TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

someNOOB Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by someNOOB on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It is sexist, but I would argue that the thick skin should be the norm. The thin skinned offense taking is damaging psychologically, and often employed for power to shut down dissidents.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:35 PM
28

If you think the law is written to be vague, overreaching, and unenforceable, you're right. The vast majority of people of both sexes will not behave in the way that this law suggests should be expected. This is by design. With loads of people being guilty, this law will only be about who it will be applied to, who will be persecuted.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:30 PM
2

More likely is that it will "disproportionately" affect blackmen. The left is having a real hard time with the idea of due process lately.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 08:45 PM
9

Plaintiff, accuser, complainant. Those are words describing your position in a legal proceeding. Victim is a word to describe a person who has been victimized, and necessarily requires that someone has wronged them.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 08:06 PM
5

This article provides no info on the claim itself, and is basically useless.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 12:00 AM
1

Hysteria. People are being frightened by the media. Ask them what the chances are on any given night that they will go out and be abducted or murdered and they will give you some stupid high answer like 25%. People who think that have lost touch with reality in a way, and other than being credulous it's not their fault. The blame lies with the media and politicians who push that narrative for clicks and clout.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 07:32 AM
2

If this really happened, Hysteria. Also going to go out on a limb and say that not serving someone based on their sex is a crime in the UK.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 07:02 AM
5

Here is a breakdown for just violent crime. Stranger violence is under 50% for all violent crime. Somewhere around 40% https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv19.pdf For murder and rape they are even more personal, strangers accounting for about 25% of both. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vvcs9310.pdf Nothing I've said here isn't commonly understood by anyone who has a cursory understanding of crime stats.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 09:13 PM
9

Not only is it rare, but the majority of those crimes are not committed by strangers, but by people you know.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 07:16 PM
56

Negative effects disproportionate among men: Of course, men make terrible decisions about their health and lifestyle. Negative effects disproportionate among women: Clearly the patriarchy / society. Freely swap men/women with any other victimhood class and it's equivalent counterpart.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 04:16 AM
3

If half of this is true, your organization's goals are only as stated in so far as they help the leadership expand their power and reach. Whatever the organization used to be it is now a shell, a skinsuit being worn by those who now control it. You should contact everyone on this now publicized list with the information you have posted here, and either make an attempt to lead your own organization, or point the members to a different functioning one.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 10:56 PM
1

No no, it's a rental so she didn't recognize it. Of course it's fake. "Remember me, your husband of 5 years?"
/r/MensRights02/02/21 02:05 AM
2

Unless I'm misreading the situation it sounds like the other members of the committee you're concerned about share your doubts about this woman's proposals and attitude. To me it sounds like the appropriate thing to do is make a social appeal to the rest of the group to not tolerate her antics. I don't mean to necessarily make a bold face callout, but rather ask someone you know doesn't agree what their take on the situation is? "Hey Janet, am I missing something here? It sounds like this approa…
/r/MensRights01/02/21 03:17 AM
3

You've got it backwards. They want to make it about gender so they look for "problems". Looking for the places where there is "disparity" then citing that as a "problem". This is a process called problematizaion, and is a core tactic of the groups who wield these terms. Of course the disparities they choose are always leaning one way, and they ignore when it goes in the other direction, more female garbagemen and more male college applicants and graduates amirite? Similarly while I agree with yo…
/r/MensRights01/02/21 01:56 AM
25

The horror stories I've seen show that actually signing a marriage certificate is just a formality. You can be considered married for plenty of legal purposes just by having lived together long enough. A girlfriend who stays at your place often enough can be considered a tenant and gain the right to use the property and you lose the right to trespass her (her name needn't be on any paperwork).
/r/MensRights30/12/20 08:46 AM
3

or are you guys not homophobic and not those type of guys ? Unless you're asking this of basically every group or person you interact with (which would be absurd and I don't expect you to do). Then this is what I was referring to. Your entire OP asks "Am I right to feel this way" and then your only question or concern seems to be that we're homophobic. I think you've gotten the answer from a few people here, but it is "no, we aren't".
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:07 AM
8

I read your post and the comments here. I understand that you were / are bullied by men about being gay, and that men haven't defended you from this. What is not clear is why your original post assumes that this group/reddit is somehow anti-gay?
/r/MensRights04/12/20 08:53 PM
1

I may be misunderstanding, but is your concern / question about why "mens rights" groups don't seem to have any focus on "gay rights" ? If that is the case, you should know that mens rights groups have no issues with gay people, would welcome them, and there are gay MRAs. You seem to expect that because gay men are men, there should be a focus on issues affecting gay men. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to approach these problems for them angle that those issues are more related to the "gay" in …
/r/MensRights04/12/20 08:33 PM
3

When a system is flawed, prone to abuse, and those in charge do not wish to change it based on those concerns, an effective way of convincing them to is to make the abuse apparent.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 08:09 PM
4

I am behind the aspect of this that exposes the disparity. It helps to point out the hypocrisy in the responses and justifications for this vs the justification for pay. Also helps to highlight that people have some things easier and some things harder. I am not a fan of the overall message of this. "Men are expendable", men make these choices for themselves. This is again "sexism of the gaps". The "no one should ever die on the job" is absurd. It would be great, most people who do don't "deserv…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 04:20 AM
6

Demeaning? It's not exactly shaming (you did something wrong and you should feel bad), more a form of humiliation or degradation.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 03:47 AM
-5

The sad thing is that sub is overwhelmingly petty. Constantly praising acts that are well outside the scope of "reasonable response" to aggressors of various sorts.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 05:10 AM
1

Did this woman just straight up steal a Chappelle bit?
/r/MensRights09/06/20 12:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter