TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

somebodypurple Archive

View 0 posts and 303 comments by somebodypurple on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

i understand where you're coming from, but i'm not really optimistic about chivalry going away. it's a cultural universal, and aspects of it are biologically enforced. it might be altered in some ways, so that it's fairer, but it's not going away until we can fundamentally alter human nature. and i, personally, would not sign up to have my kids' genes altered. even if it were possible, it would never catch on in a big enough way for non-chivalry to be a cultural norm. just like vaccination, ther…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 11:51 PM
8

i agreed with everything you said, but especially that last paragraph. the only reason feminism has co-opted all the other isms is because it doesn't have enough oppression points anymore. they lose the moral high ground if they don't preface everything with "i support LGBTQ+ rights, minorities' rights, disability rights, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseam." men's rights is about men's rights. it's about solving the problems that men face. that helps gay men as well, but it doesn't specifically help gay …
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:47 AM
1

it's a fact that women are the majority of the electorate in the united states. the reason being that women are the slight majority of the population already, and WAY more men are legally disenfranchised due to being convicted of felonies. more than 90% of convicted felons are men, and convicted felons can't vote. here in the US we have quite a few convicted felons, so... yeah. look it up, it's not a matter of opinion
/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:44 AM
1

well, let me say one thing. we get this criticism a lot, that we're not specifically fighting for minority men. as a minority man, i don't give a fuck. this isn't a movement for black civil rights, it's not a movement for latino civil rights, etc. it's a movement for MEN. it doesn't matter that men from certain backgrounds have more problems than white men. we don't get special treatment just because we have other problems that don't stem from our maleness. we are dealing with problems that stem…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:05 AM
1

sounds like someone is trying to filter men's rights through the lens of social justice. your post is full of SJW reservations. there are different schools of thought on this, i'm sure, but my opinion is that nobody is going to listen to us until they've first realized that social justice is bullshit. i didn't start out as an MRA. i was a SJW believe it or not. first i realized that social justice was laughable bullshit, and then i realized what men's rights was. if someone had presented me with…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:22 AM
1

i don't think anyone ate anything in any of the star wars movies. eating is very rare in action movies. but yeah just a joke
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:33 AM
1

eminem really needs to DMCA laci. i can't even comprehend why she would use his music. the two are fucking diametrically opposed in terms of their mindsets, opinions, and personalities.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:32 AM
6

he wants to subject your child to something that he can't even take the time to watch?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 09:06 AM
5

wait, what? men's, dude. men is the plural of man. the singular possessive is man's. the plural possessive is men's. they are our rights, thus they are men's rights. like women's rights. mens is actually a word in and of itself completely unrelated to men. womens is not a word though, because it's a double plural. that's like saying sheeps, or cattles. we are talking about rights that belong to men, thus we use the possessive "men's."
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:52 AM
2

how do you even quantify oppression? this is the whole problem with feminism. it doesn't MATTER which one is more oppressed. why would it matter if the goal is to end oppression altogether? do we need to only deal with the #1 oppression? do we need to deal with the #1 oppression first? why can we not deal with both at the same time, regardless of unfalsifiable theories of which is oppressed "more"?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:45 AM
0

jesus christ man, are you trying to spoil everything for the rest of us? like it or not, some of us actually want rights, not an opportunity to rage at our philosophical opponents.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:43 AM
0

1) of course, you didn't watch the video. sam harris cites numerous studies and simple facts about what is written in the quran. his opinion is actually irrelevant. i sent you the video so you could see the facts he mentions, so that i wouldn't have to waste my time typing them all up for you. 2) good rebuttal, you really got me. i'd love to see you use those tactics in a public scholarly debate, i'm sure you'd get a lot of love. 3) never even posted on /r/atheism, so wouldn't know
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:20 PM
0

i like how you just downvote all of my posts, instead of having a legitimate discussion. like are you really so hostile that you want to affect my karma, instead of change my mind? you're quite a douche, really. show me documentation that al qaeda can't recruit grown men willing to blow themselves up. i don't doubt that they recruit as many people as they can, including children. but the main reason is because it's a lot easier to indoctrinate people when they are young. ISIS is absolutely a ter…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:10 AM
2

my first guess was that they would raise the women's price, to protect their profits. then i remembered that their primary target demographic is women. this gym is kind of like planet fitness. it works by sucking in out-of-shape women, giving them no incentive to use the gym, providing not enough space or equipment for all of their customers, but depending on the fact that most of their customers will rarely or never come in to work out. they can do this because the price is cheap enough that it…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:04 AM
1

yeah i know it's a different company, i said they printed it. they don't print it anymore for some reason but they're using a lot of the prints from ahfabrics, including loads of male prints. so the point still stands.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:57 PM
1

i wrote almost exactly the same argument a few months ago, before the UVa rape scandal. i got attacked by feminists for insinuating that being falsely accused of rape is worse than people not believing that you were raped. now that the UVa rape scandal has happened, every time i make the argument again, nobody challenges me. denying it now would make a feminist look like a fucking imbecile, a fucking asshole. the narrative of "listen and believe" was devised shortly before the UVa scandal. reall…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:50 PM
2

is it just me, or does that award seriously look like someone gaping a vagina?
/r/PussyPass15/04/15 01:32 PM
1

that's pretty normal. when i was in college it was like that at almost every single club i went to. they always wanted a higher female to male ratio in the club, so they'd encourage female patrons by giving them free entry, and discourage male patrons by requiring them to pay. it was pretty much the standard for 4 years straight, which comprises the entire period during which i was willing to attend 'clubs' in the first place. no idea if they are still doing this, but it hasn't been very long. i…
/r/PussyPass15/04/15 01:30 PM
1

i looked up a picture of her, and she looks like a fucking guido chimp. i mean seriously she looks like she belongs on jersey shore. i would definitely not jump on that candy. she would be more like black licorice.
/r/PussyPass15/04/15 01:03 PM
1

a guy can't handle himself. that's the whole problem dude. he can physically handle himself. but if you're not allowed to hit a girl, how can you defend yourself? how can you defend yourself when a woman threatens to call the police on you if you do anything? this is how most men are abused. not because they're mentally ill, or disabled, or somehow incapable of hitting back. it's because she manipulates them, through fear, into believing that fighting back will be worse for them than just taking…
/r/PussyPass15/04/15 01:00 PM
4

better idea is to take an agility potion 45 minutes prior, pray to the sun god, spray on some suntan lotion, and use a power rangers kick to the solar plexus. you could probably pull that off. it's always a good idea to strategize before you ruthlessly tear apart a woman's pussy pass, lest you be shut down by a sterling white stallion like our friend in the video.
/r/PussyPass15/04/15 12:55 PM
1

weird. so giving women the right to be prostitutes is somehow an attack on women's rights. the cognitive dissonance is extreme...
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:03 PM
2

i think men's rights is mainly huge because of feminism. just like anita sarkeesian's bullshit led people to gamergate when they probably never would have heard of it otherwise... and in fact, gamergate is one of the main reasons i think the MRM has blown up in the last year. it's become enormous really fast. on youtube you can get a raw picture of how many people agree with us versus how many people agree with feminists just by looking at the votes and comments on popular videos. it's not scien…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:51 AM
1

no they definitely do not ban people for inactivity. that would be moronic. the mod interface doesn't even have an easy method for banning people who haven't posted recently. besides, that would hurt their whole agenda. banning dissenters helps them. banning lurkers doesn't. of course it doesn't. they ban anyone who challenges any of the feminist sacred cows because they don't want to lose subs. waking up a feminist would hurt /r/feminism. so these dishonest fucks will ban anyone who disagrees, …
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:19 AM
6

look at the little words. "awarded." they don't say "fewer women try to get a bachelor's degree in computer science." they make it seem like it is a special prize, that is just given to men for free, because they are men, and free STEM degrees is a male privilege! "awarded." wow. this is probably not an intentional thing, but that says even more about whoever made this. if this is how they describe their facts, it says a lot about what they think. how they think about these sorts of things. it i…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:24 PM
0

that broke my heart
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:44 AM
3

1/8th of the prisoners in south carolina are there for not paying child support, and surprisingly most of these are black, despite black people being a minority in the general population. feminism hurts all men, but it has absolutely decimated black communities. it's a big reason why so many black men are in prison. if they don't pay their child support, they get tossed in jail. if they try to pay their child support by selling drugs, (because they can't afford it with a minimum wage job) they g…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:00 AM
2

if you look on their facebook, it does seem to be a primarily female gym. when i first saw their prices, i assumed they offered different services to males and females. after looking through their facebook photos it appears it's just a normal gym, but they are marketing themselves with some kind of female-pandering gimmick which i guess involves giving women special privileges. it's like a "girl's club." you know, no boys allowed. and the owner is a man, obviously. guess maybe he's just trying t…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:22 AM
2

the comments made me pretty upset. the longer i've been involved in the MRM, the less patience i've had for the comment sections on these kinds of articles. especially discussions about circumcision. it amazes me to see people defend male circumcision so feverishly. why do people feel so strongly about it if they have no problem with circumcision? it's almost like they need boys to be circumcised to validate their own decision to mutilate their children's genitals, or their parents' decision to …
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:07 AM
2

dude do not block her number, don't contact her but keep a record of everything that she sends you. and you need to put some serious thought into this, man. you don't just "get a DNA test." that's up to her, or a judge. you can't just say "i want a DNA test," and it happens. this is why MRAs are so fucking pissed in the first place! all i can say is look alive, man... this is no time for you to be taking a nap and assuming everything will just work out on its own. this is probably not your kid, …
/r/MensRights09/04/15 11:35 PM
1

"misconceptions" lol
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:41 AM
0

correction: it wouldn't make a lick of difference to you. of course it would make a difference. you've just already made up your mind, and now you're looking for arguments to support your predetermined opinion. and i'll disagree with your assessment until you actually provide some examples, lol. the IRA is not even close to comparable to ISIS, what a joke. the tamil tigers are a great example to prove my point, actually, thanks for bringing them up. fortunately i've done two and a half (lol) res…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:36 AM
0

ah gotcha, another person who hasn't read the quran, yet feels free to condescend to people who actually have. anyway to respond to your points, nobody is attacking islam. if you've read her book, i mean... even seen the title of the book... it's pretty clear she's not attacking islam. but this is the state of political correctness, and don't think just because you're an MRA that you're somehow immune. you took my mere approval of an author who wrote a book of constructive criticism as an "attac…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:20 PM
1

yeah i've certainly been a huge dick when playing competitive games before, but man... i've seen plenty of people go crazy like this but they're never this articulate. i've always just assumed they must be 13 year olds who aren't yet emotionally balanced, just testing boundaries and trying on different personalities and behaviors for size. when i see someone who acts like this, and is clearly not an adolescent, it just makes me wonder who he is in real life... what has happened to him? i don't k…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:32 PM
5

remember last week when those girls tortured a man by burning his genitals with a curling iron, and got zero years?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:33 PM
3

feminists hate her because she is willing to admit there is something specific about islam that allows groups like ISIS to become so immensely popular and attractive. there is just nothing comparable in any other religion, and it's pretty hilarious to see hardcore liberals scrambling to deny this incredibly obvious truth. she's speaking the truth, and it's funny because if she were a white man we would have never even heard the name "ayaan hirsi ali." but even though she's got her victim card, b…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:20 PM
1

what? since when am i a mod? edit: lol MODERATORS rMensRights MRmod3 AutoModerator AnnArchist EvilPundit AloysiusC typhonblue sillymod
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:42 PM
3

wow this crushed me. that movie was horrible, but i have loved some of his acting in other films. he was in the zodiac, which was a great movie, and an underrated one. but hey, anyone who lives off the hollywood milk for too long becomes a fucking arrogant prick, so not a huge surprise. just a bummer, thought he would have been a cool guy. that's almost like a cliché or an archetype at this point. the celebrity who seems really cool and you want to like them, and then they open their mouth and y…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:41 PM
3

i feel bad for red... you can't help but wonder what made him like this.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:35 PM
1

seriously man what the fuck do you do with your time, do you get off on calling people "stupid," "idiot," "retard"? go away bye bye now
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:53 PM
1

shame you? dude you're the one going around calling people "retard," get a life man, seriously. you're not even welcome here, nobody needs your shitty negative vibe
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:52 PM
1

That's a pleasant surprise. Haven't heard of one of those in a looong time. I wish I could give you gold, just for dedicating your time to one of the very few services that helps male victims. Mind me asking where you live? The last statistic I saw on this in the US claims that the US federal government funds over 2,000 women's only battered shelters, and 0 gender-neutral battered shelters. It sounded a little too extreme but that was exactly how it was worded on every website I could find; coul…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 05:47 PM
8

tub of lube is so not even close to a fucking medication that has a ton of negative side effects. viagra can seriously fuck you up. the fact that she wants to medicate him as if he has some kind of mental problem because he's not attracted to a fucking obese woman is just disturbing. she is such a fucking special snowflake she can't realize that NOBODY is attracted to her, he doesn't have a disorder that must be "treated," he's just not attracted to someone with very poor reproductive fitness. c…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:11 PM
5

the number depends on your country by the way. there are varying statistics that usually come from the US or the UK on this topic. anyway i think the primary reason most divorces are initiated by women has nothing to do with men's feelings for women, it's because men generally have a LOT more to lose from divorce than women do. divorced men are 12 times more likely to commit suicide than divorced women, as i'm sure most of us know. divorced men are MUCH more likely to lose custody and lose a LOT…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:04 PM
2

never seen such a fantastic argument against marriage in my life. thanks, lady!
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:52 PM
2

Actually libel literally comprises falsely accusing someone of a crime in the public sector. I mean that is literally what libel is. There are multiple forms of libel, and one of them is labeling someone a rapist, or a child abuser, or a harasser, or a stalker, etc. I think you could also justify a libel lawsuit if someone referred to you as a rape apologist, whatever the fuck that is, haha. Possibly even "racist" or "misogynist," in the times we're living... calling someone a bigot these days i…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:57 AM
1

Yeah I know what you mean, I'm not knocking you for posting it at all I just find it obnoxious how the news outlets are milking this one particular story as clickbait. It almost devalues it, by making it look like untrustworthy tabloid trash.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:53 AM
1

I don't even have a twitter account, there's nothing wrong with what I post on twitter lol. I don't keep up to date on the fucking block bot, so ya got me — looks like they defeated their grotesque censorship feature that they slipped past their consumers. So what? It doesn't change the fact. That's like saying a murderer stopped killing people, so he's not guilty anymore. I mean of course they didn't murder anyone, but what they did is still wrong, regardless of whether they stopped doing it. A…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:52 AM
1

when i see someone who constantly talks down to large groups of people for being "stupid," i know i'm observing a 14 year old kid, or a person who just really never grew up. nobody in the grown-up world talks about "idiots being so stupid" because they know that 50% of people are of above average intelligence, and 50% are not. it's just how "average" works. so if you're in that upper echelon of intelligence, the large groups of people you disagree with are not idiots, they're just average people…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:45 AM
1

do you just disagree with everything that gets posted for the sake of trying to appear smarter than everyone else? i mean seriously dude, if you are this smart, what do you have to show for it? who are you? what is your PhD for? show me an emblem of your massive intelligence, and then explain what i'm complaining about and how this title did the same thing, and then explain how this makes me stupid, yeah? usually the majority isn't wrong. it's how 78% of women decided they weren't feminists. the…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:39 AM
1

go back to posting future screenshots for /r/im14andthisisdeep in /r/nba, you're more useful when you post serious frowny face shit about the military industrial complex
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:31 AM
1

I don't really see what you're saying. What "problem" would there be? The whole reason I posted it is that it doesn't reflect reality; it's an ad hominem. There isn't a "problem," it's just bullshit. Nobody is saying "all bullshit should be censored!" It's just a post we can all laugh at, or be angry at, because it's so full of shit it's almost funny. That's the point. I don't really see what you're arguing with. What do you expect, for people to just not post funny bullshit that feminists do, s…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:29 AM
1

sadly, no... found it on a feminist's blog, followed by an angry tirade about how MRAs "never do anything for men." she might want to look up how her own feminist organizations stand in our way every time we try to "do something for men," perhaps just so they can later say "MRAs don't do anything for men." it's like constantly knocking over your teammate as soon as he gets to the hoop, and then complaining that he never scores any points. feminism is a nasty, insecure, 14-year old basketball pla…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:26 AM
1

Well personally being abused myself led me incredibly far away from feminism. In fact, being abused is how I first realized how much I hated feminism, and how much feminism hated me... and it's what led me to research anti-feminism in the first place. It showed me that, time and time again, real-life feminists and NAFALTS alike would erase me from the list of victims due to my gender, and try to silence me. Being abused as a woman might lead you to knock on feminism's door, but as a man, it led …
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:23 AM
1

I completely agree with you. Especially when it comes to men who have been raped or abused. It took me years before I could admit it to anyone, and when I get in arguments with feminists they always assume I know nothing about abuse... and I can't tell them that I've been abused, and that they are patronizing me when they've never been abused themselves like total pieces of shit, because I'm afraid they will tell other people I know. I only speak about it anonymously online pretty much... and to…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:21 AM
1

perfect TL;DR. should have given one myself, but you nailed it! exactly the point. remember i never claimed that this conclusion was proven, i said it was a logical conclusion based on what we know about navy SEAL claims. and it's also well-known in psychology that people will lie MUCH MORE when they know they can get away with it. They will lie about claims that can't be proven or disproven because they are not at risk of being caught. Before we make any sort of dangerous action, we do a cost/b…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:09 AM
1

yup that's right!
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:01 AM
1

Thanks a ton man! Sorry for the lack of caps. I have a bad habit of never writing in caps when I make spur-of-the-moment comment essays on reddit, facebook, etc. I write articles and material for my youtube channel all day long so I get sick of focusing so much on hitting the god damn shift key, which is so contrary to my lifelong habit, that I just indulge myself when I get on reddit. Then someone reminds me and I remember that long messages are a LOT easier to read when they're capitalized cor…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:01 AM
1

Right back at you.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:30 AM
2

haha yeah dude, i'm grossly misrepresenting. says the brand new feminist troll account, here to tell me how to advocate for men's rights. come back when you've actually contributed something other than accusations of misogyny. also, learn how to debate. if you're going to get in arguments with people, you'll have to learn how to make arguments. "haha lul wall of text ur a dork you typed a manifesto" is not an argument. neither is "omg you're a misogynist! you just secretly harbor hatred towards …
/r/MensRights30/03/15 01:18 PM
15

to summarize... considering how many people will falsely claim to be _____, even when their claims are easily verified/falsified, we should be overwhelmingly skeptical of claims that can't be verified. the fact that a claim can't be verified should make it much more likely to be false than a claim that is easily verifiable, such as being a navy SEAL. it stands to basic logic that someone claiming to be a rape victim, and providing no time window or identity of the rapist, is more likely lying th…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:49 PM
44

i wrote a really long essay about this once. i actually saved it and i will post it here for you guys to read. it's not about empathy, it's about moral authority. if i tell you i'm a child sexual abuse survivor, i now have moral authority and you're kind of in a bind when it comes to disagreeing with me on anything slightly related to sexual abuse. i actually am a child sexual abuse survivor, but i should not have some special authority on that just because i say so. you can't prove that i'm not…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:47 PM
1

she deleted a comment that only said "You're not that pretty" lol. just deleted it. forgot to delete the subsequent comments, where he repeated himself. bummer. now we stare into the true heart of feminism. what do they choose to censor? comments that tell them they aren't very attractive of course! on a serious note, she really isn't very attractive. she's like... average i guess. i'm sure she's totally convinced that she's oppressed and living a horrible life due to the "lack of self-control o…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:44 PM
1

yeah but having random women arrested? why do you need to teach them a lesson? i mean if this idea was limited to hardcore feminists in positions of authority at the university or something, sure... i guess... but this just brings us to the level of some of the lowest people on the fucking planet, false accusers.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:58 AM
1

yeah... well... yeah...... and for real this game was a pile of shit. loved bl2 and still play it all the time, but the pre sequel = garbage. and anthony burch's opinions = garbage
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:55 AM
3

even calling any society patriarchal ignores all of the nuance of the society. is it really male dominated? or are you only looking at the specific aspects that give that appearance? with respect to islam, i wouldn't call it a patriarchal society any more than any other society, and my reasoning for that has nothing to do with gender discrimination. patriarchal means male dominated, for the benefit of men at the expense of women. and certainly there are some ways in which men benefit at the expe…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:48 AM
2

I'm writing a book too! Wow it's great to see someone else is equally inspired! Well, the format of my book is going to be mostly non-fictional. It's going to contain the accounts of various individuals, their stories going through our gynocentric society, and how they have been fucked over in various ways, and completely and utterly ignored. So it's going to be pretty easy for me, as I'm just soliciting people to do most of the writing for me, and I will then compile all the stories together an…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:15 AM
13

getting pretty sick of these reposts. this is like the 7th time in the last 2 weeks this story has been posted, from various websites. not your fault or anything, i just find it amazing how the telegraph and the daily mail have REPEATEDLY posted the same articles about the same shit with just different wording. they were on this case as soon as it went public, sure. but they post these clickbait articles about this story every other day now, even though there have been no new developments. like …
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:57 AM
4

great article, comments section is fucking toxic though. gamerghazi seems to have found this one pretty quickly edit: also to anyone saying this isn't censorship, you are clearly misinformed. the point of block bot is not to block posts that you don't want to see. that's how they get you to download it. but what they are not telling you is that the code contains a script that automatically reports all of the people blocked. this is their way of basically report brigading gamergate, MRAs, anti-fe…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:40 AM
1

yuck, it's fucking grotesque to see people e-punishing each other for merely talking about something subjectively unrelated to the topic at hand. It equates to censorship, really. Whether posts are actually deleted, or people self-censor to avoid being "charged" with "derailing," it's got a silencing effect and I would love to see this concept scrubbed clean from ALL online discussions. Unless you are intentionally trolling by repeatedly spamming or posting ridiculous shit, nothing you say shoul…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:27 PM
2

I never said it was a non-issue. I said it's the least of our worries, here in the US where I live. It's also very difficult to convince anyone that this is actual discrimination against men, and feminists always retreat to the "nobody should be drafted regardless of gender so who cares." It's just pointless to talk about as an MRA because the inevitable response is "what do you care, there hasn't been a draft in 50 years." My comment was a much broader complaint, but with respect to the draft, …
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:19 PM
2

these lists are always bullshit merely intended to pander to popular things. will be forgotten about within days, if not hours. just trivial shit, clickbait really. men don't give a flying fuck about emma watson, most men don't give a shit about famous people altogether. men by and large care about people they KNOW, and as far as women go... the #1 Outstanding Woman to most men is whatever woman who commits to him and manages to overcome all the princess privileges that western women today are g…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:59 AM
1

feminists say "we fight for men's rights too." and what they mean by men's rights, men's issues, etc. is completely different from the men's issues we all know about. their idea of the problems men face are so incredibly vanilla it's disgusting. they are SO incredibly dissociated from reality that they think the worst men face in life is being called a pussy, or having to repress our emotions. they are so incredibly spoiled that they think all of our problems are mirror images of their own probl…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:52 AM
1

the fact that she would post this on facebook just makes it seem like she's taunting you. if she was really planning to fuck you like this, why reveal it to you? this just looks like mind games to me. if not, well, your daughter sounds like she'll be 18 soon, yeah? maybe this nightmare will end for you soon. wishing you the best...
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:43 AM
2

david futrelle is an obese white knight desperately trying to compensate for his own insecurities by pandering to women, via fearmongering. this is exactly how ozzy osborne and eminem were attacked. "but think of the children!!!! this kind of music will cause violence!!! therefore you yourself are guilty of violence!!!" any time you blame someone for inciting violence with their opinions, you out yourself as a repressive propagandist. david futrelle has long been known as one of these disgusting…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:39 AM
1

people who complain about "derailing" are always full of shit. and almost always feminists. actually, come to think of it, i've never seen anyone except feminists even use the word "derailing" except when talking about actual, physical trains. i recognize the word came from 4chan and other forums to discuss the form of trolling we all understand as intentionally posting off-topic material and images in a thread. back then it was describing something humorous. it seems everybody who used to use t…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:34 AM
3

the draft is an incredibly minor issue compared to all of the other ways in which men and boys are discriminated against. i don't even complain about the draft in my work, just because it seems very unlikely that a draft will ever be instated again. even if the MRM was completely wrong about mainstream feminism's position on the draft, that wouldn't exonerate feminism and it certainly wouldn't discount the vast importance of the MRM. also i love the comments where people say "I don't have a prob…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:27 AM
2

i don't have a lot of time to write a response, but i want to say that the longer you spend researching the biological roots of Asperger's the more you will realize that ASD is really just a spectrum of intensity of male psychological dimorphism. all autistic traits are really just extreme male traits. autism is genetically linked to mutations at the X chromosome. this is why 9 times as many males have ASD. having two X chromosomes means you have two alleles of every gene on the X chromosome, wh…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:41 AM
2

they're not wasting our time. they're using our time. taking advantage of our time. profiting from our time.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:10 AM
2

special women powers are many and varied. the most extreme are reporting you to the police for rape; telling all your friends that you raped her; accusing you of any crime really; giving birth to your child then alienating you from him/her while garnishing your wages, stealing your life savings and pension, etc. via child support; marrying you then divorcing you and stealing all your shit; getting a restraining order against you and then falsely claiming you violated your NCO by contacting her, …
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:54 AM
2

In-citing, or “Bibiograbbing”: A version of mansplaining that involves citing texts. One common variation is making a really obvious reference to a source that the person you’re talking to has probably read. For example: the day after a book about Emily Dickinson comes out and gets a front-page review in major papers, the bibliograbber jumps in to the comment section, informing the female reviewer that, hey, there’s a new book on the subject, has she heard about it? I knew these people hated sci…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:43 PM
1

mega old news
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:28 PM
2

I haven't really developed a fear of having sex, I've just stopped engaging in long-term relationships with women. I try to avoid getting emotionally close with the women I date, in case things go awry, she gets hurt and then flips out on me and uses her special woman powers to destroy my life. I know the odds are pretty low, as long as I don't get married or get anyone pregnant. But what's the point in taking even a low risk of such a horrible thing happening? I also realized that I don't reall…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:26 PM
1

you should really be using a VPN if you are going to be talking about any of this stuff online. i have no idea how your school's evidence gathering process works but it's very easy to obtain your IP and then find evidence to use against you online. if it enters the real justice system, well, as they say, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. for now i would just be careful and not give any specifics about your case unless you are on a VPN, with browser trackers dis…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:17 PM
2

i've seen these reports and articles regarding female murderers. consistently i see people claim that all of these women "were victims of abuse." they say it like that, "were" victims of abuse, unequivocally as if it has been proven. and when i look at these cases... i look up the actual women who have murdered their husbands. and i don't see any proof. they are not objectively victims of domestic violence. they are not victims. they are defendants. they are people who allege that they are victi…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:32 PM
1

i love how all the comments are criticizing him by saying "his whole argument was about his own anecdotal experience." yeah, sure. if you completely ignore the statistics he provided. he showed his own anecdotes to make the point of how crazy it is that we can believe so many women have been murdered or raped, when we don't even know anyone who's been murdered, and we know very few women who have been raped. he was making a rhetorical point intended to make you ask yourself the same question. AN…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:21 PM
3

i already responded to all the points you made, before you made them. feel how you want to feel, but don't get upset when content creators try to appeal to people other than you
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:06 PM
3

you don't exactly need to live in NYC. if we're calling it "support," we are referring to supporting someone's survival. of course the law is for supporting her lifestyle, but that's fucking egregious. any decent human being would say if you're not going to get a job, you should not expect to be paid to live in the most expensive way possible. if you want someone to support your survival, your survival should not cost so fucking much. she shouldn't be getting ANYTHING from him, but if she is, sh…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:02 PM
2

Inconsistencies in my Reddit post do not mean that Jessica Valenti isn't a serial killer By Reipa Paula Gist “No evidence” of a murder does not mean that a murder didn’t happen. But try telling that to any one of a number of media outlets who, when Jezebel released their findings on “Jessica Valenti” (the radical feminist moron whose alleged serial murders were at the center of a widely-disputed Reddit post) essentially indicated to their readers that she was completely innocent. But at a press …
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:42 PM
6

it's called diplomacy, when you are dealing with shit like this you want to reach the widest audience possible and do as little as possible to offend. you can make every point that PROVES she is a liar without using rhetoric to call her a liar. calling her a liar means nothing, it's just enjoyable for people like us who already know she is a liar and are angry about it. but it does absolutely nothing to convince feminists and people on the fence that there is a very serious rape hysteria right n…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:22 PM
2

well she sucked in almost exactly $1,000,000 from the women's lobby last campaign, which is the most of any US politician in office. so it's no surprise that she is the #1 biggest piece of shit in identity politics today
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:01 PM
1

what is that picture of the women evolving? i can't even see it
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:20 PM
1

he's married to some feminist moron from what i understand
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:29 AM
9

i said self-flagellation... but maybe i should have said "rivalry and competition with other 'men' as a group." part of the mythos that so many blue pill men operate under... that they are the One Good Man, surrounded by Men and the righteous, outspoken mavericks we call Women.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 05:17 PM
2

they love spending too much... but you're right, i just think if it collapses, it will not be because women suddenly became aware of how they're being ripped off. it will be because the tax system collapses. also you are so right, men pay over 70% of the taxes and reap very little of the benefits. not only are women paying less than 30% of the taxes, but they are also receiving more than 70% of the welfare benefits! so men are receiving 21% of what they spend, and women are receiving 179% of wha…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:56 PM
2

and they have feelings
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:50 PM
1

the only conscious aspect is how to do it. the desire to do so is subconscious. but it's not like we're incapable of bringing subconscious feelings and thoughts to the conscious level. i think all the cultural focus on that topic has caused many women to occasionally consider why they're doing it, whether they should do it, etc. and the result is they are consciously aware of why they do it at certain times and not at other times, as the rest of us are too. it's a subconscious thing, but we all …
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:44 PM
1

well i'm not saying that it would bother you to wear a skirt. if someone dared you to wear a skirt, who wouldn't? men aren't irrationally afraid of doing something like that. it's just a kind of joke, which shows that we are aware that it holds some importance. what i'm saying is that men don't elect to wear skirts just because. they don't just randomly wake up one morning and say "i'm gonna wear a skirt" unless they are gay or transexual. now like i said they are not irrationally afraid of inte…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:54 PM
1

ran out of space there but i'll continue. we are trying to artificially elevate our masculinity because we are very intelligent. we are creative and very adaptive, as humans. we are operating from an instinct, but it's a fundamental, abstract instinct. we have an instinct to differentiate ourselves from the gender we are attracted to. so even gay men will want to differentiate themselves from men. i've already explained why but let me explain how we do this. the instinct is simple - differentiat…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:17 PM
2

that's a big topic, and if i say one thing i'll have to say twenty other things to cover all the potential gaps in my argument. most people put a huge importance on the way their genders are perceived, because sexual attraction is rooted in gender. we treat men and women differently because of sexuality. and so a heterosexual man wants to be viewed as a man, because he wants women to be attracted to him. heterosexual women aren't attracted to women, they are attracted to men. so heterosexual men…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:52 AM
2

no, my personal jabs say more about you, because you're a fucking moron. child porn isn't legal in most developed countries, because it is CHILD PORN. what you've described is not child porn. you haven't even managed to explain what he actually did. you said he "basically had child porn." when you say something like that, it sounds like a tumblr SJW trying to describe something that ISN'T child porn. if by "child porn" you mean nudes that a 17 year old sent to him, then your third point means ja…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:06 AM
1

well you don't need to downvote me, dick. i was just asking a question, i went out of my way to do so gently, and i specifically stated i was not attacking you. also, it's spelled "you're." if you're going to go around calling people "idiot," maybe you should work on your spelling. makes you look like a know-it-all moron.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:20 AM
6

he wasn't conflating the two. he was referring to two separate things. how gay guys are treated like women's accessories, and how this specific feminist wants men/boys to behave like women/girls. two separate things. he just listed them in the same sentence. and honestly i don't really care how hollywood portrays anything, they have the right to produce whatever they want. but i do agree there is a colloquial stereotype about gay men, at least feminine gay men. when i watched that episode i didn…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:17 AM
3

you can't just look at the gender of elected officials and dictators and say that means they are the only ones with "political power." what is "political power?" it constitutes a lot of things. it constitutes bargaining power, which women have always had more of than men in general, due to people caring more about women's suffering. it constitutes actual votes, which men have always had more of. but it also constitutes voting power, which is split in an unquantifiable way between men and women. …
/r/MensRights22/03/15 08:13 AM
1

lol, let's call it NOM. national organization for men. NOM NOM NOM. anyway, i used to work as a freelance graphic designer and a writer/journalist. i have free time to contribute. i'm willing to work with you on this project if i have some stake in its financial output. if not, i will still be happy to contribute, but i will just have less time to put forth. an organization that actually does something other than just post articles and videos is absolutely what men need, especially here in the U…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:33 AM
0

i would normally agree with you, but he's right, you don't have a single post in here. if you know so well what battles MRAs should be fighting, why have you not made a single post before now in the virtual hub of MRA discussion? how can you possibly know "what's best for MRAs" if you're, well, not talking to MRAs? this is a serious question and i'm not trying to attack you. to some extent i agree with you, i think this is a rather trivial issue. i don't care what some company does, indeed it ma…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:17 AM
3

ahh yes, women are disproportionately affected. right. so while they're out gathering the water for their families, what are the men doing? being raped and slaughtered by boko haram? starving to death while the UN refuses to even let them join the line? working their fingers to the bone for a few cents an hour? sweating in the hot sun trying to farm bananas to make moonshine? i mean shit, women tend to do most of the cooking and grocery shopping. that does not mean food shortages disproportionat…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:07 AM
1

you should check out your website. i thought so too, but when i looked at their website i saw that they are absolutely not feminists. at least, they do not have any of the hallmarks of feminism. they do not mention gender at all, once on their website, as far as i can tell. but then, they are not offering shelters or "therapy for abusers," lol. so they're involved in a different business than the one i'm sure we were all thinking of.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:05 AM
1

if you go to their website, it's also completely gender neutral. in fact i went through most of the pages and i couldn't find the words "men" or "women" or "male" or "female" even once, on their entire site. i may have missed something. but it seems their organization is dedicated to healing families that have been disturbed by domestic violence, not imprisoning men and sheltering women. it's like a support group for families involved in domestic violence, from what i can tell. so it does not se…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:03 AM
1

dude are you aware that america is not the only place in the world? the age of consent is lower in most western countries. in some countries the age of consent is as low as 12. now i don't remember that article exactly but i'm pretty sure it was a very short anecdote with few details that did not even explain where it happened. some people might believe that 17 year olds should not be having sex. but in most countries 17 is above the age of consent. moreover, you did a good job mentioning how th…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 06:58 AM
1

link to the article you're talking about?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 06:32 AM
2

what the fuck is with the domestic violence quote at the end? what the hell does this have to do with "women who are victims of domestic violence?" this is a fucking infant who is the victim of a sick, depraved woman. how is this in any way related to female domestic violence victims? are we just going to include that little quote at the end of every article from now on? or just every article where a woman does something horrible, to divert attention away from a woman's victimizing behavior, and…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:34 AM
1

also manwomanmyth has some decent stuff but it's not so active
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:31 AM
2

in addition to the others posted, look up these guys: johntheother mike buchanan sandman (MGTOW) thunderf00t (atheism, gamergate with a tinge of anti-feminism) the amazing atheist (generally the same as thunderf00t) TL;DR also bane666au is WAY underrated. apart from karen straughan, who has basically stopped posting rhetorical content, he's got to be the best in terms of evidence and logic based argument. johntheother is also really good. i mean everyone that's been listed is great, but just got…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:31 AM
3

if anyone wants to get on the human trials, join the mailing list. the trials will be in the united states, starting in 2016 with a much larger trial in 2017. it very well might hit the market in 2018, but if you want it before then, try to get in on the trials. you can donate too, if you want to help get it to market ASAP. http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin/ea?v=001fIloikhUAkXqRBidoywEinNkuSasc-vpfBtO9_dTAH6BovGN8bq0meKe5Tmqb98eY8oZ-EwZKx0Q6FF4V_Fx9ama-T1GgKRyjYEFeAy0f_7upxAkhv…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 09:39 AM
1

at least they got one part right: Ms Mangan said misinformation, misunderstanding and dangerous perceptions were the main barriers to ending domestic violence. i think we'll have a fundamental disagreement, unfortunately, about who is spreading the misinformation and 'dangerous perceptions.'
/r/MensRights20/03/15 11:26 AM
1

ugly, fat, admits she doesn't know how to cook, and still demands to be "treated like a lady"? sounds like a horrible bargain... well shit, at least she admits her special privilege status
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:37 AM
1

yeah i remember people inciting guys to approach women only to be rejected as a form of entertainment. high school was a weird place. they'd pick the nerdiest, weirdest kids just short of being obviously handicapped, and then somehow trick them into asking out some pretty girl. sometimes it was because they thought it'd be cute, and they'd get him to bring her flowers and take a picture of her pretending to be his girlfriend, and it would make him super happy until she inevitably crushed his hea…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:57 AM
1

they love handing out taxpayer dollars to women. it's not about reimbursing the "state." the state doesn't own anything. their paychecks will be the same regardless of how much money they lose the state or municipal government. they're not handing out their own money, they're handing out the taxpayers' money. since so many of them today are social justice warriors, it's no surprise. perhaps they see it as a "redistribution of wealth." to enrich the females and impoverish the males, in return for…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:21 AM
1

yeah, and he nets a loss in the end. doesn't even matter if she has to give him back every penny, it will still probably equal less than his legal fees and retainer. when i saw that sentence about the prosecutor intentionally wasting his time, i thought this: she knew that the case was fucked, but she wanted to rack up enough time in court so that he'd end up paying more in legal fees than he got from the baby mama. so many female lawyers, especially CSS lawyers, just hate men and use their job …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:09 AM
1

despite the stereotype, small towns, especially midwestern towns or those in central california, tend to have police and judges with a bit more moral fiber than what you'd see in a big city. that's what i hear from my relatives who work in law enforcement and law, at least. i always see small town judges depicted in movies as corrupt fat fucks who run scams and prostitution rings with the police chief, but it's just not like that in reality. the cops are also much more laid back and considerate …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:04 AM
1

you may have been banned, but you haven't shown why. for all we know you got banned for posting dick pics. and frankly, the MRM has no reason to silence this question. the movement has been around in its current incarnation for less than a decade, and effectively just a few years. nobody would expect any other movement to have already opened up a bunch of shelters for men, especially when they're besieged by enemies in media, politics, and academia. we are not just silenced. we are actively shut…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:28 AM
1

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374102 http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/ http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/statement06.html enjoy your torn up penis if you want, i'll keep doing my best to make sure others don't end up like me due to the ignorance of their parents, or the "advocacy" of circumcised doctors with an insecure need to validate the abuse they suffered as a "lifestyle choice."
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:20 AM
1

CAFE identifies as egalitarian, but that amounts to basically men's rights advocacy. in today's society if you're actually looking for equality, you're probably going to be working on men's issues. the men's rights label might preclude the idea of women's advocacy, but in practice it has pretty much the same ideas as the egalitarian label. in my opinion that is
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:14 AM
1

it's obviously a case of a feminist faking a death threat from a man, and a gamergater/MRA type at that. it's basically a variant of false accusation. it's framing. it's either a female feminist trying to use anita sarkeesian's victim status to destroy a man, or a white knight defending the magnificent honor of anita sarkeesian's hoop earrings. it's a men's rights issue because the only reason we are seeing this shit is because of the immense growth of male hatred. and gamergate is just one big …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:02 AM
1

ahh, didn't i call it? the wall of text argument?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:23 PM
1

yeah when i see these things, i just think of how many other men accepted a plea bargain and went to jail, registered as sex offenders, and got out. and we have no idea that they were falsely accused, because they never even went to trial. the prosecution and police often work to intimidate men, especially young men, into accepting a bogus plea bargain and admitting to a crime they did. they say "you either take the deal and get 5 years, or plead not guilty and get 40 years" or some ridiculous n…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:23 PM
1

FARMVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT AAAAAAHAHAHA
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:02 PM
2

yeah it's hard to imagine a kid doing this. i've never seen anything like it before. either it's an exaggeration or the kid has serious problems. either way it's funny to see her give such self-righteous commands, repeating "do not ____" several times like she's fucking yahweh. the kid might very well have behaved inappropriately, but cashing on it as an opportunity to give commands to males and assert her sexual power and agency is kind of pathetic. by their playful tone of voice and general hu…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:00 PM
1

i never said i had evidence that she gave students different grades for the same answers because of their genders. did you still not read what i wrote? i said i doubted it was an intentional, overt gesture of discrimination, and that if it wasn't a completely innocuous, non-gender based action, it was a subconscious expression of her emotional feelings towards her male and female students. and i supported that possibility by describing the results of studies that measured how a teacher would gra…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:52 PM
1

yeah it's a very good point that i agree with, that women hide their motives and their power. not knocking them for this, it's just covert power. if people were aware of female power, they wouldn't be so trusting and that power would disappear. in the words of warren farrell, "man's greatest weakness is his facade of strength. woman's greatest strength is her facade of weakness." and yeah i agree with everything you said. i'd have more to add, but i just typed up a really long response to the ot…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:35 PM
0

that's what history proves? yeah... history is just full of anything but institutional religion, isn't it? how could history prove such a thing, when atheism didn't even exist for about 99% of known human history? now that atheism is consistently rising, a lot of the actual oppression that has gone on for hundreds of years is ending. if it weren't for institutional religion, "traditional religion" as you call it, saudi arabia wouldn't be beheading gay people for the mere crime of being gay. yeah…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:28 PM
1

anyway, i know exactly how you feel and i've been there. it's really painful to feel like an outcast. but know deep down inside that you're an agent of the truth, and everyone who fights for truth is destined to at least a time of pain, shame, and rejection. "in a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." and you will be put down as a revolutionary. you will be shamed, and ridiculed, and bullied, and rejected. it will go this way for quite a while, until the conformist…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:00 PM
1

so more and more i realized that my facebook posts weren't changing anyone's minds, and if i was gonna change minds it would be through one-on-one conversations. though i got my degrees in physics and biochemistry, i always was a political activist at heart. i needed to change people's minds. i felt like i needed to expose people to the lies and propaganda they've been fed. it's like i took the energy of a fervent conspiracy theorist and threw it into the issues that really bothered me. i decide…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:38 PM
2

i read this and it really reminded me of my social experiences over the last several years. i was raised a liberal, but nobody in my family made a big issue about feminism. nobody really cared about it. but i was taught to be a feminist in school, on a very fundamental level, and this is how i saw things until i went off to college. i went to UCSC, one of the most hardcore liberal campuses in the country, and definitely among the most feminist, most LGBT-friendly, and most obsessively anti-racis…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:13 PM
1

"I can't believe someone would..." let me stop you there. this does not surprise me at all.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:10 AM
1

just respond with "but that's not feminism, that's egalitarianism." if you refuse to let them patronize you with the "dictionary definition" claims, the argument will become about the actual, real actions of mainstream feminism. don't let them turn the argument into a conversation about men and women as people, or as personalities. don't let them make it about who men and women are, or what men and women tend to do. the only way anything you say will actually appear misogynistic is if you start …
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:04 AM
1

anyway responding to what you actually said. you sound like a lunatic. traditional religion is the only way to survive and thrive? yeah, you just threw your cards on the table right there. now this all makes sense in context. you feel that alpha males are conspiring to ruin society? you sound like one of those people who babbles about the rapture. the only people who conspire to destroy society are religious people, who believe that once society is destroyed they will go to heaven. terrorists wa…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:16 AM
3

1) muslim women don't wear any clothes during sex. they don't even have to wear the hijab at home. the purpose of the hijab is to wear outside of the house, and before marriage. muslim marriages involve the groom getting to remove the hijab for the first time after matrimony. eerily similar to the western ritual of removing the bride's veil. i would not be surprised if it has the same conceptual roots. 2) i strayed into feminism? no i didn't. i tried to compromise my arguments so that they would…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:55 AM
1

yeah i figured you didn't read what i wrote. i saw such a small response, and already i could tell, and then you respond "you have literally no evidence," when i mentioned multiple studies in my comment. i guess it's just too big of a wall of text. maybe just ctrl + F my message and search "study" or "studies"
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:55 AM
0

then we have no reason to believe blacks get higher sentences because they're black. it's not like someone has to jump out and say "i'm discriminating against you" for there to be tangible discrimination. besides, discrimination is subtle and often subconscious. she probably had no idea she was giving inconsistent answers. if she graded his first, she probably graded hers later and didn't notice the same abbreviations because of the inherent bias that most female teachers have for female student…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 07:52 AM
2

that, my friends, is why you push the thighs back... this happened to me once in college, but it was not intentional (i think). i think she just wrapped her legs at the same time by coincidence. fortunately i was strong enough to resist that and lifted myself up and out of there lol. but since it almost... "traumatized" me, i developed a habit of pushing my ex's thighs down just in case, even though she assured me she would take a plan B or get an abortion if something wrong happened. i could te…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:52 PM
1

oh gotcha. i tend to assume most people posting on here are men, my bad.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:34 PM
1

yeah i agree that it's sexist. he generalized. obviously no argument that "all _ are __" can be reasonably sustained. it's never true. all [group] are not [adjective], ever, when talking about personality traits or opinions or whatever. i think the second comment was just pointing out the hypocrisy of feminists who generalize men, then say MRAs are wrong because they generalize women. the first one seems like he should have referred to some women, or whatever modifier/disclaimer is necessary for…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:33 PM
2

odd, i could have sworn hurting children was primarily the province of mentally ill women. but yeah, like brokedown says, when your whole narrative comes from fantasies that "make sense," you can say just about anything and nobody will catch you, because they're all thinking the same narrative too. i can't say i don't ever "punch," but i don't drink, i don't hurt children, i certainly don't rape... i have served in the military but technically that wasn't a war. well, war was never declared by c…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:21 PM
3

noaptebuna is not even a girl... what are you, a fucking angry grandpa? is this how you introduce yourself to people? car champ... jesus, it's very rare i get in arguments with anyone but a feminist. i guess now i know what they're talking about when they mention douchebags from our neck of the woods. you're a rare breed i guess. you belong on a PUA forum though, not here.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:15 PM
1

which of them were sexist? show me.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:13 PM
0

hahaha dude you are such a sad sack of shit. i don't normally just shit all over people but look at you!!! "i don't care what ANYONE thinks of me, i'm on the INTERNET!!!" yeah, you're a fucking liar who steals valor and claims he served his country so he can win an argument on the internet when he's already lost due to his own stupidity. you fucking failed the argument, so you resorted to pretending to be a soldier. you're the lowest of the low. you're fucking pathetic. i won't shed a tear when …
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:12 PM
2

you're a fucking moron. i don't even know who janet bloomfield is first of all. i'm "tripping all over myself" to get you to stop humiliating this subreddit, and producing quotes that can be taken out of context and plopped into a huffpo article about how evil and misogynistic we are, so anyone who might have otherwise joined our movement and supported us in our fight will just think we're a bunch of angsty teenagers. i write a lot about white knightery... one thing i don't do is call anyone who…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:06 PM
3

yeah, people who employ the "Great Wall of Text" argument usually don't have an argument anyway. the laws are the way they are because men want pussy, and women want them that way. social dynamics are very complex. you can't condense them down to "women are bad." and it doesn't matter even if women are bad, because saying someone is bad does not make the problem go away. black people commit 54% of murders in the US. so do we just throw up our hands and say "black people suck?" or do we try to el…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:01 PM
1

upvoted comments? almost everything the OP said was downvoted, you moron. not that downvotes are evidence for anything, since they can easily be manipulated. i can make several accounts right now and change all the votes in this tiny little thread. it means nothing, and your "evidence" will not convince anyone who didn't already believe that men advocating for their own rights actually just hate women and are insecure about their tiny dicks. anyway, since you argue that the burden of proof is so…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:55 PM
2

i'm an MRA and i strongly disagree with OP... this does not represent /r/mensrights at all. notice the votes on the article itself.. and everything OP has said
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:38 PM
1

and you don't have a shred of evidence that the upvotes are legit. so why bother arguing? burden of evidence can't go either way. saying "/r/mensrights is sexist" versus "/r/mensrights is not sexist" could go either way. honestly, the burden of proof goes on the affirmative in philosophy. since we're saying /r/mensrights is not sexist, that puts us in the negative, not the affirmative. hitchens' razor, bub. yours is the claim: /r/mensrights is sexist. ours is not a counter claim, but a refutatio…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:36 PM
2

how do you "live off of divorce" without child support? karen has specifically stated she does not receive any child support. and if a woman wants to live off a man, fine with me, as long as she doesn't fuck him over in one of the many ways we know so well. in an ideal legal system, men and women could make whatever choices they want in a relationship without fear of a "contract breach" wherein the woman still receives financial support, but stops contributing companionship/sex/chores/child-rear…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:25 PM
2

are you pathologically stupid? you literally just proved the point. the law enables abuse. "every separated/divorced mother in the western world has had the option of shared parenting." key word, option. men don't have that option. the law enables abuse exactly by giving women the option to completely fuck over the man. it doesn't matter how decent she is. it doesn't matter how evil she is. what matters is that the legal system gives her weapons in her vendetta against her ex. it's a weapon that…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:24 PM
2

you seem pretty angry dude. none of what she said had anything to do with "marrying the right girl." did you even read it, or are you just looking to bash some females, even if they spend their time advocating for your rights? seriously... this is the kind of shit that people look for when they quote mine our subreddits for their hit pieces against us. you want to actually help the movement, stop lining up with the PUAs and TRPers to embarrass and demonize us. it only prolongs this hell that we …
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:05 PM
0

so you just suddenly completely reverse your opinion, and act like i'm the one who's been confused all along? it's a good thing nobody is watching this thread anymore. what sad humiliation... you literally said that the draft does not take disabled people. you took issue with someone saying that a disabled man would get drafted before the strongest woman, even though this is obviously true. after i proved that this was true, you give an extremely confusing response agreeing with me, and acting l…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:14 AM
2

Has a change.org petition to any government ever worked? Hope this raises awareness though
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:09 AM
5

you're an idiot. if i went to the police and accused you of murder, they still wouldn't arrest you until they had evidence. police's hands are tied until they find some significant evidence that you've committed a crime. a report doesn't count. showing them a message with your name on it doesn't count. it's not reasonable suspicion, it's unreasonable suspicion. especially considering how easy it is for police to get the IP credentials of virtually anything on a social media website, they could h…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:01 AM
4

ahh yes, the white knight says the woman is the victim. that she needs help. that she is the one who's suffered, as a result of her own actions. imagine that. if this was a man, nobody would be defending him, and they'd be right not to. yet because it's a woman, we have to think of her actions as a "cry for help." she wasn't really trying to hurt anyone, see, she was just trying to get help! even though people would jump at the opportunity to help a suffering woman, and she certainly didn't need…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:56 AM
3

cringed so hard when the text came up on the screen. basically "him vs. her, who do you care more about?" and really, all this dramatization of date rape drugs is getting ridiculous. there have been less than 10 cases of people spiking women's drinks with powder/pills to rape them. it's EXTREMELY rare. studies show almost every case where a woman has been raped at a party or after drinking at a bar, it's due to excessive alcohol consumption. THE most common date rape drug, by orders of magnitude…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:40 AM
1

well reporting it to the ACLU might not even be the best move, since it's not really illegal or something that can be litigated over necessarily. i mean, i don't know how canada's version of title IX works, but here you'd have to prove it's very egregious for it to be considered discriminatory against men. it's quite easy if your complaint is centered around women, but i can't think of a single time a title IX complaint about male discrimination has been even made, let alone considered. but it i…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:32 AM
2

if the definition of oppression keeps traveling down this trajectory, pretty soon we will be referring to wealthy children as oppressed by their parents' spoiling them...
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:16 AM
2

wow, there are no names that people call men in order to shut them down, shame them, or insult them? really? or are all these names insults intended to make them feel like women? hahaha... never forget that "pussy" comes from pusillanimous, not the colloquial term for vagina. men have been called pussy for a very, very long time. the funniest part is that, while complaining that there are so many gendered insults for women, feminists are the single group actually creating the most new gendered i…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:33 PM
2

exactly, that's how you know it's about money. it's not some hormonal, emotional urge to have a baby that women just can't control. it's the logical, cold, calculating urge to trap a man. maybe it is hormonal, maybe it's an evolutionary adaptation, but so fucking what? men have an evolutionary, hormonal, sexual urge to fuck women, that is not an excuse for coercing unwilling women into sex. when some men choose to rape women, out of their own hormonal urges, they go to jail. it is illegal. yet w…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:20 PM
2

the majority of the people in the comments of that video strongly disagreed with what you said... honestly, i would assume that anyone in the comments on youtube taking that perspective either didn't watch the video or already hate the youtuber. i don't watch his channel but it's quite clear he already has a lot of established haters.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:07 PM
3

hahaha okay mr. tough guy who hasn't seen the military draft anyone in wheelchairs
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:05 PM
1

you're a moron. first off, i receive a disability pension from the military, and i have had the disability since i was 13 years old. second, "disability" does not mean "paralysis." the military drafted people with down syndrome you fucking moron. down syndrome. do you get it? down syndrome is quite a bit more debilitating than paralysis in the modern economy. third, your sarcasm doesn't even make sense. you don't see the military drafting anybody, because the military hasn't drafted anybody sinc…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:03 PM
7

so you just read the comments instead of watching the video, then you felt entitled to provide a tl;dr for the people who aren't going to watch the video? are you fucking stupid? maybe tl;dr should be decided by people who actually watched the video. and since you didn't watch it, maybe you should be the one reading the tl;dr
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:52 PM
6

he didn't fuck anyone... he had a consensual conversation with a 15 year old. also need to keep in mind that girls hit puberty about 3 years before boys do. so technically a 15 year old girl and an 18 year old boy are approximately developmentally equal. but it wasn't sex in the first place. an 18 year old attracted to a 15 year old is not pedophilia. pedophilia is being attracted to prepubescence. that is, being attracted to girls or boys who are not developed. the age gap makes a huge differen…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:47 PM
3

this is so typical... i've been hearing more and more about this from karen straughan. apparently it is common practice for mothers in the regions affected by boko haram to dress up their male children as girls. but boko haram often comes through, demands that everybody undress to reveal the genitals, and takes all the male children away to be raped and slaughtered, sold into slavery, or used as child soldiers. first world feminism vs. whole world male disposability
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:40 AM
2

why would you downvote me lol. i already said that he should report the teacher's behavior to the ACLU, do you honestly think i approve of this? i told him that it's obvious gender discrimination and a serious problem, but it's just one class and he shouldn't feel like a failure because of it. i learned programming all on my own when my school's comp sci class was full up and i'm fine now. really kind of ridiculous to assert that i'm confused by gender discrimination, i volunteer for AVfM to wri…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:50 AM
4

at least in the US, it probably has a lot to do with the fact that more than 25% of our boys are put on behavioral medication like ritalin or adderall by the time they reach high school...
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:44 AM
1

well the selective service system is really the selective service agency. all agencies are created by an act of congress, and they can be deleted by an act of congress. it would be a lot harder to bring the draft back without an act of congress. see what i'm saying? if the selective service agency no longer existed it would be a lot harder to draft anyone, which is ideal. if the selective service agency continues to exist it will be very easy for another draft to be instituted. in fact there is …
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:42 AM
1

well are you 18-26? :P
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:33 AM
2

exactly. if the draft has been abandoned, then "the draft has been abandoned" is an argument to eliminate selective service or put women on the fucking list. it's so obviously logically hollow. it's just a bullshit excuse. the fact of the matter is that if women were conscripted, they would get killed. most women are not willing to get killed. hence, men protect them. that's really the defense. that is why women are not conscripted. not because the draft is "over." if the draft was really over, …
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:28 AM
2

well do you just call yourself a feminist or do you really mean gender egalitarian? kinda sick of that word being passed around like it can mean MRA. also good on you for serving, and that's funny that you were pissed. i didn't even find out i had to sign up until after i enlisted LOL
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:21 AM
3

the disabled are drafted. the only way a disabled man has a hard time joining the military is if he tries to volunteer. then he might not make it through a physical or basic training. but during wartime they take virtually everybody. in vietnam they took men with down syndrome. case closed.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:18 AM
3

wow that's insane. only forcing women to work counts as forced labor. that is fucking absurd.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:17 AM
4

yeah you can lose your right to bear arms in some states as well. some police departments will literally query the database, see you didn't sign up, and then come and steal all your guns and sell them. fucked up...
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:14 AM
1

true but in the history of the US there's been little difference between draft/conscription. the reason i say that is because the end result is almost exactly the same. they chose draft over conscription because people of the time considered conscription to be a violation of human rights and constitutional rights. but the government was assisted by other organizations in recruitment of the leftovers... talking about things like the white feather movement and it had quite a few counterparts of th…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:11 AM
3

well the difference would be more meaningful if israel, for example, didn't force women and men alike to join the military. as it stands the US doesn't force people to join the military unless it really needs to, but it makes it a very serious crime to not make yourself vulnerable to being forced to join the military with very little warning as to when it might happen. i mean... it is discrimination against men. that's all that really matters.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:05 AM
5

the other teacher must be a feminist, trying to compensate for some perceived advantage that men have by giving them a huge disadvantage right off the bat. that's okay... teach yourself programming man. that's what i did, there are a lot of resources online for you that might be even more useful than a teacher.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:58 AM
0

also oh my god someone in the comments recommended that people view nancy pelosi as a role model. holy mother of god.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:00 PM
1

repost this. don't let them silence this hypocrisy. repost this shit on the comments.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:57 PM
3

"rather hard to do analysis when you're talking about individuals." right... this forum conversation between a bunch of grumpy, middle-aged man-haters totally constitutes analysis. generalize all you want about men, that's fine. i won't have to point out how ironic it is to claim that men have a natural drive to silence women when you're a feminist either. i'll just generalize about women. leave it to women to get together in little groups, present evidence, play judge and jury, and sentence wom…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:42 PM
0

oh yeah rad fems are so tough and powerful. kill me ladies. kill us all. i can't wait for the final battle. let them march at the gates of mordor. the great eye of the patriarchy will boil them alive with a heat ray, no joke. the sheer masculinity on this side of the fence is too much for you to even mentally cope with. your heads would explode before you even managed to look at us. LOOK AT US!!! we are man ape warlords!!!
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:29 PM
2

women abuse disproportionately... they abuse more than men, even controlling for the extra time they spend with children. it amazes me that i never knew this until i got involved in the MRM... yet another truth that is willfully locked away in the bowels of the man hatred movement
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:53 PM
1

sex offender registration. mandatory in most jurisdictions. the end.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:47 PM
1

smart move, i keep doing the same thing over and over. i have a compulsion to tell my own personal stories and then i end up feeling at risk
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:37 AM
1

well you're a 2 week old account who almost exclusively posts nasty feminist sneering on men's rights subs just to get downvoted. you can't really expect me to view your single comment here outside of the wider context of your overall bullshit. you clearly do not have thinly veiled misandry... it's just an incredible oversensitivity to anything that generalizes women, and a sincere belief that this only or mostly happens to women. which is basically misandry, and you express this in most of your…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:12 AM
1

lol oh, it's women who aren't treated like human beings. man, the lack of self-awareness is stunning. you aren't even a woman, are you? edit: and yes, i'm sure men are so grateful for your help in calling them sexists. this really helps our movement, micromanagement from feminists who consider every joke a dehumanizing microaggression that denies women humanity itself. my god. what is humanity? is humanity something that can be denied? is humanity being dragged through court to pay for a child b…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:58 AM
1

i see a lot of people claiming that most welfare recipients are only in it to help themselves from a recent financial meltdown, and will be back on their feet soon. this is just presumed because people don't want to say bad things about government entitlement programs. they never provide any statistics that actually show this is true, they just say it as if it's probably true. like "well from what i understand most people who start small businesses end up failing." where's the statistic? or is t…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:55 AM
1

thanks for reading, i'm glad somebody got something out of it. took a lot of time to write, i half expected nobody would notice it or take the time to read it. i just read it over, and in retrospect i wish i had said a bit about male disposability, and beta-males' reaction to this standard of masculinity. i also wish i had said something about wiki editors' overall desire to keep the wiki pages from saying anything non-status quo, and thus damaging wikipedia's credibility and reputation in the m…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:40 AM
1

"instead of ever helping men." whoa, "making things up," are we now? you could have said "brag about your internet points instead of helping men," describing this singular moment in time. but you decided to up the ante to an incredibly broad assumption about my entire life. i have never helped men? what could that possibly mean? is getting into a petty argument with you on the internet a signal that i have never so much as helped myself, a man? that i've never helped anybody who happens to have …
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:56 PM
1

and what qualifies you to state what we 'know' and don't 'know'? i already know where this conversation is ending, so maybe i shouldn't even bother. you are wrong already, and it's interesting to see that you responded to this post denying that any research has been done on the biochemical causes of transsexuality, and then saw that i proved your claim wrong and called me a cissexist. funny. you are already operating from a position of willful ignorance, denial, and deceit. that is, you are thro…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:50 PM
1

right, i'm sure you can teach me all about transphobia. rationalizing my hatred of transgender people? or perhaps you are seeing transphobia in everything, paranoid and desperate to believe that you are the victim of some terrible popular crime? being transgender is not a problem for me, it literally has no effect on my life. doesn't mean you need to shove "transsexuality is natural" down the throats of an entire society that might otherwise seek genetic or hormonal cures to an extremely common …
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:29 PM
1

personality is a spectrum, not gender. the conversation is not even about how many people have gender dysphoria. who cares how many people have it? nobody should have to go through that, and it's not going to go away no matter how PC our culture becomes. endocrine disruptors need to be removed from our diets, for more reasons than just preventing gender dysphoria and sex reassignment surgery. if we accept transsexuality as "normal" we are indirectly implying that it's not a problem. it's almost …
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:26 PM
2

there is really strong evidence that endocrine disruptors cause a wide array of alterations to sexual brain development, actually. it's definitely not a circumstantial case, at least where i work. there is an overall agreement here that mothers need to take very specific vitamins to counteract the endocrine disruptors in their blood, or their children will end up hermaphrodites at worse, maybe mentally retarded, or transsexual. there is a study showing a correlation between transsexuality (regar…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:05 PM
1

it's pretty much a fact. master's degree in biochemistry, focus on neurochemistry, work for a pharma lab that mass produces neurohormone vitamins. endocrine disruptors have different effects depending on when you are exposed to them. they are foreign chemicals that substitute for estrogen or progesterone at estrogen or testosterone receptors, but which have different effects on transcription factors. the effects are different even when comparing a 5-week-old fetus to a 10-week-old fetus. but a y…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:52 PM
2

more sophistry from a white knight... i wonder, do you think he also whips himself at the ritual pussy altar?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:17 PM
1

people almost worship the idea that both genders are equally intelligent. they just take for granted that all people are equal, which is obviously an unsustainable argument in the face of evidence. it's kind of insane to watch them dodging around evidence to deny the offensive reality. this is something that seems to be true of all feminists. they are so offended by reality, by the objective truth, that they suppress the truth. but more than that, they seek to demonize people who speak the truth…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:31 AM
1

what sexist joke did i make? also, maybe i don't belong here? you created this account literally entirely to post bullshit on men's rights subreddits. ALL of your posts are devoted to talking shit on men's rights and red pill subs. how many times have you been banned from /r/mensrights? purple pill? maybe i don't belong in the subreddit that's given me gold and thousands of times more karma than you? it's funny you didn't answer my question. what does misogyny mean? just answer it. what do you t…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:37 AM
2

further clear evidence that feminism is a religion
/r/MensRights02/03/15 06:58 AM
1

in feminist literature, real men don't really rape. it's just a fictional account of fictional people, intended to change people's interpretation of real events.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 06:28 AM
1

"sexist joke against women" see what you did there? this is your ideology afflicting your perception of reality. it's not a joke about women and men, it's not even a joke about women, it's a joke against women. it's a joke intended to oppress women. a joke intended to degrade women. a joke intended to deconstruct the value of female psychology. it just amazes me that you can call a mundane, innocuous joke about feminists a "sexist" opinion, yet fail to even acknowledge the immense misandry prese…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 06:25 AM
1

you gotta stop thinking in terms of what would happen if we suddenly removed [government component]. the world doesn't work like that. there isn't one day where the government suddenly goes small. it's not a productive thought experiment to even waste your time thinking like that. shutting off the welfare faucet will cause problems for some people, and then those people will be a lot better off. you know how i know that? i spent a year homeless and 3 years on major welfare. i was a heroin addict…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:56 AM
2

oh spare me... you'd say the same shit generalizing about men and nobody would call you on it. generalizing isn't illegal. sometimes people don't have time to preface their shit with "i don't mean all [blank], but..." and that doesn't mean they literally think all [blank] are [blank]. just grow up. you're looking for misogyny so you can knock it down and feel good about yourself. you're finding misogyny where none exists, and producing no valuable discourse in the process.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:43 AM
1

it's more or less just a heavily biased response to feminists not caring about my victimization, and the lack of sympathy for male victims at large. if they don't give a shit about us, and we can't make them care, then fuck it. i don't care anymore. it's the same basic concept as MGTOW. fine, if you're not going to get rid of the gun in the room and make things fair, then i'm gonna boycott you. just like MGTOWs boycott women, i'm boycotting female rape victims. if enough people stop dating women…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:40 AM
1

hahahaha
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:37 AM
1

i know exactly how you feel. i was in exactly the same situation and i still deny it, except for talking to a few friends about the most egregious feminist violations of the constitution and so on. btw sounds like you're in toronto lol. i'm in california and it's just as bad here... people are just in collective public denial of obvious truth for the sake of not offending anyone. the reality has been deemed offensive here.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:25 AM
1

and how is oligarchy a result of libertarianism? i'm socially left but when you started talking about big government a fuse blew in my head. oligarchy is not caused by the free market. oligarchy is caused by big corporations wriggling their tentacles into government, which can stamp out competition using regulations and selectively denying tax cuts. oligarchy in america is literally a consequence of government regulation. if people just voted with their wallets we could get by without a governme…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:47 PM
1

what are you basing this on? in most cases the father isn't informed of the pregnancy? where's your statistic? i have never heard this claim before. if it's true, there ought to be some proof for it. i don't think there's anything wrong with baby boxes. i just think men should be able to give up their paternity without the mother's agreement. it's fundamentally wrong that men should be forced to subsidize a child they don't get to raise or even see. when women pay for children, they get somethin…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:37 PM
2

9-day-old account, why am i not surprised?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:11 PM
1

good on you for bringing up this issue in your personal, academic life, where espousing it puts you at great personal risk. you are very brave, and we need more people like you who are willing to lead the way for men who are afraid to speak up about these issues. we all feel comfortable talking about it anonymously over the internet... but not many men are willing to invite the claims of misogyny and traditional, old-fashioned thinking against themselves. men are scared, and they need to see tha…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:10 PM
7

i'm personal friends with several platinum editors and a few admins. i know these people in real life, in other words. this is part of an ongoing problem with wikipedia which i outlined in another very long post in this thread. i spent several months, with other editors and many outsiders and anons, trying to get this issue some sunlight. it was categorically suppressed, and it turned into an all-out war. it was the culmination of literally years of attempts by white knights at knocking me off m…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:30 PM
1

people in the comments are fucking retarded. "your link did not prove what you said IT ACTUALLY PROVED MY POINT." "i'm not going to explain how, look for yourself." no, a post confirming that all women's salaries added together and divided by the number of women are less than all men's salaries added together and divided by the number of men does nothing to prove your fucking point. obama said "WOMEN MAKE LESS FOR THE SAME WORK, AND WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A LAW AGAINST THAT!!!" uhh, equal pay act. a…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:12 PM
1

edit: picture for good measure: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5458/8851177537_6eea531414_b.jpg i'm pretty against the death penalty, but only because i don't think a person's life should be taken unless it's absolutely certain that they committed the murder... like if they admit it, or there's video footage of it, or there's some kind of evidence that absolutely guarantees that they did it. like DNA under the fingernails... to me, that's not good enough unless the victim and the accused never kn…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:53 PM
1

addendum: avoid casual sex with women whose 'relationship status' is unknown to you. some women will lie about having a boyfriend so that you will sleep with them, and then the next morning realize that they must tell their boyfriends that they were raped in order to get away with cheating. this isn't unreasonable paranoia, and it's not a bad thing. if you aren't relatively sure that she doesn't have a boyfriend, then you certainly aren't anywhere near sure that she doesn't have herpes, chlamydi…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:39 PM
1

it's up to you what you want to do with your time, but you can't make determinations about what a woman is capable of doing or willing to do "from the start." that sounds like the rationalizations of someone with not a lot of direct experience with dangerous women. i always hear this. "avoid crazy women." well no shit. everybody avoids crazy women except for crazy men. it's not exactly advice. you think there's a man on the planet who doesn't know that he's supposed to be selective about who he …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:28 PM
3

i went into a lot of depth in my posts here. i hope i've answered your question in this link. you are exactly right. every one of her claims is nothing but hearsay. her claims were repeated in the media, and these articles were used as "sources" to "prove" her claims on wikipedia. it's not objective information. it's just the law of repetition, basically. you repeat something as fact long enough and people will just believe it. if they see enough people accepting something as fact, we will accep…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:01 PM
6

basically, matt taylor is an existential crisis for male feminists. they can't have a man who has every positive trait that they have, and every positive trait that they don't have. they have to manufacture some negative trait for him to have, so they can tell everybody "hey look at me, i don't have this negative trait that matt taylor has!" all social justice warriors want is to create a big bad strawman so they can show everybody else that they're not the strawman. it's always insecure people,…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 12:38 PM
9

i ran out of space there but i want to say more, particularly about the culture of censorship on wikipedia. there's an order to the chaos over there. it's a political ideology that blankets the climate there, even though not all wikipedia editors, and even not all prestigious editors, believe in it. why are they afraid of making their opinions heard? why do they have to be so careful, even around editors who are clearly beneath them on the hierarchy of credibility? the simple answer to that is t…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 12:04 PM
6

some of the editors are real ideologues, and it wasn't always that way. sure a lot of editors have left over the years, but a greater number have just been radicalized for lack of another word. i've seen nerdy guys whose main objective was filling in holes of knowledge in obscure subjects grow into disgusting white knights whose new main pursuit is to categorically misrepresent and distort the spin of innocuous statements on relatively vanilla subjects in order to further the "cause of women" on…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 11:31 AM
1

if it's a public school or a private school that gets government funding, they're not allowed to make classes only for boys or for girls. they have to let you join. actually it might be fun. i joined a yoga class that turned out to be all girls except for me and like 2 other guys when i was in high school. basically there can't be an an all-boy or all-girl class in a school with public funding. title IX says it's a big no-no. still, discrimination against boys is seen as standard, while discrimi…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:50 AM
8

it's not about caring about both... it's about seeing two men whose lives were needlessly disturbed and almost ruined, and then throwing your hands up and saying "the real victims are STILL women." people manage to see a man getting murdered and determine that the real victim of his murder is actually his wife, who's now a widow. it's ludicrous. this is the same concept as hillary clinton's bullshit about the real victims of war. this case doesn't involve rape. a rape did not occur. so how are t…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:07 AM
3

an ex-girlfriend did exactly the same thing. told me that she got raped by a friend of mine, when she really just cheated on me with him. she threatened to break up with me if i talked to him or anyone about it. i thought that was a little suspicious. i said i was going to talk to him anyway, and she threatened to tell the police that i hit her if i did that. i thought that was really suspicious... within a week i was incredibly irate about this, so i told her she needed to call the police or i …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:52 AM
4

man look at their facebook post... somehow they managed to twist his comparison to lynching into a disrespect against them, when they're the fucking ones doing it. these people are slime.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:38 AM
0

what? she proposed moving to hong kong with her child. it didn't say at any point that she would leave with or without the child.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:30 AM
3

feminism is one giant circlejerk, after all. words that apply to feminism: religion, cult, circlejerk, fascism, uhhh
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:15 AM
3

good point
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:13 AM
1

no, that's not what i'm saying. second, when you say "you're a rodent," people don't think "I don't want to be a rodent, I best take a look at my actions and consider if they're congruent with my moral ambitions." you are not a moral authority over them. if i call you an "asshole," are you going to change your behavior so that i don't call you an asshole? or are you going to tell me to fuck off? are you going to base your own opinion of yourself based on the words of somebody on the internet? re…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:12 AM
1

1) thanks 2) you can't really identify right and wrong in the vague summaries of what i've done in various points in my life. it's not going to be possible for you to determine if something i did is right or wrong. it's pretty simple-minded to just assume that "asking someone about their sexual assault is wrong" but it's not that simple. i didn't go into detail for a reason... i would have to describe each and every time i did that, and i don't even remember all of the details. 3) you're wrong. …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:07 AM
1

i'm not in college anymore, i finished grad school years ago. when i was in college, i wasn't paranoid about this issue. somebody went down for "sexual assault" while i was an undergrad, and i legitimately believed he did it, and everyone else thought the same. then a year later she admitted she lied about it and they still wouldn't remove it from his transcript. my guess is he can't afford to sue them. i didn't realize what was going on here until years later. i continued dating women throughou…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:44 AM
1

are you stupid?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:36 AM
19

i've been editing wikipedia for almost 8 years and i didn't have any problems whatsoever until i added sources and information to the brianna wu article. all of a sudden i was stormed by feminists trying to get me banned, along with everybody else who dared question the feminist narrative on that article. the sad part is that these people were willing to erase every source i posted just so they could ban me for not posting sources in my edits. this is basically a new phase in wikipedia's history…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:35 AM
45

i'm banned for posting sources contradicting the official brianna wu story. apparently i violated the "biography of living persons" section of the rules by not posting sources. some admin literally deleted my sources and banned me for the exact opposite of what i did. wikipedia, or at the very least brianna wu's page, is infected with feminist volunteers that are so far gone they don't even care about facts...
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:28 AM
37

it's alright. now we can appropriate the "rape culture culture" term which describes the actually toxic culture they've created in the wake of their broadcasted narrative about rape culture. and people will ask us what the fuck we mean, and we will say "you want to see a real rape culture? go to a state penitentiary."
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:23 AM
10

i'm banned from editing wikipedia because i tried to add some information and sources to an article about brianna wu. wikipedia, to my grave disappointment, is literally crawling with feminists... only, these types of feminists are worse. i call them wikifeminists... they really think they are just geniuses, far smarter than anyone who could possibly get into an argument with them online. they're wiki volunteers! who could be smarter!? seriously, most narrow-minded people on the planet... really…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:21 AM
17

i can't wait for the feminists to pat themselves on the back and self-servingly claim that the courts are sexist when pao loses. of course they won't bother to examine any of the evidence in the case, or the court documents to begin with... and just presume that she should win, because she's a woman and when a woman says she was discriminated against, she was discriminated against. then, when pao loses her case because of the evidence which feminists never looked at or published, they will "conf…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 05:16 PM
1

i see that you didn't read it. almost all of that was about some of the non-sexual abuse i went through, and how it affects me today.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:46 PM
1

i feel like the best thing you can do is avoid dating in college, but if you must, let women break up with you. it seems like all these women who falsely accuse their boyfriends do it after he dumped her, or hurt her feelings in some significant way. i don't know how you can avoid being falsely accused by someone you're not dating, other than maybe avoiding women with histrionic personality disorder lol... but i think choosing to never break up with women is one that will make you a lot safer. j…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:45 PM
2

either stop dating altogether until the problem clears up, or get a job as a cop or a lawyer. if women aren't scared of the power you hold in the legal system, they will end up holding power over you in the legal system. most women are probably not likely to falsely accuse you of rape, but the consequences of that small percent are too great to risk it. you either need to hold significant legal power in ruining her life, and defending your life from her ruining, or manage to only date women that…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:39 PM
-4

i ran out of space, but basically what i'm trying to say is that even very early in life, traumatic experiences can have significant effects. in fact, i think if this shit happened to me later in life, it would not have had such a serious impact. i think it fundamentally affected the growth of my brain and my nerves. the autonomic and sympathetic nervous systems function on their own, in some ways. hence "autonomic." the fastest reflexes in the human body are reactions to heat. if you feel somet…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:13 PM
1

phantom dick tip is a real thing and has been studied. if you're circumcised you can probably feel it. just a slight tingle and maybe the occasional sharp needle-like pain every couple weeks or something. i feel it sometimes if i focus on the sensation in the scar where my foreskin is supposed to be. i haven't talked about this with anyone else but i've read about it. i never really noticed it until i read about it. the tingle is real. the scar is the only area i feel that tingle. it's a very st…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:44 PM
2

yeah, i know, and my point is that it's not right to boil an entire political view down to unknown psychosocial factors. also discounting maternal abuse is unconscionable. nobody goes around telling people that the abuse they suffered at the hands of anyone else was not really abuse. this just disgusts me. i was severely abused by a female daycare owner, along with almost every other boy i knew there, and virtually none of the girls were abused. she wasn't a feminist as far as i'm aware but she …
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:43 AM
1

you can only get in trouble for recording this stuff if you get caught or admit that you recorded it. record it and don't release it till the end of the year. once you record it, clear the metadata, and upload it from a youtube account that you've created anonymously while connected to a VPN. if you want i will upload it for you. i have a youtube account that has no link to my personal information, which was made using an email from a german privacy email company (tutanota.de) and also has no li…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:41 AM
1

it just makes us look bad, which makes our goals less likely to be achieved. sometimes you have to play the game to win. i'm not going to ruin our chances of restoring the constitution to its former pedestal just as a matter of principle. if i have to suck it up and withhold my harsh opinions of something, i'm going to. if i make my criticism more civil, it will make people on the fence more likely to agree and help support our cause. sometimes restraint is hard, but necessary. calling restraint…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:34 AM
1

to summarize... considering how many people will falsely claim to be _____, even when their claims are easily verified/falsified, we should be overwhelmingly skeptical of claims that can't be verified. the fact that a claim can't be verified should make it much more likely to be false than a claim that is easily verifiable, such as being a navy SEAL. it stands to basic logic that someone claiming to be a rape victim, and providing no time window or identity of the rapist, is more likely lying th…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:16 AM
1

it's not about empathy, it's about moral authority. if i tell you i'm a child sexual abuse survivor, i now have moral authority and you're kind of in a bind when it comes to disagreeing with me on anything slightly related to sexual abuse. i actually am a child sexual abuse survivor, but i should not have some special authority on that just because i say so. you can't prove that i'm not a survivor, but i can't prove that i am, especially since nobody was ever convicted for abusing me. i do have …
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:46 AM
1

some of us always assume that these people are stupid. i argue that they absolutely know it's wrong, they absolutely know that it's malicious, they just don't care. they care more about publicly decrying rape, and proving themselves to be champions of women, than they care about due process. these are the same kinds of people who care more about getting votes in blue states than they care about the 2nd amendment, or frankly any part of the constitution. many people will cite the first amendment,…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:12 AM
1

no, they know all about due process. they will pass the bar with flying colors... and then, once their foot is in the door, they will mysteriously forget all about due process, ruthlessly prosecute those accused on spurious grounds, deliberately withhold exculpatory evidence, and make specious claims to the mainstream media about how rare false rape accusations are.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:07 AM
2

somebody ought to falsely accuse these students, and see how they like it... maybe if every radical feminist was falsely accused of child abuse or something terrible like that, they would begin to understand the importance of due process, and we could nip this poisonous seed in the bud, before our legal system is undermined by hysteria. then again, false accusation and the horror that follows is an ordeal i wouldn't wish on my worst enemies...
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:05 AM
6

it's funny because the alleged health benefits are extremely tiny and only exist in countries where bathing is extremely rare, and are present for both male and female circumcision. the clitoral hood is both biologically and genetically analogous to the foreskin. these structures are literally coded by the same genes, and are only differentiated due to sexually dimorphic SHh genes and hormonal differences. functionally they are exactly the same. removing the clitoral hood makes it harder for the…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:57 AM
3

nobody said that this was an extremely common or ubiquitous occurrence. just something that happens way more often than children not knowing who their mother is. edit: and if a child doesn't know who his/her mother is, it's probably because she's dead, in prison, addicted to drugs, or because she abandoned the family... not because his/her angry MRA father divorced the mother, miraculously got sole custody, and then never let her see her children again.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:35 AM
2

imagine someone said "Oh, so that's why people are feminists. Daddy issues. This all makes sense now." imagine how that would make you feel
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:33 AM
1

not gonna answer the main parts as they've already been very eloquently answered by other commenters, but i'm gonna have to take issue with the idea that we shouldn't talk about female privileges if they don't harm men. first of all, every female privilege pretty much without exception harms men, because female privilege depends on male disposability. but second, explaining female privilege to feminists is one of the best tools we have in introducing them to the rabbit hole. how can they see tha…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:12 PM
0

i was banned from gamerghazi on my very first post, which was not even a repudiation of their ideology. all i did was ask a question. a moderator responded, not answering my question, and simply stating that i was "banned for using the term 'beta-male' non-sarcastically." i'm not joking here. they literally banned me for using a scientific term which refers to a scientific phenomenon for whose existence there is literally no biological or psychological argument against. the concept of the beta-m…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:31 PM
0

like THINK ABOUT IT dude. if having a foreskin is so fucking dangerous, why do virtually all doctors publicly state that there is no medical reason to get circumcised? every pediatric association in america and canada takes this stance. it's fucking banned in germany for fuck's sake. if having a foreskin is so dangerous, why do so many men choose to have a foreskin? why does virtually every man who is actually given the choice choose to keep his foreskin? because he talks to doctors and he looks…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:23 PM
2

circumcision does not reduce the rate of STI transmission. this is a myth invented in the early 1900s by a circumcised doctor who ran zero clinical trials or scientific experiments on the subject. he just said it like it was a fact, in a time when medicine was hardly based on experimentation, or even rational thought and critical thinking. this was nothing more than a defense of his own parent's actions, a search for validation. a desire to feel less insecure about himself. i am circumcised, and…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:49 PM
2

yeah it's all true. the vast majority of charities are spending most of their revenues on salaries and fundraisers, and a TINY quantity on the actual "charity" part. this is a fun website to check every now and then: http://www.tampabay.com/americas-worst-charities/
/r/MensRights24/02/15 12:05 AM
1

right... that's why, instead of having a conversation about how she interpreted a non-sexual penis joke as some horribly offensive sexist affront to the peoplez of dee earth, she transformed her reason for outrage into "i was in fear for my life," "he harassed/assaulted/threatened me." these people tend to lack self-awareness, but in this case, she knows what happened. she's just deliberately lying, misleading, and misrepresenting in order to continue to wage war against this man she has never e…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:24 AM
2

that's what i keep saying... just another reason for employers to avoid hiring women. she gives women in tech a bad name, solely by being a huge liability. proving to the whole internet how dangerous you are to your boss... yeah, not a good idea. unfortunately, it didn't just backfire on richahrds.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:19 AM
4

i think she was uninvited from pycon events after this, right? but the two men weren't, or something like that.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:55 AM
6

yeah it seems to me that at this point, she's so frustrated by the fact that this enormous backlash ruined her career that she's willing to just kick its corpse, and maybe decapitate it. i'd call that immaturity, but she's definitely stupid as well, or she wouldn't be a SJW in the first place. she's an idiot who's gotten ahead in life by crying racism and basically extorting people, clearly. so she never learned any true hardship, which must have led to her lack of maturity. instead of realizing…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:54 AM
2

you're right, she did. in her response on hacker news... she dropped this bitchy comment acknowledging that it was an overeaction, she didn't intend for him to get fired... then comes out and says she knew what she was doing all along, then says that him losing his job as a father of 3 doesn't matter because he's white and she's black. wow. fuck this cunt even harder with a cactus. i thought i hated her, but this touches a whole nother level. she went full psychopath. how can she trivialize the …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:38 AM
3

one free pass for you!
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:33 AM
3

zero sympathy. just reading the way she speaks about this, with absolutely no empathy, remorse, regret, guilt, shame, or fucking ANYTHING of any meaning... looks like she deserves even worse before she finally figures shit out. there are the people who are capable of taking responsibility for their actions, and apologizing when they needlessly hurt others. then, there are the people who never grew up. adria richards is among the latter. this poor oppressed womyn sincerely believes that donglegat…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:32 AM
0

well you just got out of high school so that doesn't really surprise me. men might be afraid to approach you because of your body language or personality or even the unique local culture. you left a lot of info to the imagination, so it's hard to ascribe an exact reason if that makes sense.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:30 AM
1

yeah anybody advocating censorship in the name of progressivism is part of an immense, unique problem of our time... i wonder how to get through to these people, to show them that ideas that offend them are not any less worthy of being spoken.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:28 AM
5

former GF... keep it that way edit: unless she outgrows it of course, which is probably not too far around the corner
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:25 AM
3

do you have a paypal account? i wouldn't be surprised if people here and elsewhere are willing to help you out. i'll bookmark your paypal and send some cheese after i feed myself if it helps, this post made me incredibly angry and i can't stand the thought of you or frankly anyone going through this shit. which makes me think... it would be a pretty good idea to start a fund on this sub for fathers getting raped by outrageous child support. similar to that sub for free pizza for people in need.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:16 AM
1

i heard that a counterpetition and email campaign got some of those retailers to start stocking GTA5 again
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:06 AM
1

I signed, and then... this happened. go figure. http://i.imgur.com/iYQAsjf.png
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:05 AM
2

no dude you're mixing two things up. willfully, clearly... what he said was that he found it funny that "idiots" think male privilege means something that he doesn't think it means. he didn't explain his understanding. he just verbal diarrhea'd his understanding of the word then matter-of-factly stated that people who don't agree with him on the matter are idiots. there was no explanation. no empirical evidence of this idiocy. no logic formula showing how he arrived at this conclusion. that is l…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:06 AM
1

i agree that what you described IS very masculine. sadly, in today's world, people have completely forgotten about self-sufficiency. both men and women have come to see self-sufficiency as something that cavemen did, once upon a time. it's pretty sad. off-topic, but this is another issue i feel pretty strongly about. i wouldn't call myself a conservative by any means, and i grew up surrounded by hardcore liberals... but it's really disastrous that our culture has forgotten its roots. our culture…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:35 PM
1

how did he back up this point? saying that people who think male privilege is bullshit are "idiots"? how is that not ad hominem? do you even know what ad hominem means, or what?
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:18 PM
1

i know it varies by state, that's why i said it's illegal in california... OP is in california, so. yeah. and no it is not better to have it, did you hear nothing i said? it's ILLEGAL. you can go to JAIL for it. why would you ever walk into a courtroom and hand them evidence of a crime you committed?
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:17 PM
7

the phrase "toxic masculinity" does not refer to something else. somebody already posted a definition of it according to a prominent feminist website. your definition of it is not an argument. it's just your opinion. you haven't provided any evidence that feminists don't think this way. your whole argument is basically a NAWALT. again, that's not an argument, because nobody is saying AWALT... nobody said "all feminists think masculinity is toxic." i wrote a satire of how feminists think that men…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 12:28 PM
4

i don't even know what you are doing in this sub. you seem to have put so little time into understanding the subject we're talking about.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:29 AM
4

dude, calling it "toxic masculinity" is LITERALLY calling masculinity the culprit of the bad behavior the word describes. i don't even know why you're still arguing this. toxic femininity is not 'much less common.' ask any woman whether she has been made to feel like shit by bitchy cheerleaders and the like, spreading rumors about her and trying to ruin her life. ask men whether they've been bullied by jocks and you'll see that it happens quite a lot, but not nearly as much. male bullying will n…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:27 AM
9

i don't do the asking, i just see what feminists write and say. toxic masculinity doesn't refer to a specific type of thing. you might think it does, but it doesn't. your interpretation of a phrase doesn't really matter because the people most likely to use that phrase are using it in a completely different way. it's like saying "well, faggot means a bundle of sticks." yeah i get that faggot means a bundle of sticks, but that's not how it is colloquially used. everything you've described is not …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 08:04 AM
1

yup, neither party can record without consent from both parties
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:58 AM
1

i agree it's a bunch of complete and utter bullshit but he's still an idiot. the jews in the concentration camp were obviously oppressed. but if one of them decided to test a guard's patience, he still fucked up and it should be a lesson for every other camp slave. this is a lesson for all men. don't EVER cum inside a pussy you don't want to impregnate. EVER, EVER, EVER. THERE IS NO PROOF THAT SHE'S ON BIRTH CONTROL. this has happened to so many men that it's completely unreasonable to think tha…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:57 AM
1

on second thought, you could install security cameras in your house and then invite her to have this conversation at your house. if she later accuses you of any bullshit, those might work, and they probably won't charge you with anything. nobody expects you to shut off your CCTV for the sake of a visitor
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:54 AM
1

can't record someone in private without permission in california. don't follow this advice
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:53 AM
1

that's illegal in california. you can't record someone without their permission in california unless you're in a situation with no reasonable expectation of privacy. a meeting involving lawyers would certainly not fit the bill. if you try to meet her in a public place and record it, i doubt they will admit it as evidence because you're just loopholing state law. there are cases i know of where the law against recording someone in private without their consent was overlooked, but these were much …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:51 AM
1

man they will find him... he'll go to jail for that. there really is nobody that can't be found. he would have to completely uproot his entire lifestyle and live off of crime, or in a completely different country. no doubt they will find him on a flight itinerary and have him arrested after landing if he's not lucky. if not, they will figure it out once his payments don't come in and they'll track him to that country. if he hasn't hopped to another country they'll probably find him. i just don't…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:49 AM
1

also tell her that you'll kill yourself if she continues to seek child support. that will tell her that she can't win, unless you're bluffing. either she gets no child support from you, or you're dead because of her and she still gets no child support from you. or you were bluffing and she gets child support from you. if you put on a good suicidal act, and she actually has a conscience (doesn't seem likely considering what i just read about her) maybe you will win.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:44 AM
1

also remember that if she tries to get child support from you, you're gonna get a letter in the mail. you only have 30 days from that point and they have no obligation to prove that you actually saw the letter. don't spend more than a couple days away from your house, you need all the time you can get. once you get the letter you really only have 30 days to contest it, i'm dead serious. you should take to a child support lawyer ASAP so he can tell you exactly what to do if/when you get the lette…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:41 AM
1

and that, my friends, is why you always pull out... no matter what... always. always. no matter what. always.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:32 AM
10

that's really not what i've seen. i'm talking about articles that speak of "teaching boys how to leave behind masculinity," shit like that. i can understand trying to encourage boys to define themselves by something other than their masculinity or their behavior towards women, sure. but that, in the minds of feminist journalists, has given way to the more important, more radical quest of proving that masculinity is a dangerous social construct, and that men are not inherently masculine. instead …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:10 AM
3

but surely you have to know men who emasculate themselves before women. who apologize for their whiteness in subtle ways. who desperately try to avoid portraying themselves in a stereotypically "white male" fashion. since i've gotten involved with men's rights and just general anti-SJW shit, i certainly haven't felt any shame for my testosterone or masculinity. i haven't lost any self-esteem. but that's not for lack of effort on the part of feminists. people i personally know love to make me out…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:59 AM
1

here in the US, women make up a majority of voters. women vote more often than men. yet women primarily vote for male politicians. this is what we see time and time again. why is that? well, fewer women fucking RUN. and there are plenty of men who advocate for women's issues already, so they are more inclined to vote for a democratic man than for a republican woman, because a huge number of women adhere to the feminist ideology. people don't really care about the gender of the people in charge. …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:54 AM
25

Also, calling masculinity "toxic" is hurting men a lot more than pressuring men to be masculine. Most men are already masculine... so the men who are hurt by insecurity regarding their masculinity are far fewer than the men who are being told that their masculinity is "toxic." Feminists, we don't need your "help." We don't need you to tell us that the very essence of our gender is "toxic." It's not masculinity that is hurting our self-esteem. It's your incessant demands that we act more like wom…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 05:12 AM
3

seriously... who would dare to say that women are less comfortable voicing their opinions? they've been screaming in shrill voices for more than a century. not that i'm advocating a return to 19th-century gender politics, but come the fuck on. women have a much louder voice in society today than men have ever had. when men were indeed the dominant culture, at least in the ways that it actually was (lol) the internet didn't exist. TV didn't exist. blue collar men had virtually no way to have a cu…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:51 PM
7

in my experience, extremely diverse movement. the only surveys i've seen have been riddled with sabotage, allegedly from feminists. so i'm not gonna label it one way or another. it doesn't matter what our political views are, we are advocating for one thing. i think the deeper you go down this rabbit hole, however, the closer you will come to the conclusion that the purpose for disenfranchising men, taking them out of their children's lives, and making them financially destitute, is to exercise …
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:32 PM
2

wow not a single person in the comments gets it. not a single person in the comments with a dissenting opinion. that's how isolated these morons are. they're like a fucking cult. they can't handle anything that doesn't conform to their perfect worldview so they completely isolate themselves on an island of unsustainable self-righteousness, and bask in their infinite moral superiority, circle-jerking each other with upvotes and snarky jokes while criticizing others for making snarky jokes for att…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:09 PM
1

it's a bait-and-switch. feminists get to advocate against men's rights, and then when somebody calls them out on it, they say "we just fight for equality, haven't you seen the dictionary definition of feminism?" and who can argue against that? classic motte-and-bailey
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:13 AM
1

meh it's just some "u go girl" song, it sold well and she made her money. i seriously doubt she's the kind of person who actually thinks that way.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:12 AM
1

typical. "i don't really identify as a feminist. more of a humanist." "i don't think you understand what feminism IS motherfucker. feminism is the gospel. feminism is good for everyone. how dare you question that? all feminists know what feminism is, and everybody else is just confused."
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:16 AM
2

where i went to college that would have been utter social suicide. one of the most liberal, virulently feminist, queer-obsessed colleges in the nation, maybe even the world. man, i went there thinking i'd be with open-minded people. ironically, it was being exposed to the so-called "intellectuals" of my generation that led me here. i could never have said out loud, on campus, any of the things i say online today. i would have been a pariah. i doubt i'd be attacked because people were kind of int…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:58 AM
1

god damn this shit. sexual violence has literally nothing to do with masculinity. never have i seen such a successful social engineering program to convince the entire population that men's very essence, that is, the very concept of their being male, is 'toxic.' of course this is predicated on the assumption that domestic violence is conducted by males, so therefore their masculinity must have something to do with it, right? but then there's that inconvenient fact that feminists love to ignore..…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter