TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

soulangelic Archive

View 0 posts and 529 comments by soulangelic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

How would you know your resume is stronger than the people who get jobs over you? I mean, obviously it isn’t, because THEY got the job, not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:49 AM
–

Inconsiderate people and yelling kids sounds like having a family to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:47 AM
–

Ohhhh, I see what’s happening now. You’re jaded because the job market is tough and other candidates’ resumes are better than yours. It’s just easier for you to blame women in white-collar positions than embracing the idea that you aren’t liked by the people who are receiving your job applications.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:15 AM
–

I think you’re thinking wishfully. Your job is low skill and low effort. And I know — I was a server for several years. Of course, I’m grateful for waiters and what they offer for a dining experience. But to say they provide “99.9%” more to society than another profession (hell, another series of industries) is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:12 AM
–

You know what makes me happy? Great sex with my hot husband without any chance of getting pregnant. Thank god for modern medicine and the ability for women to choose whether or not they have children. I’m fortunate to live in this time period where science is looking out for us in that aspect. You know what makes me happy? Luxury resorts in tropical countries and a full nine hours of sleep every night. Coach bags in my closet and a fully-stocked watch box on my dresser. A beautiful house in a sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:09 AM
–

No kid ever says “I want to be a waiter”, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 05:00 AM
2

This again huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:30 AM
5

It’s just one example. Take Byron if you’d rather. Or Thomas Wyatt? I don’t think “Whoso List to Hunt” is based in chivalry.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:55 PM
7

Oh right, of course, because that’s why Song of Songs is always read at weddings — how chivalrous it is!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:51 PM
13

Seduction and the concept of “wooing” from men have been around for centuries. What do you think the romantic poets were doing their whole lives, for instance? Displaying their aloofness? I think not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:48 PM
4

Oh, you mean post-birth. Not biological reproductive rights. See, there is no male equivalent to abortion. Perhaps the closest thing would be the medical removal of parasites from the body — but that right isn’t being infringed upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:43 AM
4

Which reproductive rights don’t men have?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:35 AM
2

What are you talking about? What happens a lot on this feed? You telling people what happens in their lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:30 PM
4

I don’t know what you’re trying to get out of your post, that’s why I’m asking you. It wasn’t a rhetorical question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:29 PM
6

You don’t know what you’re looking to get out of your own post?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:26 PM
4

What exactly are you looking to get out of a debate with this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:24 PM
6

Lmfao brother how are you going to tell her about her own experiences like you know better than she does about them?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:23 PM
6

Right….it’s YOUR friends that have gone through it…so it’s still specific examples from your own life. My point is that there isn’t really anything to debate here because nothing in your post is based in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:21 PM
11

I feel like a lot of these examples you’re giving, if not all of them, are very specific examples from your own life? I could very well give my own anecdotes of men who are constantly complaining and it would carry an equal weight of everything you’ve said in this post. Also, on a more general scale, I don’t think being emotionally intelligent and complaining about things are mutually exclusive? You can be emotionally intelligent and still complain about things that annoy you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:18 PM
2

What on earth are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 06:17 PM
3

You’re making all kinds of excuses for something that is very simple. You said it yourself, he knows she didn’t choose this. He chose it for her. And even after he confirms that, he still has sex with her. That’s rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:44 PM
5

He most certainly did not off himself to save her. He took the pills and then changed his mind and went to throw them up. He was going to chicken out like he’s done throughout the entire movie because he’s a coward. The only reason he died is because Nikki made her wish before he could get his fingers far enough down his throat.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:08 PM
5

Bear is 100% a rapist. He kept having sex with Nikki even after he found out about the wish and how it affected her and made her obsessed with him against her will. You can even see tears in her eyes when he’s having sex with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:06 PM
4

I think it’s ambiguous as to whether or not pre-wish Nikki has feelings for Bear (or is it Bar, since it’s short for Baron?) So, we can’t judge Nikki with confidence as to whether or not she’s “spineless” for not approaching him first for a relationship. It’s obviously made very clear to the audience, though, that Bear IS in love with Nikki and still misses every available opportunity to do something about it before the wish happens. Also, I’m not sure what your point about “calling Nikki ‘brave…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:29 PM
5

Dark romance is just one subgenre of the romance genre, and it isn’t even the most popular overall, it’s just trendy right now. Contemporary romance has always and will always be king in the genre fiction market. And, yes, there are lots more “John the car mechanic”s in contemporary romance. Personally I find contemporary romance boring. I’m more of a historical romance girl. But I can’t deny the sheer number of other women who enjoy it as a subgenre.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 01:00 PM
6

This is the second time you’ve said “miniature” and I have no idea what it means. Can you give a synonym so people know what you’re talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:53 PM
–

I’m not necessarily saying that you’re wrong there, either. I would even agree that most men would probably prefer to raise a child that is genetically theirs than raise a child that isn’t. But my point with that is (and it’s stemming from the other commenters’ remark about not wanting access to women, but wanting access to family) that in that case, it isn’t truly family that these men are after. It’s reproduction. Which is inherently access to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:32 PM
–

? What are you talking about? You can interact with kids who are adopted as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:30 PM
–

Then it isn’t family that these men are looking for, it’s reproduction. They want to leave behind their genetics, not a legacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:25 PM
–

Then that’s toxic thinking that should be changed. If these men, who are so motivated for a family and a legacy, refuse the option to carry on that legacy just because their genetics don’t match, then they must not want it as bad as you or the other commenter are claiming they do. If they consider raising an adopted child “worse” than not having a child at all, then it’s not family they want, it’s just reproduction. And you can’t have reproduction without a woman. And we’re back to the beginning…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:24 PM
–

A prostitute will sleep with you, not give you a child? Not sure where prostitution fits in here — you said it yourself that it’s not about access to women. How do you propose it’s “meaningfully” different? Just because it’s not your blood? If family is the most important thing to these men as you claim, then “tough” shouldn’t be the thing to stop them. If they don’t want to raise their family by themselves, then they must not want it as badly as you say they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:12 PM
–

You can’t have a family of your own without a woman, though. If family is so important to these men, why don’t we see many of them adopting a child to continue their legacy instead?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:03 PM
2

Well the flair checks out, hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:33 PM
4

So be it! Just wanted to voice my own perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:30 PM
3

Meeeee in the future. I’ve been on the pill since I was 18 and if my husband ever gets a vasectomy, I’m not looking forward to what they’ll be like when I finally hop off.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:10 PM
9

I like being pretty. It feels good to me to be feminine. I think women are typically more in tune with their bodies because of our reproductive system, which I appreciate too, even though periods suck. I like the idea of “feminine wiles” and being able to use them at my will (men have pretty privilege too, of course, but there’s a certain power that comes with being a beautiful woman that I don’t even think a handsome man can achieve). I think women are more in tune with nature and life because …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:43 PM
10

I’m a woman and I like being a woman, fwiw — I wouldn’t want to be reborn as a man if I had the option. Sure, we have our own battles to deal with, but personally I feel (at least in my life’s position) that the pros almost always outweigh the cons. That being said, I don’t want kids, so a big part of traditional womanhood (motherhood) doesn’t and will not apply to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:34 PM
0

What are you focusing on? Because the way the post reads, it’s not even relationship-focused, just simply attraction-focused. So, yeah, women might want to have sex with someone who’s sexy and also an asshole, but it doesn’t mean the man is relationship material. The standards can be different for one-night-stands versus standards for someone you want to have a relationship with.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:20 PM
6

Woof you just lost all credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 09:58 PM
3

Just a few points to leave here: Rich, famous celebrities aren’t worth comparing to the average person because they obviously don’t have the average experience. Healthy adults regardless of gender should be able to be independent and capable of living successful lives with or without a partner — a partner should be there to enhance life, not be a mandatory factor in it. The difference is that independent people WANT a partner, but they don’t NEED them in order to live a healthy life. Women and m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:48 PM
–

Men’s libidos do indeed decrease when they’re under pressure. Not sure where you’re making your bizarre assumptions from.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:11 PM
2

Why would a one night stand between two consenting adults cause bitterness? As long as everyone’s clear on what they’re looking to get (or not get) out of it, everyone leaves happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:23 PM
2

Yeah? I bet you know way more alcoholics than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:52 PM
4

Guys with a drug or alcohol habit come to mind first. Hot enough for a one night stand, maybe, but I wouldn’t want to date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:50 PM
–

Being average is never a selling point in anything. When you buy a phone, do you want a phone of average quality or the highest quality? Not comparing dicks to phones — just pointing out that saying “Why is average sized dick not a selling point?” is a bit of a silly question.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:25 AM
1

He’s 5’11” and half white half Mexican
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 02:09 AM
4

I definitely don’t find a lot of men super attractive at first glance. Rarely do I go out in public and see a man and think “Damn, he’s hot.” Fortunately, the first time I saw my now-husband, I thought, “Damn, he’s hot.” That was 10 years ago. He’s only gotten hotter. I look at him doing something mundane and at least once a week I think, “Damn, he’s hot.” I am a very lucky woman. ETA: and yes, I did make the first move — I’m guessing it had to have been obvious because we got together pretty qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:43 PM
3

I never really had the chance to be a single adult because I started dating my husband ten years ago when I was 18 and in college. Obvs I have no regrets and wouldn’t have it any other way, but if I had to speculate, I’d say a fair standard before I decided to have sex with someone would maybe be a little longer than average. Maybe 10 dates? Somewhere around there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:43 PM
–

What about men who get cosmetic surgeries?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 09:33 PM
5

I’m 27 and I still don’t really feel ready for a child. My husband and I have never really wanted kids in the past, but we’re more open to the idea now rather than when we were together nine years ago. We can afford it financially, but there are other sacrifices that come with a child that we have to seriously consider. We’ve agreed that we’re gonna give it until I’m 35 to see how we feel, and then if it doesn’t get to a “100% yes” from both of us by then, we’re just going to enjoy the rest of o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 04:56 PM
6

Sure it will, it’s the same concept. If there are two average men at a bar and one of them is charming and the other isn’t, who has the better chance overall? The one with a neutral attractiveness and a positive sociality, or the one with a neutral attractiveness and a negative sociality?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:45 PM
11

If you meet two hot guys in a bar and one of them is charming and the other isn’t, you’re going to go with the one who’s charming. People like people who know how to socialize.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:53 PM
1

I saw that clip. Genuine question, was he not falling asleep at the wheel at the very beginning? That’s what it looked like to me. Regardless, her grabbing the wheel really wasn’t the best and brightest, was it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:38 PM
6

Sure they do. It’s all body modification. It’s all about changing your own appearance. You’re just stubborn.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:13 PM
5

Of course it is. You see something in the mirror you don’t like, so you pay to get it fixed. Then it doesn’t bother you anymore because it looks the way you feel like it should look. What part of that isn’t for yourself? Would you say the same thing about someone who’s fat and decides to lose weight? It’s all about liking what you see in the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 07:59 PM
39

Oh yes, it does seem very wise to start off an entire relationship — and potentially a marriage — on secrecy and lies. Very healthy, very normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 05:14 AM
4

Lol I don’t know why you’re trying to argue this with me, I’m just saying I wouldn’t be interested in taking out a ruler and measuring my dick if I had one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 04:09 PM
1

As long as I can function normally and lead a relatively healthy life, I don’t really care about a number. Same reason I haven’t taken an IQ test. It’s just not super important to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 12:35 PM
19

Who the fuck cares about the specific inches? If it feels good, it feels good. Tbh, I think measuring your cock is kind of cringe. I’ve never cared about asking a guy “Hey, how long is your dick?”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 04:55 AM
–

You sound young.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 04:18 PM
–

It’s normal for long-term relationships to have the occasional dry spell because life gets in the way. A breakup after two weeks is wild. It’s not a good look that you’re just willing to call it quits whenever the going gets a little rough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 01:12 PM
1

It’s not your business if an individual woman chooses to have an abortion. Voting for human rights on a whole, societal level should be your business.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 10:42 PM
2

That does not shock me
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:47 PM
7

Sorry, I think that you’re just straight up wrong with this one lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:38 PM
4

Is your suggestion that straight men and women should just never have sex in their lives, then? Because that seems pretty unrealistic to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:37 PM
2

It’s not their business, but they still have an opinion on whether or not it should be legally allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:34 PM
13

Having an abortion and having sex are two exclusive things. You can have sex without having an abortion. The male equivalent to “I don’t care if men have sex” is quite literally just saying “I don’t care if women have sex”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:32 PM
1

I think that pretty much every man has a strong, staunch stance on abortion one way or the other. Saying “I don’t care if women can abort” would probably just be untrue in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:26 PM
34

Seems like you might be a little jaded with this one chief
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 03:11 AM
0

Lmfao, you cannot make a debate post and then say “this isn’t about you” when someone disagrees with you
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:20 PM
3

It bugs you? I think it’s great, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 09:33 PM
23

This cracked me up. Idk why. I think it’s the period at the end…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 09:31 PM
1

r/MenandFemales
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 09:06 PM
–

You’re basing the majority of this post on clickbait social media videos? Do you have anything else that’s actually credible that you’d want to include? Also, I don’t think the title of your post has really anything to do with the body of it. This post isn’t about difficulty in dating — it’s about how promiscuous you think the younger generations are.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 09:02 PM
3

Nope. Chemistry is 100% a necessity for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 03:04 PM
3

It hasn’t changed my behavior as much as it’s reinforced it. Any man or woman with red pill rhetoric will no longer be a part of my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 01:04 PM
4

That was the general “you”, not you specifically. Women included.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:08 PM
6

You can enthusiastically enjoy sex with anyone you’re sexually attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:04 PM
9

Yeah, this is a great point too, and I feel like not enough people understand it. It’s going to be a lot more effective to create a sexy environment for your partner — even with just a tender kiss or a flirty compliment — than just go up to them and say “Hey babe, want to lick it?”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:57 PM
10

You’d seriously be satisfied with a two-minute pity handjob? At that point just do it yourself. Sex or sexual activity isn’t supposed to be an obligation that you do out of pity for your partner; it’s supposed to be mutually and enthusiastically enjoyed by both parties. Maybe it won’t be the best sex you’ve ever had EVERY time, but it should at least be fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:55 PM
–

I really feel like you’re wasting so much unnecessary energy on this made-up scenario that has gotten completely out of hand on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:21 PM
2

Why are you trying so hard to talk me out of my choice? I already told you what I would do in this absolutely bizarre “gotcha” setup of a scenario. Accept it as my answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 08:55 PM
4

I figure I’ve got a good three days before thirst becomes a real issue. I’d take my chances with the bear becoming uninterested within that amount of time and going off to look for easier prey. Definitely a more viable strategy to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:31 PM
3

I mean I’d pick the polar bear because polar bears can’t climb trees. If it was a grizzly, though, I’d pick the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:22 PM
–

I think you just spend too much time online, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 04:53 PM
15

This again, huh? It’s tired and simple — have whatever preferences for a partner that you want, just be a) realistic about the likelihood of those preferences b) open to criticism by potential partners if you’re a hypocrite about those preferences, and c) unwilling to shame anyone who doesn’t meet these personal preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 07:42 PM
2

Did you seriously just “#Catastrophe” in a Reddit comment? Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:07 PM
–

Then stay single. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:14 AM
–

Good luck with that strategy. If you’re putting in 70% into a relationship and she’s putting in 130%, resentment is going to build regardless — and it’s going to build quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:56 PM
–

She’s doing 50% of the income and 80% of the housework. You’re doing 50% of the income and 20% of the housework. So how are you making up for how much less you’re doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:41 PM
–

r/MenandFemales You expect the woman you’re in a relationship to do the vast majority of household chores for the both of you AND ALSO contribute 50%? Meanwhile, you’re contributing…what, exactly? 50% and what else?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 08:29 PM
–

Unless she’s pegging.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:36 AM
–

God, thank you. I read way too many comments before I got to this one — what I was looking for. OP, this guy is right — if you’re choking your partner from the front of the throat, and limiting airflow through the trachea, you aren’t doing it correctly and it can be very dangerous. The correct way to choke is to squeeze the sides of the throat and restrict the bloodflow, which allows your partner to breathe normally and still get the sensation they’re looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:34 AM
3

I am not at all talking about sex here. I am saying that it is unfortunate that you have children and, apparently, are wholly uninterested in their personal lives. That’s a very quick road to resentment and no contact.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:20 AM
5

No, I don’t think “BadGirlsBible.com” can be considered a reliable source, thanks. Talking will only get you so far. If you’re a virgin — which, presumably, is what you’re talking about, since you’re advocating for no sex until marriage — then how do you even know what kind of kinks you have until you try them out with someone? How do you know anything about your own sexual preference unless you experience it? Sure, you can guess based on what kind of porn appeals to you, but that only covers wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:15 AM
1

Mmm. That’s truly unfortunate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:07 AM
-2

Good to know you’re uninterested in your children opening up to you about anything going on in their lives. Hopefully you don’t have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:00 AM
8

No, not everyone over 35 has a dead bedroom. No clue where you even came up with that. Sexual compatibility cannot be “fixed” in a long-term, satisfactory way. If you aren’t into something — like your partner’s kink — then you can’t force yourself to be into it. Certainly sex shouldn’t be the only important thing in a marriage — but for most people, it sure as hell is high on the list.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:58 AM
13

God, I hope you’re not telling anyone to wait until marriage for sex. Imagine marrying someone and THEN you find out you aren’t sexually compatible. Not responsible at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:50 AM
–

Jesus Christ, another “makeup is evil” post? Y’all need to get new talking points, it’s the same “debate” here every week
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:15 AM
–

Are you looking for personal anecdotes, or…..? I guess I don’t know what you’re looking for if you’re already skeptical of the statistic you referenced.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 04:35 AM
6

I would take the man in both instances, attractive or otherwise! My chances in hand-to-hand are probably pretty low for both, but I reckon I’ve got a lot better chance of surviving against a man than a fucking bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 08:10 PM
1

In your personal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 07:56 PM
6

You think it’s just white women who can be materialistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 07:53 PM
4

You know what? I was trolling you, but this is a decent response. Respect. I’m sure it wasn’t anything personal in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:02 AM
6

Wanting it rough ≠ wanting to “get it over with”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:23 AM
3

Go ahead and explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:55 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:45 PM
1

People have been writing love letters and using pet names for 1000+ years, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:16 PM
2

Are you asking because you think that people in the modern day are too up-in-arms about adultery? That’s kind of the vibes I’m getting from this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:03 PM
4

You’re kind of telling on yourself with this one, chief.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:47 PM
3

If you started watching porn at 13 and didn’t have sex until you were 17 or 18, I don’t think the situation would have been any different — you still would only know about sex from what you learned watching porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:45 PM
3

I was with you until this comment. You can’t seriously blame teenage girls not having sex with you for your failure to learn about sex properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:37 PM
8

The MeToo movement wasn’t at all about “making it illegal for rich/powerful men to have casual sex”.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:47 AM
1

It’s fine, it doesn’t really matter that much, it could just make your point a bit easier to come across.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:21 AM
2

The word is just “regardless”. Anyways, your sentence was just confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:18 AM
2

Do you mean “irrelevant”? “Irregardless” isn’t a word.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:15 AM
2

I think that the idea of “fairness” in this category can only really exist if there’s entitlement to women/men in dating. That is, saying “She won’t date me because I’m short, it’s unfair” gives the implication that you thought you were entitled to a date from her despite your height. Because no one is entitled to date anyone else, there can’t be a concept of “unfairness” imo. I’m using the general “you”, here, of course, and only bringing up height because it was an example in the OP. ETA: Simi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:02 AM
2

I didn’t say he was lacking in sex. My point was that bragging about having sex in an argument that has nothing to do with it diminishes credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:16 AM
8

I think this might be a lost cause at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:01 AM
10

Again, it’s not the difficulty of the chores, it’s the frequency. I’m not really sure how much clearer I can be about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 01:32 AM
7

Seems like you might be getting a little emotional about this. Maybe take a breather and come back later.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 01:28 AM
15

I’m not arguing that repairing a car is more complicated than doing the dishes. I’m saying you repair a car maybe once every six months, you clean the gutters once a month. The dishes are every day. The kitchen is every day. Making the bed is every day. That’s my point — it’s not an equivalent comparison. ETA: by the way, I didn’t say that it was only women doing housework. But you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 01:08 AM
13

I’m sorry the division wasn’t the best for you. I think that if you’re in a relationship where you share a living space, there are some days where one of you may put in 60% and the other puts in 140%, and you do it because you love them and you want to carry the load for them sometimes when they aren’t at their best, but overall it should even out to a nice 100% average per partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 01:06 AM
5

Sure, Jan…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 12:21 AM
9

Woof, and there goes any credibility you ever had here. r/ihavesex
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 12:16 AM
33

I think the majority of people really just want equal parenting if you have kids. Expecting one parent to do all of the parenting work is exhausting. Also, as a completely separate point, you can’t really compare “handy” chores like fixing a car or repairing a roof to everyday chores like cleaning the kitchen and doing the dishes. The frequency just outweighs it too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 12:00 AM
–

I’m kind of doubting you’re blue pill to be honest. Also, why do you think there’s not a male equivalent to “cat lady”? Because men are permanently seen as bachelors and women are seen as spinsters.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:57 PM
3

Oral sex is not a porn thing? It’s an entire category of porn. What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:38 AM
3

We can just agree to disagree. I’m not really interesting in arguing about it with you right now, since I wasn’t the one that commented anything about exploitation in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 07:17 PM
4

You certainly can decide to date whoever you want. I still think of 18-year-olds as kids, personally. I don’t think it’s that uncommon of a view, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 07:14 PM
12

Every 18 year old thinks they’re a fully capable adult, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 07:12 PM
3

You are too cute
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 05:48 PM
7

Oh, so you’re, like, an actual misogynist, not just someone who says the occasional negative thing about women. Nevermind then.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 05:47 PM
7

Loyalty, support, care, comfort, decisive input, someone to rely on in good and bad times. Just to name a few.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 05:41 PM
–

Your exact words were “have you listened to any woman speak in this matter”, but you aren’t listening to any of the women who are here right now telling you otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 07:18 AM
–

You literally have women in the comments on this post speaking on this matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 07:12 AM
–

I don’t think OP is necessarily ugly, I just think he’s likely quite young
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 07:00 AM
–

Holy shit lol what a wild response ETA: Okay so you changed your response — very confident moves, very certain of yourself and your argument here
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:44 AM
–

Yeah…..I’m not clicking any YouTube links.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:41 AM
–

I don’t know who “they” is or what they’re lying about. It seems like everything you’re saying in your OP is purely anecdotal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:36 AM
–

Of course women care about looks. The point is that looks aren’t the only thing that matter. But looks reel ‘em in — everything else keeps them there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:31 AM
5

Eh, in my case, it depends. If I don’t deem a post or comment in this sub to be taken seriously, then I won’t take it seriously — I’ll be pretty casual about my responses. Sometimes that means saying something snarky, sometimes it just means sharing my opinion and then not responding to any replies. But I don’t think that constitutes as trolling, because I mean everything I say and I’m not just saying it to rage bait. If I DO feel like a post or a comment in this sub deserves to be taken serious…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 04:18 PM
10

God help us if you’re engineering anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:18 PM
6

What the fuck are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:14 PM
18

Okay, so you’re just a completely illegitimate debater. Good to know that people shouldn’t take this post — or you — seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:08 PM
18

You’re making the claim, so therefore a source is your responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:56 PM
6

Lol — so women in academia know nothing about themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 12:29 AM
2

18 is too young for either situation in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 05:38 PM
4

How many subs are you gonna post this on?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 06:44 PM
1

What does “with age filters” mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 05:35 AM
7

Okay, so you’re arguing semantics, which is fine. I’ve neither agreed nor disagreed with the post; my only comment was that it’s tired and posted here too much, and as I said earlier, that’s all I care to say about it. Have a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:54 PM
5

Not really. I haven’t contributed anything to it and I don’t care to other than to say it’s boring and worn out. Good try at a gotcha, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:35 PM
6

So by that logic, everything you say is meaningless as well. Post closed people, everyone can go home.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:12 PM
11

Damn, no wonder it seems tired.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:11 PM
19

This again? This is such a tired whine.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:23 PM
–

Here you are saying “most women” again with only your own personal anecdotes to back it up. The other commenter even provided a link for you to consider how you’re wrong and you’re still being stubborn about this for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:44 PM
–

That sounds like a fucking miserable way to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:31 PM
–

Yeah…..so you’re just pulling the “most women” thing out of your ass after all. Typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:30 PM
–

Can you provide the statistic you noted this from?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:29 PM
–

Fair enough!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:49 AM
–

Oh the other hand, what if they are, and they choose to watch porn anyways?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:44 AM
–

Yeah? You can tell how many people someone has slept with just by the way they act?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:16 PM
–

You have the right to ask, and she has the right not to answer. She also has the right to stop seeing you for asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:16 PM
1

Yeah I’d second this! You can have “burning sexual desire” for a person and hold off on having immediate sex for a variety of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 11:06 PM
13

This is labeled as a question for men, but there doesn’t actually seem to be a real question posed here — just a really dumb hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:36 AM
–

What? What point were you trying to achieve here?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:32 AM
1

I mean I would wonder if she had any past sexual trauma, even though not all women who fantasize about being raped are traumatized. But I would consider the possibility, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 08:24 PM
1

As in, she fantasizes about raping, or she fantasizes about being raped?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 08:11 PM
5

Women do have preferences. Of course, I’m in the camp that women generally don’t prefer guys that treat them like shit. But I know redpillers hate hearing this. I don’t really argue about it anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:58 PM
5

Oh, so your comment is just poorly written.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:56 PM
6

Eh because most people want to try and be a good person for the sake of being a good person. Sure, if you’re attractive enough, you can get away with being a dick — but you’ll get much more respect as a whole from being a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:54 PM
9

But even if THAT were the case, men shouldn’t strive to be assholes, they should strive to be good-looking. Otherwise they won’t even get through the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:47 PM
1

You’re still using your definition of the term, though, when you’re referencing your personal experiences. This is not the typical, mainstream definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:43 PM
4

100% men, especially on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:42 PM
12

Libido is unrelated to how quickly or easily one can orgasm. The only connection between libido and an orgasm is having the desire for an orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:40 PM
15

Then it’s not the asshole behavior that attracts women, in that case — it’s good looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:26 PM
2

I think you have a warped view of what “pumped and dumped” means. The term is usually used to convey when a man has deceived a woman into a relationship under the guise of commitment but breaks up with her after she has sex with him, since that’s all he was after to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:18 PM
3

Fantasies may be uncontrollable, but they’re still worthy of judgement. I disagree completely that it’s unfair to judge people for them. If a man tells me he fantasizes about raping women, I’m immediately going to believe he’s dangerous and not meant to be around.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:47 PM
7

This would have the opposite effect you intend — it would only make women angrier.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:45 PM
1

Sorry, we already gave it to your children.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 01:44 PM
–

Oh I’m sure it happens to a rare few. But this post, specifically, seems like a fetish post.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:17 AM
-1

All women don’t have to arm themselves or use weapons. They just have to congregate with a number of women that DO arm themselves and know how to use a gun. A good shot only needs a single magazine — and a single woman — to kill 8 men. Certainly more than two.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:48 AM
-1

Men cannot “easily” disarm women if they’re shot before they can try. Or do you seriously think that these men would disarm these women before a single one of them could get a shot off?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:43 AM
1

I would certainly hope you aren’t, but it does disturb me that it was your immediate thought. Brute strength doesn’t really matter anyways if women are armed and know how to use a weapon. You can’t outrun or out-muscle a gun.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:39 AM
1

Where did rape come from? Why is that the first thing you thought of in response to this comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:34 AM
–

This seems like a fetish post to me, ngl
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:25 AM
–

I mean clearly we are missing the rest of the conversation prior to that comment, so I wouldn’t call it the starting point
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 09:02 PM
1

Eh I mean at this point I think y’all might just be arguing semantics
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:25 PM
–

This was 100% a fumble
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:18 PM
–

You couldn’t have fumbled this harder if you tried lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:55 PM
17

Straight women don’t watch lesbian porn because they’re sexually attracted to the women in it; they watch lesbian porn because it’s focused on the female orgasm. This isn’t always the case with straight porn, which is more often than not focused on the male orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:15 PM
–

So you’re suggesting women get together with men they aren’t attracted to, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:13 PM
8

To clarify — are you saying that if she’s spending time alone with you, but not having sex with you, something is up? Or did I misunderstand?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 04:35 PM
1

Did you miss the majority of my comment, where I contributed to the discussion even though I know this post is made in bad faith? What about the dozens of replies under my comment that prompted discussion from other members of the sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:16 AM
–

Lol. No, I am not saying anything like that. But I give you a 7.6 for your floor routine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:32 PM
–

No, I don’t think saying “if you want sex, you have to care a little bit about the person you’re trying to get sex with” means that it’s women holding sex over your heads or “controlling” you. That’s an unhinged line of thinking tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:24 PM
–

Uhhhh what
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:04 PM
–

Naw, I would argue that they do. You have to give somewhat of a fuck about the person you’re trying to get with. Otherwise, why would you want to get with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:48 PM
–

Anyone who wants to get laid by a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:45 PM
–

Yeah, this is basically it, OP
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:43 PM
4

Of course they do. It’s natural to feel protective of your partner, regardless of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 01:36 PM
19

I’m not familiar with what you’re referring to as of “feminist doctrine”.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 07:01 AM
23

It’s less about women being able to protect themselves and more about caring about someone so much that you WANT to protect them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 07:00 AM
3

No, I don’t; please spell it out for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 07:00 AM
5

What risk are you referring to specifically? And, what do you mean by “when women are no longer safe”?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:56 AM
21

Huh. Well that’s….certainly some way to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:41 AM
21

I….don’t understand the relevance your comment has to mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:12 AM
16

No, OP didn’t give a single example of the “consequences” he’s referring to in his post, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:12 AM
32

No, I don’t agree with that at all. You think that liberal men don’t want to protect their partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:10 AM
2

Yes, I’d agree with that then. It’s why, as OP made a point to note in his post, women do cross the street at night when encountering a group of men they don’t know vs. meeting them in a social environment. I don’t think that’s misandry, personally, I think it’s just a self-preservation instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:10 AM
0

Is your point that women should adjust their behavior in order to avoid being preyed upon by men? It’s a bit unclear.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:56 AM
68

Oh yes, this post is certainly made in good faith. You can tell by the last sentence. Women do usually prefer men who are invested in a relationship, committed to them, and willing to protect them. These aren’t exclusively conservative qualities, and it’s so bizarre to portray them as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:53 AM
25

Can you specifically mention which “consequences” you’re speaking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:27 AM
1

That’s cute
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 12:24 AM
3

Well considering I’m both a woman and lean somewhat anti-porn, I don’t follow porn accounts on Instagram. And also, having a location tracker on your SO’s phone for the sake of safety is one thing, especially if they travel for work a lot. But constantly needing to know where your SO is every second they aren’t with you, just because you think they MIGHT be with someone else, isn’t at all healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 10:29 PM
2

r/MenAndFemales
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 08:05 PM
–

Experiments have been done that have proved what, exactly? Creepy in this sense addresses behavior, not looks. It’s the way a person acts. ETA: you can block me all you want, but it just shows that you’re a toddler throwing a tantrum for me asking a simple question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:48 PM
4

Yeah….creepy is much more than just “unattractive”
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:44 PM
6

One specific thing that I personally see more often in women than in men can overlap between creepy and toxic — and it’s the constant monitoring. Going through his phone every night to make sure he’s not texting other girls, keeping track of his likes and follows on Instagram, making sure his Snap Maps is always active so that she can always see his location…… That behavior is creepy, toxic, and honestly just bizarre to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:24 PM
4

And criminals aren’t?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 08:59 PM
0

I already said it in the comment you responded to. The Nice Guy script. Being fake-nice to women for the sole purpose of trying to sleep with them and then feeling snubbed when you find out otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 08:57 PM
0

“I guess it’s better to just be a piece of shit upfront instead of concealing it behind a fake personality?” If your image of yourself “being nice” to women is also what you consider to be your “fake personality”, this is a caricature of the Internet “nice guy”. I almost can’t even believe you followed the script so closely.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 08:28 PM
1

Yeah….society does not tell people that if they have sex, they’re a good person. I don’t know where you’re getting that from. Take this sub, for example, if a woman has ever slept with more than 5 men in her lifetime. The majority of redpillers would not be singing her praises.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 08:26 PM
2

The fact that you never watch it is 100% irrelevant lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 12:36 AM
2

Where does gay porn fit into that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 12:29 AM
2

You are just an adorable little caricature, aren’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 05:43 PM
4

The only “excuse” anyone needs to leave a relationship is that they don’t want to be in that relationship anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 05:39 PM
4

You’re being facetious, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 05:31 PM
1

I genuinely have no idea what your response had to do with my comment to the OP. What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:55 PM
8

So when’s your next date with a man, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:11 PM
–

Misogyny doesn’t equal control. Power doesn’t necessarily equal control either. Power through respect is always more malleable than power through fear. It’s much harder to lead an unwilling participant. Besides, you can be a misogynist without having any power at all. Take you, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:58 PM
–

And you sound like a misogynist, but what else is new?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:18 PM
–

That’s what tight pants are for. Duh. No belt required, no puppy problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 04:21 PM
–

Why would you ever wear a belt if you don’t have to?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 03:43 PM
–

My fiancé is of the same mindset. Men who have a problem with going out with their partner dressed in sexy attire are just awash in insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 03:39 PM
–

D) None of the above I dress sexy to intimidate! Men and women alike, doesn’t matter to me. Intimidation is power and makes it easier to get what I want from people. You can make the argument that intimidation requires a certain draw of attention in the first place, sure. But the intent isn’t what you’re trying to imply.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 03:35 PM
7

Enjoying PIV ≠ orgasming from PIV
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 07:22 PM
4

Obviously she wouldn’t be a literal slut, she just acts slutty exclusively for her partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 05:20 PM
–

Yeah….you’re definitely not any sort of content creator if you think that you can make money on Twitch by doing “next to nothing”.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 05:25 AM
1

She literally stated men over 35 going for women who are 18-24. Your example doesn’t fall within those parameters.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:05 PM
2

Yeah…..this isn’t what OP is talking about. An 18 year old marrying a 26 year old that she met at church isn’t the rhetoric that’s being referenced here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:15 PM
–

As adorable as the second part of your response is, I think I’ll just ignore it. As to a hookup being “just exchanging contact info for a date” — that’s not what a hookup is defined as in the typical modern sense, and I think you probably already know that. Your point is weak and your response to the original commenter was both rude and unfounded, and now you’re trying to backpedal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:34 PM
–

He says “club” and “disco” on either side of “park” and he’s putting an emphasis on women taking men home in that point. How many hookups do you know result from meeting at a park?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:48 PM
2

Before social media they’d put announcements in newspapers. Why shouldn’t people want to share their celebration?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:23 AM
4

Yeah I’m wondering about this distinction too, since it’ll change my answer. “Unsuccessful” could also just mean “no good LTRs”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 02:11 PM
3

You’re the one making the original claim that frequency of sex DOES effect labia size — can YOU back this up?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 07:28 PM
4

Frequency of sex has nothing to do with the size of the labia.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 07:14 PM
4

It’s hypocritical because they’re expecting a “pure” woman to marry them when they couldn’t remain “pure” themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 09:11 PM
6

Tell that to fucking Abbott and the rest of the “pro-life” Republicans in Texas. No exemptions for abortions past six weeks, even if the mother or the child’s life is at stake. Most women don’t even know they’re pregnant at six weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 09:10 PM
19

You literally responded to a man that brought up autism to begin with. I don’t know if you know what “literally” or “zero” means.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:43 PM
–

That’s adorable. Keep it up!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:21 PM
13

Uh, yes, you actually can. For instance, your opinions here are irrelevant to me :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 06:37 PM
17

Honestly I think pretty much everyone (myself included, if I’m being completely transparent) on PPD (and Reddit, tbf) aren’t interested in advice as much as they’re interested in just arguing with other people and seeing how validated their own opinions can be, hahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:48 PM
21

But you can say the exact same thing about men on Reddit as well. If you don’t value the opinions on a certain site, then just stop using that site.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:45 PM
12

You should be a nice person because it’s good to be a nice person, not for some sort of ulterior motive. This applies to everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:44 PM
1

Yes, I really do hate the feeling of leg hair. When it gets long enough, it tugs on my jeans and leggings and gets itchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:29 PM
6

I think it’s perfectly acceptable as long as the two of you communicate clearly about it. I think if you’re seeing other people before you’re exclusive with someone, it’s morally fine up UNTIL you have the “exclusive” conversation with a singular person. Though I would also recommend getting tested for STDs regularly if you have new sexual partners, of course. If you’re sleeping with different people and you DON’T get tested, THAT is immoral to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:48 AM
1

Man, I wonder why you were banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:45 AM
5

Is your argument that a woman should never find emotional comfort in any person or thing except for her husband? Just wanted to make sure I understood you correctly
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:34 AM
11

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and not only skin-deep. You can be beautiful without being conventionally attractive if you have a beautiful soul.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:30 AM
6

It’s unreasonable, unrealistic, and unhealthy to expect your children to abstain from sex until they’re 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:23 AM
7

You don’t stop being a parent when your kids turn 18. Ending the relationship with your child the moment they become a legal adult is still considered abandonment. So, would you also tell your children that they aren’t allowed to buy condoms either?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:12 AM
9

Totally. To be honest, I kind of get the feeling this guy doesn’t really know what he’s talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:09 AM
11

Lmao. Medicines like Advil and Pamprin are temporary fixes at a moment’s notice, not nearly as effective as hormonal birth control for heavy or painful periods. Gosh, you’re right, it would sure be awful if she got pregnant as a teenager and abandoned by her terrible father. If only there was some sort of daily medication she could take to prevent that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:56 AM
6

He literally just said “no birth control”.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:48 AM
9

Other medication such as…? Also, they’re going to have sex REGARDLESS of if they’re on birth control or not. It’s not hard for them to go to a store and find condoms — also a form of birth control, btw. If you want them to be stuck with the choice of having an abortion or raising a child before they’re ready, then sure, don’t allow them to get put on the pill. But if they choose to keep the child, it’s going to be you footing the bill for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:47 AM
10

Except birth control isn’t just for having responsible sex. What if your daughter ends up having horrible periods? Birth control can help with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:43 AM
7

IUDs are birth control……hello. Are you specifically talking about the pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:37 AM
7

No birth control? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:34 AM
-1

I think cohabitation would be okay after a single year.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 01:36 AM
10

That’s exactly what I was thinking. Doesn’t sound like a legitimate situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:23 PM
2

Gerard Butler in 300 vs. Gerard Butler in Phantom of the Opera?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 05:06 AM
7

I can’t properly answer this because I haven’t seen Road House, but I found Johnny to be super attractive in Dirty Dancing. There’s something about the sexual chemistry that professional dancers give off that’s very appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 12:23 AM
1

I’m happy to sign a prenup. I am, actually, signing a prenup.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 09:35 PM
7

If he wasn’t looking for marriage I wouldn’t have gotten into a relationship with him in the first place. In the hypothetical that he’d suddenly change his mind or something, yes, I would leave if he decided he didn’t want to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 08:18 PM
1

So not only marriages, then, but long-term relationships as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:03 PM
1

I don’t know who told you that bread is healthy, but I’ve got some bad news for you about carbs and butter.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 02:56 PM
11

In that case, no, I don’t think beauty has much at all to do with cleverness or resourcefulness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:38 AM
7

I disagree that beauty is a sign of health. There are plenty of chronically ill beautiful people and even more perfectly healthy ugly people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 05:34 AM
–

He’s a commonly known troll on the sub; I wouldn’t waste much more of your time with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:26 PM
14

As another commenter already pointed out, there was no no-fault divorce in the 50s and the pill didn’t make it but until the 60s either. Also, women initiate the majority of divorces because men just refuse to do the paperwork. It has nothing to do with being a feminist and everything to do with children having two parents in the lives, like it should be. No one wants to raise a kid on their own if they have a loving spouse to share in it with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:59 AM
13

Yeah…..women are going to want a present father for their children. I don’t see you ever having a successful marriage tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:36 AM
9

The entire point of faith — any faith — is that the concept that you’re having faith in is illogical. Otherwise, there wouldn’t be any faith to be had; you would simply know it to be true and could prove it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:39 PM
11

“Oh yes [casual sex] does for Women. It's terrible for them long-term, and not to be crude even worse if they are on the pill and allowing sperm to enter. That's very bad for a Woman.” This you? Because if it is, maybe you aren’t exactly versed in saying what’s healthy for a woman and what isn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:21 PM
9

Oh, so you’re just trolling. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:11 PM
7

Ah, then if we’re not talking about you, then all of your puritanical Christian points in the comments are moot. After all, not every man still in the game is religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:04 PM
9

But you said you’re already married. And, shockingly, 38. So why is this something you’re even worried about if you don’t have to navigate it in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 04:55 PM
20

Uh….yeah. 90% of your OP is your personal opinion, not fact. Scratch that, make it 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 04:46 PM
19

This debate is presented in bad faith from the very beginning. You don’t seem willing to consider any opposing views, so what’s the point of debating?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 04:41 PM
8

You implied it wasn’t when you said “where did they get the idea that promiscuous sex was pleasurable”. That’s probably where they got the idea. Because sex is pleasurable regardless of it’s form as long as it’s consensual between two adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 04:28 PM
12

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 03:51 PM
11

Casual sex doesn’t either
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 03:47 PM
6

Dildos pale in comparison to real dick
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 03:42 PM
4

Because sex is pleasurable. Hello.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 03:40 PM
2

It’s really not all that uncommon of a preference when you aren’t chronically online
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 03:36 PM
4

You’ll have to ask her
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:55 PM
15

Because she doesn’t trust you to date any of them lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:18 PM
1

I mean, they would ask me when my shift ended, etc. — I feel like that goes a little farther than harmless flirting
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:21 PM
18

When I worked as a waitress at a bar, I had all kinds of married men try to cheat on their wives with me. Disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:11 AM
0

What are you trying to contribute here?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 07:09 PM
8

It’s not misogynistic to have preferences; date whomever you want. It is misogynistic to shame/make derogatory comments about women who have more sex than you personally want her to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:05 PM
2

And then when you start to care less about casual sex and more about getting into a long-term relationship, everyone’s going to already know to stay away from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 02:22 AM
3

It doesn’t matter where you live, because you’re arguing OP’s case. It matters where OP lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 08:46 PM
6

Almost 90 percent of people in the US have sex before they get married. This is the great majority of people. So, yeah, most people who are 30+ are not virgins by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 07:21 PM
15

Because if you’re an attractive guy with good social skills, you most likely won’t still be a virgin at 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 07:08 PM
3

Mmm, I feel like you really haven’t read anything I’ve actually said.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 06:06 PM
3

Where are we even talking about men rejecting women here? The topic is on women rejecting men for their inexperience. Women who have slept with 2+ men are going to be able to tell when a man is a virgin or not. That is the point I am making.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 06:03 PM
5

Not a virgin ≠ “ran through”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:41 PM
4

Yep, you answered for me!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:41 PM
10

Just because an older man is inexperienced doesn’t mean that he has to exclusively go after younger women or women who are virgins — we agree on that. BUT, I do think it’s pretty obvious even before sex if a man is a virgin or not. Even something like simple makeout sessions can give that kind of insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 04:46 PM
–

Do you think critically about every purchase you make? I don’t think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 02:00 PM
–

You’re not getting it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 01:56 PM
–

Nope. It’s not the most important thing in dating as a whole. Not in my opinion. ETA: For example, if I go on a first date with you because I think you’re super attractive, and I find out that you’re actually an asshole, I won’t be going on a second date no matter how attractive you may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 11:39 PM
–

I don’t think it’s the most important thing in dating. I do believe, however, that it’s the number one thing that will attract someone enough to want to go for a second date. Basically, I’m saying that it’s the most important thing for primary attraction, but I think different things take it’s place after the second date (being a good conversationalist, wanting the same goals in life, etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 11:05 PM
31

If you’re not sure what benefits you get in an LTR, then don’t get into one. Stay single. It seems like a simple solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 04:13 PM
1

No, I wouldn’t date anyone that uses drugs. I’m fine with alcohol, but only on occasion — like on New Year’s Eve or at a dinner party or what have you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 08:26 PM
1

Lol. That was a pretty quick fold.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 04:48 PM
2

You literally said “This is why [women] care about a clean house and the men don’t.”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 04:45 PM
2

So not only are you just blatantly wrong, you’re also insulting your fellow man by saying that they don’t care whether or not their place is clean. Lol. I’m sure several men here would beg to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 04:34 PM
8

I think also that a lot of men are confident that they can defend themselves properly in a violent situation, so they aren’t as scared of the potential. Women are less confident that they can defend themselves, simply because men are stronger and just physically larger on average — and it’s usually a man that’s violent against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 04:03 PM
3

AIs literally cannot provide human connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 09:00 PM
-2

I did. Did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 07:15 PM
-8

It’s not a different action, and it’s completely asinine to claim that it is. Your example doesn’t even make sense. Women who like to sleep with women are also called “homosexuals”, just as men who like to sleep with men are “homosexuals”. The term applies to sleeping with the same sex as yourself — it has nothing to do with “sleeping with men” or “sleeping with women” specific to gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:36 PM
34

Humans want human connection. It’s hardwired into us. No advancement of AI can replace having a relationship with an actual human, regardless of how much incels/femcels might want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:31 PM
-10

It is quite literally the same thing. Is the woman having sex with several men? Yes. Is the man having sex with several women? Yes. How is this not the exact same action?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:18 PM
-5

My issue is the blatant hypocrisy. The commenter wasn’t only speaking on “value in the dating market” — he actually looks down on women that have casual sex. He used the term “low quality” to describe them, which is different than “low value” — even though these women’s only shared sin is doing the exact same thing he’s doing. If that makes them low quality, then he’s low quality as well. It doesn’t make him better than them simply because he’s a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:17 PM
-2

But aren’t you doing the exact same thing by practicing casual sex? Thus, you’d also have to consider yourself low quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:42 PM
3

Typical that misogynists can’t take any accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 11:34 PM
19

You didn’t answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 01:27 AM
–

You’ve got enough advice in this thread already.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 06:49 PM
–

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 06:46 PM
–

If you just want love, then why not look for women lower than 10/10?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 06:41 PM
–

This will probably be unpopular, but unless you were born with great facial structure and good muscle genetics, you probably won’t get to be a 10/10 regardless of what you improve on. Plus, everyone rates themselves higher than what they actually are. I wouldn’t really bank on you being a 6.5 on a general scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 06:39 PM
–

You want a YouTube channel to make a business?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 06:37 PM
–

It seems OP IS strictly talking about looks, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 06:36 PM
–

I mean, yeah, courage is attractive in a relationship, but courage alone won’t get you very far in the primary attraction stage. Don’t bother with a YouTube channel.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 05:58 PM
–

Lol. So, essentially, you can’t offer anything in terms of primary attraction. It does track that you’re 23, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 05:39 PM
–

Sorry if it wasn’t clear, I’m trying to tell you that, most likely, you will not achieve it. But I’ll play along — what do you believe you can offer a 10/10 woman? And, when you say 10/10, are you talking about looks exclusively, or an overall 10/10?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 05:26 PM
–

If they approach respectfully and not in a weird way, women can usually admire the courage at the very least. But no, I’ve never thought “Wow, he must be something” just because a man has had the stones to approach me. I’m appreciative for the compliment, but never stunned. Please. Do not “pretend to be famous”. No one will buy it, and you’ll look like an ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 05:20 PM
–

To be clear, you’re asking how an average — and average, on a scale of 1-10, rests at 5 — an AVERAGE person at 5/10 can obtain a PERFECT partner at 10/10? And not only obtain them — you even said that the 10/10 person would be the one that chases! You’re dreaming, honestly. Why would anyone decide to chase someone who is half as good as them?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 05:08 PM
5

nobody is demonizing you slut hmmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 03:42 PM
3

OP hasn’t said a word to me, so I’m not sure what you mean by that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 07:51 PM
4

I think we just disagree on the concept as a whole, then, and nothing productive can come from discussing it further.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 07:39 PM
8

Of course it is. It’s both done together and given to one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 07:38 PM
11

OP’s point literally states “a woman loves a man based on what the man provides”. Or is sex not something that a partner provides for their significant other?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 07:10 PM
9

I never said it was one-sided? My point was that OP, specifically, would like a woman that is willing to have sex with him on a regular basis. Of course women also look for men that are going to have sex with them on a regular basis as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 06:45 PM
38

People choose to commit to relationships based on what each party can provide. That’s not a gender-based thing. If a woman said she wasn’t intending to have regular sex with you, for instance, you likely wouldn’t choose her as a partner either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:59 PM
3

Ooooh, we’ve got a badass over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 03:40 PM
15

Passport bros don’t think about the foreign women they’re marrying — they only think about themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:47 AM
–

You really tried lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 09:54 PM
–

What is the point you’re trying to make in response to my comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 08:11 PM
–

Yikes!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 07:48 PM
–

I mean until OP actually answers we just have to sit on our hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 07:45 PM
–

Actually, can you explain what you mean by “especially if you are a man dating a woman”? Why is it worse if a man is bisexual than if a woman is bisexual in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 07:30 PM
–

I mean, on the flip side, why would you want to be with someone that wouldn’t accept who you are in the first place? If you’re bisexual (and I don’t get your “especially” here, tbf) you deserve to be with someone you won’t be afraid to come out to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 07:30 PM
3

Bwahahaha. Where have I blamed men, at all, for anything, in whatever I’ve said? Please point it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 10:06 PM
6

You can’t tell me it’s garbage when I’m telling you it is ACTUALLY the reason I’m into CNC lol. I already said that I can only speak from my own experience and viewpoint, but I can and do pinpoint that as the reason I’m into it. It gives me an out from shame. ETA: and it DOES explain about Muslim women who are blamed for their rapes — because even if they’re blamed for it, IT STILL ISN’T THEIR FAULT.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 08:38 PM
5

SMACK DOWN
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 06:44 PM
4

He’s leaving irrelevant comments all over this post. Don’t mind him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 06:43 PM
5

What is the point of your comment here?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 06:30 PM
7

I don’t mind admitting that I’m one of these women who are into CNC. Now, I don’t really care to watch porn, but I do enjoy reading raunchy romance/erotica that occasionally has elements of CNC. I think I have two main thoughts about why this may be — but of course, I can only speak for myself and my own point of view. The first is that a lot of women, including myself, have been both shamed (and, thus, ashamed themselves) of being sexual beings and having sexual urges. With CNC, there isn’t any…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 04:32 PM
28

I guess you mean the average single man?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 12:41 PM
5

I like wearing makeup and I like how fun it can be to apply it. I do think it makes me look prettier. What I DON’T like is that for women who choose not to wear makeup, they’re labeled “unprofessional” in the workplace and “sick” or “tired” in social circles. Just for showing their normal faces. I like makeup, I don’t like society’s reaction to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 08:42 PM
3

I get the feeling you’ll live
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 08:59 PM
3

I’m 25. I wouldn’t date anyone below 25, and I probably wouldn’t date anyone older than 35 unless they really knocked my socks off. But the 25 is a pretty hard limit for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 07:29 PM
–

No, PPD isn’t representative of all of the men who struggle with dating. But the commenter said “Most of the men here”. That’s PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 06:25 PM
1

This isn’t really an argument. You risk STDs/STIs any time you have sex with a new partner. I don’t really know why you’re singling cunnilingus out. Also, most men that carry HPV are symptomless — the dangers for cancer caused by HPV are much higher for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 06:13 PM
–

Oh yes, if we’ve seen any displays of niceness towards women, it’s among the men/commenters in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 05:40 PM
–

They think it’s the biggest insult you can give to a woman. It isn’t, of course, but to incels, being fat is the worst thing a woman can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 01:57 PM
5

What an adorable view you just gave! You did so good. Proud of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 01:49 PM
12

Are you actually open to having your view changed about this? Because your post seems unnecessarily aggressive for no reason with your descriptor of the women in this hypothetical situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 12:45 AM
0

Not personally, but I watched my parents go through a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 12:35 PM
1

Yeesh, I’m sorry for whatever happened to make you so negative and jaded about love.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 05:51 PM
4

What works for you doesn’t always work for other people, and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 05:36 PM
1

I’m happy to break down the parts that were confusing or hard to get through for you if you’ll tell me what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 01:43 PM
2

No, I don’t think it does. I do think it promotes the idea that women are sexual beings just like men are. But sex objects? Absolutely not. That implies the removal of their autonomy, and sex workers still have autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 01:40 PM
9

Of course it’s empowering. These people are making money solely off the fact that other people think they’re hot. Posting pictures of yourself on Instagram (yes, even scantily-clad pictures) does not mean that you’re self-objectifying, it means that you’re creating content that people want to see. There isn’t any difference in it than YouTubers or Twitch streamers who promote themselves on their respective mediums. Even taking OF into account, it’s providing an in-demand service, not selling you…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/23 05:24 AM
0

Lol — which part are you claiming isn’t true?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 12:18 AM
1

The majority of women can’t have an orgasm from penetration alone, and also, it’s more about girth than length. The vaginal canal is only so long before you hit the cervix.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 11:18 PM
2

Lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 01:45 PM
2

Speak for your fucking self, bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 01:30 PM
1

I didn’t say genetics didn’t play a part. But it’s not “all about genetics” as the commenter suggested.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 06:51 PM
5

Probably join a sitcom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 04:48 PM
5

I’m not talking about people who only go to the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 04:40 PM
18

It’s laughable to imply that some men are only unattractive because of their genetics and not because of a lack of effort on their part.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 04:02 PM
5

This seems pretty sad to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 03:52 PM
2

Yeah right, fuck that noise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 01:06 PM
1

You’re 40 and you only date 18-25 year olds? Lmao sure Jan
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 04:55 AM
1

Oh, sorry for misunderstanding that point then. Still, I think you’re just holding yourself back by not mentioning it. Do whatever you want, of course, that’s just what I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:59 PM
2

I mean, sure, don’t spend 10 hours talking about it. But five minutes would be fine. In my opinion, by not even mentioning those “unacceptable” enjoyments, you’re missing an opportunity to find potential common interests. Wouldn’t you want to know if your date was also into programming?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:55 PM
0

So when you’re on a date with a woman, do you just not discuss your hobbies because you automatically assume she wouldn’t be interested?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:44 PM
-1

I game all the time AND stream on Twitch, so I don’t really know what kind of “gotcha” you were going for here, but it was kind of a weird assumption to make. If I mentioned my affinity for HTML, would you make fun of me for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:39 PM
4

And that’s fair too. If this hypothetical date only wants sex, then we’re clearly not compatible and he can look elsewhere. More power to the guy. I’m not saying that’s wrong in general, it’s just wrong for me. I said I would be put off about experiencing sexual pressure from a date and someone else started arguing with me about it. But it doesn’t mean I have a problem with men looking for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:03 PM
4

That’s not my problem, that’s his problem. All I can do is express my boundaries and ask that he not overstep them. If he can’t follow that because of his own insecurities due to his past romantic interactions, then that’s his own fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:53 PM
2

That’s damn right. I really valued a potential partner that would take things at my own sexual pace rather than pressuring me. If he was to start a conversation with me about it, then of course I’d be open to discussing sex — but the moment he starts disrespecting my boundaries, he’s out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:31 PM
4

Similar interests are a huge part in finding a compatible partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:23 PM
4

Agreed. I would feel super put off if I was dating around and ended up going out with a guy that was “touchy-feely” and felt it was appropriate to “escalate” towards sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:22 PM
1

Fair enough!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 08:52 PM
2

I don’t know. To me, your whole premise here is just baseless. It’ll be interesting to see what other commenters think.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 07:31 PM
2

If they had the mentality of finding your group annoying, why would they hold conversations with you all in the first place? Even to go so far as to ask you for a drink? That doesn’t really make any sense. Also, do you want to address the second part of my original comment as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 07:25 PM
2

I’m just going to repeat my comment from when you posted this last time: it kind of seems like you were just more interested in the second woman if the only difference between the two is that the first woman directly asked you to buy her a drink. I also have NO idea what your situation has to do with “American women hating men”. Why even include that in this context? I don’t understand. Which woman in this situation hated you or another man?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 07:13 PM
2

Yeah, I think it’s definitely less of a “which sex is more willing to make bisexual choices” situation and much more of a “which sex is more auto-homophobic”situation
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 07:09 PM
3

As a straight woman, hot woman every time if “neither” isn’t an option as you stated in the post. At least I wouldn’t potentially have nightmares about making out with someone hot, lol. I think making out with a guy as disgusting as you describe would be one of those things that haunts me at night just due to sheer unpleasantness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 06:58 PM
1

Why’d you delete the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 06:53 PM
3

Er, it kind of just sounds like you personally were more interested in the second woman that approached you. Is the only difference that you’re suggesting here the idea that the first girl directly asked you if you would buy her a drink?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 06:41 PM
2

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 03:55 PM
1

How do you figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:08 PM
0

On the contrary, as a straight woman I am also not attracted to women of any kind :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:08 PM
2

You can’t “no true Scotsman” your way into a point here. Those bitter men who claim redpill on Reddit are still a part of the redpill community.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 04:46 AM
1

Really? Because it doesn’t seem like they speak fondly of them….ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 03:23 AM
6

The difference in women isn’t what is upsetting, it’s the fact that you as a redpill man would go along with both of those women eagerly while simultaneously shaming one and praising the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 11:02 PM
8

No, it sure doesn’t. Which is why that kind of mindset is not only really stupid, but also actually unsustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:45 PM
8

And that’s the flaw — redpill men want to sleep around with women, but they don’t want women to sleep around. But if redpill men are sleeping around, who exactly are they sleeping around with?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:25 PM
5

Then in that case, do I have a solution for you: don’t marry a teacher. But if you knowingly marry someone that puts a full 40+ hours in, works hard, and still makes significantly less money than you, and you still aren’t willing to split expenses based on a percentage of income, that makes you a bad partner. You CHOSE that marriage knowing your partner’s profession and salary. That’s your own fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 07:14 PM
5

That’s good, considering I don’t believe in gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:59 PM
6

It makes much more sense in a long-term relationship to divide expenses by a certain percentage based on each partner’s income. For both sexes, and even outside of finances, being unwilling to give more than 50% in a relationship isn’t being a good partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:38 PM
4

I can’t believe I’ve finally met the most rational person on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:23 PM
9

That’s fine, they’re free to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 06:03 PM
10

“Why would a woman be happier with a red-pilled man versus a blue-pilled one?” “For what reasons is life with a red-pilled man simply better than life with a blue-pilled man?” They wouldn’t, and it isn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 05:55 PM
3

Maybe some self-exploration is needed to figure out why you find the majority of women unattractive is all I’m saying
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 12:11 AM
4

I think you might just be gay dude
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 12:08 AM
1

LMAO no, you’re right, that’s a totally solid and reasonable thing to say
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 12:04 AM
1

I don’t really understand the point you’re trying to make here. You really don’t think that lesbian women don’t marry men due to bigotry? You are pulling an example of one lesbian woman and using her as material to defend…what, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 07:32 PM
7

Have you ever heard of a tailor?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 07:28 PM
12

Okay? What’s your point? Plenty of gay men have married women too. The phenomenon is so common that’s they’re called “beards”.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 07:16 PM
2

I disagree that female humans choose a reproductive partner with very little regard to looks. Even if we’re speaking from a purely evolutionary mindset — which I don’t believe is the only thing that applies to human attraction, mind you — women choose men based on protective and provisional traits. These traits are typically correlated with objective attractiveness, i.e. big muscles, height, strong jaw, strong chin, broad shoulders, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:49 PM
1

Certainly. Thanks for being open to explanation!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:44 PM
1

Yes, biological men and women are included in those preferences, but pansexuals don’t only base their preferences on biological sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:32 PM
0

No, bisexuals are people that are willing to have sex with those who identify as male or female, pansexuals are people that are willing to have sex with people of any gender identity, like agender or nonbinary people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:21 PM
5

You’re very welcome to link to those studies. Now, I wouldn’t be surprised if you told me that the majority of hypersexual people identify as bisexual or pansexual. But claiming that everyone that identifies as bisexual is hypersexual? No, that simply isn’t true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 05:05 PM
3

Lmfao, what? Bisexuality is not “just hypersexuality”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 04:58 PM
28

Are you just going to ignore the bi women that cheat on men with other women, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 04:37 PM
8

But that’s your own personal rating. She rates herself at an 8, for example, and this commenter also seems to consider her an 8. From this anecdote, it would seem that she IS accurately rating herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 04:12 PM
3

Agreed, eyeliner can look good on a loooooot of people regardless of gender!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 04:04 PM
6

Are you sincerely looking to have your view changed? Because your post is marked as a CMV, but this comment alone doesn’t really indicate any willingness to budge.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 04:02 PM
19

Overall I’d contest your claim with the simple statement that more men find women more attractive than more women find men. Based on that alone, women are objectively more attractive than men and it isn’t misandry to look at it as such. But I want to specifically address point number two because there are several things wrong with it. Women can find other women attractive and not be bisexual. On top of that, just because a bisexual woman ends up in a relationship with a man doesn’t mean that she…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 03:45 PM
3

Nope, I really don’t care how much sex you’ve had and it certainly doesn’t make you an expert at anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 05:28 PM
2

You reeeaaaally aren’t helping your case here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 05:08 PM
5

This is not even remotely the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 04:32 PM
4

It’s also hilarious how he had to give a little mini-lesson about condoms at the end of that comment, like nobody but him has ever experienced safe sex on THAT level before. It’s kind of just a gross comment all around tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 04:11 PM
19

Lol! I take back my props; you’re really overthinking my comment. No need to get all emotional here, nobody was trying to guilt trip you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 04:04 PM
8

Uh, yeah, I did. That’s why I said you had admitted equal fault? That’s what that sentence implies.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 03:55 PM
6

Oh yes, and I’m sure he was being 100% totally and completely honest about those numbers too. 50 girls by age 21 seems PERFECTLY reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 03:54 PM
8

I mean, at least you can admit you’re also equally at fault for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 03:42 PM
18

I don’t really understand what you’re contesting with this comment. My point was that the possibility of pregnancy is always scary, regardless of what kind/how many forms of birth control you use. Or is it hormonal birth control in particular that you have a problem with?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 03:01 PM
6

Care to explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 02:48 PM
75

It’s kind of seems like your headline question and the scenario in your post are talking about two different (albeit related) things. But to answer your question, I’ve been with my fiancé for six years, on birth control, and I still get nervous when it’s time for my period every month. I DO NOT want to get pregnant. I can’t imagine that this anxiety is only used as a “gotcha” by other women considering just how much a pregnancy can affect someone’s life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 01:55 PM
2

I mean, you don’t have to approach anyone if you aren’t feeling up to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:14 PM
3

I think it’s generally accepted that anyone would become objectively more attractive if they consistently work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 04:02 PM
1

Lol calm down. I wasn’t talking about hobbies. I meant, what do they have in common as life partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 04:08 AM
2

They’re at TOTALLY different states in their lives. A 20 year old is in the middle of college. A 40 year old has been developing a career for 15 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 10:28 PM
3

Where the hell is the debate in this
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:55 PM
4

I don’t think this answers a single one of the questions I posed lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:53 PM
15

It seems like this post is set up as some sort of “gotcha” — why can’t both be true? And if both are true, then where is your argument? My main thought about an age gap: what the hell is a 35-40+ year old going to have in common with someone who is 18-22?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:46 PM
2

I mean, okay, we can disagree on what “inexperienced” is and have your question still apply. Let’s say “inexperienced” means “virgin”, then. I wouldn’t be comfortable dating a virgin, I don’t think. Teaching somebody about all of sex is just a responsibility that I don’t really care to take on. There’s always an element of learning about each other’s sexual preferences with every new partner, of course, but virgins won’t know ANYTHING about what they like and don’t like, and I don’t really think…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 03:31 AM
4

I disagree. For instance, if you’ve slept with one person, you aren’t a virgin, but I would say you’re still inexperienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 03:10 AM
1

It depends on what your definition of “inexperienced” means. Do you mean “virgin”?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 02:48 AM
-1

“The worth and cost is decided by you. You might decide you’re worth a handsome man who makes 6 figures, owns a mansion and 3 business who will pamper you, but being realistic might decide you’ll cost a man with a stable job, and a house. The value is when that man comes along and decides a whether or not he is willing to “pay” those things for what you have to offer which is completely out of your control. Now what some people will do is lower their cost but the problem with this is when you lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 01:00 AM
4

It’s cool! I’m working on raising that number a bit in the kitchen and the gym currently hahaha. I’m hell-bent on catching up to him!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 09:42 PM
9

Whatever, he’s a perfect 10 to me but I was trying to be modest about it lmfao But now that you’re here, yeah, he’s a 10 for sure
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 09:30 PM
10

That’s why I said “generally” lol my boyfriend is a 9 and I’m like a 6
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 08:53 PM
27

Shared major values Sense of humor (not afraid to be silly) Generally same level of attractiveness I believe I meet all of these qualities, number 1 being basically inevitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 05:41 PM
2

Idk what to tell you. Take it up with the OP if you’re so concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:19 PM
2

You can’t downvote in this sub, it isn’t an option.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:15 PM
2

I sure do. And TBP. But that doesn’t mean I’m involved in either of those subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:14 PM
3

I’m talking about the post I commented on, haha. That’s all I was really concerned about when I commented.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:13 PM
2

Okay. I don’t really give a shit one way or the other. My original response was in reference to OP’s post and how he defines “the wall”, and if you disagree or have some other version of it, feel free.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:09 PM
3

Personally, I’m totally cool with that. I didn’t even hear about “The Wall” as a concept until right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:02 PM
8

Well, when you’re ready to join us in the conversation that this post is actually generating, we’ll all be right here. Until then, you’re free to go back to TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 10:52 PM
3

It’s seems like OP’s post is talking about physical attractiveness, not fertility. He even says in the post that he defines “the wall” at the life stage in which looks depreciate. The only person tying this subject solely to fertility right now is you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 10:48 PM
3

I saw that you think you have no wall. How interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 10:41 PM
1

I think I’d agree for the most part. I’d give a little more room for those ages though, if we’re basing things solely on physical attractiveness. I’d say women “hit the wall” at around 35 and men do so at around 48-49. But there are always exceptions to the rule, certainly, and that isn’t to say that people that are older than those ages aren’t attractive by any means. ETA: Anyone that claims they have “no wall” are full of shit imo
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 10:30 PM
3

Oh, okay. So you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. Anyways, I answered your question. Do with that information whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 10:38 PM
3

Oh? Do you have a source for that 99%?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 10:20 PM
2

Certainly. In fact, menopause (which happens around 55 or so) can give women an even higher sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 10:17 PM
6

Of course women who want that much sex exist. Plenty of women have very high sex drives.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 09:52 PM
4

I believe I’ve been very clear from the start as to which evidence you should link. It’s not my problem if you can’t actually find any. Maybe you should think long and hard about why that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:34 AM
3

So then link your sources that back up your claim. Since you’re clearly so confident. I want to see a legitimate study that provides evidence that psychopaths exist because some women find them attractive. I don’t mind waiting. And please don’t link an article about evolution, either. That isn’t what I’m interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:31 AM
9

No no, your claim is not “are some women attracted to psychopaths”. You are claiming “psychopaths exist because some women are attracted to them”.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:04 AM
4

You could link them, since you’re making the claim and all
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 03:57 AM
5

Personal anecdotes are useless here
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 03:53 AM
1

Lmfao, okay, sure man
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 03:46 AM
12

But let me guess, you would supposedly be one of the “good” choices?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 03:41 AM
35

Should this post really be considered a CMV if OP literally said “I don’t think this should even be a debate”? If you don’t think it should be a debate, then why post in “r/PurplePillDebate”?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 03:36 AM
4

It wouldn’t be concerning that he was a virgin until his 20s necessarily, but I would want to know the reasons as to why it took so long and also the reasons that he suddenly started hitting it off with women at 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 11:25 PM
1

I don’t see anything wrong with online dating. I personally know three couples that have not only had successful relationships from OLD, but two of those couples are actually married now. The bar scenario is a little more uninteresting, because I really don’t think people go to bars to find dates anymore. I think that’s kind of becoming a thing of the past. Hookup culture is not my thing AT ALL, but if people want to stay mutually casual with everyone they meet, more power to them. I just think …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 12:42 PM
2

Is this CMV geared more towards hookups or is it geared more towards relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 03:39 AM
2

I bet it tasted better than your cum, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 03:24 AM
2

Okay. Now what?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 01:15 AM
7

Oh yes, after all, everyone knows that the reasons for divorce can never be the man’s fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 01:08 AM
2

A ton of people, men and women, reeeeeaaaaally don’t give a shit about body count. The sooner you learn this, the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 12:56 AM
1

I don’t have children and I don’t plan to have children, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 08:37 PM
7

Yeah, he marked this post as a CMV but it’s pretty clear he has no interest in actually changing his view about this, even a little bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:29 PM
1

Sure, no stopping you there. Do whatever you want. Your marital and sexual choices are wholly up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:30 PM
15

And that’s where I think you’re struggling with this idea — men can have GOOD reasons to get married that are intangible. Just because they aren’t “tangible” doesn’t mean they aren’t worthy reasons. It’s not a true scope of “What TRULY is the point of marriage for men?” if you just discard a good amount of married men’s reasons right out of the gate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:28 PM
-2

Oh yes, how dare people choose what to do with their own bodies. Somebody should put a stop to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:24 PM
15

Then you don’t really care about why the modern man gets married, I don’t think. Do you put marriage vows under that list of “fluffy attributes” as well? Mental health? The sense of being part of a lifelong team?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:20 PM
0

Thank GOD secularism overtook those traditional Christian values in modern society. I don’t know where society would be if we only stuck with what we knew in 1949.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 03:18 PM
47

I mean, if you just see real reasons that men get married as “fluffy attributes” and “‘benefits’” that deserve quotation marks for some reason (?) then are you really interested in what the point in marriage is for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 02:56 PM
1

Because there isn’t any implication that there is something wrong with him. The only thing that OP wrote about her colleague’s new boyfriend is that he’s hot and that he started dating her colleague. Now please kindly answer the question that I asked you first.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 08:33 PM
1

But where are you getting that from in this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 08:29 PM
1

Well then that’s exactly what I was asking. Why are you suggesting that something might be wrong with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 08:27 PM
1

Assholes of every gender do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 08:25 PM
1

My mistake, then, if you weren’t implying that. I just don’t know why you included those things in your post at all if you weren’t suggesting something was wrong with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 08:23 PM
2

Wait I’m confused — why does this girl’s new boyfriend need to be stupid, or gay, or have PE? He can’t just be a regular guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 08:18 PM
13

Honestly it seems like you both kind of suck. Like you obviously both aren’t great colleagues to this person. Good for her for finding someone who thinks of her as more than just a “backup”.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 07:40 PM
1

I told you want I want. Feel free to re-read my last comment if you need a refresher.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:53 PM
2

So, you can’t, in short.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:47 PM
2

Can you link to the study? Specifically, can you quote the statistics you’re referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:45 PM
1

Considering reading all 187 comments, including your own, OP, I’ve become convinced that you aren’t even open to having your view changed at all, especially when taking your second edit into account. Why bother posting?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:41 PM
2

You didn’t say that. You said “constantly in conversations”, which is anecdotal. How many men did she interview that also said they settled for their partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:36 PM
2

Oh yeah, let’s just keep an eye out for a pig with wings while we’re at it!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:20 PM
2

Well then, I wish you luck. Your standards are near impossible depending on your age and your attitude towards women probably isn’t winning you any favors, so it’ll probably be a bit of a challenge for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:11 PM
-1

How can it mean that 51% of men ages 18-29 are single if only 7% of the entire adult population is single? That doesn’t make any sense. The statistics are saying that of that 7%, 51% of single men are aged 18-29. Do you really not know how statistics works?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:10 PM
2

You ARE a virgin? Do you realize that the older you get, the slimmer chances you’ll have of finding ANY other partner regardless of gender that is also a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:05 PM
4

You’ve already ratted on yourself saying virginity is ideal. You’d prefer if your partner didn’t sleep with ANYONE in the past. Unless you yourself are a virgin, that is a baseless, shallow preference based only on the concept of “purity” and being “unsullied”.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 11:01 PM
0

They’re 51% more likely to be single out of that entire 7% of the adult population. And that doesn’t include factoring in the 26% of adults that are CHOOSING to be single. So you’d still be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:57 PM
2

If we’re only going off of anecdotal evidence, then we might as well equally say it never happens at all, considering I’ve never once heard anyone mention in conversation that they settled for their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:48 PM
2

I was going to bring up porn with this post, but I didn’t quite know how to do it. Thank you for at least mentioning it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:46 PM
3

So, your 90% isn’t actually backed by anything firm. Where do you draw the line, if you don’t mind? For instance, what if the only people a woman has slept with were actual relationship partners instead of casual flings, but that number just exceeds yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:44 PM
1

But according to the Pew Research Center, only 7% of all American adults are not married or in a committed relationship, but they’re actively looking for romantic partners. Seven percent. Meanwhile, 68% ARE in relationships, while a leftover 26% are not in relationships and are also NOT looking for a romantic partner. So, your claim that “most average guys never receive any attention from women including average women” is just blatantly wrong. How can that be true if at least 68% of them are in …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:39 PM
2

Are you really arguing in good faith here? Where are you seeing that women are constantly reminding people that they “settled” for their partner — especially as often as making a blanket generalization for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:24 PM
2

Not exactly. It might be more appropriate to say that women don’t find the majority of men they know attractive, which could be possible that you’ve heard that before and choose to believe so. But there’s — what — 7 billion people on the planet? Half that is 3.5 billion. My point is that no single person knows even 51% of 3.5 billion people, so the claim “Women don’t find the majority of men attractive” or even vice versa is not an appropriate claim for anyone to be making.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:20 PM
6

But that’s not what the comment said. In fact, the comment said absolutely nothing about attraction. The comment said that 90% of women either just want to sleep with a man or they think they have a “God-given right to marry up and be provided for”. I don’t think 90% of women only want to sleep around or marry rich. Those aren’t the only two options, or else women wouldn’t be in long-term relationships with middle-class men, at the very least.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:17 PM
5

I got an email that you responded to me but I can’t see your response in the comments. Apparently it’s a common bug. Could you please respond again to this comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:13 PM
3

I’d argue that neither gender finds the “majority” of one gender attractive, regardless if it’s same-sex or opposite-sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:04 PM
5

Where are you getting this 90% number? Also, you say you want someone that hasn’t slept around — but isn’t that a shallow qualification in itself? Barring sexual infections, why do the number of people your partner has slept with matter to you if not for purely shallow reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:03 PM
1

Your Point #3 isn’t a legitimate point as much as it is your personal opinion. Edit: to clarify, I mean your second Point #3 that refers to “Chad-Chasing”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 09:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter