TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

somestranger26 Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by somestranger26 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Foreskin is full of erogenous nerve endings and performs sexual functions. If you had one and it was forcefully taken away from you as an adult, I think you would not be okay with it. Re: yeast infections, do we circumcise girls to prevent yeast infections? Watch this video if you want to know more: https://vimeo.com/26130057
/r/MensRights26/11/18 01:16 PM
3

You're the one making the sweeping generalization that "it doesn't stop them from enjoying it". Minority or not (you have no idea either) it invalidates your statement.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:53 AM
4

There's a risk of death from almost any surgery, hence we shouldn't be doing unnecessary surgery on infants.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:03 AM
5

use a device to make sure they only cut a little bit of the skin That "little bit of skin" ends up being about the size of a 3x5" note* card as an adult. it doesn't stop them from enjoying it. This is not the case for many men.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:02 AM
5

The west coast is uniformly below 50% now. I read that in Washington it is as low as ~20% although I don't think that statistic counts if it isn't done at the hospital.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:21 AM
1

I'd recommend getting into manual restoration because devices require a certain amount of baseline skin to work with. I got a TLC-X a few years ago thinking Device=Better and got discouraged. Now I'm back doing manual + DTR and FED now that I have enough skin to use devices.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:56 AM
1

Full coverage meaning full coverage of the glans. It doesn't matter what type of skin it is, it's still full coverage. That was only in my response because you clearly wanted to discuss that topic, which was not the point of my previous comment. I'm not going to argue with you about the minutiae of restoration. If you're not interested then whatever.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:02 AM
2

I said "from no foreskin to full coverage" you then extrapolated "full coverage with actual foreskin" which I never said. I don't think "external foreskin" is significantly different from shaft skin.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:34 AM
5

You're putting words in my mouth. Even circumcised guys have both shaft skin and the mucosal "inner foreskin" layer. The only things you can't restore are the frenulum and ridged band but people who were circumcised as adults and restored report you can get about 75-90% of pleasure of the real thing.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:16 AM
3

Tissue expansion is used for skin grafts, etc. all the time. It's also how people's bodies don't explode when they gain weight. It is not at all pseudoscience. There are plenty of pictures showing people's progression from no foreskin to full coverage.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:58 AM
2

You can get a lot of the sensations back with hard work and dedication. /r/foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:28 AM
9

More like a million per year. There aren't even close to that many babies born every day in the US.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:21 AM
3

(e.g. phimosis) Easily treated with stretching + steroid cream, or with less invasive surgeries that don't remove the entire foreskin.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:31 AM
3

For example a lot of guys who are restoring report bad smegma / smell if they use soap. It alters the pH and can throw off the microbial balance that you have there. Women are not supposed to use soap in their vaginas for the same reason.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:06 AM
5

But did it really? Before modern medicine, there would have been a far greater risk of potentially deadly infections while the wound heals
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:52 AM
5

I've never understood the "locker room" argument for this reason. I never saw another guy's penis at school and never heard anyone bullying over it.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:50 AM
4

And for the rare cases that this doesn't work for, there's the surgical option that preserves the foreskin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preputioplasty Unfortunately a lot of guys still get circumcised to treat phimosis because they don't do their own research and the doctors do not inform (or are not even aware) of alternatives.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:48 AM
2

Just water. Soap disturbs the microbiome of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:41 AM
1

So to follow up on this, I just received their latest newsletter. We hit our second biggest month for donations in May with a total of $9,633, almost half of our monthly goal. Wow record amounts from donations met almost half of their monthly goal... that does not inspire confidence. $9,633 ($116k annualized) is not going to deliver what they're aiming to do in 3 years. That would pay for like 1 researcher's salary. They would need millions to deliver in the time you're expecting.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:04 AM
2

You can add this to the fund. Thank you for making the correct decision the second time around and owning up to your mistake. If I was your son, I would find forgiveness for those reasons. !tip 0.015
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:57 AM
3

Are you/they aware that the foreskin is not supposed to retract in most 4 year olds (phimosis can't be diagnosed until 18+)? If they were forcefully retracting it, that would obviously cause pain.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:41 AM
2

Medical research is extremely expensive and biotech companies go bankrupt all the time, even with millions in VC funding let alone relying on donations.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:39 AM
0

If you start in your 50s or 60s you will probably make very little progress. Probably because of the natural decline in growth hormone secretion. Taking HGH or growth hormone secretagogues like Mod GRF 1-29 and Ipamorelin should allow older men to restore just fine.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:37 AM
1

Foreskin restoration is not a myth, and neither is jelqing. Not sure where you heard that.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:32 AM
2

The restoration process should happen a lot faster in a child. Intact men's foreskins grow significantly during puberty, so it would likely go even faster if he started while pre-pubescent (maybe age 12). Of course he would have to care enough to follow through; it requires dedication.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:32 AM
2

I mean, it's gonna be out in 3 years or so. That is extremely wishful thinking. As much as I'd like it to be true, I think you will have a massive letdown if you assume there will be no delays along the way for a brand new medical treatment. I'd say closer to 5-10 years if Foregen isn't bankrupt by then.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:24 AM
1

Being circumcised doesn't necessarily make you last longer. Both premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction are more common in circumcised men.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:38 PM
11

Don't make the choice for him, just because you think you are self-conscious. If he has a problem with it, then he can decide for himself. You have the pain aspect completely backwards, too. As an adult, they give you anesthetics and painkillers so it's not a huge, traumatic event. As a newborn, they use very little anesthetic and the babies are wailing in pain as it is performed. It's been shown that the pain restructures the brain even if the babies don't explicitly "remember" it happening. Is…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 09:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter