TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

soyspagetti Archive

View 0 posts and 600 comments by soyspagetti on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So you believe in some duty that people have to humanity, that goes beyond obeying laws?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:37 AM
–

It would happen right until you become the guy who is always stuck bearing actual financial, emotional or temporal costs that result directly from her actions 🤷🏼‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:35 AM
–

Is there anything that you just can’t stand in people or intra-personal relationships and have a huge contempt for?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:45 AM
1

How does “women should be gatekeepers of sex” fit in your progressive framework?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:28 AM
–

Everybody poops, even princesses. You never really knew this girl. You didn’t run a household with her, didn’t try to figure out how to pay rent, she never left dirty dishes around her apartment, she never yelled at you for stupid shit because she is on her period. If you spoke with her siblings who have to share territory with this girl, the ex who happily moved on, or parents who paid her bills, they could (hypothetically) tell you a couple of nasty things about her habits.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:06 AM
–

Did you ever date or hookup? Also, just curious, how old are you now?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:38 AM
1

Yes. Sometimes I just see people setting this bar of success so high and then use it as a baseline for comparison
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:04 PM
1

Ok. From what I understand, this is “economically left”, not “socially left”.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:00 PM
1

Sure. What is it about your views that is socially progressive?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:53 PM
1

Sucks if y'all want something more than an occasional crappy hookup, but this is nowhere near being doomed to singlehood. All 40 of you can’t be incels simultaneously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:48 PM
1

Dating advice isn’t geared towards hyper-attractive men like Hasan.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:41 PM
1

Stawp. Average guys are not incels: average guys are married and have children. I’m not saying it’s easy out there, I am saying the odds of finding someone “nice” to settle down with are in their favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:01 PM
1

You are talking to me as if I was a man from your camp of social conservatism - my goal is not to preserve my sense of self-worth, my goal is to have a picture of the world that is functional enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 08:49 PM
1

I don’t know, if I saw you solve cognitively demanding puzzles maybe I’d realize how smart you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 08:17 PM
2

Not only would this change my view of you, this would change my view of myself and everything around me. Intelligent people drop their convictions when they are presented with good evidence of the opposite being true: stubbornness, rigidity, loyalty to your views are not markers of great mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 08:07 PM
1

You do not have a 150 IQ. When we argued about abortion you rolled around in your own shit spitting every logical fallacy in the book and then you punched out. People with 150s IQ would never say “women are supposed to be gatekeepers of sex” - this is thinking of people who are not burdened with intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:50 PM
1

😂. Do you think you are a good thinker?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:37 PM
1

You are ahead of 95% of men, who are as bad as these women 🤷🏼‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:46 PM
–

How attractive these women are can be deduced from how many men find them attractive, which they do. If they were men, they would not have been attractive, but they are not men, so they are attractive. If my grandma had wheels she would be a bicycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:08 PM
–

How did we jump from “women can’t rate other women” to “female beauty can exist on the spectrum”. If the second part is true, then, women are in fact rating these women correctly, you are just mad that men don’t have as many avenues.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:58 PM
1

And you fucked these women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:52 PM
1

You could hypothetically find someone who is not a “today’s woman”, whatever that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:50 PM
2

Who promised you guys that everybody can be a millionaire playboy? Everybody can make marginal improvements, but not everybody can be top g, this is normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:47 PM
1

No, there is not always someone who makes more and who has all of the qualities you mentioned. It’s rare. And if it exists, it does not mean the woman can realistically get with this person.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:44 PM
1

Then… What relevance does this have to the conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:40 PM
2

Did you get drafted?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:46 AM
2

I understood what happened. You got rage-baited into giving her hyper-specific examples. You should not have.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:45 AM
3

I don’t understand the question. The concept of beauty standards dates back far longer than marriages, or arranged marriages - it’s based on instinct and is emergent from our evolutionary past. Concept of modesty needed to exist precisely because immodesty encourages these instincts associated with beauty standards to come forward and ruin social constructs, which is also why people put effort into their looks. Just because people could not marry for love does not mean they did not want to. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 07:37 PM
2

If we start picking examples from elsewhere you just aren’t going to win our little oppression Olympics, so I don’t see why you would want to continue playing the game rather than constraint it to the western world - which is your best bet at making good points.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 07:14 PM
2

I am getting downvoted, but some retard below told you you are projecting. I don’t know how we both can be wrong - it’s one or the other. Either redpillers feel good about themselves, or not, and it seems like they can’t pick their poison.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:45 PM
0

I don’t know, ask people from your community who talk shit about the 19th amendment. I don’t know why you linked this
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:43 PM
3

You can say this, but I’m not sure that any of this is indicative of insecurity - seems to me like red-pillers think of themselves very well for no apparent reason. People don’t get dumb and smug because they are acutely self-aware. Self-consciousness would be an upgrade for these people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:25 PM
4

No. We have to approximate male experience to some form of common denominator, not discuss remote, fringe possibilities of becoming a billionaire or being drafted to Iran.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:19 PM
-1

Looking at the arguments they make, many of which revolve around some form of cucking women out of rights and freedoms, I would argue that some of these people are way too secure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:04 PM
6

When was the last time you‘ve been to war or prison?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:31 PM
1

You should. You are not voting Republican because of the stock market, you are voting Republican because they make you feel good. The Republicans can crush the market like they did earlier this year, and you will keep voting Republican. Trump can take a dump on your kitchen table tomorrow and you will call it a sophisticated art performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:46 PM
1

I don’t think you are kind. There is nothing in here to conflate with weakness in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:43 PM
1

Of course not, I am just saying that investing does not give anybody a moral leg to stand on when they yap about others being sheep. “I am not a bot like females because I buy S&P” - no, you are just a financially responsible bot. And I eat broccoli while most people eat chocolate, so I am a healthy bot. Ultimately, neither one of us invented anything knew - we do the thing that smart people told us to do. I am impressed by people who do something without a template or a blueprint, but not becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:42 PM
–

Maybe, maybe not. Look at the stock market, look at policy. Why don’t you figure it out next cycle instead of being a typical run of the mill Trump brained cocksucker? The issue is not that you voted Republican, the issue is your reason why. Your entire decision was informed by vibes only.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:13 PM
1

😂. Yes, dude, this is a very common and not at all cognitively demanding thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:04 PM
–

I am basic. I don’t need to have my picture up because I’m not obsessed with your validation, or seeming interesting, nor do I fire shots at people for being a boring herd. I am just here to say that in spite your attempts to be “not like other girls”, you worked your entire life to become like the basic 304s you despise 🤷🏼‍♀️ except you don’t have a vagina I guess, just a girl cock, so maybe this is what differentiates you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:50 PM
–

He is reasonable and can contribute financially, but I’m not sure what this has to do with being unique or successful? In my world, people aren’t “boring“ as a default until they jump out of their shoes to prove otherwise - I don’t evaluate these things like an edgy shut-in virgin who has to pretend they are above it all. This is the red-pilled view of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:43 PM
–

And an instahoe. You are a handsome, well off, basic bitch who screws around with other basic bitches, who, despite being basic, dictate your lifestyle. I am just a stranger online, you don’t need to dance for my validation and prove that you are, in fact, very interesting. I am trying to say, the contempt with which you view women is also how you would regard yourself if you were self-aware and evaluated your presentation objectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:41 PM
–

You want to compete with a chick half your age over how much you’ve invested? What is this competition?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:26 PM
–

Classic NPC talking point, and the answer is a gigastacy “yes”. Because this party, while talking shit about you, actually focuses on policy that benefits you and your community, as oppose to the party that panders to you and makes you feel good and does fuck all to improve your actual situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:22 PM
–

You should not have a problem with violence as a man, by your own world view, your role is to push back if anyone ever comes for your ass. I actually have a ton of respect for someone who posts their face alongside their comment history, and I think this should be a standard for any community that wants to cuck others out of rights, I think a lot of people will be far less annoyed with red pilled corners of the internet if we could see the faces of people who type this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:13 PM
–

As oppose to red pillers, all of who are unique and special snowflakes despite having fuck all to show for it. You are a basic bitch just like everyone else. Embrace it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:08 PM
–

You consider yourself a successful person because you invest? This is just bare minimum financial literacy. Do you also consider yourself successful because you wipe your ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:02 PM
–

This country is turning into a populist clown show because of men. Because your gender is too emotional to vote in their best interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:58 PM
–

Women won’t put up with you even for sex. Strange flex, considering that we have a male loneliness epidemic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:57 PM
–

The funniest thing is that you would never post a selfie, because you are too bitch made to show the world who is standing behind your takes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:56 PM
–

What are you successful in and what color is your Bugatti?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:54 PM
2

Do you know what a circular argument is? You are making one right now. You did not establish that medical abortion is murder, because you did not establish that a zygote as a person. The fact that abortion is murder is the end goal of what you are trying to prove. People don’t commit others to psychiatric care as a punitive measure because you committed the crime of harming blood vessels (no such thing), people commit others when they see they have capacity to harm other individuals. If you gave…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 05:37 PM
1

It’s not my job to present you a prove of lack of personhood, it’s your job to clearly establish it. “False, we absolutely do. A bruise is your body cells damaged and you can easily go to police with that. There are laws covering that.” Sir, if I break your laptop you can go to small claims court and sue the fuck out of me, it does not mean that legal protections of life extend to your laptop or your blood vessels, it means that we are considering these things as extensions of you. On the same n…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 04:25 PM
1

Yeah, but your personal experience does not date all the way back to conception. There is no personhood in a zygote. We don’t consider plants or cells in your body as worthy of protections that you elected to extend to zygote, even though they react to stimuli.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 12:30 PM
1

As a person with some kind of memory like that you should not have an issue recalling what I did and didn’t state. I haven’t even started making any excuses, because we can’t move past you tripping over your own statements in every other paragraph. If you acknowledge your memories don’t illustrate your personhood at conception, why state your memories as a data point? You think we should not eat or gather plants? How far does this ethical standard go?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 05:17 AM
1

Oh… So, like, you are not a war veteran and you still have the right to vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 05:02 AM
1

So, unaroused vagina guarantees terrible experience for both parties involved - it’s the same impact as fucking you in the ass, no spit, nothing. The only guys who will forcefully penetrate a woman are the guys who get kicks out of this kind of stuff. When your girl finally allows you to touch her down there, you will see that she gets less tight and more wet when she gets aroused.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 04:55 AM
1

Then go and fight for your equality. Feminists can’t be changing your diaper, burping you and guiding you through life. Women had their issues - women solved them, you and your movement are just like yapping into the void while thinking “we, men, are eating shit” is somehow a dunk on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 04:45 AM
1

Because men and women are different. The real question is why do you think you deserve the same rights as women while you are objectively a net negative to the society?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 04:40 AM
1

Hold up, let’s take this apart one emotional outburst at a time. You Loki’s wagered yourself into this confusion that we have to unconfuse. Whenever we try to define who or what is worthy of consideration, 95% of pro-choicers think that drawing the line at conception is the wrong answer, and dragging full on babies out of women while they kick and scream is also the wrong answer. Now, your memories do not span back all the way to conception. Which position do you think this data point defends?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 04:26 AM
1

Because we are not dumb dawg 😂🤦🏼‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 03:29 AM
1

Why would anyone want to be equal to you? You eating shit is your own problem
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 03:28 AM
1

Not when you penetrate it. The woman has to be aroused for vagina to lubricate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 03:27 AM
1

What do you mean by “I believe”? Why believe or disbelief things if you can gain foundational knowledge of philosophy and neuroscience and have a more sophisticated understanding of the world? ”Believing” and then immediately acting on these beliefs is what five-year olds do - well, this is half of our nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 03:25 AM
2

You are giving people emotional arguments, which is why your side is universally bullied. Next time you ask yourself “why is it that conservatives are regarded as subhuman?”, you screeching “little fingers” and “murder of innocent babies” is the reason why.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:50 PM
2

So then maybe men should start doing yearly checkups that you call unnecessary? 🤦🏼‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:13 PM
3

Yearly checkups are absolutely necessary, how many times have you heard people tell others “do regular checkups”, especially if you have a family history. You are an actual moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:12 PM
6

Mothers and children also routinely died. I keep trying to move on from this post but you say too much dumb shit per unit of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:10 PM
2

So it’s feminists job to protect you too? awwww 🥹
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:09 PM
1

More like community retard wondered off into the debate territory
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:09 PM
4

When you are making assertions it’s your job to provide sources. When we tell you you are a retard the source is this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:06 PM
7

So, this is an exhibit A of why we need to ban virgins from this sub: they are smug and dumb, the only acceptable format to have any conversation about anything woman-related is the one where people tell you things and you take notes, so that next time you don’t sound stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:03 PM
11

When someone fucks you in the ass unconsensually, do you bleed? Vagina won’t lubricate when a woman is getting raped, it will tighten. It will do irreparable damage to how you view sexual relations, and you’ll despise men as a class for life - female prisons are full of women who were serially sexually abused, they‘ll love to torture you to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 11:56 AM
2

“Women should either be drafted into the armed forces or drafted to give birth. It’s unfair that only men have ever been drafted.” Women didn’t fight for draft because women are smart and your gender is glue-eating morons, because it’s your gender who is bought into the idea of patriotism, brotherhood and other propaganda. You being drafted is not women’s problem. It’s a problem created by men affecting men. Go address it with men, we are under no obligation to be as retarded as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 11:43 AM
0

Without diving deep into the vomitorium that is red-pilled or even tradcon school of thought, this perfectly logical argument only works with people who are already bought into few assumptions that you hold as fundamental - but these are not the people who you’d have to explain any of this in the first place. This argument slides past anyone who has a vested interest in keeping women unemployed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:37 AM
-3

The honest answer is that women don’t want to work, but they want to fuck and get pregnant by a certain type of man so little that being a wage slave is a better alternative. Women are just too polite to speak to these people like they deserve to be spoken to, they need their unsocialized misandrist sister in arms to phrase the answer to this question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 02:19 AM
1

The only acceptable format in which we can have a conversation on what turns women on and which men are respectable is the one where you take notes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 02:09 AM
2

I have respect for him not because men respect him, but because he was brilliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 02:00 AM
1

Bro everyone lost their virginity to prostitute back then, stawp. Men did not marry as virgins. As for physical attractiveness, I don’t see which part of it has to do with respect? Women are actually able of respecting men who don’t look like ultra bangable supermodels, so when you are asserting otherwise, you are projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 01:29 AM
2

And they did not respect him?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:52 AM
1

Why is it failing? Which part can you not engage with?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:49 AM
1

Then what do I need to talk to you for? Your function in my life is to be a sanity check and a sounding board.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:28 AM
–

Which part requires the substance?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:11 AM
–

Engage with the hypothetical. I am just asking questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:09 AM
1

I mean, how would you possibly know what women thought of Napoleon and who women respect?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:07 AM
1

No offense but how would you possibly know - because you what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:57 PM
–

What if you tell your daughter not to get an abortion because little hands and shit, and the fetus tells you: “this is an emotion-driven soy argument, if people who are so mentally unstable and irrational get to vote away abortion rights I’d rather not be born”?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:28 PM
1

Oh, sorry, gotcha. I would say, people get more sophisticated and learn to control their short-term impulse in favor of other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:16 PM
7

You are saying this as if these people are stupid and these arguments were ever presented in good faith. Yes, he realizes all of this and it just completely kills a man within him that given a choice women do not choose not him, so he will still argue against it, mostly to himself. To reinforce the argument, these types of people will cite the Bible, or evolutionary biology - 🤓 - or Jordan Peterson, or Peter Jordanson, but ultimately admitting women‘s agency to them is like wearing a T-shirt tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:11 PM
-1

Even if I did require that it basically boils down to who has more leverage (not most men), but no, rejection of traditional female role does not mean just dicking around and doing whatever. It usually means that you have a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:57 PM
1

“Deep down, the motivation for most women is to experience a wedding, have children, and achieve financial security” then why are you wasting my time arguing with me??
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:56 PM
-2

You are the common denominator
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:12 PM
0

Most men - especially men in weird pill communities - would be on their knees if she is hot, even if she is fucking someone every other week.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:09 PM
0

how are the male equivalents victims?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:07 PM
1

This is so stupid. Then why do friends suddenly decide to get married? Then who was the first woman who decided to get married at 30 and what was the motivation there?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:03 PM
2

Asking a man to be traditional and asking a woman to be traditional are not equivalent demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:00 PM
3

Does your community teach men how to insult people and still come across as classy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:45 PM
2

This is not really strange if you have a realization that you are not the main character: cucking you out of active sex life is not the goal, and casual sex or a lack of it isn’t the point. Everything that involves you is just a byproduct.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:30 PM
1

Fine, then Madonnas don’t exist, but what’s your point? Women can be more slutty or less slutty depending on an individual and their circumstances, and at 30 they get much less slutty. Not because they suddenly can’t fuck people, but because something shifts internally.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:16 PM
1

If only things were as easy as a pile a sluts who remain sluts and a pile of madonnas who are have always been madonnas.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:51 PM
1

I am not out here giggling with a stick up my ass about having everything figured out, like, chill the fuck out, people like you get cheated on and divorce raped and then cry that all women are manipulative evil bitches
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:45 PM
4

Bro, calm down, you and your community are literal evolutionary garbage who has to jump through hoops to get anybody, how are you over here firing shots at the best of mankind.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 12:09 PM
9

Napoleon was one of the most assertive, brilliant, charismatic men who has ever lived. Beta Napoleon, beta Bezos, beta Musk and alpha you, who is rolling around in his own shit and talks smack in weird corners of the internet. If the emperor of France is beta then who are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 12:07 PM
1

This happens all the time, you moron, even hot guys will occasionally fuck a porker. Be mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:59 AM
1

You are a moron
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:57 AM
1

No offense, but you are not a woman and can’t speak on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:57 AM
2

When you meet a 130 IQ breathing woman are you gonna go on a yap session?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 01:37 AM
2

What happened?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 01:27 AM
1

You have an extra chromosome because you are cognitively limited and you write like a first grader. Don’t reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:45 PM
1

“Im suppose” - you don’t deserve human rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:32 PM
1

You are such a woman, when you are forced to actually engage you immediately screech that you are attacked personally. Or, you can answer the question and state your problem clearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:30 PM
1

Holy shit, the lack of verbal IQ is astounding, why do you write like that? I prefer men who don‘t sound like they have an extra chromosome when they write.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:25 PM
1

I prefer men who can follow the train of thought. I jumped in stating something relevant, you jumped in to have a “dear diary“ moment and lecture all of us for the nth time on how you don’t like 30 year old women, how much issue you find with them, and how the men as a class are finally pushing back against women as a class - not that you have to fight off 30 year old women with a stick, mind you, which is why I called your yap sessions fanfiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:15 PM
1

You were doing something different, and I just explained exactly why, holy shit are you dense and slow. Listen carefully: women being able to fuck around disproves the other dipshit’s point that they aren’t able to fuck around. Who the fuck asked you what you prefer? Who are you pushing back against? Where is the issue that you claimed to be describing?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:06 PM
1

You do pursue them to tell them they don’t matter - I (f,25) existed totally parallel to you, before you jumped in and inserted your preferences which have nothing to do with the topic at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:36 PM
1

If this someone feels this way, they are welcome to explain why the substance of my comment does not apply to the substance of theirs, you don’t need to be white knighting here. That’s first of all. Second of all, the substance of my comment absolutely is a response to this guy’s comment. He said “women pretend to be mature at 30 because they can’t get laid at 30 by men they like”, and I said “this is untrue, women can always have sex, which is why their cognitive transformation is genuine”, to …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:32 PM
1

Bro, pay your punctuation bills, what is this verbal diarrhea. Why are you writing like you didn’t get your GED? Did I ever call you a dipshit? Then why are you getting offended on the dipshit’s behalf? Your turn will come, don’t you worry. When I said something about you walking up to women and saying things to their faces, I meant exercising your preferences in real time instead of writing fanfiction on rejecting someone online.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:19 PM
1

You waltzed in stating your standards unprompted, claiming that you are quote-unquote allowed to do it because women act this way, and you are going to be pushing back. This is your stance in this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:06 PM
19

Not dick size shaming specifically, but I had to cut someone who behaves like that out of my life for saying things that made me want to tell her to take a hard look in the mirror. There was probably a dick size comment somewhere among other comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 09:25 PM
0

Yet the most jaded woman in this conversation is you and the other guy. Look, I am signing your permission slip to go talk to girls that you like, however. The preference for younger woman is not a response to anything I’ve said. My point was “women can hookup at any age” and you are rolling in with “men prefer [blank]”. Men will be happy smashing any pussy, so - 🤷🏼‍♀️. The topic here is the mental transformation that women go through in their 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 09:15 PM
1

Because I’m not hearing anything that contradicts my narrative or anything that answers my questions. But when you started doing the “you don’t know me sistah you don’t know my story” I said - you are right, I don’t. I don’t know why you are telling me your preference. I don’t know who asked you what women you prefer (not) getting casual sex from. I don’t know who you are, and most importantly I have no idea what any of this has to do with women at 30 finding themselves in search of long-term re…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 09:01 PM
1

Again, what issues? I don’t know what requests you do and don’t get, which is precisely why I keep asking you questions “who are you pushing back against? Who are you talking to? Which women in their 30s are you rejecting?” What do women in their 30s do to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 08:26 PM
0

Feminism is prescriptive. You will never find a feminist who describes the movement as “well, I don’t work here, we are just out here telling you how things are, we are just yapping into the void, decide for yourself what to do with information…”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 08:07 PM
1

You don’t even know yourself at 23, but you are out here Disney villain laughing that you have womanity figured out because a girl gave you her number - maybe she’ll even let you touch her there, who knows 😏 maybe she’ll pop quiz you on anime arcs 😏
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:59 PM
2

You’d be retarded to adopt this as a part of your identity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:38 PM
3

Men aren’t stupid enough to fight for an actually socially conservative world, social conservatism is only utilized as a tool, and only when convenient. When inconvenient, it’s not utilized. Same goes for progressivism (Hasan Piker, debate bros on tiktok), but most of them recently realized that they aren’t hot enough for progressivism to work effectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:37 PM
1

You can push back, but this is just shadowboxing. Who are you pushing? The women who you have to “easily get” ? As a comparison, I don’t have to “easily get” any group of men that I find unlikeable, these people actively insert themselves in my spacetime, which is why I don’t look stupid when I complain that men who I only know by association or don’t know at all do or say x, y or z. You on the other hand look like a crazy homeless person. You are telling women in their 30s to not to swamp you w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:17 PM
1

Yeah, you said something dumb and pretend to not understand my argument. I’m pretty annoyed rn
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:04 PM
1

I explained to you exactly what happens three times, dipshit. Don’t like it? make a better argument for your side, don’t just cry that I insult you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:46 PM
11

The truth is that most women do bring more to the table than most men just by virtue of being female, and this post is you writing paragraphs of text to argue your way out of it because you find this unfair. Can woman fuck around and get someone to commit? Absolutely. This conversation can now be over. The second truth is that your perspective on risk-reward and what women should pursue remains perspective of someone who has a huge vested interest in the game, and all your prescriptions will be …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:44 PM
2

No, but it makes whoever eats it up retarded. If I make a movement around “wash your hands” and you join it, and then start washing your hands fifteen times a day, and also defend all of the founding fathers of the movement, then I sold you snake oil
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:30 PM
1

I told you exactly what happens: orientation shifts from short-term to long-term, for one you’ve already scratched the itch for short-term, for two your brain develops. You are rejecting that. The burden is on you to explain what you call “magic”, and “they can’t have casual sex with hot men” is a dogshit argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:25 PM
1

What? Do you even know what a straw man is? I gave you a perfectly acceptable argument, do i need to restate? I think you legitimately lack intelligence, please don’t reproduce if you can’t follow the exchange we’ve just had.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:21 PM
2

Most women who let men know of their laundry lists have an audience. You can exercise your first amendment rights with or without the audience, but at this point you are a homeless person who punches the air around him - who are you talking to? Right now you are talking to me, but if it wasn’t for me donating my time to angry guys online, who is it that is desperately trying to get with you in their 30s, or let alone 20s, or at all? Go and tell them that you don’t like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:14 PM
2

Most bad men who break rules (have a job, don’t have a criminal record, don’t be mean to people) don’t do so because they are charming womanizers - they do so because they are too retarded to follow them. When we talk about charming assholes, we are talking about a small minority of bad men. Yes or no? If no, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:08 PM
0

I am saying things are “magical” because I have to speak your language - my hypothesis is that women just age out of their party phase and choose to not pursue short-term gratification, your worldview remains a mystery: first you cried that women can no longer hookup with hot men in their 30s, we established this to be mostly untrue, and now you just keep pissing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:49 PM
3

Okay, you can continue the list all your want, but the truth is if we control for all of the above you have no argument other than “I don’t like it”. Fine, but most men in the communities that religiously disavow promiscuous women are barely invited to the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:44 PM
2

Yeah but then pursue women in their 20s, what is this habit of searching out the women who you say you don’t like and lecturing them on what you prefer. I don’t walk up to you with my laundry list of expectations and don’t tell you to live up to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:41 PM
1

You are gonna have to stop being emotional and start using the rational part of your brain. Yes, they magically stop in their 30s because they want something serious. Why else, since we’ve established that they can have all the hookups? Obviously, because they no longer want hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:31 PM
3

Your question presumes that the guy who can’t get any is a part of the conversation in the first place. The amount of weight people give your words correlates with how much you bring to the table, and any woman who hooked up brings more to the table than men who starve for box. So, to answer your question - who is it that is going to “not allow” women to have these standards? The dating standards police?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:21 PM
2

I am about to red-pill you so hard you are gonna cry: women can absolutely hookup with any category of men at any age, and the reason why they stop doing it in their 30s is because they start being more long-term oriented. You guys can piss shit and puke on PPD and complain that you didnt get your turn on her, but none of this is about you or your timeline. Your timeline is irrelevant to other people’s goals. By the way these women don’t prevent you from looking for a woman in her 20s, or a woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:14 PM
1

What would you say if some guy showed up in your life telling you ”look, I don’t kick puppies and have a job, I am a good guy, can I please fuck you in the ass?”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:05 PM
4

Who is going to ”not allow“ her to have these standards - the men who can barely get anybody in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:00 PM
10

Also, Jeff Bezos can absolutely find a young hot virgin, or whatever it is that you are obsessed with, which is why you say (or was it some other guy?) that Bezos has a bunch of nineteen year old side chicks, but I don’t expect you to be consistent anyways. Any high school is full of girls like that, who want to marry a top tier guy. What you require is not that rare to find, people like you just don’t check the boxes to qualify.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:40 PM
16

You are not doing “all that”. You are the mid hag complaining that nobody will do “all that“ for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:30 PM
12

Excuse me, this is a reflection of you not bringing enough to the table, because you know who does not have a problem with women refusing to adopt their feminine role? Jeff Bezos. If you are not top 10% of men, you failed to deliver. This might not be your fault, but women don’t care whose fault it is when you are over here crying that nobody is quitting their job or their degree at twenty-two to invest in your mediocrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:13 PM
28

The reason why women chase degrees and work 9 to 5 is so that they don’t have to fuck you for food and shelter. This is not even a personal attack, this is the actual technical motivation behind pursuit of financial goals: not wanting to reproduce with men we don’t like. When you say “working a 9 to 5” does not make her attractive to me, I’m not sure that you realize that being attractive to you is not the goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:27 PM
2

Not because she wants to become a single mom, and your ass is not excluded because you want to have children. You are excluded because you have bad genetics and are useless
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:55 PM
–

You mean to say, you don’t like it when Steve just inserts himself into your space time and complains your ears off?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:10 AM
–

“If the guy was balding, broke, or awkward, you would find his “emotional openness” annoying, pathetic, or even disgusting. But when you see 6"2 rich athletic Chad, suddenly him crying on your shoulder becomes this charming little feature you appreciate. Steve from IT doing the same thing? Ew get away from me.” Wait until OP finds out that some men can even have sex with us, but when this random fuck Steve from IT trauma dumps and touches our breasts it’s considered sexual harassment. Don’t you …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 11:57 PM
2

I am saying that women kill children more than men only because women are around children more than men are. If child spends 80-90% of time with women and 10% of time with men, the most likely candidate for murder will be a woman, dipshit. This is not an excuse, this is an intro to statistics. This is an explanation of your stat being irrelevant to the point you are trying to make. We need to eject people like you from this sub, please never reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 07:23 PM
3

Then why are you saying dumb shit? “Choose us better because we are degenerates” is not the dunk you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:25 PM
1

Hold up, let’s try to use the rational part of our brains for a second. The statistic of infanticide is skewed towards women because women are more likely to be long-term caretakers for infants. Men are just less likely to be in the position where they are in proximity to infants, so of course they’ll murder kids less frequently. If men were around children as much as women are, men would murder children at a much higher rate, of course. I need you to think about this and really understand this,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:18 PM
1

Yeah, you are too dumb to have human rights, or to reproduce. No woman is choosing men because she thinks “how great, this guy will make me a single mother”.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 01:10 PM
1

You have a low IQ. Women choosing badly is not an excuse or a counter argument against your gender being useless parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 01:09 PM
3

The reason why women kill children more often is because women take care of children much more often than men do, because men are not interested in parenting their children. I continuously see you misunderstanding statistics and being bad with logic on this sub, you said something stupid in some other post too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 01:08 PM
1

Where is the heavy labor part? It’s not like old or retarded people are all obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 01:05 PM
2

Even your examples uncover your biases - you think that everything that does not cater to you violates your boundaries. HealthyAtAnySIze or “stop slut shaming” Instagram posts is not an imposition of standards onto men - it’s a step away from men’s standards, irrespective of whether you find these people attractive. Trying to change the world would be walking up to men and lecturing how you guys must date a fat slut - the thing that men do to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 01:04 PM
2

Bro you are lucky to live in the age of OF, can you imagine if you had to do something to see a woman naked
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 03:06 AM
2

Depends on people involved. I am saying, with men‘s tendency to abandon their offsprings marriage-free cohabitation definitely does not work as of now, if the tendency did not exist, it would work or not work like any marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:59 AM
1

Thank you for demonstrating that women can compete with men even in terms of retardation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:52 AM
2

Divorce affecting children is not a counter argument against your gender not giving a fuck about your kids. This is like saying “water boils at 100C because the Earth is round”. These are two separate topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:50 AM
0

Women making the wrong choice is not a counter argument or an excuse to men not being interested in parenting their children. Disproportionately. In fact, it’s not a counter argument to anything bad that men do or don’t do. Congratulations for demonstrating that retardation defies the lines of gender and all pill colors, nice guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 12:55 AM
2

Why did it change and why do men go into it disproportionately, especially compared to social work or childcare?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 12:46 AM
2

Cohabitation and family without marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 12:41 AM
3

I am still somehow missing the link between divorce and investment in children. Women choose wrong men and divorce right men, therefore men are interested in parenting their kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 12:40 AM
2

I am confused, relate this one to my point for me please.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 09:00 PM
0

Who said ”everything”? I said a very specific thing is men’s fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:52 PM
5

Red pilled man thinks he is a special snowflake
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:49 PM
2

I would not know because I don‘t need either service.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:48 PM
3

I don’t know why we are arbitrarily drawing the line at bisexuality when we can say “don’t date men who‘ve been to prison”, or “don’t date men”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:47 PM
9

Why are you running your mouth like your input into humanity is of huge significance?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:42 PM
7

No man has to work in supply chain, law or infrastructure to be considered an individual and a citizen. If I made a post telling all office workers to go work blue collar jobs, or telling all creative professionals to go to law school, people would think I’m just memeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:41 PM
9

Yes but when someone like you needs help wiping their ass a male social worker does not show up to help you out.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:37 PM
3

You are missing a huge elephant in the room - all of this would work and would be completely fair if men gave a fuck about their kids, but as practice shows they are too busy virtue signaling about family values online, like some figures from our current administration. Most baby daddies will just run off.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:30 PM
0

Apologies
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:23 PM
5

Gay men should not date men because this is how they’ll get HIV? STDs have never been a top concern when it comes to these discussions. The top concern is that bisexual men do not abide by a standard of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:23 PM
2

I don’t care, just don’t do bro science
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:14 PM
1

I would. But apparently it’s true that most women have reservations.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:35 PM
12

Saying that women should not date bisexual men because of STDs just exposes low levels of intellligence, along with bashing sluts because of STDs while encouraging men to be promiscuous. Well this is half of our country who thinks this way, and these people are allowed to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:34 PM
3

No single factor determines anything about the person, but some will be dealbreakers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:27 PM
1

Bro come on bffr
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:04 AM
–

Since when does your subjective desire to pursue [sinful action] factor into the amount of social leeway you get? It does not follow at all, and it does not happen outside the time when people need to shame women into their respective gender role. Also, no Christian says men are allowed to be promiscuous but yet somehow there was a brothel in every town bro, and somehow hookers died of abortions before the Daily Wire accused feminists of normalizing baby holocaust. Men didn’t create religions in…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:05 PM
3

Who is lining up to build life with you? Where are all the women that you are rejecting in your head?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:50 PM
4

How old is your girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:47 PM
1

Damn you are a king of debate. I like you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:28 PM
1

He is the one who squealed. Traitor to the first amendment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:26 PM
1

You are afraid of investing and losing your investment. I told you exactly what your problem is. Yes, adults routinely use hints and resort to indirect communication. 🤦🏼‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:25 PM
1

You are pussyfooting right now and I’m losing my patience. Where else? In any intimate relationship, all the time. Yesterday, today, tomorrow, 24/7. You are not principally opposed to governments involvement in anything, the true reason why you don’t want to get married is because you know that you’d lose something of value to you (understandable fear, by the way, not like I don’t empathize with your reservations), but you are too emotional to admit it and walk it back.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 03:18 PM
1

Nevermind then, this is stupid. I judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 05:19 AM
2

“Aaand, you are self-absorbed, and mean, and they are all actually rich, and you will die alone at 35!”. It’s okay, I’ll explain. The reason why they won’t pay for coffee is because they want women to recognize their inherent value - like you do right now - but are too emotional and delusional to ask themselves what specific traits or elements constitute this value. Basically, soying out like a bunch of chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 05:02 AM
6

Giving someone you are meh about a shot - you know, doing the thing you guys are begging us to do - is not the same as intentionally wasting yours and someone else’s evening for food. This does not make sense to do in the first world. This is some memes from Somalia. This is fanfiction by men who project their mentality onto women (“how I would exploit people if I was actually fuckable”). Cock carousel and whatever else you are paranoid about belongs to the same bucket. If you want women to only…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:52 AM
3

You should ask and tell us what they say
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 03:59 AM
4

Don’t you know, a high value man is the man who will never spend the money he doesn’t have on the woman he can’t attract
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 03:57 AM
1

This just doesn’t follow at all. Your subjective self-worth has nothing to do with the objective reality of what you can or can’t get, and some women can’t get the men who check their boxes and are loyal, so they have to play games.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 03:55 AM
-1

Yes. You have to be very well off, otherwise, no offense, but it’s too much hustle to tolerate all this shit slinging and cynicism for food. I am not trying to be mean, but your response, your questions and your assumptions, are a little disconnected from how little women want to deal with men they do not find attractive. No, we haven’t all been on dates with men that we dislike for free food. We don’t like most men enough to tolerate you guys for price of a meal. This isn’t the Great Depression…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 03:48 AM
1

He was a redpiller and I thought redpillers like freedom of speech
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 03:38 AM
1

Yeah, you are evaluating these things from a perspective of an attractive woman with option.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 02:33 AM
1

You think strategic bitchiness is an example of this? 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 02:19 AM
0

Speaking of AF/BB, this paranoia of red-pilled men about being placed in the beta blokes category is a delusion. A month ago, before some retard squealed on me for calling him a retard and I got put on a timeout, I had a long argument with men who were willing to die on the hill of not paying for a girl‘s coffee on the first date, they foamed at the mouth like rabid dogs and were interrogating me what I (a beautiful woman) bring to the table. All men who are afraid of women using them for money …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 02:07 AM
2

Then be mad. You joined the scene oriented towards short-term relationships with a bunch of thirsty dudes of varying levels of attractiveness swiping right on the same minority of women who are willing to give out box with no strings attached, the nature of dating apps does not allow to select for anything other than looks, everybody plays weird games and is non-committal, AND you have a shit genetics. Why would any sane individual expect a different outcome and be so emotional.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 01:50 AM
1

Do you know what a pickme is? Can you define it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 11:35 PM
1

There are some very uncomfortable places underneath this that you don’t want to dig into. I am going to dig into these places. Why die on this hill of no marriage if all it is just dumb jewelry? It’s just jewelry, bro, let your chick have it. Does not have to be an expensive piece. When was the last time you were principally opposed to the government gun as a form of backing to your self-interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 10:19 PM
–

For many reasons. First, it’s impossible to maintain long-term interest in a man or a woman who worships you 24/7. This is a chemistry killer. Second, by putting this as a requirement all they are doing is weeding out very cool people from the dating pool and inviting crazies, for no upside other than providing emotional reinforcement for their shaky sense of self-worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:48 PM
1

Then what is this even for, and who is it targeted at? I seriously don’t understand who you people think you are talking to. We would all pick attractive, financially well off and commitment-oriented partners if we could, but these people are in a limited supply. For some women, it means they will compromise on the “commitment-oriented“ part and then will have to eat up the inevitable consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:22 PM
1

The evidence is all the reasons why you are hesitant to get married (if you are hesitant). You are the evidence. The guy next to you is the evidence. So is the fictional guy in the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:56 PM
1

Girl, they are not desperate, they are shooting above their league. If they were desperate they would look for some loser who will commit. This is different. You don’t need to normatively load this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:19 PM
1

Marriage or a lack of it indicates man’s level of investment in a particular woman, so everything else is going to be downstream from here: for many women, this has practical implications in case the relationship does not work out, for rich women, this might just be a sign that the guy takes her seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:18 PM
–

The women who describe their preferred relationship dynamic as some guy being obsessed are dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 07:37 PM
1

This is the reality of how attractive men tend to act, and of what works 🤦🏼‍♀️ Not everybody has leverage to negotiate the kind of relationship they want with the kind of guy they want in a way that is honest and straightforward.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 07:32 PM
1

No. More physically attractive and financially stable men also tend to be less committal. This is just a byproduct of him having lots of women to pick from. If there is a big delta between what the woman in question brings to the table and what the guy in question supplies, she will have to compensate with psychological warfare, same thing is true if dynamic is flipped. I am trying to word this as neutrally as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 07:20 PM
0

Men never bring up their struggles to actually solve them, they bring them up to make counter-feminist points.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:53 PM
1

The other way around. This is choosing someone who you want and who does not want you, to put it blunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:50 PM
0

Not for every single woman, but for a woman in the scenario she presented: the one who invests too much of herself and never gets commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:49 PM
1

It depends on who we are talking about - if you want a woman to cook you meals and raise children, she is going to seek a financial safety net.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:43 PM
1

We are solving it, by deploying psychological weapons and manipulations to get a desired outcome. That is the solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:30 PM
3

This is just memes at this point. I got nothing to say, you are just slinging shit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:06 PM
1

He does, he just does not want to commit 🙂. We can excuse anything away with “just be single”, but being single is not a preferred scenario for overwhelming majority of us
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:04 PM
7

The goal is to ensure that your vision is shared, not be a passive aggressive bitch and make petty acts of revenge if it’s not shared 🤦🏼‍♀️. You are assuming that this girl fucking around was malicious
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:02 PM
1

Versus, what, 60%, and no financial ties that can keep her afloat?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:53 PM
2

Men and women are different. If men‘s standards got harsher, women would just suck it up and adjust their expectations the way they always suck it up and adjust their expectations when men dominate the dating market. When you are trying to uno reverse our current situation and fantasize of women hoarding the online communities with vile shit, you are writing fanfiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:25 PM
9

If you think it’s beneath you to have a conversation of expectations, keep making assumptions and keep being mad when they are not shared. Your preferred blueprint is no longer the default.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:19 PM
1

Vice versa. If my goal is to just get married I can pick up a local incel loser and go to the courthouse tomorrow, if I am interested in a better catch - well, the better catch is going to be harder to catch, especially if their value is high relative to mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:15 PM
1

Works well if it’s strategic
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:03 PM
1

Because coochie stock goes down its female owner stays in the relationship, and dick stock goes up while its male owner stays in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:02 PM
2

Feminism worked hard to achieve things that are only tangentially related to decline in marriage, which is opening avenues for women outside of being fuckable. I have never met a feminist who is principally opposed to marriage at 23 and thinks it’s weird (besides you).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:55 PM
0

What a high IQ response: “just pick better”. The reality is that most people don’t get to maximize every single desirable traits in a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:48 PM
1

What does it have to do with a guy being an asshole, or a girl’s intellect?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:46 PM
0

if he does not bring much to the table and wants to fuck, he does have to be manipulative. The difference is, I guess, the nobility of the goal: the forever girlfriend is already being used and is looking for some form of payback, the fuckboy is looking to exploit people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:43 PM
0

Only a guy will equate being vocal about what you are looking for to bullying men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:40 PM
1

You are a retard. You legitimately should be ejected from gene pool for being that dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 02:34 PM
1

I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 02:32 PM
0

I know you don’t have to follow them, nor am I going to be left behind. Someone is getting way too emotional
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 02:32 PM
1

Of course it was about utility - any woman provides you a sense of your validity as a man, her childbearing function, sex. When you say “my ex had nothing” you are saying “my ex had nothing to offer besides what she is already supposed to be providing”. I sound sensible, both of you think of yourselves as better people than you actually are. Not at all cold, just not delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 05:52 PM
1

I know it’s not necessary, because this is not a system of values - it’s a dating preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:23 PM
1

🤦🏼‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:20 PM
1

I know this makes men feel entitled to her body - the delusion that a small thing has to lead to the large thing immediately is a part of the issue. Respectfully, all of you are too poor to be of interest to gold diggers: I have to fight you over like <$50, which golddigger would realistically go for that. Regarding investing time - it could indicate a level of investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:19 PM
–

Bro be acting cool like he stopped replying first, but this is like farting in an elevator and pointing at the other person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:57 AM
–

Misandry moment alert. Because their sexual strategy is already priced into their mental image of the world. When he says women provide no utility, what it means, is women provide no utility beyond the utility that they are already supposed to provide, duh. When you ask him what in his mind is the definition of a woman with nothing that he is willing to appreciate, he will tell you that a woman with nothing is his age or a little younger, childless, not excessively promiscuous, not overweight, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:54 AM
–

Oh, yeah, I’ll debrief everyone on our dialogue tree. This animal kept insisting tons of men, unlike materialistic shallow females, get in a relationship with women with a ”net negative utility” to themselves - that is, purely because of some abstract appreciation of her. I told him, there is no such thing as choosing to date a woman with a negative utility value. If I attach a dildo to a chair and he elects to sit in this chair, it does not mean he has this apparent appreciation for the mechani…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:28 AM
4

“people”. bro, come on
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 01:30 AM
5

It’s the fact that you need to share with us. The act itself is not creepy, your post is 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 01:08 AM
1

Basically an “if he wanted to, he would”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:38 AM
1

Ashlee 😂💀 and her tragedee
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:15 AM
1

I don’t know how else to explain that your whining bout “agape” is just functional utility if we break it down with a sharp philosophical scalpel. No man looks at a woman and says to himself “man, I’d really like to appreciate her as a person” - the very intention of having a woman in your life is some form of exercising of your reproductive strategy. You are saying moronic, idealistic nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:42 PM
1

Party game: take a shot every time this dude says “agape”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:23 PM
1

You found the wrong chick to condescend on, because I fancy myself as a part-time philosopher. You aren’t going to volunteer to be in a relationship with someone when net utility is negative to you - this is a nonsensical scenario. If I attach a dildo to a chair and you elect to sit in this chair, it doesn’t mean you are appreciating the mechanics. It means that you derive enjoyment from a dildo up your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:42 PM
1

women on two X chromosomes are unhinged
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:55 PM
0

The men who passively drop out of the dating market while actively posting about their passive walkaway on social media. Silly me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:54 PM
8

And how do people know that they drop out if they do so passively? How do women on AskFeminists even find out?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:31 PM
1

If committed relationships provide negative utility to the kinds of men women are attracted, then these men simply don’t date and don‘t commit - which coincidentally happens to be one of the classic red-pilled observations. No man will commit to a woman because of “agape” - Chad can sure appreciate me, but I’m only getting in a relationship with him if I am blond and fit and 20-30. None of this is maturity related. You can’t just call behaviors that don’t benefit your reproductive strategy as im…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:07 PM
1

Then don’t ask anyone out and be mad. I spent way too much of my hotspot explaining exactly why it makes sense and the rationale behind this: you stating over and over again that you think it’s stupid, or unfair, or archaic, shows that this insurmountable financial barrier does its job correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:56 PM
1

Just for you, just for you I opened another tab and pulled quotes out from OP’s comments so that you can have front row seats to this: “Marriage is for simps and psychological children.” “I don't market myself to anyone. I'm not an object to be bought. If anything, women should "market" themselves to me as partners.” Sprinkled with the hysterical laughing emojis. And you can say “why does it mean he doesn’t want to do anything?”, and my response will be, because the only things I keep hearing is…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:51 PM
1

You are lecturing me about this as if I don’t understand that dropping mad $ on a date is not necessarily a positive reflection of a man’s character. But a refusal to drop $20 is necessarily a negative reflection of a man’s character. Why? You probably read your way down my dialogue tree with OP - this is a good cross section of the anatomy of this type of guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:39 PM
0

If dating women provided men with a negative utility, men wouldn’t be dating women. You are not the selfless hero you say you are, chill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:24 PM
3

The ”doesn’t have“ is a good point: only a man will be paranoid about women using hI’m as a betabux when he doesn’t even have any money.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 07:27 PM
-1

I do. Every woman notices, not every woman will turn down a guy just because he doesn’t pay, there is some rabid girl who texted under every one of my replies here - yes, she makes a note too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:15 PM
2

You do know you don’t have to invite anyone on the date, and when you do, you become a willing participant in the back and forth you are complaining about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:13 PM
0

Any woman who is with you is going to be interested in what utility you are providing to her (doesn’t have to be financial), not a single person in the world has any abstract interest in your character, especially if you roll in with five red pilled beliefs. Some of you haven’t been humbled enough by your parents. Are you yourself willing to disconnect your relationships with women from utility these women provide? Of course not, this is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:04 PM
1

I can cook, or I can plan surprises, or I can get married, or I can have sex and be pregnant, or I can play video games, or I can even pay for your goddamn coffee - in other words, I don’t show up with an attitude, expecting a constant stream of one-sided favors. We can’t even get to the part of what I can do because you are too busy explaining in various expressions why exactly you won’t do anything while others should. I agree that’s embarrassing for women to be entitled, and you chose to join…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:53 PM
2

Yes, correct, the point is, we can satisfy our own needs independently from one another but we still want to couple up - “you are emancipated but you still want us to pay for dates” isn’t the dunk on feminism conservatives think it is. For the same reason why “you are an independent human being but you still want me to have sex with you or make your meals” is not an argument against anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:46 PM
2

The feminists don’t get to determine the value of their time - the market does. ”Who pays” has little to do with women being this way or that way, having money or not, being capable of covering their bills or totally helpless. A man is perfectly capable of jerking off independently from us or fucking another man, but he still wants a woman, typically.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 04:31 PM
2

Men and women don’t have to be the same in your worldview for it to be coherent, but their differences must not be at counterpurposes. Just try to imagine the world where everybody abides by your values, what does it even look like? Any attempt at implementation has to either violate the first part “men should fuck around” or the second one “women shouldn’t“. This isn’t a “system”, and the requests within it aren’t “values”, it’s some muddy thought soup. To put it blunt, you are just stomping ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 04:13 PM
3

Three things. Following established etiquette will never get you opportunities, but your refusal to do so can cost you opportunities, especially if the girl can tell that it’s a principled stance like in OP’s case. An act of paying the bill is not buying affection, it‘s an act of signaling your willingness to take care of her, and that you are prepared to bear a cost to have her in your life. A coffee and a croissant is not enough to buy affection anyways, let’s be for real. In OP’s case him not…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 03:59 PM
3

Which points is this a response to? Who are you talking to? What do you think is the point I’m making, what do you think is a subject matter of this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 03:29 PM
8

And if you are talking to a cannibal woman she has a value that she should be able to bite your head off after sex. You can’t brand any delusion, standard, or a request as a “value” - your values have to be congruent with the fabric of your world view. “Men should be promiscuous but women shouldn’t“ is an incongruent fallacious thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:21 PM
3

It’s not about your refusal to pay for food, it‘s your refusal to do anything and high expectations that go along with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:12 PM
5

You are the parasitic NPC some woman has to weed out. You are admitting to expecting people to entertain you with no investments on your part, you are crying that women are still in the hesitation stage while you don’t bother to make yourself marketable to anybody, you think costly commitments make you into a simp and your overall attitude is exactly that of the worst kind of woman. Except you don’t even have the childbearing skills or positive feedback from the opposite sex to logically back an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 01:20 PM
2

I am upset that I end up being dragged down these overly emotional dialogue trees with people who can’t manage their reactions to uncomfortable trufs. If you disagree substantively, you are free to not pay for dates, or voice this disagreement, but being outraged and calling someone “anti-humane” is bitch-made behavior, contrary to all your barking about your independence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 01:15 PM
3

You don’t just get to say you are the prize, this needs to be confirmed by your environment. So far, you are explicitly refusing to do the things that would make a man a prize.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 01:06 PM
13

Which part of this is pick-me?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:20 PM
2

Yaskween, slay. That’s exactly how things should be: people should rush to market themselves as partners to a kween who doesn’t bother marketing himself as a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:15 PM
2

Your independent thought lies so far in proudly bragging about not wanting to do something with a Disney villain laughter at the end - it sure is independent, in a sense that it’s disconnected from where other people are. Your inventions need to be actually productive for you to get a credit as an original thinker, otherwise it’s just schizophrenia.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:10 PM
3

Stinginess in men and greediness in women are attraction killers for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:04 PM
–

You aren't marketing yourself as a partner, you are doing this masturbation thing with a big of a stick up your ass about not being taken advantage of, and it’s extremely obvious to anyone across the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:55 AM
–

What a retard. If I show up on a date trumpeting my unwillingness to show small signs of attention and manners I will become a one time use only material, and I know this, but this retard thinks - I don’t know what the fuck he thinks. The truth is, there is an established etiquette for men and for women, and you can deviate from the script, but people might take it against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:44 AM
0

Where do you see neurodivergence in the title of the post? You seriously must be thinking this is a personal therapy session for your set of frustrations and concerns
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:36 AM
-4

I am not your therapist
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:35 AM
5

I don‘t know about other men who are arguing with me, but the goal is to filter out specifically you, and not because of free food. This food thing is symptomatic of your unwillingness to invest in anything since you are conflating this with being pussy-whipped, and your stance on marriage is another data point to establish the pattern. While you carry around all these things you are not willing to do, ranging from “paying for her coffee” to “marrying her”, you are perfectly comfortable lecturin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:34 AM
3

You are just pulling all these opinions from your rear, while I’m telling you: this counts. Everything you do or don‘t do counts as it communicates your status, levels of desperation, level of interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:18 AM
3

The post is about having or not having a car.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:13 AM
-1

They can’t, but they try to. They are getting it right in OPs case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:11 AM
7

“Don’t care” is too loaded. Everyone goes on dates with people they are not fully invested in - if they were fully invested, there wouldn’t be a point in a date. Just skip all the courting and propose on the first date, if you care about your tinder match, unlike a shallow human like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:10 AM
1

If you do or don’t offer to pay, this might be a data point that either establishes a pattern in her mind, or breaks a bad pattern. For example, I feel like the guy doesn’t want to be proactive in the relationship because he never texted me, and doesn’t open the door in front of me or some bullshit, and then I think to myself “but he did cover the bill” as oppose to “he is poorly raised and tries to hookup with minimal effort”. It’s a small thing, but all things are small when looked at on their…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:05 AM
1

Pretty much, yeah, that’s a very realistic thought pattern for women: “what if I was dependent on this dude?” Everybody is a shallow human being, your gender especially, specifically because you guys barely think of long-term. What a dumb jab to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:59 AM
5

The point of paying for ice cream is not a free ice cream. I wouldn’t spend two or three hours on a date with you if my goal is to extract a $7.99 ice cream, this is not a reasonable cost-benefit analysis. It‘s a proxy for other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:54 AM
2

Most importantly they don’t have conditions that prevent them from getting a car if they need one. OP does. He brings a bigger issue to the table than any other guy or girl who doesn’t have a car - the issue of his technical inability to operate one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:45 AM
0

We don’t actively think these things through, no. If this is your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:37 AM
8

Cringe. Why would she care about you, this is the first date. This is where you show why the other person should care. You are kind of approaching this with a level of entitlement to someone’s heart and soul, as oppose to what it is - the stage where you market yourselves to one another. Second of all, the goal of paying for food is not free food, it’s to figure out whether you see her as a long-term asset, and whether you are willing to be active in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:35 AM
4

Every single woman notices this and makes a mental note. It’s a point base system like everything else, not paying for dates does not bar anyone from dating just by itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:13 AM
3

They aren’t making posts on Reddit telling us they have conditions that limit their ability to get a car.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 10:02 AM
4

These women don’t have anxiety, depression or OCD. They just don’t have a car as a lifestyle choice. You can’t manage having a car. There is a difference. You aren’t less of a man - I don’t know what that even means - but you do bring extra logistical issues to the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:46 AM
5

Well this is why women plan for these things at the beginning and don’t date a guy without a car.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:41 AM
27

If you are doing it continuously with no return - yes, it’s a waste of time. That being said, You paying the bill at the end of the night factors into her impression of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:38 AM
5

Every coomer be complaining about these false rape accusations and family courts as if he harvests mad poon and hoards millions in his bank account and this actually affects him personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:23 PM
8

The vector of your thought is correct - men can be helped not by the virtue of being men via tax breaks, but by making low-wage labor a more reasonable career option. Stuff like available education, unions and minimum wage for tradesmen, and, you know what else will help out men to be more marriageable? Health insurance for hourly blue collar workers and their dependents. If any hospital bill leads a household to financial shipwreck, of course women will have reservations about getting pregnant.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:13 PM
1

Not a red pill man tone policing, no shot :/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 08:05 PM
2

No, excuse me, when we have conversations about male loneliness, an example “male loneliness” can not be “a 6’4” guy with a social life who gets to bang one chick a month”. This is the question of definitions. When you are commenting what you commented, you are sanewashing this OP’s friend’s mishap as a valid concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 07:52 PM
2

I don’t understand why you are typing these wholesome things about male loneliness, that could stand on their own, under the post where a dude says that his friend only gets one poon a month to bang. That is not my framing, that is your choice of time and place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 07:12 PM
5

So after the throat clearing of “well, of course we aren’t going to force anybody…” you proceeded to post «This mentality of "not my problem" is not helpful for society. If you live in a society, it is your problem.” in the context of dude complaining he does not get to satisfy his sexual impulse casually at the expense of strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 06:54 PM
3

Excuse me, marriage has been as much of a status quo as men’s ability to get sex, because men are not dumb and will not build an actually sexually conservative society that they say they want - this society has never existed and will never exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 06:20 PM
8

No, we understood you perfectly: you are under impression that provisioning of sex is a civic responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 06:05 PM
7

We need to reevaluate whether we allow all men in the society to have keyboards, because stuff like that is what ends up on the internet:”hey, it’s your own job to figure out your sex life“ - “let’s pull welfare from people!”, while he makes average income and doesn’t make any spectacular contributions to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 06:01 PM
6

Yeah, you can say that with validity if we had a pandemic of women inserting themselves in discussions demanding commitment from men who are busy pursuing other things in life. Women don’t typically act this way, or at least that’s not popular enough to be a meme. You are tying to both sides this issue, and there no room for both siding it - yes, it’s just your gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:56 PM
10

This is just an exhibit A of what entitlement looks like: “me not getting laid is the start of society’s downfall”. Let’s eject you guys from the society then, you obviously have a distorted view of who owes what to whom.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:51 PM
6

I wouldn’t know how often your friend gets laid because I am not going clubbing with you guys: some men report having a tough time, some say there are enough women who are into casual once you learn the game and have confidence. Now, men approach the world with this sense of entitlement to strangers helping them fulfill their life missions. This particular dude’s current mission is to get laid. Instead of asking women why they don’t understand something and don’t engage with something, ask yours…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:30 PM
1

Depends on how they are approaching these women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 02:46 PM
13

Men should do what’s good for men independently of what women think. Many men want relationships with women. Therefore, they should pursue them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 03:01 AM
1

You are the cattiest girl on the sub, kween
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 02:57 AM
1

Which side are you, because or now you evidence is “well it’s just common”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 11:09 PM
–

Emm, yes, you dipshit, in order to be “okay with being a side chick“ the woman needs to consent to this scenario, otherwise it’s just people fucking, or her secretly hoping to lock you down - which is still a confirmation that she is not okay with the current state of affairs. We need to filter low IQ men out from the ret of society, cuz holy shit
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 11:06 PM
2

Therefore they are not okay with being a side chick
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 11:03 PM
-1

I don‘t want to dignify this with good faith engagement
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:38 AM
3

So, that‘s not being a side chick, that is people fucking you and the guy next to you, and the guy next to the previous guy, without any commitment on either side. Which is fine, but when you call this being a side chick, you are overselling the relationship status with these seven women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:59 PM
1

How do you know? How do you guys know everything?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:49 PM
2

This guy is making a pretty bold claim, and the amount of proof he has to provide is more than just a story of his friend Jeremiah spinning plates.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:49 PM
-2

Then we have two competing anecdotes, and mine will sound smarter.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:27 PM
8

Personal experience? Where at you guys pulling this info from?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:24 PM
4

Is this personal experience, or?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:23 PM
1

Can we ban random fucks who deputize themselves as enforcers of accountability for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:13 AM
3

Well, this is super uncomfortable, but a boyfriend is not a husband, and your girlfriend is free to leave once chemistry wears off. If you expect the level of loyalty where woman forgoes any potential connection for the sake of longevity - you propose. She may still leave, but at least you won’t sound like a moron complaining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:08 AM
1

So tone deaf. Like, who are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:00 AM
1

Okay, did you skip the part where I said stuff about fertility issues due to structural rearrangement, and where I specified that to be a prerequisite multiple times, or is your comment taking that into consideration?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:07 AM
1

No one survives. You can‘t do anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:04 AM
0

You can complain about any idea this way, if you are paranoid about its outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:47 PM
0

What do you mean? I mean, if there is an issue relate to man’s technical ability to become a father. Not if a woman just decides to use someone else’s sperm for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 04:36 PM
1

Cheating? Sexual selectiveness? Abortions? Pre-natal screening?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 04:31 PM
1

Yes, having a mess of a child is usually not a favorable option. Which actions that accomplish said goal are you criticizing?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 04:23 PM
2

I am not defending OP’s friends, I want to totally separate myself from women who marry the guy and cuck him as a life strategy. I am addressing your general point about women’s tendency to push for forms of eugenics: please elaborate on what exactly you mean by that before people put words in your mouth? The situation in the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:57 PM
0

So, if this man has a genetic issue and a couple is looking at the sperm donor option, the guy always has an option to mindfuck himself in the position where he acts like he is the one who is doing his woman a favor by “allowing“ her to get pregnant by someone else. This can be expressed through words and actions: “this child is not genetically mine, we only went through this because you wanted to be a mother, therefore it’s your burden to carry” is the position average man will take. This is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:38 PM
1

In my circumstance, being an adult would mean not mindfucking yourself in a convenient position where you look like the guy who does someone a favor by allowing them to become a mother. In these women‘s circumstance, being an adult would mean walking away from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:08 PM
1

This is actually a reality for me, and not by choice - we have to take donor sperm due to structural rearrangement on my husband‘s chromosomes, unless we want to have a disabled child. Your friends are volunteering to be in my shoes for no reason. They are retards. I can’t believe these dumb broads are 28 and 29. Insults aside, your friends are just theorizing, and their opinions remain to be opinions of people who do not have to commit to this circumstance. When this becomes your situation, whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:45 PM
-1

Im just saying it’s not a reasonable comparison to put it alongside FGM, but maybe I was wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 12:20 PM
2

I am not under the delusion that FGM happens in the West. Ok, maybe MGM needs to stop
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 12:17 PM
0

What does this question have to do with my comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:59 PM
3

Why do men keep asking women for advice on the situation that women will never find themselves in due to being women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:41 PM
1

Just like most men‘s, your sense of proportion, scale and relevancy is contorted - you of course think that FGM is an issue, but you think MGM is an equivalent issue, and you don’t feel stupid putting these two things in the same sentence. You of course think that disrespecting anyone‘s body is wrong, but your best example of male body being disrespected is verbal commentary.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:38 PM
1

Any possible motivation that makes people pursue people who are much lower in value is not gonna look pretty. There is a reason why mothers and fathers send their daughters to college and not to the nearest gas station.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:30 PM
5

Do we need to install parental control on your phones and keep you away from the internet??
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 11:19 PM
0

It does not come before other things because he didn’t approach her. In any case, it’s not clear why he is supposed to care about her whole life in the first place. You are blowing this nothing sandwich out of proportion, like, a lot. Are you jealous that you are not getting approached enough or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:44 PM
6

I am not sure why you think women’s goal is to capitalize on their looks. This is a classic male projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:52 AM
5

Pass a note to her through the waiter?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:36 AM
4

Penis does not come first in OPs case because he is asking about etiquette. If he only cared about getting laid he would not have asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:33 AM
6

No, I think there is something else going on. Most of these fit, young people are in monogamous relationships, even if they fuck up and cheat, they don’t do it serially and as a matter of habit. This sounds like a bunch of bored housewives with much older husbands, and hot rich husbands with housewives who let themselves go.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:48 PM
5

You technically could, If you are paired up with someone who is so far below you in market value, that they understand they have to make huge compromises.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:42 PM
6

So, OP is selecting for hot, rich and bored segment on population?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:30 PM
25

Is it a high end gym or a planet fitness?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 03:58 PM
1

I am not insulting you, I‘m telling you that your view of legal system is underdeveloped.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 02:35 PM
1

No, not all complaints by men are whining, but yours are - you are the typical gullible guy who does not know anything about anything and just pisses himself saying dumb shit. Please, get educated on the subject before arguing about legal system
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:08 AM
1

And you are whiny on top of it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 02:55 AM
1

You know nothing about the legal system. You are a retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:14 PM
1

I’m sorry, I might have made a generalization. Don’t take it personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:03 PM
1

Exist like pigs. Of course not everybody, but many do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:20 PM
1

Respectfully, number of followers has nothing to do with legitimacy of Trumpism
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:56 PM
1

Court will assume that consent was given until otherwise is proven, just changing your mind later won’t cut it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:40 PM
3

You have no idea whether the allegations are false or not, and her being a whore or wanting to get money from him has nothing to do with the question at hand. You are an example of why everyone treats your bunch like retards: your whole thought process is just bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:36 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with wanting to extract money from a sexual assault case, given that the charges aren’t made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:24 PM
-1

Because women aren’t expressing what they want overtly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 12:41 PM
1

You want to have too many children, you require her to be much younger, or much more good-looking then you, you are very authoritarian in temperament and expect your word to be final 100% of the time on everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 10:54 AM
2

I understand that the women who have time to dick around with friends and discretionary income to go to yoga classes will be expected to provide 100% of domestic labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 10:41 AM
6

Talking to each other requires mutual effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 10:24 AM
1

I think so. Assuming that you don’t try to sneak in a bunch of other very costly hidden conditions associated with her characteristics, or the burden of housework.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 10:19 AM
2

The SAHM mother will put 100% of effort from 9 to 5 while her husband is at work, but when he is off the clock, it’s reasonable to have him help out with household duties - on evenings and weekends. The benefit is that someone picks up 100% of it while the other person is out working, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:57 AM
3

I just googled - average salary is $66k, I don’t see how it would be affordable to drop 30k on a live-in help.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:40 AM
3

100% of housework is of course more than 100% of family income. If we convert mom‘s labor into dollars, most men could never afford to hire her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:00 AM
3

It obviously is not going to be 50/50 if man is a sole provider, it can’t be. Can it be 50/50 past five o’clock?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:44 AM
7

Making money is useful, and making money is also a baseline for running the family - a prerequisite if you will. It‘s reasonable to say that dad needs nine hours in a day five days a week to make money. What is happening on the weekends and evenings?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:27 AM
3

For clarity: in couples where men work all day to provide a roof over a woman’s head I think we cut some slack - there are some men who dedicate all hours in a day to their career. The women who complain about having to clean are usually not married to these people. The typical situation is something like this: dad clocks out at 5:00, and mom is expected to do her share of responsibilities 24/7 because he considers his part done.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:23 AM
-4

Men are not like women - they cannot and do not learn on their own. You need to actually take their hand and guide them through life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:11 AM
16

Holy shit, this one for sure did not cross her mind before filing for divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:08 AM
17

She is afraid to start over, but she is afraid to start over for a good reason. After all, she has two children. Weird comment to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:55 AM
1

This depends on a woman, depends on how you word it and how much she is into you, maybe she’ll laugh it off and find it cute, maybe she’ll blacklist you. I wouldn’t hold this lie against you because I find it innocuous, but that’s me, I might be in a majority or in a minority. I truly don’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 09:50 PM
1

I lost the train of thought. What are we arguing about anyways?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:50 AM
1

If a woman can’t tell a guy is a virgin and he lies, I don’t see what she loses. I think this benefits both.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:48 AM
1

I have no idea. Most men don’t report being privileged
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:47 AM
4

Whatever is handed is not always a good deal. I can hand you a cock up your ass on the silver platter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 08:45 PM
6

Your opinion about women’s struggles remains an opinion of someone who does not have to face these struggles about people who do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:35 PM
2

If you go around advertising that nobody wanted you before, that’s a sure way to implant negative thoughts in women’s heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:29 PM
2

In the end of the day, this has to be measured in something, and you are playing tennis without the net.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 03:40 PM
13

Just don’t talk about it if you happen to remain a virgin at 30. Lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 03:35 PM
1

It’s hard to separate out money from its effects. Rich people are just more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:24 PM
2

Yes. In these relationships, door swings both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:17 PM
6

If dating was easy, no man would struggle with it, obviously. Not really a privilege, it’s just different. A lot of redpillers who claim being a woman is life on easy mode would have been the type of woman they say they hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:45 PM
6

🥹❤️
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 05:46 PM
35

If i was a man I think I’d be a loser. I’ve no idea what I would do - maybe, I’d work twice as hard on looking for social outlets, it’s really important for access to women. I am not sure if I would try to be a good partner 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 02:13 PM
1

Guess I wasn't that far off when I compared you to an astrology crystal girl, huh. If yellow woman cheats, isn’t it the evidence that her guy did not “build the island”? Why cry wolf and shift blame onto her?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 08:57 PM
1

Soyspagetti does not understand why you are introducing her personality type as a variable at all, this should not be relevant in the world where you are a man that satisfies woman’s hypergamous impulse. If you picked a “pink” or “yellow” woman, she would cheat on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 08:23 PM
1

Our society actually thinks there is nothing wrong with attaching a price tag to female sexuality or parasocial relationships: we’ve always had courtesans, porn actresses, playboy bunnies, concubines, all of it is fine… As long as there is some Harvey Weinstein or Hugh Hefner profiting off of it. Mass hysteria starts when woman gets to be in the driver‘s seat and makes her own bag. Never forget the period in time when all of the people above were fangirling for Andrew Tate, this was a perfect ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 08:12 PM
1

“It does not end with sex at the end. The sex at the end is after” I thought she won’t look the other way because you are the greatest guy who appeals to her hypergamy, now she won’t look away because she has a “green” personality type and is especially loyal?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:51 PM
1

You are a very convenient husband, ”accountability” in your household means verbal back and forth a sex with her orgasm at the end. Your partner can cuck you any time she wants, and this will be your fault since you didn’t build some island and failed to appeal to her hypergamy. On top of it, you make six figures, what she does with her time - I don’t know. You are the most self-hating male feminist I’ve ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:32 PM
1

You don’t hold your partner accountable - you are giving her license to cuck you the moment you fail to live up to her expectations. You are tripping over your own belief matrix in every paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:13 PM
1

Just a hypothetical: if a woman cheats on a man, what should he do?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:39 PM
–

Sorry, I might have read something that you didn’t imply
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:21 PM
3

Buddy, you are not MGTOW if you have to be MGTOW. You are not going your own way, you are sent your own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:15 PM
1

Why draw the line there in your analysis and why assign yourself with a responsibility to draw the line? 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:59 PM
0

Technically, you are more likely to do all of these things compare to me, because you are a man 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:47 PM
–

For the last time: just because you file for divorce, does not mean the circumstances that led up to it are your fault. We also need to ban low IQ dumbfucks from this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:33 PM
1

I am forced go to into society and interact with you, but I am not picking apart every dumb decision you made in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:31 PM
1

I don’t know, I’m not in the habit of telling men how to vet women 🫠 I‘ve never been a rich man, and you haven’t either 🫠
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:26 PM
0

Due to two very important circumstances. You don’t understand the topic, and this problem only involves you peripherally. This would not have been a big deal if you actually said something intelligent, but you are saying a version of “just don’t be poor, bro” or “just be nice to people, and you’ll get laid”. Some men have this stick up their arse where they just need to deputize themselves as life coaches.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:07 PM
2

I did not use this as an example because there will always be some guy swearing that he‘ll be happy with a land whale.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:35 PM
1

Hi again. Sorry, I don’t evaluate things like a six year old: not every conflict can be worked through, and not every conflict is worth working through, especially when you have a baby being held hostage to a fucked family dynamics. Mother‘s job is to do what’s best for the kid, and it does not necessarily mean staying with baby daddy no matter what. You guys are so arrogant, you better not end up in a bad relationship situation, it would be lowkey funny if your woman cheated on you or backstabb…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:34 PM
1

If I waved a magic wand and made all redpillers (and you) into women, with your libido, your arrogance and your lack of accountability, 50% of you would end up as single mothers. Vetting is not simple, which is why powerful and rich men end up in messy custody or divorce cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:27 PM
2

Correction: I should have said “on no evidence”.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 08:43 PM
2

You might feel like you would but you have 0 reasons to back it up. This incredibly strong conviction is based on bad evidence. Do you understand that you don’t need to act upon your feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 08:13 PM
2

The issue is not not wanting to date single mothers, the issue is the habit of chasing after these women to volunteer your opinion on their situation. E You don’t know if the choice they’ve made was dumb - you are only saying that retroactively, knowing the outcome. You don’t know if you could have done any better had you been in her position - probably not, because you are talking shit from your position. It’s fine that you have all these feelings, but all these feelings are a little bit off.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:50 PM
2

Why follow through with your feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:40 PM
1

You are writing fanfiction. Single mothers are not scott-free, they have the harshest form of accountability for life. Most of us are just not in the business of being moral policemen.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:30 PM
3

Bitch-made men love to chase after women they say they don’t want to make some global life lessons out of every circumstance. Why resent and have an opinion on it, if you can just not accept a relationship and walk away?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:14 PM
1

Your assumption that people need to try to understand - 🥹- and god forbid not undermine, how can you be so bitch made.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 06:20 PM
6

The other girl already touched on it when she said you can always expand your selection to gay men: if your option refuses or can’t provide you with what you are looking for, they are not an option - they bring negative value to the table by wasting your time. A woman who constantly hits you up for cash is not a viable relationship option, a dude who bends you over and claps your cheeks is not a reasonable outlet for sexual frustration.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 06:19 PM
4

Some men would never share the money they don’t have with the woman they can’t attract, and this makes them alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 06:09 PM
6

Just because you get a divorce does not mean you are the cause of a situation leading up to divorce - this stat does not mean anything besides women have the courage to get out. A tiny proportion of women actually get alimony - because most men don’t have money - and average child support check is laughable, if baby daddy even pays it, which is a big if. There is no such thing as “taking man’s earnings” - there is a distribution of responsibilities in household, and if one spouse does administra…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 05:38 PM
1

who the fuck you think I am - your therapist? What even is this criticism?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 05:30 PM
1

I started off by asking some precise questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:36 PM
1

I was being civil in the beginning, you kind of led us there because you thought being polite is the same as being a pussy - I don’t know what the fuck you thought, but you chose to call people typical women instead of answering a series of questions that should be simple for a FAANG researcher. I don’t know what you thought was going to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:30 PM
1

How are you over here tone policing me while crying that I should not pay attention to your tone?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:21 PM
1

I’ve been engaging with the content of discussion and your bad evidence since the beginning while you cheerfully rolled around in your own shit
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:02 PM
1

I agree, but you kind of led your way into this by adopting this tone of voice first. How long ago did you become such a god-fearing Christian, fifteen minutes ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:57 PM
1

That’s a fine statement to make, it’s just not how you rolled into this discussion. You brought classless jabs at “304s”, incredibly strong convictions, and bad evidence to support it, which is what I called dumb and smug. I am appalled at the fact that you are getting six figures to do medical research. This discussion was not even psych 101 - this was high school textbook. I am scared. I am hoping that when it comes to body count your otherwise smart brain just shuts down.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:53 PM
1

Also, on top of everything else, you are acting like an astrology crystal chick who goes for, for example, leos, and bullshits her way into it by talking astrophysics. I am telling her, “you don’t understand astrophysics, space objectively has nothing to do with this” and her response is: “gotcha bitch! you are just against my pursuit of leos!” This is you, dipshit
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:36 PM
1

Where did I say there is no link? I said, there is no obvious causal link, which there is not. Or at least your graph does not demonstrate one. I am not dismissing the graph, I am saying that your analysis of it is wrong, because you came to incorrect conclusions. If social science data is imperfect, why sprinkle social science data to support your point in the first place? Just argue with anecdotes then, and I’ll leave you the hell alone. The comment about innate differences in temperament expl…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:32 PM
2

No, men tend to view it as a green light to override any and all boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:05 PM
1

I responded to your other message, dude, you completely fucked up. I am not sure why you keep making personal jabs
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 03:57 PM
1

Bro, no offense, but I have no idea who you are or why you think I’m interested in your assessment of me as a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 03:38 PM
1

Bro, idgaf if you live or die, I am just here to help you get some insight into data analysis. Take it easy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 03:10 PM
1

So, this graph does not show that women‘s body count affects marital happiness, it shows some type of relationship between body count and self-reported marital happiness - you don’t know if it’s causal. It is probably the case that women with higher body counts also tend to feel unhappy committed to one partner - but this is a way different statement then “body count leads to decline in marital happiness”. It is inappropriate to make this conclusion. Secondly, you saw one line below the other an…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 03:06 PM
1

I would not have started bitch slapping you around if that was all you said, but you attached some bullshit napkin science to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:49 PM
2

Now I’m confused. Then what was the point of crying that unqualified women get positions they don’t deserve?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 07:31 PM
2

Why do you have so much garbage to say here, but when confronted by specific questions you piss, shit, puke and dip immediately? You should be able to discuss your incredibly strong convictions when you tell others to gain critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:28 PM
2

For the same reasons that you listed when you and all the debate bros argued we should not have adjusted standards for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:23 PM
2

Well, none of your sources - whether academic or not - claim what you think they do. I am not sure what this comment applies to. The only typical woman here is you - you lack analytical skills to answer pretty simple questions, you go through the world selecting information that confirms your biases, and when confronted it takes you exactly two paragraphs to piss yourself and resort to dumbest dunks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:15 PM
1

Respectfully. You are saying dumb shit
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:07 PM
4

It does not happen unless you make it happen. Girls do not select every woman they interact with as a role model, and, honestly, neither do boys - what kind of daddy issues do you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 12:39 PM
1

You are not an attractive woman, but I am, so the idea, that the goal of the date is to eat, is beyond retarded. Finding someone else is NOT the point, and restaurant is NOT the goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 12:36 PM
7

The teacher’s job is not to be a role model - it’s to teach you whatever their subject is. So even the premise is retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:17 AM
12

Yeah, it’s the same as people who litter and then yell at the rest of us that the streets are full of garbage - excuse me, you are the reason why.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:05 AM
2

Then this is your response to why nobody is getting the low body count women they say they prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:58 AM
1

So, first of all, most of what you linked aren’t “studies”. Second of all, I do not need to provide studies that say the opposite, because you are the one who is making an assertion: correlation does not exist until otherwise proven, which leads me exactly to the third point - your interpretation of what these “studies” say is very questionable. Which is exactly why I asked you: what is “marital happiness” and why are you using it interchangeably with “longetivity“? What type of correlation do y…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:55 AM
2

Also, can you point me which one of these links shows the trend to be specifically strong for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 11:45 PM
2

What do you mean by “average women”? Average woman has had 0 sociopath boyfriends.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 11:39 PM
1

What the hell is “marriage happiness”? Is it self-reported? Is it measured? The studies you link below make me think that you are measuring marriage happiness in terms of longevity. What’s the correlation here - you think if you watch changes in one woman’s body count, you will observe a decrease in a potential ceiling of her “marriage happiness”? If you want a low body count woman, it’s fine, I just want to unravel the bro math on top of what’s a subjective preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 11:23 PM
1

Women who are against coffee dates as some kind of firm principle are rare, you are exposing yourself as an inexperienced person. Which is fine, but maybe let’s pump the breaks on firing shots at people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 11:05 PM
2

I meant to say, logically coherent life philosophy. Because this is not a valid way of analyzing your range of possibilities. If ten thousand people draw a lottery ticket each and one person wins ten million dollars, but the rest lose, your ceiling is not ten million dollars. Your ceiling is zero dollars. Yeah, Lauren Sanchez married a billionaire at fifty, but there is a reason why your community calls modern women delusional when they do basically what you are doing right now - operate by an a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 10:41 PM
1

No, with Bundy it doesn’t make much difference, because women who go for him target specifically people like that. They shower average-looking serial killers in love letters too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 09:56 PM
3

You can’t look at 1 person who broke all known causal relationships, and tell 99 people that they “have no excuse”. It’s not appropriate. You can say it’s a leftist life philosophy - it is, but at least it’s a statistically literate and logically coherent life philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 09:52 PM
2

Jesus Christ, what the fuck did these people do to you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:32 PM
1

No shit, it’s the gym. It‘s disingenuous to compare older guys who go to the gym with the entire population of 45 year old women most of who don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:26 PM
2

My original claim was that it shouldn’t, because I Am consistent. knew that someone like you will show up and pull akshuallys on me
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 01:12 AM
–

If men innovate and you did not innovate, you are much closer to being a woman than a man. In your worldview. Which is why I don’t understand why you roll in here dunking on chicks - you are objectively as much of an NPC chick as anyone else. This is not a personal attack, this logically flows from your principles.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 12:31 AM
7

Since there was no negativity in the breakup, I’d think that this door is not closed and I’m in a competition with the ghost of her
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 12:15 AM
7

Not a red flag, but would make me feel insecure. But not big enough deal to stop seeing the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 12:01 AM
1

You are just desperate to hear my opinion aren’t you 😂 you have to grow thicker skin than this if you aspire to any claims of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 10:11 PM
1

That changes everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 10:03 PM
2

Not for the ones who can, for the ones who can’t. Isn’t it a good thing for everybody??
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:12 PM
3

Then why are you writing I’m condemning half of population to manual labor?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:30 PM
2

I am not insulting you, I am stating this as an objective fact: you are not dating any of these women - young or old, therefore it’s pointless to debate you on this subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:18 PM
2

This half condemns itself to manual labor, it’s nobody‘s fault male retards can‘t get GEDs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:11 PM
3

It does not mean that every random coomer is qualified to debate any random subject
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:06 PM
8

OP, if I ever find myself wanting to argue about men dating younger women, I’ll go and find actual men who date younger women. I don’t know why you are inserting yourself into a conversation you are not a part of.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:54 AM
2

If we are talking about one-sided open relationships, you either need to be with someone two standard deviations below what you could have had, or it will be a two-sided open relationship without you knowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:48 AM
8

This is not about women on this sub, you are concerned with how women perceive you as a class. In spite of your aggression, you are a weak and dependent man: you can’t just choose who you want and roll with this choice unapologetically, you are constantly looking over your shoulder to see if the society has anything to say. I doubt this is only limited to women, it’s probably a whole facet of your existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:33 AM
13

I did not say rage, I said you are needing approval from others.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:22 AM
3

Also correct. Most women are neutral, because it’s not their issue. Most feminists are anti-draft in principle, but it’s just not the primary focus of their work. It’s like complaining about air pollution to CPS: the complaint is valid, but you chose the wrong audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:19 AM
13

I haven’t even begun to discuss the topic and I won’t, because I don’t have an opinion or interest in the topic. I do, however, see you as someone who is in a desperate need of validation and approval from others - you won’t catch me dead foaming at the mouth, shadowboxing imaginary or real attacks on my preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:13 AM
2

That’s seriously your definition of kindness - unconfrontational? Sounds like spinelessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:03 AM
17

It wasn’t you who wrote this mini essay trying to ragebait people? Bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:59 AM
23

OP, the only woman bitching about it way too much is you. You wrote more thought soup on the topic then any chick on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:50 AM
40

Another independent king needs us to give him permission to date younger women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:48 AM
3

Ok, then what set of observations is your opinion sourced from? Can you give a description of someone who is kind?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:45 AM
1

I have empathy for individual men, I just don’t see their issues as a product of some malevolent force
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:43 AM
6

Any woman who opens her mouth on anything draft related is told to shut up and is called ungrateful by the very men who are subject to draft. It seems like most complaints about draft are somehow used as a dunk on feminists. People are just complaining to complain, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:21 AM
0

So you think everybody should be forced to sign up for draft, nobody should be forced to sign up, or you like the way things are?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:00 AM
1

You are obsessed with women’s perception of you. You haven’t set a single trend in your life. Every random coomer be talking like he is MLK. I don’t understand how you can sit here and call us NPCs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:48 AM
1

🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:37 AM
2

So, I am very sorry, but you are a good exhibit A of the type of person I am complaining about: in the first paragraph you are raging that women are taking on roles they are unqualified to take, in the second paragraph you are insisting that the society rolls down the red carpet for students who just sit there wasting our tax dollars. Straight from the textbook of Jordan Peterson’s school of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:36 AM
2

I really don’t have an attitude about young boys. I don’t like or hate them anymore then young girls. I don’t see why this class of students deserves anymore help than anyone else, and am neutral on the issue that you want people to feel passionate about. Similarly, I feel neutral on women joining physically demanding environments and lagging behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:16 AM
2

I mean it with no disrespect, but if you are who you say you are you should be able to answer this: what’s so kind about you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:30 AM
0

not against men as a class
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:14 AM
2

Why are we talking about Trump?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:28 PM
2

I am going to use children for political revenge for as long as the other side uses them as an act of political manipulation. Where did all these bros who suddenly care about inclusivity come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:36 PM
2

Maybe that would be a better starting point: why should school be universal?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:22 PM
2

If this class of people brings nothing to the table, why are you willingly choosing to sit down at the empty table right across from incels and have an argument about what you are bringing?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:05 PM
1

If your SMV is high it’s high because you bringing something to the table. Looks is an asset like everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 09:06 PM
5

We don’t adjust it to suit boys. For the same reason why we should not adjust the military to suit female temperament, or so we were lectured by the same types of people who whine about boys’ conflicts with the school environment. If they don‘t have the willpower/personality/interest to do school as it is, Trump will build them factories. What kind of question is that? edit: thanx for the award 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:57 PM
1

You should take your meds bro, the only reason why you are haunted by single moms is either because you need psychiatric help or because you purposefully seek out interactions with them. There is a reason why these people exist in a parallel universe from me
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:31 AM
2

How do you have a girlfriend and are still bothered by single moms on Facebook, I can’t imagine to be in such a dumb situation
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:15 AM
2

No, you can‘t NOT see them, because you are obsessed and lonely
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:07 AM
2

Tired of watching the women you say you don’t want, but you keep watching them and keep inserting your very important and very informed five cents about what they should do? 🤦🏼‍♀️ so dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:53 AM
2

why do you have an opinion on single moms and what women should do? Are you a 25 year old chick?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:39 AM
2

The basic biology and facts are as follows: men want to have sex with young women, women past 25/30/35/40/45 (your choice) look objectively worse, and if you are of a high enough value there is no reason to limit yourself to a mother of your children - what is she gonna do, put them back where they came from.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:19 AM
2

There is a comment just above yours where someone denies that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:11 AM
1

So weird to hear this sentimental whining from people who constantly ooze condescension and cynicism. I think it’s dumb to advertise your generic attitude to people and simultaneously try to sell someone an idea that they will be an exception if they give you something of value. That’s why all redpillers are dogs and should be banned from the polite society.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:07 AM
4

Lol, not the pill that claims to get you laid
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 02:30 PM
1

What else can it possibly mean? All of the men are you, dude. You are free to set your conditions and the women have to either accept or be excluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 11:00 PM
1

Manipulation has not worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 10:54 PM
1

I mean, let’s say you have a line of five women at your doorstep, each one is down to date, marry, fuck - whatever. Would you rather court one for a couple of months or capitalize on your access to them immediately?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 10:34 PM
1

You can’t filter for things at the beginning. You don’t get to find out whether the bitch you are with (I believe in you) is hygienic or not until you move in with her and she leaves dirty coffee mugs and dishes and sweaty workout clothes everywhere, you don’t know if she is a nice person until you are there 24/7 to be an emotional punching bag. When you guys tell us “well you should just pick better” you sound like a virgin 🤓 pulling akshuallys, that can’t be reasoned with due to a lack of expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 10:22 PM
1

I was trying to say that the average woman who goes to a matchmaker requires them to do a lot of legwork because she is more selective than an average male client. It does not make sense to take her on as a client and put in the crazy amount of work to look for an eligible bachelor who checks all of her boxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 09:43 PM
1

If it’s true, go test this theory out and come back. Don’t just sit here and waste your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 09:35 PM
1

You kind of fucked yourself into a catch-22. If human behavior is nebulous and uncertain, then guys like yourself cannot reliably observe it from the outside, in which case all your theories are functionally useless anyways. This is the blue-pilled point, the anything can happen world. If guys like you can reliably observe human behavior, then your goal after all is to extract math and practice it like structural engineering, before you get to enter debato-sphere. This is the red-pilled point. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:06 PM
2

The matchmaker is not going to go out on a date for you, and she is not going to fuck him for you - these risks and expenses are not scalable with the amount of money you pay to someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:39 PM
1

If your friend is dealing with someone whose expectations go way above market average, especially due to mental issues, I don’t see how it’s reasonable to frame this discussion as a gender debate. In this case, I definitely can’t speak for this woman. Nobody can, she is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:29 PM
2

But you know everything about everything without doing anything 🙄 I am not saying you are at fault for your position, but I am saying your position makes you unqualified to to go berserk on people lecturing them on all the ways they are being short-sighted and fucking up. This objectively gives off the energy of a guy who failed algebra, and crucifies people on r/askscience
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:20 PM
2

Who did you pick?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:06 PM
2

You just said nothing is expected of hot men and then listed all of the things that women expect from hot men. No shit they have abundant love lives - they get through the door quickly and then frustrations build up because he feels like he doesn’t feel like he need to bring anymore than that to the table if he can just relationship hop to the next woman. You‘ve restated everything I said. Why are you arguing with me?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 06:46 PM
2

How do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 06:29 PM
9

Yeah, Elon is pissing, shitting and puking when he is treated the way he treats others. When this demographic of men complains that empathy needs to stop being the baseline expectation, they are saying that it needs to stop being expected of them. It genuinely seems to these people that women around have an obligation to do all the maintenance work that nobody actually respects. I don’t know where this delusion comes from. EDIT: thanks for the award 🥹
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 06:24 PM
6

If it was a viable option he would not be on this sub debating us on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 06:13 PM
3

I thought, as a male, your orientation is to solve this problem, but evidently your orientation is to have people tell you something that does not make you feel the need to do anything with yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 06:10 PM
1

Hotness is a sure way to get your foot in the door, but if you refuse to give people more than that, they will get resentful.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:58 PM
5

The expectations have changed, and nobody will tailor theirs to accommodate your rigidity. Adapt or be ejected from the dating pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:24 PM
2

Oh, okay, I understand now what I’m trying to tell you, but before this was intuitive. Why, from your perspective, would a woman, pay money to the matchmaker as a client, if she can just be a part of her network and passively select men who pay money to broadcast their availability to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 05:17 PM
1

By putting yourself out there, all you are doing is creating an unfiltered supply of potential candidates. Women don’t usually face the problem of lack of supply.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 04:11 PM
1

In a situation where there isn’t enough men, the remaining men stop trying because they don’t need to. The only reason why you need to entertain women is if they are free not to choose you. I already said that all this garbage that podcastosphere popularized works in an egalitarian world without any additional forces - the world that we never had until now. If you see these things as fundamentally contradictory - then the principle of free association is to take precedence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 12:59 PM
1

No, working with male and female clients are two different things, because these people have different issues. Matchmaking is just not geered to satisfy female preference. Dating apps can potentially make women happy because they give such a wide array of single men to pick from.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 12:43 PM
2

But how do matchmakers find whoever is interested? Do they just broadcast men’s pics and contact info on their channel?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 03:28 AM
12

I doubt that people whose primary goal is to make profit turn away female clients because of misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 03:26 AM
2

I am pulling your leg, nothing that you say is indicative of you being an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 12:36 AM
5

You were not a sweet guy, you were an awkward dirtbag ❤️
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 11:37 PM
1

It does not make sense to restrict your analysis to “right here, right now”, when the thing I’m complaining about happens “always, all the time” in varying degrees of intensity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 10:15 PM
1

Yes, there was and there is. Look at gender dynamics in any unstable society. Take any ghetto. Gang violence wipes out the population of eligible bachelors, well now women are fucked. Not only has the bar been drastically dropped for men, but some women are excluded. The numbers just don’t work out. Every single time there is a natural disaster - and there is always some kind of disaster in authoritarian shitholes - a depression, war, unemployment crisis, women are playing a game of musical chai…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 10:08 PM
–

You fucked yourself in a mega-nested-giga-catch-22 but that’s okay, we‘ll do some mental contortionism to unfuck our way out of it. Between a good woman and a bad woman men will pick the hotter one, and if keep arguing with this, you have to concede that all the evil women who divorced raped their husbands do not exist: marriages fall apart exclusively because of men. If marriages fall apart exclusively because of men, then these good women picked bad men due to these men being sexually attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 09:29 PM
2

First of all, I’m not here to give women a card blanche to act like men. Second of all, hate towards a certain group is not my problem. It’s a problem, of course, but not the one I care about. I don’t have an opinion about locker room talk, or “men ain’t shit”, or little boys, or little girls reading mean things online. My pet peeve is the culture where men feel comfortable to impose their system of values on women unprovoked. The fact that there is room to interpret my comment as “wow, I guess …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:58 PM
2

Nooo, exclusion can only happen to men… In the West, at this time in history, because of two broad truths: 1. Women can have available avenues other than marriage 2. There are as many men as women. Our dating environment, with its positives (freedom) and its negatives (excluded men), is a result of intentional work. The point I was making by bringing up conservative podcastophere: even in today’s marketplace the risk of being excluded is not a probable outcome for every man. You can‘t say that M…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:35 PM
0

Some women really do be out there stooping down to the level of human males in terms of classlessness of their rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:48 PM
0

No, hold up, this is absolutely happening everywhere where egalitarianism is not explicitly cultivated. This is the default line of behavior that young men pick out in social environment that does not provide any negative reinforcement. Right now in North America this fringe minority that I’m complaining about is limited to 1. People with no profile pictures, 2. Men with YouTube jobs who make money on people with no profile pictures. But the reason why it’s limited to online spaces is because we…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:17 PM
1

“Avoiding exclusion” is just a less loaded way to say “promotion of male reproductive success”, fine, I can make my language less aggressive. I agree that men use social shaming in order to not be excluded by women, but they are not doing that because they are excluded. They are doing that because they are poorly raised by their mothers and entitled. We don’t have to go as far as mullahs and other theocrats. You can call conservative commenters, politicians, media figures anything but chronicall…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:03 PM
0

The only reason why these people are a fringe minority is because Western society has done and is actively doing a lot of work to get us to a place where its unacceptable (for men) to deputize themselves as moral policemen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 06:35 PM
1

Yes. I don’t know how else to react to this piece of information.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 04:42 PM
2

I mean exactly what I say. To soften the blow I can of course add that I’m talking in generalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 04:33 PM
1

You’ve never heard anyone in your community foam at the mouth explaining what “high-value women” should be like to the rest of us?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 04:10 PM
2

So they are maintaining the social order that benefits their reproductive strategy. Does not this prove my point? Impulse to impose a set of rules on people is not a function of whether they can easily find desirable partners or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 02:02 PM
1

Bro. Getting falsely accused of rape is an improvement for many men out there, most are just invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 12:13 PM
2

Excuse me?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 12:01 AM
0

Holy shit, a girl with a religious upbringing asked you a polite question and you just could not not be a swine
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:00 PM
2

What does it have to do with my point? Stop polluting the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 10:56 PM
7

This is anecdotal but it seems to me that the trend amplifies in conservative societies: the more selective men can afford to become, the more they‘ll walk around policing women for not living up to their expectations. In the Middle East women don’t sleep around and any coomer can find himself a virgin, yet they still feel the necessity to bully the fuck out of a small minority of girls who don’t live up to their expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 09:29 PM
3

Relate it back to my point?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 08:38 PM
4

So, when you compare standards, you run into the issue that you aren’t comparing apples to apples. When men say they a wide range of preferences, what it means is they have a wide range of preferences for women in their twenties. Not that any of this is relevant to my point, like, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 08:34 PM
0

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 07:30 PM
4

Beta orbiters and male friends are a literal meme. How many times did we hear stories of guys being stuck in friendzone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:38 PM
14

these ideas don’t come from western or non-western men, they come from men who can’t compete.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:05 PM
1

The same is already expected of women: very few women will make or entertain an argument that you should be on your knees in gratitude for being treated with human decency and having political freedoms. This is just assumed to be a necessary prerequisite. A woman will never make a post on this sub explaining to you all the reasons why you should not vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:51 PM
6

I genuinely don’t understand your point, but I can sense passive aggression
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:47 PM
9

this sub is just full of kings who you’d want to keep tabs on from afar and definitely get updates, but not be a part of their orbit
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:33 PM
3

And today some women do exactly that, and men aren’t appreciative of that. When you guys complain about “modern women” you are complaining about women who stoop down to your level (generic you).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:26 PM
1

We are doing it. I don’t remember saying or implying that you should be grateful when women treat you with baseline human decency.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:19 PM
5

So modern women pick you and compete for you, but they pick wrong, and this is the evidence of the worlds downfall?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:35 PM
4

Women see all men as people irrespective of whether we like you guys or not, we just don’t see the men we aren‘t into as relevant to this specific goal of finding a bf. Now, yes, this will be bad in effect for some people. But first and foremost, female actions do not violate the principles of free association. None of the solutions that you offer to bad effects can violate these principles either. This should be a solid starting point for any conversation about male issues, but it rarely is, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:34 PM
5

As opposed to picking you and competing for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:53 PM
5

Our society is fucked up because women don‘t line up to audition for a role of your woman - that’s the criticism you are going for?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:34 PM
8

I’m confused. You are the one with a problem, but everyone else should compete to solve it for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:01 PM
2

Listen, when I call you average I don’t mean it as you don’t have a right to your opinions or concerns, or that you should STFU. You are voting to maximize your self-benefit, as you see it. Your probleI just don’t know who you are or why you think I should care about your problems, or engage with your political points. It’s very weird to read mini-essays by someone who foams at the mouth ”DO you want to know whats wrong with the Democrats?! 🤬” - no, i‘m not here to provide therapy for people who…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:55 PM
10

If you were handsome and if you made a lot of money, then you would be a part of the football team. Or at least, you’d be able to attract this kind of woman without the rest of the society forcing her to commit to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:42 PM
25

The difference between men and women is that women will never creep up on individual men and lecture them on what they must become. I see women simply stating what they want in an ideal guy, and these standards might or might not be ridiculous, but if a guy is not checking their boxes they just won’t notice his existence. When men make posts asking us what men should do, we aren’t lying by saying “do whatever you want”. I don’t have an opinion, and most of us are not in the business of forcing p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:38 PM
2

You could, but instead you chose to stoop down to comments like STFU
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:28 PM
11

There are objectively zero reasons why you should have this treatment. You talk smack about people online, you probably aren’t that handsome, chances are you aren’t that rich. Honestly I’m very sexually selective and even reading your comments, I don’t know why you think you should reproduce with a 10/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:25 PM
2

I am not insulting you, I’m stating this as a fact - you are an average representative of the species, with average guy concerns, with average political analysis skills, with talking points sourced from podcasts for retards. Maybe you are above average in some other metric. I don’t know. I really don‘t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:57 PM
2

No offense, but what do you have to do with any of the men who extended rights to groups of people? In the patriarchal world, you’d be someone’s bottom bitch. This is not a personal insult, this is an uncomfortable statistic - most men who tell women to be grateful for equality should be just as grateful. Not only are you a nobody, but the idea itself that people owe anybody gratitude for being treated like individuals is what‘s wrong with retards in your strange corner of the internet. You don‘…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:45 PM
2

Yeah… You don’t get any credit for this. Things would have never happened if women didn’t complain.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:22 PM
0

They would and they did, which is why I cant take women seriously. If you are asking me to give them potential reasons not to vote Republican, I can’t. I think they are a lost cause. Vance‘s classlessness should have been enough of a reason. This has nothing to do with your personal opinion of childless catladies - Vance should not be comfortable to voice his personal opinions about people who pay his salary.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:17 PM
1

Who told you to shut up?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:14 AM
2

Yes, so you can’t socially engineer your way out by calling the dynamic “sexist”. You have to rewire men’s anatomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:12 AM
5

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:02 AM
1

Are you conceding your point, or?…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:54 AM
5

You are very triggered for someone who is trying to fire shots at women for being too sensitive to words.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:41 AM
3

Showing initiative has nothing to do with overt sexual display, adults around you were supposed to teach you how to demonstrate interest in ways that aren‘t overtly sexual when you turned thirteen. If your dad never taught you this, it’s not your fault, but “lacking maturity, discipline and respect” is a pretty good summary of how you are perceived with your unsophisticated advances. This is not intellectually dishonest, it’s quite accurate. Most women are well aware of the line between sexy and…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:30 AM
3

My issue is not that men refuse to vote democrat because of the disrespect. My issue is that women don’t refuse to vote Republican enough. I don’t know why you think I want to hear your perspective on the democrats more than any other person‘s perspective. You are run of the mill triggered dude with a bunch of typical dude pet peeves.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:58 AM
3

The dynamic of men approaching women is created by the fact that women on average are just less interested than men. You are free to break away your traditional masculinity and not approach, in fact, none of the men I’ve interacted with today approached me. And nothing bad happened to them. You are not imprisoned in your gender role by the society - you are imprisoned in it by your own libido. Do you understand the use of force and market forces?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:34 AM
4

I mean, they can, but it‘s pretty strange to phone your bf every time someone is being mean to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:26 AM
1

so, your point is that the method is ineffective? The whole “sexism” line of argumentation has very little to do with this
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:56 AM
0

A typical woman is not exactly all over the typical man in the first place, it’s unclear who they are pushing away and from who, when - let’s be clear - there is not anybody interested in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:41 AM
6

Unfortunately for sophisticated men, there are far too many guys who only understand the language of force and retaliation. When women take the high road, they take it as a green light to act however they choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:39 AM
1

Look at who helps this type of guy reinforce the differing standard for what’s acceptable. I can’t take women seriously complaining about men not filtering their crap when Vance calls us childless catladies, and what do 40% of us do? Swallow his piss and vote for him. While the rest of us are being lectured that men don’t vote democrat because they are tired of taking disrespect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:26 AM
6

Look at who helps this type of guy reinforce the differing standard for what’s acceptable. I can’t take women seriously complaining about men not filtering their crap when Vance calls us childless catladies, and what do 40% of us do? Swallow his piss and vote for him. While the rest of us are being lectured that men don’t vote democrat because they are tired of taking disrespect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:25 AM
-1

You are told “if you want A do B”. You think you are told that because you are man, but in reality you are being told that because you are the one with a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:41 AM
0

I don’t think they are imposing an arbitrary expectation on you, they marketing this as a good means to an end.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:21 AM
12

”Second, it's sexist. It's based on the lopsided notion that men have to do all the work in initiating courtship. Why should men be stuck with this role when women no longer have any gender roles to adhere to? We can either have equality or not. “ We do have equality: neither one of us has to approach the other already. I’m confused. Who puts a gun to your head and forces you to talk to strangers?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:56 AM
–

It’s just very strange that you decided to extend this privilege to landowners… And that‘s it, because others are apparently not being held accountable for their choices. Thousands of people who don’t own land and who are planning on retiring woke up two days ago to one of the most brutal forms of accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:14 AM
2

”Grammar of a six grader” 🤓. Bro be charactermaxxing on a construction site. The question is what the society can do for me. Welcome to reality of being female, it will black pill the hell out of you. I would not talk to anybody like that if this conversation wasn‘t happening under the post aimed at cucking half of population out of rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:03 AM
3

”Grammar of a six grader” 🤓. Bro be charactermaxxing on a construction site. The question is what the society can do for me. Welcome to reality of being female, it will black pill the hell out of you. I would not talk to anybody like that if this conversation wasn‘t happening under the post aimed at cucking half of population out of rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:02 AM
–

lol, but why not. Men are notorious for sucking up to populist scammers, every single time your gender gets the microphone your first impulse is to cuck others out of some random right, which has been well demonstrated right here, in this very post, by OP. Maybe we should put y’all back in coal mines.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:34 PM
–

What the fuck does owning land have to do with any of this? Everybody suffers consequences of bad policy depending on a specific policy, except for maybe rich people because they have more of a margin for fuck ups. What a clueless moronic thing to think, that landowners are somehow uniquely predisposed to being fucked over in ways that other groups aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:22 PM
–

No, you misunderstood: I am smart enough and hot enough not to do physical labor. I bring enough to the society for me to not have to ruin my body with scars and burns. When I say “you should go work at the oil rigs”, I mean you personally should. I shouldn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:19 PM
–

And men vote for social justice agenda. Everybody, this retard just discovered exactly why it’s ridiculous to restrict people’s access to voting based on the social groups they belong to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:08 PM
–

What point do you think you are making - that neither gender should vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:04 PM
–

He should be open to hearing that as a man, and so should you, and by the way, why are you arguing with chicks on forums? Go get a job at the oil rigs and do something for the society. Your current form of employment gives you too much free time which you use to run your mouth on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:01 PM
–

this kind of guy thinks you having some negative emotions to absolute wild fucking shit he saying is a sign of weakness. But he, himself, will of course be pissing, shitting and puking if someone spoke this way about his right to vote (which is just as questionable because he will be taking Trump’s dick up his ass no matter what).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:37 PM
–

I don’t know about the previous commenter, but I am offended by the fact that you think you have a right to talk. You represent the gender that voted Hitler into power, so might as well pump the breaks on firing shots at people.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:27 PM
1

What? How does anything you just said logically flow from what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:20 PM
1

Umm, yes. If you have no money, then you are broke. If you don’t practice your craft, you are a bad craftsman. If you aren't making a consistent conscious effort to be a good person, you are a bad person. So when you tell me that the world somehow does not notice the inherent goodness of losers, I and the rest of the world see this as a copout for useless men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:19 PM
1

That’s convenient, but this one ugly guy who you told me not to use as an example isn’t perceived as a bad person. Weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 05:39 PM
1

Remember: average red piller can’t express a single coherent thought without tripping over his entire belief system. It makes total sense that you would think women only go for financial security, looks or a combination of looks and financial security, because in your world a single woman in active search is always an instagrammable twenty-two year-old chick from an upper middle class community. And all of the single moms, obese women, older women that you guys constantly spit fire on - you aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 05:08 PM
1

I‘m gonna use the very uncomfortable truth that most ugly guys don’t have any personality in the first place, and aren’t qualified to make any statements on its importance or a lack of it. “Personality” has become something that every loser thinks he possesses because he isn’t fucked up enough to kick puppies, I don’t know. Speaking of the survivorship bias argument that you think you successfully shut down by adding “might as well not respond” at the end. Everybody knows a couple like that… Pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:58 PM
2

Not only will women compromise for money, they will compromise for a general sense of security, expressed by character, dutifulness, skills and talents, and a bunch of other things that most cynical men from weird corners of the internet don’t provide (but think they do). Your community is in fact well aware of this and calls it “settling”. You will be over there moving mountains to have meaningless sex with this stranger before you even get a chance to guide her through your cognitive checkpoin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:41 PM
1

But what does any of this have to do with you personally? I believe you when you say sexual chemistry is a necessary prerequisite… For you. And by the way, I’ll even go as far as saying one very cynical but very important thing. I think you take the option to have someone who checks all your boxes for granted. If I was to put you in some other environment, your priorities and expectations will start sorting themselves out very rapidly, and probably not in favor of physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:30 PM
1

I don’t have an opinion about whether you should or shouldn’t date around. But. Can we stop calling unsophistication logical? This disgusting fucking word triggers me. If a woman to a man’s “wanna fuck” responded with “did you see yourself in the mirror?” instead of “i‘m not into casual”, he would have pissed himself. Even though it would have been a completely logical response. I personally checked, and men don’t like being spoken to the way they want to speak to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:38 PM
2

It lowkey annoys me when men whine about women being shallow. Women are not lying when they say they’ll compromise on physical attraction, but because you don’t understand women, you are projecting your own values and priorities onto them. You, on the other hand, will be on your knees if a girl with a nice ass walks into your room.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter