TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

smokeyriviera Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by smokeyriviera on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Nah, the results of a sexual encounter can mean any number of things, from either one being a victim, abuser, whore, player, whatever other labels we want to place on people. In this case some females have used sex to advance their careers unfairly at the expense of others who might be more talented. Others who Weinstein had encounters with came out as victims. It really depends on the encounter, and what happens during and after. Weinstein had a number of other options of turning people into st…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:37 PM
6

Depends whether you believe Harvey Weinstein used sex for career advancement or not. They used sex for better paying roles.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:12 PM
2

A 10 year old with a machine gun could kill the strongest man alive, pretty sure women would just use weapons or machines if they need something strong
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:52 PM
1

She didn't have a reputation as a religious singer because no one had heard of her, so for you to say her life style change affected her reputation is false. Further, since her reputation change she has had success, accolades and a career that she would never have had singing religious music. Further I had no idea to your reference, which is wrong still considering for the majority of her early pop career she had long hair, and its only a recent style change that she will probably change soon.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:37 AM
1

Fuck knows guessing it's a reference to trap houses (crack houses I believe) and the sort of people who hang out in them. I was more pissed off with the fact that religion implies wholesomness, and moving away from that is supposedly bad. I'm glad you provided the context I'm to lazy write.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:12 PM
0

Yep but is that argument gonna work against someone calling her a trap thing? He will just call her a feminist slut, where as he has no argument to money because it is what he would do.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 06:53 PM
11

Theres no money in religious music, you would do the same
/r/MensRights04/04/18 02:41 PM
2

Because the next biggest city has 10% of the people? So therefore if there are 10 attacks in Brmingham, then proportionally theres going to be 100 in London. And its the capital of Britain, so making it likely to be the capital of anything in Britain
/r/MensRights03/03/18 04:17 PM
3

Yeah I can see that, there is a lot of advocacy especially on this paper for extreme socialist ideas, such as 100% inheritance tax articles. However, that is a completely different idea to state control of means of production and product sharing en masse. If a paper ran an article stating their position is to get rid of capitalism in its current form and replace it with state run communism, then I doubt their readership would stay with them, especially a broadsheet such as the Guardian. I'd almo…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:22 AM
2

Don't conflate left wing progressive with communism, when it is clearly a very seperate idea, which the Guardian very rarely advocates for. The Guardian is officially a Lib Dem supporter, its just Corbyn is the closest to their ideals now. And even saying that they are not universal in their flattery of Corbyn, nor their support
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:12 AM
8

Quote the Equality Act 2010 which states that all individuals should be provided access to services both public and private. Plus, unless you receive all three verbal, written and final warnings then legally they have to keep you employed. (I believe IANAL)
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:29 AM
2

Thanks, sorry I couldnt reply to your comment, it was completely fair enough, tbh I just enjoy provoking arguements and debates here, and people are right more often than me so give them credit. He was correct more obviously than and so in so were you. I even agreed with you about DRM when asked about it at other occasions, so I myself was in a contradictory position which is what I accused you of. Anyways cheers
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:39 PM
1

Yep Netflix doesn't help, but they publish more than one side, theres multiple sides and they just don't push this one at the moment. And cool I agree with that much more than what I said.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:12 PM
1

Weed, it gets me interested in your point of view. Nope not mutually exclusive at all, just seems that cancelling Netflix is a poor way to express freedom of expression. Strawman arguement, I stated that in response to the posters statement about freedom of speech, and that by not paying he was defending free speech. So in turn I said that by deleting an account was insulating himself from companies that oppose his opinions. Freedom of speech allows people to be heard, but he didnt want to liste…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:47 PM
2

I was simply saying that torrenting was riskier than netflix, I will still believe that to be true no matter what country you are in unless their is compelling evidence to change my mind. UI is fair, I myself find it much easier than every other streaming service, plus its far smoother than most torrenting sights, but that is my own opinion and your allowed your own fair enough. My main complaint was the statement of cancelling a Netflix subscription as freedom of expression. I never presumed to…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:40 PM
6

Every company that shows TV shows decides what you can and cant see, so there is no other tv company that is any better in that sense. Torrenting is simpler, but riskier, plus the UI of Netflix is as good if not better than competitors. Finally if your passionate about defending free speech then there are surely much more important issues, than cancelling Netflix due to their not showing a documentary? Why not campaign against travel bans, oppression against women in middle eastern countries, or…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:05 PM
3

If the women believes that you taking the dominant commanding role is in the best interest for both of you it can work. Sorry if this doesn't fully agree with red pill philosophy, never posted here before
/r/TheRedPill30/06/16 01:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter