TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

snowplough77 Archive

View 1 post and 33 comments by snowplough77 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
64

Feminismsnowplough77/r/MensRights16/01/16 10:30 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Many, many posts are deemed "controversial" on this sub. That's what happens when you don't censor right-wingers and left-wingers and people who identify with neither wing of the political spectrum. So no, you're not special.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:30 AM
1

My hatred and anger at Muslims afforded me a rare opportunity to abdicate my position of moral superiority over those who fell the same as a result of seeing their countries being attacked. Don't ever think you did that, or any other such cockeyed fantasy. Again affirming a female stereotype, Allison, you're drawing attention to your obliviousness over the that your ill-considered words have probably already had serious effects. But you think it's all about you. How many stereotypes can we fit i…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:23 AM
1

Who is "them"? If the question is whether eg I feel "morally superior" to spooks during the Cold War who overthrew mildly liberal governments and instituted torture regimes, then yes. However I also recognize that most of the "foot soldiers" were simply doing their job and believed that they were "fighting communism." Numerous former CIA agents have spoken about this; and indeed numerous former drone pilots have spoken out about dropping bombs on wedding parties in Pakistan and Yemen. You honest…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:32 AM
1

If I admitted your moral correctness at the cost of being able to pursuading people to step away from a threat narrative towards Muslims should I admit you're correct? Of course not. The problem is that I believe in logical arguments. However if it's actually true that defending Muslims from attack amounts to attacking Muslims, then by all means attack me and I wish you much success. (I see you're starting to resort to force to get me to admit you're right.) Force? What? Next you'll accuse me of…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:15 AM
9

You're gonna get a ton of negative comments, but that's R/MensRights for yah. I mean this in a positive sense: if not for negative comments we would turn into a hivemind echo chamber like r/feminism. This sub doesn't discriminate based on political ideology, and even welcomes feminists if they are able to argue coherently. Most of the "leftist" subs have succumbed to feminist censorship. The anarchist Kropotkin, whom you cite, was a genius and presaged many later anthropologists and zoologists i…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:57 AM
1

Trying to get them to Submit to your moral condemnation will simply entrench battle lines and likely end with either superior social or physical force. Not necessarily. For example many white people came to recognize the error of their ways during the civil rights era due to both moral courage and some rather harsh moral condemnation by civil rights leaders. Of course pursuading them away from a threat narrative towards Muslims will require abdicating the moral high ground. I'm an avatar on the …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:35 AM
1

youre really invested in having me admit I'm wrong aren't you? Actually I am. Because I would hate to see the Honey Badgers go the way of Stormfront. I have supported you guys financially and frequently link to your videos (Karen, yourself, Dr. Rand etc.)
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:31 AM
1

how can I accept your moral condemnation to your satisfaction? Do you think that it's morally wrong to hate a huge group of people based on the actions of a few? Do you condemn collective punishment? Then why are we arguing? Of course you should acknowledge that you got carried away with your emotions and said some awful things. How would you feel if I made a video titled "I hate Jewish Woman" if I was raped by Germaine Greer? Admitting error is not a sign of weakness. Is is often a sign of stre…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:22 AM
1

No. I hate injustice, but life is too short to hate entire groups of people. Some of the people in the groups I listed may have been malicious, some may have been acting for a perceived greater good or "lesser evil."
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:13 AM
3

Acknowledging you have negative emotions as a result of having had negative experiences with a group of people is hate speech? You didn't just "acknowledge negative emotions," you expressed hatred toward all Muslim men. I have had very, very negative experiences with certain non-whites (I am white). For example, as a teenager I had my head cracked open via a tire iron by a group of Chinese born gang members in Vancouver. Do I now hate all Chinese men? Of course not. Your hatred is a sign of ment…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:40 AM
2

Then your respect was misplaced. I understand your need to condemn me and walk away. It wasn't misplaced. I've listened to most of the HB broadcasts and always felt you to be a passionate and eloquent advocate for men and boys. I also noticed previously that you stuck up for Muslim men and boys by pointing out that -- despite the many faults of these societies -- males have it at least as bad as females. That viewpoint is very much contrary to traditional conservative narratives, which may not b…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:07 AM
1

Feel free to feel morally superior to me. I understand your need to. It's not just a feeling, unless you subscribe to moral relativism. I'm not the one who just made a video titled "I hate Muslim Man." I don't make videos about how much I hate Jews or Christians or atheists either. This may come as a surprise to you but I'm a fan, or at least was. I have linked to your videos eg "Princess and Plowhorse" numerous times. That's why I found your new video so depressing. Hating on hundreds of millio…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:51 AM
1

you're thinking of first wave feminism, which accomplished everything it set out to accomplish about fifty years ago. equality of opportunity for both genders. THIS IS GOOD NEWS! Alas, not even this is true. First wave feminists gave women the right to vote without any civic obligations, such as being subject to conscription. They "reformed" property rights so that married women could keep all of the property they earned, but at the same time would be entitled to their husband's property. They p…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:40 AM
3

But also we often don't treat people as objects when they think we do. If you are sexually attracted to a picture of a woman, you are seeing her as an object. The other way around too, if it's a picture of a man seen by a woman. But when you are sexually attracted to your girlfriend, you don't suddenly forget her human side. You can't objectify people easily if you know them very well, that's just a myth. Wasn't there a study showing that when a man sees a naked woman he regards her as more vuln…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:10 AM
1

I think it would be worthwhile showing her counter-information, eg some Karen Straughan videos. The problem is that most feminists seem to be utterly impervious to logic. Some have even gone so far as to say that rationality is a patriarchal construct and that subjective feelings represent a "higher" realm of truth. This would be fine and well if they didn't wield the power of the state. If her opinions harden after gently showing her the info, get out and get out fast. It's one thing to have a …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:01 AM
1

Also, do the elite break down their own family structures? The old blue blood old money types are very much interested in lineage. They embrace non-conspicuous consumption and tend to stay in the shadows. The great banking families, for example. They make your average rich CEO look like a pauper. Michael Parenti wrote an interesting article about this called "the super-rich are out of sight." http://www.michaelparenti.org/Superrich.html
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:17 AM
1

Tribalism would seem to be the answer. Elites, who form their own sort of tribe, exploit this instinct to divide and conquer populations. The Syrian refugee crisis is a perfect example of this. Western elites armed and funded Islamist radicals to destabilize the Assad regime; all hell broke less; now Europe is "welcoming" scores of angry young brown Muslim men willing to work for pennies who can be blamed for various problems that elites themselves created. When the economy goes to shit you have…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:01 AM
3

I'm not a fan of critiquing every film from some sort of ideological perspective. Just look at the feminists: they are never happy with how women are portrayed in entertainment. The result is that suspension of disbelief is becoming increasingly difficult, especially for action movies (where 90 pound females take on 20 guys at once). They seem to forget that female power comes from a completely different place than male power, and that there have always been "strong women" in cinema. I do think …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 01:51 AM
2

Is this a men's rights website or a "kill all the brown men" website?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 01:43 AM
4

The nutcracker thing is part of it -- which may explain why feminists are so intent on getting us to sit like females (they don't call feminists ball busters for nothing) -- but it's also due to male physiology. Our hips are shaped differently and we are much more top heavy. The next time you're on a bus, try sitting with your legs together and with no other support. You will topple over at the first turn, and yes your balls will hurt as well. It is mindboggling that it has taken this long for s…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 01:31 AM
1

Both of these misconceptions are examples of the sexes projecting their own desires onto the other. Yep. Men don't give a flying fuck if a woman is "accomplished." High intelligence is actually attractive (to me anyway), but not a deal breaker. Certainly I'm not intimidated by intelligent women; in fact I had a two-year relationship with a virtual genius who had me beat by a solid 30 IQ points. I've never in my life met a man who turned into a quivering mess in the face of an intelligent woman. …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 12:32 AM
9

The act of a male breathing? Nah, I'm sure they could come up with something.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:57 PM
1

I never implied … I’m afraid you most certainly did imply exactly that. I'm just saying that said activities are not limited to Muslims. This should be obvious. Right. Not limited to Muslims. Which is true. I never said that all Muslims were innocent of X. The fact that interethnic rape, murder, loot and genocide ravaged Rwanda in the mid-1990s is true, but wholly irrelevant to the fact that very similar levels of interethnic violence were being conducted thousands of miles away in the former Yu…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:52 PM
15

I'm honestly undecided over whether these women are simply too stupid to understand very basic concepts relating to anatomy and physics or whether they're too juvenile and spiteful to admit error. The level of snark and goofy wordplay (bro this, man that) reminds of snotty children, not well-developed adults. Certainly they should not be writing for major news publications.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:40 PM
-1

I can't imagine how sick a person would have to be to hate hundreds of millions of people. Alison laments the caste system in Saudi Arabia. I wonder if she hates the Christian and Atheist men in the United States and Britain who have been propping up the Saudi regime over the last several decades, and have furnished that regime with arms to repress dissidents and bomb people in Yemen. I wonder if she hates the Christian and Atheist men in the Central Intelligence Agency who for decades have supp…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:18 PM
1

Probably not. Like I said(or implied rather), this is an irrational feeling on my part. That's really not an excuse. Quite a few radical feminists, I reckon, were raped or molested by men; does that justify hatred against all men? I also reckon that quite a few racists had bad experiences with the target of their hatred. Is a Palestinian justified in hating all Jews because his family was blown up in an IDF attack? It's interesting that you apparently have empathy for Pakistani boys, but not Pak…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:32 PM
1

Making that statement is like saying the Mafia are hardly exclusive to Sicilian-Italians - there’s an element of truth in it, but it misses the wider point that large numbers of Mafiosi really are recruited from a specific part of the population where that particular culture is fostered. I never implied that a small number of Muslims in Britain and elsewhere [usually impoverished urban youth] aren't engaged in these activities. I'm just saying that said activities are not limited to Muslims. Thi…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:20 PM
2

Sounds more like organized crime than anything else. The act of gangs pimping out younger girls is hardly exclusive to Muslims. Hell the British establishment itself has apparently been doing far worse with kids in state care, and there too the police turned a blind eye. In fact cops and security services are sometimes involved in organized crime.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:47 AM
4

"I don't give two fucks about Muslim men." How compassionate. "Male refugees should be...forced to swim back to their snakepits, with a bucket of chum strapped to their backs." That's outright hate speech against Muslims. Surprising to see Alison talking like this. "I don't care about Muslim men, but I do care about men." Til Muslim men are not men. The idea that Western governments owe no obligation to Syrian refugees would be fine, if it weren't for the fact that Western governments have been …
/r/MensRights16/01/16 08:12 AM
1

MRA's -- at last half of them anyway -- are completely okay with promoting misandry, gynocenntrism, "rape culture" myths, rape hysteria, lack of due process, patriarchy myths etc. when it comes to the world's 1.5 billion Muslims. Their hatred and bigotry toward the target group surpasses their commitment to men's rights, to the point where they will actually promote feminist ideas and arguments.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:02 AM
3

Islamic men were to blame so now they're banned. Yes, let's paint all Islamic men as rapists due to the alleged, as yet unproven actions of a few. What other group does that? I can think of two: feminists and fascists.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:27 AM
1

You're making the exact same arguments that feminists make. But you think it's okay because the targets come from an out-group. So much for MRA's supporting due process and rejecting rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 05:47 AM
4

This sub does not consistently support men's rights when it comes to non-Western men and boys. There is a strong desire to demonize Muslims in particular. Nothing new about this of course. Most cultures do it. It's sort of like the "one good man" syndrome applied to international affairs.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter