TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

soldoutactivist Archive

View 2 posts and 438 comments by soldoutactivist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Even fucking looks around to make sure no one's watching. This isn't a case of someone who doesn't know better. She knew better and did it anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/16 10:14 PM
2

Well, when the glass house you're throwing stones at is actually a camera...
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/16 06:30 PM
8

Kids, it's thicc in the booty, not in the face.
/r/PussyPass18/09/16 07:02 AM
9

That's when you aggressively manspread. If you don't fight for something, you never had it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 03:52 AM
24

*MANSPREADING INTENSIFIES*
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 01:01 AM
84

Equality: First Come, First Serve
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/16 07:32 PM
58

They wouldn't be laughing had you defended yourself with force. Why you let her push you around? Can't control your woman, eh? Motherfucker, you hit her? I don't care if she stabbed you. Off to jail with you, shithead!
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/16 02:44 AM
3

I'll not be judged by ye, Benis-named Pig!
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 04:00 PM
30

If only Gawker had lasted another month, we could have put them to the test.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 06:56 AM
11

When one of your ideological tenants is #ListenAndBelieve, it's not even a numbers game at that point.
/r/PussyPass17/08/16 12:36 AM
4

I was hoping for /r/pornrevenge.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 12:10 AM
50

Hey, if false rape victim Mattress can be this year's "Woman of "Courage"", then why not?
/r/PussyPass10/07/16 04:38 PM
73

Certainly not after he is expelled for "undue aggression".
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/16 01:51 AM
7

Pussy pass so fast they had to give her another one because the first caught on fire due to air friction.
/r/PussyPass20/05/16 03:20 PM
3

I know there's a joke train going, but: By committing more than one crime at a time. And by doing that multiple times before you're arrested.
/r/PussyPass17/05/16 07:22 PM
9

It probably went: Man jaywalked. (Ignored.) Man spit on sidewalk. (Ignored.) Man littered. (Ignored.) Man double parked. (Ignored.) Man stole gum. (Man can't be found.) Man stole gum again. (Man can't be found.) Man stole gas. (Gas attendant says otherwise.) Man punched someone. (People involved can't be found.) Man stole a car. (Car belonged to man.) Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Woman accuses man of attempted murder. A severe enough crime to warrant repercussions.
/r/PussyPass03/05/16 02:53 AM
57

And get fired for touching the girl? Yeah, right.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/16 11:35 PM
13

Translated: These cases were won because the college sexual assault trials were based on feminist theory that assume #listenAndBelieve, or, a woman wouldn't lie about rape. And not anything that would qualify as evidence in a court of law. As such those college trials were never valid.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/16 10:13 PM
9

No. You're wrong. Your entire statement is wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/16 08:05 PM
11

Yeah, it's more like /r/pussypasspending
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/16 10:54 AM
8

You lost this one bro. You lost this one bro. You lost this one bro. You lost this one bro. You lost this one bro. You lost this one bro.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/16 01:37 PM
10

Fuck, I can feel it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrYzjLeQ2nk
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/16 10:07 PM
-7

Hell doesn't exist. Put her in a cell with no heat until she as cold her dead kids.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/16 02:06 PM
-2

You fucking racist.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/16 08:41 AM
6

I didn't say 'sexist', I Just said the man was "discouraging women from entering politics" by saying "those things". Not sexist at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/16 11:39 PM
1

Well, in 3 years or so anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/16 07:29 AM
28

Don't forget the the EUs "right" to be forgotten law.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/15 08:02 PM
3

I have PTSD now.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/15 03:51 AM
11

Her original point of view was that thunderfoot and company couldn't do anything to harm her even if she posted her own name. At the end of the video, her husband verbatim quotes her and said she was wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/15 05:48 PM
24

Her own husband called her a liar at the end.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/15 11:39 AM
4

More importantly, she'd write that down on her sign. "I said no. He didn't stop." That'd be pretty damning if she wrote that. But she didn't. Because I'm betting she didn't say no. And it's only rape because she regrets the outcome of her choices.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:10 AM
–

Not when the definition of rape for these kind of women is: "It's rape if I didn't want to do it despite not saying I didn't want to do it. Even if I decide I didn't want to do it days, maybe weeks, later depending on my mood the next time I see or think of that person."
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:08 AM
–

You have no right to masturbate in public, even in your own car.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:29 PM
–

The article doesn't say but I doubt the officers were in the process of arresting him when he decided to prove his "innocence." More like: Cop: We got a report you were masturbating. Man: What? Oh... No. I have a rash. Cop: Sure you do. Man: No, seriously. I'll show it you. Cop: ... Okay, but if you don't... Later. Cop: Okay... wow. You should get something for that... Oh. That's why you were at the pharmacy. Have a good day, sir. Done. No drama necessary.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:20 PM
–

The suspect responded that he had gotten "the urge to scratch his testicles" because of a rash he had. He then asked if he could show someone his rash just to prove he was telling the truth. Apparently police agreed, because the suspect "presented his testicles" to an officer, who "verified that [he] did have a rash." The man asked if he could prove he had a rash. It was his idea. There was no violence or threat. Read the fucking article before you open your mouth.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:46 AM
-5

Yay for you.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:14 AM
–

The man choose to show the rash to the cops. He could have said no. If the cops arrested him, then at court, the man would present medical evidence to the existence of his rash.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:14 AM
3

"Sometimes Patriarchy hurts men too."
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:41 AM
–

According to the article, he was vigorously scratching which to a person from a distance could seen as probable masturbation. If I saw a person in front of a store seemingly masturbating, I'd do the same. This is not an MR issue.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:59 AM
–

This isn't an MR issue in the slightest. I find it amusing, though, that people from /r/AskWomen followed the OP into this thread.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:55 AM
2

Because that'd be logical.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:08 AM
5

But then the cause would be a barely evil and very male therapist one of the lesbians was seeing.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:59 AM
–

15k Kroner is ~$2600ish USD. I don't know if that's a lot in Denmark, but in most places in America, that's a very nice monthly budget.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:54 AM
1

Rights bot, rights bot. What you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:58 AM
2

I don't know where to begin with this. There's so many bait-worthy lines in your reply. Either you're being so sarcastic it comes off straight. Or you're a troll. Maybe both, maybe neither. Either way, I'm out.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:54 AM
1

OP is saying a person self-representing will lose 99% of the time. And this woman'll appeal the loss with an actual lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:34 AM
1

Speaking of mods, there's a bunch of new ones and the old ones are gone.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:27 AM
–

Title Change: How Pinterest Reinforces What A Million Years of Evolution Has Built
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:23 AM
2

Also: how is this a Men's Rights issue?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:18 AM
7

So plan to raid the real library for examples of women in science to add to the Wikipedia articles? These women exist, but not in the quantities they seem to expect.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:26 PM
–

Nope. Not an MR issue. He could have hired a man to slap him. Even if the woman was a man-hating feminist who got off on slapping him. The article and its intent are not gender related at all. Furthermore, when I had an assistant her job was essentially the same and it was indeed very effective.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:44 AM
–

Bam. Right in the logic.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:01 AM
2

If be wiling to bet the thought about lesbians never occurred to her. I truly hope she looks at everyone suspiciously from now on.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:06 PM
–

Lets form Atheism++.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:07 PM
4

Gender Fascist certainly has a punch to it, but I think you're splitting a fine hair. Personally, I'd use a line like: "You're right. You're not a feminazi; you're a gender fascist." And see how long it took the recipient to figure out I'm still calling them a feminazi. Or: "Stop being a gender fascist, go back to just being a feminazi."
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:56 PM
1

In the comments: As someone who has, many years ago, captive bred and observed wild mantises of more than a dozen species, I saw far more than 30 matings, hundreds in fact. I was usually able to save the male by first feeding the female until she was not hungry anymore. And I would leave the pair on a houseplant in a room with lots of space. By morning, the male was usually somewhere on the opposite side of the room. But every so often, I would get a female that would eat the male no matter what…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:45 PM
1

EvilShallWin already replied with the most common version. But nowadays, doctors can do a test for genetic diseases and parents have the option to terminate for various reasons: down's syndrome, deafness, and so on. The UK tried (I don't know if they were successful) to make it illegal to do this specifically with purposefully terminating non-deaf fetuses.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:31 PM
3

Apparently something the Patriarchy made up.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:31 AM
1

Praying mantis have voracious appetites, and hungry females have been witnessed eating the males before copulation ever began. Sexual canabalism isn't fully understood, but one theory says its just a very instinctual reaction to the sudden need for calories to generate an egg sack that'll house the offspring during their gestation. She still maintains her regular hunting habits after that. Finally, fit males will more often escape than be eaten.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:24 AM
6

Damn you OPRAAAAAAAH!
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:07 AM
2

Praying Mantises (and Black Widows) eat the males for food during the pregnancy.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:57 AM
–

You get Rights. You get rights. Everyone gets rights!
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:44 AM
1

There are as many holes in my plot description as there are in feminism. And mine only took a few minutes to make up.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:50 AM
–

Then she time travels back twenty years and pokes a hole in one of her old boyfriend's condoms so she gets pregnant and never starts her own company, avoiding the massive debt. She gets married and becomes a housewife with 3 kids and in 10 years still complains about how bad women have it to a classmate she meets at a High School reunion. Incepted. Wait, that's only one level. Then the 50-year old housewife goes back in time and plants evidence her future husband was cheating so the younger her …
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:11 AM
–

Me? No. But these kind of women obviously believe such a thing.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:10 AM
–

This is like deaf people purposefully making their children deaf at birth. Which I think is illegal now, but my aunt who is a professional sign language interpreter said this was disturbingly common even just a few decades ago.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:43 AM
–

Or she succeeds, starts her own company, makes a shit ton of money, walks around with five friendzoned trophy men just to carry her credit cards, and still complains how bad women have it.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:37 AM
–

Unless that girl gets into the same college with a scholarship for "being a woman." And they meet again in another physics class. Man, that's MTV shitcom material.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:25 AM
–

So of course after a divorce, the man’s standard of living increase 42% and the woman’s standard decreases 73% – he no longer has to support two people, and she is no longer supported, she has to pay her own way, and start from scratch to do so. Excuse me. I must laugh.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:12 AM
4

When you do these, find out where the female-only taxi service houses their cars and set up next door.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:49 AM
7

I grew up learning about MLK and think he left a word out of the opening line of his famous speech: Pipe.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:45 AM
1

There isn't unless assume you the trolls were SRS-based and not just average trolls.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:19 AM
1

There's a really nice 90's cartoon moral here: I'm not poor; I'm just the bottom 0.0001% of the richest people in America.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:16 AM
–

The same reason lawyers defend criminals.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:08 AM
1

This stretches the term "article" like a porn star's anus.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:01 AM
0

Let's not forget the history of men's suffering is commonly known as World History. On which there are written several thousand percent more books than those on Feminism. Also more teachers teach it. Let's not forget the majority of American women did not want Women's Suffrage for literally decades. Finally, if Feminism isn't reactionary, then why does it exist?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:51 AM
-1

I doubt the Panda whatever got Anderson Cooper to do his expose on the matter, which aired days before the policy change. But I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:13 AM
–

After researching it, it looks like the original Panda Project or Operation Panda, or whatever its called, did target /jailbait. But I can't find anything about doxxing being the result. Or that doxxing happened. But I didn't look very hard.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:02 AM
1

The original Nationalist Socialist party in Germany had nothing to do with the later Nazified version, but you don't see anyone running around saying, "No, no. Our Nazi party isn't like that Nazi party." People just don't call themselves Nazis unless they mean the bad kind. I view feminism in the same light. When most of the term has been corrupted by cancer, "good" feminists should cut their losses and use a new term.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:55 AM
2

But he feels "sooo bad about doing that."
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:41 AM
2

Because ingenuity was invented 15 years ago.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:39 AM
–

I generally agree with that attitude regarding words. But these people--SRS or otherwise--moved from words to actions. And these kind of actions can ruin lives. Maybe the /r/MensRights moderators are made of tougher stuff than violentacrez. Maybe they don't have affiliations with questionable subreddits that'll be used as leverage against them. But that's not the point. If we ignore feminism--a lot of which is hypocritical talk by over-reacting jerks--like you suggest we ignore SRS, we'd be in a…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:37 AM
–

Sue Reddit first for their inaction to curtail SRS's criminal activity and hate-mongering. If they aren't complicit, they'll cooperate by providing information to help discover the identities of those specifically responsible for the crimes. Then sue those people. Since the trials and the participants will be public knowledge, that would be legal doxxing. EDIT: If the culprits were ultimately not part of SRS, so be it. Successful litigation of anyone doing this is beneficial to everyone on the i…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:16 AM
–

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:09 AM
-4

I'm very concerned about your inability to properly apply spacing around punctuation.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:27 PM
8

The real definition of self-defense is that you can use force to prevent your own death, but you are supposed to stop the moment you are out of immediate danger. For example, if you kick your assailant in the stomach and make it into your car. Self defense is done. You've gone too far if you run him over--unless he had a gun pointed at you and that can be proven. While a sympathetic jury might let you off, technically that's manslaughter. These woman go to jail because they go beyond self defens…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:07 PM
1

You suffer mental anguish when you are late to work due to a power outage that disabled your alarm. That's not violence. You suffer mental anguish when your cell phone dies and you miss an important call from your boss. That's not violence. When your ex-wife trips your circuit breaker and steals your cellphone charger so your alarm and phone die, this is a premeditated act with the sole intent to damage a person's life. Maybe it doesn't sit well with the standard definition of physical violence,…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:19 AM
–

Stress is psychological harm. Which happens to also be the primary result of verbal abuse and neglect. And to say a woman has no power over a man on a date is pretty ignorant.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:28 PM
–

There is no such thing as a classy woman who'd direct harm at someone. The mental anguish caused by this attack is the violence. The stress she caused him while thinking he lost the keys is the violence. If he never found the keys, the money he lost on a cab is the violence. Not to mention the difficulties of the next morning if he didn't have a spare set and had to take another cab to work. And then home. Then pay for a replacement set which wouldn't arrive immediately. So more cab rides, more …
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:09 PM
–

Violence need not include physical force. What she did was a malicious mental attack and was therefore violent.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:30 AM
2

Proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that women can not and will not replace or exceed the work of men at large--that is, catastrophic failure on a global scale--is the only cure for rampant feminism.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:02 PM
–

Solution: all men quit. Women don't fill the gap. Siemens goes under. 99% of all companies go under. Women don't fill the gap. Feminism dies. Men fill the gap. Done.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:46 AM
1

The only requirement of running for office is signing the requisite forms. The quota "blocks" men from joining when there are less than 30% of women on the overall ballot. Until this election season the quota was completely ignored. Men don't do more work to get elected and women actually interested in running for office don't do less work to get elected because of this quota. This article's entire point is that the political parties are bypassing the quota by signing up random, uninterested wom…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:27 PM
1

According to the article: Let's say 25% of that 30% of women either don't know they were selected to run for office, or were asked to run for office and don't campaign. This is so men that want to run aren't specifically excluded because the quota wasn't filled. There's no fast track because only the 5% of women who would actually spend money on campaigning are the same 5% that would anyway. Men aren't working harder in this case. The quota is still stupid.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:44 PM
–

If you follow the insinuations here, it's likely she didn't even build the rocket.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:41 PM
4

That's not ironic. That's life.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:45 AM
3

Had me rolling at: girls’ superior performance in school and university is leading to superior performance on the job
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:44 AM
1

The Bible was created by a secret fraternity. That worked out so well. PRE-REPLY-EDIT: In some ways, the Bible DID help out. Psalms was instrumental in spreading social norms like bathing and to not eat pig (back when it couldn't be cleaned properly) to those that couldn't read.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:32 AM
3

Why are you talking about beer like that? Ohhhhh. My mind replaced "rape" with "beer." AHAHAHAHAHA...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:11 AM
2

Or you could leave it at unfriending her.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:03 PM
–

It's been done. They bitched. No one was surprised.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:00 PM
1

Often I have come to a conclusion that is nicely formed in a heavy burn, but when I research it there's nothing supporting it. Closing that reddit page is so painful... DAMN YOU CRITICAL THINKING!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:53 AM
1

Critical thinking?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:50 AM
4

Latest Doritos flavor: Privilege. Tastes like ass.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:44 AM
2

Fear is the root of all social problems. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:30 AM
4

Yes.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:05 AM
2

Adblock. Ghostery. Do Not Track Plus.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:05 AM
1

Mine. And I don't even go there. Thanks feminism. /s
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:02 AM
3

Is that picture of the child or the mother?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:00 AM
11

I like the part when the non-Japanese woman gave dating advice to Japanese men.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:59 AM
11

First mistake: assuming there is a cohesive logic to anything modern Feminism does.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:45 AM
–

No, no. Female hypoagency asserts that women are "strong, independent women" and "helpless, agent-less, victims of circumstances." Simultaneously. For all every possible event.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:44 PM
18

Fortunately for you, free speech allows you to say whatever ignorant drivel you want on the internet.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:49 PM
0

I made this video for you: How To Unblock Downvotes on Reddit. If you're too lazy to add +plain to the end of the subreddit (not the end of the URL).
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:47 PM
–

I think it's pretty shitty they hide the downvote arrow with CSS.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:11 AM
3

Why would they stop using a system they've worked so hard to develop? To convince a radical feminist of anything they don't believe is a pointless effort.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:56 AM
1

The problem with your point: logic.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:55 AM
–

But their definition is wrong, so you can't hold their definition to law. Punishing this woman by feminism's illogical definition isn't going to help anyone.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:55 AM
1

I immediately downvoted this when I saw Anita's face. Fortunately, I came in comment and saw my error.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:03 AM
1

So don't go to Rhode Island now. Okay.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:15 AM
10

I enjoy the part where this is framed as something woman invented.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:52 PM
5

Men did create 99.9% of all (pollutive) technologies. But we created those to make the lives of women better. So...
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:52 PM
6

Dead eyes, stupid voice, and the sister of a more famous actress of a show that should be shot in the head and buried in a very deep grave on top of which I'd bury New Girl alive.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:18 AM
1

I'm more interested in the man standing directly under the woman looking up. He seems pretty up in arms by what he sees.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:28 PM
1

YOU'RE A DICK FOR MAKING SENSE. I see what I did there.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:05 PM
4

God, no; school was terrible. If I hadn't read every book I've read held (textbooks included) then I'd be in a terrible place. I wouldn't call it "too far beyond school" as I didn't read many textbooks above my grade. More like self-taught as a similar pace. I did have particular difficulties starting with the sixth grade, where my school career took a nosedive that never recovered. But your personal ability to thrive without college does not isolate you from the economic damage that will be don…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:03 AM
–

I skipped college and did freelance programming for a decade, eventually founding a tech startup before I began publishing novels. What I lacked in college education I've made up for with drive. Few jobs in my adult life have been low-skill, low-reward. By the way, everyone should take an Economics and Finance class in college or otherwise. They're a little dry, but the benefit to your life is almost immeasurable. Except that it can be since you learned how to do that in the Finance class. And h…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:06 AM
0

Even then I foresee the majority of the top 1% being men. All the intelligence in the world won't make up a lack of goal-oriented drive, which even the dumbest average men have in droves compared to the smartest average woman. The difference will be that there are remarkably fewer men joining military and police. Then you'll see society backtrack pretty fast.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:54 PM
3

So[ ]I have a suggestion. It's a small thing[], but it[ ]bugs the shit out of me[. ]To the point[ I ]want to kick babies. Could you[--D]o you thin[k--]I mean if[ it's ]possible? TO UNDERSTAND SRS OFTEN DELETE POSTS AND COMMENTS SO A SCREENSHOT IS OFTEN THE ONLY WAY TO PROVE THE COMMENTS EXISTED AT ALL. I mean if it's not too much o[f] an inconvenience o[r] anything... please?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:16 PM
1

Relevant.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:09 PM
2

Uhhhhh, why would I want to sleep with this ugly, unintelligent landlord?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:57 PM
–

Which goes back to my original reply: Lack of intelligence.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 05:58 AM
–

Something like: "Why would they do [stupid things] if they knew they were being video taped."
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:14 AM
–

Something like: "Why would they do [stupid things] if they knew they were being video taped."
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:14 AM
–

Lack of intelligence.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:42 AM
–

It isn't Youtube's job to ensure personal information is public knowledge; their job is ensure Youtube's continued existence.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:41 AM
4

Well, this is pretty horrific and terrifying. I would wager the ex-wife is acting in a completely rational way, she's not far removed from wildlife.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 05:38 PM
4

Maybe if they add some cats?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:48 PM
3

By cake, do you just mean easy?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:17 PM
-2

Im furious that this was done to me. If you're consistently angry about your lack of foreskin--or anything for that matter--then it is destructive. I don't need to be your journal to know that.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 02:02 AM
-1

Continue to live your life angry at something you can't change for yourself. That'll bring happiness. You can save future males from circumcision without being destructively angry about something that happened to you. Not ever volunteer at a rape or murder support center has been raped or lost someone due to murder. And many among those that have been learn to deal with this fact and live their lives.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:50 AM
-3

You're right; I'm ignorant. Because I've never had a foreskin for any appreciable span of conscious thought. So I'll never know the difference. Nor will OP. And just because studies say its better to have it for X, Y, and Z, I don't have to get mad about it or view my life as somehow deficient. Though you're right; the umbilical cord is different. Without it, you wouldn't be alive at all.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:51 AM
-12

I don't have my foreskin and I don't miss it. Because I might as well never had it. This is like missing your umbilical cord; a magical tube that fed you without you needing to eat. And here are some other things you lost before you knew you had them: night vision, the ability to breath underwater, and enhanced sense of smell. It's so unfair that evolution robbed us of those things. As with all those items, you wouldn't know you were missing out on anything if someone hadn't told you. 100% of yo…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 10:09 PM
8

I hate those people. For no particular reason.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:02 PM
2

Raped her with your disinterest!
/r/MensRights01/09/12 03:38 PM
2

I see where this is going. All sex is video recorded and stored on the internet for "real-time consent monitoring." Oh, Porn Industry, you sneaky bastard.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 03:37 PM
2

There are many more effective ways to do this than the feminist movement. It would cost less money to develop an air-borne virus that rendered 1 in 4 US citizens infertile than the money wasted on feminist policies. We've got shit loads of pigeons in major urban centers. So Pigeon flu. Millions of stray pets. Cat flu. Japan isn't suffering from feminism and they already have 50%+ of their latest generation's men uninterested in pursuing sex or work.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 03:32 PM
9

I'm surprised they could afford advertisement! Much less get it on a public bus.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:53 PM
10

Give it a decade.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:52 PM
4

I know, right? $20'll get you a much more realistic view somewhere else.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:57 PM
–

I imagined a woman bob and weaving while on top--oh, you meant fainting.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:56 PM
-1

The only difference between alpha and beta males are how alphas manifest an often-temporary insusceptibility to control by women within their unique mixture of strength, intelligence, intellect, and financial power. This quality fuels both the positive sexual attraction of viable alpha males women seek and the negative sexual "threat" of non-viable beta males which with woman pad their existence. By their susceptible nature, the threat of beta males is managed by the female through various means…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 03:47 PM
–

Except that alpha and beta males are a fundamental evolutionary tenet of our species. Denying it exists is the exact logic feminists use to manufacture patriarchal oppression while simultaneously up-selling their own brand of oppression against men. Beta males are the commodity women use to protect themselves against the drought of quality alpha males in the modern world. In other words: the friendzone. No worthwhile alpha male exists in the friendzone. And if they aren't worthwhile alphas, they…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:14 PM
–

This article has been edited, removing the sex of the "citizens." Either the information was wrong, or changed for some other reason.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:01 AM
4

This article had been edited to remove the sex of the "citizens."
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:00 AM
6

Nowhere in that article does it mention the sex of the citizens. Also, jesus, look at that cheek-to-forehead ratio.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:59 AM
4

If you read a transcript, you might think he was selling something. His keyword density was very high.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:09 PM
–

The tenets of feminism are the same as the "patriarchy" except for who's in charge and what verbs are used to describe evolutionarily-derived survival mechanisms.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:59 PM
1

Hey. Don't be a 0xFFFFFF Knight.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:32 PM
1

At the forefront of that trend is a counter-wave positing a lack of common DNA unique to such an interbreeding. It's more likely we had a common branching species we haven't found yet. That's not to say we didn't get freaky, or interbred, but apparently not in enough surviving quantities to account for their disappearance through breeding. As goes the theory, anyway.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:44 AM
–

All slavery is bad; scale is not a factor. There is no philosophical difference between owning one slave or a million. To assume otherwise buys into the kind of thinking that allowed feminism to flourish in the first place. The only reason the Native Americans didn't own a million slaves is because they didn't have the need or means to support such a number in a quasi-nomadic tribe civilization.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:34 AM
–

So? My ancestors were Native American; they were slaves and slave owners too. There's not a race on this planet that hasn't been subjugated by another at some point in human history. I'm not apologizing for the actions of less intelligent people hundreds of years ago. Or two minutes from now.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:43 AM
2

It's cool. You pointed out a loop hole; I closed it.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:47 AM
–

Look at their partner list. Looks like a list of nationwide coalition of mostly girl-only organizations to me. Any of the non-girls-only organizations are colleges or money-donating organizations such as the Ford Foundation. As to the roles of males: Boys and men are ABSOLUTELY important to the SPARK movement; we can’t change the way girls are portrayed or how others relate to them if we leave out half the population. Not to mention that sexualization of girls has been shown to be bad for boys a…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:02 AM
1

Just because X action isn't survival of the fittest, doesn't mean the underlying impulse isn't. Those mothers are bestowing what they consider survival skills. Since they are willfully ignorant, poorly trained creatures, they do extensive harm. We want to have sex because we're evolved to procreate. But evolution doesn't make us go to a bar and get shit-faced looking for a companion. Or compromise with your wife over which movie you want to see. Or even replace up your child's shit-filled diaper…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:38 AM
1

I didn't say apologize to black people. I just said apologize.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:07 AM
6

No one should apologize. Apologies are meaningless on this scale. You might as well apologize to a bear's offspring because you think most bears are dangerous.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:13 PM
–

A million years of evolution compels them to sexualize for survival. A handful of poorly worded feminist pamphlets convinces them the patriarchy is a million years old.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:06 PM
–

Idiots. Both those that apologizes and those who think the apology is worth anything. Anyone who will accept an apology has already gotten over the original grievance.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:03 PM
–

I will never apologize for my gender. I don't even apologize for my friends or girlfriend when they act the fool. Self-responsibility, people. It's a thing. You should be doing. 24/7.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:03 PM
–

Apologizing for my gender because a man raped a woman is like me apologizing for slavery because I'm white. Or apologizing for homo sapiens killing off neanderthals because I'm human.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:04 PM
–

Some feminist did shit the blue pills into his mouth. I wonder how feminist react to reading Animal Farm. Does it burn? Or maybe they think the pigs are the good guys.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:15 PM
10

Because logic is corrosive to their way of thinking.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:01 AM
1

That and Adblock. And Ghostery. And Do Not Track Plus.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:02 AM
1

I don't care. But it was creepy. I've yet to discover what I would call healthy female objectification of a man. They can't seem to just appreciate (and fap to their obvious sexual desires). They hardcore idolize the target to the nth degree. It reminds me of an off-the-deep-end anime fan (otaku).
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:54 AM
–

Laws aren't the problem. A society where we've forgotten shit is earned is the problem. Drunk pumping your cock into a random barfly doesn't count. And being on the receiving end doesn't suddenly make you capable of raising a healthy, worthwhile human being. Murder, theft, substance abuse, aggravated assault, domestic abuse, and rape. All areas where stringent laws are in place. Which few argue against their need--except the broad, yet narrow definition of rape. All areas were poor parenting lea…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:49 AM
-1

For every 1 family child support helps, there are 999 families where it doesn't. So your "poor, but alive" case results in hundreds of children in a similar situation where the outcome was terrible because of a convoluted system favoring the mother with little rhyme or reason. You are the one "victim" among a mountain of success stories of money-hungry ex-wives. The only way the child support system can be fixed is if the payments fueled a system like food stamps that could only be used for item…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:17 AM
3

I'm objectifying you so hard right now.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:31 AM
–

That's like saying the Catholic ban on condoms in Africa has to be helping someone. Or teaching Creationism is good for some students. Or teaching Abstinence as the only form of birth control is good for some. Or that killing one person to save a thousand is all right.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:29 AM
–

Fresh account. Sad story close to being divisive. Moral of said story: really all you can do is just take it Which sounds a lot like "man up." Too many odd-tasting factors. Not to mention your story is really about your father being an asshole and not child support. And let's say it's true. Your singular backstory dislodges a pebble from the mountain of evidence against child support as an institution.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:21 AM
–

For a fat kid who loves cake, your account is surprisingly new. Created for this post new. Has that shiny troll smell. So I've placed this massive salt lick right here for anyone that needs it.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:00 AM
5

The kind of people who can circumvent sterilization--which is biology, by the way, and/or the IQ test, and/or the license. Those are the kind of people significantly smarter than the chattel plaguing our planet with their toxically stupid offspring. A smart criminal is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,...x better than a fucktard of any variety.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:38 AM
–

That sounds like something that could happen in the next few centuries. Totally.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:26 AM
1

I believe they are feeling emboldened by the recent French Law that makes 'cat-calling' a serious offense.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 11:56 PM
–

Where's the girl's parents in this? They were acquaintances--well enough acquaintances to request assistances from these people--and yet never connect their daughter's "vehement" outburst with the timeliness of her accusations? Fuck you if you don't think there should be a license for having children which includes an IQ test.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 11:04 PM
4

I like how he waits until her face is good and open. Her slap was an insult; his was a deterrent.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:44 PM
–

You're thinking of Aggravated Assault. Use of a deadly weapon during an assault constitutes aggravated assault. This applies whether or not the weapon causes physical injury to anyone.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:39 PM
6

"Teaching your son to whistle will lead to sexual assault."
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:21 PM
–

They also cheat by asking for raises before they might deserve them. For amounts they wouldn't have gotten if they hadn't asked. Imagine that.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:41 PM
5

One such study found that high school math teachers tended to rate girls' math abilities lower than those of male students, even when the girls' grades and test scores were comparable to boys. Comparable. Not equal. Not better. Comparable. I can compare 1 with 10*. Or 2 with 200. Or x with y. Everything in the universe is comparable; it doesn't make them equal or even fuzzily-equal. Even if the girls are 90% as good as boys at math that's still not as good. So are the teachers supposed to lie? "…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:37 PM
1

Fortunately, I don't think Feminism has spread outside the solar system so we're good.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:42 PM
1

Some radical egalitarian.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:51 PM
2

I don't think so, but I have no idea. I think the usual route is to contest the will.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 02:06 AM
1

I had the assumption you were speaking as a feminist. It was my mistake.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:32 PM
1

If more MRAs took the egalitarian approach, they would be Egalitarians and not MRAs. Same goes for Feminists who take the egalitarian approach. That's why Egalitarism exists. Because it is different than Feminism and the MRA movement. To say that a "true" feminist is Egalitarian is to say a "true" Feminist isn't a Feminist at all, but an Egalitarian. MRA exists as a reaction to Feminism, which exists as a reaction their perceived oppression. Gender Egalitarism exists as a reaction to both moveme…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:24 PM
–

As I see it, the "bad" feminism is a cancer. As long as the cancer survives in the body of the movement, all feminism is effected by its presence. And the longer it survives the more it corrupts the whole. If you're against the "bad" feminism, then you should be working on purging the cancer from your movement. Otherwise, it will be fatal to your cause.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:23 PM
–

Thus moderated to fit a narrative. And while your examples would make for eye-catching tumblr image posts, they represent little more than preaching to the choir. The masses aren't going to be swayed with pictures of sad men like they are with women.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:57 PM
–

So don't move to India for any reason. Understood.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:47 PM
–

Remember now, Feminism isn't fueled by rational logic and as such can never be countered with rational logic. Rather, the specific logic used for each individual has to be identified and countered using the rules of that logic. An exercise in futility because this homegrown fact-spinning logic mutates at a rapid rate, so before an effective counter-measure can be delivered, the new version will be resistant to it. Hell, with each mutation, the new logic becomes toxic to old versions of itself. T…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:44 PM
–

I need Communism because the price of an MP3 is outrageous. That's the essence of the "I need Feminism because..." angle. In other words: Stupidity.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:37 PM
–

In the end, such a thing would end up like the post here. Or be moderated to fit a narrative. Not to mention, copying the actions of feminism seems like a bad idea.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:36 PM
–

No feminist ever said, "I need feminism because I enjoy thinking logically."
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:32 PM
3

Announcement: The Conference on Prostate Examination has been canceled because there were no female speakers.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:15 PM
1

I can't see a construction crew made up entirely of women. Or: Trash collectors. Mine workers. Janitors. Military. Landscapers. And so on.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:09 PM
1

No, by that times they will have identified the true culprit: Bullets.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:08 PM
–

So humanity is "too big to fail," eh? Feminism devalued birth and overvalued their own personal freedom. They took out bad "loans" on that fact and the bubble is beginning to burst. I hate to break out a video game reference, but Feminism is the Flood. And the best thing to do is activate some Halo rings. Let the crazy die off.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:00 PM
–

Child Services Worker: "It's a shame he died, his kid is only twelve. All that child support..."
/r/MensRights30/07/12 11:56 AM
4

Ignorant fuck is ignorant fuck.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:12 PM
4

Which would be hilarious. Funnier if it happened in a cubicle, though.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 08:58 PM
1

MRA exists as a reaction to the modern Feminism. Modern Feminism is a reaction to the perceived failure of Original Feminism due to the "Patriarchy." And Original Feminism was a reaction to the "Patriarchy" itself. The ERA can be viewed a gender-agnostic movement, itself reacting to the perceived failures in both the MRA and Feminism movements. And, at best, become a hindrance to both sides. With the basic anti-argument lifted all but verbatim from the argument against every other agnosticism, r…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 05:55 PM
18

I can tell he's a fantasy writer because the point was buried in a single sentence within a mountain of secondary text four paragraphs into the article.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 10:49 AM
4

Because Patriarchy. Obviously.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:25 PM
6

"But Raping Is Free," the latest smash hit single by the death emo band, 99 Problems With You. Buy it on iTunes and Amazon today!
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:52 PM
–

Should I buy this yogurt or should I rape that woman by the cheese? The yogurt tastes good, but raping is free. Hmmm. /s
/r/MensRights28/07/12 10:08 AM
1

You have experienced the confusion common to dealing with radical feminism. Side effects are confusion brow, mouth hang, and head shake syndrome. You may involuntarily utter expletives for no apparent reason. This is normal. Fortunately, side effects are temporary. If you don't have access to facts to counter the logic poison, a quick solution is to hop. The soothing reality of gravity is a quick fix for exposure to radical feminism.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:21 PM
1

Won't someone please think of the science?!
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:54 PM
0

I made it 14 seconds in.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:50 PM
2

64oz 99% Logic-free Indignity Cola. Indigola. /lazy rock music /woman smile laughing while stealing a man's drink /coy wink, then drinking stolen item Don't worry about the facts. Do it your way. Indigola.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:40 PM
1

Now there's a boxing match I'd like to see.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:17 PM
1

Well, you're giving them enough credit for making it from a to b. That's pretty high up the alphabet for these kind of people.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:09 PM
3

Judge: "She's a delightful mother when with her other children. I can't in good conscious deny the children their mother." /s
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:06 PM
-1

The correct answer is Control+W and muttering, "Jesus Christ, you fucking retards."
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:02 PM
2

Ah, Bergeron. That story should be the mantra of the MRA counter-feminist argument. Whenever you come face-to-face with ignorance, just start quoting from the story in a meditative voice.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:59 PM
2

So having two parents in your life is bad for you. Huh.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:50 PM
–

Now there's a way to validate your beliefs: let's have an arena where people fight to death over their religious beliefs. Wait.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:48 PM
1

Obviously, the woman is being protected in that most of the man's money goes to her so he can't buy raping paraphernalia.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:31 PM
–

She assaults him while he's in the hospital severely injured. In other words, she tried to murder him.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:07 AM
2

Facts: They leave a bad taste in your mouth.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 02:49 PM
11

... research ... shows ... candidate gender quotas are a successful contributor to increas[e] ... representation So when you pass a law to force a certain type of person to get a certain number of spots in a concrete group, the percentage of that type of person being represented in that group increases? I had no idea. /s
/r/MensRights21/07/12 04:15 PM
10

Ohhhh.... Don't. Momma raised me all kinds of wrong then.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 01:13 AM
–

The demands of a female... I was going to say reporter, but... and now I've ruined my joke. Good thing I'm male and expectations were low. There we go.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:44 PM
6

This doesn't expose her as a fraud. For her to be a fraud in this context, she'd have to be a non-feminist using fake feminist ideals to get the money. More like it explains her game plan, which was pretty clear from anyone not drinking her kool-aid.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 12:37 AM
18

Fear not, the link at the bottom of the page is where it's really at: What is the female equivalent of a misogynist? A misogynist is a man who hates women. A woman who hates men can be described as a misandrist, and the corresponding noun is misandry. But however prevalent the attitudes described by these words may be, the words themselves aren't common. There are currently only 23 examples of misandrist in the Oxford English Corpus, while misogynist appears more than 1,200 times; 37 uses of mis…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:32 AM
–

Here's a whistle.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:30 AM
5

You're treating the chaff as the movement itself.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:05 PM
–

It's all in the sidebar. -->
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:30 PM
5

Looks like ex-girlfriend material.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:29 PM
2

Oh you.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:06 PM
–

It's easy when you write both sides of the conversation.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:27 PM
–

Rewording for truth > Removal > Original They chose the easiest option above doing nothing. Someone had to be downer in the thread and this time it was me.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:35 PM
–

It'll never be more accurate on that site.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:29 PM
–

Removed. Instead of wording it to be more accurate. Okay.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:04 AM
1

Just register WomanCantStopRapeOrAnythingElseBecauseOnlyMenCanStopDoingThings.org Done.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:26 AM
1

Dick is too harsh; so is abuser. Let's clean it up further! Don't interact with non-like-minded-people. There we go. Wait...
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:39 AM
–

5 years from now: 61% of women say they wouldn't day men who are unemployed. "As 65% of men 21 and older don't have a college degree, basing romantic involvement on employment is more difficult." 10 years from now: 15% of women prefer unemployed men as romantic partners. "It just helps to be the breadwinner. You get to set the playing field." 15 years from now: 65% of men have taken to domestication classes. "My grandfather tells stories of the crap he had to do to get laid once. I sit at home, …
/r/MensRights27/06/12 09:35 PM
2

Both OP and article author just wanted to make their post more eye-catching with needless social implication matters.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 04:57 AM
5

I guess no one remembers Dawson's Creek.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 04:48 AM
7

If you're going to use a convoluted book to raise your children, I can use convoluted logic to counter. God didn't gift Eve to Adam. Adam paid a rib tax and Eve was created with it. So Adam paid for Eve. Doesn't sound like property at all.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 02:48 AM
3

Hey. Don't insult 12 year olds. It takes an intelligent mind to write an article that stupid.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:41 AM
1

The "can't we all just get alone" angle has never worked in the history of getting angles to work. Also, it helps to have more than one period in a paragraph. If you said all that out loud, you'd pass out halfway through.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:41 AM
1

This isn't Andy Dick?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:29 AM
1

I stopped when: Boss: (paraphrasing) I don't care you have a secret identity. /done That was a long time ago.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:11 PM
1

Hoax is a word thrown around so often these days.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:53 PM
4

Operator: Come again? Wife: I was minding my own business and he walked into the room. Operator: Then what happened? Wife: Then he said it... Operator: Said what? Wife: Why are the dishes still in the sink? Operator: What? Wife: I know. His tone was so arrogant. Operator: But he didn't tell you to do them. Wife: No, but it was implied. Operator: Did he assault you? Wife: Other than the indignant thought I should have done those dishes just because I was home all day? Operator: ...Yes. Wife: I wa…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:49 PM
2

Had no idea. Saw him on Community recently and that was too much.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:43 PM
-5

There is a lot of evidence of the woman being a paranoid drug addict who bought guns to hide around the house. But no articles I've come across mention her being anything more than an attention-hungry woman who acted out for said attention. By all accounts I've seen, the first act of actual domestic abuse was the murder.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:43 PM
2

I don't keep up on celebrities. So I don't get the reference.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:33 PM
2

True. Though the only reason she did it was because she killed her husband. After she left the home, called two people to confess, and returned to wait while the police arrived. Whether she did it to escape justice or through remorse we'll never know.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:33 PM
3

Always. But the final arguments of many marriages are spectacularly common.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:31 PM
–

I read that; crazy as hell. I never liked Andy Dick, but now I have legitimate reason not to like him.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:13 AM
3

Temper, temper.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:47 AM
–

Euphemism speculation does no one any good.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:40 AM
-1

Don't you know? Every woman is a women's group. They're like Mormons. Even if a particular women doesn't ascribe to their views, they will count her anyway.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:33 AM
–

Cohabitation isn't the problem. Marriage is the problem. Not the idea of marriage, but the rules of marriage. You've lived together for years, but now you're married. Things are "different." Freedoms you had are gone. Why? I don't know. They just are. We're married. Women expect more from a husband. And god forbid a man expects more from his wife. Before it was all right to let the dishes sit awhile because things were cool. It was fun to "argue" over the relationship roles because that was fun …
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:16 AM
–

She was high on cocaine and drunk when she shot him then herself. There is no evidence she was abusive. There's one reference in Hartman's wikipedia page to her having a temper. But as many men in this subreddit can attest, a temper does not equate abuse.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:03 AM
1

I highly doubt Romney knows what TANF entails. To him its "welfare." He sees increasing the work hours requirement as a deterrent and barrier, which will reduce spending (theoretically). While his ignorance might imply the connection the OP has made. Romney himself has not made such as statement. If he demonstrated that level of policy understanding, he wouldn't be such a lame duck to his party.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:47 AM
–

Actually, given the high rate of men going to jail because they lost their job while trying to pay outrageous alimony and child support--payments which don't change despite inability to pay--the date would probably always be in the future. Might as well call everyday last year's Men's Right Day.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:53 PM
1

I was being sarcastic. Which is #2.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:38 PM
1

That's not ironic. There's no rain or weddings.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:29 PM
6

I'm currently poor. Awaiting someone to bestow upon me my "suit jacket" so I can clean up and succeed.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:28 PM
10

I doubt it. She spends too much time ending sentences with prepositions.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:20 PM
2

It doesn't. Some threads have to be connected. This is the most explicit mention: |If a married couple receives federally funded child care, [blah blah] The article doesn't mention federally funded child care for single mothers--all of whom have "fit and willing unmarried fathers" according to the OP.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:16 PM
–

I can make up holidays too. From henceforth, January 15th is Men's Right Day! Let's follow the logic! According to feminism, the man-fueled Patriarcy causes all problems. All is infinity. The only entity that can affect infinity is a god. To quote one such god, "I am alpha and omega." A = 1 0 = 15 1/15 January 15th. Mark your calendars.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:07 PM
1

I would write that book. Then do what I could to get it displayed on the related items of the original book. Hilarity ensues.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:19 PM
0

Femperialists. Darth Vajajay. Leia Furwalker. Hand Solo. Hmm.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:17 PM
2

I say. "Can't post here?!" I surely can. I'll just make a new account and-- /pulls out wallet /scrounges through Dear me! I can't find my Troll Society card! Oh, right. I'm not a member.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:10 PM
–

While most men ... seem to have a desperate need for status symbols ... most women are far too intelligent to need such baubles. I laughed.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:44 PM
3

I wrote a long comment detailing fifteen points why I believe your statement is one of the dumbest I've heard. Then I remembered I could just downvote.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:52 AM
1

I'm with bigjo66. If there was evidence the woman's crimes were reduced only in the case of male elderly, that's be a clear case for anti-male behavior. Men and women were harmed in this crime and a lame judge didn't do their job. This one case doesn't have an inherent correlation to frame it as a MR issue.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:37 AM
1

I have. A decade ago. It was a lovely place then. Probably isn't half bad now. It won't be in three decades when the children now are adults and have been infused with gender-phobia; unable to interact with the opposite sex the moment blood rushes in any direction.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 10:58 PM
1

I have little faith 'hen' will benefit intersex people. I view Sweden as the fair left liberal end of human social spectrum. The far right being countries like North Korea and Syria. Sweden isn't anymore right in their idea of society than Syria. And before anyone exclaims, "But Syria kills people!" Let me condescend: Is it better to be murdered or to live a lifetime in a country than tells you every bodily urge is bad for you, your loved ones, and the world? That you must think the same way abo…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 10:20 PM
2

I did. And it could very well be real. Just seems like a really odd spelling error to be accidental: fetminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:37 PM
–

I meant this particular image.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:58 PM
1

I'm not saying you used the wrong quote. It's just that the quote has been used quite a lot in the last year alone, particularly in politics. The "oh, that's nice" feeling one gets from an appropriate and well-timed quote is missing for me with this one.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:35 PM
–

I think it's a joke because the URL is wrong: http://www.facebook.com/whoneedsfetminism But then I could be giving too much credit to the actual group. Or not enough credit to the guy who purposefully broke the URL. Or over-thinking it all.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:27 PM
2

You mean "don't do," I'm assuming.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:58 PM
–

I really dislike this quote. I get the point and don't disagree. But I really dislike this quote.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:45 PM
1

Well. Twilight.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:44 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:50 PM
–

The second commenter seems to be laughing at the woman in the article for what she said. That's not misandry. I'd rather have the actual article featured in the image posted here instead of one featuring the comments of ignorant people.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:16 PM
9

I once slept with my boss. He wasn't gay, nor was I. But I got that promotion! Later, he came out and was fired. And I got another promotion. His job. /sarcasm This article frames a woman's sex as a weapon against straight men. What if her male boss is gay. Or a straight female?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:51 PM
–

Seems unprofessional to taunt co-workers with your "other options."
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:50 PM
5

ditto.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:40 PM
–

Right, because humans are the only species with gender. I sometimes forget evolution is just a theory. And that two centuries of feminist philosophy overturns millions of years of theoretical species development across millions of species with gender. Will you teach female gorillas sign language so you can explain to them how they don't have to be slaves to the males? What about lions? I mean those females are so oppressed in their gender roles. I hope your campaign to convince them to fight for…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:54 PM
–

When pupils play house, they are encouraged to include "mommy, daddy, child" in their imaginary families, as well as "daddy, daddy, child"; "mommy, mommy, child"; "daddy, daddy, sister, aunty, child"; or any other modern combination. Couldn't they have just said: When pupils plays house, they are encouraged to include homosexual parent pairings as well as heterosexual and any other modern combination. And: One Swedish school got rid of its toy cars because boys ... ascribed [them] higher status …
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:49 PM
5

Framing anything PETA-related as anti-male gives the entire organization too much credit. If women constituted the brunt of fisherman, it would be aimed at them. They also recently attacked fat people. Simply a means to an end.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:49 PM
1

I believe feminists hate these kind of women more than anyone else. Patriarch Whores I've heard them called.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:50 PM
1

You're right. You're right. 79.49%. I'm sorry for editorializing.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:13 PM
1

Heh. Logic. You so crazy.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:59 PM
–

"This one time at band camp I found out my male co-camp counselor made a dollar more than me per hour. We had the same position! So I sued and they had to fire him. "Watching him pack up his five "Best Camp Counselor of the Year" awards was gratifying because I knew I'd done something good for women everywhere."
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:55 PM
–

80% of people know that.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:50 PM
3

The logic, it burns! IT BURNS!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:48 PM
1

I would debate sexy, but okay.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:47 PM
–

I like how you're aware of yourself 1000 times over.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:45 PM
1

Sperm flow shouldn't be inhibited anymore than the female body should think its pregnant all the time. But that argument doesn't float when there's sex to be had.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:41 PM
2

And his +2 Raping stick.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:37 PM
2

Which is why I didn't get pissy about it.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:47 PM
–

I don't believe in blanket government access to birth control. If you have a medically relevant need for birth control--ovarian cysts, for example--then just like a diabetic, you should get your life-saving medication via your health insurance. Everyone else should pay for it. This includes Viagra and similar sexual modification drugs.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 12:44 AM
–

Men's studies. You mean history? EDIT: I saw all these negative comments and I thought, what the hell? Then I looked and saw part of my comment was left off: /hurr hurr I was making a joke of another thread a while back in which the above was a reply.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 12:39 AM
3

Indeed, good points all around. With the rise of the feminist mother and decline of the father role, a young male won't have many of the male-assertive traits which leads to proactive sexual experiences at the expense of romance.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 12:37 AM
1

As I'm saying, a punch to the head while driving: instant breakup. He considered the pros and cons of potentially causing a car accident and choose to proceed on a whim of personal benefit. This is different than a two-way physical altercation. You could have lost control of the car and collided with another vehicle or even a person. From which you'd probably suffer most of the resulting manslaughter charge. I'll grant that in the specific moment you might not stop and force him out like I would…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 06:45 PM
2

That makes for a great anti-immigration pamphlet: Knock up an American woman, even if you don't have sex and lose all your money. Maybe go to jail, maybe get kicked out of the country. So save yourself the time by not coming at all. (I'm not anti-immigrant. Just sayin'.)
/r/MensRights07/04/12 03:18 PM
4

I made no claim otherwise except to position ignorance before isms. Can't have an ism without ignorance.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:42 AM
4

Can you imagine men-only scholarships? Please. Men-only anything gets sued to hell while women-only institutions thrive.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:40 AM
1

They were his friends and family. People you ostensibly wouldn't care about after the broke up. Any shared friends who wouldn't hear or believe your side of the story aren't friends anyway and therefore don't count.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:39 AM
–

99% of the time, when the question is "Why does [person] [do thing]?" The answer is ignorance. Feminist or otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:38 AM
1

Somewhere a rich, evil feminist rubs her hands together. "Yesss... throw your condoms away."
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:32 AM
–

It's an MMA fighter. None of those M's stand for Mensa. Or anything else indicative of intelligence.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:29 AM
1

The mere mention of the mythical "great" sex is sure to send them into a sargasm. I can see it now: "Oh boy. First he beats, then he rapes. /stabbyface" "Just another example of the patriarchy glorifying sexual conquest through force." "I have a great idea. I'm going to make a new account: facepunchini6969. I'm going to concoct a fantastic tale of my "girlfriend" stealing my monies, sleeping around, and then pulls out a knife and cuts me. Then I hit her upside her head, not hard, then run to cop…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:22 AM
1

Anyone dumb enough to hit the driver of a moving vehicle isn't worth being with. And that's before the physical abuse is addressed. "You thought it'd be a good idea to hit me in the head while I'm driving down the highway? "Get out. "And you're not getting back in because you fucking punched me." Done.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:14 AM
–

Meh. It's Etsy. That's like Jezebel giving 10 women $5,000 each to attend, well, not writing workshops, but something like them. I could make male-oriented examples, but any logical person can so I won't.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:53 PM
–

If the main goal of "the game" is to corner women into self-doubt and a facade of lies. To facilitate education of women to counter "the game" is like shooting yourself in the foot. Then giving the gun to the woman, telling her to shoot you in the other foot. Also, this has nothing to do with MR.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:07 PM
4

I like how there isn't a single fact or source in the article.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:57 AM
–

/walks a lonely highway /shifts backpack /thumb out as car passes /theme music to Incredible Hulk plays
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:39 AM
7

/runs toward this beautiful future /collides with painted rock wall Damn you, roadrunner!
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:33 AM
2

The important part of that article: Look, I am kind of an idiot.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:30 AM
–

This implies it was ever worthwhile to argue with willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:21 AM
1

If she was stealing a condom for its juices, I doubt she'd be pregnant at that moment.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:19 AM
2

I found the video from this post, but felt the video deserved its own post.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:12 PM
–

Considering how one of the main points of MR is how feminism ignores the existence of male victims, I don't see how I've lowered anything except to reduce the issue to something like a bad poem. Maybe that's what you meant. That my unintentional poem sucks. I can take that. Or maybe you missed the sarcasm. That happens to the best of us.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:09 PM
1

I found the video from this post, but felt the video deserved its own post.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:02 PM
1

Relevant to golf: the LPGA, the Women's version of the PGA. Check the PDF. There's no official rule in the PGA (or Augustus) saying women can't join, but there is a specific, official rule in the LPGA preventing men from joining. Also, the issue with Augustus isn't new.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:49 PM
-1

He's like a pug. So fucking ugly. And yet you love the little fucker for being so ugly.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:30 PM
–

You do have credibility in this society, and your well deserved vindication is coming. Translation: The collar we put around your neck will be lined with satin instead of wool.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:26 PM
3

"You're being stupid." /click Done.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:25 PM
–

Let's make it simple: Your children will turn out like their mother unless you intervene. If that's doesn't move your ass, you might as well sever ties completely and stop being a father.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:23 PM
1

Never mind! I want a brovorce! Move out. Give me half your stuff and 30% of your income for as long as I hold any negative opinion about you. I get the children: Brozeus and Chestbump. I will turn them against you by telling them you raped me at MLB 2K11 and then went around fistbumping everyone we knew while I stayed home with your sick kegmother. And if you're late on even a single brolimony payment, I'll have you thrown in jail where they will make you straighten your cap. STRAIGHTEN. YOUR. C…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:04 PM
–

A good, nurturing mother doesn't inflict an abusive rapist on her children. Or drugs. She may have the temperament of a good mother, but she is not one.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:55 PM
–

Proving your ex-spouse is unfit is pretty standard in custody cases, right? Get proof. Give proof to lawyer. Lawyer gives proof to judge. Get kids. Leave.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:47 PM
2

It goes a very long way.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:30 PM
1

The friend suggested the action; the woman wanted to flee. The wife herself hasn't engaged in or suggested a plan to use the system to punish the theoretically asshole husband. As stated, there is much context missing.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 03:33 PM
–

But it's a boy. Boys can't be victims. We know this. Because feminism.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:58 PM
–

Abstinence. It's not just for narrow-minded Christians anymore. Paid for by Logic. If you don't want to be accused to rape in these modern times, don't have sex. Otherwise... There is no otherwise. You're a man. Therefore you are a rapist. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:54 PM
1

Sweden is the dadaists of society. If they did it ironically, they'd be Hipster Sweden. But they're serious, so they just make crappy social art.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:48 PM
–

Before that, sign these life insurance papers. Ensuring our love will go on forever.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:44 PM
10

I bet she's the first voted off the island.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:39 PM
–

I WILL BAKE YOU A CAKE FILLED WITH POISON LOVE.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:34 PM
–

Give me a hug, you beautiful only-good-for-sperm-and-divorce man. I'm sorry. That crossed a line. I shouldn't make fun of your face like that.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:20 PM
–

The most important question: If she's not currently married, why is she on a show called Housewives of [city]?
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:11 PM
–

I HATE YOU. With love.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:10 PM
3

Like I said. There is a lot of missing context.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 01:23 PM
1

But I live for those episodes where the female cop gets hardcore about a rape case. And then we hear her own rape story at the end while her partner stands around blankface.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:53 AM
–

There's a lot of context missing here. Her friend might be a gold-digging cunt, but there are legitimately abusive men out there. MR isn't trying to disprove that. This woman might be in danger, especially if she's considering fleeing before divorce.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:24 AM
2

Exactly. /monocle
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:13 PM
–

Feminism was created by the patriarchy as a means to-- Wait. I've said too much.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:56 PM
1

Things I didn't see: Muslims. They could have at least picked a Muslim (or suitably darker-skinned) female actor to wear the headdress naked. Have they never heard of PR message consistency? But I suppose that would assume these women are making full use of a college education. And not using their bodies in a way which dilutes their overall message. God forbid the folks at FEMEN are taking advantage of dumb, hot chicks for the group's political goals.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 09:09 AM
3

The feminist response: Oh. My. God. They drugged the woman and set a sexual predator on her at the end. She was raped as a joke! I guess that makes them even for the infidelity and emasculation. Or it's just a crappy episode of a shitty show feeding off the bones of marginally better shows. Next up: The Flintstones remake!
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:47 PM
1

That's not the lesson of the month. That's the lesson of every fucking second.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:25 AM
6

As a lawyer, that man knew exactly how bad video evidence of him bad-mouthing his wife would play against him. He worded his shit extremely carefully because he's not stupid... enough to give his ex-wife more ammunition against him.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:23 AM
0

Maybe this is SRS and we're just the next level down. We need to go deeper.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 02:42 PM
1

If her children turn out to be non-Christian, she simply dunked them in water.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 02:40 PM
2

That's like years and tens of thousands of dollars on the Adjust Gender Jailtime/Fine Schedule.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 02:39 PM
0

I think many people play up the situation to illicit more sympathy and care out of their significant other. Everyone likes to be taken care of when they aren't 100%. But playing at suffering is different than taking valuable time off if you need the money. If the woman were the sicker partner, her man should 'soldier on' to bring her medicine while she 'goes down with the [woman] flu.' Tagline: When she needs you, you don't have time to be sick. Well, I couldn't find a copy of the ad, so maybe t…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 02:37 PM
–

I remember the scandal back when a can of jelly appeared on the cover of Peanut Butter monthly. Those P&B enthusiasts went nuts.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 09:47 AM
2

/tv static News: Study shows an increasing number of Americans aren't eating at pre-defined meal times, instead opting to free whenever they are hungry. /tv static Dr. Phil: You're fat! Say it with me: I'm fat! /tv static Psychologist: Men want sex and if they can't get it or aren't man enough to take it, this leads to a self-destructive behavior of over-consumption. /tv static News: A new study says that if you don't want children, you're likely to spend nearly identical amounts of money on thi…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 08:48 AM
–

We can call it, Out of Context. First episode: News: "Is Feminism Making Women Fat?" Commercial: "Don't eat just one Dove nugget. Indulge. Eat two. Commercial: "Milanos. Not just for the good times."
/r/MensRights01/04/12 07:23 AM
–

"Tomorrow on Maury. These women find out who's their baby's daddy." Indignant Woman in Audience: You did the deed, boi, you gotta pay for the crime. /crowd cheers Man: She slept with three men that night! /crowd boos at man /woman attacks man /crowd cheers "Tune in at 3."
/r/MensRights01/04/12 07:17 AM
3

If the alleged perpetrator were male, would a judge go out of his way to verify the accuser's truthfulness? I imagine the judge didn't bring up the idea, but the woman's lawyer. /reads article Yup.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 05:25 AM
–

For me, the main problem is that everyone in that room woke up that morning to yet another day of being an idiot. The audience, the black man, and certainly that Jabba the Hutt impersonator. And then the people on stage were paid to go on and be more of an idiot. On purpose.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 05:20 AM
-8

Quite. /drinks tea, pinky up
/r/MensRights31/03/12 05:19 AM
1

ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ "Seriously. Gross." Wait, I'm not a teenage girl.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 05:17 AM
2

He was about to be divorced from two of his toes.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:41 PM
2

The article states he really didn't want to go to the hospital for his diabetic-related surgery.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:41 PM
3

The saddest forever alones.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 03:49 PM
2

I want to see a Google "all hands on deck" meeting. Or Microsoft. Or Apple. Or Oracle. Or Facebook. What do you mean these organizations span the world?! I must know that every single employee's opinion has been delivered and considered in a round table discussion where everyone held hands and felt needed.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 03:44 PM
1

Dammit. I should have. Would have taken less time to write.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:30 AM
1

"Yes, please make it easier for lesser qualified people to represent/treat/teach/police me." Man or woman of any race, that's the statement being made when people agree to affirmative action.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:22 AM
1

The article isn't stating the woman might not be guilty. But that the pre-verdict shame storm will ruin this woman's life if the man turns out to have lied. If you reverse the gender, this is the exact situation we men fear in a False Rape Society. Where did I pull that term from... hmmm.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:19 AM
1

Jam is bad ass. Blackberry jam in particular.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:12 AM
–

I'm filled with such rage at this article. Quick! Find me a woman to beat. I have no other recourse for the testosterone coursing through my feeble man brain!
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:21 PM
2

That sounds like logic, sir. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:17 PM
-1

There is such as a thing as learning to deal with bad things that have happened with you and moving on. I'm doing that here. For my penis' sake. Wait, I meant my ego's sake.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:58 PM
-1

Simple google searches return research for all those points I made about events that change brain chemistry. The loss of sexual function of the penis? My penis functions great. That it might work a bit better uncircumcised is useless information to me and doesn't detract from my enjoyment of sex--or life--at all.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:04 PM
–

I can not speak to something I'll never experience. Nor can any circumcised person. Which is why I believe any misgivings about a circumcised penis is manufactured by the man when they're old enough to form (or be told) an convoluted opinion about it. My penis works great and sex is awesome. That it could be X% better isn't worth worrying about. Should we stop mutilating little boys? Yes. Would I opt for circumcision as an adult? Of course not. But that doesn't mean much of these life-long negat…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:01 PM
–

I must be extremely lucky not to be one of these men with terrible life conditions caused by small incisions decades ago. I'm not depressed. I don't have PTSD. My pain threshold is good. I don't have that "pain" when I ejaculate. Maybe that is why. It ain't happening to me so I can't see it.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:23 PM
–

You know what also modifies a baby's brain chemistry: Imprinting on a parent, bad diet, neglect, physical abuse, weather, allergies, and a thousand other things. I did mention physical abuse, does this mean I'm losing my own argument?! No. Just because the brain has changed because of external damage doesn't mean it will lead to life-long emotional damage. When I was old enough to crawl, I crawled off ledge and just about died from the fall. I'm sure my brain chemistry was changed by that too. A…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:20 PM
–

Large portions of the modern world have been circumcising for thousands of years. Are you saying that billions of people have been suffering PTSD and suicidal notions because of their circumcision all while getting up, going to work, providing for their family, living their life, fucking, laughing, crying, and having more babies? Again. I'm not saying circumcisions not something we couldn't do without. I'm saying I don't buy this PTSD angle.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:03 PM
–

Yeah, I read that article. You mean correlation. Not causation.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:00 PM
–

A total of 16 people -- 10 men and six women -- The 4 woman the title mentions are new women. Evening out a 20-person group. cut or shave the beard hair of the male victims and the head hair of the female victims Men and women victims. Mullet, the bishop of the Amish community in the village of Bergholz, Ohio, was also additionally charged of making false statements to federal agents during the investigation. Many of the other accused are members of Mullet's own family. Perpetrated by mainly one…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:49 PM
2

And I upvot-- Oh ho. You's a tricky one.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:39 PM
–

For me it would be extra. Since I've never had it in my conscious life.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:36 PM
3

I'm working my ass here not going to college nor aiming for the top job, and still I get no respect. I tell ya, no respect.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:13 PM
–

I can't upvote your bad spelling and lack of capitalization and commas. Even if I agree with your comment. And would defend to death your ability to bad spelling and lack of capitalization and commas. I can not in good conscious upvote.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:10 PM
1

I... /cries
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:35 AM
–

Also in that future TIME issue, hidden deep within: Did you know men are getting smarter? A new study has shown that across the board degrees for men are the rise after a six decade decline that hit record lows in 2021 and stayed there for nearly three decades. Alarmingly, this increase is offset by a nearly identical decrease in degrees awarded to woman. "I just want to raise a family," said 25-year old Sandra W. "This pressure to work, work, work is too much. Why should I get pregnant and work…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:03 AM
2

Sounds like a nice little scam to me.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:40 AM
3

That was my favorite fairy tale as a little boy!
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:31 AM
2

That, sir, sounds like logic.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:01 AM
1

Replying to myself on an old thread: The banking trend leading to the 2008 economic collapse had nothing to do with feminism An article appeared on reddit 4 days after my comment: Women executives in banks prone to more risk taking. Ostensibly, its deal with German banks, but a corollary can be applied to American banks. If true, the presence of anti-stereotypical risk-taking female bankers would invalidate my statement that feminism didn't help the 2008 economic collapse.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:55 AM
1

Does this unanimous fact about suicidal and circumcised girls account for the bevy of religious, social, and gender-based hostilities forced on those girls? Doesn't appear to. The book just presents the "fact" without any context. Putting the onus of discovery on the reader. In other words: Fox News.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:46 AM
–

I was circumcised as an infant and I don't have panic attacks about an event I can't remember. Maybe the PTSD is that weird feeling I get when I look at hot women? Up until now, I assumed that was attraction, but now I learn its a misunderstood suicidal notion that the moment would be so much better with an extra inch of skin on my junk. God, I didn't realize I had soo many suicidal thoughts. Let's be clear: I'm not saying circumcision isn't an issue. I'm saying the PTSD connection is loose.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:40 AM
2

If I want to find my tennis ball, I'll go with the dog. But if I want to find truffles, you gotta go with the pig.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:42 AM
1

Atheists must have a field day with this organization. "I wonder how God feels about having His words changed. Since He said they couldn't be, I'm sure the chap's not happy at all."
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:28 AM
1

I like how she talks about getting a 1000 subscriptions from non-MRA sources in one day, the so-called "blue pills," then talks about them as if they weren't going to be watching.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:14 AM
1

I'll quote myself from two different threads in this post: Then write a blog or article and include this link with your spiel above. Then the link becomes part of a men's right issue. The link nor case--by itself--has any context which frames it as a men's right issue. You can't show someone an article about something awful happening to a male and expect the reader to assume it's anti-male. Certainly when nothing in the article hints at any kind of anti-male influence. When feminists do that, we…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:02 AM
1

I'll quote myself from a different thread in this post: Then write a blog or article and include this link with your spiel above. Then the link becomes part of a men's right issue. The link nor case--by itself--has any context which frames it as a men's right issue. You can't show someone an article about something awful happening to a male and expect the reader to assume it's anti-male. Certainly when nothing in the article hints at any kind of anti-male influence. When feminists do that, we go…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:18 AM
–

Personally speaking, I'd wager the women voting for the bill were lobbied to do so. The mandated examination will be an increasing source of revenue for insurance companies as they bet on abortion eventually winning its freedom, so to speak. Making this less of a stupid woman issue and more of a corrupt politician issue.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 03:17 AM
1

I edited my comment to reflect the MR community.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 03:15 AM
1

Then write a blog or article and include this link with your spiel above. Then the link becomes part of a men's right issue. The link nor case--by itself--has any context which frames it as a men's right issue. You can't show someone an article about something awful happening to a male and expect the reader to assume it's anti-male. Certainly when nothing in the article hints at any kind of anti-male influence. When feminists do that, we go nuts.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 03:08 AM
1

Plus even if we ever got to a non-biased educational system, that doesn't mean the gender distribution of classes would magically become 50/50.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:56 AM
3

I highly doubt I'd ask to marry a woman who'd suggest that ring. The warning signs would be early, often, and attached with fog horns.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:53 AM
1

The reason this isn't an MR issue is that the woman was caught, sentenced, and jailed. So far there isn't an hint of anti-male movement to prevent this woman from suffering her penalty. I highly doubt this woman looked at the six year old boy and said, "I hate men so much I'm going to rape you like how every man rapes women." She's just sick in the head. Thus this case is not a Men's Right issue.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:41 AM
1

The reason this isn't an MR issue is that the woman was caught, sentenced, and jailed. So far there isn't an hint of anti-male movement to prevent this woman from suffering her penalty. I highly doubt this woman looked at the six year old boy and said, "I hate men so much I'm going to rape you like how every man rapes women." She's just sick in the head. Thus this case is not a Men's Right issue.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:41 AM
1

In the "future," Japanese high school students lose all respect for law and begin terrorizing the adults. So the adults ship off entire classes to an island where they must fight to the death or die via explosive collar. The survivor gets one wish and returns to society. If you don't see the big flaw in the story already, well...
/r/MensRights26/03/12 12:04 PM
5

That's just retarded.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:59 AM
1

It's not the first time a subreddit was pushed out the brain canal to languish in the internet's desert.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:57 AM
–

Repost. And also not a Men's Right issue. You don't have to be feminist to be sick in the head.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:50 AM
1

That would be true in America. Or Europe. Where there is no active pursuit of stealing a man's seed. And while I'm sure the men wouldn't turn down the sex with beautiful women. It's the ritual aspect of what the sperm is being used for that likely gives them pause. It's like if you believe in Satanic rituals, you still wouldn't want your blood being used in one, even if it was meant to affect a third party.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 08:55 AM
3

We also learn new spellings for words.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 01:48 AM
–

I'm getting tired of this story. It's not related to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 01:44 AM
3

No there's not. And that's the problem this guy has.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 01:42 AM
1

So... virginal otaku are our only hope for mankind?!
/r/MensRights24/03/12 09:01 AM
1

I can't fault you for making the comment. I posted the link for this thread and after replying to your comment, I realized my title was equally specious. I agree that the motivation/reward cycle has been skewed in the last several decades. But also that an increase in feministic mothers causes a decline in mothers who push their sons to be aggressive in their social and financial endeavors.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:59 AM
1

Sexism aside, it's just a terrible ad.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:29 AM
1

Dead people need a voice too! Why aren't there more ghost editors?
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:20 AM
-5

Note the website here to the immediate right of this post. At this website, there are lots of cited articles that heavily rely on research. There is also another kind of comment. It is known in the online world as an opinion comment. Really, people have been writing and reading them for ages. They're all the rage. Since your criticism of the criticism is that the criticism is one kind, instead of another, you might want to consider never commenting again, because this site has that annoying habi…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:14 AM
2

The only constructive man-up advice is the type you give yourself in your own head. How do I learn this self-"man up" technique? I want to practice.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:07 AM
–

Your phrasing choices compel me to suggest you get help.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:02 AM
1

Specious. This summer in America when gas prices average $5/gallon will have nothing to do with feminism, but with greedy businessmen. The banking trend leading to the 2008 economic collapse had nothing to do with feminism, but with greedy businessmen. When the banks buttoned up and wouldn't loan out money, extending the economic decline, that had nothing to do with feminism. But with greedy businessmen. You're just looking a graph where X female-value is going up, comparing it to another graph …
/r/MensRights24/03/12 07:55 AM
1

You have it backwards. Men's right issues are part of men's issues.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 07:27 PM
–

So it's a men's right issue if there's an increase in men struck by lightning? Or an increase of men whose appendix's burst? Or my boredom derived from my girlfriend's uncle's long-winded monotone diatribes about Obama being a "Muslum"? That's an MR issue? What about my suffering at the hands of your shallow logic? Disease is not a men's right issue unless it can be shown the disease is being forced on men. Nothing of the sort is presented in that article; it doesn't even mention a gender differ…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:39 PM
1

Nothing of that is presented in this article.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:24 PM
–

No. Women wear high heels for themselves!
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:36 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:32 PM
2

Though a disturbing trend if true--something the article itself debates--this is unrelated to MR. There is a comment by a father stating a belief of a third-party that ''all men are autistic to a some degree or other." Something the man himself didn't belief. And even if he did; still not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:18 PM
5

Someone mistook crazy for sexist again. Silly rabbit.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:42 AM
–

There's no information about her "being supported by feminism in jail." I don't know what "spend some some years drinking mate" means. And this isn't a MR issue. You don't have to be sexist to be crazy.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:39 AM
1

This isn't a case of women aggressively hunting men in sexist retaliation. According to the article, the sperm is being used for rituals and other nonsense to con money out of stupid people who think sperm has magical "juju." And later in the article, it speaks of men coercing young men to imbibe, pick up hookers, and return their used condoms.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter