TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

soloreddit Archive

View 1 post and 57 comments by soloreddit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There's no report of an arrest and no verification that he wasn't making it all up.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 10:01 PM
5

This is a good point, I just felt as though given the circumstances, it was a rather ludicrous idea to entertain. But you're right, have an upvote.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 05:51 PM
–

Furthermore, this sentence: "She allegedly served him alcohol and, according to police, the two became involved in a consensual sexual relationship." Not according to Connecticut law they didn't. Age of consent is 16 there, 18 if the other party is considered in an authority position. They do allow for a 3 year Romeo & Juliet gap, but that's it. Not consensual.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 05:50 PM
19

You can thank John Walsh in particular for that. He goes around the country telling parents to never hire men as babysitters.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 09:07 PM
1

Not trying to, but I speak from experience. It turned out okay in the end, but it could have been really, really bad.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 01:42 PM
1

Condoms break; accidental pregnancy happens. They're far from foolproof. I basically treat condoms as essential to prevent STDs, but as utterly useless as the sole method of preventing pregnancy.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 01:28 PM
9

In many men, after years of having a vasectomy the body develops antibodies to your sperm cells and actually begins to kill them off. Even if reversal is possible, you may be completely sterile after the fact. Which is frankly fine by me, I don't want kids! But you should know the risks.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 01:26 PM
2

Ahhh, that's possible. I thought they were trying to compare violence with how England did this cup vs last cup. I'm reading too much into it, sorry.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 09:26 PM
2

More importantly, "Same day last year" makes no sense, because the World Cup is only played every 4 years.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 08:59 PM
–

Anyone else suddenly have the urge to video tape every single interaction with women, solely for evidence? I'm honestly getting to the point where I'm afraid to invite a woman over, for fear that she'll turn out to be a loon and accuse me of rape, even if nothing at all transpired.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 12:01 AM
4

It doesn't seem like there is any connection to it, the photo shoot is just that, a photo shoot. The idea that men cannot possibly control themselves around her, so she can't wear heels...that is preposterous. If it has any merit, then that is utterly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 01:05 PM
17

The one thing that stood out to me was the author's claim that women were better suited to child care & early education. That's a largely unquantifiable claim. Men can simply not be a part of those careers thanks to hysteria over pedophilia & molestation. We aren't welcome and are told to go elsewhere. I've been told by several male teachers that their female colleagues, principals, etc., have told them to teach high school, because grade/primary school is no place for men. Speaking as someone r…
/r/MensRights09/06/10 12:50 PM
4

I'm allowed to wear shorts & t-shirts, so I'm lucky in that regard. If you're wearing a suit and they're allowed to wear sandals, then either you're overdressing or they are severely underdressing. A suit is business formal, sandals wouldn't even considered business casual.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 10:12 PM
–

Every comment in that thread, summarized: "This would have been awesome if she was hot! She didn't do anything wrong, every little boy wants this. She only got this sentence because she's ugly." Gross.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 02:57 PM
0

Except I never said the equivalent of Eurasia. Ignore.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 05:47 PM
–

WTF are you talking about? I clearly said: "the girls in these schools don't resort to violence as often as boys do."
/r/MensRights31/05/10 04:29 PM
–

No, I don't, and I really don't see where you get this from. I'm saying that the still existing attitude towards female violence in DV is a problem, and that the assumption underlying this attitude ("women aren't violent") is shown to be wrong by stories like this. I'm getting it from your statements like this! Again, you're talking about female->male DV, but saying, "This article proves women are violent". What I'm saying is that this article proves girls in high school are violent, it does not…
/r/MensRights31/05/10 04:21 PM
2

I agree that it's not on the scale of female body issues, absolutely. I was merely pointing out that there is a valid discussion to be had on the subject, without bringing up the financial aspect. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 03:37 PM
–

Yes, women can be violent, and attention needs to be paid to female->male DV. But again, I find your logic here specious; you're pointing to violence in high schools (and the specifics listed in the article were female->female) and saying it carries over directly to DV incidents. It may or it may not, it would take long-term studies to find out if girls involved in this violence are continuing to be violent in their relationships later in life. I've never been involved in any sort of DV, but in …
/r/MensRights31/05/10 03:30 PM
1

I was being literal with your comment, because I wasn't sure in which way you were going. Frankly, I don't think it necessary to even bring financial status into the discussion, because men are made to feel insecure about their body image, and it's not being discussed.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 03:14 PM
–

But this isn't domestic violence, and arguing that because school violence is up in both genders across the board means that DV is suddenly committed equally by both genders is a straw-man. I mean, this is pretty clear: Last year, 154 violent incidents in schools involving girls aged 10 to 17 were reported to police, compared with just 89 five years ago. During the same period, the number of male attacks rose from 254 to 291. So female violence is on a sharper overall increase, but male violent …
/r/MensRights31/05/10 02:47 PM
1

The word beauty isn't mentioned at all in the article.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 02:38 PM
4

Maybe they have their hands full with with their own causes to take the case of people that blame them for all that's wrong with the world? Thank you. This reminds me of the "Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" tshirt incident. Was it unfair to men and largely ignored as a joke, while if the genders were reversed it would have been a huge public outcry? Yes, of course. Was it small potatoes compared to something like Sharia Law, women being raped in the Congo, etc.? Yes. Things need to be put …
/r/MensRights31/05/10 02:36 PM
-1

Except those "nurturing" guys cannot get dates. And you are partly to blame because you lied when you told them that "nurturing" was an appropriate way to accomplish his goals. You didn't tell him that 99% of women would put him firmly in the "friends" category... because you and feminism don't give a shit whether he can attract a mate or not. Oh please. You're pulling out an old canard here, that men who are even remotely sensitive or non-alpha cannot get a date. "Woe is me, I'm a nice guy and …
/r/MensRights31/05/10 02:26 PM
0

If that's the point you're trying to make, then link directly to the interview itself, and leave your thoughts in the comments. But linking to a downvoted reddit link that calls someone a manhater, which in turn links to a misogynist blog...that doesn't help at all, it makes it sound like we're complicit in hating women to advance our ideals. Edit: Surprise surprise, I'm being downvoted. Again.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 02:17 PM
–

Frankly, I disagree with many of the comments posted on this thread. Most of the feminists I know are good people who are not man-hating assholes. They want equal rights for women, clear reproductive rights, respect, fairness in the workplace, etc. They don't crack jokes about male rape, they don't discourage men from having full custody of their children, etc. And then there are a few who are the exact opposite. One I know has a t-shirt that says "Men have feelings, but, like, who cares?" and b…
/r/MensRights31/05/10 02:14 PM
–

No, it's not worth a read; linking to a woman-hating misogynist blog isn't helping either. ménage a trois (that’s French for “Oh shit, you mean I have to put up with TWO women in the house?”) Oh come ON. Are you guys all thick in the head? This doesn't help us. Don't post shit like this in here.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 01:55 PM
1

Yeah, I really don't see why he should be liable for the legal fees in this case; if the accuser lies to bring up false charges, they should be responsible for the monetary damage done to the accused. I feel so terrible for this man and his entire family. I cannot imagine the kind of stress that must bring about.
/r/MensRights30/05/10 04:45 PM
–

Article completely ignores that loads of men have body issues, that male anorexia & bulimia exist, etc. No, we're all just on-off switches, because we used to be hunter-gatherers, blah blah blah. Thanks, William Leith, for reducing us all to simpletons, and reducing all women to appearance-obsessed, temper-tantrum-throwing petulant children!
/r/MensRights28/05/10 03:44 PM
2

Downvoted, laughing at drunken sorority girls is not an MR issue.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 03:24 PM
1

They did implement that around the time when I was leaving.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 05:42 PM
1

Oh, there were massive flaws there, believe me. That's why I left. :) But yeah, they discriminated all the time, it was really a shitty place to work. At my current place, it's much more understanding.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 03:57 AM
1

Funny that you mention likelihood of getting cancer, there are jobs that won't hire smokers, for example, because of several reasons including higher cost of health insurance, more likely to be absent, higher rate of cancer, etc. Obviously you can't predict everything, and no one is saying, "We need you to outline every conceivable thing that could happen to you over the next year", but when someone remarks they aren't trying to start a family and then says exactly the opposite once hired, that …
/r/MensRights27/05/10 03:53 AM
2

Sexual fetishes are a weird thing. My guess is that he probably gets off on saying dirty things to the porn stars, talking to them in really misogynistic ways, etc. I'm also guessing he doesn't exhibit any of this behavior in his day-to-day life. Not that that excuses it, those are real people he's talking to, and they probably find it repulsive. Hell, maybe he even finds it repulsive, I don't know. Maybe that's his outlet because he doesn't know how to find an outlet for it in his relationship,…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 11:36 PM
3

The only thing I can contribute here... I share a name with a wealthy investment banker who lives in Chicago, and I happen to own the domain name for my name. About 2 years ago, he was featured on a TV program. And that's when the emails started. I get, on average, 1 email every 2 weeks containing pictures that range from risque to downright pornographic from women I've never met who think I'm a multimillionaire, trying to get money from me. A few have looked up the contact info on the domain (n…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 09:56 PM
3

Canada is the same way, I don't know how small businesses cope with that.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 09:30 PM
3

It was similar in mine, we had to put in a lot of specialized training, so when someone left before basically 18 months, they were a money loser. We had to work really hard to weed out the people who just wanted to stay at a place for a year and then job-hop.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 08:52 PM
3

Mandatory paid leave in the US doesn't exist, but I guess she figured she would get at least unpaid leave and could come back to her job. In a company with less than 2 dozen people, someone disappearing for 3 months is a huge deal. If any of us had even the slightest cold or cough, they'd tell us to go see a doctor, take vitamins, etc., because illness could majorly impact timelines. Either way, they weren't required to give even unpaid leave, so she just up & quit.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 08:49 PM
8

Yes, on both counts. It was very manipulative, particularly when during the third hire one of my bosses asked her (as she was recently married) if she was planning on being a mom, as he and his wife started having children within about 6 months after they were married; not a formal question, just making casual conversation. She was emphatic, no, she didn't want kids yet, not ready, etc. 3 months later, she was pregnant and skipping around the office, happy as could be. She walked around beaming,…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 08:05 PM
–

Sometimes it is their gender. At my last job, we had a string of women work for us who, after we trained them, became pregnant and left within 6-8 months so they could get ready to give birth and stay at home. After the third one, they decided they weren't hiring any more women for the role because it was too much of a time-waster to train people only to have them leave. Outside of the sales positions, there was not a single woman in the company.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 06:52 PM
–

Both genders can unfortunately use sex to their advantage in the workplace; it's not just women, I've known gay men to do the same with their bosses (who were in the closet 99% of the time). Similarly, both men and women have been in trouble for the "Sleep with me and I'll get you promoted" BS. It's only a privilege if the company is being run by people you can sexually manipulate, and you're attractive enough to do so. Admittedly, for an attractive woman entering a largely male-dominated busine…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 06:50 PM
4

You're correct, she actually said there was no equivalent to misogyny in women. In my haste to type it out, I said antonym, which is wrong. Thanks for the correction. :)
/r/MensRights26/05/10 06:36 PM
7

Funny story, I used the word once when talking to my ex (who has a masters in Womens Studies), and she didn't know what the word was. I even had a female professor in college (I took a WS class) who claimed there was no antonym in the English language for misogyny. So if even people in the WS field don't know the word, I'm not surprised Firefox's dictionary doesn't other. Honestly though, I find most browser dictionaries to be woefully inaccurate, or not have a good deal of the words I use, part…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 03:42 PM
1

I don't know if I'd day it's common at all, but I've definitely seen one or two rape apologists around here. There was an post in here linking to a youtube video the other day of a man saying that if a woman is out drinking with a guy and goes back to his hotel, she's going there for sex and whatever happens next, it's her fault for going. That's not true, we know it's not true, but some people upvoted it. (Oh, and in that case, it was a case of incest and the whole thing was null & void anyway.…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 03:34 PM
0

That part was gross, the author was just repackaging a Chris Rock joke (yes, a joke) into an article that made otherwise valid points. That portion should be removed. Surprise, surprise, I'm being downvoted. Guys, courts cannot mandate that someone keep fucking you after you get divorced. It's a joke, and quite funny when Chris Rock tells it, but it doesn't belong on a serious list.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 03:17 PM
–

One of the biggest problems I have with being a Mens Rights supporter is that there is always an uncomfortable, anti-woman, "every woman is a liar or a bitch" vibe that some people bring out. I've seen it in feminism circles as well, but obviously the former strikes more of a nerve because I'm a male and I see my fellow men do it and it gives me chills. I'm not here to badmouth women, I'm not here to figure out how I can force a girlfriend/wife to do something she doesn't want to do, I'm here be…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 02:51 PM
3

What bothers me is that she's so specific about income. Someone who could be a wonderful person who fits every other criteria would be ignored if they're not a mega-millionaire. Someone like Jonas Salk, arguably one of the most selfless contributors to modern society, would be cast aside like garbage to her. So she's completely & utterly shallow and it's acceptable. Ugh.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 12:33 AM
2

I thought I'd post this here, because it seems relevant. This is from her interview on Top Gear in the BBC. Geri Halliwell, of the spice girls, lists her perfect man's attributes: Love his mum, be trustworthy & kind, good-looking, funny, sexy, healthy, bigger bank balance than mine, virile, 28-38 years old, loyal, fit, lots of free time, and is respected in his own right. So even when a woman is a multi-millionaire, the man has to have more money. (Which means her perfect man has to be a rock st…
/r/MensRights26/05/10 12:05 AM
1

Yes indeed.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 10:56 PM
2

Someone is going through here and downvoting all of the comments that imply this is not a MR issue. It sounds like people are confusing MensRights for ShariaLaw or something.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 07:58 PM
1

Yes, 2nd to the last paragraph. :)
/r/MensRights25/05/10 02:45 PM
3

I had it out with my sister, lots of yelling & whatnot. Then I grabbed all my stuff and moved out. I sent her a bill for the damaged stuff that she needed to replace, she never did so or even apologized for it. We don't talk much these days, but there's a lot of other history before that incident.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 02:44 PM
4

"Sometimes he wasn't a willing participant, like, he'd try to stop me. But I'd just do it anyways." Just imagine the outrage that would be going on at a statement like that if the genders were reversed. Why is there no mention of rape in the article? Why are charges not being pressed against the girl? He has a 60 IQ, for fuck's sake, he's mentally handicapped and cannot give consent to that.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 03:05 AM
3

That if the relationship is not 100% "ordinary", it's the man's idea/fault, and he's using the woman to his advantage. For example: My ex is bisexual and enjoyed being with women. I also knew that we were both years away from marriage or anything of the sort and we were still attracted to other people. After a night of heavy flirting with a girl, she suggested we open up our relationship to other people, men and women. We discussed it thoroughly for a few weeks, came up with some ground rules, a…
/r/MensRights25/05/10 02:51 AM
3

You sound like a patient, understanding, and reasonable person to be around. All the best to you and yours. :)
/r/MensRights25/05/10 02:41 AM
3

The last portion of your post reminds me of a story. Many years ago, when I was just out of college and living at home for a few months, I was dating a girl who lived a few hours away from me, thanks to our differing choices in universities. I bought her tickets to see Margaret Cho for her birthday. The day of the show, we were at her place, 3 hours away. I had the night planned out to drive to my mom's house, pick up the tickets, and head right out to the show. When I arrived home, I found that…
/r/MensRights25/05/10 02:33 AM
2

Downvoted, this is not a MR issue at all. Mens rights are not about controlling your spouse or demanding that she do what you want. (Yes, I'm a guy.)
/r/MensRights24/05/10 08:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter