, which can be …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:40 AM
0

Brother, you're referring to a character from a show / series that's over 60 years old who's portrayed as an alien to discuss how the word "female" sounds weird or offensive. If that's the best you can do for this argument. Then I don't know what else I can say here. But what I can say is that words have different meanings, and women getting offended over the way they are described shouldn't be that much of an issue if such an individual using such a word has good or decent intent. This whole ar…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:22 AM
1

Yes, people receive questionable responses, but the hostility is generally more prevalent towards women and demeaning in that regard. Women essentially have to fight to be seen as people You absolutely have no proof of this, and you're just going by your anecdotes. If you want to be for social justice, at least give evidence to your claims. Women being sexualized should have nothing to do with how the word female is used. You're making this sound like the word "female" has some historical signif…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:00 AM
1

So when women call each other dehumanizing words, is this still an issue? Because they do, almost more so than men, in real life and online. They also do this to men on social media, but rather than me saying that it's more prevalent, I'm just saying that it happens. You're making this into some women are more affected discussion now. These things you're referring about are the result of putting yourself out there online, you're bound to get questionable responses, but now you're saying most wom…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:27 AM
0

I would say dehumanizing behaviors are far more prevalent towards women, which is why it attracts so much attention. that's why they have such an issue with it Alright, even so, this may be just a form of biology and less with dehumanizing behavior. We are talking about words, you're bring up horny men on Instagram posts, I'm not sure this is why women are upset over the word "female", rather it being a word they so deem inappropriate because of it not being formal enough. Feminists can get offe…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:07 AM
0

What? Are you referring to Instagram and Only Fans models? Why are you surprised when these women demean themselves and then they get these comments from men? They are basically encouraging these guys. They're basically online prostitutes. What do women who don't post themselves on social media like this have to do with these girls? You're going off of discussion here and bringing up other things. I really don't understand this obsession with women wanting to be seen as human, as if men don't ge…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 02:51 AM
1

Really, because I've seen them get offended by being called women themselves, which should be seen as an accepted word to describe them socially and demographically. There's also the ever so more heated debate on whether trans women should be regarded as women themselves. And don't forget that these same women made a meme comparing men to bears from some form of public awareness of issues facing women. That could be looked at as dehumanizing, but the many guys who were offended over such a thing…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 02:31 AM
1

That's maybe because of the change of language over the years. Words like gay used to mean gleeful or happy. Now being called gay when you're not has been seen as wrong for decades. So now, feminists and women alike are claiming their biological name in certain usages, and this could very well change how they see it and however they feel about its usages.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:49 AM
2

It seems that you're not in the know. Look at the monsoon of posts all over social media by women alike dehumanizing men constantly. Comparing men to bears. And yet they're hellbent over a scientific word.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:35 AM
1

What I'm saying is that the word "female" depends on the person in question using it.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:32 AM
1

Feminists have been using shaming and dehumanizing words for decades. Why aren't women concerned over what other women say about men in wordings or otherwise since basically the start of the 20th century?
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:30 AM
2

By women and people in general, basically asking us men how we should say something right or we're just apathetic virgins.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:26 AM
1

Why should I emphasize over a person offended over a word that has less historical significance than other words that do? Sure, maybe in this day and age of modern day women's rights, but the word female can be used in an appropriate manner, there's not much significance besides formal approach and what one prefers to call themselves referring their gender or otherwise. One should understand that it depends on the nature of how one ended up using it. Using the word "female" isn't always said to …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:09 AM
-4

If a way of addressing someone like this seems creepy, then that's anyone's problem with linguistics, if I'm going to be honest here. It honestly depends on the connotation of why such a word was used in the first place. Or the person involved and their intentions when saying things like "female". Using Star Trek or any pop culture reference is meaningless as a whole when considering this. But with that Star Trek reference itself could be derived from some uncanny feeling, seeing as these wordin…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:34 PM
0

I feel like it depends on the brevity of the connotation of any of these word usages. The reason why things like race, ethnic, or religious names have offensive connotations to them has to do with the historical meanings behind them as well as modern day usages. With that being said, I would understand why someone would get offended by any of these things, considering humanity's past, which would include most of all races and ethnicities. But, going further, this may have to do with how we want …
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:34 PM
6

The same women getting offended by the word female may be the same ones who were and are still a part of the whole man or bear debate that has been going on for about a month now. If women are this offended at being compared to animals, and then thinking it's humorous when men get offended from being compared to bears, then I really don't know what to say here. There's always something these women's spaces have to be offended over with men in general, including male spaces like this and things l…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:24 PM
9

Forums about how guys cannot get laid and are upset because of said loneliness isn't that much of a real life problem. Women should be good at ignoring guys like this, if anything, right? Because if women are this easy to offend, then they aren't doing a good job when it comes to bringing down the patriarchy and calling men who get offended at being compared to bears fragile and worse than a bear.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:08 PM
13

You're demonstrating how obsessed you and this guy's female friends are with social media, especially on Reddit spaces that bring up this sort of discussion. The word female has always been used as a noun. There wasn't a new way of saying these things when websites like 4Chan and lonely men forums arose.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:02 PM
7

Yes, some of these sound off and misplaced, but to be offended at what you are as a whole shouldn't be that much of a problem.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 08:58 PM
8

I'm sorry, but how are women getting so upset over a word, whether such a word is used as a noun or an adjective? We are animals at the end of the day. Caring whether or not that's true is another story altogether. Although, I'm not surprised since society was made off of religious upbringings, so anything that may make us seem animalistic is looked down upon. Albeit, I feel that the word female would only be offensive from the person's intentions.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 08:53 PM
1

There are none. They are so caught up in their gynocentric worldviews that they'd rather due a gruesome and most probably longband drawn out death than be with a man they don't know. Because being feasted on for hours on end or made into human chili isn't as bad as being SA'd or worse things like being abused for weeks to months on end in some guys room like something off of some the movies or novels women have fantasies over.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 04:17 PM
1

So being a good or alright person isn't needed? In nature, these things are called that way, I'm really am using these words to describe what may have to be done in these relationships or lack thereof.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:06 AM
1

You're misunderstanding this whole conversation and making this out to be part of your women's rights beliefs that femininity when it comes to marriage and relationships means subservience. You are missing what I'm trying to say here, I'm not wanting women to be docile, but respectful, listening to their significant others, and nurturing. All these things are feminine traits both gay women and heterosexual women can learn from. Or at least one or the other has to fulfill some role in the relatio…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 11:11 PM
1

Saying something someone doesn't like shouldn't harm anyone that much, especially women. As long as what some others are saying doesn't go far enough, and if anything, some of these guys need some forms of therapeutic assistance. And these men are still with us today and going through the issues of their previous marriages, they are occasionally on this sub, so using phrases like "harmful towards women" isn't going to change their situation(s).
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:56 PM
-1

This discussion is all about just loneliness in men in general, and you sound no different than the women and men who accuse a lonely man of being some predatious individual. Yes, lonely guys are societies nobodies. We all know that all too well. But the underlying issue is how others are grouping lonely men together as the same person, like what you're doing. I'm not surprised by this coming from a redditor. Also, some feminists are also pussies, they're all online spreading misandry, spreading…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:30 PM
1

This really goes into the women are wonderful affect, and what I like to call them all men fallacy. Basically, thousands of guys do some unbelievable and unforgiving things to women and society, especially feminists, who would then announce such things to the world and and blame all men for these thousands of men's actions. The same can be said for loneliness in men, but it's usually the progressive left and feminists equating make loneliness to misogyny and entitlement to sex, because a few guy…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:10 PM
7

There are a diverse group of people here, with any group you'll have your outliers, but places like this will have your young guys trying to know and find themselves, gay men, married and single men, women are definitely here, and so on. A group of men who were mostly right leaning and had lost most of their belongings shouldn't represent all of us here. But you'll see guys like that here, but this place is for all the problems men are facing besides women and marriage as a whole. But with the e…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:17 AM
21

That was probably due to the fact that most of them were married men and were republican in some way and came from ended marriages while losing most of their stuff. Which is still sort of happening these days. The misogyny comes with that. But marriage and dating nowadays is a gamble, especially for men, if we're going to be honest.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 03:01 AM
6

We're not seen as heroic or just being seen as selfish to others, especially to modern day progressives who believe that men are the oppressors. "How dare he or they have a say in how hard they have it in life?" "How dare they have discussions about their loneliness, ignoring the fact that women are SA'd more, and women are affected more by the patriarchy?" "How dare they share their emotions without caring about women's issues? Are they misogynists?" "How can men have problems in life? Aren't t…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 02:04 AM
-2

some regular "feminist bad" bullshit like 99% of this subreddit. I really cannot understand why some of you would waste your days on here just to moan so much and not actually contribute to anything. Reddit is fascinating.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 01:33 AM
4

Ah, well, I'm going to assume you read some of what I wrote since you had the need to respond with this.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 01:29 AM
8

Calling sexual abuse a joke is upsetting, especially if these women were that serious about it. And if this is humor, then the women involved haven't been SA'd, why would victims go as far as making generalizations and bring up numbers and such then say "ha, this was all just a meme lol". If the meme and making false narratives about a gender is the only way women can be brought into attention when it comes to SA, then this should be more in some psychological discussion about women and how they…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 04:38 PM
8

I'm genuinely am not upset at the meme or the women in question, I'm more upset at ignorant people somehow defending this and calling it a joke on a serious discussion about sexual abuse. Sort of like what you're doing. If women are this passionate about awareness, I'd rather personally not make a damn meme, garnering around it. Making inside lines about it is fine. Sure, some men aren't taking women seriously about their past encounters and SA affecting women, but to broaden this into some meme…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 04:16 PM
8

I'm not upset, actually. But how the fuck are women joking about a serious topic after being serious and up in arms about it in the first place? If this is a way of saving face or getting attention, then I'm not buying it. Some of these things shouldn't be made fun of if said women want to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:55 PM
14

Yeah, because a bunch of dumbass women making a meme about SA is funny for some reason. Women sure love making memes about serious discussions and choosing wild and domesticated animals to have some sort of romance with. lmao 🤣
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:38 PM
16

There's nothing much to learn from this, and you know it. Women are subscribing to these feminist narratives in the west at a high enough degree to basically suit their certain needs and benefits they want out of said ideology. Some of these women who chose the bear most likely aren't even SA survivors and frankly used this meme as a way to seem part of the girl group or sisterhood in some way. Some went as far as saying that this meme was only that, just a meme. For things like SA, domestic abu…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:31 PM
21

They asked for it. Imagine thousands upon maybe close to millions of women on social media making some sort of humor around domestic abuse, sexual assault, and among other things women and feminists complain about, saying how men are the over all perpetrators. This sad bullshit that they do should be made a parody of until the end of humanity, these misandristic, androphobic women are an embarrassment to humanitarianism. These bs generalizations doesn't end, no these bitches are actually that co…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:25 PM
1

‘Caring more about stuff’ != ‘emotional imbalance.’ Thats not what I meant by emotional imbalances, I was saying that if lesbjam marriage aren't successful because of both women being less layed back then that is some imbalance in the relationship. You sort of said this yourself in great detail. Not the couples I’ve known. Emphasize on usually, the ones you know may have it in their homes, you may not know what goes on behind closed doors, it could be in the bedroom or in private in some way. Ye…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 07:38 PM
1

You're bringing up some decent inquiries. But, you're basically saying that the emotional imbalance of women causes them to basically not get along. My hypothesis was similar to yours, but I brought In gender roles, because gay men usually have a provider and caretaker system, sort of emulating male and female heterosexual relationships. I was saying that since gay men have fewer issues with DV, then that should mean that women may have to adopt this way of companionship as to have sort of a bal…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 06:54 PM
1

Bro, you already came in here ready to start bs. The reason why you're even getting responses and have the time to give minimal responses to these girls is because you, my friend, must have a good surmountabke amount of options. Good for you, you're more interesting and attractive than say 80 percent of men, and you aren't NY far struggling to find a girl. You said this shit yourself. I'm flooded with dates on apps and never talk longer than 5 messages before asking her out. You're basically bra…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:54 PM
2

I really don't understand your trolling here, but I'm basically saying that lesbian marriages are going behind because of the lack of gender roles the women in question have to adapt on. Basically, both women in such a marriage can't seem to understand who's supposed to be a provider or a housewife. I brought in feminism simply because of one of its narratives of making marriage into some patriarchal entitlement. So these women may be just at a disadvantage when it come gay marriage as opposed t…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 02:51 PM
2

Uhm, I believe I'm responding to you in English.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 11:25 PM
1

I guess I was wrong for saying the actual reason why gay marriage for women in this day and age would have its problems down the road.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 07:57 PM
1

Some of you need to branch off the ideological arguments and actually have conversations with others without an agenda. That would be more preferable for me, tbh.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 07:49 PM
6

That's your view, who knows why most of these lesbian marriages are unsuccessful when it comes to the individuals involved. You could say that a woman in such a marriage has to adopt a feminine role, and modern day women are less attracted to such gender roles, I would assume lesbian women are just the same. The underlying factor is that women in lesbian marriages are as unsuccessful as heterosexual marriages between a man and a woman. Whether they're horrible or not is really not what we're say…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 02:25 AM
3

Oh, I'm not in disagreement with that. Women are easily emotional human beings when it comes to certain aspects of responsibility and their natural rivalry with other women. This is probably the main cause of why lesbian marriages adopt these results. But I feel like the underlying message is that modern day female ideologies and beliefs caused this sense of entitlement in women and may be the better factor as to why both lesbian and heterosexual marriages are unsuccessful.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 02:16 AM
4

The results are in our faces. Even if I was blaming women, these results are literally right in front of us. You're the ones in denial, not me or the others who are somewhat in agreement with me in this forum.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 02:09 AM
6

We are not really blaming an entire gender. We are blaming the affects of a gender from years of influence which caused them to be easily under appreciated by marriage, and seeing how women are far from marriage worthy with each other, this is something that needs to be looked into thoroughly. And yes, these women are the problem, and other women rarely hold women like these accountable, and this goes for modern feminism's hold on women being ignored by other women who at least uphold their natu…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:55 AM
5

Likewise, it's not one day where feminist women don't mouth off about how badly they have it and how men are bad. It's only fair.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:48 AM
10

I disagree even with the formatting of that statement It's fascinating how women alike are this attached to this modern ideology. But it's fine and acceptable for women to ignore such things that hold them somewhat accountable as some falsehood. This isn't even a generalization, but more on the fact that modern day feminism caused the lessening of feminine roles for women, and any woman who adopted such an ideology would see the results. Considering the innumerable amounts of women subscribed to…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:45 AM
10

You basically agreed with the original poster. If women can be easily influenced by feminism's narratives and adopt masculine variables as a opposed to feminine and nurturing roles, it's no wonder why even lesbian couples are also not surviving the modern marriage zeitgeist.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:38 AM
8

How aren't women the problem? If lesbian relationships are as high as gay male relationships in divorce, it should maybe really indicate that women are emotional in more at an inevitability to an end of a relationship. Women are more selective than they have been throughout human history, are more promiscuous, hypergamous, and far from feminine than say almost 100 years ago. It's as if lesbianism reveals the underlying fact that women cannot handle each other being a sole provider and varing a l…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:26 AM
19

Porn has been readily available and abundant for decades. Pornography has been around for thousands of years. Even you could say a few cave paintings would depict the act of intercourse between any sort of creative mind that made such a thing back then. In Ancient Greece and Rome, homo eroticism was a thing. In places like India, belly dancers were common. Prostitution in itself is probably one of the oldest professions, and despite its questionable nature in society as of today, it's still bein…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:13 PM
1

So it seems that you posted on r/atheism almost 10 years ago, and about a year ago, you decided to rehash with your unused account to troll. Well played, humble redditor. Well played.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:05 AM
2

Sad? Women naturally are selective creatures, go to almost any dating percentage, and you'll see how less men are seen as superficial on these apps and compared to a more agreeable graph of information when it comes to finding women. Women almost want a perfect man more than anything, or at least a masculine and healthy individual. Men nowadays and throughout history were usually always lonely, even in the days of war and kings where masculinity would raign had this same natural dilemma. Some wo…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:31 AM
15

Which she alluded to being by her same beliefs that led her to her loneliness and focus on something that isn't a part of her biological and maternal needs. Women may have choices, but that wasn't due to feminism. Women weren't bound to marry and have their choices to wed or be wage earners, bosses, and businesses owners of their choosing. The prospect of female loneliness is also ignorant, really, because women are able to have relationships more easily than men, especially if they are young, f…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:06 PM
7

"Feminism has failed out generation(s)" or "feminism has failed us" is what this lady has said in this said article. It would seem that anything that has a different perspective on your religion is seen as distasteful, while you not reading thus I'd depth yourself and making such a conclusion because you don't see the problems with your ideology. You came here just to share your opinions without looking into what this all is informing. And people like you who do this are common here, but nonethe…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 03:57 PM
1

I see this as something that biologically cannot be changed, unless some millions of men perish through some war or something. Naturally men are seen as disposable because you'll usually need one man to impregnate multiple women, as with a woman there's more risks involved and women are more seen as docile birthing Jen houses to our species. If you could add in how men sympathise with women more, women's needs for safety and their better in group biases, then you'll understand how men are at a g…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 11:49 PM
1

My guy, he's not affecting at least 3 percent of the world. He's not touching 000.3% of the world with this message. He has his freedom of speech. You're making this into some dire political affair, with your added meaninginless drama. Get the hell our of this sub or add something to the discussion that isn't just shaming. I usually see you guys come here to do your thing and not on the feminist subs. Only in men subs do you guys try to parent our behaviors.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:37 PM
–

How's this sad? At least he isn't calling women being worse than bears.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:17 PM
1

He wasn't going off mindlessly like you were here. So, who's more upset here? Why are you so unnerved by this message, honestly? You may need to calm down yourself.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:13 PM
5

This sounds scripted.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:11 PM
31

Imagine a guy making a 100 page report on misandry and its effects in society since basically the start of the 20th century, then watch it get published and laughed at by the majority of people. Feminists are so affected by the online "manoshpere" to the fact that they have to make this much of a documentary about it. And yet they're all online calling men fragile and intimidated by their cause.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:40 PM
2

We are all governed by our instincts whether we believe in it or not. It's ironic coming from progressives like you who are usually non religious hearing this because religious scholars would say that we are also above our animalistic nature.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:50 PM
3

Yeah, but certain factors are in place where it comes to having the hots for a woman. She has the risk of pregnancy and such, so in the end, if you're not her available suitor, she'll most likely get upset that you're the one who's interested in her. So, that's the underlying problem when it comes to what they wear. They want attention from who their attracted to, and some women would go out of their way to advertise themselves. Men, on the other hand, wear designer clothes and dress with care t…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:28 PM
0

This goes for both genders. There's nothing horrible about this way of thinking, and people shouldn't ignore human biology when it comes to attractiveness and wanting a partner. Women in general are more selective but also want attention from an available suitor. The same goes for men, but the difference is that men are less selective than women. But being that men are less selective would suggest that we need less attention than women who are more selective. There's nothing wrong with this way …
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:21 PM
3

You're focusing so much on things that don't actually solve the issue. A man doesn't need to be misogynistic to abuse others, I'm not sure why things like catcalling and beaches have anything to do with women feeling unsafe. If beaches are so bad as you say they are because of the presence of guys being around, then people shouldn't go to them. This is what you're alluding to for any area, even if it has a lot of people around. You are, again, debasing a gender and seeing the worst possible outc…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:14 PM
3

So you want society to advise women to stay away from men but you don't want society to see men as a problem. Because by asking women to stay away you tell them that men aren't safe. If men are a problem, so are women. Women are also capable of misconduct. You are seeing a whole gender as a problem. You are assuming most men are abusers and don't have any morals. That's what you're saying, no matter how you trying to put the blame on men not showing other men how to behave around women. Yes most…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:58 AM
5

it is a problem men should focus on, men have raised boys in this way. You should call out your friends for catcalling, for SA A problem men should focus on? Why can't society advise women also to stay away from men they barely know, because that's all too common. Because, in all sincerity, you are focusing on an issue the majority of men aren't responsible for, most of which don't have friends that do this stuff, and you are assuming the worst for some gender. What you're saying will also lesse…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:37 AM
2

India has a larger population than other regions of the world in basically island. Also, I'm sure that scenerio you gave can isn't that bad when you consider a beach having people around. I'm not sure how that is shoeing how unsafe women are. but knowing that you are always weaker with the idea that there are still a lot of men in society these days that view women as less must give women the feeling they are very vulnerable. Sure. Women are weaker, which doesn't mean any man is some abuser from…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:26 AM
5

How are women unsafe? At least in a first world country? These assumptions are indefinitely broadening an issue, and making certain regions of the world where women are saying they are uncomfortable around men seem dangerous. We have American women saying this, and this question was actually first posed in England.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:49 AM
5

So you don't see the responses to this question as a little androphobic? Others are saying that this question is misandristic to assume that a man would be an abuser when alone with said man, but I see this as a main consensus on some women's fear of men.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:42 AM
6

Fair enough. But there are women preferring a long and bloody death over a man that could sexually abuse them, some go as far as saying that said man could abuse them for days to years. I think some of these women need therapy.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:30 AM
6

Sure, but that undermines the question, that said man could be any man. You could have gotten to know such a man also before he uses his ways to lure you in, so if you're going to assume any man is a potential threat, I'm going with a guy that you could have gotten to know. But this question is assuming any man you're alone with, will be some offender. I could also bring up night clubs in this conversation, but then again, a club setting has security, and some women aren't in their best minds in…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:24 AM
7

You are if you're In a rural place where no one is around in, say, a 100 mile radius. You and the man should rather try and find a way out, so that's really what I meant by survival. But women are assuming that any man could be an offender just because he's a man.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:17 AM
4

That's their way of seeing things, I guess. They aren't here to discuss anything beyond emotions and their beliefs. Unfortunately, some women out there see us men as dangerous, and feminism and things like the gender studies they learned adds more of this disassociation.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:12 AM
11

But bears are much more stronger than your average male. You would rather be with a creature who could quite literally tear your face off effortlessly than some man who could help you with survival? You have to look at this in other means than just biology and these assumptions you're making.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:09 AM
6

But why assume any man is more dangerous and less predictable? Don't you think this question poses most men as threats to anyone, not just women? It may not be all men, but it's a broad description of a gender that most women would assume to be potential threats if they had the opportunity to be alone with a man, ignoring the innumerable amounts of women who meet with men on dating apps, some going as far as driving miles just to meet up with one. But I guess some women would prefer dating guys …
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:02 AM
4

They may not say that, but that's not their focus. Go and read what the commenter said above me. She or he is basically saying it isn't racist to assume what race the man could be. So, saying a black person or any other race wouldn't be anything they were in discussion about, in their perspective. This question for them is just about our gender and less about race.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:54 AM
7

They don't care. Even if you change the ethnic background of said man, they would go around and say that this is specific to our gender and most likely call us everything in the book for asking that. Some of these women aren't here for discussing this without emotion, unfortunately. This is just androphobia, honestly.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:19 AM
6

You're seeing this sensibly, but you don't understand how some women would go as far as assuming any man would have the urge to harm them, just from being with one alone. This is saying that women see men as potential threats when alone with them, this is basically saying that any man is a potential abuser simply because he's a man. Likewise we could say the same for women, but society looks at statistics to determine what gender is worse, ignoring that both men and women can be just as dangerou…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:12 AM
21

If this is all just some bait, I don't know how making abuse and misandry humorous as a way to lure men in a good thing. Then again, we cannot underestimate feminists and their bs.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:42 PM
3

You are clearly using it as a space to rant about how you perceive women to be taking over the world. You’ve literally written, unprompted, a creative and detailed fantasy about your problems being as bad as life as an enslaved laborer, somehow managing to hit both categories of race and sex inaccurately and with poor taste. You don't know anything about me, sir. Seems that I missed this message. You have some odd way of communicating with others, as well as assumptions. You said you were some s…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:21 PM
2

But what I was saying is that it’s 100% true than in general many women have been subordinated which is or has been systemically enforced All throughout human history, both men and women were seen as less than by monarchs and the wealthy. That's hasn't changed much. Your responses were based on emotions. You aren't here to change anyone's minds. You were saying things about women, ignoring other historical problems, and honestly sounded like you were saying that all women throughout history were…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:11 PM
1

Your hyperbole is clear, man. I'm done here Bye 👋
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:53 PM
1

Alright I think I'm done here Bye 👋
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:52 PM
2

You cannot go around that and then be serious with me. I meant definitely, surely, without a doubt, recorded a million times, and discoverable through simple logic. Why are you being so hyperbolic throughout this whole discussion. You're basing almost all your evidences on emotion. We're dies this lie we're we should take you at face value and not some fake or puppeteered account looking for a reaction. If you want to discuss things without saying shit like that, then you had the chance. But you…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:49 PM
2

Alright. The post is odd, but you went off, I think you admitted to being some sjw earlier, so that makes sense. Tell your creator we said hey 👋.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:43 PM
2

Yes. They're empty, nothing to be concerned about. It's a good wording. You belong with those women and men on those subs, and now all of a sudden, you're afraid of them. Make up your mind, fembot.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:41 PM
2

You're calling others here names because we're disagree with your views on human history. That's all this discussion was, so you are focusing on my views that you see as misogynistic and not the discussion itself about the differences in the history of men and women. You started this by saying 100 percent of women were abused throughout history, and that in itself already is means for a response from anyone who would see such a thing on here.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:37 PM
2

And yet you share their benign views. What else is new?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:33 PM
2

That also doesn't mean anything. Accounts could have been made years ago and still being reformed for algorithmic engagement. Artificial accounts are common here.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:31 PM
1

You're a false account. Omg.. Bye
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:38 PM
3

No one is perfect, and say if I was a misogynist, at least here me out. I don't understand why people in debates care so much about others' orientation so much. Even incarcerated individuals have something interesting to say. We're all human. But I'm asking for genuine discussions, but this is Reddit, after all.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:36 PM
3

You're one-sided as hell with women's history, bro, that's the problem I have with you.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:32 PM
3

How is it against women to critique their ideology, other women's behaviors affecting men, and so on? Other feminist subs does this constantly with men and make fear mongering propaganda with men just as much as the guys do here. Like. Seriously? 100 percent of women were abused in the past? This post had more do with men, and you still were bringing up one sided responses. That's basically the shit you brought in here.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:29 PM
3

You said that women had faced 100 percent of the problems of oppression in the past, called others here incels, and started going further down the "I'm right, you're wrong" path. You're honestly just a troll. I'm unfortunately feeding you. But let's see how far you'll go here.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:24 PM
3

So you're calling me a misogynist? Just say that. Because so far, anytime a guy comes in and talks about his hardships or men throughout history dying in wars, you people couldn't help but want to shame us. What part of my messages are harmful to women? Because I said that they weren't as oppressed as many like to believe? Are you're feeling so hurt ri just make all this up and end this with shaming languages? Because that's mostly what you guts like to do. I don't know your friends, family, gir…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:20 PM
3

Why are you so adamant about history as if all history is perfectly listed and not changed for an agenda? Yes, such a thing happens, all too often. Have you heard of The Library of Alexandria? Or how about the missing evidences of past hominids? History isn't perfect, but you're coming in here as if what you're saying is absolute, and I'm saying that men and women all throughout human history had their harships. You're bringing up benign feminist talking points. You aren't here for discussion. F…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:12 PM
6

Good for you, but your debates are more of gloating and trying to seem right. As well as so many one sided arguments you have on human history, you people aren't serious.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:01 PM
6

Bro, go troll somewhere else. Your credibility was lessened by calling me basically a misogynist for having a response to your messages. Redditors like you soley aren't here for genuine discussions without being emotional and one sided.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:59 PM
4

You truly scare me as a man. I thought the incel thing was a myth. I thought, how could there really be men like this? And I guess all it takes is an online forum. Sure, and you're the serious one calling me a lonely man on a men's forum because I'm not like a sad woman pleaser such as yourself. You honestly think you're better than anyone here because you're a misandrist. You guys couldn't even come here with different perspectives. It's just to shame, ridicule, and demean us. You honestly thin…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:43 PM
7

Your perspectives aren't new. You know quite well what you're doing on a sub like this. You clearly aren't serious, but still have an agenda to preach as if other feminists haven't said it to the sand already.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:37 PM
4

You are quite interesting, tbh, but if you're lingering on idiocy, then that could be a possibility also. Like I also said, by you saying how insecure I am about women "taking over the world" implies that, you not only do not belong on this sub, but you're a misandrist pos that supports a gendered based government. The irony of feminism trying to take down a patriarchy and replacing it with a matriarchy, while claiming egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:34 PM
4

Are you even trying to argue, or are you just going to keep ass kissing one sided feminist talking points? I always wondered what's with the obsession about women claiming that they were oppressed for thousands upon thousands of years, ignoring the multitudes of plights and oppression men also had to deal with in the past, including enslavement. It's as if you guys ignore that, blame all men, and continue to demonise us further in the modern day age. People like you aren't here to genuinely disc…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:29 PM
7

Women taking over the world? Isn't that a matriarchy? I thought men and women were equal. Thus, we should lead the world equally, right? By what premise do you think what you're saying is anything that isn't as insecure and batshit dumb?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:23 PM
0

What's with all the libs in here?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:21 PM
4

Why are you people here to spread misinformation? Seriously, the aspect of women's rights in itself isn't egalitarian and empathizes on women being the only overarching concern of human history's atrocities, ignoring the millions upon millions of men who have fallen in wars, diseases, and also slavery, any form of it that you could imagine.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:19 PM
5

You're so one sided it's baffling that women like you come here to be taken seriously. You're not speaking for the majority of men. Certain men back then had better privileges, those being wealthy, rich men and their families. Similar to how life is today. To say that only women were subjected and somehow owned as slaves is one of the most one sided ignorant feminist talking points. To say that women weren't the only ones allowed to vote is also ignorant, and even so, the reason being for that h…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:08 PM
1

Yeah, the fucking moronic "men bad, wah" drama you dumb bitches started on social media because it's just a hobby of you guys like to do. Sure, cry me a river about such drama that you asses love to cause and then pussy out on accountability.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:36 PM
–

How the hell is bunch of women comparing men to omnivorous woodland creatures a fucking shitpost? Say if we had men comparing women to animals that murder, rape, and beat, then we'd be merely hiding behind some inside joke? So women joking about assault, murder, and death is funny? Comparing men to carnivorous and omnivorous animals is funny?
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:21 PM
1

You're not original. There's so many like you on this platform who are similar to you. You came in here with your opinions and left with us with nothing but ridicule. There was no meaning behind your commentaries from the start. You aren't bringing any nuance to this forum and no care for an adult discussion.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:59 AM
4

Yeah, it's what it is
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:48 AM
1

Yeah, apparently moderators are removing said posts. For whatever reason, I don't know. Could be a spam issue, but I suspect it's to not attract engagement from other subs doing what they like to normally do here. I guess I'm all for it, but at the same time, I feel like this is a form of censorship and silencing our opinions. The bear thing really is another thing some guys might get hung up on, so I cannot blame them.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:46 AM
127

Yeah, it's baffling. Just earlier today, I was arguing with a guy on here of all places defending female offenders with minors and saying how us bringing up double standards in the justice system concerning women and women's in group biases means were misogynists who don't like women. The bear situation is actually getting removed from this sub every time someone brings it up, so your post could be next.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:34 AM
1

And you're calling others here reading a 4th grade level, while you couldn't have the time to hear some of us out for a decent conversation. Nah, you don't want one. It's fundamentally batshit unfair on how misandristic this site is, and as much as you maginas bore me, I just can't help but try and put out a little of the dumpster fire you guys call an ego. You guys come in here with your holier than thou attitude, shame us, and see us as something to ridicule and demean. How much of a great mem…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:09 AM
1

How is literacy so important to you than what you were claiming about the founder and his opinions? You aren't staying on the subject about him or mens rights. You had so many opportunities to continue these responses in a more responsible manner. But no.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:04 AM
5

Humans are biased in general, but women and men favor women more, and women as a whole would agree with other women more than men would. In a sense, men have less of an in group bias than women. You'll only see this if some men knew each other good enough or they are at least of the same belief system(s), age, or demographic. There are women who would support abusing other men for personal gain and less men supporting the same for other men (if not influenced by women's wants or needs or some be…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:29 AM
1

By the way, feminism isn't perfect either, so you're comparing different nomenclatures here. Both can have their flaws. This post brings up one of those flaws in the way feminism holds less accountability for women. In this case, predatory behaviors with minors are usually brushed off. You coming in here calling us misogynistic, invalidating our problems with double standards, and shaming us with the founder isn't going to change that. I'm not even understanding if you're of age yourself, seeing…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:16 AM
1

I'm sure this movement was made as a response to feminism being for women only. It's in the name that there should be no other definitions for feminism besides the rights and freedoms being asked from women, for women. By the way, this whole conversation started with you claiming that the founder doesn't like what we're doing here, I would like if you would give some credibility to that claim also. But this community should, in turn, be a support group in need, considering how feminism isn't ega…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:05 AM
1

I called you one first, the thing about comebacks is that you have to call someone something different as a response.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:48 AM
2

The founder of something doesn't represent the whole movement. A woman could have started mens rights, and she would still be uniformed by how men naturally are at times. Being how she'll see things from a woman's perspective. Him supporting feminism is one thing, but supporting feminism is his personal choice, there's nothing wrong with that, but with the information laid out about said ideology he shouldn't be concerned with something that isn't really egalitarian from its actual basis. But th…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:45 AM
1

With how your language is formed and the way you presented yourself here, I fairly wouldn't be surprised if you were in middle school.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:39 AM
1

I never said to defend rapists. Bitch, you're literally here defending female rapists by moving the goal post for men, as if men don't get enough shit from others when it comes to sexual offense. We know that men do this shit also, but the guys on here are bringing up double standards while your soy brain couldn't help but call others here misogynists for that shit. You're a special case of dumb ass, sir. I said OP shouldn't believe men don't do that shit. When the fuck did he say men don't do t…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:50 PM
2

"Farrell initially came to prominence in the 1970s as a supporter of second wave feminism but has since become a leading figure of the men's rights....Farrell advocates for "a gender liberation movement", with "both sexes walking a mile in each other's moccasins".[ You think you found something credible? He supported second wave feminism, which mind you isn't similar to how feminism is now, he also wasn't aware of how feminism started as some matriarchal group, which you could say 4th wave femin…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:43 PM
1

Ah, you aren't serious. You better get ready for middle school next week, son.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:40 PM
3

I don't worship shit. But I know misogyny when I see it. How the fuck is defending female rapists not being a kiss ass, female worshipping, dumb ass? You're here calling misogyny over guys calling out double standards, I'm surprised you even had the time to read my shit. You must be bored, son.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:37 PM
2

You, plus, dumb troll, plus dad beats him daily.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:35 PM
2

You understand Mens Rights Activism is based in Feminism and that the founder hates misogynists like you? And who or what the fuck do you mean by the "founder"? Are you this up your ass to the point that you have to make shit up, and not give credible sources to your claims? Who is the founder of MensRights? And how is MensRights based on feminism besides just wanting respect, while feminism wants a matriarchal ruling. The ideology itself is less concerned with women's rights, if anything. You'r…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:33 PM
4

Men and women do the same shit because they're equals and to assume otherwise will get you taken advantage of. And yet we aren't treated the same, dumbass. You then wonder why women get more slaps on the wrist, allowed to wholeheartedly dump on men daily, hone a lack of accountability in relationships, see themselves as sexually superior, and overall feminism being a disgusting group in itself. Believing that the majority of men should not only be castrated but face genocide under their perverse…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:21 PM
5

You're either trolling or don't know what the hell you're talking about. The fact that you assholes would go to so many lengths just to defend women is something that's all too common. If men and women were equal, then they're should be just as equal consequences and ridicule for women, but we rarely see that shit, and you're here proving that further.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:13 PM
3

If you want to ask the question in reverse.. you have to ask the same question. That's not a requirement. This conversation isn't some game. Don’t compare your question to the bear question. Why shouldn't I? I'm asking if men where asked this same question in the scenerio of women being horrible smelly whores, would there be a good or bad response? I'm just asking. What the fuck is wrong with you people? You’re literally the man we’re scared of in the woods lmfao Eh, don't care.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:35 PM
1

Why should I change the scenario? Let's ask these questions to men, and they'll call women unworthy and horrific creatures, and let's see how accepted that'll get. The fact that you wanted me silenced on that says more about you and women who are a part of this gynocentric bullshit. And to answer, I'd choose a woman, because free sex.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:18 PM
4

So if this sort of scenerio was asked for men and they're responding from a consensus saying that women are horrible creatures and we should adopt gynophobia, then that's a balanced argument?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:08 PM
2

Anecdotes aren't going to help. If women are so afraid of men, then they should adopt homo eroticism.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:55 PM
1

A, you're not an actual human, ah. And I wrote so much...
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:53 PM
5

Bears are fairly peaceful creatures that prefer to avoid humans. In the scenario where they aren't dreadfully hungry, aren't around their cubs, or aren't around humans with malice themselves, sure. But most humans aren't outdoors around bears, so this argument is as benign as it could get, considering the general population aren't around wild animals, thanks to men, honestly. But I guess some women don't discuss or discern the aspect that most wildlife preservations and segregated areas were acc…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:41 PM
1

This sub has been around for about 18 years, and has been getting messages by these creatures since its creation. This says a lot about this app, but also how serious others see men's spaces like this as something to ridicule and misinform.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:38 PM
2

Bruh, even domestic animals can be cumbersome. The fact that women are outwardly doing this has to come from some inner demons or something.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:29 PM
5

Says the person who got emotional and called men wanting a semblance of peace and brotherhood a bad thing, or a waste of time. Likewise, by some of the rhetoric you said earlier here about men having to ignore these issues, we should also bring up how women shouldn't care if men are not taking them seriously and harassing them constantly also. Because why should a group of unfortunate people be cared for, why should we care for those that need some sort of belonging or purpose in life? You're he…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:08 PM
5

The first thing I want to mention about Passport Brothers, or however they want to be called, I like to call them foreign, young, bachelors, but anything else is up to anyone. The encompassing narrative is that men finding happiness for themselves is an act of selfishness, especially if it has anything to do with women being undesirable or horrible partners to have and some semblance of itamacy to be or marry with. I don't have any issues with Passport Bros when it comes to finding fun, sex, and…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 08:40 PM
7

I'm wondering how you coming in here to cry about your problems is solving anything, because it's not. This is a men's forum. You're not only invalidating our problems but are laughing at us and comparing us to conspiracy theorists or something. I'm basically describing your misandry, and how easy it is for women like you to talk so much bs about men and being praised for it outside of places like this.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:10 PM
9

Yes. Some of these so called women's rights members are hypocrites, using the guise of feminism to allow their open misandry, and they love that they have such a privilege. Especially these women past their younger years are so much like this.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:50 PM
6

Likewise. If women want to cry about their issues and want sympathy, then everyone else has the right to ignore them.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:43 PM
2

Because, you sad sack of dog brain shit, these stats are catered towards women, and 90 percent where? Worldwide? This is similar to those stats saying 1 in 4 women are homeless and ignore the other almost 80 percent are men? How most victims of suicide are men, and yet I saw women like you boasting about how they "attempt it more". And what the fuck are you going to do to solve these issues facing women besides running your fingers ona keyboard at different forums because your vibrator bores you…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:38 PM
1

Ah, another female redditor who can't seem to find a man getting off on being sad and desperate for attention on a gynocentric and highly misandrist platform. Women like are are the reason why misogyny is a thing amongst a multitude of men, crying and laughing at male issues and you have the audacity to want to be taken seriously on a platform such as this? A place where you're seen as safe. Don't get me wrong, this sub isn't perfect, but you're clearly a troll, and most likely a middle aged and…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:27 PM
1

I mean, the most perfect relevant example would be the infamous "softy guy era" trend going on social media right now. You'll have women and men alike giving off horrible responses, calling men abusers, in that we deserve to be alone, using homosexuality as an insult, and so on. Men having standards, having an open voice for themselves is usually met with bad backlash, unfortunately. I've seen actual men threatening other men for this satirical movement that basically is a clone of the soft girl…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:05 PM
1

Yes, the thing that some men don't seem to understand is that they're easily disposable and cannot get a woman unless some of us have some sort of masculine frame to ourselves. It could be a variety of factors, but as long as the man seems capable of honing a spouse and is usually healthy and good looking, he's guaranteed success in spreading his genes. All throughout history, you'll see a multitude of higher status men getting most women, even having them as pleasure slaves and it was normal pr…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:49 PM
1

These women are getting a taste of their own medicine. How are we supposed to feel bad for these same women who are from an idealogy that constantly demonises men, glorifies promiscuity and hypergamy, and thinks of men who aren't some male feminist or hot guy as losers, subhuman, and bad influences? These women are getting a taste of nature. It's about t8me they're joining the club of disenfranchised and lonely, sexless, men thsnjd to their dumbass ideology. I hope they'll enjoy their stay, unti…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:28 AM
3

That's basically the basis of feminism. A huge matriarchal movement focused on the benefits of women. This would include things like eugenics for the benefits of women spreading their genes with favorable men, using higher status, and or good looking men as fodder and resources. Some could be for love. But love for these women is more or less a means of satisfying their whims and less concerning what the man wants in said relationship. So, handsome, well off men may be seen as more human, but th…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 02:48 AM
1

My shame? Alright, you're not an actual person, so this, whatever this is, can be finished, I believe.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 03:19 PM
1

Blah blah blah, dumb femcel or fem false account here to troll. And I'm pretty sure you're the one here with a vagina. You did tell me your gender identity, after all. I hope that's going well for you.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 03:08 PM
2

Are you even reading my responses diligently, or are you here to start nonsense with a bunch of guys on a Reddit forum? Seems like the last part. I'm basically answering you're misunderstandings of what the above poster was saying, it seems that you're in you're feelings because you probably had used the same shaming languages for guys you haven't agreed with in the past, or maybe you currently do, and this seems too close to home for you. Good job at making my argument hold more credibility by …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 02:54 PM
2

This is how any rational person would phrase that observation: "women have an easier time getting laid than men." There. Simple. Sure, but any rational person who understands biology would understand that women are selectors when it comes to choosing others for a chance at itamacy or a relationship. They are offered more sex from men as a result of how men usually have the natural urge to spread their seed. This isn't anything new. You're still a moron who's obviously in the wrong sub. What's tr…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 02:26 PM
2

When I said that you're probably a scripted user, I meant that you aren't a real person. The fact that you didn't understand that makes your account more suspicious. But every now and then, you individuals will come in here and use shaming languages or silencing methods whenever women are involved in the discussion. I can understand that human beings are infatuated with their drama online, but you seem too obvious of one thats using basically an engagement account.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 02:05 PM
3

Don't think your misogyny gets a pass because you tacked a "maybe" on the end. It's an observation. Women have more sex often than men. They are seen as more desirable. The average woman will get men monsooning over her if she so happens to show herself on dating profiles, so women have easier access to sex, offers sex to those their attracted to, and this causes a majority of them to see themselves as a means to usher in men who can take care of a woman. In a sense, women are offered sex more s…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:17 PM
2

You're a special cornball, or probably not an actual person, and most likely just a scripted user messing around here like a dumbass. You're for mens rights, and yet you haven't made a single meaningful post on here that's worth a read, just a bunch of comments anyone with a lot of time on their hands can read. You are either a bored troll, or otherwise, not a real human being. Because commenting about men talking about women as if that's wrong is not only bullshit, but you basically sound like …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:03 PM
3

You sound like such a dumb ass saying this shit. The commenter isn't so sure of himself and his words anyway. But he has a valid point, this applies to men as well, anyone who shames others for their virginity or lack thereof in success with another gender for the sake of winning an argument themselves sees sex and relationships as something to pursue more or so in life than anything else. And a person virgin shaming only sees sex as a means of being in one's manhood or womanhood. But way to mis…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:55 PM
4

If this sub is a joke to you, then why participate? Is the fact that women can be chastised and ridiculed bother you so much? When most times it's well deserved? How could anyone take you asswipes seriously while virgin shaming and not even having the courage to stand up against the overall misandry on social media and Reddit as a whole? You'll support men's rights as long as it doesn't involve women, while ignoring that women over all don't support us and subsribes to the benefits feminism has …
/r/MensRights08/04/24 01:43 AM
4

You say "I’m not calling everyone I disagree with incels. However, subs like this sadly attracts more than a few." But then you said.. This sub has a lot of guys on here who don’t go outside and don’t get girls, so then they just hate on anything woman related online to make themselves feel better. That's basically what you're denying. Mens rights can only be allowed if women aren't involved in the discussion. Many people seem to not understand that feminism is a women's rights movement. Many wo…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 01:28 AM
3

Edit: I had positive things to say about this sub too and got downvoted for it. I think you can tell which type of comment section this is. Oh well. You're on here calling others virgins who can't get women. That's why you're getting downvoted. Instead of having a decent discussion with others on why they have problems with women you go ahead and start virgin shaming and believing that they're all hermits who can't have conversations with women, all the while you're pretty much doing the same. Y…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 01:14 AM
3

Reddit needs to be consciously reevaluated. This post and others like this are common and reads like what you're basically saying here. Thanks for the heads up. Hopefully, others are just as informed and will come across your comment.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 01:09 AM
5

Why is the default response from men saying stuff about women has do with their relationship status or their virginity? Some guys who aren't too fond of women aren't just that way because they cannot get laid. This thought process is so stereotypical and makes us men to be only valued if we are good friends or in a relationship with a woman as if that's some requirement to not be upset. There are so many women who'll say absolutely nothing against feminism and women's behavior unless it benifts …
/r/MensRights08/04/24 01:01 AM
2

Thank you. Men here are basically supporting this in group bias. Humans, in general, are protective of women, seeing how they are seen as weaker and as child barers subconsciously.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:34 AM
6

Alright, you're a troll. I understand. But you aren't fooling me. There's women on the Internet who actively support feminism and don't say anything else against their pervasive narratives unless it would benefit them. This woman is most likely a concern troll, and many guys here like you are lurkers who waited for a dumbass post like this.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:19 AM
4

You sound like some holier than thou dumb fuck. You guys are coddling them. These same women don't say shit to other women, don't correct them on their inhumane remarks at men. I rarely see it, and this bitch comes in here to call us out like we're the problem when some of us here understands how gynocentricism is permeated and accepted and not talked against. I'm not being fooled by this bullshit. From this woman or a man playing this off as if we should have no say on female behavior.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:14 AM
9

Why the hell are women so worshipped? Can they too not be held accountable? There's women on other subs calling for genocide, this original poster is most likey a fucking troll. She's probably from those subs and pretending to give a shit about us while reminding us not to talk about women or something. Women are so coddled that it's embarrassing, such as meaningless posts like this and concerns like yours.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 12:08 AM
9

So many apologetics here also. This isn't too surprising. Even guys on this sub want validation.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:20 PM
25

Please stop this concern troll bait. It's embarrassing. Most women and girls are feminists to some degree and support it's misandry in some way or another. If feminism wasn't so supported by women, it wouldn't have been so successful. It wouldn't have garnered multitudes of women on social media supporting it and allowing it to continue in legislation, academics, the judicial system, and so on. Society is gynocentric, and you coming in here and saying this is no different than Germans from WWII …
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:08 PM
1

yeah sure
/r/MensRights07/04/24 11:51 AM
12

How does men helping women of the past who weren't a part of their immediate family fit into this? What I'm saying is how feminists say that they're usually on their own, while the same patriarchal government they're against always assists them, gives them funding, scholarships, feeds them, helps nurse their young, builds shelters for them, and so on. Men helping out these women's interests is only good. Women, on the other hand, helping men's issues aren't happening because of their understandi…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:32 PM
17

Precisely. Feminism, hell most of progressivism, relies on wealthy rich men, the same men they constantly say that are oppressing them funds their causes. These assistances they get usually aren't genuine anyway, and are done so for sponsorship, business inquiries, and ballot farming.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:04 PM
11

You guys come in here calling us bitches, on a website that constantly bitches about men and misogyny. You guys are part of a group that is full of estrogen filled individuals. That's your whole niche.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:04 PM
1

You're so damn wrong. Ignoring your feminist nonsense, women get help from other men constantly. The women's rights marches would have never been beyond marches if it wasn't for the same patriarchy they dislike who assisted them further. Women usually only make other women feel better to participate in some sisterhood in group. Being that you're part of this same group, you're doing nothing but saying words and not helping your cause by being upset on some forum website, thinking that this is pr…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:30 PM
1

What the actual fuck are you talking about? Is English not your first language? Oh, shit another fake account. Lmao
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:29 AM
1

If women were in charge of every country that was involved in WWII it never would’ve gotten to that point. Again, you're admitting your genders hubris when it comes to strategic outcomes, because it basically demonises women. Bht if it was a positive incentive, you'll basically say that women can be just as capable as men, right? But sine it's not possible that women can be just as upset and capable, then you're also saying that women shouldn't be leaders in anything. You wouldn't just allow oth…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:20 AM
–

Please get you're fucking femcel and out of here and find some Roman e novel to entertaining yourself, you dumb ass woman. You're here so confident in yourself with your midandry, you shit heads are allowed to be this benign thanks to men. You women are allowed to do things in society because of men. Men are the ones who gave you that devi e you're using yo talk shit. Men are the ones that gave you your rights and can take them away. So before you troll on you're feminists ramblings about men ca…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:05 AM
–

What are you talking about? It would seek that you're some Uber or Lyft driver. So what if a few men lack basic, personal hygiene? Making this out to be some gendered issue of hygiene sounds no better than if guys started to say how women should wear tampons often. If men were saying these things to women, we'd be labeled as misogynists.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 02:37 AM
–

I see that statistic put up all over the place where does that come from? It's from a variety of surveys from dating websites and the likes, such as Tinder, OkCupid, Bumble, etc. Basically, there were social studies on the attraction men got on these dating sites, and each of then had similar results with attraction, masculine, domineering men got more notices, while mundane men were less noticed. This isn't too surprising to me, but most people would like to believe that personality and some Di…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:52 AM
–

Human beings need each other. It's how society usually functions. This bullshit you're saying has very condescending feelings to it. You're saying that men should learn basic hygiene, and saying how we're usually more unhygienic than women. Imagine telling women to clean themselves in certain areas when it comes to dating advice and mutual relationships, and then saying that that's all they'll need instead of a significant other. You sound like another oppressed concern troll, tbh. You guys are …
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:37 AM
3

Women are selective creatures, men have to understand certsin askects of themselves abd who would fut their interests before getting a significant other and so on. There is nothing weird about what the OP said. Some of you people cannot love without your delusions. The world isn't some Disney film. Sadly, people nowadays cannot fathom that.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:25 AM
–

Man. Women like you cannot go a day without starting meaningless bull, huh?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter