TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

space-c0yote Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by space-c0yote on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

I don't think it's necessarily hypocrisy due to the inherent differences between the sexes. Child support exists for the wellbeing of the child. Once a child is born, that child needs to be supported, and part of that burden should lie with the father. It's a different question entirely for the unborn. What rights do the unborn have? When do we consider a life worth protecting? These are the questions that surround the issue of abortion. Depending on how you answer these questions, you will come…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 05:36 PM
116

I don't think there was anything ostensibly wrong with the article, but these types of articles always leave something to be desired. As I read more and more of these articles that tend to be long diatribes on masculinity, I keep getting a pervasive feeling that the authors don't actually care. Throughout all of these types of articles there is this consistent yet subtle dehumanising tone that feels like it's treating men, not as people, but like test subjects in a lab to be poked and prodded at…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 06:26 AM
9

You're receiving a lot of positive affirmation so far on this post, but I don't think the wage gap is a particularly compelling reason to either follow or disavow feminism. The wage gap can still easily fit into a feminist lens, despite being nearly entirely accounted for when factor in industry, hours worked, requests for pay rises, etc. There are plenty of ways in which systemic sexism against women can play into it, including: Male-dominated fields being valued higher Women being less likely …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/23 05:05 PM
1

You have the numerator and denominator the wrong way around there, it should be 0.17/0.2 not 0.2/0.17. That would still lead to an implausible 85% of meat consumption, but it isn't impossible. In order for that stat to be impossible, they would need to claim that men cause more than 50% more emissions than women due to eating meat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 07:46 PM
1

I guess the overall equation isn't making sense to me then. If men were to cause 41% more emissions, then that would mean the overall split of emissions would be approximately 58% for men and 42% for women. I don't understand how we get from this distribution of emissions to men consuming more meat than all meat produced. Even if we assume that all other emissions are equally distributed, that would still mean that men only consume 90% of the meat produced. That is also assuming that all emissio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 01:42 PM
2

My brain isn’t working, can you explain why the -(1-1.41)/(1.41+1) is part of the equation?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 05:40 AM
1

I don't think it matters on your motivations, so long as you're engaging in beneficial behaviour. If you're working out so you can sleep around more easily, who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 05:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter