TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

snyper7 Archive

View 0 posts and 107 comments by snyper7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

0.002 and 0.2% are the same thing. (255018/124358656)×100 is about 20%. Although with conventional order of operations, the way you have it written (255018/124358656×100), you're actually multiplying the denominator by 100. 'percent' literally means per hundred, so when we ask 'what percentage of men are arrested for violent crime?', we're asking, 'for every hundred men, how many are arrested for violent crime?' Kind of. Percentages are dimensionless. It's a notation for a ratio. The word "perce…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/23 08:47 AM
1

Why did you multiply by 100 on slide four?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/23 07:00 AM
1

transphobic, racist, anti-immigrant, mildly misogynistic Sounds like you're just throwing buzzwords out and hoping people think the people who disagree with you are a BIG MEAN BAD. You should try "homophobic," "abelist," "fatphobic," "neurotypical," "anti-vegan," "misogynoir," "stinky," "tax-evading," "islamophobic," and "colonialist" and see if some of those stick too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/22 08:15 PM
23

Women have a very powerful movement making excuses for everything they do, though. That's a very important difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 11:05 PM
12

And we should have that without being used as a tool for someone else's peaceful night out with the girls. There's nothing "peaceful" about a screaming bachelorette party.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 11:55 PM
2

Especially if we want them to be spaces of culture. It's a bar, not MoMA.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 11:53 PM
10

Just FYI, "prospective" and "perspective" mean different things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/21 11:02 PM
5

You think men are most likely to survive war?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 08:52 AM
1

Just looked up Headblade. I don't shave my head, but if I did I'd use those. I love the idea of running a little snowmobile-looking razor over my head like a Tech Deck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 05:59 PM
0

And we're definitely in a situation right now where the middle class cannot afford to purchase anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/21 07:00 PM
2

Right, we all know that Amazon has no revenue because nobody can afford to buy anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/21 09:48 AM
-8

On an even deeper level, work becoming an ethical thing is an absurdity on its own. Fucking lol. Sorry sweetheart, but someday you're going to have to get a job. You know how you have food to eat? Well someone has to do work for that to happen. You know when you fall off your throne and get an owie? The doctor you see afterward is at work (and I know you may view them as such, but the doctor actually isn't a slave). You know how you have electricity, clean water, and a house to live in? People d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 05:28 PM
-3

They can only afford one car, two HDTVs, and three iPhones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 05:21 PM
3

We all naturally prefer the lives and comfort of women. Women prefer women. Men prefer women. Speak for yourself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/20 02:33 AM
3

He's a far-right marxist? Riiiiight...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/20 06:23 PM
3

The idea that men can't experience emotions is just toxic masculinity rebranded "Feminists denying that men experience emotions is proof of masculinity's toxicity!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/20 06:03 PM
14

Another dumbass insisted that the only reason why gender-segregated sports were a thing was because "men were afraid of how badly they would be beaten if women were allowed to compete with them in sports". Fun fact: most sports actually don't have a men's league. They have a women's league and an "everyone" league. If men were actually afraid of being beaten by women, they'd segregate sports. But men clearly aren't afraid of that, because men's sports don't exist. It just happens that very, very…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/20 01:42 AM
19

Feminists have a stranglehold on gender-related legislation. This will only get worse under regulation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/20 10:32 PM
8

Are we looking at the same website? There's a whole section labeled "Men" (and there isn't one specifically targeting women). The posters target the wrong demographic, but the website seems pretty great.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 01:31 AM
2

Those are just RePhone kits in plastic cases. They didn't even replace the stock green paper case. I have one sitting on my desk. Also - why is this here? So what if someone puts together a crappy "product" that 99% of attendees at MWC completely ignore?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:31 AM
2

Wow this is sad. Really makes me feel for my brothers.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/16 06:50 AM
1

Well these responses are damn disappointing.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:47 PM
1

hatred plethora of willing mentors and getting job offers while walking down the street These two statements are not mutually exclusive. Plenty of people with great jobs are absolutely loathed by most people. Plenty of kings have been murdered in violent uprisings by their own people. You can get a job offer (i.e. - be valued for your skills) or be offered mentoring (i.e. - be valued for your potential skills) while at the same time being generally despised. I understand your "walking down the s…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:40 PM
2

That's weird. Seems like it'd be more costly to design two different locker rooms than to build the exact same room twice and just modify the toilet area. That's how my school's locker rooms were when I was in college. As far as shower styles go: I genuinely don't care one way or the other, but I can see how other guys would. I have zero qualms with being naked around other dudes, and the individual stalls are fine too. I honestly have no idea what women prefer - or if they even have a strong pr…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:26 AM
2

Angry Orchard+Fireball. It's actually pretty good.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:53 PM
3

Totally agree, but penises are seen as icky and scary, so it'll be a steep uphill battle. One thing I noticed is that you mention the penis a few times, but there's a lot more to it than that. Testicles, prostate, the manifolds in-between it all, ... All of it requires attention and deserves respect and education. Guys need to be aware of testicular cancer and how to check for it (and that's actually something that younger guys should pay attention to). Guys should know about prostate health bey…
/r/MensRights10/10/14 11:00 PM
5

Penises look awesome. I don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 04:26 AM
2

Definitely creepy.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:25 AM
3

I agree that the reverse wouldn't be accepted on nearly the same level, but there is plenty of cartoon porn of both the male and the female characters (just search for "Disney princess porn" or any variation on that and I'm sure you'll find tons of Disney pussy). I don't really see either as an inherently bad thing, but I do think the way some people shame men for enjoying erotic imagery is a problem. That's something to talk about. Those are also some weird looking dicks. There's only like one …
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:07 AM
2

Ouch.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:39 PM
5

As men, we can be happy with the sort of life you described for her (i.e. basically just existing and saving). Can we? I know I enjoy looking forward to buying a new car someday, or buying a new game every once in a while, or getting some other shiny new toy. Men enjoy things too.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:10 PM
5

Though the entire definition seems gender neutral The "threats" section isn't.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:09 PM
3

That was weirdly homophobic. Taking irrelevant potshots at Denton kinda distracted from the actual content of the article.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:10 PM
1

When we were together he was a reserve officer working on becoming a "real" (not reserve) officer, so he was hyper-professional around most of his coworkers. He was out to some of the officers he was particularly close with, but he wasn't out to everyone. That was about four years ago, and we largely lost touch after we broke up, so I'm not sure how out he is now. I imagine he opened up a lot more after he became a real officer, but I can't be sure. He was definitely out to all of his friends (o…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:15 AM
2

Cops are a bit of a different breed of male I know that well. My second boyfriend was a cop. I suppose that's reasonable given your friend's son's experience. Still - I'm pretty adamantly against it. Plus the fact that all his friends that had boys had all gone through it. I think that's somewhat thinner reasoning. I've never bought the whole "locker rooms will be awkward" argument. Locker rooms are awkward anyway, and for 95+% of his life, the other guys in the locker room aren't going to care …
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:08 PM
2

It's not really a topic that's ever been brought up during lunch with coworkers at Chipotle. Really? What... what do you talk about then? In more seriousness - I think as guys get more conscious about it, they tend to be more against it. I'm gay and most of my friends are other gay dudes, so I suppose we're more aware of penises than the average straight guy and that's probably why the topic has come up more frequently for me. But yeah - I'd say almost universally (with some very notable excepti…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:52 PM
4

I don't think I've ever heard a guy say they wish they weren't. Really? I think most of the guys I know wish they hadn't been circumcised. I know a few who have even gotten political about anti-circumcision.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:37 PM
2

He has a pretty solid idea for movie theaters too.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:59 PM
2

Something like this?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:42 AM
2

I think the point is that this attitude is engrained in society: that men and fathers are incompetent jokesters and women and mothers are infinitely responsible and nurturing. This image itself isn't the problem, but it is absolutely evidence of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:02 PM
1

msm?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:12 AM
7

You don't shower every day because it's too much work?
/r/MensRights26/03/14 07:08 PM
1

Got it.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:03 AM
1

Uhhh what? Are you for real?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:49 PM
1

Gay men DO get treated as lesser beings at times too and I feel this is a constructive thing. Maybe I'm not reading you correctly, but how is that a constructive thing?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:47 PM
5

he propositioned me Is "propositioned" really the word he means here. So a guy asked him if he wanted to fool around, he said no, and now he's shaken and understands how it feels to have been raped? That's really strange, and might speak a little to his perspective. Unless he doesn't actually mean "propositioned," and was really talking about being physically forced into sex. Also, the Ouch! Don't sit down for a while. line rubbed me the wrong way for some reason. Not really sure why.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:15 PM
1

That is very well put.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:27 PM
2

In a connected way, anyone with issues of steroid abuse or "bigorexia" are rarely treated with anything but the kind of scorn reserved for male vanity. I think that's something that really deserves a lot more focus. The vast majority of "pleasant-looking male" in media are guys with are at least pretty muscular, and almost all presentations of attractive men to gay men are guys whose bodies are the product of both very lucky genetics and of strict fitness and diet regimens. When the standard for…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 02:02 AM
1

15% of gay or bisexual men have struggled with disordered eating habits throughout their lives I'm surprised it's that low.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:53 AM
1

This whole article is really strange, and a lot of it reads as really outdated. The first thing that jumped out at me was the gender-neutral phrasing in the title ("lessons your son's future spouse will thank you..."), but the strongly gendered content. For some reason she goes out of her way to refer to his "spouse," but can't conceive that her son might 1) end up with another man or 2) never get married at all. It's all very strange and antiquated. Thought that was weird. That and the creepy "…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 01:26 AM
1

boys usually want to grow up to be men, not women. Misogyny!
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:50 AM
1

That's fair. I imagine it wasn't so much dependence on the substance as it was dependence on the ability to escape with the help of the substance.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:18 PM
8

pot Pot!? You were addicted to pot?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:48 PM
2

I don't think many laws favor women over men VAWA
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:09 PM
5

she got him cut after he was born when I wasn't paying attention That's one of the most horrific things I've read in a long time.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:54 AM
1

women are better safer drivers Is that actually the case? I remember reading somewhere that men were more often involved in accidents, but it's because men drive considerably more than women do and that men and women are either equally safe drivers, or men were even slightly safer.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:26 AM
14

My wife and her sister were the most adament that it shouldn't even be a conversation and that of course all boys should be circumcised because uncircumcised penises are ugly. Uncut dick is awesome. They don't know what they're talking about. Additionally, if that's their argument, then why not mandate other cosmetic surgeries? Many straight guys like big tits, right? Every girl should have to get a boob-job! Who cares about the ones who don't want one, or about the people who aren't into huge t…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:49 PM
1

What exactly is the male equivalent of lingerie? http://www.aussiebum.com/
/r/MensRights26/12/13 04:16 PM
1

Troll? Are you serious? You're the one who's arguing that people should be fired for mentioning major life events, like marriage, to their coworkers - and I'm the troll?
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:37 AM
1

I usually got pumpkin stickers.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:11 AM
1

Take this story, for instance. Which story causes a headache? The one about how you're vague about which cities you visit? And no, it's not up to them to keep me in the dark, I'm just illustrating that my lack of desire to hear about someone's gay marriage is exactly equal to my lack of desire to hear about someone else's hetero marriage. Cool - that's fine. You aren't required to hear anything at work that isn't required by your job (or in any other aspect of your life, for that matter). But th…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:18 AM
1

From my perspective, it's a bigger issue that people who're attracted to features that aren't considered stereotypically attractive feel unable to express their preferences. One of my good friends is a self-identified chubby-chaser. He's really into fat guys (like really fat guys), but he only shares this with some close friends because, among the mainstream, he's seen as bizarre. I don't share or understand his attraction, but I certainly respect it. I think part of the solution to this problem…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:53 PM
2

Unfortunately, there needs to be a quantifiable aspect of performance measurement somewhere in education.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:13 PM
3

good old girls clubs Ha ha. I like that.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:07 PM
7

Also, the article pointed out that male teachers grade female students more harshly and vice versa so that obstacle remains. Unless I misread, I believe the article pointed out that male teachers graded female students fairly: It also revealed that girls tried harder if they had a male teacher because they believed they would get better marks. Their suspicions were not borne out, though, as the male teachers tended to give them exactly the same marks as the external examiners. So female students…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:05 PM
1

It sounds like your workplace is dreadfully sterile. Either that, or you're the weird guy who doesn't interact with any of his coworkers and considers morale events "a hindrance to productivity" and responds to "where'd you go on vacation?" with "you have no right to know that. Stop harassing me." If you don't want to know anything about your coworkers, ignore them. It's not on them to ensure that you're left in the dark about everything but your own home life. Just because you're violently agai…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:17 AM
1

You realize this media disaster wasn't caused by his marriage, it was caused by the fact that they fired him. "Employee gets married" is never, ever going to be a headline. "Employee gets fired for getting married" clearly is a headline.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:10 AM
1

Do you actually believe that straight people deserve to be fired for telling people they work with that they got married? Do you really believe that?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:38 AM
1

You don't see a good reason why your life outside of work might come up at work? A coworker has never asked "how was your weekend?" And DADT was actually remarkably similar to the situation you're talking about. You keep going back to "grabbing for attention" and "loudly announcing" when everyone who seems to have any background on this situation is saying that the administration merely found out about his personal life. That's very similar to persecution under DADT. Again - it's very frustratin…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:37 AM
2

You shouldn't have to hide personal issues at work either. People have personal lives and pretending that you're two different people is neither healthy nor something that any normal employee does. Gay employees shouldn't have to hide their lives any more than straight employees should. Most people know when a teacher/coworker/employee gets married. A big reason why the DADT repeal was important was because gay soldiers were essentially incapable of having personal lives at all, because it's imp…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:57 AM
10

I forgot where I heard this, but it goes something along the lines of, "Men socialize by insulting each other, but they don't really mean it. Women socialize by complementing each other, but they don't mean it either." Personally, I'd take the former over the latter any day.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:50 PM
1

Ha ha ha ha. Okay - that was actually fairly funny.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 07:07 PM
2

I believe you and /u/VoodooIdol is agreeing with you, and you are both disagreeing with /u/IFuckedYourFather. He's refuting the "wouldn't all men then declare the child is unwanted?" hypothetical.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:45 AM
1

I think the disconnect here is that you assume that every sexual relationship is stable, is mutually respectful, and is between two people with the emotional maturity to answer important, complex questions like "are we capable of being parents?" and "do our expectations and goals align? If they don't, how can we reconcile them?". Many sexual relationships don't have those qualities.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:32 AM
1

You're not always in a "relationship" where you've made an adequate appraisal of your partner's motives and mental stability - sometimes people just fuck.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:24 AM
1

No form of birth control is 100% effective, people lie about birth control, and people make mistakes. A failure or lack of birth control shouldn't destroy anyone's life or livelihood, especially when we have technology (and, ideally, societal and legal mechanisms) for reversing errors in birth control. It's analogous to saying "we shouldn't treat chlamydia/gonorrhea/HPV/HIV because you had the option of having safe sex."
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:22 AM
2

Women aren't allowed to wear ties, they're for men. That doesn't make any sense. Women are "allowed" to wear pretty much whatever they want. It's incredibly common for women to wear a pantsuit to look professional, just as it's common for women to wear a skirt or dress and look professional. This isn't even an argument you can make. It's not that "women aren't allowed to wear ties," it's that "men aren't allowed to not wear ties." Women can wear pretty much whatever they want. If anything, men a…
/r/MensRights18/11/13 06:17 AM
1

that's now free. Just going to point out that only a single update [so far] is "free" once you've already purchased a license. "Free" would mean that you don't need to pay for it to get it.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 06:08 AM
2

Being caught having anal sex, performing felatio or cunnilingus is also prosecutable. Wait - really!? That's absurd. What about a married same-sex couple with one person in the military (which is legal now)? Is it technically illegal for them to be intimate? That's one of the stupidest things I've never heard.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:37 AM
2

Many of the trainers at my gym are doing it as well. Apparently it's the only time of year their uniform allows them to have facial hair. It's pretty cool!
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:27 AM
21

1) Lack of dick cheese Oh c'mon. Just play with yourself in the shower every day for like 3 seconds. 2) Foreskin gets in the way when masturbating You're doing something wrong. 4) If you masturbate enough, you will get ED. That's circumcision-related? You'll get desensitized regardless of the presence of your foreskin if you jack off too much. It's called "death grip syndrome". 5) Pulling foreskin back feels, icky. Does it? Or did you misspell "awesome?"
/r/MensRights12/11/13 05:26 AM
1

Wow. That was not what I expected this article to be.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:55 PM
7

male spaces Well there should never be such a thing as a "male space." Stop trying to have your own space you misogynist pig, you.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:46 PM
-1

Political over-correctness is certainly a problem, but I don't see this as an example of that. We can certainly have a conversation about the value of fatherhood (or even about the value of motherhood), but that conversation loses meaning when it precludes that fatherhood or motherhood is absolutely necessary without without exception. The point is that fatherhood is certainly important and valuable, but two female parents can also be caring and effective without a male presence - as can two mal…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:08 AM
0

My first inclination would be that GMP didn't want to sound like it was against same-sex (or, specifically, lesbian) couples raising children.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 11:31 PM
2

I can understand how you feel. Sometimes reading shit online just drives you crazy and you, as the meme goes, don't want to live on this planet anymore. It happens in anything you're passionate about: gender, politics, economics, technology - anything, but that's because I think we, as humans, have a tendency to almost seek out contrary opinions to the point of frustration (and beyond). Sometimes you just need to close your browser, pour yourself a glass of whiskey, and hang out with friends. Di…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:43 AM
3

it can be heart breaking to lose your unborn child, some women never recover fully from it. It is not something I can support ever pressuring anyone into But the emotional and quality of life impact on men doesn't matter in this case? The fact that he may have to throw away years of hard work and education because he needs an income immediately, and the fact that he's forced to give away a significant portion of his income for nearly two decades under threat of imprisonment don't matter compared…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:40 AM
1

I don't actually know much about this, but are people who have to register as sex offenders allowed to parent their own children? I'd imagine they would as long as said sex offense didn't involve children.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:23 AM
7

Also, I believe that honesty about contraception is huge. Should a guy claim to be wearing a condom, or to have had a vasectomy, or whatever, and he doesn't, that's rape in my eyes and you better believe that he should be liable for child support. Same goes for a woman lying about being on the pill, or about any other form of female birth control, right? If she lies, she should be charged with rape, register as a sex offender, and be solely responsible for her child, right? I'm almost certain th…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:37 PM
6

No contraceptive is 100% effective, and modern chemical birth control is currently only an option for women (and, therefore, up to the woman's morality to accurately disclose - stories of "she said she was on the pill, but she wasn't" abound). "Just wrap it" is far from a complete solution.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:10 PM
1

Doing taxes and finances is pretty easy, for people with basic literacy and math skills. Eh I'd say if that was the case, there wouldn't be such a large market for tax preparation assistance. Verbal skills are fairly fungible in that they can develop pretty much anywhere as long as there's a focus on writing and presentation. History isn't the only field where people write papers.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:55 AM
2

I guess I misunderstood you - mostly because the scenario you outlined never happens. What is exceedingly common, though, is when a person actually is gay but behaves as a straight or bisexual person would (and either doesn't explicitly claim any sexual orientation, or claims to be straight, or only comes out to certain people).
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:49 AM
4

I believe "sex" refers to the genetic state of being "male" or "female" and "gender" refers to the psychological state of being "man" or "woman." Although I usually don't pretend to understand transgender issues because most of what I've learned about transgender people is that I don't understand what it'd be like to be transgender.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:40 AM
2

Well that's what the term "transition" refers to. It isn't about becoming the other gender on a biological and genetic level - it's about making your physical body match your mental gender.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:35 AM
9

No he isn't. He's still gay - he's just not [yet] acting on his natural urges, likely because of societal pressure. Closeted gay people are still gay, even if they aren't out.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:33 AM
1

when people working for the Taliban reveal sensitive information to the US Government, they're "informants". Well they're also traitors - against the Taliban. Just like an American traitor would be called an "informant" by an American enemy. Terms like "traitor" and "informant" depend entirely on who's on your side and who's your enemy.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:31 AM
1

I did well in school (and my high school was 80-90% "sit down and listen to a lecture"), but I would have really loved a shop class. I loved doing FIRST Robotics, which I guess could kinda be considered a 21st-century equivalent, but that wasn't a class. It would've been cool to have some more physical, hands-on classes and stuff. Although there was that one semester of physics where we got to build trebuchets... that was fucking awesome. So yeah - bring back shop. For everyone. Also bring back …
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:24 AM
1

The state has almost no interest in legislating the private sexual conduct of its citizens. Uhhhh - kinda. Sodomy laws were on the books, and were enforced, for a long time in many countries. In fact, they're still on the books in a surprising number of states and municipalities, and, even though they shouldn't be, they're also shockingly often still "enforced" because of the complex and somewhat narrow precedent established by the supreme court. If governments [or their citizens] weren't intere…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 07:28 AM
2

Does oral count? That's up to you, really. To you, does it count if a girl has had oral sex?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:09 AM
3

I'm still somewhat confused. So are you a virgin? And are you expecting to spend the rest of your life with the first woman you have sex with? Or do you think your standards might relax if the first woman you fuck doesn't end up being your soulmate?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:05 AM
3

I'm very well aware that I'm free to stick things in my ass and to have sex with my boyfriend ha ha - and I'm glad you're down with me having that freedom. Most of my experience with feminism has involved thinly-veiled neutrality or even disdain for gay men (especially more masculine gay men) under the guise of "support." The feminist movement has the LGBT community in its back pocket and for some reason a lot of us just blindly go along with it, even though feminists fought pretty hard against …
/r/MensRights28/07/13 11:59 PM
6

I don't think they do. I'm just remarking that my drawer of dildos kinda coincides with the fact that I like cock.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 11:54 PM
1

Most people on Reddit tend to be supportive of equal rights, and I generally assume people I encounter aren't homophobic and do support equality - which has worked out pretty well so far. I'm just wary of the possibility of a knee-jerk reaction from anti-feminists along the lines of "feminists claim to support gay rights, so we have to oppose them because we oppose feminism!" Trans people have it pretty rough, from pretty much everyone. It's really quite terrible.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:33 PM
9

I have a fairly sizeable drawer of toys and I'm definitely anti-feminist. but I'm also gay
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:24 PM
1

Of course, and even though they shouldn't be, plenty of issues (gay rights, women's rights, etc) are automatically conflated as "liberal issues," and some people believe that you have to support one in order to support the other. I'm not for forcing religious groups to marry those they don't want to marry Honestly, I think you'd be very hard-pressed to find any gay person or gay rights supporter who wants to "force" anything on anyone (save for forcing assholes to deal with someone else having r…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:51 PM
7

I don't disagree, and I definitely don't agree with the "liberal=x,y,z and ¬liberal=x',y',z'," but I'd like to think that men's rights activists wouldn't scoff at the idea of gay [men's] right to equality. Just because feminists [pretend to] support gay rights, doesn't mean that non-feminists (or anti-feminists) automatically can't support gay rights.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 11:48 PM
-2

Support same-sex marriage. Given. More dogma. So - I was just about to upvote you until I got to that line. I know gay rights and same-sex marriage can be a point of contention among the MRA community, but, as much as feminism tries to claim gay rights as one of their "official" positions, it really isn't. I guess I'd ask - why is same-sex marriage "dogma" and not just "How is this a feminist issue?"
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter