TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sockpuppy69 Archive

View 1 posts and 56 comments by sockpuppy69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Social Issuessockpuppy69/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:51 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The purpose of the law is not supposed to assume one party is lying from the onset, but instead investigate under the premise innocent until proven guilty and find it’s the prosecution and defenses’ job to find evidence that proves the contrary or affirm this essential assumption respectively. That is how the law should work, which is fundamentally incompatible with how you’ve suggested while also claiming wrong details that only hurt mra’s case
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:36 PM
0

Literally what is the point of fucking anything if not to work to make systems function at their highest potential??????????????????????????? I'm baffled how did you think that was a legitimate reason not to do something??? Let's make this system work for everyone that's how we get it working at it's fullest potential not by twiddling our thumbs and not doing anything when there is a clear fucking solution to many of the problems it's facing today christ.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:28 AM
-4

It’s not exactly like our current standards are working flawlessly like there are clearly under qualified firefighters, police men, etc. so your whole “who’s gonna carry m through a burning building “ falls apart when you’re actively turning away people that can do the job to keep the chiefs son who swears his asthma was just a phase in the fourth grade. Not to discredit the profession I have respect for people who are willing and capable of doing such significant work, just pointing out the cur…
/r/MensRights15/10/19 08:09 PM
1

What I said is only that you are being delusional in your envy if you think that all who was born in wealthy families have it easy. Well what I said was most billionaires inherit their money and have parents who made sure that no matter how much of a fuck-up they were their accumulated wealth would last generations. This does not make them high achievers to look in awe upon. It just makes them lucky. They did not have to work, and in some cases, they took advantage of the fact that they didn't h…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:12 AM
1

Are you the child of a billionaire? Because that seems like the only explanation as to why you have such a hard on for the two thousand people who aren't just "multi millionaires" but are the richest people on Earth?? Who hold more wealth than the bottom 50% of it??? You are making too many assumptions with 0 evidence so we'll ignore that for a second to get to somewhere we agree. All I said was many billionaires made their money through no other means that being shit out the right vagina. Harsh…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 12:11 PM
1

You're missing the point so I'll be as blunt as I can: circumcision completed safely without complaint or complications would fall under your definition of MGM yet cause no actual injury (which is in the definition you so unhelpfully replied) to the man. Do you want to argue about what constitutes "injury" next??? You're being ridiculous to compare apples to oranges. Shouldn't you be happy you're excluded from the trauma that is MGM not begging to be included in the conversation, therefore dilut…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 11:57 AM
1

Lol wut??? I think you're confused my problem is circumcision is not MGM because circumcised men can live and die living happy complication and complaint free lives while victims of MGM by definition are not afforded that luxury. There is no trump card here. No aha! Moment. Im not arguing anything else just that a man who has lived a life without any complications or serious issues because of their circumcision doesn't get to say that they are MGM victims which you would support. Obviously there…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:10 AM
-16

You're almost doing a think! You claim to know the inner workings of women despite that literally being impossible and now you cite rather incorrectly that "women don't apply to STEM fields." Let's talk about why women aren't applying in STEM fields. I say it is because of the social stigma (held up by both men and other women) that tells many women interested in these fields to not worry their pretty little heads about a career whatsoever, let alone in STEM, and because of the lasting impact of…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:00 AM
1

Not being able to hear violas while still listening to enjoyable music is like exactly what trivial is. Male genital mutilation is serious and debilitating and negativity impacts you for life. That has nothing in common with Circumcision. You wanting your foreskin pales in comparison to a MGM survivor 'wanting' functioning genitals. You saying otherwise and putting yourself on the same level or anywhere close for that matter is dishonest and sickening.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:46 AM
1

Why does it matter that the foreskin is sensitive if circumcised men live completely satisfactory lives, in the context of sex or otherwise? Nobody is arguing the science but you just can't call something so trivial mutilation
/r/MensRights30/08/19 01:37 AM
-2

Right off the bat I don't know if any individuals will be sufficiently 'non self made' enough for you because it's a pretty subjective measurement but the Waltons and Koch family dynasties should fail any sniff tests. As an aside, for me none of the billionaires ik are sufficiently self made and weren't afforded above average circumstances and conditions if that makes sense, but that's my opinion I may be more skeptical about their means to their wealth than most
/r/MensRights30/08/19 12:42 AM
-13

Most of these billionaires just inherited their money and would have to be complete idiots to lose any of it so no most of them are not in fact high achievers
/r/MensRights30/08/19 12:15 AM
-14

How can you make sweeping claims about women's motivations without evidence proving your observations on womens alleged motivations???
/r/MensRights30/08/19 12:04 AM
2

The thing is she woul never even accuse the white guy in the first place! Truly fucked up
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:25 PM
2

The guys who committed the crime, the girl who lied, the courts who didn't hold legitimate proceedings, the racist media who backed them up, and the crowd that cheered when they were found not guilty are all in fact guilty
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:15 PM
3

Yea I agree. I remember doing a huge paper on some topic I honestly don't remember but long story short we had to make a powerpoint at the end which was restricted to three slides, boiling down our pages and pages of research with a visual aid. I was surprised when it came time to make the visual aid and I was able to find some genuine data on sites like statista or journal databases that sort of reminded me of these bite-sized compilations of facts only I didn't have to worry about their credib…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:45 AM
16

I think it's okay to be heavily skeptical of any information until the burden of proof is met to your satisfaction. I tend to find infographics like this, not directly tied to any credible institutions, ineffective even if they do have the little sources in fine print in the corner, as I'm much more comfortable and convinced with primary sources
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:10 PM
-4

I don't think that's true in the US; it is harder to get a job in many of these professions because there is so much competition fighting for a handful of available spots. Plus if that were true and care professionals were easier to find then it would make sense that they are getting paid less because there will always be someone available to undercut your pay and now you don't have a job and the person that does is making pennies.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:18 PM
0

Except it is not all colleges look at it, or any I know of for that matter and I've had experience We just had a seminar where we basically were told if you're both drunk neither of you consented which is the objectively correct way to look at it and the widely accepted way. Where to go from there is where it gets messy but this is not just one school with a good policy many colleges use this logic in instances like this so this poster is alone in its logic and any college counselor would agree
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:36 PM
2

I think the problem is not what she is doing I agree, and that makes me wary of trying to Trojan horse the legitimate conversation with a much less justifiable one when you could pose the core of the issue and have a much more productive conversation no? It seems like the OPs are trying to get people angry at the wrong issue which is distracting people from the real problem you've addressed. Or at addressing it poorly
/r/MensRights27/08/19 06:48 PM
-1

Why is that bad? As someone said its a free country that should apply to silly restrictions on what tops adults are wearing I think society would need a huge overhaul but Im not butthurt over the women "screaming at everyone" I just live my life and they live theirs
/r/MensRights27/08/19 06:37 PM
1

You're not looking at the big picture. The baby had to be alive first in order to not go under any painful procedures. In order to get there the mother probably gave birth in the hospital, where if anything goes wrong the polar opposite is in play and doctors have free will to sacrifice the life of the baby to protect the mother as the doctor has had for the past 9 months. So once the baby is alive and separated now your rights come into play, but they seem to be reliant on some muddy idea that …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:13 AM
0

Why do you want to take away their normal life which they've been fine with this whole time for the promise of a better life for their kid maybe which is just hot air? Their son could end up happy with living and dying with no problems with their foreskin just the same as the parent did without his. So how can you prove that one lived a better, more complete life? It's all based on perspective. If someone thinks their situation is normal they aren't mutilated sorry because in the US so many men …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:01 AM
1

This sounds like whining. You're spitting basic logic at me and trying to justify this huge complex issue. If you remove something it is removed. Okay? That is not intrinsically such a bad thing. Your life is "impacted" by the removal of a tumor you're just taking advantage of the language to make a bad argument. You might want to think that you're so worse off after being circumcised, but you're actually fine. I'm sure between circumcised men maybe a guy wakes up one day disilusioned and looks …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:49 AM
1

In maternity care doctors are trained to protect the mother first. Always. Right now your opinion would orphan a lot of kids because I don't think you like that Maxim either. But it's what saves lives. This field is tricky and there is a lot that a little can impact which can send waves across this country. Making circumcision safer is a much more effective step than trying to make it illegal. Yes babies have rights but the key ones you think are being violated are just that: ones you think are …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 08:36 AM
-2

I'm not arguing about female genital mutilation my friend, I'm arguing that you don't just get to decide circumcision is now genital mutilation without legitimate justification and force society to bend to your will, stifiling freedom in the process. You would have to be a very dumb pro-FGM person to try and use the argument that "if male circumcision is harmless then female circumcision is" because interestingly enough that claim is just as unjustified as yours that male is harmful if that make…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:59 PM
-4

I think you're forgetting about the many more men who have 0 complaints and live a healthy happy life without complaints or complications arising from their circumcision. After all, being uncut still has problems so nobody is perfect but you are either overinflating the phenomena anecdotally because like I said horror stories of botched circumcisions aren't evidence we should scrap the whole concept (ill explain in a second) or you are misguided and don't realize that just calling something a ca…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:00 PM
-2

You're making the mistake that safe circumcision without complication or complaint is comparable to male genital mutilation, which is not safe and im pretty sure more people complain about that regardless of if it is done properly or not. I am trying to tell you you're infringing on peoples freedoms. Its fucking stupid I don't want you to prove that im arguing for FGM when I still think MGM is unacceptable??? Why would you make an argument for me I think im capable of doing that myself, if I wan…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:24 PM
0

You're making yourself look ridiculous by attacking freedom. You're actually saying you just want to keep taking away peoples constitutional freedoms until there is nothing left that resembles America. I simply am not in that same camp, I believe in freedom, and I believe in stopping people from taking away the freedoms I have by any means necessary. If you can't see what a slippery slope that is you're either an idiot or lying to yourself. Good luck with trying to sell your daughter into slaver…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:11 PM
0

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/black-or-white There are more possibilities on the political spectrum, which has absolutely nothing to do with my argument you can be a nazi and still not agree with your stupidity, but there are more possibilities than either being a feminist or bandwagoning on the victim train believing you were wrong for being safely circumcised without complication I can assure you that. Disagreeing with such would just make you a plain idiot no questions there. I'm proud you…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:35 PM
-1

Not to be pessimistic but why would me holding that opinion even matter in this context? I can't vote for doctors to do things one way or not, there are professionals who set standards that doctors in the US and across the world must follow or lose their license to practice medicine. The field of urology is not new so it doesn't make sense why real people, real doctors even like not even the government or something but true blue experts, would be so callous and morally absent. I'm not convinced …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:24 PM
-2

First of all, if they shouldn't, then why do they? Who is spearheading our moral failing as a society? How has it gone on for centuries without objection substantial enough for a change to come? Something doesn't add up... The fact is there is a fundamental disagreement here, you think circumcision shouldn't be performed without a medical reason and when I point out that is taking away people's freedom you begin to retreat and say I don't care about male genital mutilation. I do. I care about ma…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:03 PM
1

Why is it that not all men complain after their circumcision. That would be unexplainable under your theory. They should be fucked for missing their "significant amount of nerve-dense erogenous tissue." But why the fuck are most men living and dying without ANY complaints WHATSOEVER associated with their circumcision. This shit does not add up bro. If it's so bad that even when done correctly there are still issues, then how is it that you can be circumcised and live without any problems? Did a …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:53 PM
-3

If you look at this source without bias you can bring to understand my point. Obviously when a medical procedure goes wrong there are severe consequences but that's a different matter entirely. You can hold the idea that it is an unnecessary risk for a parent to put their child under the kid could die after all you're right. Where you go so DANGEROUSLY wrong is thinking next it is logical to remove the freedoms we have in place because some people use them. You can't do that, we live in a free c…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:37 PM
1

Look at the bigger picture. You can draw a clear like from genital mutilation to problems associated with it. There is however, no line that connects a safe circumcision to a lesser quality of life. Nowhere. That is why there always has to be a "complication." If there are however, no complications and the procedure is successful (which these are clearly not...) Then I am at a loss of evidence that suggests no actually even when they're successful there circumcised men are subjected to a life of…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:24 PM
-12

I don't think the answer is to take away our freedom. Why do you? Circumcision is not damaging the penis the science tells us that so why jump to such a reactionary conclusion with 0 evidence that safely circumcised life is anything close to life as a genitally mutilated man or woman. Because there is indeed no evidence. You're fine if you've been circumcised properly everything else would fall under the category of mutilation. Which is not good and we can make illegal without taking away our Bi…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:08 PM
-1

So we should remove people's rights because a medical procedure is not perfect? No. The answer is no. We are not going to start infringing on people's rights without any sort of evidence whatsoever. From all that biology talk I'm going to take what the reality is, that the penis is the male clitoris, and explain that in the US you're far safer going to Mass Gen and getting circumcised while also having the luxury of a bill or rights compared to maybe Canada or some third world country. You've po…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:56 AM
-2

It's a loss because you're taking away everyone's rights. What even is a niche religion like where is the cutoff? Circumcision has been a tenet in religions with billions of people forever now and the babies are safer now than ever before, which is a real win, so why on Earth would we go backwards? I think this circumcision is bad thing goes against what science has said and I'm not the type to advocate for anyone's freedom to be taken away so I really don't know who that would be a win for besi…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:39 AM
-2

That does not indeed meet the bar that warrants infringing on citizens rights. It is in no way dangerous living without it and I'd actually way easier for one, and two sex is still great without foreskin so nobody is missing out on shit. It may seem like an obvious conclusion that sec without foreskin is impaired somehow because it's missing "the most sensitive part of the penis" but it is in fact, not. Why? Because you can't just make claims like that and would need evidence to support that con…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:25 AM
0

Unclear why you brought what you have up so I won't misrepresent your argument but I'll just say the US has Bill of Rights, which you seem to be forgetting no other country has. So we will always do things differently than Canada because we have freedoms they don't and I'm glad about that But even still, states have the ability to make their own laws, and local government does too so how do you explain the absence of legislation in those areas? How is it that people are so apathetic go their cor…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:11 AM
1

If we lived in a world where all that was indeed true as it is for foreskin then someone who was against that would sound like an idiot no? Why would you make that ridiculous argument it's literally apples to oranges which means you know you can't win an argument if we stayed talking about foreskin so you have to resort to...accusing me of saying something i didn't??????? When have I used any of that logic??? I haven't and you're clearly misrepresenting my view to make it easier to attack. GTFO …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:50 AM
-1

Genital Mutilation is not anything that is unnecessary, these people are seriously damaged and are fucked for the rest of their life. Circumcision is nothing close to that type of damage. I also really have a hard time buying the 'unnecessary' argument since most of the field of plastic surgery is unnecessary depending on your perspective...but ask the person doing it and they will have the opinion that it is indeed necessary just as you can have your...opinion...that it is otherwise. Do you thi…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:34 AM
-2

Let me preface by saying I already said idrc about any of the issues one way or another you can feel how you feel about circumcision and genital mutilation, which we agree on, but there are some seriously bad and uneducated takes and those are from the few people that didn't just downvote or just call me ignorant so yea im game. There are some swirlings of consent maybe but I have no idea what the prevailing reason as to why circumcision is so problematic so I don't want to run with that when th…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:23 AM
-14

Prosecuting the people trained to do this procedure that is very simple for them but can lead to some severe genital mutilation if done incorrectly by non-professionals is not the way to go and we should be looking out for and protecting the future generation of boys not making it more dangerous for them to be born
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:01 AM
-3

I'm being downvoted but you're the first person to make an actual point. I still don't think that circumcision should be banned because it is unpreventable. Multiple huge religions directly call for circumcision and as long as people hold them they will have the freedom to express that. If that isn't enough and circumcision is banned then what is going to stop a mom from doing it herself? Any punishments after the fact and they are a martyr and the government is willfully religiously prosecuting…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:46 AM
0

I surely do not get bliss from this but if you think it is a waste of time to explain yourself to someone who will listen but holds a different opinion and would rather just be told youre right then I don't think I'm the ignorant one and the downvotes confirm that everyone wants to be told theyre right and nobody wants to be questioned. I am still willing to hear your take because I actually think discussions like this are productive and I don't want to be wrong if I can help it. I don't think w…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:29 AM
1

From what gets upvoted and downvoted you can paint a pretty HD picture of the values here. Circumcision is a deal-breaker apparently there is 0 room for discussion around that for starters which is pretty odd because such a unique stance should be able to be easily defended because after all you had to reject the status quo to reach said opinion but nope just downvotes. False Accusations are somehow a trump card but pointing them out doesn't make a kid about to have sex any less afraid that he m…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:18 AM
-2

How are you so sure life would be any better with foreskin? Because that's impossible and therefore that doesn't apply here right? Plus if there was evidence circumcision was bad we would have gotten rid of the practice long ago but there isn't.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:04 AM
-19

People would just do it illegally, and nothing would change. how is a law like that going to be enforced? what would be the punishment?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:53 AM
-4

Just because this idea is popular doesn't mean it is right. I refuse to jump on the bandwagon. If that is extreme ignorance...
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:42 AM
1

i KNEW i was right to trust you'd come through with a good response so thank you once more. So yes we pretty much agree what you've outlined are faults with feminism and serious ones at that. And you're right to some extent about how it would indeed be nice for her to say shell commit to being nice and stand up for men but not only did I gather than from her "my boys" segment but anything more overt would be not her style and preaching to the choir but that's a problem specific to the ContraPoin…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:32 AM
-11

Not convinced about 'damage' let alone 'serious damage' on par with destruction, butchering, and disfiguring nature of genital mutilation tho. There is a better case for raising awareness of acts of genital mutilation and violence against men in their actual forms because calling circumcision senseless is a slippery slope to making it similar to other senseless surgeries (plastics) which is not beneficial.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:09 AM
-24

I don't think so because it is harmless and like everyone or at least a vast majority of men live and die without any difference in their lives because of circumcision
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:56 AM
0

away from real men's issues I think the name of the game is compromise, especially in politics. Someone has to be wrong and blaming feminism or blaming an incorrect idea of toxic masculinity (unsurprisingly she has a video which touches on this..her most popular and definitely best vid but I digress) and not being willing to do whatever it takes even if it means listening to the other side for the advancement of a handy dandy thing called men's rights. But like I'd be fine if someone got the sou…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:35 AM
0

This is the worst thing I could have read and the worst response you could have had. Would you like it if I changed my mind about the lizard thing and edited it out so we could actually talk ideas because that is fine with me it's more important I really really don't care about the feminists and what theyre up to at times when it doesn't present an issue with my current goals which right now are the same as yours. I'm begging you that lizard people is obvious satire !!! I really am sorry I start…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:25 AM
-3

I don't believe that idea is any more helpful or adds anything to the conversation than a conspiracy theory that lizards are running the world... Everyone needs rights. Women need women's rights and Men need men's rights because women need women's rights and men need men's rights. Once we're on that same page (because there are def some you and I both know that will disagree with such a sentiment but it is admittedly a pretty low bar which is where the next step comes in), we can move on to addr…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter