TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sostopher Archive

View 1 posts and 102 comments by sostopher on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
163

sostopher/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:57 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

This gear isn't that that's issued by the RFS services in Australia. As an Aussie, this looks like a miner more than a fire fighter.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 03:25 PM
8

She said "men should stop raping women" in a debate regarding the rape and murder of a Melbourne woman. Don't editorialise.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 12:42 PM
9

If only some PSOs got on. That's a $189 fine.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:45 AM
2

So? Everyone should be treated equally, and not a sex offender unless they're convicted of such a crime.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:47 PM
94

To steal a comment from /u/thedude346 who commented in /r/nottheonion: Change every mention of "men" in the article to "Muslims" and "paedophile" to "terrorist." It's an interesting experiment, yielding lines like these: Sure, not all Muslims are terrorists but most terrorists are Muslim. I figure it's better to be safe than sorry. http://www.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/comments/243ey5/i_dont_want_my_kids_sitting_next_to_a_man_on_a/ch38nhp
/r/MensRights27/04/14 01:14 PM
4

We are on Reddit. You act like a repost is a new thing.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:28 AM
3

Those comments saying "lucky" really piss me off. What is wrong with people? Huge amount of victim blaming...
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:36 AM
1

No idea why you're being downvoted. You are correct in some aspects. The myth is comparing total earnings of men and women, not factoring in anything except gender. So of course men earn more since more men are CEOs of huge companies.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:50 PM
3

Because women think emotionally, they shouldn't be trusted to handle statistics Don't generalise...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:48 PM
1

le epic greentext mfw
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:04 PM
2

>/r/theredpill >quality discussion Pick one.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:13 AM
1

But we can't release her name Australia has different laws on this than the USA
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:26 AM
4

That was New Zealand.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:23 AM
1

I don't see an issue though.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:10 AM
3

Smells like a troll to me. Look at all those comments. Wow.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 11:46 PM
47

Very Australian turn of phrase.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:41 AM
3

Exactly. The admins look fondly on subs that generate revenue for the site, the more clicks the better for them.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:49 PM
16

Why do you need to antagonise them? Why not discuss it like a rational person? Idiot.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:57 AM
2

"He's just angry because he was arrested by women." What? Did you even say he was under arrest? I'm pretty sure it was "Stand up" as she pulled his arm. Then "stop resisting" as he was tasered and chased. Are these women really that dumb?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 02:11 AM
3

It's hard to hear some of the dialogue. I thought she said they had plans to do that.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:31 AM
5

The OP's title.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:09 AM
223

"But blocking the fire exits is illegal" "No it isn't. I think I understand the law on freedom a bit better than you" Is she serious?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:19 AM
57

The video doesn't show any of what's in the title of this post, though does give an insight into the thought processes of some of these people. And it's frankly amazing, and saddening at the same time. "You can't use militant tactics" "Says you." "Did you just say that militant tactics are not moral principles?" "IT GETS SHIT DONE" -7:00
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:34 AM
2

It's against Reddit ToS to hide ads on your page. So no.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:33 AM
7

So by their logic, 9/11 was justified because ideology?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:30 AM
17

Comments like these are why it's an MR issue: http://en.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/1bh98w/my_brothers_gf_told_him_she_was_pregnant_things/c96pyq6 Male victim blaming, if this were a girl getting her throat slit, would people be saying she deserved it?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:07 AM
5

I think some posts are ok, if there is a debate on Facebook that brings up some good talking points and shows the views of others in society. Google searches, no. Rage comics, fuck no.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:44 PM
-3

Get rid of the fucking rage faces. This is not /r/f7u12. The point the panel makes is that women get paid less because of many reasons, this one being that she works less (carrying less weight). This is a stupid example to demonstrate such a thing. Whilst your comic is ever so slightly better at portraying the point, it's an awful comic and underneath is anti-woman by generalising all women as being like this.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:37 PM
5

Other people do, and they seem to forget what this sub is about. It isn't to bash women or circlejerk about stupid things some women or feminists may have said. This is about showing and advocating the rights of men in today's society and where the law and social expectations fall behind with equality for both sexes. This is anti-woman bullshit that isn't relevant to the sub and shouldn't be upvoted.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:25 AM
4

Still not good at all.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:19 AM
0

Guys, over here! I found a legitimate answer!
/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:36 AM
56

The second panel isn't the best example and doesn't demonstrate the point that well.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:13 AM
0

Go back to /r/gaming.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:57 AM
2

It is still not something this sub needs on its front page. The image is anti-woman.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:54 PM
15

Why does this have so many upvotes? It is anti-woman. I understand 4chan is quite crass at times and does bring up certain good points, but this execution is horrible. You guys should know better. Stop upvoting this shit.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:48 AM
12

Poe's Law in effect. This is a satirical tumblr. It's actually kinda funny reading some of it.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:07 AM
13

The natural progression of this should be punishing all drug addicts/purchasers but letting the dealers go.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:57 AM
4

This is a troll, Jim. We have many. Notice the downvotes.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:47 AM
6

Technically, this one hasn't broken the rules. Downvote and ignore.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:38 PM
1

Female rape victims all over the world have been discredited, blamed and ridiculed in varying degrees and it is still going on. Citation needed.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:28 AM
11

Slightly misleading title... There are two different events mentioned here. The girl that raped these boys, and another girl that accused 3 boys of rape.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:00 AM
1

Did you force her to do it? Was she called a slut and broke down afterwards? /s EDIT: Jeez you people need to recognise sarcasm.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:56 AM
16

Why do pregnant women get priority over the disabled then? Women have been standing up pregnant for the last million years or so. A train ride won't hurt them. Compared with someone with a broken leg, kinda hard to stand on that.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:29 PM
17

The other 4 mothers could have given up their seat. They don't need to sit down to mind a pram.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:19 PM
7

Yes. One post by a troll is everyone in MR. It's so clear now.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:49 AM
1

And that more men suffer prostate cancer than women suffer breast cancer...
/r/MensRights28/10/12 10:02 PM
2

The comments when this was posted on /r/nottheonion Interesting to see some people's opinions. Though there is an SRSr lurking in there saying he's a grade A creeper.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:04 AM
3

This was re-posted on /r/notheonion.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:02 AM
7

HarrietPotter admitted to submitting content that broke the subreddit (and Reddit's) rules. This was a collection of upskirt and down-blouse shots. There was also no proof of such things happening.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:17 AM
4

CP was never posted. Jailbait was shut down because some mods (not VA) were found to have CP. VA deleted his account after Gawker threatened to out him. He was only a mod on Creepshots and did not submit anything, only moderated the forum.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:00 AM
6

He did nothing illegal. Which is why no law enforcement is involved with this guy. People say he shared child porn. You can bet if he did that he'd have been arrested straight after this all came out.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:56 AM
5

For the admin, there'd probably be a log of messages somewhere.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:57 AM
3

or if its just one big joke/troll? Some members claim it is, but others as you can see are completely serious in how they approach it. It's come to that point where nobody knows if it's a troll or if they actually believe their own shit. It's just best to ignore them.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:01 AM
3

But everyone would agree nowadays that those types of services are wrong because they are sexist...because men.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:45 AM
2

Here is a video from a different angle. You can see she strikes him after this long yelling match.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 02:36 PM
2

It was a joke. Under the post, hit the button "Source". It shows how the post was formatted and will tell you how people do it. Don't downvote me because of it.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:55 AM
4

This link tells you
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:51 AM
15

They steal most stuff from /r/LifeProTips. That should help you.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:53 AM
8

Next time take the time to do a bit of research into what you post, and don't just cherrypick to validate your worldview. Says SRS...
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:58 AM
1

I don't have an issue with someone being on here that posts in another sub. As long as they don't break any rules here, I am happy with everyone being in here to be part of discussion. Banning people for going to a particular sub is SRS type crap.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:32 AM
23

Yahoo! Answers is just a sea of trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls. Don't take anything there seriously.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:51 AM
4

Interesting that you're able to go between here and SRS and able to contribute. I would have thought otherwise of an SRSer, but I'm glad that from your posting in MR that you're keeping it rather civil.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:49 AM
2

Rules of this sub are no linking to SRS or affiliated subs.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:46 AM
2

It's not. This is regular pricing for the gig.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:36 AM
11

unless they're women, who already have family courts, of course. What a pointless statement.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:05 AM
10

Legally, she's an arbitrator
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:17 AM
2

Yes, I have seen her point about that and agree with her, but this "quote" is kinda silly.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:44 AM
6

Top comment of the thread, seems as if she didn't say this...
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:57 AM
1

I don't know why you're being downvoted. I got your joke.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:05 AM
1

It's satire, not the real person.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:05 AM
7

I would much prefer an intelligent woman that can hold a conversation than someone no so bright that has to bitch about her friends all the time...
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:10 AM
1

I see your joke, but many others didn't. May want to put a "/s" tag in there. IT'S A JOKE ABOUT RAPE CULTURE PEOPLE
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:11 AM
0

Not really. Our politicians throw shit on eachother all the time, it's not motivated by gender, but because they disagree. However, the leader of the opposition is male, so he is sexist if he critisises her because it's ONLY because she's a woman and not because she's doing a bad job.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:57 AM
3

This needs to be higher...
/r/MensRights18/08/12 02:24 PM
1

Fair point there.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 12:39 PM
0

I know. But it probably doesn't help the subreddit if posts like this are taken out of context and shown with the whole "LOOK HOW VIOLENT THESE MRAs ARE!" etc.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:55 AM
13

Or you know...solving this without violence.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:45 AM
1

Spelling "highering"
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:38 AM
7

Talks about wanting to not be discriminated against because of gender. Misogynist. I love SRS's logic.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:21 AM
4

Not exactly relevant, and has been posted elsewhere.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:29 AM
4

Aug 08 00:26:52 * GenericOffensive has joined #gameoftrolls You may be posting in the wrong subreddit. /r/MensRights does not condone this sort of behaviour, and was Game of Trolls. (BSC being BadSexualComment, a regular contributor to /r/GameofTrolls2 )
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:32 AM
2

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:18 AM
26

This particular post to me feels like a lot of the arguments used with privilege and men.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:57 AM
10

Sexual assault is a bad thing, here are some ways to prevent it Ok, so far so good. Only talks about sexual assault of man to woman. No thanks.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:08 PM
0

/r/askmen is that way --->
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:08 PM
2

Not really a MR issue...
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:39 AM
2

There is no problem with the practice if done voluntarily or for real medical reasons. The MRM has issues with it being done on infants that obviously can't protest to the procedure.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:23 AM
2

You should see the campaign from Steelseries (a well known gaming peripheral manufacturer). All about breast cancer, their tag line being "Because you like boobs right?". Not aiming something that might affect their customer-base a bit more...
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:52 PM
8

I view it the same way as chivalry. It's a nice thing to do, but should not be 'expected' every time.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 10:26 AM
1

I like how the data was dated as 2011, but the act was signed in 2009. Funny that.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 01:50 PM
1

There was a lot of opposition to it when it first came in as a law, but they rarely use it.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:21 PM
3

So because it's that way, you don't think it should be changed because it's a good intensive to not commit crimes?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:52 AM
5

It's difficult for me to feel sorry for someone who stole a car or beat the crap out of somebody and got raped in prison as a result But you don't feel remorse for them. You don't know what they did, or why they did it. They could have had a mental disorder or a bad drug addiction and couldn't afford anything. Do these people know exactly what waited for them in prison? Do they deserve such treatment? No.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:29 AM
5

Their prison term is to serve time away from society, not to be raped. And this prison rape thing is a USA phenomenon, not so common elsewhere.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:20 AM
1

Same here in Australia.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:04 AM
-1

I know. But there are many similar systems in use around the world. I am Australian, but the video's basics are correct. Don't tell them shit.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:41 PM
7

Save your side of the story for court, don't give the police ammunition to use against you.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:01 PM
16

It doesn't matter. If you watched the video, you know that even if you're trying to get your side across you still only hurt yourself. By talking to them you're only going to have evidence put up against you, not her.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:53 PM
43

And that is why you don't say shit to the Police without a lawyer present.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:48 PM
2

Dear god those comments hurt my brain.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 01:35 PM
2

Happened ages ago. Australian humour is sometimes lost on American audiences...
/r/MensRights13/06/12 11:58 AM
11

Not exactly a Men's Rights issue. But hilarious look at sense of entitlement nonetheless.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter