snorkleboy Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
–	What feminism would stand for if they were for equality Like putting it up got adoption?	/r/MensRights	19/02/17 05:06 PM
1	All-female team submits study on PhD sexism, shocked to be asked to add a male voice. None taken. If you want to make up your own definitions, more power to you. Your probably always right that way.	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 09:51 PM
1	All-female team submits study on PhD sexism, shocked to be asked to add a male voice. Thanks for a small dose of sanity.	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 08:47 PM
-1	All-female team submits study on PhD sexism, shocked to be asked to add a male voice. What? Sociology: Sociology is the scientific study of social behaviour, including its origins, development, organization, and institutions.[1] It is a social science that uses various methods of empirical investigation[2] and critical analysis[3] to develop a body of knowledge about social order, social disorder and social change. They were not studying them selves, but other people through a survey that they, as scientists, conducted. That is why they are getting peer reviewed in the first plac…	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 08:31 PM
-1	All-female team submits study on PhD sexism, shocked to be asked to add a male voice. I dont know how you can say this: it appears likely that the authors almost certainly made errors with regard to Social Desirability Bias, and - if other "studies" that purport to find sexism are any guide - may have also made errors with regard to Area Bias, Self-Selection Bias, and Leading Question Bias. Whilst also saying this (we can't know that without reading the paper itself) Because you were not able to • Check to see if there are any do obvious sources of bias in the data. Look at how t…	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 05:38 PM
1	All-female team submits study on PhD sexism, shocked to be asked to add a male voice. Suggesting diversified viewpoints would be one way of remedying this Another way would be to just fix the methodology. I think thats a much more direct solution than forcing new members into the group in the hopes that they would want to use better methodology. At this point your basically accusing them of lying by purposesfully tampering with standard methodology. Either way dismissing science becuase of who is doing it is inherently anti scientific. Its just a silly notion to begin with, and s…	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 05:00 PM
2	All-female team submits study on PhD sexism, shocked to be asked to add a male voice. They took a survey, a survey is designed to take away the personal bias in observation. Dont see how the results of the survey would be different if androgynous blind people did it.	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 04:35 PM
5	All-female team submits study on PhD sexism, shocked to be asked to add a male voice. The point of the scientific method is that anyone should be able to do the same experiment. 2 men,2 women, 2 computers should get the same results. Studies are done by all man teams all the time, about all subjects, what are you talking about? Objectivity is the basis of science, thays why it shouldnt matter whos doing the science. If it matters who the scientist is in an experiment, than the experiment was done wrong.	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 04:24 PM
1	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated tell me why a woman should be given priority if both women and men are equally qualified? I am in favour of affirmative action , as in supporting people who lack (and need) support to reach the particular level or standard they need to gain access to a particular institution. That's gender equality as the irrational belief that if the general populations is 51% female and 49% male, then every area of society - e.g. workplaces and politics - should also be 51% female and 49% male. I agree that Yo…	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 06:55 AM
1	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated "Discrimination is ok in some cases. Its ok if its backed up by a good goal. Its a well known practice world wide that if woman and man are equally qualified, woman should be given priority" Funny enough op said he stopped reading at 'discrimination is ok in some cases' too.	/r/MensRights	02/05/15 06:10 AM
1	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated If you read the picture again she explicitly says the man and woman are equally qualified.	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 10:46 PM
1	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated I'm not going to support a law that will put a capable, qualified person out of a chance to have a job so that a minority can fill the slot even when found incapable of performing it properly. If you read the picture again the man and woman are explicitly equally qualified in her example. No, just people who lend credence to a stupid idea of which you are doing... Anyway, I'm done. You're not worth the time Take it up with the justices in the supreme court then. Edit: gratz v bollinger	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 10:36 PM
1	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated You saying, like her, they should be adjusted according to who is the most harmed while invisible people like me should just grin and bear it for the rest of their lives? where did i say that? You want me to violate your human rights just because someone did it to me, even though you are not connected to who harmed my person? where did i say that? How about the basic fucking right to not be discriminated against or denied opportunities? The right to not have your gender used against you? Where d…	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 09:30 PM
1	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated my only point is that as a society we have agreed to abridge rights for good reasons.	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 09:21 PM
0	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated well there is the death penalty, as far as the right to life goes.	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 09:20 PM
1	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated If they are not absolute, then they are not rights. you cant say something is only a right if its absolute, and then go on to say when those absolute rights are limited. there is no such thing as absolute rights. You need a permit to have a weapon, there are things you cannot say or do in public, there are times and places you are not allowed to gather with people/protest, etc.	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 06:03 PM
-2	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated But in the context she was talking about jobs and promotions she was talking about affirmative action. I do not agree with it, but its a legitimate idea. googles definition: Affirmative action or positive discrimination (known as employment equity in Canada, reservation in India and Nepal, and positive action in the UK) is the policy of favoring members of a disadvantaged group who suffer from discrimination within a culture. she said perfectly reasonable things, even if you disagree with them. …	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 05:58 PM
2	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated I take it your not a fan of affirmative action?	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 02:39 PM
4	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated The right of movement is considered a basic human right. liberty itself is considered a basic human right. I dont know how you think someone living as a prisoner could be said to be enjoying all his basic human rights.	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 02:36 PM
-11	Apparently, discrimination is OK if men are the ones who are discriminated going to prison violates plenty of human rights and we understand its necessary. Honestly she was saying something perfectly reasonable and you guys are circle jerking around the simplest interpretation of what she could mean.	/r/MensRights	01/05/15 02:21 PM