TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

snark_o_matic Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by snark_o_matic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I think both gender roles and women's emphasized fear of strange men are both largely social constructs, both with weak merits, especially as male and female labor participation rates converge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 08:02 PM
11

80% of homicide victims are men. 65% of those male victims are killed by strangers. 10% of female victims are killed by strangers. Even though it's 26 times (80/20 * 65/10) more likely that men will be killed by strangers, we haven't normalized men's fear of strangers, which is interesting. In the USA in 2021, about 1,000 men were killed by intimate partners, and about 600 women were killed by strangers. Men will generally protect and defend women. Most people are basically good, so it's a numbe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 07:22 PM
0

The core problem isn’t female privilege or feminism. It’s that masculinity is rigid and unforgiving. Men are expected to initiate, perform confidence, be economically independent, and never show vulnerability. Autism directly conflicts with those expectations, and society punishes autistic men for failing a role they didn’t design. Autistic men need more targeted support, social coaching that isn’t shaming, employment paths that don’t depend on charisma, and communities that don’t treat romantic…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:02 AM
1

Yeah, I was baiting out the admission of the premise that there is a huge difference for job loss, based only on gender. Or, it is perhaps not so cut and dry; at least one study found that when a wife loses her job, the likelihood of divorce actually decreases. In any case, there's a pretty obvious gender divide around that issue that manifests in many different ways.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 04:55 AM
5

Any adult is expected to solve their own problems of a car breaking down, losing a job, or not having enough rent money. Those are not gendered issues. Men who experience job loss are about 33% more likely to divorce within a year, as one example of how losing a job is clearly a gendered issue. There is, of course, no correlation with divorce for women who lose their job. I'm curious why you think it isn't a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 09:24 PM
11

A lot more of the deaths in the lower incomes are deaths of despair, which obviously bring the average life expectancy down for men especially.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:15 AM
8

96% of my dates would've found it infantilizing if I tried to pay for everything (like you're trying to buy them, or you pity their financial situation, etc.), so if what he says is statistically accurate, I must date better women than most people.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 08:55 PM
3

Australians be sexist. Apples and oranges re: USA numbers.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:59 AM
6

This is probably a complete misinterpretation of the facts. It's not a misinterpretation; there's a reason childless women is specified. The wage gap has for the most part long been, to put it simply, a "motherhood penalty." Equal parenthood roles would probably virtually eliminate the gender wage gap, but usually when couples have kids, the parents don't have the same exact priorities around child care, money, and career. It's just gender roles. I hate gender roles myself, but that's out of my …
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:11 AM
11

So it’s women’s faults that men are drug addicted underachievers? Got it. No one said that. Intentionally inflammatory, I guess. DESPITE patriarchy women are excelling. Who’s the stronger sex? "Men are inherently inferior to women" is a hot take. The reason men take risky jobs is they are too lazy to get an education. So in other words, gender roles don't exist. It's curious because this is actually an argument that there is no patriarchy. It's a little weird to use that to support the thesis th…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:01 PM
2

It's true that if you allow a group of people to behave badly and get away with it, then some of them will. Men can generally physically overpower women, though. Whether he uses it or not, it's undeniably there. Therefore, it's less acceptable if a man behaves threateningly to a woman, due to the implied threat of force. I don't like any part of it, but the logical conclusion is that women will continue to be more scared of men in private, while men will be harassed more in public. It's two gros…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 05:41 PM
2

For most adult men today, a shared childhood experience (~3 years old and onward) was being told by most or all adults that crying is for babies or girls. This was proven out: When girls cried, they received sympathy. A crying boy was simply seen as weak, and usually punished for the outburst. Everyone was taught that boys needed to "man up." Even in relatively progressive areas, this is probably still the norm. It's abusive of course, but psychopaths are advantaged in an amoral world so perhaps…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 04:54 PM
9

None of it is inherently empowering or bad. Wanting physical attraction is rational. Cooking is a perk. Same with money.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 07:07 PM
11

It's just extra skin. You know, like your eyelids.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:17 PM
18

There wouldn't need to be this sort of justice if false rape accusations didn't ruin people's lives. Can't expect people to stop publishing information on the accused as long as it's legal, can't really expect the law to change, and can't really expect society to give the accused the benefit of the doubt. If just one of those things did happen, the false claims would virtually disappear as they would have little power. It's harder to prove false accusations than actual rapes, which criminals lar…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:12 PM
15

Yeah, it's demonization of men. Women do have some stake in it, though. It's basically slut shaming. Suddenly, if a girl has a drink and has sex and doesn't think it was rape, then she's "internalizing her oppression." Or if she likes being dominated/tied up. Or blowjobs. Or porn. Or nudity. Or attention. It's a subversive attack on women's autonomy, desires and intelligence. Men and women should be able to come together and dismantle this radical bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:28 PM
28

Nothing hotter than timidly asking a girl if you're still not raping her every few minutes. Whole concept of this overprotective nonsense is like a war on women getting satisfied in bed.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:18 PM
3

What this says is that if you're a girl, then it's generally legal to coerce emotionally fragile boys into committing suicide. I don't have false rape accusation stats on hand or know much about the UK in general, but a lot of us have met one or two twisted girls in high school. The more they realize they can easily do this stuff, the worse it gets.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:03 PM
12

That's the point.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter