~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Discussion on in-gender.com (found in r/WTF) about "accidental" pregnancy. Really disturbing."How about DNA tests before any family court order is rendered?" How 'bout it? Awesome idea. "I doubt that anyone has a problem with child support except under extreme circumstances. It is Mommy Support that is objectionable." I have a HUGE problem with support paid by a man to a former sex partner to support a child they conceived together. In the absence of a formal binding agreement to coparent (marriage being one example, but there are other ways), I think men deserve no rights and should be… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 09:18 PM |
| 1 | Discussion on in-gender.com (found in r/WTF) about "accidental" pregnancy. Really disturbing.I think you are (deliberately) conflating shared legal custody with 50/50 shared physical custody of all children regardless of age and all other circumstances. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 09:02 PM |
| 1 | Discussion on in-gender.com (found in r/WTF) about "accidental" pregnancy. Really disturbing.You've seriously never heard/seen feminists arguing over whether or not some guy a woman fucked nine months ago has a half ownership in the baby she carries and gives birth to? Really? It's kind of a big deal. Parental responsibilities come with parental RIGHTS. If you can track down a former sex partner and demand support (or if the government insists on doing it on your behalf), then you've got a guy in your life who you may barely know who is legally entitled to coparent your child! It's actu… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 03:58 PM |
| 1 | Discussion on in-gender.com (found in r/WTF) about "accidental" pregnancy. Really disturbing.Sole custody IS a bad idea, unless one parent is unfit. I've never heard any rational person argue otherwise. It's when we drill down into the details (legal custody, physical custody, parenting time) that the disagreements emerge. I personally feel that each case has so many variables that legal presumptions OF ANY KIND don't serve the best interests of children. I think that negotiation between parents, and failing that mediation, and failing that a court case where any and all custody configu… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 03:41 PM |
| 1 | Discussion on in-gender.com (found in r/WTF) about "accidental" pregnancy. Really disturbing."That is exaclty what the evidence says is best." Yes. The evidence (such as it is, this a hugely complicated social issue with lots of variables and as such, it's hard for studies to come up with definitive results) says that when NCPs exercise their alloted parenting time regularly, kids are happier, friction between the ex-spouses is decreased, and child support compliance is greater. But that's not what the shared parenting bills are about. The shared parenting bills want a legal presumption… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 01:17 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter