TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sourneck Archive

View 1 posts and 191 comments by sourneck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Feminismsourneck/r/MensRights23/10/22 10:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's a great idea, I'm sure it will work wonderfully, just like how conversion therapy works wonderfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 12:51 PM
8

It would be about dating to get into that relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:27 PM
6

A woman becomes meaningfully more attractive to me if I have gotten to know her, if I like her and connect with her. I think the vast majority of men here can agree with this. I've been very attracted to women who are beautiful and whom I like. Do I have a chance with them? Hell no. But I don't "gaslight myself into thinking I prefer someone less attractive". I've said this to another woman here recently, who believed men only want a hot woman: The woman of my dreams was a solid 6/10 (unfortunat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 02:45 PM
1

it communicates that you probably don't have many options, meaning you must be less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 01:50 PM
2

ok, we were just using the word "cancelled" differently. It is indeed an objective fact under my meaning, but I understand that you see the term differently. If you want to tell me why I should use your meaning instead of my own, I'd be interested in your point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:31 AM
2

It is an objective fact that celebs have been cancelled for liking/endorsing Trump. Saying some would get cancelled does not mean that all or even most would
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 09:06 PM
10

Understatement of the century. Celebrities would be cancelled for saying they like the movie lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 09:59 AM
–

It's not a debate, it's conversational. "I have had this rough experience. Has anyone else had it?"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:40 AM
–

She clearly does not care about someone else's feelings more than her own discomfort and disgust. Why on earth would you say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:38 AM
–

This has to be ragebait hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:36 AM
–

Real
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:35 AM
1

What? "Feeling that I see sexual assault" does not mean that I see sexual assault... Also, denying rape is one thing, but now you're referring to sexual assault. If you genuinely didn't even see the sexual assault... I have no words.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:21 AM
1

And if they told you they were in an aeroplane, would you argue online that they are in an aeroplane? All the people who made it are doing are not realizing it's rape, just like everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:13 PM
2

Case and point ^ I've had these conversations before. To this day, it still shocks me that I can point it out and people still refuse to see it. The weird part is it's actually women who seem to point it out the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 09:59 PM
2

case and point ^^
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:54 PM
1

I'm glad you're being honest. Would be strange to be dishonest though. 'Anora' won best picture at the Oscars in 2025. It was pretty popular as far as movies go. I looked in circles of people who had watched the movie. I read a lot of discussions about it. Asked many people about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:07 PM
-1

yes... and I also mentioned The Boys in another comment. Another show where many people have criticized the way the rape of a man is portrayed. I have nothing to refute. 😩
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:02 PM
–

an IQ too high?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:59 AM
3

No it doesn't. What it erases is the idea that it's "because women are seen as less". Do you really need me to explain it again?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:56 AM
-5

Oh Jesus... No fucking shit. This is a dead point. I would explain why but "you stay in your smaller circles" indicates to me that you're not worth responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:54 AM
2

Context: the scene is of a woman raping a man. From what I gathered online, hardly anyone recognized that it was rape. From 3 extremely woke women I talked to about it irl, they didn't recognize it and even pushed back quite a bit before realizing. It didn't register with the vast majority. There are more media examples of such things, such as in The Boys. You say "they understand what consent is" with other men, yet that movie clearly shows that it is not the case. Essentially it shows that you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:50 AM
3

That scene is woman on man
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:38 AM
5

This whole idea completely falls apart when you discover that everyone, even the most woke woman you've ever known, can watch the blatant raping of a man and not even register that they've just seen a rape. Source: end scene of the movie 'Anora'
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:29 AM
–

Each to their own, but that is a strange list
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 06:27 PM
1

Ah yes I'm lying. I suppose that's the only way your whole schtick doesn't fall apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 01:45 PM
0

It's mildly concerning that you didn't realize that I was mirroring your ridiculous behavior. Instead you delve into some lore expansion about incels, groypers, and imaginary recruitment arcs. I like the idea that a partner is some kind of debate immunity badge. “I've got a partner, therefore I have no skin in the game, which is why I’m now qualified to aggressively diagnose your love life and speak on behalf of young men everywhere.” The funny part is I'm in a happy and loving relationship with…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:07 AM
-2

"The Olympics literally calls her sport 'women's ice hockey'" - enough with the pseudo-intellectual claptrap mate. We've gone from "women's sports" to a full DSM-5 diagnosis of my sex life because you couldn't defend your point. Helpful hint from a fellow dude: if every disagreement ends with you imagining the other guy is an incel neckbeard whose mere presence desiccates women, it gives off the vibe that you're less interested in being right than in hoping some random woman on Reddit notices wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:48 AM
-2

Appeal to authority (credentials), ad hominem (abusive), appeal to authority and appeal to popularity (ad populum), hasty generalization and another ad hominem. All that in only 4 sentences. I did not "whine about high school sports", or make any mention of HS and college sports, so don't try to lump me in with anyone else. I didn't make any caveat, and I didn't hate on women's sports. Women's sports are is great. One might argue that you're the one hating on women's sports; it's almost as if me…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:43 AM
-6

highest level of *women's sport. If it's a meaningful achievement you don't need to lie about what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:09 AM
–

Ok, so with 0 experience of trying these techniques you say they don't work. Awesome. I agree that you can't just copy paste a technique and have it work in any situation. But as a somewhat clingy man, I HAVE to act flaky. It's literally impossible for me to get any woman that I'm interested in by "being myself".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 08:36 PM
–

Real question is how many women have you tried to date, whilst being a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:56 PM
1

Now you are saying "worse person" but I don't even know if you mean morally worse or just worse in general. Just very confusing. Anyway I think I made myself pretty clear, so I'm done here
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:11 AM
1

Honestly, what the ever-loving fuck are you on about
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:41 PM
–

Don't bother he's restarted
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:41 PM
1

There aren't specific things that I want to look up to her in. But I can give examples. One woman I was into would never let others annoy or anger her, she'd always stay calm and resolve things well. Another, who I was in a relationship with, always understood what I was saying/feeling even when I was incoherent, the reverse of which I am terrible at. These are some qualities that I look up to and find attractive. The appeal of someone "beneath" me in some regards is that we can feel comfortable…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:31 PM
2

Oh I do, but I prefer balance personally. Ideally I'd want someone who I can look up to in some ways, and who can look up to me in others. But I definitely don't look for women who are more "virtuous" or "moral". Actually now that I think of it, I'm more comfortable dating women who I see as "beneath" me on that spectrum. Since it's generally uncomfortable being around women who are more "virtuous" or "moral" than myself. Well actually I don't see anyone as "above me" on that spectrum, so what I…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 03:44 PM
2

I can only speak for myself; hell nah
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:58 AM
1

Looks like someone did NOT see what he did there lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:56 AM
3

Wdym by that. I'm pretty awesome but I get no ladies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 08:07 PM
–

Jill: "Let's go to bed at 10" Jack: "I agree, we should do that! I'll have a shower at 11 and then head to bed." In this example, Jack has clearly misunderstood Jill, as it would make no sense to shower at 11 if he's agreeing on going to bed at 10. This shows that it is in fact possible to have a misunderstanding happen within only 2 statements. Jill makes a statement, and then Jack demonstrates his misunderstanding of that statement. But ok, let's forget OP for now. These are not senseless sema…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:00 PM
–

This is a place for constructive conversation. You and OP are talking across each other, so I'm trying to get you on the same page so you can have a meaningful conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:28 PM
–

Ok, now I'm confused. What am I wrong about exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:26 PM
–

Why would I argue that OP's assertion does not conflict with the actual definition? It DOES conflict with it. OP's entire point is that the "actual definition" is wrong. Do you think that it's stupid for OP to try to "redefine" words? Then tell him that! But you only created opposing statements in your head by combining the "actual definition" with OP's definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:22 PM
–

Ok but that is literally what I'm saying? You can argue about the definition itself, exactly the way you are attempting to do. But attempting to tackle the content of the argument whilst using different definitions is just nonsensical. This whole debate is primarily about language. OP is saying that "objectification" is being misused. He says what the word means to him. You say the "definition is wrong", suggesting that at least some words have absolute, potentially god-given definitions. I'm no…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:14 PM
–

If I say "objectification" is the human practice of running faster than the speed of light, then I can say "objectification does not exist", and I would be correct, given my definition. You could say that I'm grossly misusing language, but not that the statement itself is incorrect. If you consider that feeling bad when seeing someone getting tortured must mean that the torture victim is not being objectified by the observer (OP's view), then everyone can agree that OP is right. Because the vast…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:03 PM
–

...ok? That's supposed to change something?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 11:02 PM
–

Another demonstration of your stupidity. You're using a statement that can only be used if everyone agrees on the conclusion. Otherwise it's just complete nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 11:02 PM
–

I mean it sounds like you're a woman dating someone who prefers men
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 10:57 PM
–

Why would anyone dm you clown pics when you could just take a selfie?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 10:47 PM
–

Last I checked, suggesting a question has some kind of most common answer does not mean that you think the answerers are a monolith. You need to work on critical thinking skills if you want to engage in any kind of debate
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 10:45 PM
1

You are constantly trying to relate the basic fact to the conversation around standards. You just need to detach from that for a bit, and then once you understand it, you can link it back to what you were talking about and it will make more sense. What's funny is I actually mostly agree with you on your main points. There is stuff to discuss there, but again I can't do that if your logical framework isn't working
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 12:28 AM
-1

You have someone here disagreeing with basic reality, and the strong implication is that she doesn't quite understands what it means for something to be a motive. I don't know if she's in a position to lower her standards, but I thought the discussion was more about initial dating, so I was confused by her comment, which is why I asked for clarification. But anyway, whether she in a position to lower her standards or not has become irrelevant to me, because my primary goal here is to get her to …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 12:12 AM
0

You can't be engaging in this conversation if you don't understand the very simple facts. It is a fact that avoiding the hassle of divorce is a motive that you might one day have for lowering your standards for your husband. You can say "that motive should never be enough for anyone", you can even say "no motive should ever be enough for someone to lower their standards", and we can have a discussion about that, because maybe you're right; but it is still a motive nonetheless. There is more to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:05 PM
1

No, I'm stating facts. Having no suitors is a motive to lower your standards. You can argue that it should never be enough of a motive, but it's still a motive. So I'll ask again, are there any motives for you to lower your standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:56 PM
1

Ok, and generally, the motive to lower one's standards is failure to find suitors. Do you have anything motivating you to lower your standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:41 PM
0

Why would you be interested in lowering your standards if you're married? Lowering your standards requires some sort of countermotive, which you presumably don't have...?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:09 PM
–

Having read through your comments I imagine you must be a hideous pig yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:44 PM
1

What's a good job
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:41 PM
–

i see everyone as bigoted in much more significant ways, so not like i have much choice
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 12:40 PM
–

I don't understand the question marks. It's just not something I care about that much, is that hard to believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:48 AM
1

Are they? I am not looking for "justification", I am just wondering how they feel about it. I had no idea that so many women wouldn't be interested in such a man, so I am trying to learn more about how it makes them feel. It makes no difference to me given that I am a cis man who is only interested in cis women, it's just interesting. Perhaps you could help me understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 07:27 PM
-1

most of them don't believe they can change sex though, they only change their gender. From what you say, it doesn't seem like you really have different beliefs, but rather that you're speaking a slightly different language. In any case, isn't that such a minor thing? personally, as a cis dude who believes that people can indeed change their gender, I would not mind dating a transphobic woman. i cannot imagine it leading to "constant conflict and hurt feelings".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:37 AM
0

can you perhaps put into words what it is that bothers you about the second one?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:23 AM
–

I would say those men are still "part of society" for the purposes of that discussion, but sure if you wanna define it differently we can still do that. I'll spell it out for you by rewriting that line: "you could also say in a normal functioning society, more men are part of that society and therefore more men get dates." And whatever drives swathes of men "away from society" is, by definition, some kind of social phenomenon. You can blame porn, technology, fascism, whatever you want, but ultim…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 11:36 PM
–

you could also say in a normal functioning society more men get dates though. your argument here just seems to be "one is part of a normal functioning society whilst the other one isn't".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 10:35 PM
1

yes and the harm is that women don't like you, that's the whole point
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 09:53 AM
1

what? how?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 09:05 AM
0

i rarely see that, what i can guarantee you is that women care much more about virginity (or lack thereof) than men do, when it comes to choosing a partner
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 09:00 AM
3

being kind or good can show itself in a lack of assertiveness. a lot of women like assertiveness to the point that men are putting their own wants on a pedestal. that is not kind behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:21 PM
-2

"how men are more concerned with virgins" - what?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:17 PM
2

How so? I honestly think this is decent advice
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:27 AM
1

"Window shopping" doesn't work unless you want hookups. Literally part of the reason they complain is that they expect to be able to window shop for a relationship when that's just not how it works
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 06:07 PM
23

It's simply a fact that dating apps are incredible for women. Most just have no idea how to use them
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 04:38 PM
–

as i said, i can only speak for myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:55 PM
–

i wasn't trying to make digs about autism. I don't really know what OP's "intentions" are, they just seem unhappy with their relationship and wanted to talk about it, and they're probably a bit sexist. It's certainly not as obvious as you are trying to say it is
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:55 PM
–

I can only speak for myself: it's nothing to do with gender. it's not about effort either. what really bothers me is seeing people make negative judgements of others based on gross misinterpretation. I do also think op's question is kinda dumb, i mean obviously women are not a monolith. but it at least doesn't seem like op is trying to turn conversation sour. maybe you still think it's unfair of me to call you out on it, and i can totally understand that point of view. it's just that what you sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:51 PM
–

I try to assume good faith where possible but i cannot here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:48 AM
–

No. I agree he could have been clearer, but you gotta use some common sense here. If you are on the autism spectrum then you should just take my word for it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:38 AM
–

If you use 3% of your brain, you will understand he's not referring to the k drama bit, he's asking if all girls think about other men when sexting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 11:29 AM
2

This isn't having a backbone, it's being suspiciously stubborn. Why would one not just send a pic here
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 10:52 AM
1

Source? That seems so insane
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 09:04 AM
2

Does she prefer trans or cis women? Trans kinda makes sense to me, otherwise that seems so strange
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 12:33 PM
2

I thought OP was specifically referencing dressing skimpily to feel better about one's self. I suppose that is not explicitly mentioned, though the last sentence does seem to strongly imply it. If you agree with that, any other details are besides the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 05:24 PM
4

The equivalent is just the equivalent: man takes shirt off "for himself". You added context which turns it into a practical physical issue (uncomfortable level of heat).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:33 PM
2

Yeah I don't think that really makes sense to evaluate in many cases. Skill level and physical attributes are very closely linked. In football, for instance, no woman comes close to the top in technical skill.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:19 AM
5

Do you think the statement in the title dismisses women's experiences by definition ?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 02:15 PM
–

Cute
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 12:42 PM
2

Cute
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 02:29 PM
2

Lmao, cute
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:35 PM
1

the term "red flag" is overused, i'm pretty sure it is meant to mean "danger itself"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 03:06 AM
8

But what if one didn't tho? a lot of dudes in their 20s are struggling with that stuff. If such a 29 year old were to date a more "regular" 29 year old, would the "regular" 29 year old not be "grooming" the other one?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 03:04 AM
2

U can still care about looks despite not "offering" them. It's just a matter of how much you care about that vs how much you care about actually finding someone
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:10 PM
1

Because it just doesn't matter that much, it's worth it for the right person. I would probably never be attracted to that kind of person so it's only a hypothetical, but I promise you most dudes will have an easier time lying about it than I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 10:12 PM
1

"it's valuable because I value it" yk u don't need to answer some randos on the internet. Anyways not to scare u but if I'm super into someone who's anti porn like that, I'd definitely lie about it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 09:20 PM
0

Right I see. I think you lose the vast majority of the potential "top men" on just the porn part. Do you see/experience it that way as well? If so, how come it's so important to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:27 PM
1

Do you mean they fail at point 1 of 7? Or just that they fail one of the 7 points
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:18 PM
1

Is this ragebait?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 12:57 PM
3

No shot a man is saying this line 😭😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:03 PM
1

You ain't gonna get anywhere with nonsense like this
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:53 PM
-1

That's not what he means though. He's talking about changing through the process of natural selection. You're not dumb, why can't you just tell us what you're thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:48 PM
6

The 2 ideas compliment each other, not contradict
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:39 PM
-1

Instead of just being pedantic, at least tell us what word should be used instead of "evolve"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:38 PM
–

woman....you're dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 08:13 AM
15

Usually when you're just talking to someone one assumes some mutual respect
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 10:47 PM
1

Ok let's take this part: "Have a chiseled jawline. No, it doesn't matter to us that it's mostly genetics that determine where fat is stored on the body." Firstly, good looks is not only about having a chiseled jawline. In fact, you have no idea what this woman's standards or preferences even are. I suppose u are saying that her standards are way higher than she lets on, which may be true, but don't act like you know that. The last sentence is the real stupid part. Why would you add that? It's no…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:01 AM
8

I understand your frustrations man. And you are somewhat right about a few things, which other people don't consider. But that is mixed in with a fair bit of bullshit. In addition, the person you're responding to said nothing about whether her preferences are "morally right" or "wrong", which you seem to be implying. She was just trying to state the reality of the situation as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:39 AM
15

I don't know for sure what the reason is. But I know that I chose to act the way I did because I genuinely thought it was what would work best. It was not "delusional" or an "excuse"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 01:51 PM
1

You aren't living in reality
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:27 AM
1

If the question were real (as in the magic would actually work) then you still can't imagine. That's the whole point of the question. Would you take that gamble based on your lived experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:24 AM
3

Pretty sure they also oppose some of the parts that benefit them lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:17 PM
37

Not just looks, looks in photos 😭 where most ppl look worse imo
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 07:33 PM
1

I absolutely have to see this "proof", huge if true
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 12:43 AM
-1

As a man who was socialized to be more caring, the harm is that women have 0 interest in me unless I pretend to be less caring. This is a total disaster for my personal life. Despite having been socialized in a certain way, I'm now forcefully trying to re-socialize myself, at least in this aspect. You don't know what is nature, what is nurture, and what is an almost inevitable nurture based on nature. You also don't know what you fuck up by trying to mess with these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 12:41 AM
0

I think it's fine to call it a mystery. There are always so many unknowns in these kinds of issues. All I would say is then you have to be consistent when it comes to the other issues, and call them mysteries as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:21 PM
1

First one, check my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:54 PM
1

do you know what hate means?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 05:10 PM
0

Think you're forgetting what an insult is lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:56 PM
0

Huh? Seems like you're agreeing that the point of calling a man a virgin is insulting his ability to get laid? What I said didn't have anything to do with your first paragraph. I'm a lil confused. My point is that if women didn't care about virginity, the insult would still be used.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:45 PM
0

...No.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 12:18 PM
-2

No, p sure the main point is that he can't get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 11:19 AM
1

Maybe this is your experience, which is fine, but you don't know other people. I have multiple close female friends who I'd never date and who'd never date me either, 100%. It's very possible especially if you aren't physically attracted to the other person at all
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 07:04 AM
6

I don't think the post is about confessing feelings, it's about making any kind of move on a woman you're interested in. Asking for a number is part of that, at least in my experience
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 10:04 PM
1

I didn't call you dumb. You might be amazing at languages or something, I don't know you. You did misunderstand 1 thing, yes, and then on top of that you came to an incorrect conclusion even based on that misunderstanding, and then failed to notice any of that on your second attempt. Not sure what your point is on perspective, yes it's important to acknowledge individuals perspectives, but it's not like you're gonna tell your math teacher that your individual perspective is that 2+2=5. The scree…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 02:46 PM
4

Ok, so she said "women are disgusted by it and they make up half of the population" ==> since at least half of the population is disgusted by it, it came to be considered immoral (according to her). She has made no comment on men's view of it, besides implying through that statement that at least a significant portion of men are not disgusted by pedophilia. Already there, you could be one of the men who is disgusted by it, so the statement does not rule out that you are disgusted by it. But you …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 05:30 PM
-1

My bad, I didn't know of that study and thought u were referring to a different one. I don't know what your on about with "throwing pedophilia accusations", for one I don't even consider it an accusation because there's nothing wrong with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 05:22 PM
0

I'm sorry, I don't know how to say this nicely but if that response was earnest then that shows a severe lack of logical thinking skills, and it's probably not a good idea for you to engage in such discussions. Maybe you could learn something such as programming if you want to improve these skills naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 04:25 PM
-1

Bro go back to school lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 04:16 PM
0

Yeah but we all know really that's partly cos the study doesn't include sub-20 y/os
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 04:15 PM
1

Imagine you are like "but actually!..." 🤓🤓☝️☝️ and then you still get it totally wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 04:14 PM
6

You're not "good with sensitive" you're good with sensitive when they're also secure about themselves, decisive/assertive, and not too anxious. When U think about this U realise Ur looking for someone with few emotional problems who has still somehow developed sensitivity
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 08:10 AM
2

No, the sensitivity that they don't like is when it reveals insecurities, lack of assertiveness, and anxiety (there's probably others). I mean sure ur second paragraph is right as well but like no shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 08:03 AM
-4

Indeed, and likewise don't call all male feminists "simps" or "white knights" just cos u think their views are absurd
/r/MensRights07/05/23 09:15 PM
2

Yeah and what kinds of guys are u expecting to find in online chat rooms...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 11:21 PM
0

That was not the argument presented at all, nor the reality of any women's sport.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 06:39 PM
26

No one's assuming he didn't do it. They just think that the system is stacked against him whether he did it or not.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 07:25 PM
1

What? When you know the gender just use the gender obviously. Why would you use "they" when you know the gender? Idk what's going through your head but I don't think I've ever had a situation where I had to think about pronouns for longer to figure out what was going on.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 08:39 AM
6

"they" works fine, those aren't really necessary
/r/MensRights01/04/23 11:14 PM
1

Yeah no shit? No one here has been arguing against that
/r/MensRights10/03/23 10:22 AM
1

Not at all, I just meant second gender as in when you design something for one gender and then apply it to the other one. There's an order there, first gender and then second gender. The education system is a prime example. Although it's not that clearly discriminatory, the fact boys have to go through a system that is pretty much made for girls is clearly a problem.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 10:12 AM
1

I mean idk about all that stuff but I think the point is just that pregnancy is very painful and uncomfortable, so having a baby without pregnancy would be hugely attractive to most women, whereas i imagine most men who want to have a kid with their partner wouldn't mind either way. Assuming the vast majority of children would still be born under hetero relationships, i don't think this will change the privilege/rights situation too much in those cases.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 10:06 AM
1

How?
/r/MensRights10/03/23 09:18 AM
1

Not exactly, because there are much more significant natural differences between males and females than there are between blacks and whites. And certain social dynamics evolve as a consequence. If you always apply the exact same things to both genders, the second one will usually end up worse off
/r/MensRights10/03/23 09:10 AM
2

Speak for yourself...
/r/MensRights13/02/23 10:58 AM
1

i didn’t mean to reply to you. i couldn’t care less if you liked or disliked my comment. i’m just expressing my opinion on this specific comment. Which is that i love it.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:42 PM
1

One of my favourite comments of all time, I'm gonna frame it and hang it up in my toilet
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:10 PM
1

It is, but the key missing point is that that information is guided/filtered. Ai bots without this often end up spouting some wild shit. Some examples are Replika and Tay.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 12:48 PM
-1

Lmfao this comment is golden
/r/MensRights02/02/23 09:00 AM
-6

Interesting findings, but you are wrong about how it is programmed
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:54 AM
-4

Sorry, that is completely incorrect
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:51 AM
2

Unfortunately I feel really uncomfortable getting too close to men, so most of my male friendships are quite surface level. This is one thing I'd say feminists are right about, at least for me, though blaming it on the "patriarchy" is just an oversimplification of a complicated issue. My closest friendships have always been with women, but over the last couple years, some those relationships have been compromised by them becoming more radical and less accepting of challenging views. (I did not c…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:53 AM
-1

Where is the bit where they say that everyone here advocates for or promotes rape?
/r/MensRights26/01/23 09:37 AM
5

...and then making a medicine app 😂. No but seriously, this woman could actually have a degree in medicine. I can't tell you how many women I've met who display incredible ignorance in part of a subject they're supposed to be experts in, just because that part doesn't fit their agenda. I can't quite believe it every time I encounter it.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 09:33 AM
3

do you have a source for that claim? I thought the word first came about because of people who simply fit the literal meaning of the term. This source seems to agree with me: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45284455 though i haven't looked into it very much
/r/MensRights15/01/23 06:35 PM
5

What's funny about this post is it can just as easily be framed by a feminist as society valuing the man a woman is with rather than the woman herself
/r/MensRights13/01/23 09:49 PM
6

I mean, the initial advice in each case is good. Whether it's right or wrong, the one who's afraid of being stalked is at least providing insight into how a lot of women think in such a situation. It's mostly this guy's answers that are stupid, at least it seems that way to me.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 12:04 PM
1

The climate being fucked by emissions is not a "view" or "opinion"...
/r/MensRights29/12/22 11:08 PM
8

What about the dumb ass who seems to not realise that one man can rape many women?
/r/MensRights04/12/22 09:02 PM
1

But what about the inside output?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 08:57 PM
1

Everything else? That doesn't really make sense, how does she get into you in the first place then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 11:09 PM
9

"Gaslighting" is a word which is easy to weaponize; it's a bit like calling someone "sexist" or "racist". All of these kinds of terms are initially thought of in extreme forms, which 99.99% of people agree are bad things. So very negative connotations get attached to these words. However, they can also have a bunch of different definitions, which end up encapsulating much more than their extreme versions. Yet the extreme connotations of the words remain, so if someone does the mildest version of…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 10:59 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights24/10/22 06:30 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights24/10/22 06:29 AM
1

yep, that way the girl would have never admitted she was lying and the boy woulda stayed in jail :D
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:50 AM
3

No way ur saying Millie Alcock is average or below average bruh she's pretty af
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:57 AM
-3

I would never be that insecure with my family.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:08 AM
1

So what are women's strengths?
/r/MensRights31/08/22 05:24 PM
1

But people who cherry pick the bible don't necessarily preach otherwise? And cherry picking the bible is not inconsistent
/r/MensRights19/08/22 07:28 PM
1

So to get ur respect the only made up shit they can believe in is the stuff in the bible?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 07:21 PM
1

Religion is whatever u want it to be
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:45 PM
1

Sorry what is the pevlis' relevance here?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:01 AM
-2

No? I think what you're referring to is the way some people view modern society. Patriarchy doesn't "blame" or "ignore".
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:00 PM
-2

Why is "patriarchy" an anti male term?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:46 PM
-1

Still no examples, unless you're referring to heard-depp, which is not even close to the situation here.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:49 PM
1

I agree with some of what you said but I have been around and never seen anyone with views this extreme. We're talking about a guy who almost got murdered because he rejected one girl and slept with another, and may now fear women because of it. I maintain that no one would ever call this guy an incel.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 12:13 PM
-3

Find me an example even remotely close to this situation where more than 1 person labels the guy an incel. Even 1 person labeling the person an incel would shock me tbh, absolutely no one is that dumb.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:19 AM
-16

No one is gonna call this guy an incel woman hater...
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:02 AM
1

How do i think? I never said anything that has anything to do with the way I behave, or the way anyone behaves. I only said that saying that "from an evolutionary point of view, our only purpose is to breed" is an oversimplification.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:29 AM
2

A bit off topic but the second paragraph is not quite true, as communal animals it is also in our interests that our community survives and breeds.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:29 AM
-1

Oh whoops didn't realise it was you 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:24 AM
1

This was in response to someone saying that they have not been massively outperforming men in the education system. I guess what this person meant is that the only reason women get better grades is teachers being extremely sexist or something. But whilst true, it's also true that women do perform better in the education system, since it exists in a way which suits them.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:24 AM
1

Could u share a demonstration of those attributes correlating to gender? Thanks
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:07 AM
-24

They have very much been earning them. The education system is woeful and panders to women.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:03 AM
1

Could u share an example of u posting smth and being treated like a devil's reject?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:29 PM
-2

OK... So why would women being angels mean we'd have no need for a legal system? If men have the capacity for evil doesn't that mean a legal system is still needed?
/r/MensRights08/05/22 11:17 AM
2

Ikr!! In my opinion it's also evil to have sex and make baby the normal way because, most likely only one sperm cell will fertilise the egg whilst the other sperm cells die!! That's LITERALLY human MURDER!!!!
/r/MensRights08/05/22 09:36 AM
0

"they're certainly not angels. If they were we would not need a legal system". What does this mean then?
/r/MensRights08/05/22 09:11 AM
-2

Wait are you saying we only need a legal system because of women?
/r/MensRights08/05/22 09:00 AM
6

You will actually, there are quite a few. But yeah most share our understanding of the difference between gender and biological sex.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 02:45 PM
7

Hmm, rhum-runner does make an excellent point here.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:38 AM
5

Look to spread love. Stop being an asshole.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:25 AM
-40

Do you have anything to back this up with? Because this is essentially a conspiracy theory. I remember overhearing this guy at my school making fun of how she looked. I think it's clear that fat shaming is a real thing that happens. Even if you have a strong opinion on a contraversial topic, it doesn't mean that every little thing that stands against your opinion has to be some kind of lie.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter