sometimesatypical Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Having casual sex with men makes them respect you less and treat you worse Fair point, but still more expensive than if I was just going out to feed myself. The point remains of the intent of the action though. Person provides something to another in false pretense using attraction, takes what they actually need, never gives other person what they need. Not gendered, all shitty behavior.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/26 02:00 PM
3	Having casual sex with men makes them respect you less and treat you worse You are right, you didn't, but that is not how forum threads work. They responded to something, you commented on the response, I added some food for thought on the exchange. There is no requirement for me to go back to the original post. If you didn't want to engage in where the thread led to, stat quiet.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/26 01:56 PM
3	Having casual sex with men makes them respect you less and treat you worse Dinner for two for a date is going to be a minimum of $50-70 at a restaurant that isn't Applebee's. That is well above the typical hourly rate of earnings. If that is the carrot, its not cheap. But that is besides the point. Its still an investment shown, when the action and goal was to extract something from someone else under false pretense.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/26 01:53 PM
3	Having casual sex with men makes them respect you less and treat you worse Here is an interesting thought. Is what bothers OP the fact that they like pain (which as you point out, is very common, and nothing wrong inherently) or is it that they give that trust to a complete stranger who hasn't earned that trust? I think its the latter masked as the former.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/26 01:49 PM
3	Having casual sex with men makes them respect you less and treat you worse You are missing the point they are making. They are equating: "Men pay for expensive dates to falsify interest but only want a pump and dump" As the same motivations as "women stringing along guys, showing just enough false interest to get something from them but never giving it up" Both are using false levels of interest to extract from others what they want. Its a human thing, not gendered.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/26 01:45 PM
–	Sex robots are imminent <image> One step closer	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/26 09:40 PM
2	Women should not date, sleep with, or in any way sexually validate men who are conservative/right-wing This is what you call a strawman arguement. It's just "my opinion on how the world works is more important than your opinion." Let's switch one thing.... Conservative Liberal and right left-wing movements are actively shaping policies that affect women’s bodily autonomy, healthcare access, economic security, and legal protections. There we go. See how that doesn't actually say anything?Your entire position is just "women shouldn't date men who view the world differently than me" and neglects any…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/12/25 02:02 PM
3	“Male loneliness crisis” gets the attention it does because society fears lonely discontented men more than it fears lonely discontented women The societal concern of male loneliness has nothing to do with caring about men and more to do with caring about a mass quantity of disenfranchised men. This subgroup has been the center of many major uprisings in history and it is often messy. When enough young men say fuck it to the world, it usually gets violent, fast. The modern world has forgotten this, or most believe it will never happen again but I wouldn't be so sure. So, people should care about the growing tension in this group, even …	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/12/25 05:37 PM
2	Are there viral Blue Pill dating experiments? It has been growing incessantly since forever without any red pill ideology Which is why I stated increased commodity has changed family planning. That doesn't disprove the point that the OP was saying if it is not (which is implied in what you call normie world), it should be easily repeated but no one does. I'm confused on what are you you talking about?	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/12/25 06:03 PM
3	Are there viral Blue Pill dating experiments? You are saying that average people having babies has nothing to do with normie behavior, which is crazy Not at all. I am saying looking at global dating behaviors and family development as proof of one cultures trends is a false comparison.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/12/25 05:54 PM
4	Are there viral Blue Pill dating experiments? 1) none of that was the point I debated against, 2) none of that disproves the point I made and about the point the OP was making.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/12/25 05:45 PM
7	Are there viral Blue Pill dating experiments? more than 100 million births per year Its not that they aren't, its that this is an apples and oranges argument. Calculate those for the western world, in lieu of globally. The ratio of "chads" is rural Yemen is not the same as New York. And the decisions for family in Africa are more readily tied to necessity and availability than pure choice. It was the same in the 1800s USA. Development and a reduction in demand due to commodity fundamentally changed family planning. If that weren't true, the…	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/12/25 03:20 PM
2	Straight men on this subreddit, would you take a magic, gene-altering pill to become gay? (Not a satire question. Be serious.) Yes, that makes more sense. Food for thought, you state you dont believe in the pills, but yet your previous reply and this one clearly shows a bias toward one over the other. It comes off inconsistent as you are showing a disdain towards one style of thinking while providing no context which would be criticism the other way. As someone who argues from the middle of many topics, I can say that comes off like this was a gotcha.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/05/25 07:09 PM
1	Straight men on this subreddit, would you take a magic, gene-altering pill to become gay? (Not a satire question. Be serious.) So you write "not a satire question" in the title, but you actually meant it as a satire question? Interesting.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/05/25 06:01 PM
1	Women are the ones red pilling men, not the manosphere Liberalism is a right wing ideology. While not shocking, that is so wild to see this statement randomly. I mean, its wrong, but it is the current political landscape.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/04/25 05:22 PM
1	Testing a potential partner with no sex, while having casual sex/hook ups with other guys before, makes no sense objectively speaking If you were celibate while vetting, that makes sense. Getting dicked down on the side while you are vetting someone in front of you is bunk. And it won't help you pick better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/08/23 03:33 AM
1	CMV:Men who do not have Narcissist personality Disorder,do not cheat or leave if they are treated justly by their woman. Yeah, I always try to see if these weird stats pan out. Not even remotely close with cherry picking stats, just no way to get even close to 0.8%.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/03/23 04:35 AM
1	What does agreeable mean to you? It is sad that being agreeable, whether it's use is propagated by TRP or not, can never be seen as a virtue to some people. Some people like to be the support, the follower, and doing so caringly is not weakness.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/23 10:43 PM
1	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). I understood your point, but it didn't change the point I was making. You are instead proving my point, whether you know it or not. Let's take away the masculine and feminine, as that seems to be the triggering point. If a person gets up, and goes to work for their family, comes home and keeps their troubles to themselves and tries to keep a smile on for their loved ones, that is often seen as emotionally unavailable and lacking emotional maturity. That is a form of acting stoic. What it really …	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/01/23 03:07 AM
1	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). I'd disagree. While it isn't inherent, there is definitely a higher propensity. And I said masculine, not men. Men and women can both be masculine, but men are more generally masculine in their nature. Besides, anything can be argued with "yeah, but some women do to" because it's a generality, not a universal, so that's a poor step aside arguement. Regardless, that was just one example of emotional communication differences. Here are others, Men often show through action, while women words. Men'…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/01/23 03:37 PM
3	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). Being stoic is probably a good example. It's control, not emotionlessness.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/01/23 07:46 AM
2	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). Glad you liked it	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/01/23 05:48 AM
2	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). Further proof. Millennials (born after 1980), who were in their 20s during the rise of online dating, called "boomers" because there is no way they could attest that it was the same before its advent. You got me there. I am so defeated by the young and omniscient Gen Z.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/01/23 05:15 AM
–	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). Exactly, dad didn't let you near his daughter if you were a scrub. It's actually interesting but abstinence until marraige dropped off significantly in the late 40s and early 50s. Not in the 60s, with the introduction of the pill. Here's an interesting chart about it. I'd think it had more to do with people witnessing a world on fire not waiting to indulge, but that's shear speculation on my part. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2378023120908476	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/01/23 07:30 PM
0	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). One simple way is to remember that men and women emote differently. And im not speaking about bottling up feelings. When women say emotionally mature, they reject men who emote in a masculine fashion because it isn't how they do it. There are tons of emotionally mature men, they just aren't recognized by women as "mature"	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/01/23 06:26 PM
–	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). "We had to work to get quality women" "Yeah, but you could rape them!" Such a bullshit, goalpost leap to try to win an argument. This is why this conversation stalls.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/01/23 06:21 PM
–	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). It's funny, guys in their 40s and 50s (i.e. 80s/90s prime 20s) say this stuff and we get scoffed at. Like somehow, in 2015 the world suddenly changed. You've always had to be both capable and charismatic to be valuable.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/01/23 06:17 PM
–	This is why women have become more choosy (from a woman’s perspective). There are good looking guys who are lonely because they're shy or socially awkward. Even this is only partly true. I've had multiple, good looking and shy friends who had no problems closing. Couldn't get relationships, but closing at the end of the night, the girls would be chasing them. All they needed was a wingman to point it out.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/01/23 06:11 PM
10	Divorce attorney says that in 13 years of practice, the women who were her most difficult or litigious were the SAHMs. Haha, that was a resounding yes if I ever read one.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/22 09:13 PM
36	Regarding the post about women being “paranoid” about assault, what are things that women do in this regard that upset you? This is slightly a tangent from the question, but I hate the contradictory actions regarding this issue and "misogynistic chivalry." I work in construction and have worked in some pretty shady and/or dangerous areas. Over the years, I've worked with a number of women in job trailers. Often I was their supervisor, but sometimes their subordinate. I take this concern very real and have always had a policy to not leave a female coworker alone in a trailer at the end of day whenever possible. I also…	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/04/22 06:37 PM
1	Curiosity Post: What famous people do you find sexually attractive? Marisa Tomei Christina Ricci Kat Denning Kristen Ritter Tom Ellis David Tennent John Barrowman JGL	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/02/22 09:34 PM
1	CMV: most men are secretly attracted to fat women As others said, your examples are curves, not fat. And you are completely dismissing personality. Women who aren't supermodels or photoshopped Instagram models tend to be less shallow and materialistic. This is a positive to the Average Joe and often trumps superficial beauty. I think your argument and stance is completely flawed and shallow. Men have no issues with a size 10-16, but when you get to 28 I bet the numbers dwindle. Some examples of types of celebs who aren't thin and lithe but are …	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/08/21 12:27 AM
3	The top men aren't getting laid now more than ever before I don't mean this disparagingly, but I recommend taking a statistics course. Yes equalizing data is very important because the variance you are observing is not equivalent results, but shifting the data to creT the result wanted. If you are asking women if they had a 100 partners over 50 years, and 23% say yes. It doesn't trend the same with asking women if they had 100 partners over 10 years, and 19% say yes. It is likely, by extrapolation, that if you aggregate the 10 years to 50, maintaining …	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/06/21 02:21 AM
3	The top men aren't getting laid now more than ever before It only limits similar experience groupings for persons in the same data set. Limiting to 10 year periods would only be valuable if each 10 year period had equal distribution to the other 10 year periods.. they didn't. Secondarily, the same spread doesn't limit the other two variables: Length of data accumulation (length of sexual activity) and it still does not Warrenton aplkication to your premise by not representing Men in the graph.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/06/21 02:10 AM
3	The top men aren't getting laid now more than ever before Regardless of my crap math, the point remains the same. The trend data is not a trend unless equal parameters are set for the data set. 40 years of fucking is always likely to show more partners than 20, without a limiting principle. It is % against total partners, that does not have any corroboration to status or value. 1940s would make a woman 29 at Woodstock. Further degrading the data is that this is female only data. It doesn't say whether the guys the 23% of women in the 1940-49 data set w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/06/21 01:54 AM
5	The top men aren't getting laid now more than ever before I don't think your reading this right if you're making this claim. Using your logic, it's incomplete data that can't be compared through 2010. The chart clearly says "since 18 years of age" but does not put a cap like "over Xx amount of years". For example,, someone born in 1989 is only 31, someone surveyed in 1988, looking at data from people born in 1920-29 ( the largest net number) would be at least 59 when surveyed. How could you compare lifetime sex partners of these data sets to each other…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/06/21 01:36 AM
1	Who is more invisible to society, broke unattractive women or broke unattractive men? You really can't be respected and invisible. To respect someone is to give due regard for them as a person. Such as by acknowledging them. While in general I would agree with this, in the context of the question, it doesn't hold up because it is based on group,, not individual. In this context you can be respected but invisible to society. Take certain professions as an example. Military service is highly respected in their profession as a whole while performing duty but membership doesn't guare…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/06/21 12:39 AM
1	What’s the longest you’ve gone without sex or seeing someone since you’ve been sexually active ? 3.5 years	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/06/21 10:13 PM
16	Who is more invisible to society, broke unattractive women or broke unattractive men? Not to mince words, but I think your verbiage is incorrect and your premise is flawed/incomplete. You can be respected and still be invisible in society. Your basic premise ignores personality types, which have a greater impact on your social worth than money or looks. But in terms of you base question, a poor woman can garner social attention (even if unattractive) at a much higher rate than a poor man. You can look at the gender divide in homelessness as a simple example of this.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/06/21 04:03 PM