TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

soviet_enjoyer Archive

View 0 posts and 102 comments by soviet_enjoyer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Immediately ban dating apps. Reform family law to make things more equitable. Establish extremely generous subsidies for families, guarantee every new family a home, extend family leave and make it mandatory for both mothers and fathers. Heavily invest into new community centers for the youth to meet each other. Start a massive propaganda campaign against promiscuity and in favor of monogamy, censoring and/or banning any media promoting promiscuity or polygamy. Make polygamy straight up illegal.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 02:29 PM
0

You seem to miss the fact that current generations fucking less is precisely because of hook up culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 10:45 AM
1

Bulking means achieving a calorie surplus, which is necessary to increase muscle mass. Now if by “bulking” you mean gorging yourself and becoming borderline overweight I would agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 12:19 PM
5

It’s a comedic video. It is not meant to be a dictionary definition of the term “friendzone”. Lighten up for a second.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 03:05 PM
–

That’s capitalist realism for you. A lot of people have been rendered unable to even imagine a better society. They really do think there’s no alternative to this insane rat race. So the solution, they think, must be to optimize for said competition, when it’s precisely that causing the societal problem in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 11:45 PM
2

Idk I have some old relatives who were/are clearly some kind of autistic, other people in their villages were like “oh yes [name] is a bit weird but is a good dude”, they all had wives and kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 08:07 AM
1

I mean that’s an obvious tell. I thought the commenter above meant “smelling” as in some sort of sixth sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 07:14 PM
2

Men want to have their own kids, not to be a stepdad raising the result of some scum ejaculating in their now wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 07:06 PM
5

It’s obvious it’s not literal smell lol I understood that, but I don’t think there exists some other 6th sense for that either. It’s just observation of behaviors which can be voluntarily changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:39 AM
3

If the man has a modicum of intelligence and knows that he shouldn’t be perceived as desperate it’s not really hard for him to conceal it. He mostly just needs to not do certain things, such as giving her too much attention. Way easier than faking confidence for example, in which you typically need to go out of your way to act uncharacteristically.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:32 AM
3

That’s not smelling, that’s just observing someone’s actions. You could argue desperation can’t really be concealed well enough so that it is always apparent, but I do not buy that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:28 AM
1

My grandparents had what I would say was a very fulfilling relationship until the death of one of them. Sure they most likely didn’t have sex as ninety years old, but they definitely were soulmates. They genuinely loved each other and continued to do so for more than sixty years of marriage. If any such thing as “relationships goals” exist, in my mind that’s it. It was a semi-arranged marriage by the way: the families introduced them to each other and since they clicked they gave them the approv…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 12:10 AM
–

American communists aren’t voting blue lmao. Most are either voting third party or abstaining; a few might even vote Trump for foreign policy reasons (NATO). At this point no communist is “pro-Ukraine”. If you were interacting with any part of any communist movement at any level you would know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 11:42 PM
–

They voted to leave when the USSR was basically collapsed already. A few months prior they overwhelmingly voted to maintain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 10:37 PM
–

I’m a communist and none of the things listed apply to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 07:39 PM
–

Except that those who actually lived through socialist times in those countries are on average nostalgic about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 07:35 PM
–

Something tells me many of your former compatriots in Donbass would disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 07:33 PM
1

Are the Soviets the good guys Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 06:53 AM
5

Liberal politicians won’t ever help the working class.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 06:47 AM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? It’s quite literally a movement that would cause societal collapse if it caught on. Any self preserving State would be right to completely suppress it, crush it to pieces and then scatter the ashes. Thank god it’s only a psychotic sect in South Korea at the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 02:18 PM
2

Will not work. Women with autism don’t want men with autism, they’re busy chasing chad as much as other women nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 11:46 AM
20

Personally I’m not interested in it. I consider it an immoral activity to partake in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 04:25 PM
1

The issue is not the population number but the proportion of young people as a percentage of the total population.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:27 PM
1

Blame those who did away with the Asperger syndrome diagnosis… it makes no sense odd guys with 180 IQ get lumped in with non-verbals. It’s very clearly not the same issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:13 PM
1

Societal collapse due to falling birth rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 06:26 AM
1

By then they will have already gotten the chance to experience the enlightened rule of comrade Kim Jong Un. There will be no “South Korea” to be turned around anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:27 PM
2

Stuff like that is part of the reason South Korea WILL lose to the DPRK in the long run. Those ideologies are cancerous for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 11:19 PM
2

I already pooped twice today.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 11:47 AM
1

I absolutely agree with that as well. Doesn’t mean we can’t or shouldn’t do both things. Those measures seem far fetched because modern western societies are fundamentally liberal (economically and socially; this is the direct consequence of a capitalist mode of production). That can, and in fact should, change. It’s not set in stone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:36 PM
2

Even “conservative” countries have absorbed a lot of social liberalism, due to the US being the hegemonic power and exporting its culture. Still, those countries have a higher TFR than more socially liberal ones. Again, see South Korea for a glimpse of what we’re heading towards. The lack of stable marriages and relationships is directly linked to promiscuity. If you decouple sex from commitment you are going to get less stable relationships since it becomes possible to just “sleep around” inste…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:10 PM
2

If the State made dating apps illegally it could censor them, just as it now censors drug markets. Look at fertility rates, divorce rates, marriage rates, hell even loneliness rates among the youngest generations. Or just take a peek at South Korea to see what we’re heading forward. If new, stable, families aren’t being formed at a sufficient rate, society goes down the toilet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:48 PM
1

First of all, Tinder is not a social media. The State already censors illegal websites. You can’t sell drugs on Amazon for example. The woes of the Middle East are not caused by adultery laws or internet censorship lmao. They’re caused by widespread poverty, economic inequality and corruption. You can’t enjoy your “rights” in a failing society. Drop the liberal idealism for a second and it’s beyond obvious that certain individual “rights” need to be curtailed for the benefits of society at large…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:43 PM
1

Social mores, which decades of social liberalism have very carefully dismantled. Social conditioning alone is extremely effective. Criminalize adultery and polygamy. Tinder and similar apps should also be banned. I know it must be difficult to wrap your head around it but not everyone who opposes social liberalism is a religious fundamentalist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:25 PM
2

A more promiscuous society can easily have less sex. People in stable relationships have in fact way more sex that those engaging in casual “relationships”. I’m not a religious fanatic. In fact I’m not religious at all. It’s not even about numbers (the fact those averages are different for men and women should tell you they’re not accurate at all, but that’s beyond the point I’m making). It’s about how it became completely socially accepted to have sex outside committed relationships. Sleeping a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:17 PM
2

Male and female promiscuity are both on the rise, dramatically. Mistresses and similar arrangements were only somewhat common among the extremely wealthy. The average Joe and the average Jane were not promiscuous usually. And yes I do consider that behavior absolutely immoral also. It is not a gendered problem. The problem is promiscuity, no matter who does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:59 PM
2

I don’t understand the point your trying to make. Do you realize we have been through a massive social change from the 70s onward right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:33 PM
2

You seem to be under the impression that the total amount of promiscuous behavior remained unchanged. That is simply a myth. And yes, anti-social behavior should not be encouraged or accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:27 PM
-1

Sure. But not as much as today and it wasn’t socially accepted. Nowadays the default, one hundred percent accepted and socially approved and even praised mindset is complete and utter hedonism and individualism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:13 PM
0

In many respects you’re right. But it’s undeniable that promiscuity is now widely accepted at least in the West. What is considered acceptable behavior now would’ve been unthinkable even 50 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:09 PM
-2

I’m not religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:04 PM
-10

That’s because most people in today’s society are animals with no moral compass.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:02 PM
3

Start by banning dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 08:32 AM
2

The only thing wrong with a “commie past” is the “past” part. Traitors belong to the gulag.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 01:29 PM
–

It’s more the being subordinate part I think is ridiculous, for any sex. I personally wouldn’t mind making a sandwich but I warn you I’m pretty bad at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 11:34 AM
–

1.The average man is fine with this 2.Again the average man is fine with this 3.The average man couldn’t be a fuckboy even if he wanted 4.Probably correct. 6.You think the average men doesn’t want to have sex by the third date? 7.That’s just standard human decency. The only request the average man would find unreasonable (rightly so) is number 5 which is ridiculous on purpose I assume. The problem with any “reverse red pill” it’s the situation is patently not symmetrical. So you end up preaching…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 11:19 AM
1

1.No such thing, if I didn’t want a response before a certain time I would’ve simply sent the message later. 2.It would have to be truly excessive and embarrassing, again there’s probably no such thing in practice. 3.The purpose of dating is to form a relationship, and it’s good to be serious about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 10:13 AM
1

Why should anyone take lesson from a degenerate scumbag?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:50 PM
2

Those reasons may cease to exist after a while, especially if there’s a conscious effort to address them. I don’t buy that anybody, men or women, can smell inexperience as accurately as you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 01:56 PM
0

That’s blatantly fucked up and unethical. Literally using others as mere objects. Peak liberal-capitalist perversion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 01:53 PM
1

If you think the reason those guys aren’t getting laid is “lack of emotional availability” you must live in fantasy land.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 12:13 AM
1

Many woman don’t care about those qualities. You can easily see all kind of trash getting relationships easily, even multiple at a times since they usually are the kind to cheat as well. In some aspects the standards are too low while in others they’re just stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 12:12 AM
1

You cannot sustain an aging population with a shrinking pool of working people. It’s simply impossible barring some sci-fi technological advance that isn’t there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:19 AM
1

People on average have 0 ability to even speculate logically on what will happen in the future. They prefer to write quippy but completely useless remarks until reality smacks them in the face.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:17 AM
2

Because I have morals and am not an hedonistic animal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:50 PM
2

The whole concept of “exclusivity” not being the default is mind boggling and perverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:48 PM
3

(Most) Western men can’t hook up non stop even if they want to and the liberal ideology associated with the sexual revolution took hold in Western societies the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 05:20 PM
3

You asked why wouldn’t legalizing prostitution lead to better conditions for client. The “Nordic Model” makes it very clear that the two are not necessarily linked since any government can legalize selling but not buying. Sure the goal of such a policy is not to normalize prostitution, that’s the whole point of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:40 PM
1

The point of such a model is to legalize buying but not selling, ie to punish the client but not the prostitute. I do not know the intricacies of modern feminist factions, but usually feminists push for the Nordic model and in general have very little sympathy for clients.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:34 PM
0

Look up the “Nordic model”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:30 PM
5

As you liberals always, without fail, do, you first completely ruin and destroy existing, functioning, social institutions with your poisonous social liberalism and then tell everybody who dares question such “progress” to just accept that’s how things are, that the ship has sailed and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 11:27 AM
2

The problem is not the number of people but the proportion of people working compared to the elderly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 06:03 PM
-1

Marxism-Leninism
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 05:36 PM
-2

Enjoy a rotten husk of a society in exchange for “personal freedom” that you can’t even enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 09:10 AM
6

They absolutely do in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 01:16 AM
–

You’re expecting social decorum out of people engaging in “booty calls”. That’s your first mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:28 PM
–

Two degenerates fuck around and discover why being promiscuous and treating each other like sex objects is a bad idea. I’m truly shocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:25 PM
2

It tends to end badly since the man usually catches feelings. Chaos ensues. But it’s probably fine if you don’t get too close.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 11:05 PM
–

Yeah sure, that’s why the geniuses at Harvard are slaying mad pussy and IQ correlates highly with sexual success, right? Except that doesn’t happen and in fact being of significatively above average intelligence actually hinders you when it comes to attracting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 08:54 PM
1

Yeah sure, that’s why the geniuses at Harvard are slaying mad pussy and IQ correlates highly with sexual success, right? Except that doesn’t happen and in fact being of significatively above average intelligence actually hinders you when it comes to attracting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 08:54 PM
1

Yeah sure. Nobody is going to fall for your bs anyway. We know what’s best for our chances and it’s not crying in front of women. No matter how much mental gymnastics you do to deny the obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 09:17 PM
2

Good. Polygamy should be illegal. It should also be actively persecuted. Polygamy is bad for everybody involved and most importantly society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 07:40 AM
1

“Great company” of someone using him as her wallet? I can imagine what kind of company would such a lowlife golddigger provide. I wouldn’t classify it as “great”. The money he pays gets him the meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:28 PM
1

You evidently do not but after all you’re a woman so that doesn’t surprise me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:25 PM
1

They can only play games by misreading what is being said. That’s their whole modus operandi. Well, that and completely denying reality and being deliberately obtuse.
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 08:48 AM
16

Because he’s a degenerate criminal who should be in a labor camp. Instead he’s rewarded. It shows the clownery that is modern society.
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 12:09 AM
1

Your “evidence” is a mentally ill transvestite who raped his own mother. Much less representative of the male population than gym girls are of the female one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 09:36 AM
9

Being an attention whore is her whole “job”.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 07:53 AM
6

It’s self evident she’s not fine going “below”, otherwise she wouldn’t be complaining on social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 07:43 AM
8

Ban Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 04:47 PM
1

You cannot have a friendship if one would bang the other, which is the case in 99% of straight men/women friendships. ESPECIALLY if the guy is single it’s guaranteed he’s going to catch feelings. The woman of course is probably going to become aware of this and at that point the whole “friendship” fizzles out (that is the better outcome) or it becomes a pathetic dynamic in which he’s being played and will make a fool of himself in hope of getting pussy (he will not). You can be acquaintances and…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 05:27 PM
1

I didn’t say they’re meaningless. But they should be taken with a grain of salt. Current academics especially in social “sciences” are generally not smart. You would know if you met them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 04:47 PM
2

This is the oldest kind of lie ever. Seriously, you think men going around bragging about slaying nonexistent women is something OP made up? Cavemen were probably doing it already lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 04:37 PM
1

Are you sure they’re not having gay orgies in that club and don’t want their wives to know? Semi-serious question.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 04:51 PM
1

They do not want woman-only, they want chad-only lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 04:49 PM
–

Local woman goes on dates with low iq chads from Tinder, complains they can’t have an interesting conversation. Color me shocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 07:14 AM
13

Or just ban Tinder and co and throw the capitalists behind them in prison. Although that’s more of a Chinese approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 06:34 PM
–

You said a 10 for some may be a 4/5 for others. While that can happen I think it’s far less common than you think. Considering your example, I’d say most women would rate Chalamet highly as well. He’s objectively good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 06:10 PM
–

To be fair most women don’t like grotesquely muscular men either. Many guys do like moderately muscular women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 06:05 PM
–

He’s an objectively very good looking, very popular, very famous celebrity. Sure he’s not the “chad” stereotype, but surely he’s in the very top of men in attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 06:03 PM
–

“Taste is subjective, that’s why I really like this Hollywood celebrity”. I think you could’ve chosen a better example to make that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 04:57 PM
1

No, the USSR counts and it was based
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 04:36 PM
14

Because we’ve seen it over and over.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 06:50 AM
1

No you’re just wrong I say that as a communist myself. Population collapse would be a potential problem in any society and communist (more realistically socialist but that would be arguing semantics) one would be no exception. Now I do believe that under a socialist government we wouldn’t have the population collapse we’re seeing in the first place, but that’s another story.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:07 PM
1

Depending on the country it’s legal. In some there are even legal brothels.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 02:45 PM
4

Average young guy is not getting laid period.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 02:24 PM
–

The typical murderer is not a socially awkward guy with aspergers lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 01:18 PM
0

No, the average guy struggles to find a girlfriend. What you’re seeing, as you correctly pointed out, is delusional women hoping that way above average guys will see her as something more after they fucked her. If they shot a bit lower and tried to find relationships instead of engaging in casual sex they wouldn’t have this problem, they could easily find an average boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 01:12 PM
–

Because they’re pathetic simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 01:01 PM
37

When women reject men they do it outright Falser words have never been spoken.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 10:11 PM
4

I should have said women having homosexual relationships. Although not all of those “bisexual” women would even consider an homosexual relationship and many use the label to mean they get drunk and kiss their friends or simply for clout, I still think there are more lesbian couples than gay couples at least from personal observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 09:03 PM
0

Also there are more lesbians than gays. This might contribute a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 07:36 PM
1

They are in relationship with older guys. They think they’re in a relationship with a guy who doesn’t view it the same way, ie they’re deluding themselves but they’re for casual sex only. They are in a relationship with a guy who in fact has multiple relationships at the same time, they might or might not be aware of this. This group probably overlaps with the aforementioned one. Also there are more lesbians than gays but this probably only accounts for a very small disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 07:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter