spaghetti335 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Female YouTuber with millions of dollars complaining about not getting paid enough even though her videos are either not interesting or ad hominem attacks towards men, White people, or Americans. Source please! Some light Googling found nothing	/r/MensRights	10/12/18 05:48 PM
1	One of the First Women in the Infantry Will Be Discharged From the Marines for Fraternization I think I like that better. Promise makes it seem a bit more explicit, but trust is more all-encompassing. I may not promise my boyfriend/girlfriend I'll be monogamous, but I could still violate their trust.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/09/18 02:03 PM
36	One of the First Women in the Infantry Will Be Discharged From the Marines for Fraternization I mean, I lose respect for people who break their promises, and adultery is contingent on the breaking of a promise. Of course, breaking promises isn't universally "wrong", but there is no objective "wrong", is there? It's all relative to a certain system.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/09/18 01:16 PM
3	Woman hangs a toddler and runs over 2 people with a van, judge blames abuse by husband, gives her probation Which means that if she's mentally ill enough to kill people, for the sake of the public and herself, she must be sent to at least a psychatric ward. Looks like a 10-year probation with mandatory psychological treatment.	/r/MensRights	19/08/18 03:15 PM
1	men feel less judged by other men? lets judge em for that I've typically noticed that men seemed to be less understanding of their male friends who listened to girly music than women. I'm fairly comfortable with my taste in music, but I've bonded with a fair number of jock-ish guys over less-than-masculine music in the past. And even when they do crack jokes, it's usually a gateway to talk about their odd favorites. I'm thinking men hiding this stuff from women may have more to do with insecurities about sex, and not necessarily because their girlfrien…	/r/MensRights	10/06/18 05:21 PM
2	Are all finances shared? If the shoe were on the opposite foot, would you feel the same? The gender is certainly irrelevant, sure. That's why we were discussing hypothetical wives earlier and my position didn't change. I grant that just 'boyfriend' status doesn't necessarily mean they're not trying to make a life together. It's not necessarily true, but I think it's a fair assumption to make given no further information. And I'm not saying that the money isn't life-changing, I'm saying that it's not her right to know, and he's not deceitful for withholding it. Your partner deserves …	/r/MensRights	18/05/18 01:37 PM
9	Are all finances shared? If the shoe were on the opposite foot, would you feel the same? AIDS isn't exactly a fair comparison though, is it? If your sexual partner has AIDS, it is necessarily your business, and not disclosing it has serious harmful repercussions. An investment account with a large sum of money? Not even the same ballpark. I can respect that it's a big deal for you, but I wouldn't consider this to be my business. Maybe if we're trying to create a life/home together, but in the scenario above he's just the boyfriend, so I'm at least dubious.	/r/MensRights	18/05/18 04:34 AM
5	Are all finances shared? If the shoe were on the opposite foot, would you feel the same? What do you define as 'hiding'? If your wife had mentioned she had an investment account but never went into the details, would you still consider it deceitful?	/r/MensRights	18/05/18 04:15 AM
2	Men should work less to close gender paygap Solutions this article proposes (and my responses): 1) Rule out negotiation Employers are incentivized to pay their employees as little as they can get away with. This would be a bad change for employees as a whole. 2) Employers should automatically consider promotion They already do. 3) Consider more women for internal promotions They should promote the best person for the job, regardless of gender. Even if they demonstrated a bias against women, instituting a second bias in their favour would …	/r/MensRights	13/05/18 07:10 PM
38	men feel less judged by other men? lets judge em for that I found another source for this story (archive). The core of it's the same, but that highlighted text is slightly different: The men also reported feeling less judged by their close male friends than by their girlfriends. One participant commented: "Tim knows I love listening to Taylor Swift and Beyonce, but I keep that quiet [around my girlfriend] because she would judge me. I feel like I have to be more manly around her." Sounds like fragile masculinity to us. I think that puts the final remar…	/r/MensRights	12/05/18 05:37 PM
4	The naked truth about vibrators The belief that women are somehow a "naturally weaker gender" is a deeply ingrained, socially constructed myth, which of course is completely false, but the notion is reinforced and perpetuated when women are continuously portrayed as frail, fragile, and vulnerable creatures... the Damsel in Distress trope as a recurring trend does help to normalize extremely toxic, patronizing and paternalistic attitudes about women. - Anita Sarkeesian, Damsel in Distress: Part 1 It's fair to say Sarkeesian vie…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/05/18 08:28 PM
8	The naked truth about vibrators It addition to the other comments you've received, it's important to note that Sarkeesian is basically just the modern day Jack Thompson, but where he argued video games make us violent, she argues they make us sexist. And her arguments carry the same flaws as his did. I won't be so naive as to say her feminism is irrelevant, but to suggest it's the primary or even a major component of the reaction against her is frankly ignorant.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/05/18 05:59 PM
2	If zombies aren't fucking real, why would such a word exist at all? Can't speak for trolls, but I'm not.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/05/18 01:59 PM
8	If zombies aren't fucking real, why would such a word exist at all? Can you imagine a presidential candidate saying "I'm the best person for the job. Why? I'm not going to do your research for you." You have no obligation to prove anything, but few will accept your claims without substance to back it up.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/05/18 01:43 PM
161	Looks like a great campaign to help tackle male suicide This is a great campaign. Subtle, yet clear, seriously, yet positive. This seems to be linked to the Time to Change campaign in England. You can check them out here.	/r/MensRights	24/04/18 11:30 AM
2	TIL: When feminist Susan Brownmiller was asked for evidence supporting her claim that feminist censorship would stop rape, she replied "The statistics will come. We supply the ideology; it's for other people to come up with the statistics." the reason women have much larger breasts than our closest relatives (chimpanzees, gorillas) is because humans are more sexual in nature, more sexual all year round, have more erogenous zones etc. I'm not too sure about this. Bonobos are fairly closely related and much more sexually 'liberal', yet do not have persistently enlarged breasts. You also need to consider that there is no correlation between 'normal' breast size and milk production. That, and give our 'litter size', humans don't exactl…	/r/MensRights	22/04/18 04:34 PM
1	TIL: When feminist Susan Brownmiller was asked for evidence supporting her claim that feminist censorship would stop rape, she replied "The statistics will come. We supply the ideology; it's for other people to come up with the statistics." Is anyone able to find a primary source on that quote? The link's citation goes here, which says it's from a Boston Phoenix interview, but there's no further citation, and with that publication closed it's kinda hard to dig deeper.	/r/MensRights	22/04/18 04:16 PM
2	I guess this where we’re at now. “Men are scary. End of story” I wish you would have lead with that, because it's a very different statement from your original statement. And with this I agree wholeheartedly, so it seems there's nothing more to say. Have a wonderful day!	/r/MensRights	11/04/18 01:07 AM
4	I guess this where we’re at now. “Men are scary. End of story” I'm going to link to the other comment I wrote on this. But I'll still address you in particular. No one thinks it's inherently wrong to have fears, and ones fears might be quite valid (as yours are). But there is a distinction to be made between "I'm scared of men" and "Men are scary," right? That's really the core point here.	/r/MensRights	11/04/18 12:34 AM
6	I guess this where we’re at now. “Men are scary. End of story” I'd say it's the framing that's the issue. It's not wrong for someone to have fears, but they aren't attributing it to themselves. They're attributing it to the other. It's no more reasonable to say "men are scary" as it is to say "Jews are scary". It's more reasonable to say "I'm scared of men" and then we can talk about why. Perhaps it's even justified (abuse) but that doesn't make men inherently worthy of fear. Additionally, there's the comment by "nutriecutie". "I have no reason to think [he…	/r/MensRights	11/04/18 12:31 AM
0	Female Domestic Abuse vs Male Domestic Abuse. Was posted in /r/videos, except every single comment was deleted with no explanation as to why. Rule 1 - No Politics Additional Information: (2) The video focuses heavily on a political topic. Common examples include (but are not limited to): (b) Gender Politics: Feminism, Men's-Rights, Gender Identities. (Source) I'm not defending the rule or arguing that it's applied evenly, but as stated the rule does seem to prohibit such posts. I don't see any rules stated about comments though, so I'm not sure about that. Does ceddit consider all comments on a removed post to be "removed", or just on…	/r/MensRights	07/04/18 04:31 PM
35	Sexual harasser Katy Perry is paid double what her male co-stars on American Idol each get. When do the feminist protests for equal pay start? But that's the point. This isn't a post to say "This is unfair, let's fight it." It's to say "Either every instance of unequal pay is sexist, or maybe there's some nuance here."	/r/MensRights	04/04/18 02:17 PM
1	Male teacher gets 5 years in prison for hugging 1 student- women who have sex multiple times with mutiple students rarely see the inside of a prison let alone 5 years. You agree that it was more than hugging. I agree that there is a large gendered sentencing disparity. No one is saying OP is wrong or that this post is bad. So, are we good?	/r/MensRights	01/04/18 02:52 AM
1	Male teacher gets 5 years in prison for hugging 1 student- women who have sex multiple times with mutiple students rarely see the inside of a prison let alone 5 years. The headline of the article itself is good. "Iowa Supreme Court: 'Hugs can constitute sexual conduct' for teachers" The title of this post is not. He was not imprisoned simply for hugging a child. There was a greater context that suggests grooming. Granted he was given a worse sentence for grooming than a woman likely would have, but at least that's an apples-to-apples comparison.	/r/MensRights	31/03/18 07:25 PM
2	Male teacher gets 5 years in prison for hugging 1 student- women who have sex multiple times with mutiple students rarely see the inside of a prison let alone 5 years. And hugs are a bad thing as a male. This particular story aside, this is a sad reality, but it's definitely reality. I've heard male teachers say they never close their door when with a student, and if they're with a female they always call in a third party. There's concern, and then there's this, and this is just terrible.	/r/MensRights	31/03/18 04:00 PM
2	Male teacher gets 5 years in prison for hugging 1 student- women who have sex multiple times with mutiple students rarely see the inside of a prison let alone 5 years. At the very least we should try to stay above that sort of thing. The MRM's got a bad enough rep already; no reason to add fuel to the fire. But I don't disagree with anything you've said. Just wanted to be absolutely clear :) Edit: It would be better to say "The MRM is viewed unfavourably". There is no earned bad reputation, it's just what it is.	/r/MensRights	31/03/18 03:57 PM
2	Male teacher gets 5 years in prison for hugging 1 student- women who have sex multiple times with mutiple students rarely see the inside of a prison let alone 5 years. I wrote another comment but I deleted it because we're on the same page here. There is a sentencing discrepancy, and this is a good example of it. We just can't diminish the significance of the grooming here. But like I said, we're on the same page. Have a wonderful day!	/r/MensRights	31/03/18 03:54 PM
279	Male teacher gets 5 years in prison for hugging 1 student- women who have sex multiple times with mutiple students rarely see the inside of a prison let alone 5 years. "Wickes’s prison sentence is not simply punishing him for giving hugs to a student. Instead, his punishment reflects the fact that Wickes abused his position of trust as a teacher to sexually exploit a student for his own gratification," Zager wrote. I'm not saying there's no sentencing bias, but this case is clearly more complicated than a hug, and framing it as such is a misrepresentation.	/r/MensRights	31/03/18 01:14 PM
1	Texas bill would fine men $100 every time they masterbait Certainly, but are they persons? Both cancer and infants are human, but only one counts as a person. That's what the discussion on abortion should be about, not their species. (I'm not trying to say fetuses are a mass of cells or à baby. This is meant to be neutral)	/r/MensRights	27/03/18 11:40 AM
10	It is in fact males, not females, that suffer "institutional oppression" in the modern day west. How many women's issues have been corrected in the last 50 years? How many men's issues? As Bill Burr put it, at least people care when women have problems. When something happens to men, it's just funny. This isn't a post to say women have it easy, it's to illustrate that in trying to help one group, we've completely neglected another.	/r/MensRights	26/03/18 02:02 PM
1	Misrepresentation of the "gender pay gap" Cité the 8% please? I've heard ~2% when accounting for age, marriage and children.	/r/MensRights	25/03/18 04:58 PM
1	UK Judge calls for overhaul of marriage law that men must pay their ex-wives for life According to Wikipedia (I'm lazy), in Ontario common-law marriage covers spousal support (alimony) but does not entitle a portion of property. That said, one can request the court to divide property equitably. Additionally, common-law marriage does not prevent one from being compelled to testify against their 'spouse.'	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/03/18 05:27 PM
1	I’m willing to believe this girl is short & fat I've actually been considering drinking something with a few more electrolytes, and the other day at the gym I saw someone with a lemon wedge in his water. That seems like a pretty solid idea. Watered down drinks tend to gross me out, so it doesn't work for me, and even if they did I know that I respond better to total prohibitions. Everyone is different I guess. As for pop, nowadays it's it's exclusively when I'm mixing drinks or at the movies, both of which are rare. Social reclusion has its b…	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/03/18 04:47 PM
1	I’m willing to believe this girl is short & fat Unsolicited advice: A few people mentioned sugar. For me, it became really apparent that a few months of almost 0 sugar 'reset' my brain, to the point where I'm activity repulsed by things that are too sweet. Best thing you can do is not to cut out bad habits, but to replace them. I started to drink a tonne of water so I'd never think "I'm thirsty, let's grab some juice." For your back, consider creating associations with stretching. Reach for the floor before every drink, for example. We're cre…	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/03/18 05:58 PM
1	How to get banned from r/feminism Thanks! I'll report back if there's anything of note	/r/MensRights	09/03/18 03:37 PM
1	How to get banned from r/feminism I'm going to try using "multivaried analysis" and we'll see how well that flies. I'm not kidding either, nor am I going to try to get banned. But if I see someone over there argue that it's real, asking them to consider the multivaried analyses is legitimately the most important step to a productive conversation. And if that gets me banned, so be it, but I really do hope it doesn't.	/r/MensRights	08/03/18 03:24 PM
3	How to get banned from r/feminism I got banned from feminism and feminisms as soon as I started actively engaging. And I did my best to be careful, knowing that they had a reputation for banning on sight (though the latter less so).	/r/MensRights	08/03/18 03:22 PM
1	How to get banned from r/feminism The uncharitable view of the argument that got me banned was that I was defending rapists by saying "no doesn't always mean no". The generous view is that I'm simply pointing out how language is messy, and that the literal words we use aren't always what we mean. "No" doesn't always mean no, but "yes" doesn't always mean yes either. (As I explicitly stated) I started writing this trying to be neutral, but it really does feel that they had to take the worst view of my position to justify their ba…	/r/MensRights	08/03/18 03:20 PM
2	International Sexist day. But to be fair, JohnKimble was using the CEO being ousted as an example of Mozilla's politics affecting their business practices, and Ripdog disproved that. I agree that he was effectively forced out, but that's fundamentally different. Not saying you didn't understand that, but it's important to verbalize it.	/r/MensRights	08/03/18 03:02 PM
1	We at MensRights would like to celebrate international womens day because in contrary to popular belief we're not anti women! To be fair, no one explicitly said it was sexist towards men. <sup>I know, I know, I'm being dumb</sup>	/r/MensRights	08/03/18 02:49 PM
1	The Green party officially announces a huge change, tells people "DON'T give any money to charity or men anymore-give it ONLY to WOMEN instead". Can we now admit the modern Left are the worst man haters & feminists? And I write this as a shocked & stunned Left winger. Source for me too please	/r/MensRights	05/03/18 02:30 PM
1	My dorm just put up this new board, "Mansplaining Explained" Patronize Patron- from the Latin pater or meaning father. -ize, interestingly, can be traced all the way back to the Proto-Indo-European -idyé-. Clearly you already knew this, but that was pretty interesting to look into. Specifically, the "ize" suffix. I wonder how that trickled down into all of the other PIE languages.	/r/MensRights	01/03/18 08:30 PM
4	What I found today on Twitter I agree with what the author is trying to accomplish, but I disagree with their approach. The attributes and actions of a subset of a group do not reflect on the group as a whole unless you can demonstrate this, and the author has failed to do so.	/r/MensRights	22/02/18 09:30 PM
9	Because of #MeToo the number of male managers uncomfortable mentoring women has more than tripled. Almost half are uncomfortable participating in a common work activity with a woman. I'm not making a judgement here (I've never seen the triple parentheses before) but just reading the Wikipedia summary, as soon as I read "alt-right" I immediately became suspicious that this is actually anti-semitic at all. I'm not saying it's not, but lately the way people use "racist" and "alt-right" make me want to instinctively dismiss any statements made about either.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/02/18 08:52 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter You're approaching this from a very logical perspective. I've often been described as robotic, so that's very possible. Pro-choice women don't necessarily find it an easier choice Relatively they do. The pro-life advocates are saying that abortion is literally killing a child. Pro-choice advocates are saying that a fetus is a potential child. The difference between these two stances is monumental. That's not to say it's easy by any means, but who wouldn't rather kill a potential child than an ex…	/r/MensRights	15/02/18 08:30 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter I would like to note that married women do have abortions. Without a doubt. I just didn't see another solution to the issue given the precedence set with other assets. You're assuming pro-choice would easily want an abortion. Not easy, easier. That makes a huge difference. Obviously it's emotionally taxing to get rid of a fetus (especially one you want,) but there's a difference between someone who finds it morally reprehensible and someone who considers it permissible. Pro-life women also frequ…	/r/MensRights	15/02/18 02:15 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter First, a potential source of confusion I should have clarified earlier: For married couples, 'financial abortion' this is not an option. Children would be treated like cars or houses in that the marriage contract enforces rights/responsibility. 'Financial abortion' would come into place for unmarried couples. So we've narrowed the scope a bit to something that's hopefully more reasonable to the both of us (even if we're not totally on the same page). Next, we can reduce your list down to the ite…	/r/MensRights	15/02/18 02:52 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter They're not equal opportunity, one is discharging your responsibilities to a child, the other is terminating a pregnancy ensuring that no child exists. As I have clarified, I'm talking about the opportunity of opting out. It seems clear to me that you're talking about the consequence of that decision. A potential child be terminated is a consequence of the mother opting out, and discharging the father's responsibility of him opting out. Ideally, there would be alternative consequences to these c…	/r/MensRights	14/02/18 12:39 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter They also aren't rights. I misread your previous comment. That's on me. It could easily be argued that gender dimorphism should play a role. Men are predisposed to aggressive tendencies, so aren't they unfairly targeted? And sentencing severity is heavily based on the gender of the offender (this is frequently intentional on the part of the judges). It wouldn't be unexpected for our laws to be gendered, but they're not, and that's a good thing. The right to opt out of parenthood is just a blip t…	/r/MensRights	14/02/18 01:16 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter None, because outside of gestation sexual dimorphism is largely irrelevant. Not entirely true. A large portion of the gender wage disparity is attributed to differences in gendered behaviour. Men are more aggressive which means they negotiate higher. Separately, women are more agreeable; a trait which is generally paid less. These aren't considered irrelevant points. And a financial abortion isn't equal to having a medical procedure in terms of opportunity either. From the perspective of "Opport…	/r/MensRights	13/02/18 10:34 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter There is no legal equality. This is literally the basis for our legal foundation. Outside of parenthood, name 1 right that is gendered? Just like kicking someone in the nuts isn't equal to having a period. Why stop at groin-kicks? Let's just go full Harrison Bergeron. The law is not responsible for equality of outcome. At least it shouldn't be. It's responsible for equality of opportunity. But it's only one situation that results in their being a child. With a financial abortion there is still a…	/r/MensRights	13/02/18 01:08 PM
6	Woman sneaks up and tries to pepper spray a grown man for no reason, grown man responds accordingly /r/latestagecapitalism "Don't defend Capitalism. You will be banned. Say what you will about them, at least they're open about being an echo chamber. If only everyone would be so transparent.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/02/18 02:33 AM
5	Woman sneaks up and tries to pepper spray a grown man for no reason, grown man responds accordingly Khorne cares not from whence the blood flows, only that it flows Fuck me. Alright, I guess I'm getting into Warhammer now.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/02/18 02:30 AM
2	Woman sneaks up and tries to pepper spray a grown man for no reason, grown man responds accordingly "Channel your indignation where it belongs" was fucking perfect. It was remarkable how defeated she looked in that moment. Also, how the fuck do you pepper spray someone and not 2 minutes later ask "Are you guys done harassing us?"	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/02/18 02:26 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter So your view on the nut kicking, for or against? It's irrelevant to the conversation. I'm not advocating for biological equality, I'm advocating for legal equality. But obviously I'm not in favour of unnecessary harm. The decision of the man is also taking place while there is no child. Yes, that's exactly my point. Both are making a choice while there is no parent to harm. You missed the word typically. If one parent is dead, if one parent is unknown, then government benefits typically step in.…	/r/MensRights	13/02/18 02:17 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter So fairness is the only thing that matters. From a legal perspective, yes. That is a foundational concept of our legal systems in the West. Biological inequality is not an argument against legal equality. The ability of a woman to end a pregnancy is about bodily autonomy, it has nothing to do with supporting a child, because at that time there is no child. The decision of the man is also taking place while there is no child. Once a child is born it is entitled to the support of typically two par…	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 02:33 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter The man can also prevent themselves from becoming a parent by not having penis in vagina sex. If that's the case, ban abortions too. If she didn't want a child, she shouldn't have had sex. Either both sexes get a say post-conception, or neither do. It's not fair that women have an additional option to stop a pregnancy, but it's also not fair that men are typically stronger than women. We are a sexually dimorphic species, but everyone is (or rather, should be) equal in the eyes of the law. Why sh…	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 04:39 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter By aborting the child, she is preventing herself from becoming a parent. That is what I mean by "opting out of parenthood". While a man shouldn't have control over a woman's body, what's wrong with giving them a similar right? As for the latter, safe haven laws differ from place to place, but generally because no questions are asked, the father of the child practically no say, and those caring for the child have no means to contact them.	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 02:54 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Yes, but I don't see how that's a counterpoint. In a pregnant couple, the woman has the right to out out of parenthood but the father does not. After birth, the woman has the right to forfeit the child without consulting her partner. Do you disagree with anything I've said?	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 01:29 AM
2	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Not really. What if the man doesn't want the child but the woman does? The child stays with her, and the financial burden stays with him. And the thing is, that's not even a bad thing, because if she has no support she's in trouble. But if you don't at least give the man the option to walk away in the beginning, then what you're literally saying is "Women get a say in their parenthood, but men get none." As for the reverse situation, if a woman doesn't want her child, Safe Haven laws allow her t…	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 02:20 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Well aren't you lovely? We should be friends.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 05:17 AM
9	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter It's not made clear in the OP (to be fair it is a Tweet), but this is referring to parent rights before birth. Women have the right to opt out of parenthood (via abortion) but men have no such right. Once the woman is impregnated, the man's fate is entirely controlled by the woman. One solution is to allow men to opt out of parenthood while abortion is still an option. Another is to have men opt in. While this has its issues, it also solves things like undisclosed pregnancies.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 05:15 AM
7	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter I'm not saying you're wrong (fundamentally I agree with almost everything here) but I can understand why your words weren't well-received. You essentially walked into a discussion about a men's issue and said "But what about women?" I would say you go a step too far on the rape front. Even if a woman has raped a man, she still has rights over what happens to her body, and thus the fetus.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 05:02 AM
5	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter I'm not quite sure why you got downvotes. That metaphor is a great way of explaining why men should have the right to opt out of pregnancy. Maybe it wasn't immediately clear what position you were taking? Or maybe it's that you called it "complicated" instead of "open and shut"? I dunno.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 04:43 AM
6	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter I feel like you're missing the point here. Women have the option to opt out of pregnancy (via abortion). I'm glad that they have this option. But men should also have this option. While abortion is an option, men should have the choice to opt out of parenthood, just as a women can. This would be more fair, and if a woman doesn't want to be a single mother it gives her time to abort if she'd like. It's not shirking responsibilities. It's not taking them on in the first place. And doing so before …	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 04:34 AM
93	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter You had a discussion on TwoX without being banned? Colour me surprised.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 04:26 AM
8	Good to see this in public media! This is why I don't care for labels. I don't care what she calls herself, I agree with her ideas and that's what matters. The labels just muddle the conversation. In regards to the abortion point, it's a tricky matter. Women should have final say when it comes to carrying a fetus, but I do think that men should have the ability to opt out of parenthood too. Within reason, of course; the man should opt out while abortion is still on the table, but there should at least be the option. And while we…	/r/MensRights	07/02/18 05:27 PM
1	Harvard shutting down same-sex clubs, but female-only groups get “grace period” Doesn't that give them even less of a right? If it's off-campus, unrecognized, and receives no benefits, why would they have any say? Besides, private organizations don't have absolute say, so maybe there's a case there? I'm not a lawyer either (clearly).	/r/MensRights	07/02/18 03:38 PM
4	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." Well, I can't complain about wanting more information. I guess for now we just sit back and wait for what else is revealed (for and against).	/r/MensRights	05/02/18 01:29 AM
5	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." I didn't mean to suggest this guy was on a board or anything, but surely there's a difference between a bottom-level employee making such statements and a manager making them. And more importantly, since it corroborates Damore's position, it supports the idea that this is a common belief.	/r/MensRights	05/02/18 01:17 AM
40	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." First off, Google really shouldn't have people in higher positions that hold such absurd views. Second, a person doesn't make such an opinion unless they're comfortable making it. Either they're not a wise person (unlikely given they're a manager at Google) or they know it's permissible in the Google work environment. (Something that Damore suggested)	/r/MensRights	05/02/18 12:57 AM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." I just realized how much slower DDG is than Google. But even when controlling for that, Firefox is noticeably faster. I'd been thinking about switching for quite some time, but actually trying the new FIrefox sold it for me. Any idea if the mobile browser is worth it (on Android)?	/r/MensRights	05/02/18 12:43 AM
1	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." Revenue from paid accounts is used to further develop ProtonMail and support free users We do not show ads or make money by abusing your privacy More pricing information here. The free version is limited, but appears to be sufficient.	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 11:07 PM
3	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." Not if they're straight, as I understand it. That's why Taft (mentioned above) was allowed through.	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 11:01 PM
4	Google Manager to Employees: "Next time you get invited to speak at a conference, especially if you’re a white male – ask the organizer to confirm you’re the only white male on the panel / in the speaker lineup. If not, say you are honored, but must decline, and give the reason." The idea of a requirement to be of an "equity-seeking group" seemed so absurd I thought you were kidding. But no, it's just as absurd as I thought it might be. And just to clarify for others, NDP isn't the left-wing party, but they are furthest left, followed by the Liberal Party.	/r/MensRights	04/02/18 11:00 PM
1	They can't be wearing the same thing twice if they just wear nothing Something like this only really works if you're confident. When I was younger I'd almost definitely crumble under the criticism, but now I can't be bothered to care.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/02/18 04:57 PM
1	Jordan Peterson: Boys are being set up to fail \| "Decline in men at universities bad for both sexes" It seems we're on the same page here. A lot of kids end up going to college/university because they believe it's a requirement for success, but a degree isn't inherently with getting (from a career perspective). Hell, depending on what you want to get into, spending that time working is much better, and you actually make money too! And at the very least, you can always turn around and go back to school, but you can't back out of a debt.	/r/MensRights	03/02/18 11:13 PM
11	They can't be wearing the same thing twice if they just wear nothing The more I think about it, the more I regret not doing the same. 4 years of not needing to buy pants sounds awesome!	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 07:54 PM
5	They can't be wearing the same thing twice if they just wear nothing Sounds like a self-fulfilling prophesy to me ;) But hey, you do you. I know I'm happy with the way I dress, and that's all that matters to me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 06:34 PM
10	They can't be wearing the same thing twice if they just wear nothing Yeah, I was told to pick off what I could and then freeze it, but I tried scraping it off just now and no luck.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 06:23 PM
10	They can't be wearing the same thing twice if they just wear nothing Ehh, stains have more of a dirty, unprofessional feel to them, so I'm not as keen on that. But that really depends on who you are, what you do, and where you are in life. I've just got my day-of-the-week outfits. That way I can pretend to have variety without putting in any effort.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 06:19 PM
98	They can't be wearing the same thing twice if they just wear nothing I got gum on my favourite pair of jeans yesterday. If I can't get it out, I'm just going back and buying a handful of the same style. In fact, I'll probably end up doing that regardless.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/02/18 06:10 PM
3	Jordan Peterson: Boys are being set up to fail \| "Decline in men at universities bad for both sexes" It would be more appropriate if it were so across all groups. This is a decline in a specific group. And note that you're only stated a half-truth. University degrees are certainly of less value, but they're still considered a requisite in many fields. The real change is that you may need a Masters where previously a Bachelors sufficed.	/r/MensRights	03/02/18 05:54 PM
2	Pussy Pass Denied My best guess is she's internet famous? I guess that makes it permissible. Not sure why you've got this sort of reaction though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/02/18 05:05 AM
15	I told my boyfriend i want to fuck Brad Pitt I expected Cyanide and Happiness. I'm still okay with that though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/17 05:06 AM
1	She splashed hot water on the clerks face while the cop was right behind her. Allow me to rephrase that to better illustrate my point: Any individual who does what the OP claims needs to learn a lesson. Whether or not this particular individual has done so is irrelevant to me because they are anonymous and thus represent the idea, not themselves. As I said, if their name or face was revealed, I'd be with you. Your original comment was more focused on the accusation, not on the tazing itself. In that regard, I'd say we don't have enough to say whether the tazing was warran…	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/09/17 03:03 AM
71	She splashed hot water on the clerks face while the cop was right behind her. The sidebar does say "OTHER SITUATIONS WHERE WOMEN DO SOMETHING THAT IMPLIES THEY WILL SUFFER NO REPERCUSSIONS." Here, the act of throwing a drink in one's face is an action practically exclusive to women, and the act does revolve around expecting no repercussions. Also, do we really need someone to explicitly say "because I'm a woman" for this to be warranted? Most people aren't that direct.	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/09/17 02:42 AM
11	She splashed hot water on the clerks face while the cop was right behind her. Jsess said "It's always women doing this." You replied "Women are always [doing this]?" "Only A does B" does not imply "A always does B." Jsess's point is that practically speaking, the act of throwing drinks is exclusive to women. Anecdotal evidence supports this.	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/09/17 02:38 AM
1	She splashed hot water on the clerks face while the cop was right behind her. In their defence, this is just a nameless faceless person. If they put up either, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but for now I'm happy to say that any individual who treats a service worker that poorly needs to learn that's not okay. Although I do wonder whether the use of a taser was necessary here. I wish we had just a bit more footage of context.	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/09/17 02:20 AM
1	Suicide rate for teen girls hits 40 year high Wikipedia cites 64% as of 2012. Unless you have a counter-source (in which case nevermind) I'd be careful not to over-inflate the numbers.	/r/MensRights	18/09/17 04:29 PM
1	Suicide rate for teen girls hits 40 year high Are you talking about society or this thread? Because if the latter, that's an odd position to take.	/r/MensRights	18/09/17 04:26 PM
6	Suicide rate for teen girls hits 40 year high Sorry for the lazy source, but as per Wikipedia the gender ratio for suicide is 1.7 to 1 globally (towards men), and 3-4 to 1 in the West. This increases to ~10 to 1 for those 65 and older.	/r/MensRights	18/09/17 02:33 AM
19	Suicide rate for teen girls hits 40 year high I don't think anyone is saying we shouldn't focus on the suicide if teen girls, but that it's unfair than men have (and are) the primary victims of suicide yet they still don't get attention. No one would have a problem with a "let's stop suicide" campaign. It's the fact that it takes a woman's suffering for society to care that is frustrating. The central point you're making is not false, but I don't think anyone was contesting that to begin with.	/r/MensRights	18/09/17 02:19 AM
14	'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands I'm with you, save one minor correction: it can be argued that they don't believe him more than here, they simply don't think there's enough evidence to convict him in that charge. It's a minor difference, but I think it's important when it comes to the philosophy of the law. Otherwise, spot on. There's no evidence that she's committed perjury. Although I will add - if her story was considered inconsistent, isn't that sufficient grounds to rule that he shouldn't have to pay her court fees?	/r/MensRights	16/09/17 01:54 PM
2	Guy destroys feminist live on Sky News It's one of those things I know I should strive for, but man is it hard. At the very least, the woman in the clip above is a great reminder of what your anger looks like from the outside.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/09/17 10:43 PM
2	Conan destroys Jennifer Garner! Oldy but a goody! I speak it natively, and I still struggle with tone, so I definitely get it. Helps to discern other languages better though. Polish (based on some cursory Googling) has a lot of genders and cases. There's 17 different forms of "two"! It's no wonder it's such a difficult language. Especially comparing it to the simpler English, that seems nigh impossible to learn fluently as an outsider.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/09/17 05:02 PM
200	Guy destroys feminist live on Sky News The best part about her reaction is she was given an out. She just had to laugh along and say something like "that's pretty clever" and she'd have come across as endearing. His point would have flopped. There was an easy way out of this. Just not for an angry person.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/09/17 04:44 PM
13	I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrong At the end of the day, it really does just feel like mansplain came about as a way to vilify men. "Condescending" worked perfectly. And then further, as you say, it's changed to fit whatever definition that's required.	/r/MensRights	07/09/17 05:53 PM
26	I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrong Why can't we just refer to this as condescension? Everyone receives it, and everyone expresses it. So why make up a new gendered term?	/r/MensRights	07/09/17 05:17 PM
1	Conan destroys Jennifer Garner! Oldy but a goody! Oh that's crazy, I'd never heard of that before. There's a little graphic on Wikipedia showing how the vowel sounds changed and converged (eg. "day" and "name" eventually settling on the same "a" sound). So many new things to learn! My native language (Punjabi) is the only tonal language of South Asia, and apparently it's because Punjab used to be the main point of people passing into or out of the region, so we were exposed to a lot of different languages. If that could impart tone onto us, an …	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/17 05:09 PM
1	Conan destroys Jennifer Garner! Oldy but a goody! Oh don't get me wrong, there's a perfectly good reason for why English is so messy. I'm just pointing out that the mess is there, and that it's easier to accept that than to defend its flimsy "structure." I'm not even saying it's a bad language. I think it's fascinating with it's origins, the efforts to absorb everything it likes about other languages1, and the numerous failed attempts to make things make more sense (part of the reason for the British/American English divide). Also, why do we co…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/17 04:12 AM
3	Soon they'll be eating their own and hopefully that will be the end I have no idea what's going on anymore, but I really enjoyed Bob Mortimer in that episode.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/09/17 09:12 PM
1	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this I'd say that a 1500-word document (a 6 minute read on average (yes, I checked)) is sufficiently long, but if you still disagree, it's seems we've reached an impasse. Have a wonderful day.	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 06:51 PM
2	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this My question regarding labels was because I feel like one could still participate in change without subscribing to a movement. Though maybe that’s just my anti-label bias. As for the pay gap, the main thing I wanted to discern was whether you thought women were paid less for identical work, or whether biases affected the proportionality of women in certain jobs. It should go without saying that I consider the former to be indefensible. The latter I consider more complex, but not wrong. So I kinda…	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 05:46 PM
1	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this I meant article as a generalized item. While the whole thing is loosely relevant, you used the link to support the point that 'toxic masculinity' is real, but 'toxic femininity' is hate speech (according to them). It would've been useful to be more precise. I did a search and a quick read-through, and saw nothing. But more importantly, you took /u/AnorexicBuddha's request in the worst light imaginably, which I think is unfair. Asking for a quote is not dishonest or trolling.	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 05:02 PM
1	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this I've never been good at suppressing rage, but once in a while someone says something aggressive and I realize if I play it cool I can make them look like the jerk. It's never fun to be yelled at, but if you take the hit, you can better sway the audience.	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 04:57 PM
2	Conan destroys Jennifer Garner! Oldy but a goody! You're spot on for what English is and how it formed. My point was more about how twisted the "rules" are, and how there's practically no structure that is set in stone. The ease of its spread is why it became so universal, and it does have a certain level of appeal in it's simplicity (gender throws me off even in my native language). That said, having dealt with many who have learned English as adults, after a certain point, the answer to every question is just "English is weird, don't make sen…	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/09/17 04:50 PM
1	Conan destroys Jennifer Garner! Oldy but a goody! According to Wikipedia, some experts think there are too many exceptions to consider the rule useful, and I'm inclined to agree.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/09/17 04:42 PM
1	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this I disagree with /u/AnorexicBuddha's position in the discussion, but I agree with them here. You linked to a fairly long article, and a search for "toxic femininity" on the page returns only the name of the event in question. It's not unreasonable to ask for you to reference the relevant bit. You took their request to be a sign of dishonest discourse and trolling, and I consider that poor form.	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 03:36 AM
4	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this Out of curiosity, why do you feel that equal pay and ending human trafficking are good reasons to be a feminist rather than, say, an egalitarian? Do you perceive a particular benefit to associating with a particular group over another, or rather than simply standing up against the issues without any label at all? Additionally, what is your stance on the subject of equal pay? There's been a good deal of discussion on the matter, and simply stating "equal" pay no longer sufficiently expresses an i…	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 03:18 AM
2	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this I'm just jumping in here stoic, and emotionally distant Would you mind elaborating on why you feel these are masculine traits? I feel like despite being told this numerous times, it has always been contrary to my experiences.	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 03:11 AM
4	Got tired of explaining the hypocrisy to people so I made this I often say if you're not a feminist then you're a bigot. I mean there is nothing in between. - Gloria Allred	/r/MensRights	06/09/17 02:33 AM
4	Conan destroys Jennifer Garner! Oldy but a goody! English is a ridiculous language. Anyone who insists that rules or structure needs to be followed must first defend the spelling of 'weird,' because no matter how much bullshit you tack onto the mnemonic, it still explains nothing. Or 'science' for that matter, despite science being predicated on following the rules!	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/09/17 02:16 AM
1	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant I just Googled "loreal transgender." NBC reports that reactions are mixed, with some retweeting "#BoycottLoreal." Time gives a similar report, also suggesting a mixed reaction. The Root/Grapevine (idk it's the 3rd link on Google) defends Bergdorf, and suggests public outcry, but it's very biased. So the public reaction isn't as negative as I suspected, but there seems to be some level of backlash.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/09/17 04:14 PM
1	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant With 23 comments and 24 karma, I don't think that post is very representative. Still great to see that sort of response. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to believe everyone saw this for the bigotry it is. That just doesn't seem to be the case. As I pointed out in another comment, the first 3 Google links all suggest mixed-to-poor reactions to this news, albeit the "poor" result was from a biased article from a source I've never heard of (The Grapevine). At the very least, "#BoycottLoreal" says a lo…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/09/17 03:12 PM
2	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant lol I've never seen that commercial before. That's amazing Admittedly I did feel a bit emasculated when the guy said "Does a French woman ever have a bad hair day?" but I don't care. My hair is fabulous.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/09/17 03:17 AM
14	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant I guess there's no room for nuance when you view the world as black and white. No pun intended, but damn does that phrase fit beautifully. I mean I still disagree with the nuanced approach, but it makes far more sense than "You can't be racist to white people" or "We've redefined racism so that it only applies to you."	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/09/17 11:40 PM
1	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant As I just said to Radioactive, I don't think most people are seeking better treatment, I just think they're more likely to misinterpret negativity for bigotry. I was wondering if you had any thoughts of that, coming from the 'inside' as it were.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/09/17 08:38 PM
2	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant It's a lot easier to misinterpret intent when the victim is associated with victimhood. We're so sold on this idea of racism and transgenderism that we default to assuming any negativity towards them is just bigotry. That's not to say that it's never bigotry, but when you're already looking for it, it's easier to see it where it's not. I don't think most of them are looking to be treated better. I think they just forget that sometimes everyone gets treated shitty. That said, I don't disagree at …	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/09/17 08:31 PM
27	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant Since I was a child, I've associated L'oreal with their "No Tears" line, but I definitely think more highly of them than I used to. I'll probably stick with my Tresemme though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/09/17 08:24 PM
636	L'Oreal's SACKS its first transgender model after she blasted 'ALL white people are racist' in shocking Facebook rant I'm glad they had the balls to fire their model for bigoted views in spite of their transgenderism. I'm sure they'll get a lot of backlash for their decision, but I'm glad they opted to treat a minority transgendered individual the same as they would anyone else.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/09/17 02:56 PM
11	Mom cuts off her own son's penis to get back at ex-husband Sounds like he's recovering fine physically, and I hope he's going enough mentally for the psychological boot to screw him up too much. I think he'll be just fine.	/r/MensRights	25/08/17 04:18 PM
39	Mom cuts off her own son's penis to get back at ex-husband "What, are you saying it's cruel because he has to live without a dick Because spoiler alert, women have to do it all the time!" (not arguing against anyone in particular, just a silly thought)	/r/MensRights	25/08/17 04:16 PM
1	Even Game of Thrones is not immune to this bullshit Well if I am an idiot, I'm just doing the best I can. Have a wonderful day.	/r/MensRights	17/08/17 09:43 PM
1	Even Game of Thrones is not immune to this bullshit The scene shows that Ned's not the father, that Lyanna is the mother, and that Jon's parentage is significant and at least somewhat offensive. I feel like we're going in circles. I'm just going to keep saying that it's basically true but not fully confirmed, and you're going to stand by your position as well. We can just disagree on this.	/r/MensRights	17/08/17 06:51 PM
1	Even Game of Thrones is not immune to this bullshit If we're talking books, maybe. I haven't read them myself. If we're talking about the show, not yet. It's heavily implied to the point where we basically know, but that's mostly because the theory is so widely known and loved. It's still plausible for show-Jon to not be a Targaryen.	/r/MensRights	16/08/17 08:36 PM
1	Even Game of Thrones is not immune to this bullshit Given your -12 upvotes, it wouldn't have hurt.	/r/MensRights	16/08/17 04:35 PM
1	Even Game of Thrones is not immune to this bullshit Not available outside the US, apparently. But even besides that, it's not confirmed in the book, and the show has yet to present sufficient evidence. It's pretty much definitely true, but it's never been stated explicitly.	/r/MensRights	16/08/17 04:35 PM
2	Even Game of Thrones is not immune to this bullshit In that Lyanna is the mother and Ned not the father, yes. The Targaryen bloodline could still prove to be false, though I'm not arguing that's the case.	/r/MensRights	16/08/17 04:34 PM
5	Even Game of Thrones is not immune to this bullshit It's a fan theory that's all but confirmed, but no one knows for certain. Would have been a bigger shock had you not heard though.	/r/MensRights	16/08/17 03:07 PM
1	Does this count? Really, that's when we should have exited the video. The rest of the ensuing horror was on us.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/08/17 04:39 PM
2	Does this count? Dang. Plus, I missed out on all the sweet, sweet karma!	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/08/17 02:57 AM
16	Does this count? [Unfortunately, yes](?t=1m11s) Skip to 1:11, or better yet, skip the video entirely. It'll just drive you mad. Edit: Goddamnit. Link.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/17 10:39 PM
1	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 You cannot reason someone out of a position if they reasoned themselves into it. I disagree. If someone believes something due to an emotional appeal, evidence rarely sways them, but if someone comes to a conclusion because of evidence, evidence to the contrary can and often does. As soon as you see that valid evidence is being dismissed by someone, you've determined that emotion plays more of a role in their position than evidence does. The best I can grant is that people can reason their way i…	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 05:56 PM
1	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 I'm going to need you to elaborate on that. Had you said "everything," I might have been inclined to agree, but you specifically said "anything."	/r/MensRights	10/08/17 03:09 AM
2	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Dang it, I've been made!	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 08:05 PM
10	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 "You cannot reason people out of a position that they did not reason themselves into." The problem with the current state of affairs is that it cannot welcome differing views because it views dissent as bigotry. Think about it this way - The title of the memo was Google's Ideological Echo Chamber, and in response Google fired him for speaking outside the narrative. When you have Sundar Pichai making false claims about the contents of the memo in order to denounce it, it should be evident that th…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 05:41 PM
1	"Congrats Media, You Proved the Google Memo Right" All the evidence behind the memo and what the media lied about I believe you misunderstood my comment. We're both stating that Zunger misrepresented Damore. I'm just going a step further and saying Brown and Pichai did so as well.	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 05:23 PM
78	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Well, I'm happy to report that the story isn't quite that simple. former employers BAE Systems tried to pull back the huge sum claiming it was an “affront to justice” over “one sexist comment”. The Court of Appeal heard how Ms Konczak suffered a mental breakdown after being told in 2007 that “women take things more emotionally than men, whilst men tend to forget things and move on.” The tribunal upheld a complaint of sexual discrimination but either rejected or made no finding on 15 other sex di…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 03:52 PM
1	"Congrats Media, You Proved the Google Memo Right" All the evidence behind the memo and what the media lied about "You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into." Additionally, you're mistaken. Many have said that the memo is false and incorrect. The problem is that none of them have actually addressed the memo. Zunger, Brown, and Pichai have all misrepresented the memo, so they're either incapable of understanding a differing opinion, or it's more important to them to look right than to be right.	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 03:44 PM
1	"Congrats Media, You Proved the Google Memo Right" All the evidence behind the memo and what the media lied about A lot of the criticism of "leftists" are directed towards "modern leftists" or "progressivists." We're at the point where a lot of people will explicitly label themselves as "classical liberals" because they feel the need to separate themselves with the new beast that has arisen, and I think they're right to do so. I don't think that the right is particularly immune to this sort of behavior, but there has been an emergence of a leftist ideology, and as evidenced by this whole debacle, dissent is…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 03:36 PM
15	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 The downvotes probably correlate to the implication that you're correlating all women with feminism. Rather than condemning the people, had you said "feminism is worthless" you'd likely have been better received. Remember, there are also men who contribute to the problem, and women who fight against it. Treating groups as monoliths is what we condemn feminism for, so we must make sure not to follow suit.	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 03:18 PM
51	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 I need you to source that for me, because I refuse to believe people could be that stupid. How could anyone make that claim with a straight face? How do you tell a judge you're suing a man because what he said happens happened? I cannot accept this level of stupidity.	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 02:41 PM
2	Male only barbershop under fire for refusing to allow women inside That's exactly how I took it to mean. 'Many' is a large number, but it says nothing about frequency, and I'm certain that's where TreeGoatee's understanding went a bit off.	/r/MensRights	08/08/17 05:08 PM
1	Male only barbershop under fire for refusing to allow women inside I think there's an inherent bias in your position as someone who did/does have a desire for attention. That's not to say that you're right or you're wrong, but people tend to inflate their own experiences more than they should. I know I do the same thing. But coming back to the point, /u/Mythandros specifically said "most men don't" and "many women do." They almost seemed to carefully avoid making generalizations about women so as to avoid the sort of response they got from you. Anyways, I thoug…	/r/MensRights	07/08/17 08:58 PM
10	Male only barbershop under fire for refusing to allow women inside Obligatory Bill Burr reference.	/r/MensRights	07/08/17 08:53 PM
1	Male only barbershop under fire for refusing to allow women inside Gotta love George Carlin when it comes to this stuff. His bit on soft language really nails it if you ask me. English is a language oh extreme exaggeration. We will always take things as far as we can. But if you think the solution is to change words, remember how well "special needs" worked out?	/r/MensRights	07/08/17 08:33 PM
1	Male only barbershop under fire for refusing to allow women inside It's very atypical to call someone with mental disabilities retarded, at least in Western culture today. While retard is still used as an insult, even using the word in the presence of a mentally disabled person is grounds for embarrassment and shame.	/r/MensRights	07/08/17 08:26 PM
3	Tyson knows. I'll go a step further: The vast majority do not. It's a very small minority who actually think women are without merit, and even they are downvoted for those views.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/08/17 04:33 PM
4	Tyson knows. Being shitty isn't unique to women. I agree, but particular forms of being shitty certainly are. There are subreddits that criticize neckbeards and red pill people too. This is neither unusual nor surprising given human nature. Fetishizing that to the point this sub does is done by people who want to blame women for their problems Where are you getting this from? Look at the top comments from this thread. None of them blame women for men's issues. Hell, I tried and I couldn't find any comments l…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/08/17 04:22 PM
5	Tyson knows. Creating a community that focuses on only women getting their comeuppance is a disgusting waste of time. I think the difference is of scale. When it happens once, it's annoying. When it happens regularly, creating an outlet doesn't seem so strange. And given the number<sup>1</sup> of posts made here (and those are only recorded instances), I'd say the issue is pervasive. Stop caring. Stop caring about how much or little others care? Jerking each other off over women getting put down... That's no…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/08/17 03:10 PM
4	Tyson knows. There was also a study done that showed women are given a 2:1 bias in STEM tenure tracks. I can't link at the moment (edit: link) but at the very least, I think it's fair to say the bias goes both ways. It's dumb that women are selected against in the orchestra, but suggesting the solution is to select for them is ridiculous (not that you suggested this).	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/08/17 02:46 PM
5	Tyson knows. I think it's unfair to suggest the intent of this subreddit is to put down half the population. While it does focus on women, it's a particular subset of women who are being critiqued; the ones who are using the advantages granted to them as women to an extreme level, and in that sense "deserve" to be "put in their place." Now of course there's some people here who are just sexist, but that's true of any group. You're generalizations are gross and misrepresentative. Or, continue to make shitty a…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/08/17 02:37 PM
1	Found this on a pole in my university. Seriously? To be fair, the posters there seemed to be fine with there being a rapee/rapist bot for both men and women. The ones who were downvoted were generally sexual puritans. Maybe you meant a double standard in light of a greater group, but in terms of that specific post, everyone seemed to be on the same page (ie. sex bots for whomever).	/r/MensRights	02/08/17 03:05 PM
1	Apparently pointing out female privilege is not welcome outside of /r/mensrights That's a really good point. With the sheer number of studies out there, you can find something supporting any position. And given the above, if the best your 'opponent' can come back with is a bad one, that's telling of their position.	/r/MensRights	25/07/17 02:14 PM
4	Apparently pointing out female privilege is not welcome outside of /r/mensrights To be fair, I use "citation needed" as well. I don't have the time or will to verify every claim myself, so I ask the other side to provide a source. If it's weak or absent, there you go. This isn't the most accurate approach, but its efficiency more than makes up for that. I don't disagree that some use "citation needed" as a silencer, but it has its uses.	/r/MensRights	25/07/17 03:19 AM
6	Rapist expects 15 years sentence, gets 0 years and walks free because... she's a woman I don't even understand. I made several points. Which do you reject? 1) Teens can legally consent to each other. 2) Romeo and Juliet laws protect certain teen/adult couples. 3) Generally, a child cannot legally consent to sex with an adult. Also, again, if you disagree with the law, what do you think it should be?	/r/MensRights	08/07/17 10:53 PM
9	Rapist expects 15 years sentence, gets 0 years and walks free because... she's a woman Teenagers can consent with each other, and there are "Romeo and Juliet" laws, but generally a child cannot consent to sex with an adult as per the law. Thus, this is statutory rape. Although I believe you're arguing for your opinion rather than about the law. In that case, what do you think the law should be?	/r/MensRights	08/07/17 10:33 PM
2	Feminists take down AFA Facebook page with 70,000 fans - Anti-Feminism Australia I wouldn't bother. It might constitute trying to get around a ban (which gets your IP banned or something I don't know). But also, what's the point? It just incites rage, and gets us nowhere.	/r/MensRights	30/06/17 07:24 PM
3	Feminists take down AFA Facebook page with 70,000 fans - Anti-Feminism Australia At least your ban from 2xchromosomes was for something you did. I also got banned just for participating in the wrong circles. Although, I did get banned from feminism for dissent. I had said 2 things: [1] That sometimes yes means no and no means yes (I provided 2 sources), and [2] that we shouldn't call Roosh a rapist without evidence. That's all it tooked, and I was banned. I tried asking the mods what I did wrong. Banned from messaging them. So that was fun.	/r/MensRights	30/06/17 07:20 PM
39	Who Would Win? Vidcon edition: answered I'm not disagreeing, but I think he just needed to vent and Rogan let him. If I was insulted before an audience and didn't have the opportunity to defend myself, I'd be pretty salty too.	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/06/17 08:19 PM
137	Who Would Win? Vidcon edition: answered But also, to be fair, Sargon is pretty alright about not directing his fans to attack her, and the bulk of what he's saying is valid criticism of Anita's arguments which she has never addressed, as far as I'm aware. I'm not trying to suggest you're implying otherwise. I'm just filling out additional information here, for those passing by. And I guess if I'm striving for completion's sake, Sargon isn't exactly superb about keeping his following away from Sarkeesian, in that he's not putting up hu…	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/06/17 07:59 PM
1	19 Year old College student faces two years in jail, after falsely accusing two football players of rape. She later confessed she lied about being sexually assaulted to get sympathy from a prospective boyfriend I don't trust people who've never been auto-banned. Gotta go against the grain once ina while. Also, surprisingly r/feminism is better than 2xwhatever in in this regard. At least they waited for me to go against their narrative before banning me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	27/06/17 07:45 PM
2	Just remember guys, this is the real reason Feminism is a terroristic ideology. They have way too much power. I don't understand that logic. Just because I cannot check to verify my doubt, doens't mean I'll magically stop being doubtful. If anything, that would just drive me further and further away, whereas getting the matter over and settled would put it to rest once and for all.	/r/MensRights	23/06/17 11:31 PM
11	Seems that teaching students "Men are guilty until proven innocent" is now a priority It's the whole discussion about separating the art from the artist, but one step further. When I watch basketball, I don't care about the individuals personal lives. If they play well and we are winning, I'm happy. I'm not about to research each individual to make sure I align with them philosophically before I root for a team.	/r/MensRights	23/06/17 04:40 PM
1	Comedian Joe Rogan physically assaulted by feminist; smacks her down - only 240p sry For the record, whether you're saying someone is dense or is being dense, it comes across as you insulting their intellect. It's the same as if you were to say they are stupid or they're being stupid. You may have meant it in the technically correct way, but understand that language is a tool for communication, so you should account for subjectivity to be most effective.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/06/17 01:38 AM
1	These are the kind of women we are up against I think they were exaggerating; it's not that no one cares, but that there's not as much opposition as the original tweeter was suggesting.	/r/MensRights	16/06/17 01:09 PM
2	These are the kind of women we are up against I think both child support and alimony make sense, but they definitely need a major reworking if they're to stay in place. Fathers also need a way to opt out of parenthood while reasonable (their inability to falls under that "enslavement"), and there needs to be a better system in place for checking paternity fraud. I believe it's in France that a father can't go get a DNA test without the mother's consent. I don't particularly like the use of the term "enslavement" in this context, but I under…	/r/MensRights	16/06/17 12:57 PM
2	"You're arresting a girl, for no fucking reason." -she says after spitting in a persons face. With the 'victim,' typically they just want acknowledgement of the problem, and some initiative to change. Just as you said. With the 'accused,' there's a need to explain their position. This isn't necessarily a justification, but as a society we tend to conflate the two, which leads to unnecessary complications. Obviously there are those who try to absolve their guilt by justifying their actions ("It wasn't me, it was the alcohol") but I think most people just want the other to understand what …	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/06/17 06:09 PM
14	And she's gone It is entirely not. She has every right to make whatever art she'd like to. But she's not entitled to receive financial support.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 01:13 PM
3	Feminists in a nutshell Please stop. I've just woken up and you're hurting my brain.	/r/MensRights	09/06/17 01:03 PM
19	Feminists in a nutshell Tangent about Reddit formatting: Reddit handles ordered lists by removing all your control. If you write "#." it will either create a new ordered list or add to the existing one. So if I write 4 15 2, it will appear as follows: And if you have a gap, Reddit will assume you want a new list. So if I now write 4 to continue, it will appear as so: Here's the workaround: 4) 15) 2) And with a pause, 4) Or, as morerokk pointed out below, put a backslash before the period (eg. 6\.)	/r/MensRights	09/06/17 04:21 AM
2	Astounding moderation from 2X. Even got a non-bot reply. Not cool. I got banned from /r/Feminism for dissent, which I'm pretty proud of. At least /r/TwoXChromosomes responds when you question it though; when I tried to ask what I'd done wrong, I just got banned from messaging the moderators for 72 hours.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 02:53 AM
12	Dumb teenage girl arrested for making false terrorist threats on twitter. Says "don't, I'm just a girl." I love how she said "I was joking and it was a friend not me" in the same breath, as if she doesn't realize the contradiction. And then she tosses her (unnamed) friend under the bus.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 02:38 AM
10	'I want to burn the White House down': Accused NSA leaker Reality Winner is DENIED bail as prosecutors claim she wanted to pledge her allegiance to the Taliban and planned to play the 'pretty, white girl' card in court Relevant. Terrible quality video, but still funny.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 02:36 AM
1	Feminist believes all terrorists are men. Gets fucking destroyed. (x-post r/CringeAnarchy) 15% is dramatically higher than 0%. To all those who claim all terrorists are men, their argument has failed spectacularly. Assuming both genders are equally likely to participate or be pressed into in this kind of violence, the baseline is 50%, not 0%. I believe you misread my point. In that bit you quoted, I indicated it was a rebuttal to the claim that men commit all terrorist attacks. Otherwise, you are correct, but point C deals with that. I didn't suggest the reason for the disparity at al…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 02:25 AM
1	Feminist believes all terrorists are men. Gets fucking destroyed. (x-post r/CringeAnarchy) My main point was to combat the viewpoint that men commit all terrorist attacks, not that the genders are equally violent. That said, violent behaviors are measured in varying ways, and I don't think terrorist attacks are a good way to measure it. IPV is arguably a better measure in my opinion (deals more with individuals than with organizations) and there, the numbers are more even.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/06/17 02:15 AM
11	Feminist believes all terrorists are men. Gets fucking destroyed. (x-post r/CringeAnarchy) a) 15% is dramatically higher than 0%. To all those who claim all terrorists are men, their argument has failed spectacularly. b) Note the reason why female suicide bombers are used. Women are perceived to be less of a threat. Terrorists are using our preconceptions against us. c) Men are expendable. It's the same reason why >99% of combat and workplace fatalities are men.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/06/17 10:17 PM
1	This👌🏻 It's definitely funny. I enjoy it though; I'm usually the awkward one, so getting to watch other people squirm is always fun. And yea, that really is the best some can do. The fear of being racist thing has gotten out of hand. We've become so caught up in not saying the wrong thing that we've forgotten that racism is about the intent behind the message. All we've really done is given racists a roadmap to hide their bigotry, and meanwhile we're false-flagging every schmuck who hasn't updated thei…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/06/17 03:42 AM
1	This👌🏻 It definitely depends on the country. Here in Canada no one ever seems to care, but in the US everyone seems to be on edge. Then again, I definitely felt a subtle racism permeating through the US that I didn't feel up North, so I'm guessing it's related. And just because I've brought it up, in Canada I've never been treated differently because I wear a turban, whether I'm in a small town or in Toronto. I spent 4 months in NYC, and everyday people were staring at me on the subway. No one ever say…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/06/17 08:41 PM
1	This👌🏻 It's not. But some people always take things in the worst way. I've had people refer to my turban as "head-thing," but I realize they're usually just uncomfortable and don't know what to say. But there's always someone who's a little too eager to be angry.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/06/17 08:30 PM
2	This👌🏻 I really wish willpower was just a switch you could turn on. You're spot on though. Virtually every personal challenge just comes down to willpower, so saying that's easy is saying everything's easy.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/06/17 06:01 PM
1	This👌🏻 I'm 6'2" and 165 lb, and my thyroid's normal. If anything, you might need to exert a little less willpower. Seriously though, kudos. My mother's got hypothyroidism, so even if you're underselling it, I know how hard it can be.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/06/17 06:00 PM
10	This👌🏻 The nice thing about not being white is that I can say black and brown without social repercussion. Yellow's still out though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/06/17 05:57 PM
2	Woman hits a very pacient man until... I understand the sentiment behind your position, I just don't agree with the practicality of it here. Let me ask you this: In what circumstances would her actions be considered a reasonable response? Now, of those circumstances, which of those seems plausible? I realize your examples were extreme, but I think that's the point. I don't think there is a non-extreme example that satisfies both criteria.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/17 12:46 AM
1	Woman hits a very pacient man until... Considering any context that might reasonably apply here (ie. not him murdering her parents), I can't see a position where her reaction could be justified. What, he gave her an STD so she punched him in the face 37 times?	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/06/17 09:01 PM
22	Woman hits a very pacient man until... Right? I thought she was going to go down. I mean she still seems like a horrible person (at least in that she can't control her rage) but apparently she can take a punch pretty dang well.	/r/PussyPassDenied	31/05/17 09:10 PM
1	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. I'd say it works fine on mine, but it's pretty unreliable. But when it wants to work, it does work. Now that I'm thinking about it, I really should turn it off; it's not like I use it.	/r/MensRights	31/05/17 04:49 AM
1	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. As per the OP: The woman who took it said I threw it down after I was confronted for videotaping children.	/r/MensRights	30/05/17 10:33 PM
3	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. Let me frame it another way. If we take for granted a few points; that he is a pedophile, and that he is recording children for sexual gratification; it is not illogical that he would smash his phone to hide these facts. I completely agree that making these assumptions is wrong, but what I'm saying is that once you've made these assumptions, the conclusion logically follows. Again, I'm on the side of the father here.	/r/MensRights	30/05/17 10:14 PM
3	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. I don't recall ever having to enable it, and my phone doesn't seem to notice the change (and it's a good 4-5 years old). But it's probably a case-by-case sort of thing. I stand by the modernity point though; I'd be shocked if a phone bought in 2017 couldn't handle always-on audio.	/r/MensRights	30/05/17 10:11 PM
6	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. You could have just gone with that third section, but instead you had to respond as if even questioning an odd occurrence is an attack on your person. Do you realize how poor of an attitude that is? What would be so hard about just saying "I face some medical issues, so I'm using an imperfect transcription system." What would be so hard about treating the other person with the same respect that you yourself are looking for?	/r/MensRights	30/05/17 09:52 PM
10	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. Her argument is that he was there to record children, as pedophiles do, and when he was discovered, he smashed his phone to hide the evidence. It's a disgusting argument for her to make, but it's logically sound. At least internally; the logic that a man has a camera at a park and is therefore a pedophile is beyond stupid.	/r/MensRights	30/05/17 09:47 PM
4	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. Does it? iPhones are constantly listening for "Hey Siri," and Androids for "Okay Google." As far as I know, it's negligible on modern phones.	/r/MensRights	30/05/17 09:45 PM
3	Accused of being a pedo for taking my daughter to the park. I was arrested for not allowing a cop into my home without a warrant, recorded the entire thing. They confiscated my phone as "evidence" in an attempt to hinder my defense in court. I know that the legal system doesn't always work ideally, but what would their argument have been? It's not like they could forge a warrant without a judge aiding in their crime, and at that point there's nothing you can do in any case. Or would they have argued that you were being hostile to the point that an arrest…	/r/MensRights	30/05/17 09:43 PM
2	Woman throws dog shit at cop for inconveniencing her walk with a crime scene That's what I get for copy-pasting. Thanks!	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/05/17 10:53 PM
3	Irony Time - The Red Pill Wins "Women In Film Award" I'm still not fond of shots though. If it's nice stuff, I'll drink it nice and slow while everyone else winces at the burn.	/r/MensRights	26/05/17 11:02 PM
1	Woman throws dog shit at cop for inconveniencing her walk with a crime scene Mine too, except mine is mostly mad at me :(	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/05/17 08:51 PM
2	Woman throws dog shit at cop for inconveniencing her walk with a crime scene Yes, precisely. We are in perfect agreement! Well, I guess that's all. Have a wonderful day.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/05/17 06:40 PM
2	Woman throws dog shit at cop for inconveniencing her walk with a crime scene Well start of this thread stated that it was bad parenting was why this grown ass lady acted the way she did; effectively removing the responsibility from her and placing it on her parents. I feel like we have an issue differentiating fault and responsibility. This woman's parents appear to be at fault for raising her poorly (so we argue here). That doesn't mean she's not responsible for improving herself, or for the repercussions of her actions.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/05/17 05:55 PM
3	Irony Time - The Red Pill Wins "Women In Film Award" Most people don't enjoy straight alcohol, but they'll tolerate it to get the fast buzz. It's good stuff though; I'll take liquor over beer any day.	/r/MensRights	26/05/17 05:40 PM
2	Irony Time - The Red Pill Wins "Women In Film Award" I have this guy tagged as "Dr. Boner - PhD in ejaculate." I'm gonna go ahead and trust him on this one.	/r/MensRights	26/05/17 05:38 PM
2	Woman throws dog shit at cop for inconveniencing her walk with a crime scene The Drunk God is the best God.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/05/17 05:25 PM
1	Woman throws dog shit at cop for inconveniencing her walk with a crime scene Yea I still don't get how we got from "bad parenting" to "no responsibility." We're allowed to say both.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/05/17 05:24 PM
6	Woman throws dog shit at cop for inconveniencing her walk with a crime scene There's a quote that goes something like this: Hard times make hard men, hard men make soft times, Soft times make soft men, Soft men make hard times. It's not an infinite lineage of shitty parenthood. We're all just a product of our surroundings, whatever they may be.	/r/PussyPassDenied	26/05/17 05:23 PM
1	If a girl tells me to stop, should I? \| Interesting answer to this question on Quora As a side note to what else has been said, many places have one-sided laws, meaning as long as 1 of the recorded parties is aware, it's legal. I encourage everyone to learn the laws of their land though, just to be sure.	/r/MensRights	22/05/17 08:40 PM
5	If a girl tells me to stop, should I? \| Interesting answer to this question on Quora I had this idea in my head about how you could always just abort at the slightest hint of hesitation and essentially just tease them until they give you a clear answer. But then I remembered even a solid yes won't save a man from a false accusation. Sometimes I wonder if an always-on voice recorder would be enough evidence, or if even that would get trumped by a woman's testimony.	/r/MensRights	19/05/17 08:07 PM
7	If a girl tells me to stop, should I? \| Interesting answer to this question on Quora I wonder how accurate such a study could be. They can only consider women who either admit to lying or are caught doing so. There would be a bias towards them, which means that the motives of the really tricksy women is essentially going unnoticed.	/r/MensRights	19/05/17 07:53 PM
1	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community When did I ever say I was a feminist? That wasn't the main point. And as much as I like your sophomore of high school level arguments you still haven't addressed any of my main points that support my proof. Your logic is still floored You failed to rebut by rebuttals. I will now be disengaging from any further conversation. Okay. Have a wonderful day.	/r/MensRights	17/05/17 07:49 PM
2	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community The specific claim to which I refer is "critics are just as much to blame in redefining the movement as the corrupted members of that group." To this point, you had given me no evidence or line of argument in this specific thread. Perhaps elsewhere under this post, but not directed to me. You can't even spell defense. Both "defence" and "defense" are accepted spellings of the word, but more telling is that you attempt to attack my spelling at all (especially considering the following). Basic log…	/r/MensRights	17/05/17 07:20 PM
1	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community The onus is on you, my friend. We accept a claim when it has sufficient evidence, not when it cannot be disproven (which is notably distinct from the null hypothesis). Additionally, you haven't made a defence yet, just stated a claim. As such, there's no logic to find fault in.	/r/MensRights	17/05/17 05:33 PM
1	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community Oh jeez, I haven't seen that movie in ages. But yea, pretty much exactly that.	/r/MensRights	17/05/17 02:20 AM
1	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community That doesn't make sense to me. The critics aren't just saying whatever they'd like and ruining the movement. They are commenting on that which derives from feminism. You might argue that the critics amplify the bad by giving it attention, but the root cause comes from within the movement, from those doing that which you deem wrong.	/r/MensRights	17/05/17 02:18 AM
12	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community Say your kindergarten class hates the other kindergarten class. One day, you think "Why do we hate them?" So you start talking to them to see what they're like. But then your class gets mad at you, and they say "Why are you friends with them? You must be bad, just like them!" That's how Jaye felt as a feminist exploring the MRM.	/r/MensRights	16/05/17 04:26 AM
6	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community What if you feel that the movement is corrupt? That it no longer acts in accordance with what it once stood for, and now the negatives done in its name outweigh its goals?	/r/MensRights	16/05/17 04:19 AM
6	If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community a) No True Scotsman. b) It's not just "Tumblrista" feminists; classic example would be "Big Red," but what of those who made women the default caregiver (which is ironically a complaint now), or those who attacked Erin Pizzey for suggesting IPV was oft reciprocal?	/r/MensRights	16/05/17 04:16 AM
1	You're a dude. You're literally a man. Wow, they were taunting you? Couldn't you use that as evidence to the Reddit overlords to show abuse of power?	/r/MensRights	14/05/17 09:17 PM
31	You're a dude. You're literally a man. I would not describe them as reasonable. I subbed there a while back in an attempt to hear both sides. Within a week I was banned, despite breaking no rules and citing everything controversial with a source. On top of this, any attempt to talk to the moderators just resulted in a 72 hour mute. And while I am just 1 data point, I've heard from a few others that this isn't an uncommon experience.	/r/MensRights	13/05/17 06:21 PM
2	Woman gets 7-year jail for false gangrape complaint The prosecution cannot be punished for failing to prove their case. You have to go beyond and prove malicious intent for the prosecution to be punished. This, to me, is /u/Nerdinater's point	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/05/17 07:55 PM
0	Woman gets 7-year jail for false gangrape complaint The upper caste men can get away with anything in India. Also, anyone with money.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/05/17 07:48 PM
2	Woman gets 7-year jail for false gangrape complaint India's a bit weird. On one hand, they're pretty seriously against rape, and will literally beat men to death who are just accused of being rapists. They overwhelmingly favour the victims, throwing "Innocent until proven guilty" to the wind. (Exception: Money) On the other hand, victim blaming is most certainly a thing, and while they would believe she was raped, the onus would also be on her. India is a really big place (7th largest globally) and has a lot of varying cultures, so making any gra…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/05/17 07:46 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob How many nations consider "forced envelopment" to be a form of rape? It doesn't get much more systemic than not even recognizing one group can be a victim. That said, the grander point isn't "We're the victims here" but rather "We can be victims too."	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 08:24 PM
2	Karen Straughan speaking for equality. No, because if you're showing me examples where "feminists" are not behaving like this then they aren't actually feminists. How do you differentiate this from the "No True Scotsman" fallacy? Additionally, the comparison between feminists and racists is a false equivocation. The former is a title, but the latter is a descriptor. If we have a group called "The Racists" who act to erase bigotry, we wouldn't call them racist. A change of the definition in the dictionary. I already mentioned this in …	/r/MensRights	01/05/17 04:14 PM
1	Karen Straughan speaking for equality. I don't think anyone contests the historical need for feminism. Often people defend feminism of the past, and I've no issue with that. It's the modern incarnation that we're troubled by. the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. You do realize that this definition leaves out the advocacy of men's rights, yea? Additionally, the dictionary is descriptive, not prescriptive. If people start using a word differently, it's not they who are wrong, but the dictionary. Tha…	/r/MensRights	01/05/17 04:03 PM
6	New feminist commercial declares 'equal pay is no longer enough' since 'being a woman costs more' Child support is to children what alimony is to your ex-spouse. In some usages (especially in the past) alimony was supposed to cover child support, but modern definitions treat them as separate.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/04/17 11:14 PM
73	New feminist commercial declares 'equal pay is no longer enough' since 'being a woman costs more' And child support.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/04/17 09:56 PM
11	New feminist commercial declares 'equal pay is no longer enough' since 'being a woman costs more' But then where do we draw the line? We can subsidize women's menstrual needs, and men's increased metabolism, sure, but what about people who are lactose intolerant, or have to order custom sized shoes (I narrowly avoided that one). I don't mean to sound absurd, but if we try to subsidize all of our differences, won't we just end up with an infinite list of things? My solution: Socialized healthcare for all the medical stuff, and the rest is up to the individual. Works well enough in most places…	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/04/17 09:14 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Women take home 77 cents on the dollar. And women earn less for the same job. It's absolutely a straw man to take the worst argument (that one obama tv ad) and say the entire wage gap is a myth because of it. That's a straw man again. The wage gap is largely due to discrimination, but not solely. It’s not a straw man if it’s an actual argument; some do argue that women make $0.77 for the same work, or that the wage gap is just due to discrimination. But if that’s not your argument, I’ll gladly n…	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/04/17 08:20 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Interestingly, your statement on negotiation appears to be circumstantial. This study found that framing the situation a certain way (using "ask" instead of "negotiate") made women more likely to negotiate than men, though as you suggested men do typically negotiate more than women. That study isn't perfect, by the way, but it does suggest something interesting, which is sufficient for this discussion.	/r/PussyPassDenied	17/04/17 02:13 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Lol no. Menstruation sucks AND a lot of women are crippled by the pain and the effects of it, which often means lower productivity. Oversimplification, I realize. My sister gets really bad cramps as well, and I'm glad her boss is a woman as well so she's really understanding. But you know, fair enough. Menstruation does have a bearing on one's wages. I'm not sure that this is something the employer should be obligated to compensate for, but it certainly plays a role. Maternity leaves, in several…	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/04/17 04:36 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap It sounds to me like you're saying "It's dishonest because it implies that women earn 23% less solely due to discrimination and no other reason, which is not true". But no one is saying that. That's a straw man. People literally say "Women (are) paid 77 cents on the dollar for doing the same work as men" (That's from Obama's campaign ad, by the way). It's not a strawman when people are literally using that quote to say women are paid 23% less for the same work. The gap doesn't get smaller if you…	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/04/17 04:06 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap While women certainly have things to deal with, most of those things either don't have a bearing on one's wage, or have a negative effect on it. For example, menstruation sucks, and maternal leave means that one has spent less time with a company and thus a comparable colleague would have 1 year more experience than them. In terms of what burdens men have that women don't, men are disproportionately more likely to work in more physically laborious jobs, have a higher rate of workplace injuries/f…	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/04/17 03:49 PM
1	Talk shit get hit. That's kind of the sort of thing I was going for in my original comment, but judging by how it was voted, people seemed to disagree. Or I communicated it poorly. Either or.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/04/17 03:44 PM
2	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Like I said, I get discussion fatigue. I usually deal with it by leaving an open tab until it's several weeks old and too awkward to respond now. I'm glad we can agree that the $0.77 factoid is mythical, and Obama really screwed us all there. It's like the 1-in-5 myth; 1-in-40 is still too high! I'd say the biggest remaining for pay equity are as follows: - How do we balance negotiations? - What do we do about?	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 09:50 PM
2	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Say hi to your husband for me! (or don't, that might be weird for you) What's unfair is that it sounds like you've decided what's right. I'm just trying to figure it out, but it seems like you've given up and said "You either agree or you haven't learned enough." To extend an olive branch: I know it can suck to be a woman. Your political representation is awful, just, like all of reproduction sucks, and society has yet to shake it's archaic views of what people ought to be, women in particular. …	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 08:44 PM
2	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Is Bob just doing extra chores, or is he also doing most of the child-care and all of the elder care for Alice's Mom who has early on-set Alzheimer's? For sake of argument, in this discussion "chores" refers to unpaid housework, so yes. Are Bob and Alice's working days the same length, or does Bob go from 9-5 straight to "Mom/Dad til midnight" (with a couple of extra hours put in for kids/confused parents waking in the small hours). They both work 9-5, but Alice has taken on overtime. They divid…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 07:12 PM
1	Talk shit get hit. To use an extreme example, suppose someone is yelling in your face about how they're going to pull their switchblade and gut you like a pig. Would that be enough grounds to use violence if you felt truly afraid for your life? If the answer is yes, the necessary consequence is that the judge and jury have to look at the whole picture before making a decision. If the answer is no, well that's terrifying. instead you could just call the cops and attempt to get them for harassment and legally have a…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 05:16 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap to make it seem as though she is being equally compensated in the work force. Never said she was equally compensated, or that she was compensated in the workforce. Those are not my arguments. just because rich people get millions a month in child support does not make the rest of women in the world equal. averages mean nothing. I don't even understand where you're going with this. I'm not talking about the rich or the divorced/separated. What I'm saying is that in a household, there is a certain…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 05:12 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap We're saying it's NOT TRUE and implying so is insanely sexist. Actually madfrogurt was arguing that this appeals to male superiority, where in fact it's trying to give a legitimate explanation for the wage gap (whether or not you agree with the explanation is irrelevant to this point). That you have some underlying assumption that men always do more work/work harder/smarter etc. Not always, just statistically. I know plenty of women who are smarter, stronger, and harder-working than I. That said…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 05:08 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap I know I'll probably get downvoted here because everyone seems to want to talk shit about how awful they think women are Don't worry, if I downvote you it won't be because I think women are awful. My sister is my favorite person in the world. That doesn't bear relevance here. Women DO make 77% as much as men on average. That's undisputed. The argument against the wage gap is that "it is caused by differences such a job position, hours worked, education, and experience". First of all, that's a li…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 05:00 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Well, the first link uses median annual income, the second doesn't even compensate for job types, and the third is just as bad. I'd ask you find a source that compensates for job field, hours worked, internal experience, and salary negotiation. Because none of the ones you've provided compensate for these fairly basic point.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:54 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Actually, empirical evidence shows that the more factors you compensate for (such as the ones on the horse's back) the wage gap shrinks to the point where single childless women outearn their male counterparts. The wage gap has been repeatedly debunked. Hell, even feminists like Hoff-Sommers agree.	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:47 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap The disadvantages women face are not financially compensated. Not directly, but they are. Allow me to elaborate. Take two individuals. Alice and Bob. Alice and Bob are single and live alone, which means they have to do their work, come home, and then maintain their home. That's just life. A few years later they get together, and shortly move in together. It doesn't matter that Alice makes more than Bob, they just want to be together. They continue to split housework. It turns out that Alice need…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:42 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap It's an exaggeration to make it seem like women have no burdens, but the point is that from the perspective of wages, men are getting the short end of the stick and thus it makes sense that they be compensated for it. Women are generally responsible for childcare and eldercare. That is not their employer's responsibility to compensate for. The other jobs you've listen where they're more risky, those hardly have a wage gap at all (things like time worked and negotiating salary comes into play). O…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:28 PM
3	Talk shit get hit. The argument I'm trying to make is that if the other person instigates the aggression (eg. via "fighting words") and then a brawl ensues, the judge would still consider those words to be relevant to the case. It may not absolve guilt, but isn't it relevant? so when they fight back and you get fucked you can't go complaining since pretty much every judge is gona tell you to fuck off I don't see how my losing this hypothetical fight has any bearing on this. And yea, I'm not even contesting that. I…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:39 AM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap either they are compensated or they are not They are not compensated by their employer, but they are (indirectly) by their spouse. I expand on that below. they aren't getting paid in blowjobs so why are you splitting hairs. Why are you being hostile? and how is it somehow a guarantee that they have access to their spouse's finances? where is this magical contract? This is generally how things work. When you buy a home together, for example, you look at what you can afford together, even if the e…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:33 AM
0	Talk shit get hit. I just did a couple of edits, so check that. Generally speaking you're not supposed to respond to words with violence. I get that. But like you said, in the right circumstance (like what you described; basically anything that would constitute "fighting words") it seems like this would be something that is relevant. It might not absolve you of guilt, but there's certainly a difference between punching someone because you don't like their words, and punching them because they were trying to incite…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:12 AM
2	Talk shit get hit. What if it's determined if the other person was using "threatening, abusive or insulting words"? What about "fighting words" in the legal sense, which is at least relevant enough to get it's own term?	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 04:07 AM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap if they were compensated for it then the statistics would show it. I do not mean that they are compensated in the sense that their work pays for it. I mean that they are compensated in the sense that they have access to their spouse's finances, thus they benefit from any additional income that their spouse generates (eg. overtime). It's not direct compensation, but it's compensation nonetheless. frankly you are wrong That is your subjective opinion. if the choice is made by society that housewif…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 03:58 AM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap I pretty much agree with all of that, as I was just playing Devil's advocate. If the players want lowered nets, and the audience would respond better to it, nothing else matters. There is one thing that stuck out to me though: Basketball isn't military, and even if it is, making the same standards for both is just a way of perpetuating a disadvantage for women anyway. With things like the military or firefighting, standards are set for a reason. Yes, they perpetuate a disadvantage for women, but…	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 03:56 AM
–	Talk shit get hit. Isn't there also a law regarding aggravation though? If the other guy verbally harassed me to the point where I punch him, that's factored into the sentencing, right?	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/04/17 01:41 AM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap I think a lot of the pushback (from what I've been seeing) is that for such a long time women have been asking not to be coddled, and this feels a bit like coddling them. It's like when people say "Anything a man can do, a woman can do" but then they turned around and lowered the standards for women in the Navy. I get that it's not literally the same people, but my point is I just think the resistance is against perceived hypocrisy, not not pointless bitching.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 09:28 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap The thing is, this isn't a job. This is a spectacle. We're talking about making things as entertaining as possible, and especially in women's sports, that's definitely needed. Don't get me wrong. If there was a mixed league, I wouldn't want women's points to count as double to compensate or anything like that. But by putting women in their own league, we've already recognized that they're (generally) just not as good. So why not lower the basket?	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 09:26 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Okay, last time I swear. So after you posted the video /u/k-otic14 responded by saying unpaid work should have no bearing on one's wage. After all, if you're not doing something for your employer, why should they pay you for it? Your response (correct me if I'm wrong) was that it's unfair because women tend to do more housework and receive no compensation for it. I have 2 responses to this. The first is that women are compensated for it, as they have access to the finances of the other individua…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 09:20 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Hi, me again. I'm still reading through this discussion (God help me). The point that /u/k-otic14 seems to be making is that in a discussion, you can't just hand someone resources. You still have to make an argument. If access to information was sufficient to end ignorance, the world wouldn't suck this much. Take, for instance, FGM. If I was arguing against it, I wouldn't just give someone a biology textbook and say "Read this and you'll understand." Instead, I would explain how it can cause sev…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 09:11 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap of course looking at the data differently will make the gap change, it is still unable to swing it in favor of women unless you really cherry pick the facts Actually, when you look at young, single, childless women, it appears they make more than their male counterparts. No cherry-picking necessary. I lazily got you the first reference I could find, but this isn't some obscure study, and a quick search should demonstrate that. Source: Time Magazine	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 09:02 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap Because we're not equal in all regards. Men are stronger. Women, more limber. If we're putting men and women in the same league, they should have to meet the same criteria (eg. workforce, navy, etc.) but for separate, gender-specific leagues, why not have more appropriate standards.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 07:29 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap I'm not sure why you feel the need to pain men in this fashion, but from the guys I know, few would have any strong feelings on this at all.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 07:19 PM
2	Woah The sun can be brutal though, huh? I'm brown too so I'm supposed to be better equipped for that sort of thing, but I swear 5 minutes in the sun in Canada can be unbearable; I can't imagine walking around in a desert in a t-shirt and shorts. They weren't really avoiding it, yes, but they were doing it for what I assume was meant to be comedic effect, like how comedians will joke about not being able to joke about Islam.	/r/MensRights	13/04/17 05:38 PM
1	Woah To an extent, I disagree. Fighting the weak arguments can be a useful tactic. Especially when debates are in an open forum (when they're done for the sake of onlookers) this allows us to easily frame the discussion to push a particular point. It would be fallacious to make them out to be the normal attitude, but you can springboard off them to make grander points (which doesn't work as well with the "brightest"). Another point (which I've heard from YouTubers) is that the critique you've raised …	/r/MensRights	13/04/17 04:22 PM
1	Woah Along the same lines: Don't get bedsheets with a really high threadcount. They don't breath well which can be bad for your skin, especially if you already have dermal issues (eg. acne). Something like cotton or silk is ideal. Also, change your pillowcase at least once a week. They're gross.	/r/MensRights	13/04/17 04:14 PM
3	Woah It's sort of like when people ask "Don't you feel hot wearing a turban?" Turbans come from the hotter parts of the world; it's not like people would walk about the desert wearing them if it made things worse. Also, in their defence, they were sort of trying to avoid referencing Islam directly, so it makes sense that they wouldn't say "Hijab" or "Niqab" outright.	/r/MensRights	13/04/17 04:11 PM
1	Whale gets triggered over human kissing at restaurant, gets sent back to Pacific Ocean Don't be ridiculous. We can feel superior without all of that!	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/04/17 03:36 AM
2	Whale gets triggered over human kissing at restaurant, gets sent back to Pacific Ocean To me it sounded more like being pooped out by a giant. I realize this doesn't make much sense, but this is the internet after all.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/04/17 03:32 AM
1	Politifact says It's MOSTLY FALSE - "Women (are) paid 77 cents on the dollar for doing the same work as men." - So why do so many demand it's 100% true? Preaching to the choir, bud. I would like to raise one point while I'm here. Negotiation is an interesting subject when it comes to gender disparity because the process does indeed favour men. Not only do they possess the traits that make them do better (eg. risk-taking tendencies) but they aren't viewed in a negative light for being more assertive, unlike women. Do you think this is the sort of gender disparity that we should accept (like strength) or is this something that we should be working…	/r/MensRights	01/04/17 04:57 PM
1	Politifact says It's MOSTLY FALSE - "Women (are) paid 77 cents on the dollar for doing the same work as men." - So why do so many demand it's 100% true? Point 1 is valid assuming the $0.77 statistic, even if there are laws against it. The point is, if employers can get away with paying certain employees less, why wouldn't they hire more if those employees? The obvious answer is that the premise is broken; that they can't just pay someone less for no reason.	/r/MensRights	30/03/17 01:01 PM
2	Race Myths When you say races it means organisms that can reproduce. While 'race' is sometimes used to mean 'species,' in most contexts (such as this) it's clear that it means 'subspecies.' Also, it's interesting to note that though the definition you've provided above (The ability to produce fertile offspring) generally works, biology is actually quite a bit messier than that. You do have cases of groups within a species that cannot (see ring species) or 2 separate species that can.	/r/PussyPass	07/03/17 09:57 PM
3	Apply shit to burnt area My first words were "[I'm] not justifying it." My point was this is what happens on the internet. If you say something inflammatory, you have no control of the potential uproar. This is something lacking in current education, but it's a truth about the present world. It's unfortunate, but that's how it is.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 08:04 PM
1	MRA Demands I don't think anonymity is the same as state secrecy though. It would still all be on public record, and journalists could still report on it; they'd just be prevented from releasing names until an appropriate time (eg. a verdict is released). Also, even if it were state secrecy, I'm not sure I understand how they would abuse that. If they wanted to convict someone in secrecy, they wouldn't need to make the accused anonymous to do so.	/r/MensRights	04/03/17 04:08 PM
7	Apply shit to burnt area I should list my height as 5' 14". That way it'll rule out the superficial and the ignorant.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 03:05 PM
16	Apply shit to burnt area Not justifying it, but she should have been prepared for this. This is the internet, and this regularly happens, especially when you're putting out tweets like that. I'm not happy that it happened, but I'm not surprised. Also, I don't think it was sarcastic. It was a joke, but enough people hold that opinion that I'd believe it was genuine.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/03/17 03:03 PM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust did you not know that? once again, mainstream historical narratives say this. the fact that you think it's shocking or weird says it all really. I was not claiming that you're wrong. I'm trying to figure out where your description of history breaks from the mainstream. We agree that the Madagascar Plan was created and failed. What happened next? Where do your accounts fork off? sorry, i'm confused, if you think he didn't want to mass deport them, and that the gas chambers weren't built to kill p…	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 09:11 PM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust i'd actually argue that what hitler tried to do would count as genocide, in that sending all european jews to madagascar or palestine would end their existence as a people. Is that your viewpoint? That Hitler's goal was a mass export of the Jewish people? what i'm saying is that the gas chambers were not built to gas people. So we agree on the purpose of said chambers? as it stands, whites are committing ethnic suicide globally over this. What does this even mean? i see hitler as a man who tried…	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 04:52 PM
4	Announcement : Pussy Pass Expansion While third-wave feminism does carry over from its predecessors, that means it inherits its problems. Not only this, but in its evolution it creates problems of its own, and my issue is that these problems are not addressed. It's due to feminism that women are presumed the default caregiver, and that men are presumed the aggressor in domestic abuse. Feminists have repeatedly argued on the wage gap and discrimination against women in their education/careers to the point where the opposite is taki…	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 04:39 PM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust I am not stating that an authority is the arbiter of truth. I am stating that inevitably an authority will have to make a decision. The alternative is that a list of sources is never created because the authority can't decide which sources to put on there, as that would require deciding which sources can be put upon the list.	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 04:16 PM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust even if you don't believe that, most people do. the allies were the good guys who saved the world from the evil nazis who were bad bad bad. germany, open up your borders, you don't want to be nazis! arrest that 80 year old he's a nazi! he's defending himself? holocaust denial! Okay, so save those arguments for those people. In the meanwhile, don't ask me to defend the position of others. and you can't have an arbitrary cutoff point for evidence. It's not a cut-off for evidence, it's a cut-off fo…	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 05:36 AM
2	Announcement : Pussy Pass Expansion saying feminism has accomplished nothing is historically illiterate at best. That's not what I said. I just feel that in practice, the movement does more harm than good that's just objectively incorrect. Apologies, I misspoke. My primary issue is with third-wave feminism, not with feminism as a whole. (Which I'm sure you could have guessed) without feminism... women wouldn't be able to vote Just an FYI, but women had the right to vote before feminism. Voting was attributed to land ownership, thu…	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 05:31 AM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust I appreciate an attempt at correcting the more aggressive attitudes; I'm all for the diversity of ideas (even when I'm opposed to them) but incendiary discussions get us nowhere. I look forward to seeing that collection of sources. In the meantime I'll try to take a look at that book sometime soon (hopefully it won't be another one that forever sits on my list of Books to Read).	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 05:04 AM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust now, you cannot prove a negative, all you can do is show something else happened, or problems with the official story. Fair enough, poor phrasing on my part. What I meant to say was that you've yet presented insufficient justification for denying the established position (i.e. that Hitler did not commit a genocide). the current paradigm still makes no sense, since the communists killed more people, and the allies had horrific war crimes as well. In other words "If Hitler is considered to be evil…	/r/PussyPass	03/03/17 04:59 AM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust the idea that a germany wasn't just evil is not an absurd claim. As I've said repeatedly, I don't believe that good or evil apply to Germany, Nazis, or Hitler. They're subjective terms, thus meaningless here. the fact that the allies committed atrocities is not an absurd claim. No one claims they haven't. and what do you mean by "truly credible"? Interesting you'd point that out; I was debating simply saying "There'll never be a consensus on what 'credible resources' would be," but I realized th…	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 11:03 PM
3	Announcement : Pussy Pass Expansion Edit: The final sentence should have read "the movement currently does more harm than good," but my writing was unclear. I'm glad to see that some feminists do make an effort to help both genders (not that I would ever deny this). That being said, I'd argue that as a movement they've done more to harm men than to help them. A classic example of this is Duluth model, which paints men to be the assumed aggressor. Don't take my opposition to feminism to be an opposition to all of it's goals or to i…	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 11:00 PM
9	Announcement : Pussy Pass Expansion If we're playing the dictionary game, feminism fights for women's rights to reach equality, and egalitarianism fights for everyone's rights to reach equality. Considering there are inequalities men face, doesn't this mean feminism is only a half measure on the course for equality?	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 09:38 PM
1	Announcement : Pussy Pass Expansion I would disagree with you there. While I agree with the dictionary definition of feminism, I don't agree with how this has manifested. I don't approve of many of the mainstream feminist beliefs, and I am against many of the products of feminism. Egalitarianism, on the other hand, shares a very similar dictionary definition. It had 2 benefits though. The first is that it focuses on the inequality of both genders rather than just women, and the second is that it doesn't come with feminism's baggag…	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 09:37 PM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust But when you begin to look at the memes and the claims being said by everyone else in the world, you start to piece together a different story than the official narrative. In some cases I'm sure that's true, but it's not sufficient to present a claim and put the burden onto the other person to prove/disprove it. I've had far too many people make absurd claims and either throw a textbook at me, or tell me to look it up myself. If you don't have the ability to present evidence or an argument, one …	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 09:21 PM
1	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust If one puts forth A = B, I don't need to demonstrate A = C to prove that A != B. That's all I'm saying here. I'm not trying to prove my position (which I have yet to formally declare), I'm just showing the holes in your logic. Wanting to address my position is a fair request, but you're not asking me to present/defend my position. You're saying that I can't scrutinize yours until I defend mine. And that is broken logic.	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 09:08 PM
6	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust When did I claim a bias? I don't suggest that their being Christian is proof. I state that disapproving of their argument is not synonymous with believing the opposite. The same is true of our discussion here. Edit: missed the not; makes a huge difference in my meaning.	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 05:37 PM
4	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust As an atheist, when I talk to a theist and I said "I don't believe in that," they always ask "How do you know there's no God?" You are that theist right now. I'm not trying to prove the opposite of you. I'm simply demonstrating that your position is at best insufficient, and at worst, false. I'm not alarmed because I have sufficient knowledge to find your position unsubstantiated. I'm open to being proven false, but your saying "If you only educate yourself" is not going to take this conversatio…	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 05:32 PM
8	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust at least I made an argument My intent was not to make an argument. It was to discuss yours. If the only merit of your position is "there is no opposing position" then that speaks volumes. my reason for not providing sources is I just don't have the time Fair enough, but most people also don't have the time to look it up themselves. Case in point, I'm sitting in a doctor's office killing time right now. By not providing citations, you lose credibility along with your audience. he was not just a b…	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 05:15 PM
10	reconsidering hitler and the holocaust I consider your arguments insufficient to dispute the fact that Hilter committed a genocide. This is the biggest factor in regards to his "evil," and you address it only in passing. And without citations, mind you; you simply deflect with "Well you could easily look it up, so why should I provide it?" Good and evil are arbitrary concepts. Hitler was not "pure evil," he was just a guy who did things we consider to be detrimental to society. Had he won, he'd have been a Saint. Morality is subjecti…	/r/PussyPass	02/03/17 04:35 PM
1	MRA Demands hundreds of baby boys die from the procedure every year I need proof of this. A quick search found this study which found 117. Disclaimer: This was literally the first link I found, and the 117 is an estimate (though they do explain how they came to this number). there is no correlation between childhood sex and any negative outcomes in adulthood. To be clear, OP was referring to sexual abuse, thus the claim is that there's a correlation between childhood sexual abuse and negative outcomes in ad…	/r/MensRights	02/03/17 04:37 AM
1	MRA Demands Interestingly, the one example of your ambivalence is one of the points I agreed most strongly with. The only problem I had with it was that it was too narrow; no one's name should be released when they are accused of a crime. It seems like common decency to me.	/r/MensRights	02/03/17 04:04 AM
16	The Truth About Diversity I really hope I'm just getting trolled hard, because this is ridiculous. Whiteness is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and heteropatriarchal capitalism. Eliminate whiteness and you eliminate every single form of oppression that the world currently faces. Forgot about ISIS I guess. When I teach my students about... Wait, this woman teaches‽ my white students often ask me how they can “atone” for the evils of whiteness and how they can make up for cent…	/r/PussyPass	25/02/17 01:35 AM
1	Male disposability in action: woman slashes bouncer's face with a broken glass, walks free with no jail time He would get a higher sentence than she would have (even if she got an appropriate sentencing).	/r/MensRights	18/02/17 07:07 PM
1	Girl wants an 'open relationship' so she can fuck random guys on holiday - Complains when her boyfriend cuckqueans her x-post from r/cringeanarchy As I've said (thrice now) if they can't trust their fidelity, why are they testing it? They should change or cancel their trip. And if they're not willing to do that, we know where their priorities lie.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/17 07:05 PM
1	Girl wants an 'open relationship' so she can fuck random guys on holiday - Complains when her boyfriend cuckqueans her x-post from r/cringeanarchy I do appreciate that, but the correct response to that situation is not a contingency plan; if you can't control yourself, you shouldn't be going on this trip.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/17 07:02 PM
1	Girl wants an 'open relationship' so she can fuck random guys on holiday - Complains when her boyfriend cuckqueans her x-post from r/cringeanarchy I'm not a party person You're already a friend in my books. I will applaud her for being self aware... Many people wouldn't even think of that until the morning after the deed. Agreed. she cares enough about this relationship to not want to cheat and hurt the boyfriend, but don't trust herself enough to be able to resist temptation. If she can't resist the temptation, she shouldn't be going on the trip. But that means you have to be able to be alright with your fella landing some That's what fru…	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/17 06:59 PM
1	Male disposability in action: woman slashes bouncer's face with a broken glass, walks free with no jail time they could have been dangerous. But they were not... Police and the courts look at what happened, not what could have happened. I disagree. There's a reason we have laws for attempted murder or intent to cause grievous bodily harm, or why we charge people for reckless driving. It's not just what has happened, but what could have happened. chicks dig scars. We're not talking about what "chicks dig." We're talking about him.	/r/MensRights	18/02/17 06:30 PM
2	Girl wants an 'open relationship' so she can fuck random guys on holiday - Complains when her boyfriend cuckqueans her x-post from r/cringeanarchy All words are made up.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/17 05:10 AM
41	Girl wants an 'open relationship' so she can fuck random guys on holiday - Complains when her boyfriend cuckqueans her x-post from r/cringeanarchy It frustrates me that she knows he's been resisting 'the girl from work,' but when it comes to controlling herself, she needed a contingency plan. Even if we grant her all the liberties I can think of, at the end of it she didn't think she could be expected to control herself, and she didn't think that her boyfriend would be able to take advantage of an open relationship. I can't even pretend to muster up sympathy. (I realize I started venting half-way though the comment. My bad)	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/17 05:07 AM
1	Male disposability in action: woman slashes bouncer's face with a broken glass, walks free with no jail time The cuts he suffered were between the eye and the "danger triangle;" they could easily have caused serious damage. The fact that her actions didn't lead to incarceration is more concerning than you make it out to be. As for his self-image, I'm not at all surprised. I have a scar on my nose from being struck with a wire, and even though no one can see it but me I still find it troubling. This guy's scars are clearly visible, so in no way do I find any of it laughable.	/r/MensRights	18/02/17 04:52 AM
2	Male disposability in action: woman slashes bouncer's face with a broken glass, walks free with no jail time Premeditated attacks generally carry higher sentences. I know that wasn't what you were alluding to, but still.	/r/MensRights	18/02/17 04:45 AM
2	Male disposability in action: woman slashes bouncer's face with a broken glass, walks free with no jail time The third woman recovered remarkably well. Props to the medical team who managed that feat. I definitely agree though; what this woman did was egregious, but it's not comparable to throwing acid. It wasn't premeditated, and it wasn't remotely as severe.	/r/MensRights	18/02/17 04:44 AM
1	"A total of 914 people died of a drug overdose in B.C. last year. Of that, 176 were women" Boo fucking hoo! What about the other 738 that happen to be men? Absolutely backwards. Perhaps it's because I myself am not great with words, but I've always felt it's the meaning behind them that really matters. Yes, the "what about the ___" format should be avoided, but the message was clear. Saying a particular phrasing undermines credibility is itself counterproductive. I will say I was not fond of the "Boo Fucking Hoo" comment, but that's just me.	/r/MensRights	15/02/17 04:57 AM
3	"A total of 914 people died of a drug overdose in B.C. last year. Of that, 176 were women" Boo fucking hoo! What about the other 738 that happen to be men? Absolutely backwards. I've briefly read through a few of the discussions you've had with others but I thought I'd throw in my own comment. You may not like this type of argument, but that doesn't make it a bad one. It's abuse gives it a bad reputation, however it can be useful, particularly when a particular subject isn't addressed. In this situation the argument is useful. For no good reason, the CBC chose to highlight 19% of victims for no other reason than their gender. In light of this, it makes sense to ask "Why…	/r/MensRights	15/02/17 04:31 AM
1	Mum who tried to kill newborn baby by dumping him in hospital bin walks free from court Any reason you suppose the infant's gender was relevant?	/r/PussyPass	15/02/17 01:36 AM
9	Comedian Bill Burr talks about his favorite video of the year which happens to be an all time great pussypassdenied For all intents and purposes, having a drink thrown in one's face is assault and incurs the same emotions. In principle, any response is "unnecessary and excessive use of force," but given the nature of the trigger I'd say this was better than a solid punch.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/02/17 08:18 PM
1	If a man deliberately hit a woman with a car and pinned her against a fence he'd be charged with attempted murder You're right, "intent to cause grievous harm" is different from "attempted murder." But the act of intentionally hitting someone with a car is closer to the latter than the former. Of course, obligatory 'I'm not a cop/lawyer/etc.,' but it'd be hard to argue she only meant to hurt him.	/r/MensRights	02/01/17 03:42 AM
13	If a man deliberately hit a woman with a car and pinned her against a fence he'd be charged with attempted murder "Intent to cause grievous bodily harm" shows they think she did it intentionally, and the fact that they used the term grievous coupled with the use of the car pretty clearly implies murderous intent, at least to me.	/r/MensRights	27/12/16 08:43 PM
1	Female teacher found guilty of two counts of luring a minor, one count of sexual exploitation and one count of touching for a sexual purpose against male students. Receives house arrest. Perhaps I could frame my position better. When we talk about individual cases, you are entirely correct. It is within the judge's discretion as to what should happen. But when there is a trend among certain populations; for men to be punished significantly harsher, or rather, for women to get off easier; there needs to be intervention to prevent these sorts of inequalities. Apply the same argument to race. In individual cases it's fine if a certain white man is punished less severely than a cert…	/r/MensRights	22/12/16 06:54 PM
1	Female teacher found guilty of two counts of luring a minor, one count of sexual exploitation and one count of touching for a sexual purpose against male students. Receives house arrest. Contextually I'd argue they were advocating for the universal application of the law rather than claiming that the law is absolute. After all, by its nature the law is flexible, so that'd be an absurd position. As per the second last statement, the problem is that this law would not be applied to a man in the same scenario. Either the law is applied evenly, or not at all.	/r/MensRights	16/12/16 05:55 AM
13	Ex-fat woman steals £95,000 from employer: Suspended sentence because she mainly gave the money away to "good causes" and she has a child. Merry Christmas! I disagree. Even if she did what she claimed (and she should definitely have to prove herself) that is not the kind of behavior we should be encouraging. Do you realize how many people would start donating to charity just to fund criminal hobbies?	/r/PussyPass	16/12/16 01:44 AM
2	Interesting It depends on where she lives then, doesn't it? Perhaps she's Canadian, or maybe Australian (I believe they don't have any either). And even if she was wrong about that 0 figure, the main point is that there is a huge accessibility issue for battered men that no one seems to be addressing.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 08:05 PM
5	Interesting As far as I know Canada has literally zero. I think it'd be fair to say overall there's statistically no shelters; hardly dishonest to me.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:27 PM
3	Interesting To me, labels create divides. Often the discussion about the label can grow such that the issues they re present are never reached. You seem quite reasonable so I'd expect you to believe something similar. If that's the case, why should we defend labels at all? Shouldn't MRAs and feminists shed their titles and instead speak directly about the issues that matter?	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 03:22 PM
19	Canadian Theatre cancels showing of men's rights documentary The Red Pill due to complaints As an additional point, I'd say I applaud and encourage those who act on that definition. It's not enough to claim to be for women if your actions are against men (see IPV).	/r/MensRights	02/12/16 06:53 PM
1	But don't tell your daughters anything because girls are already perfect and only boys do bad things I think they were just adding to your point and not disagreeing with it. While that may have resulted in a general muddiness, it may not have been their intent. But alas, I don't know. Not worth arguing over.	/r/MensRights	29/11/16 08:02 PM
1	But don't tell your daughters anything because girls are already perfect and only boys do bad things Though I do have some issues with more traditional feminism, I agree that what's left of it is far worse. I think I misinterpreted your comment to mean that the 'bad' feminists of today aren't 'real feminists.' If you were just saying that 3rd wave feminism is bad, I think we're on the same page.	/r/MensRights	29/11/16 05:22 PM
2	But don't tell your daughters anything because girls are already perfect and only boys do bad things Gotta agree with /u/itty_bitty_beaver. That's flagrant and unabashed NTS right there. By what authority do we determine what is "true feminism?" What if the majority of feminists behave a certain way? What then? Cherry-picking the good parts of the movement isn't fair .	/r/MensRights	29/11/16 04:39 PM
1	Woman thinks she can avoid ticket control because she's "attractive" Best case scenario	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/11/16 11:19 PM
11	London Zoo withdraws sexist “all men are paedophiles” policy after campaign I'm not (just) taking another jab at Catholics, but isn't that just priests? Seriously though, it's pretty terrible that a man can't be left alone with a girl, but women around boys it completely fine. I'm just happy that they conceded their error.	/r/MensRights	17/11/16 05:43 PM
20	London Zoo withdraws sexist “all men are paedophiles” policy after campaign I know you're joking, but the cost of being presumed to have pedophilic tendencies is too high for me. That said, I'd gladly pay extra to be places several rows away from any infants. How are those things not yet banned from planes?	/r/MensRights	17/11/16 05:41 PM
7	Two years ago today....never forget the slap of justice Is it racist if they're specifying "belligerent black women"? What if they are actually themselves, but just find their belligerence to be particularly annoying? Much like that thing where people clap to emphasize every word they say, there are certain behaviors that are particularly annoying that can be associated more strongly with a certain racial community. I don't think it's racist to point that out. Of course, I've also been called racist because I've said a disproportionate number of Musl…	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/11/16 10:13 PM
2	"Don't you dare reprimand me! I'm a woman with rights!" a) Godwin's Law. b) It's not the only point against Clinton, but c) it's one that keeps being mentioned because she (unquestionably) broke the law and no one cares. She is above the law. d) No one addresses the scandal sufficiently, so like all other issues, it keeps coming up. But no matter who wins, we all lose.	/r/PussyPass	03/11/16 11:33 PM
2	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor People are looking to him to validate their idea that it's not fucked up to call a trans woman a man, or a trans man a woman. He is defending free speech. Of course that attracts some terrible ideas, but that doesn't mean it's not worth defending. If he is in line with calling people by their preferred sex, and he tells people like the commenter we were talking about that they're assholes, then that's cool, maybe he's not so bad. The problem (and the reason I engaged you) is because of the demon…	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 06:29 PM
4	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor As does Blair White. People keep treating Peterson as if he's transphobic, but if that were the case why would any transsexuals side with him at all? It's almost as if he's not a bigot at all!	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 04:27 PM
2	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor He's likely a troll and no one's engaging with him (if they're even seeing him; wasn't exactly at the top of the thread). But If you've already made up your mind, no use in a discussion.	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 04:23 PM
1	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor I totally understand. It's true everywhere; certain words (more so nigger than fag here) can get you attacked. It's absurd, but an unfortunate reality.	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 04:22 PM
3	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor Instead of watching /u/craftychap's video, watch the one it's based on (as it recommended; see here). At the least, watch the bits where Peterson is allowed to defend his own position. He has no issue calling transsexuals 'he' or 'she' (as they prefer). It's the inorganic language changes being enforced and backed with fines and jail time that are a problem. Perhaps I've seen more of the situation than most, but it seems ridiculous that people treat him as a transphobe, or that you would suggest…	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 04:15 PM
2	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor It's also worth noting that Peterson addresses transsexuals as they'd like, so long as it's 'he' or 'she,' not 'singular they' or 'xir' or one of the stranger alternatives. The line is that which defines the aim to insult. I think this line is quite important. Unlike most people, I'm perfectly fine with saying nigger or whatever "w...e" was supposed to be (whore?). It's the context that matters. Saying the word "nigger" or talking about it is fine. Calling someone a nigger is a problem.	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 04:02 PM
3	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor hopefully your comment here gets upvoted so that it gives me all the incentive i need to understand that this subreddit condones bigotry. Despite what appears to be your desire* to be victimized, few share this position on the sub (and in reality). Look at all of the comments here and tell me how many comments like this get upvoted at all. i wish there was a place for people like me that support common decency and don't disrespect LGBT or minorities Who is disrespecting the LGBT? We don't need t…	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 03:59 PM
2	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor he's a bigot who thinks trans people are 'absurd'. Frankly, your use of the term bigot is devaluing it. Like racist or sexist, I'm slowly learning to just brush it off because of things like this. If you can quote Peterson as saying something bigoted, please do so, but he does not have something against trans people. Just pulling from the Steve Paikin discussion, he said that he wasn't addressing transsexual individuals (here) and he has no issues addressing transsexuals as 'he' or 'she' (here).…	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 03:35 PM
9	SJW'S glue Jordan Petersons office door shut preventing him seeing patients, imagine if an MRA had done this to a feminist professor You're not wrong, but I've never seen those pronouns used in a context where the gender of the person is known. The way people are asking to use they/them/their is, to my understanding, unprecedented.	/r/MensRights	03/11/16 02:38 PM
3	Video of woman punching man outside 7-Eleven goes viral \| And it's prompted a discussion about female-on-male violence, with a majority of comments agreeing it's a serious and under-recognised problem From memory, the average intelligence of the genders is the same. It's the distribution that varies. Men have a wider distribution, so they occupy more of the lowest 1%, but also more of the highest 1%.	/r/MensRights	01/11/16 03:58 PM
6	Video of woman punching man outside 7-Eleven goes viral \| And it's prompted a discussion about female-on-male violence, with a majority of comments agreeing it's a serious and under-recognised problem If you were ounces in the face by anyone, you should call the police. Especially when the other person thinks they can just get away with it. I'm not sure if you went through with it, but if not you (unfortunately) just reinforced her belief that she can do as she'd like.	/r/MensRights	01/11/16 03:54 PM
1	Video of woman punching man outside 7-Eleven goes viral \| And it's prompted a discussion about female-on-male violence, with a majority of comments agreeing it's a serious and under-recognised problem As weird as that felt, I kinda have to empathize with the guy. How do you react when a woman is punching the back of your head? You can't say anything, you can't do anything, and it's hard to stay calm. Trying to play it off was likely his way of staying in control.	/r/MensRights	01/11/16 03:48 PM
5	Girls decide they don't want to pay cabbie because he wouldn't let them smoke, accuse him of sexual assault instead. Cabbie has it all on camera. Cops let the girls off because reasons. That's pretty horrible, man. That 1 in 4 statistic has been debunked way too many times! Seriously though, that's probably not a good thought to be having. Might be wise to take a break from the more negative subs you frequent.	/r/PussyPass	28/10/16 07:21 PM
-2	Girls decide they don't want to pay cabbie because he wouldn't let them smoke, accuse him of sexual assault instead. Cabbie has it all on camera. Cops let the girls off because reasons. To be fair, they didn't try to ruin his life. They were trying to get a free ride. It's highly probable that that would have been the consequence, but that does not seem to have been their intent. Not that it makes their actions any better. It's just a different kind of bad.	/r/PussyPass	28/10/16 07:19 PM
2	Equal rights Equal lefts I think she'd have a better time making that argument had she not gone for the crotch/abdomen kick. Slapping is one thing but kicking raises the violence.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/10/16 04:58 AM
1	high school boy brutally punches female classmate the girl just kept fighting him That's why I threw in the "Maybe he waited a while for the first strike"; there does seem to be some hesitation because of her gender, but I think overall the point stands.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/16 04:21 PM
1	high school boy brutally punches female classmate the girl just kept fighting him For attacking him when he was trying to say away, and if she hit him while he wasn't looking, she'd be as wrong as he is. That doesn't justify his actions in the slightest. It just makes them both bad people.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/16 04:19 PM
0	high school boy brutally punches female classmate the girl just kept fighting him Lovely. Have a wonderful day.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/16 04:18 PM
8	German model fined 24,000 Euro for false rape accusation I agree. This will disincentivize fake victims, which will reduce their numbers therefore make us all that much less doubtful when someone claims to be raped. Most people here would love to see a world where 100% of rape accusations are true. But until then, we need to punish the false ones.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/16 02:36 PM
9	high school boy brutally punches female classmate the girl just kept fighting him On one hand, I can hardly applaud this boy. He used more force than necessary, and went after her when she turned away. Not admirable. On the other hand, good on him for treating her like he would any other person. Maybe he waited a while for the first strike, sure, but he didn't seem to hold back much just because she's a female. If that's not gender equality I don't know what is.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/10/16 01:47 AM
6	Audio technician denies Yoko Ono the chance to steal the spotlight by cutting her mic. Yeah, but using words you don't know the meaning of because they sound insulting does nothing to move you or the subject forward. Nor does using insults. I agree entirely. Imagine calling a jewish guy a chink Wouldn't the parallel be "Calling a chinese guy a Jew?" Because that happens frequently. That would bring two responses: people would think you're a racist moron or racist morons would agree and now there would be more people in a group promoting the destruction of our language. No one gain…	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/10/16 07:59 PM
7	Audio technician denies Yoko Ono the chance to steal the spotlight by cutting her mic. When's the last time you heard the term "bitch" actually refer to a pregnant dog? It turns out insults don't need to be accurate, so long as they reference something that's agreed upon to be insulting. Now, whether or not being a fuck is a bad thing is a separate matter. Much like being gay, I say to each their own.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/10/16 04:11 PM
2	Equal rights Equal lefts Hypothetically I could kill someone if they're trying to hurt me. Raising the level of violence isn't inherently a bad thing. Especially when one is attacked, excessive force is bad, but if they're doing what's needed to stop the violence and stop beyond that they are fine. I don't know whether his body slam was necessary, but if I was in that scenario I doubt I'd be able to figure it out in a split second. I do know that he didn't instigate the violence though, and he stayed away once he was no…	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/10/16 03:49 PM
2	Denied by Russell Crowe! Don't know if it's a PPD but it was a terrible thing to do on Azalea's part. She deserves everything that comes from this. On a side note does anyone know who this is? I thought it might be Iggy or someone but I've literally never heard of them.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/10/16 01:12 AM
2	TIL the first female carrier-based fighter pilot in the U.S. Navy died just months after she was certified for combat because instructors overlooked her poor performance in training so they could beat the Air Force to having the first female fighter pilot. Operative being "necessarily." I agree that it's not precise (many people don't enter the comments) but it's the best/only indicator we've got. You generalized everyone who upvoted ("Then there are folks like OP and the people upvoting this post") and I showed why it's reasonable to think maybe that's not what's happening. That's all.	/r/PussyPassDenied	17/10/16 01:45 AM
2	TIL the first female carrier-based fighter pilot in the U.S. Navy died just months after she was certified for combat because instructors overlooked her poor performance in training so they could beat the Air Force to having the first female fighter pilot. If you check the top 5 comments, you'll find that people are blaming the Navy/Air Force for what happened, not the pilot. The guys who are commenting things like "Stupid cunt" (PisslamicState) are getting downvoted. If you still believe that the people upvoting this are just "bitter shut-in neckbeard douchebags" then you go right ahead.	/r/PussyPassDenied	16/10/16 11:01 PM
2	Feminist Clementine Ford thinks her online abuse of a severely Autistic man was totally justified. Oh, and it's all the fault of men, of course you could argue that AVfM is only a small contingent of the MRM and that their views aren't representative of the movement as a whole I meant that suggesting Patton's views aren't within the scope of the MRM is sort of NTS-like, not AVfM's. I'm sorry that was unclear and that you wrote out that message; know that I did read through it. I agree that AVfM does have a strong presence on the MRM as a whole, and with that first chunk of your statement. All that said, when you look at the actions and …	/r/MensRights	15/10/16 02:14 AM
2	Feminist Clementine Ford thinks her online abuse of a severely Autistic man was totally justified. Oh, and it's all the fault of men, of course Does that not approach the No True Scotsman? Who's to say Patton's opinions aren't shared by the movement overall, or that they won't one day become the opinions of the group? And who would be in charge of enforcing what is or is not derailing the narrative?	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 08:27 PM
2	Feminist Clementine Ford thinks her online abuse of a severely Autistic man was totally justified. Oh, and it's all the fault of men, of course My point was that banning dissent is bad. I don't care who does it; the feminists, the SJWs, AVfM or the MRM; it's a poor tactic and should not be encouraged, in my opinion. And I'm not sure what was your intent, but you didn't make an argument for it.	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 04:19 PM
2	"Rape is only rape for women then..." "Basically" The term 'beta male' is used as a comparison to 'alpha male.' Considered a mirror, the beta male is all that an alpha is not; weak, timid, intelligent (but in the nerdy sense). That's loosely the definition, though often it's just a generic insult (like 'cuck'). As is often the case, Urban Dictionary is your friend. I'd avoid comparisons to the biological terms; in biology, betas are second in command, but in the social definitions, betas are more antithetical to alphas.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/10/16 04:50 AM
1	"Toronto cafe charges women more than men for coffee" Fair enough. When you said "I call bullshit on the insurance though" it seemed as though there were parts of it that you didn't call bullshit on. But far be it from me to put words in others' mouths.	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 03:30 AM
2	Girl completely steamrolls feminist with logic Any pay discrepancy due to gender discrimination is absolutely despicable, and anyone who is proven to be violating the equal pay act should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. That said, it is agreed by most if not all economists that the vast majority of the "pay gap" is attributed to choices (just as you said), and that if sexism is at play here, it only amounts to a couple of cents at best. A couple of cents too much, to be fair, but that's all. It's all about equality of opportunit…	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 03:27 AM
1	Girl completely steamrolls feminist with logic Okay, so it wasn't just me who found her infuriating. From her ignoring points (even when they agreed with her) to the fact that she'd insist she was not to be interrupted, but would then interrupt Andrews, I just got more and more angry listening to her speak. And then she would just insist that the stats being cited were wrong just because they disagree with her position. The fact that she was put up against someone who seemed so lovely just made me even sadder.	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 03:22 AM
4	"Toronto cafe charges women more than men for coffee" Are you speaking in defence of the pink tax? Because if so, I have words. With haircuts, it has to do with many factors. Complexity, fashion, longevity (men can go longer between cuts), and peer pressure all play into it. Most things I've read on the supposed "pink tax" go against it, and usually come down to "Women are choosing the more expensive choice."	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 02:41 AM
8	Nice to see some things are changing! A lot of what I see here is frustrating and depressing, but it's pretty great to see something like this. It's great to see these guys looking out for all victims, and they definitely deserve all the attention they're getting.	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 02:30 AM
4	Nice to see some things are changing! I felt that was odd as well. "People" is more concise and just works better.	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 02:28 AM
10	Feminist Clementine Ford thinks her online abuse of a severely Autistic man was totally justified. Oh, and it's all the fault of men, of course I don't know about banning him (isn't that what we critique the 'other side' for doing?) but I agree with the sentiment. Conduct definitely matters, and all of the people parroting the "land-whale" insult are undermining the community.	/r/MensRights	13/10/16 01:57 AM
3	"Rape is only rape for women then..." "Basically" Just guessing, but a beta male who orbits around women.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/10/16 01:44 AM
1	Soho Pharmacy is now charging 7% Man Tax x/post from /r/nyc It's a matter of principal principle (whoops). It's the debate behind whether the ends justify the means; consequentialism versus deontology. We don't have to agree on the matter, but I'd rather not resort to hypocrisy and then justify it with "Well they did it first." If the fight is worthy, I'll find a way to win without such tactics.	/r/MensRights	11/10/16 11:18 PM
5	Bitch can't stand it when fed her own medicine It's still shitty, it's just not hypocritical.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/10/16 06:33 PM
1	Soho Pharmacy is now charging 7% Man Tax x/post from /r/nyc The channel is inviting comments. Making our voice heard is important and an effective form of activism, though of course things should be kept civil and accurate. That's a fair point, though I would be concerned as to how "civil and accurate" things would remain. Definitely leave comments if you feel they're wrong (which they are), but maybe don't tank their ratings just because of this. Sending (potentially) thousands of people at their YouTube and Yelp page is significant enough to not be tak…	/r/MensRights	11/10/16 04:07 PM
0	Soho Pharmacy is now charging 7% Man Tax x/post from /r/nyc I'm not suggesting that we ignore it because the other side uses it, but that we ignore it despite the fact that they do. To use your boxing analogy, it's more like saying "I'm going to fight fair even if the other guy fights dirty."	/r/MensRights	11/10/16 04:02 PM
1	Soho Pharmacy is now charging 7% Man Tax x/post from /r/nyc You're paying for the item, but that's an assembly line product. Baking depends on the skill of the baker.	/r/MensRights	11/10/16 04:01 PM
1	Soho Pharmacy is now charging 7% Man Tax x/post from /r/nyc Never, though I don't see your point.	/r/MensRights	11/10/16 04:00 PM
–	Soho Pharmacy is now charging 7% Man Tax x/post from /r/nyc I don't want to send a brigade their way. Isn't that what we would critique the "other side" for doing? If it's a store you've used or it's approach appropriate to rate it a certain way, go for it, but let's not go out of our way to try to downvote this to oblivion. Edit: Kimble makes a fair point; comment and make your voice heard, there's no problem with that. My main issue is with mob voting.	/r/MensRights	10/10/16 11:23 PM
2	Soho Pharmacy is now charging 7% Man Tax x/post from /r/nyc I guess that depends on whether it's the cake as an item, or the service of baking the cake that is in question. I don't actually know where it stands.	/r/MensRights	10/10/16 11:20 PM
1	Lesbians given day release despite unspeakable cruelty and murder of baby boys. Not like this I haven't. I would also just hope that these women weren't motivated by bigotry, and I'm not certain that this was.	/r/MensRights	01/10/16 11:45 PM
2	Lesbians given day release despite unspeakable cruelty and murder of baby boys. Without question. What I don't understand is that they adopted these children, so how did they manage to get past the background checks? Something went wrong here that must be corrected.	/r/MensRights	01/10/16 10:04 PM
–	Lesbians given day release despite unspeakable cruelty and murder of baby boys. Possibly; I've heard of enough people having that mentality. That said, I wasn't able to find anything of this on these individuals, and Hanlon's razor seemed applicable.	/r/MensRights	01/10/16 07:38 PM
20	Lesbians given day release despite unspeakable cruelty and murder of baby boys. I think most people would despise these women.	/r/MensRights	01/10/16 06:18 PM
11	Lesbians given day release despite unspeakable cruelty and murder of baby boys. Speculative or confirmed? Edit: they could be horrible but not sexist, or they could be both.	/r/MensRights	01/10/16 06:15 PM
1	Mary P. Koss thinks that it is "inappropriate" to consider men who have been raped by women as rape victims, because "their penetration experience is not similar to what women are reporting". She calls it "unwanted contact". it's a question of somebody is brigading this sub and the admins won't go after them This is sort of what I meant; it's the moderator's responsibility to deal with this, ie. an issue of moderation. It definitely sucks that they're not doing anything about it, but frankly I'm happy they're not as trigger happy as some subs. I've been banned from places I haven't even visited.	/r/MensRights	30/09/16 02:04 AM
2	Freshmen walk out of sexual consent talk at York University. With the exception of blackout drunk individuals, that's bullshit. Of course, I'm sure they were well aware of that when they wrote that passage. Also, that passage suggests that if two people drink and have sex together, they are both raping and are raped by each other. Yea, that seems reasonable.	/r/MensRights	29/09/16 01:42 PM
1	Mary P. Koss thinks that it is "inappropriate" to consider men who have been raped by women as rape victims, because "their penetration experience is not similar to what women are reporting". She calls it "unwanted contact". If that's the case (and again, I don't frequent this sub enough so I'll take your word for it), this is an issue for moderation. Perhaps they should be more strict, or perhaps they should make it easier for users to report reposting themselves.	/r/MensRights	29/09/16 01:30 PM
2	Freshmen walk out of sexual consent talk at York University. Did the linked crisis centre website support their claim, or was it a false citation? It's strange to see so many claiming to be the arbiters of truth without knowing what they're talking about or even applying rudimentary logic. What if both parties have drank?	/r/MensRights	28/09/16 06:49 AM
3	Mary P. Koss thinks that it is "inappropriate" to consider men who have been raped by women as rape victims, because "their penetration experience is not similar to what women are reporting". She calls it "unwanted contact". As a non-scientist it disgusts me too.	/r/MensRights	28/09/16 03:35 AM
3	Mary P. Koss thinks that it is "inappropriate" to consider men who have been raped by women as rape victims, because "their penetration experience is not similar to what women are reporting". She calls it "unwanted contact". Is there a good solution for it? As a casual browser, I'm not going to check if something is a repost or if an account is a bot. Isn't this more of an issue with moderation rather than the community?	/r/MensRights	28/09/16 03:31 AM
4	Mary P. Koss thinks that it is "inappropriate" to consider men who have been raped by women as rape victims, because "their penetration experience is not similar to what women are reporting". She calls it "unwanted contact". To be fair, technically she's trying to say is that penetration is rape, but made to penetrate is not. Of course, that opens the floodgate to numerous arguments that I'm sure she is not willing to accept, so in essence, she is trying to say that women can't be offenders.	/r/MensRights	28/09/16 03:28 AM
1	Woman admits to making false rape claim: apparently trying to ruin a man's life is a misdemeanor in New Holland . But this is always the case, even with statute limitations. Plaintiffs always have this edge. I can tell you what I did last weekend. I can't tell you what I did September 23rd, 25 years ago. The longer that period becomes, the more biased it is against the defence. Also, this is part of the reason why the statute of limitations exists, so continuing this point is to say it shouldn't exist at all. Doing something that helps the accuser always hurts the defendant and vice versa. Fairness is about…	/r/MensRights	23/09/16 11:11 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! As long as the man has the full information, what he chooses to do with it is up to him. If raising a child of your own blood isn't a top priority to someone, so be it. And if they want nothing to do with that child anymore, then that's fine too.	/r/MensRights	22/09/16 01:36 AM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! It's unfair to label it as "unearned enrichment" if it was not her intention, and it was going towards the child. For argument's sake, assume both of them thought the child was theirs. They would both be putting money towards the child willfully and gladly. Then, they find out that it's not the father's. To eliminate her being the bad guy, say she'd been raped and doesn't know by whom. Now, should she have to reimburse the man? They were both willingly putting money into this "investment," and t…	/r/MensRights	22/09/16 01:29 AM
3	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations Your post feels ironic when a "what did one person ruin for everyone" post on the front page full of stories where all it takes is one asshole to impose changes in policy. I didn't even catch that, but that's a pretty funny coincidence. I mean, I really don't want any more disincentives to reporting actual rapes Here's the thing though - it really doesn't. You have to prove that the person was intentionally deceitful, and that's much more difficult than most people realize. As /u/doobey179 said,…	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/09/16 03:56 AM
3	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations It seems more just than Trial by Combat though, doesn't it? Well since I've got you, this river business was Trial by Ordeal; if evidence was insufficient, the accused was put through a potentially lethal situation, and it was believed that the gods would decide their faith.So basically Trial by Combat, except you can't hire The Mountain to fight your battles for you.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/09/16 03:50 AM
1	Woman admits to making false rape claim: apparently trying to ruin a man's life is a misdemeanor in New Holland . I've been trying pretty hard to just step away from the conversations that aren't as productive. I didn't think I was doing too well, but I feel like I've had quite a few really good talks lately, so the sites been doing me good. Speedy trial - You might be right on that, but I was just throwing that out there. You're probably right on that. (b) - You said it before I had to; the system often requires the defendant to prove innocence. But I think this is even more in cases like these. Suppose fo…	/r/MensRights	20/09/16 03:45 AM
1	Woman admits to making false rape claim: apparently trying to ruin a man's life is a misdemeanor in New Holland . 1) I'm pretty sure it violates the right to a speedy trial (or something of the sort; I'm obviously not a lawyer). Anyways, the purpose of the statute of limitations is to protect the defendants for 3 reasons: a) A plaintiff with a valid cause of action should pursue it with reasonable diligence. b) A defendant might have lost evidence to disprove a stale claim. c) A long-dormant claim has more cruelty than justice. Now I grant that (a) is not applicable in this discussion, but (b) and (c) certa…	/r/MensRights	20/09/16 01:53 AM
1	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations No worries, I didn't take it too harshly. I did want to post the reference though, so I'm glad you gave me a reminder.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/09/16 01:44 AM
1	Woman admits to making false rape claim: apparently trying to ruin a man's life is a misdemeanor in New Holland . As I said, I wasn't trying to diminish your argument by comparison. I'm just saying, in the same way that that argument strives to help victims but ends up unfair to the accused, that is how I view your position. The metaphor was not meant to go beyond that. I appreciate that trauma is more than just emotion. We're in agreement on that. The thing about precedent is that with it, your argument has a strong basis, but without it, you have to make a stronger basis for yourself.	/r/MensRights	20/09/16 12:10 AM
5	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations She's not being charged for a false rape accusation though. She's being charged with "Providing a False Report to Law Enforcement." In other words, she's not getting charged for trying to ruin someone's life, but rather for wasting the law's resources. I just want an explicit law targeting people trying to ruin other people's lives. Just its presence would satisfy me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/16 11:59 PM
4	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations Generally speaking, you're correct that an increased punishment wouldn't work well as a deterrent. I believe I've read a few articles suggesting this. The difference is that the current system basically tells women that there is no consequence to making a false claim. Even in this case above, there was no problem with her accusing some of rape (which puts him in jail for roughly a decade). By putting in some consequence at all, it's saying "We actually care if you abuse the system." That's diffe…	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/16 11:38 PM
4	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations Dang it, you've caught me. It was just laziness. I was at the doctor's office, and research on a phone is painful. I'll linked the actual article now though, in case anyone else stumbles by.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/16 11:21 PM
3	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations That's the most important part if you ask me, otherwise you're falling down a bit of slanderous accusations. And thank you.	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/16 11:19 PM
1	Woman admits to making false rape claim: apparently trying to ruin a man's life is a misdemeanor in New Holland . The thing is your argument is unprecedented. When else has something like this been granted because of the emotional burden? The unfortunate thing is that the system isn't always perfect. Sometimes the victims don't get justice, and the perpetrators walk away scot-free. But defying the statutes of limitations for this isn't appropriate if you ask me. Not to diminish your argument by comparison, but your argument is akin to saying "We should make rape cases guilty until proven innocent." It would…	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 11:16 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! I don't even disagree that the government just wants to shift the burden of finances. But what I've been saying is that they shouldn't be, and instead they should just put it on the woman. Except that they want to keep their jobs. And if they're going to lose their job for suggesting women be responsible for themselves, we should fight for them as well The government is not going to pay unless there are no other options... and there are.... 2 in fact, the actual father and the duped guy. And in …	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 11:11 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! I feel like it's sort of unfair though, because the maternity package isn't really a "female" thing so much as a "parent" thing. A single dad would have just as much use for it (minus a breast pump, I suppose). Meanwhile, the paternity test is little more than peace of mind and a deterrent/safety check for fraud. That said, the general idea of giving a couple $X to spend where and how they see fit seems like a good idea overall. No reason not to have it, or not to expand on it.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 10:57 PM
44	Woman uses the standard "I was sexually assaulted" line and gets pinched for false accusations Isn't that written in the Code of Hammurabi? I can't check it myself but I believe the punishment for reporting a false crime is the same as the punishment for said crime. It should be made clear that this only applies if the claim is proven to be an intentional lie (as opposed to just not getting a conviction) but I can assure you, if there were serious consequences for trying to ruin a life, it wouldn't happen as often. Edit: Here is a translation of the Code of Hammurabi. It's noteworthy that…	/r/PussyPassDenied	19/09/16 08:59 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! I didn't find it relevant because I was talking about what should happen. You were taking the approach of what would happen. I've no issue with saying the system is broken. There's no reason they can't make her pay, and if she ends up being unable to pay, she's going to file for welfare and she'll get the money anyways. That should be where the line is drawn, and as I was talking about the ideal situation, that would be that.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 07:36 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! Yes yes, the government operates as a business and cuts costs wherever it can. That's not really the point of all of this.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 06:42 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! Is that currently what happens in Finland, or just how you're modelling it? Either way, it seems like a good idea. I don't see why you'd have to justify it, but I can see how the public would react better to your solution.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 06:31 PM
2	Woman admits to making false rape claim: apparently trying to ruin a man's life is a misdemeanor in New Holland . I don't know if "It's hard to get over" is a good enough argument. Looking at all other exceptions, they only take place if the crime is considered significant enough. Crimes against humanity, for instance, has no statute of limitations. Furthermore, the statute of limitations has a further benefit - it encourages people to come forwards sooner. The longer you wait to come forwards with a rape claim, the less likely it is to result in a conviction. Encouraging people to take as long as they need…	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 05:39 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! Always gets me. And thanks, I didn't even realize!	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 04:57 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! Doesn't the government already give single mothers support in raising their children? This would just be an extension of that. And if the man was deceived, he should be removed from the picture. In all likelihood, the true father didn't even know about this child, so he should be safe as well. I feel like you removed the most obvious solution: The woman should be held responsible. Why shouldn't she be expected to raise the child herself?	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 04:56 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! /u/Meistermalkav wisely said that the test should only take place if the man chooses fatherhood. I think that it should be the government who pays for this. It should be a regular procedure, not a special occurrence. I would hope that this sort of thing reduces lying about paternity, but there will always be bad people.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 04:53 PM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! "fatherhood tests foras low as 50 bucks are doable." As I've said, if the laws were passed the price would drop. "The question is, do you want to?" A lot of people would. And I think they should have that right. Personally, I don't even want kids, but I'm still young. "Congrats, you have run the risk of a false positive." All tests run the risk, but that's not an argument against running them. Just disclose the information and offer a retest. Lifted from Wikipedia (I'm lazy): In a DNA parentage …	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 04:50 PM
1	"I'm a big, strapping bloke. Who would believe I was a victim of domestic abuse?" If you've ever learned about sensitivity and specificity, this sounds quite similar. The unfortunate truth is that no system is perfect. It's horrible to hear of people like your sister, who were denied justice, but the response cannot be to install a biased system in its place. As for your final point, I don't know that it's designed to help people abusing the system. Not to diminish your position, but I'd be weary that it's not shaped by personal experience. In my opinion, it seems like the sy…	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:58 PM
3	Woman admits to making false rape claim: apparently trying to ruin a man's life is a misdemeanor in New Holland . While I agree with your sentiment, I don't see how eliminating the statutes of limitations would help with that. Should someone be charged with raping someone 40 years ago? Why should rape be the exception to the rule? I don't know how long the victim has to proceed with the charges, but I would think it's long enough that extending/eliminating the statute would be justified.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:38 PM
1	Since when should a drunken women claimimg rape EVER BE TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY THAN SEXUAL OFFENCES AGAINST INNOCENT CHILDREN? I found the source: Daily Mail archive.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:23 AM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! Now that you've pointed that out, I feel foolish.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:12 AM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! I did a quick search that suggested they can run up to $500, and while you probably don't need to use the most expensive test, it would be a big burden for the government to spend on every single child. If a reasonably good and cheap test exists, I have no complaints.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:10 AM
2	"I'm a big, strapping bloke. Who would believe I was a victim of domestic abuse?" A lot of people underestimate how seriously society takes violence against women. If you are being abused by a woman and you shove her away from you, that's already grounds for a case. Trying "An eye for an eye" will get you some serious jail-time. What I found particularly interesting is this line: people underestimate how powerful a woman can be when she uses the system for evil. We often talk about the different kinds of abuse; physical, emotional, financial; but the fact is women can use the…	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:09 AM
1	Number of wives and girlfriends convicted of assaulting partners reaches new high In no way do I condone what this man's wife did to him, but I don't think the best advice here is to say "Go to the police." First of all, the police are often not sympathetic to the situation, which would be even more disheartening, and the second is that when it has to do with one's spouse, they are much less likely to go to the police. On my part, I was wrong though. He should find someone sympathetic to them regardless of if it's the 1st time or 51st.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 03:03 AM
1	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! If the woman can be shown to have willfully deceived the man, she should be responsible for repaying him, otherwise they just cut their loses. Unless the biological father somehow caused this mess (how would that even happen), this is either the woman's onus, or no ones. Women aren't weak or powerless. They can take care of themselves and a child. No reason to coddle them by passing off their burdens.	/r/MensRights	19/09/16 02:59 AM
1	/rtwoxchromosomes comparable to this sub? That's a fair point, though I don't know to what extent. But I would say that defaulted subs tend to become worse off, so as I said, I'd rather neither of them have default status.	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 09:26 PM
6	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! Why should the deceived be forced to pay? At what fault is he? If he is not the biological father, he should be free from responsibility, and the woman should be tasked with (a) determining the true father, (b) supporting the child(ren) herself, or (c) have the government assist her. But the deceived should not be punished. I do have 1 minor issue with this though. If a man gets a woman pregnant without his knowledge, and she proceeds to term with it, why should he be responsible? That's just an…	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 09:25 PM
5	/rtwoxchromosomes comparable to this sub? I don't know if they're comparable. Does MensRights ban dissent? The thing is, twoxchromosomes has 70 times more subscribers than this sub. Expecting them to get the same treatment is not reasonable to me. I'd rather neither of them have default status (and my understanding is that twox would like the same) but that doesn't seem to be an option.	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 07:32 PM
5	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! At this point the cost of these tests is quite high (for ones of higher precision) but any legislation that mandates it (such as what /u/SporkTornado suggested) would drive the price down, and hopefully then mandatory tests would be easy to do.	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 07:28 PM
2	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! I don't understand the point you're making. The article is clear in saying that this does occur, and the estimate they give (4% or 1/25) is already quite high. The rest of the article is pretty terrible though.	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 07:27 PM
6	" 'Legislative slut-shaming': How the German 'Cuckoo Kids' Law' punishes women" - You serious about this?! Exactly how many children grow up believing the wrong man is their biological father is difficult to determine, but a 2005 review of studies found the rate was about 4 per cent, or roughly 1 in 25 children. That's terrifying, and considering these women were cheating at the least, and lying about the child's parentage at worst, it's absolutely disgusting. the German Justice Minster sought cabinet approval for a bill that would force women to divulge past sexual partners. I do disagree with this …	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 07:26 PM
5	"I'm a big, strapping bloke. Who would believe I was a victim of domestic abuse?" “When I tell people about what happened, some of them still ask: why would you, as a man, put up with that?" I hate to say it, but would anyone ask that of a woman? It's absolutely infuriating that someone could speak to a victim in such a way; they should be offering nothing but support.	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 07:01 PM
2	Number of wives and girlfriends convicted of assaulting partners reaches new high If that's a regular occurrence, you should talk to someone who's more sympathetic to your position. There's no excuse for that sort of behavior, and you should not tolerate it.	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 06:49 PM
1	A feminist's two sons reject her lies about rape culture etc and she's very pissed off about it: "My teen boys are blind to rape culture - The Washington Post" Precisely. As the outside observer we are impressed at what she is able to accomplish, but we despise her for it. I found that despite extending to the public was well, who was willing to condemn this man despite no evidence against him. Of course, that part's a reflection of reality, and that just makes me ashamed of our society.	/r/MensRights	18/09/16 02:46 AM
2	A feminist's two sons reject her lies about rape culture etc and she's very pissed off about it: "My teen boys are blind to rape culture - The Washington Post" I don't know about the book but in the movie she celebrated because they still see her as the victim and not the perpetrator. She gets away with everything, and no one but Ben Affleck's character knows anything.	/r/MensRights	17/09/16 04:38 PM
1	A feminist's two sons reject her lies about rape culture etc and she's very pissed off about it: "My teen boys are blind to rape culture - The Washington Post" I can't tell if you mean aboriginal or of the Indian subcontinent.	/r/MensRights	17/09/16 04:35 PM
0	17-Year-Old Faces Child Porn, Assault Charges for Consensual Sex with Girlfriend I think what they're suggesting is that the law should be applied evenly. Even if the law was a bad one, it should either apply to all, or to none. It's definitely wrong that this kid is being charged for something so stupid, but it'd be pretty horrible to think it's only happening because he's a male.	/r/MensRights	16/09/16 05:13 PM
2	Crazy woman attacks a guy for flying a drone on the beach. She tells the cops he assaulted her. She goes to jail because video doesn't lie. Noteworthy that his arrest was a separate event not tied to this one.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/16 07:15 PM
8	Crazy woman attacks a guy for flying a drone on the beach. She tells the cops he assaulted her. She goes to jail because video doesn't lie. The incident with child pornography on his phone was a separate matter not related to this. It's debatable as to whether it should quality as porn, but he did seem to entice minors, which is obviously wrong.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/16 07:14 PM
5	Crazy woman attacks a guy for flying a drone on the beach. She tells the cops he assaulted her. She goes to jail because video doesn't lie. Supposedly they were on his case from the moment he posted videos of weaponized drones, because they couldn't charge him with that, but they didn't like him. At least, that's what his attorney claims. I don't know enough to say more.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/16 07:13 PM
3	Crazy woman attacks a guy for flying a drone on the beach. She tells the cops he assaulted her. She goes to jail because video doesn't lie. To you and /u/sockmess, the defendant is 19 years old, and "the girls ranged in age from 11 to 16, according to the affidavit." It seems vague to me as to whether or not it's actually porn, though his other charges seem more legitimate.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/16 07:05 PM
16	Crazy woman attacks a guy for flying a drone on the beach. She tells the cops he assaulted her. She goes to jail because video doesn't lie. the girls ranged in age from 11 to 16, according to the affidavit. Some of his charges do seem legitimate and may deserve to stick, but the charge of pornography seems weak at best. They described it as follows: Austin Haughwout received, viewed and stored a video of a scantily clad 14-year-old girl "twerking" in front of a camera and exchanged sexually explicit text messages with her they "observed many photos of what appeared to be pre-pubescent females" in "various stages of undress and posed…	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/16 07:03 PM
11	Crazy woman attacks a guy for flying a drone on the beach. She tells the cops he assaulted her. She goes to jail because video doesn't lie. Should it count as "illegal possession of child pornography" if it's a video of twerking that she sent him? The other charges seem legitimate based on the stance his lawyer has taken, but are we really going to qualify twerking as porn?	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/16 06:59 PM
33	Crazy woman attacks a guy for flying a drone on the beach. She tells the cops he assaulted her. She goes to jail because video doesn't lie. The first article made him seem obviously guilty, but yours, not so much. That one seems to suggest enticement at best, and if the pornography was just "twerking," it's really not pornography at all. Nor is "various stages of undress" (necessarily). It doesn't seem like he's contesting that the items were on his phone with his knowledge, but it seems arguable as to whether or not he's actually done wrong. But having not seen the evidence, I can't say.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/09/16 06:57 PM
1	No more slapping - Why I stopped slapping my boyfriend in the face Honestly, I wouldn't even take that. If you insult someone, they can insult you back, but if they're raising a hand they should expect to get hit back.	/r/MensRights	15/09/16 12:22 AM
6	No more slapping - Why I stopped slapping my boyfriend in the face For me it's a reflex; if I'm struck I strike back, and I rarely have control over how hard. Ideally I'd hit them as hard as they hit me, but I find slapping to be more degrading, and that doesn't leave me with as much reserve.	/r/MensRights	14/09/16 10:56 PM
2	No more slapping - Why I stopped slapping my boyfriend in the face To be fair, he did start with "Can't watch it at work." Clearly they have no context here. That's a reasonable conclusion to draw from the title.	/r/MensRights	14/09/16 10:54 PM
23	13 year old boy files human rights complaint against B.C. government for providing HPV vaccine to girls but not boys Herd immunity isn't for the majority of people who are able to be vaccinated. It's for the minority of people who are not, and are thus at greater risk.	/r/MensRights	14/09/16 03:04 AM
0	Epic smackdown of the bs "you should always believe the woman who cries rape because it's a rape culture bla bla..." Now I'm even more confused. When I saw your last comment, I was at +4. Now I'm back down to 0. I'm so confused! Sorry for the misunderstanding though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/09/16 09:11 PM
2	Epic smackdown of the bs "you should always believe the woman who cries rape because it's a rape culture bla bla..." I was hoping to get a link for a specific study or something of the sort, because as I said, most things I've seen suggest 2-8%. That's a high number to me as well, but it's nowhere near 40%. If it's an accurate stat, it's something everyone should know. If it's inaccurate, I'd like to establish that before I commit it to memory. Edit: According to this study, while 5.9% of sexual assault cases were deemed false, only 35.3% were given sentencing. The rest (58.8%) cannot be labeled either way. Th…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/09/16 06:38 PM
0	Epic smackdown of the bs "you should always believe the woman who cries rape because it's a rape culture bla bla..." Why down vote for asking for a citation? Who said I downvoted? He even explained that the anecdote above could be for a related but less quantifiable number. They said "it was well established close to 40% of rape allegations were unfounded" and I just wanted to see who/what established that. I don't think it's an unreasonable request. And being able to explain something isn't sufficient; I was hoping to see evidence.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/09/16 06:34 PM
-3	Epic smackdown of the bs "you should always believe the woman who cries rape because it's a rape culture bla bla..." Where did you get 40% from? The more reasonable estimates I've seen tend to suggest 2-8% of allegations are false. Perhaps you're talking about an earlier point in the process (eg. before filing any charges) but without a citation I'm dubious.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/09/16 04:55 AM
3	You can't make this shit up, leaving my BF and still don't have access to his money. Didn't mean to accuse you of anything, I was just stating my position. I definitely agree on not vilifying anyone. People are too eager to exercise mob justice it seems.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/09/16 03:32 AM
1	You can't make this shit up, leaving my BF and still don't have access to his money. I've been managing one of his companies and I still have no access to the money after 6 years and it's still "his money". She's not clear, but it seems to be that she's talking about his money, not his company's. She said she has a place, and a job, and college lined up. Based (presumably) on her savings, rather than his accounts. The main points being discussed are her alleged abuse (which she mentions once and never again), and the finances (which most, myself included, see as her trying to ac…	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/09/16 12:30 AM
1	Playboy Playmate faces prison for selfie (haven't read the article; paywall) I think she's saying that posting it publicly was the accident, as it was meant to be private (to a friend). And seeing as this is SnapChat, that's fairly easy to do (from my understanding).	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 08:07 PM
2	Playboy Playmate faces prison for selfie Not that I would know, but your logic seems sound to me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 08:05 PM
2	Playboy Playmate faces prison for selfie Don't disagree with you, but the site won't let me read it. Paywall.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 08:00 PM
2	You can't make this shit up, leaving my BF and still don't have access to his money. I think she worded it poorly; that she was managing his company, and she's also been managing the company for 6 years. Everything else aside, even if I agree that she's not in a sound place right now (which seems like a reasonable assumption) that doesn't mean that her line of thinking is acceptable. Why should she think she deserves access to his accounts? That's the common critique here, and it's still a fair one. Edit: As for the PPD, I think that's just his refusal to let her access his mone…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 07:54 PM
2	You can't make this shit up, leaving my BF and still don't have access to his money. I don't know that this applies here though. She says she has money, she has been working (in what appears to be a decent position at the least, ie. not minimum wage), and she can take her stuff whenever she'd like. Also, I don't think it's that she can't spend funds without permission, but that she can't spend his funds. That's quite distinct. You're right, this could be much more complicated. But we can't assume it's more complicated because it could be. If we allow for that, we could make just…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 07:52 PM
1	You can't make this shit up, leaving my BF and still don't have access to his money. I don't know whether to upvote or downvote you. Your logic is perfect as to what's likely going on in her head, but as a mindset for someone to actually have, it's infuriating.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 07:50 PM
5	You can't make this shit up, leaving my BF and still don't have access to his money. I've been managing one of his companies and I still have no access to the money after 6 years and it's still "his money". I think she's trying to say that she's been managing one of the companies (for some period of time), and additionally, she has no access to his money despite being together for 6 years.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 07:45 PM
8	You can't make this shit up, leaving my BF and still don't have access to his money. For rape and abuse, I will support and trust the victim (at least at first), but if they accuse someone, I'm going to stick with innocent until proven guilty. I think a lot of people on the other side think assuming innocence means not believing the victim, when I'm just trying to get things straight. But you don't have to accuse someone to support a victim.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 07:44 PM
86	This woman is literally a psycho Part of me wishes people wouldn't do this. Not yellow; obviously that's deplorable, but the advertising that you've caught them and then post it on the internet. I fear we raise a smarter class of psycho, who still have the same objectives, but now know not to incriminate themselves. Of course, maybe I'm giving them too much credit.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/09/16 07:29 PM
1	Sarah Silverman admits she made up wage gap story even after she called out specific employer. I don't know about malware, but my my browser tried it's hardest not to let me get it.	/r/MensRights	07/09/16 04:26 PM
1	Sarah Silverman admits she made up wage gap story even after she called out specific employer. I don't know about malware, but my my browser tried it's hardest not to let me get it.	/r/MensRights	07/09/16 04:26 PM
3	Feminist gets challenged, can't find any answer so she resorts to name calling and insults I still use "wench," so there's that.	/r/MensRights	06/09/16 10:37 PM
6	Feminist gets challenged, can't find any answer so she resorts to name calling and insults Even if that's true, the first person is wrong and the second seems like they'd be horrible to be around.	/r/MensRights	06/09/16 10:37 PM
11	Feminist gets challenged, can't find any answer so she resorts to name calling and insults I don't know why I watched that. Now I'm just mad.	/r/MensRights	06/09/16 10:35 PM
1	Laws to protect men from paying child support for children that aren't theirs is now "slut shaming" and "punishing women" I thought I was banned from 2X but I guess not! I know I'm banned from OffMyChest and Feminism but Feminisms is still okay with me. For now, that is. At least you know why you were banned though. They would just block me when I asked why.	/r/MensRights	04/09/16 08:13 PM
1	Laws to protect men from paying child support for children that aren't theirs is now "slut shaming" and "punishing women" What I don't get is that a lot of the time, people will talk about how ridiculous some of those ideas are, but then say we should ban them. If they're that ridiculous, shouldn't people be able to discern that for themselves? And if they cannot, isn't that just a flaw of our education system? The only reason I hesitate to venture into TwoX and those like it is because I will inevitably get banned and then withdraw my subscription, thus pushing myself into an echochamber of my own creation.	/r/MensRights	03/09/16 04:34 PM
18	Laws to protect men from paying child support for children that aren't theirs is now "slut shaming" and "punishing women" For what it's worth, I had the same experience. The sad thing is that I just wanted to see a different viewpoint, but now I can't stand to give them my subscription. When feminism began, they were told that with more rights would come more responsibility, and they embraced this with open arms. You think that could happen now?	/r/MensRights	02/09/16 01:31 PM
0	University Of Chicago to incoming freshman: "We do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces” That's simply considerate, people act as though giving a "trigger warning" is a form of censorship Trigger warnings are silly, but they're not a real problem. Lastly, in my mind safe spaces are just a temporary refuge for people who may not feel comfortable and safe in the average public space. The issue is that people want to extend this too far. They want to barr certain kinds of speech within these safe spaces, and want them to extend ridiculously, sometimes for the entire university (remembe…	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/08/16 07:22 PM
6	Male teacher sentenced to almost 2 years in jail for sex with a girl who was over the age of consent. Around 4 times as long as a similar case of a female teacher who had sex with a male student UNDER the age of consent. I only spent the time thinking it over because I'm neurotic and socially awkward. I spend that much time thinking about how to say hello. I definitely agree with the sentiment though. As I said elsewhere, if you call a child 'cute' and the first thought that comes to someone's mind is paedophilic, they're the one with the problem, not you.	/r/MensRights	23/08/16 06:19 PM
4	Male teacher sentenced to almost 2 years in jail for sex with a girl who was over the age of consent. Around 4 times as long as a similar case of a female teacher who had sex with a male student UNDER the age of consent. "What's Star Wars". Cut to a picture of me about to burst with joy. We sit down, I put on the first movie (A New Hope) and they loved it. Relevant xkcd.	/r/MensRights	23/08/16 06:10 PM
7	Male teacher sentenced to almost 2 years in jail for sex with a girl who was over the age of consent. Around 4 times as long as a similar case of a female teacher who had sex with a male student UNDER the age of consent. Definitely. If you says they love children and their first thought is of pedophilia, they're the one with the problem, not you.	/r/MensRights	23/08/16 06:07 PM
2	Male teacher sentenced to almost 2 years in jail for sex with a girl who was over the age of consent. Around 4 times as long as a similar case of a female teacher who had sex with a male student UNDER the age of consent. I find that "beautiful" and "adorable" are 'safe' words. You can get away with anything if you say it right. I can't get the correct intonation though, so I stick with those and keep my pitch low, and it works well.	/r/MensRights	23/08/16 06:06 PM
1	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. Every time I've heard a story about a police officer shooting a civilian in the past year, the officer has been suspended at the least until investigation takes place. I feel like there's a disconnect between what I've experienced and what you're describing to me.	/r/MensRights	17/08/16 09:36 PM
1	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. Well first off, it's a huge stretch to connect what's happened here to a swat raid. Second, officers using excessive force and getting away with it is not commonplace. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but to act like that's the norm is extreme. Have you ever seen one of those videos where a streamer is swatted? Most of the time, the cops are just being extremely careful, and as soon as they realize it's safe, they go back to normal.	/r/MensRights	17/08/16 09:34 PM
1	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. But aren't they only given the authority to use that force when necessary? Police are not supposed to go any further than that, and are often punished when they do. Granted, when they are not, the department should then be punished for it, but I'm just questioning if they should be inherently responsible for the actions of an officer.	/r/MensRights	17/08/16 07:27 PM
1	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. If I do nothing to stop it, I am at fault. I agree completely. Going back to this scenario, the cop acted out of line. If the department were to reprimand him appropriately (fire him or whatever), should they still be held responsible?	/r/MensRights	17/08/16 07:06 PM
1	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. I do appreciate that you're actually explaining where you think I've erred, instead of just saying I'm wrong. But isn't your comparison false as well? No one pays the police to go and fight someone. They're trained to be able to fight if need be, but their job is the enforce the law, and while I'm not sure how it's worded, I'm pretty sure in the US they're supposed to use the minimal amount of force required. The only way I'd agree with your sentiment is if the act of hurting someone was positiv…	/r/MensRights	17/08/16 07:04 PM
-1	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. I don't quite know if I agree with that though. If I teach someone how to fight and then they go and beat people up, should I be blamed for the individual's actions? If you say no (as I would) then the same principle should transfer to the police department as well.	/r/MensRights	17/08/16 02:48 AM
10	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. From my understanding, what the car company has done is legal because the US legal system does not have a way to handle this correctly. The same goes for his place of residence. It just points to yet another hole in the legal system. To put it another way: From the company's perspective, he's just another guy who hasn't paid his fees for months. They don't know about his being in jail, and the court is under no obligation to tell the company to cut him some slack.	/r/MensRights	16/08/16 10:02 PM
7	Man Refuses to Allow a Homeless Woman to Stay with Him; Loses his Job, his Car, and nearly his Home Because of a Clearly False DV Allegation. I'm not familiar with US law, but can the department get sued for the actions of one individual? Unless they were previously aware of their instability but did not act on it, why is the entire department to blame? As for the individual, I completely agree. Flagrant abuse of power in such a position should not be excused, and such an individual does not deserve a second chance in that line of work.	/r/MensRights	16/08/16 09:56 PM
1	Woman kicks guy, proceeds to get knocked out /u/Abraxhas translated it over here, but basically the guy tried to hit on the girl and then she started calling him gay and an alcoholic, and you saw the rest. Again, credit to Abraxhas; give him the upvote.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/08/16 08:17 AM
3	Lindsay Lohan thinks she can just take her boyfriend's phone, gets denied (the media is calling this an assault) Should the NSA have access to everyone's personal information? If you're doing something illegal, you deserve to be caught, and if you're not, well what do you have to hide? The principle is the same.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/08/16 04:54 AM
4	Lindsay Lohan thinks she can just take her boyfriend's phone, gets denied (the media is calling this an assault) There's nothing on my phone that I'm hiding (that's not password protected) but if you take my phone I will grab you. It's about privacy, not guilt.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/08/16 10:33 PM
-2	Lindsay Lohan thinks she can just take her boyfriend's phone, gets denied (the media is calling this an assault) Looked to me like he twisted her arm a bit too, which would be painful. Still not assault though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/08/16 10:29 PM
-2	Lindsay Lohan thinks she can just take her boyfriend's phone, gets denied (the media is calling this an assault) I don't know, the arm twist can be quite damaging. I wasn't quite clear on how hard he twisted though.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/08/16 10:27 PM
0	Ex GF drunkenly told my best friend she was going to accuse me of rape. Pass Denied Instantly. Based on all the things I've read on the internet, it seems like the response to anything serious is "see your lawyer." Things vary so much by state, country, or even case by case, so if it's serious you shouldn't take the risk. it seems like when anything legal comes up, your first action should be "see your lawyer." Things can vary state by state, country by country, or case by case, so if it's serious enough, you really shouldn't risk it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/07/16 03:19 AM
2	Ex GF drunkenly told my best friend she was going to accuse me of rape. Pass Denied Instantly. The denial was her thinking she could get away with it and having it fly in her face. Jail time would be ideal, but there were definitely consequences for her actions, and honestly, at this point any consequence is a good outcome.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/07/16 03:15 AM
2	Ex GF drunkenly told my best friend she was going to accuse me of rape. Pass Denied Instantly. Nothing wrong with what you said, but those women either need to be upfront about their position, or they need to understand that they're wrong. Besides, OP indicated that she intended to dump him anyways, so I think she just didn't want to be the dumpee.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/07/16 03:14 AM
34	Ex GF drunkenly told my best friend she was going to accuse me of rape. Pass Denied Instantly. To be clear (nothing against you bud) this is for people who are clearly lying, and not for anyone whose rape claims don't stick. There's a distinct difference between women who cannot prove they were raped and women who clearly falsified their claims. We're not deterring victims, only liars.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/07/16 03:08 AM
1	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! I did say gender-biases aside. Including them is why universities practice "Guilty until proven innocent." I'm talking about a legal basis. If we're talking purely from the perspective of the law.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/07/16 03:23 AM
0	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! Obviously they'll try, but I don't think they'd have a good case, gender biases aside. As I said, obviously it's smarter to call the police. I've long since left that realm.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/07/16 12:46 AM
1	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! But he's also on video saying she's at the hospital. And as long as he's naming the streets as he goes, and she's free to leave, I don't think it counts as kidnapping. Honestly, part of me is just hoping it's legal to do this. Obviously it's smarter to call the police, but obviously I'm not thinking about that.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/07/16 12:09 AM
-1	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! For all we know she's been asking him where she is for the past 40 minutes. As I've said, lacking context we can't say much. But people don't usually jump to the anger this man exhibited.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/07/16 11:46 PM
8	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! Is it kidnapping if the door is unlocked and your 'captive' is able to know their location and leave at any time at her own request? I get what you're saying, and it's probably not the smartest idea, but it'd be hard to make a case for kidnapping if you ask me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/07/16 11:42 PM
1	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! Considering the woman behind the camera missed all of the context, it's hard to say what's happening. He says that she's been a bad customer the entire time (she was late, she was rude, etc.) but more importantly, she was refusing to comply for quite some time. It doesn't excuse his yelling, but surely it explains it, and in context, her being calm is not an appropriate response.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/07/16 10:28 PM
3	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! Well fortunately for us, the videographer did a terrible job of capturing the situation, so we don't know what lead up to this. Perhaps he just suddenly started screaming until his vocal chords bled. Perhaps she was screaming right up until the point that she pressed play. Thanks to her, we'll never know.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/07/16 10:23 PM
4	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! As soon as the video started I was suspicious, because he was already mad, and she was being calm (albeit in a shitty way). I don't know if that's when she started recording or that's how she edited it, but I'm doubtful at best that this is an honest representation of the situation.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/07/16 10:21 PM
6	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! I was thinking something similar; just start driving further and further from her destination. Let her know where she is and that she can leave at any point, and just keep going. Eventually she'll leave, right?	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/07/16 10:18 PM
18	Hostile Uber driver refuses to take me to ER! He did mention that she was late to the pickup, rushed him despite being in no rush herself, and the fact that she had been rude the entire way. I too would like to see his side of things, but I think it's obvious that she was just a horrible customer, at least to him.	/r/PussyPassDenied	10/07/16 10:16 PM
1	The hard naked truth about "misogyny" On a sidenote, it seems that I have been unbanned over there. I'll have to see if it's just a shadowban or not.	/r/MensRights	10/07/16 12:55 AM
1	Girl gets taste of her own medicine.. Really funny It was funny to watch and all, but there was neither a pussy pass nor a denial, unless you could "Don't hit women" as the pass. Besides, she's like 6. Everyone's vexing when they're young.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/16 03:37 PM
1	'Teach HIM early' - Sexist feminist Ad. Campaign Now I'm just imagining some guy smacking the other in the face while yelling "Stop hitting me." I think I get what you're saying though. As long as you don't appear to be engaging or initiating a fight, you'll have an easier time legally. I appreciate the response.	/r/MensRights	30/06/16 07:17 PM
2	'Teach HIM early' - Sexist feminist Ad. Campaign It feels like these groups fear losing their cause to other groups, when in actually they're just bringing other victims to the light. It's both understandable and very ignorant. And strangely, by convoluting the issue with race or gender, they're obscuring the issue. Why not say "Stop Domestic Violence" or "Stop Police Brutality?" It's much clearer, more concise, and helps all victims without diminishing anyone, so what's wrong with it? That's an honest question too. It doesn't hurt them at all…	/r/MensRights	30/06/16 04:59 PM
1	Defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone by fraternity members is dismissed That's a fair point. That doesn't really mesh with the judge's ruling though. They could have made a case for Rolling Stone being irresponsible for publishing their names, but that's not the route they chose. I would like for there to be some law or something in place so that publications wouldn't post names until a verdict was reached, but that's a separate issue.	/r/MensRights	30/06/16 04:44 PM
3	'Teach HIM early' - Sexist feminist Ad. Campaign Exactly. I just don't get why the message couldn't have been "Violence is wrong." Why did they need a gendered qualifier?	/r/MensRights	30/06/16 06:12 AM
2	'Teach HIM early' - Sexist feminist Ad. Campaign Is that a legitimate argument one could make? "I wasn't hitting them, my palms were open!" That's a genuine question, by the way. I'm sure that a closed hand is considered worse than an open hand, but a slap is still a slap, and an open-handed strike is still a strike.	/r/MensRights	30/06/16 06:12 AM
4	Defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone by fraternity members is dismissed U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel in Manhattan said details about the alleged attackers in the November 2014 article by Sabrina Rubin Erdely were “too vague and remote” to make readers believe that the plaintiffs George Elias IV, Ross Fowler and Stephen Hadford had a role in the alleged rape. I DDG'd their names and the UVA case came up. Suggesting that the details are "too vague and remote" is absurd. And that doesn't even touch on those who know them personally. Another $7.8 million defamation …	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 09:47 PM
11	Voice modulation used in interviews to mask and change genders. The results may or may not surprise readers of this sub... TL;DR: The interviewing process is slightly biased against men. Sample size wasn't terrible (234; 1/3 women) but I'd have liked it larger. Men consistently outperformed women, but men who were modulated to a higher pitch did better, and women modulated to a lower pitch did worse. This suggests is that there is a positive bias towards a feminine in the interviewing process. The author points out that once you get passed the first and second interview, the disparity vanishes, but references studie…	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 09:39 PM
5	'Teach HIM early' - Sexist feminist Ad. Campaign "Teach him early" "Violence against women is wrong." Why must they insist on making this a gendered thing? Also, have these people never heard the phrase "You should never hit a woman?" Because I know I've never heard "You should never hit a man."	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 09:15 PM
1	Written debate about whether the gender pay gap exists. Even the feminist admits it is tiny, 1.4% figure quoted. Ah yes, the Bill Burr argument. If we're going to go that route, I would have gone with "Guys are usually the ones paying for dinner/drinks/everything else." 1.4% is a small price to pay for chivalry, if you ask me.	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 08:57 PM
2	False rape accuser Emma Sulkowicz, the mattress girl, just received the highest award "Woman of courage" from world's largest feminist organization for her false rape accusations and her harassment of another students You're right, it's an issue everywhere. And even if the person was guilty, that still wouldn't validate mob "justice." In no way should we promote that, guilty or innocent. If you're unhappy with the system, change it. Don't try to circumvene it to get the outcome you hoped for.	/r/PussyPass	29/06/16 08:10 PM
1	Written debate about whether the gender pay gap exists. Even the feminist admits it is tiny, 1.4% figure quoted. What I meant was that it was the most interesting point she raised, but she was unable to substantiate it. I don't have enough data to claim it goes either way, but then again, I'm not making any claims. Unlike O'Neill.	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 08:08 PM
3	False rape accuser Emma Sulkowicz, the mattress girl, just received the highest award "Woman of courage" from world's largest feminist organization for her false rape accusations and her harassment of another students there's really been no wrongdoing by the university or the criminal justice system The wrongdoing was of the media, who used the names and thus put the accused at the mercy of the public. There should be a system in place that prevents the names of those involved from being made public until a verdict is reached.	/r/PussyPass	29/06/16 07:35 PM
1	Written debate about whether the gender pay gap exists. Even the feminist admits it is tiny, 1.4% figure quoted. The loyal servant hypothesis states that women are seen as less likely to receive outside offers than their male counterparts so are less likely to leave or ask for a higher salary since they have less of a safety net with fewer offers. One of the most interesting points for the gender pay gap, and it's not sourced at all. Unfortunately, that is the closest O’Neill gets to refuting the point that men ask for more money (a point Gormley unfortunately doesn't cite but I've read elsewhere). If the …	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 05:53 PM
1	Woman convicted of molesting a five year old boy, won't spend a single day in jail They only go through if she breaks the law again. Well that's bullshit. They also typically aren't fully executed for petty crimes I really hope this isn't considered a petty crime.	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 05:18 PM
1	NYT: Female Under-Performance is Men's Fault No worries man. Happens to the best of us.	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 05:11 PM
1	Woman convicted of molesting a five year old boy, won't spend a single day in jail The title suggests it as if it was a fact; as if the judge literally gave her nothing, while in fact, he gave her a suspended sentence. This may later prove the title right, but it's not true as of now. This seems to have been schnalzar's point. Still not worthy of the downvotes in my opinion, but that's how it goes. I'm not aware of any statistics on how many suspended sentences actually go through; if you have anything on that it'd be quite interesting to read on. At the very least, it seems s…	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 04:33 AM
2	Woman convicted of molesting a five year old boy, won't spend a single day in jail This is true, I grant you that. I'm not sure where my head was at.	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 04:28 AM
–	Woman convicted of molesting a five year old boy, won't spend a single day in jail Candice Cortez was sentenced Monday to a suspended sentence of three to eight years. I don't know why you got downvoted; she was given a sentence, it is temporarily suspended as she is pregnant (what are you going to do, stick a pregnant woman in jail?) and based on past trends, she likely won't serve her time. You were 3 for 3 there. Either way, You've got my vote, but it sucks to see people be so reactionary.	/r/MensRights	29/06/16 02:57 AM
5	NYT: Female Under-Performance is Men's Fault Agreed. I was mad until I read the article, and thought "The author was entirely fair in their analysis." Either link to the proper article, or title the post correctly. Edit: Because I'm an idiot (made -> mad)	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 06:48 PM
1	NYT: Female Under-Performance is Men's Fault Personally, I find that idea to be much more offensive than the questions themselves. It’s saying that female test-takers are so fragile that they’re seeing these questions and, overrun with emotion, becoming far too distraught to remember how to multiply and divide on a calculator. Katherine Timpf (author) nailed it. Nothing more needs saying.	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 06:43 PM
1	This is 3rd wave feminism for you. Top comment about letting trans people into military sarcastically remarks about the murder of "brown people". Never mind that most of the countries/groups the US is at war with right now treat women horrendously. If you are changing what they have to accept then the will be a whole rehaul at MEPs. I don't actually know what the process involves. Do you think you could explain it to me (or point me in the right direction) so I know why you think it'll be problematic? Don't you want he military to pay for anything they ask for? As I said, I'm a socialist. I'd rather the government pay for it. I don't get any of this. Then why are you telling the military what to do? I clarified why I didn't get it. It wasn…	/r/MensRights	28/06/16 04:00 AM
1	UK TV presenter: Richard Madeley: ‘I won’t allow women in my dressing room without the door remaining open. I won’t go through the same ordeal as Sir Cliff Richard’ I don't blame the people so much as the system. People will exploit anything if given the chance, and the system practically welcomes it. I'm not as familiar with the military, but I know that university policy has increasingly moved towards "Guilty until proven innocent." When the system makes it so easy, of course people would abuse it.	/r/MensRights	27/06/16 07:29 PM
1	UK TV presenter: Richard Madeley: ‘I won’t allow women in my dressing room without the door remaining open. I won’t go through the same ordeal as Sir Cliff Richard’ I was genuinely confused, but that does make a lot of sense.	/r/MensRights	27/06/16 07:25 PM
1	This is 3rd wave feminism for you. Top comment about letting trans people into military sarcastically remarks about the murder of "brown people". Never mind that most of the countries/groups the US is at war with right now treat women horrendously. It's shorter than it looks, I swear! Mostly just quotes for context. Would they be a separate category at MEPS or combined with the gender they are? Just have them examined based on genitalia, put a notice if the genitalia is surgically altered, and have a specialist on staff for HRT. I don't think this is so prevalent to require a complete rehaul or anything. What is the criteria to determine a person can claim a gender? If you're 'cis,' you're what you are. If you're trans, either biological s…	/r/MensRights	27/06/16 07:23 PM
1	85 Percent Of Female Marine Recruits Flunking Out Of New Combat Tests This is the main point here, I think. It's not about keeping women out, it's about keeping incapable people out. If women happen to fall into that category, so be it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	27/06/16 04:06 AM
1	85 Percent Of Female Marine Recruits Flunking Out Of New Combat Tests While I can see the (potential) validity in that, I've also heard that in real-world tests of this, it isn't necessarily true, and also, having women on the field can be a distraction for men because they tend to be overly protective of women, sometimes to the detriment of the mission. As per what /u/Ultimate_Failure was getting at, is the investment worth the return when it comes to female troops? Would you pay company A to make 100 suits if only 15 of them came out right? Why not just pay comp…	/r/PussyPassDenied	27/06/16 04:03 AM
2	85 Percent Of Female Marine Recruits Flunking Out Of New Combat Tests Well then everyone should be held to that standard. Men and women alike, if you can't pass an appropriate test for the tasks at hand, perhaps you shouldn't be there. And yea, some women can beat some men. But we're talking general statistics here.	/r/PussyPassDenied	27/06/16 03:46 AM
2	UK TV presenter: Richard Madeley: ‘I won’t allow women in my dressing room without the door remaining open. I won’t go through the same ordeal as Sir Cliff Richard’ a) What were the consequences? b) Are people seriously so immature that they can't hear the words "penis" and "vagina?" I mean "cunt" I would understand, but those are the proper terms.	/r/MensRights	27/06/16 03:39 AM
1	UK TV presenter: Richard Madeley: ‘I won’t allow women in my dressing room without the door remaining open. I won’t go through the same ordeal as Sir Cliff Richard’ women and minorities The former I understand, but the latter?	/r/MensRights	27/06/16 03:38 AM
1	UK TV presenter: Richard Madeley: ‘I won’t allow women in my dressing room without the door remaining open. I won’t go through the same ordeal as Sir Cliff Richard’ I was actually getting invested in your conversation here, from the legal perspective.	/r/MensRights	27/06/16 03:36 AM
1	This is 3rd wave feminism for you. Top comment about letting trans people into military sarcastically remarks about the murder of "brown people". Never mind that most of the countries/groups the US is at war with right now treat women horrendously. I'm not saying that all trans people should be put in the army if they want to, just that if they are willing and capable, they should be allowed to. If they are depressed, that's not a qualifier for trans people. That's a qualifier for all people. If you can think of something specific to trans people that should prevent them from serving in the army, let me know, because there's nothing that comes to my mind.	/r/MensRights	26/06/16 09:29 PM
2	This is 3rd wave feminism for you. Top comment about letting trans people into military sarcastically remarks about the murder of "brown people". Never mind that most of the countries/groups the US is at war with right now treat women horrendously. I'd imagine that testing would be based on biology; without HRT you stick with 'default'; with HRT, we'll, you get the gist. And yes, I'm sure some people will be opposed to this, but I can't imagine anything more just.	/r/MensRights	25/06/16 09:48 PM
1	Ralston Calls Out Bilbray For Playing A Gender Card Yup. But then again, we kind of expected this sort of thing once they put a guy like Trudeau in charge. The man's first move was a 'gender neutral cabinet,' and I haven't stopped being dubious since.	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/06/16 05:48 PM
1	Ralston Calls Out Bilbray For Playing A Gender Card I did notice that. She had a look of incredulity at first, doing one of those fake laughs but it clearly wasn't terribly traumatic to her. Then, things slowly snowballed into a whole rigamarole.	/r/PussyPassDenied	25/06/16 07:29 AM
12	Senate overwhelmingly votes to require women to register for the draft. I was more expecting this.	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/06/16 06:05 PM
1	Ralston Calls Out Bilbray For Playing A Gender Card I thought that was blatant sarcasm (see "no sir-y') but I'll add a "/s."	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/06/16 04:55 PM
1	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day I believe you missed what I said. To quote: I don't have an issue with you celebrating whatever you want to. I just dislike that people are making it a cultural thing to make Father's day into a thing about mothers If your mother means the world to you, that's wonderful, but lets not diminish the fathers that did their best.	/r/MensRights	20/06/16 04:50 PM
1	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day I mean obviously corporations are self-serving, but I'm still going to protest what they say. Besides, they only say things that they know will work, and the only reason this works is because we all value mothers much more than fathers. If we can change public perception, such ads will stop existing.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 07:09 PM
1	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day If they have an objection but hold their tongue, I'm going to have to blame them more than myself, but that's just me.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 07:08 PM
2	Ralston Calls Out Bilbray For Playing A Gender Card I hope the Conservatives were criticized for it, because they were acting childish. I've taken harder hits to the groin and walked it off. Also, I lost so much respect for Mulcair when he yelled "What kind of man elbows a woman?"	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/06/16 05:32 PM
2	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day Well I would hope that people would be able to understand the message. If they're confused, I'll clarify, but the point of this is to disperse the message, not just give it out sparingly. That said, I never post this sort of stuff to Facebook anyways, so it doesn't really affect me.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:30 PM
1	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day Do single fathers get respected on mother's day by corporations or on a large scale? I'm seriously asking, because I haven't seen anything. I don't care what individuals do. Let families do what feels right. I just don't like the sponsored ideals.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:27 PM
1	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day I'm glad someone else shares this sentiment. I don't want to celebrate the minutia, because it takes away from celebration. You survived another year? Cake! You haven't gotten divorced? Party! It tires me, man.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:25 PM
2	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day And the first reply: Exactly, I think mother's day is for mothers and father's day is for fathers, even if you pull "double duty". Also, a great deal many comments pointed out that it seems to be satire, so that's a thing.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:24 PM
5	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day I don't have an issue with you celebrating whatever you want to. Celebrate your mother every second Thursday if you'd like; I'm indifferent to it. I just dislike that people are making it a cultural thing to make Father's day into a thing about mothers, single or otherwise. That's my distain.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:21 PM
4	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day I'm against handing out hats to begin with, but I see what you're getting at. How I feel is that if the kids want to thank their mother on father's day, sure, but when you start making it a cultural thing, it's wrong. Old Navy with their shirts and that other toilet paper company are trying to make "Celebrating mothers on father's day" a thing.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:20 PM
0	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day I'm actually pretty okay with stopping celebration. I never liked the idea of making trivial things so big. "Congratulations, you've survived another year!" "Good for you for not getting a divorce yet!" "You're still a parent? Praise for you!" I get it, parenting is tough. I don't mean to take away from that. I just don't like the idea of celebrating it. I'll give my mother 6 gifts a year if I want to, but I actively avoid it on mother's day. She just gets a hug and a grumble. Mothers get a day,…	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:17 PM
2	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day This is a shot at women, just not at the ones who are appreciating fathers. If this offends you, you're either misunderstanding it, or you're the kind of person this is aimed at.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:11 PM
5	Found this on Facebook. Good to see people standing up for Father's Day For the uninitiated.	/r/MensRights	18/06/16 05:04 PM
13	Ralston Calls Out Bilbray For Playing A Gender Card Women aren't weaker than men, but women can't take the same aggression that men take. But they're not weaker than men, no sir-y. /s	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/06/16 05:03 PM
38	Ralston Calls Out Bilbray For Playing A Gender Card A couple of weeks ago, a Canadian (female) politician missed a vote because our Prime Minister accidentally hit her breast with his elbow. She said something like 'I was so traumatized I had to leave the room' and I couldn't help but think "Maybe you should have left for good." I don't particularly care what gender my politicians are, but if this is the limit of their tolerance, man or woman, I don't want them caring for a goldfish, let alone a nation. Edit: Wording	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/06/16 05:02 PM
1	Woman tries to create a false rape accusation but her victim is saved by filming it. Bizarre. Well I'm glad there was a happy ending to this after all.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/06/16 03:44 AM
15	Woman tries to create a false rape accusation but her victim is saved by filming it. Bizarre. It's sounds to me like this story should have bee on /r/pussypass if "nothing useful came of it." That's ridiculous.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/06/16 02:39 PM
1	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison I was thinking that he probably drove drunk, but you didn't explicitly say he drove. Still, how did he get away with that? Stupid faulty justice system.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 05:17 PM
1	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison I was trying to word myself carefully, but what I meant was that if an officer does lead a suspect, any conclusions drawn from that shouldn't be admissible in court, as you seem to agree with ("Some of these tactics can be looked at negatively and thrown out in court or ignored in prosecution"). That was my point here; not that a cop can or cannot do them, but that it wouldn't be admissible. Tying it back to the beginning, if the OP was able to coerce a confession out of the other person, or lea…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 04:32 PM
3	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison An officer is allowed to treat a suspect as hostile, meaning they can lead them into certain conclusions. This is used because people are often reluctant to admit that they, say, murdered babies, so it's more practical to see if you can get them there. As far as I know, no evidence in a court of law can be used if the suspect was lead to that conclusion, unless the judge permits the lawyer to treat them as hostile, usually because they are being uncooperative.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 02:52 PM
1	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison I don't quite know the rules, but I'm pretty sure the cops aren't supposed to do this. You can't lead a suspect and then use that as evidence, unless you're treating them as hostile within in the courthouse, and even then, that's at the judge's discretion. I'm not a lawyer though, so feel free to correct me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 02:50 PM
1	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison I'm a little disappointed he didn't serve time for something like that, but I'm glad your friend got out of that safe and sound, and a little richer too.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 02:49 PM
7	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison I would have been terrified, but first and foremost I'd be getting them as far away apart as possible. A drunk man is unpredictable, and all it takes is the slip of a finger. That man deserved every charge laid on him. Hopefully something resembling regret passed through his mind.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 03:11 AM
16	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison the dad and mom tried to get the guy charged with rape and kidnapping of a minor but he ended up somehow turning it on them and sueing them for something Well he probably sued them for threatening to kill him, and I'm pretty sure the charge is worsened if you're wielding a firearm. I'm glad that man got his guns revoked though. More than anything, I'm happy about that.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 02:47 AM
38	That Time Screenshots Kept Me From Going To Prison That kind of seemed strange to me as well. You never tell them that you're recording, even if you think you have sufficient evidence. You never know what will be considered sufficient. Also, I don't quite know the rules, but you should also be careful about how you word it. I believe that trying to trick them or make them admit to something makes it inadmissible, but if they get there themselves, it's all good.	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/06/16 02:43 AM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". No worries, bud. The internet is notorious for miscommunication. I agree completely though. The adult in question is in the wrong here, regardless of how the child reacted. You have a good day, man.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 11:33 PM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Fortunately, it's restricted to Kansas, but more unfortunately it was set at all. Worst of all is that first sentence though: The case established a precedent which has subsequently been used in the Kansas courts. I pity the young men of Kansas, and I'm disappointed of its court system. I understand what they're trying to do, but they're wrong.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 10:34 PM
1	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I believe you misread the article, or I'm misunderstanding you. To quote: Neighbors said they have not seen either for days. A man answered Vera’s door Tuesday and said he did not know where she went. Police issued a warrant for her arrest before she turned herself in on Wednesday. So, first she was missing, then on Tuesday a man answered her door and said she wasn't home so a warrant was put out, and the next day she turned herself in. That made sense to me.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 10:20 PM
1	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I don't understand your aggression. Poops_McYolo said that the boy probably instigated it, and I said that we can't determine one way or the other. How could you possibly take my neutral statement in a bad way? Besides, instigation can make a difference. It's the difference between "definitely statutory rape" and "maybe full-on rape," and could require additional investigation (eg. was there coercion?). It honestly feels like you commented to the wrong person here. I didn't even factor in gender…	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 10:17 PM
1	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I completely agree that the teacher in this scenario is in the wrong. There's no questioning that. I'm just saying that a lot of kids would be excited to have the opportunity. Sure, in some scenarios there's some enticing, but that's true of some adult sexual encounters as well. Of course, that is very different from coercion or full on rape, but that is why Vera is being tried for "Statutory rape" and not just "rape." There is a significant distinction to be made there. Again, just to reiterate…	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 10:12 PM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". It's definitely a complicated issue that requires a lot more thought than most people admit. But, we work with what we've got. What everyone can agree with is that adults should not be allowed to pursue prepubescent children. Most would say that until children finish puberty, adults should stay away. On average, puberty ends at about 15-17 for girls, and 16-17 for boys. Add a year just to cover the majority of the population, and that lines up with the present laws. As you mentioned, there are p…	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 10:05 PM
1	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Exactly. Many teenage males will have sex with 9/10 women who let them. It's up to the teachers to stay away.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 09:46 PM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Thank you for the link. I don't know if it was my phrasing or a misinterpretation of my comment, but having supportive evidence is always helpful.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 09:45 PM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". And now you're at 2! Thanks, bud.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 09:42 PM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I can already see what's happening as I sit here. This kid probably enjoyed himself, surprised by his fortune. It'll leave some damages to his psyche, but he's not thinking about that yet. And now everyone is going to go up to him and tell him he was raped, and how she took advantage of him and ruined his life, and honestly, I think that might actually be worse for him. Don't get me wrong; Vera deserves to be punished, but this kid doesn't deserve what's coming his way.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 05:11 PM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Apparently I angered someone by saying that. You're definitely right though. They don't call her the devil or anything (as they shouldn't) but they definitely made it clear what the gravity of the situation was.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 05:05 PM
3	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I'm pretty disappointed that they put his picture in there. He's still a minor; I would make efforts to keep him from the public spotlight.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 05:01 PM
5	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Hold on a moment there. There's a good chance it was consensual, but we have no idea whether or not he was the instigator, and considering she was "romantically entangled" with numerous kids, it was likely her, not him, that started things. It's possible she is a pedophile. Maybe she just likes the power position. Who knows?	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:59 PM
26	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I'm not sure why you got downvotes for that, but it's true. From a more objective position, what happened here was horrible and the Vera deserves the full weight of the law on her shoulders. From the teenagers' perspectives, however, it's quite possible that she made them very happy. Obviously, this won't be good for them long-term. Between the effects of being "romantically entangled" with your teacher, to being told a fun* experience was actually raped, I can't imagine these boys are going to …	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:58 PM
20	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". When I was young, all of my male peers fawned over our french teacher. I doubt they'd take a second thought if she made a move. As an adult, it terrifies me that people like Vera can exist in such positions of power. If she receives anything less than due process, I'll be furious. The kid must be confused though; might have been a fun experience, and now everyone's telling him he's been raped.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:54 PM
3	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I'm happy that "Rape" ended up fairly large, but I'm disappointed that "Hot" is comparable in size.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:50 PM
1	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Police issued a warrant for her arrest before she turned herself in on Wednesday. I'm pretty happy with how that was handled.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:49 PM
2	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Police issued a warrant for her arrest before she turned herself in on Wednesday. At least she had the decency.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:49 PM
4	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". When I read the title of this post I was furious, but after reading the article, I was pretty happy with how the author dealt with it. They were fairly objective and didn't add much fluff to it. If we're going to keep writing news articles about sexual predators, this is how it should be done.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:48 PM
7	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I have to say, your first comment kind of made you seem immature, but after this one, I take that back. As an adult, I hate hearing about these stories, but as a child, every one of my peers made lewd remarks about what they'd do to the French teacher.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:46 PM
3	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Given his nature, I would want to keep him as far away from this as possible. I hope they can keep him out of the spotlight. He's at an awkward age right now though, and depending on how puberty has hit/is hitting him, I fear your point will come true. If he looks old enough, he must be old enough, right?	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:45 PM
-1	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I don't know about certainly (given his age; it's younger than I've heard before) but it's definitely happened before. Sadly, I wouldn't be surprised if it happened again. Edit: Seriously? I'm just saying that it could happen, but it's not guaranteed. How is that possibly a negative statement? Just check out /u/thrway_1000's comment if you don't believe me.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:43 PM
4	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". I have to say, as much as this angered me (and I do hate the phrasing they used with "romantically entangled") this is actually well written. It was very objective about the situation, as it should be.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:43 PM
1	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Police issued a warrant for her arrest before she turned herself in on Wednesday. At least she had the decency to hand herself over. Now we just hope for due process, I guess.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:40 PM
18	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". At first I saw the picture on the left, and I thought that was an appropriate picture to use here, and then I saw the pictures of her selfies. I always give the news slightly too much credit.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:39 PM
4	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Let's hope the jury agrees.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:38 PM
6	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". In fairness, if they weren't attractive, the task at hand would be a lot more difficult. They are often surprisingly attractive though, not just above average. I wonder if there's some correlation with the mindset that develops for them. I hesitate to speculate.	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:38 PM
8	Woman gets pregnant by 13 year old student. Media calls it being "romantically involved". Fair enough, though she outlines it in enough detail that it could be fact checked almost immediately, which makes me want to believe her. She also told investigators the boy’s family accepted the relationship, invited her to family gatherings and became “very supportive and excited” when told Vera was pregnant with the victim’s child in January One question on the stand will confirm/nullify this statement, so I doubt it's a lie. Definitely seems like the parents were just oddly okay with statut…	/r/MensRights	01/06/16 04:35 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I want to stress that my opinions are still being refined. This is a difficult topic, and there are no clear-cut solutions here. I take issue with the premise of your first question. Women know what causes pregnancy. They know the risk when they have sex, and if they're completely against abortions, they should think long and hard about whether that risk is worth it. I agree that the father is needed to create a fetus, and I'm not saying he shouldn't be responsible. I'm just trying to find reaso…	/r/MensRights	31/05/16 04:12 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I'd say that the solution is to abortion an easily viable solution for any woman who wants one (unlike what's happening in many US states). There's also the question of women who don't want an abortion (themselves or their families). As harsh as it is, I'd say that the burden lies on the woman; she is the one who will get pregnant, so she should be careful not to be in such a position. As for the father, I don't think it's fair to bind him to the scenario. Even if he himself is against abortions…	/r/MensRights	31/05/16 03:02 PM
2	"Men, you are on notice." Evolutionary biologist Bryan Sykes acts as if males are a potentially extinct species. Definitely sooner than we thought. Self-driving cars seem like they went from conception to implementation so quickly. Watson is already threatening my way of life (medicine). And have you seen the progress on Atlas lately? I'm as excited as I am terrified.	/r/MensRights	31/05/16 06:14 AM
2	"Men, you are on notice." Evolutionary biologist Bryan Sykes acts as if males are a potentially extinct species. This is true. Men tend to be predominant in fields that are more easily susceptible to automation. Anything involving physical labour or monotony is at risk. More social jobs, which women favour, are much harder to automate, but as you said, the machines are coming for those too. Edit: One of Futurism's top links currently: Computer science class fails to notice their TA was actually an AI chatbot. Those social jobs are already threatened, it seems.	/r/MensRights	30/05/16 02:58 PM
1	"Men, you are on notice." Evolutionary biologist Bryan Sykes acts as if males are a potentially extinct species. I concede that I am not in the field. That said, there is no reason to believe that everything cannot be automated. We already have software that can write other software. Why not software that can write software based on a need or a given command? We already have software that can yield the best design, given certain parameters (eg. aerodynamics). Why not software that can design a product from scratch, again, given a need or a given command? The last thing is manufacturing. Why not a multipurp…	/r/MensRights	30/05/16 02:56 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. FeMRA ended up being exactly what I expected, though the Google Images results were indeed unexpected. You make a good point about not stacking the deck. It might balance out if you've got a post on the Feminism sub as well, but it's hard to say which way the pendulum would swing. Purple Pill seems wise though. I'll keep some things in mind as well, and if you decide to go through with it, do let me know. This could be fun.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 10:46 PM
2	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. It might be a bit too late now, but that's just how it goes, I guess.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 10:43 PM
2	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. What about when birth control fails, or when someone is raped? Do you think that abortion should be absolutely forbidden, or just not so open that it's abused?	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 10:42 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. If you're looking to start one, I'm all for it. It'd be tricky to do, but it could be fun. Heck, count me in. You'll want to have some content up there first; just linking to random stuff would probably be sufficient. Just some filler early on. I'd definitely go with advertising on /r/Feminism; I doubt it matters who does it though. If you've got some coding experience, make a bot that looks for "ban" and "/r/feminism" and auto-suggests your new sub. If not, just do it manually; it comes up pret…	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 08:38 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Well I'm sure that's true for many, but many are either ignorant on the matter or they're actually going for true equality (eg. Christina H Sommers).	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 08:30 PM
2	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I'd love to see a subreddit dedicated to that, but I don't know how easy it'd be to start/advertise/manage. Considering that /r/Feminism is a known echo chamber, I'd imagine there's some untapped potential there.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 08:26 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Huh. Does that mean you're against abortion, or is it something else? Still, uniformity is better than not, so as long as you're being equal about it, right?	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 07:49 PM
2	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Did you get the 72 hour bans when you messaged the mods? I tried to get in contact with them repeatedly, mostly just to see if they'd be reasonable, but I just got the same auto-response every time. I just checked, hoping that /r/TrueFeminism would be a thing, but the last post was over a year ago. I definitely agree with your sentiment, though it seems that /r/Feminism prefers an echo chamber to contesting ideas.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 07:47 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. That's true; proof burdens should resolve this issue. Then again, our legal system has always been unabashedly sexist. Still, it'd be a step in the right direction at the least. The issue I'm seeing is that it's hard to prove something was said. You could argue that they'd have to bring in a 3rd party or introduce some legal document, but those aren't necessarily good solutions.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 07:42 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Huh. I wouldn't think feminists were against infidelity, but apparently those ones were. That's so odd to me, but I guess that's how it goes. I got banned for saying "Sometimes yes means no and sometimes no means yes." I gave citations and everything, but I got downvoted a bunch and then banned. That also got be banned from AskFeminists actually. The sad thing was, I was having some good conversations over there, but as I was warned, I literally didn't last a week without getting banned.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 07:37 PM
2	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Supposedly the fight is now for "social and economic equality," but it always sounds dangerously close to "equal outcome" rather than "equal opportunity." Either way, I'm surprised more people haven't realized this.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 07:34 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I gathered there'd be something like that already out there. The issue is that things would quickly approach "he said she said." The woman could claims he told him in time, and the man could claim the opposite, and no one could prove anything. The woman could even potentially claim she herself was negligent of her pregnancy until it was too late (the ol' idiot defence). And then, things just end up going to court, and that's complicated in a situation of figuring out parenthood, especially when …	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:56 PM
3	"Men, you are on notice." Evolutionary biologist Bryan Sykes acts as if males are a potentially extinct species. I love that people forget that everything can be automated. Even automation. Heck, we already have software can paint a canvas, write music, or even write more software. I'm going to go browse /r/Futurism now.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:47 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I feel like we've been down this road before. That's how we got the LGBTQIA+ alphabet soup. Let's just say "Stand together" and leave it at that.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:44 PM
3	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I don't believe you deserve the downvotes you've gotten. What I will say is this: Because circumcision is little more than cosmetic surgery, it should not be done without consent. If an adult, or even an adolescent, wants to have it done, by all means, but don't force it on infants. Also, your comparison to FGM was unnecessary. No one is saying they're comparable (though in some cases, it is). Just because circumcision is generally better, doesn't mean it's still not wrong. Edit: By the way, I'm…	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:42 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I'm not saying men don't have more rights, but I've never heard anyone name a right men have and women lack.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:39 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Oh, you too? What'd you do?	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:37 PM
3	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. This is my position on the matter. I don't care what people want to do with their own bodies, but fiddling with a child's genitalia for what amounts to a cosmetic change is quite frankly ridiculous. I honestly have no idea how you would implement circumcision into an adolescent/adult scenario, but it can be done, it is done, and I believe it's how it should be done.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:37 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Well ideally we would stop the false claims, but speaking up against it is probably a more reasonable goal.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:35 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Did Smallpaul say that, or did the OP? To me it seems like you're conflating. True. You're arguing that the ends justify the means, and this is something people will disagree about for a lot time, but I cannot support the idea that we should combat bigotry with more bigotry. Don't fight misandry with misogyny. Fight it with equality. I don't understand this point. In what say does saying "We shouldn't support misogyny" suggest infringing on free speech? No one is advocating for punishment. We're…	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:34 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I'm not logix, but I'd say both. A man should not be held financially responsible against his will, nor should he be forced to create a child he doesn't want to. First of all, if a woman intentionally gets impregnated by a man (eg. lies about birth control) she should be reprimanded for it. In many cases, a man's emotions get the best of him, and he'll want to protect what's his, even though he didn't want that child in the first place. It's quite honestly emotional manipulation. Second, a man s…	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:24 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. In fairness, this is less of a legal battle and more of a medical challenge. Female birth control works because women essentially have an inbuilt mechanism that can be exploited. No such mechanism exists in men. Think about it like this: Women can only get pregnant in a certain window of time. Only around ovulation, and not while they're already pregnant either. Men, on the other hand, can always impregnate a woman (if she's ready). Oh, and by the way, you have to be really careful that no long …	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:20 PM
2	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Also, the opposite: The right to give up parenthood, when reasonable.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:16 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. This is where it gets tricky, huh? Assuming both parties know, a man should be able to opt out of parenthood, provided the woman is still able to abort once given the news. A legally binding document could suffice here, but one party could refuse to sign, I guess. I'm not a lawyer though; let them figure that out. I don't know what would happen if 1 party didn't know until it was too late though. A woman might withhold the information to trap the man, or the woman might just not find out somehow…	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:15 PM
5	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Upvoted to balance it out; nothing wrong was said. /u/Workchoices is talking about is how men get unfairly tied into child support. The way the current system is set up, the woman has pretty much full control over what happens to the future child, and the man's options are virtually nonexistent. The 'right' than men should have is the right to reject parenthood. If still in the abortion window, a man should be able to say "I don't want a part of this." Unfortunately, this issue is complicated by…	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 06:10 PM
3	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Not sure why you got the downvote; tone perhaps, but the message still stands. I have the right to bear arms (in the US). I don't have the right to take someone else's arms. In the same way, a woman has the right to have a child, but not to force a man to have a child with her. The distinction is quite important, and a failure to recognize it could be dangerous.	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 05:53 PM
6	Feminists surround, harass and attack cameraman Part of his behavior did bother me, when he'd speak loudly (proximity perhaps) or how he spoke to Friedman, but these women should not have treated him as they did. It is childish at best. Worse still is that the workers; the teachers and the security; are essentially permitting this behavior. I've made myself mad again.	/r/PussyPass	22/05/16 10:48 PM
1	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. I think what I thought you meant was "Women should be drafted when they are needed rather than when they're of age." I don't know how I got that from your comment. TL;DR: I'm an idiot and I misread your comment. Appologies.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 10:37 PM
2	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. I'm glad I had that right. Surprisingly unfair that men have to volunteer military time to vote, but women don't. There should be uniformity. Not to sound bitter, but perhaps now that women are also at risk, there be proper consideration for what is to be done.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 10:13 PM
1	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. Edit: I'm an idiot, ignore me. I don't believe that's how the draft works. You register if you're between a certain age group, and then if something comes up, you aid in the war efforts. The idea is to have these things sorted out before war time, so that you don't have to deal with it during. Also, if that's the stance you want to take (and again, I don't think it's a wise one), why wouldn't you say "then everyone should be drafted during draft time"? Why divide by gender?	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 04:21 PM
1	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. It's an explanation, not an excuse. Besides, I don't presume to know the person. Perhaps English is not their native language. Perhaps they were a poor student. We'll likely never know.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 03:56 AM
2	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. Yes, but either everyone should be subject to it or no one should. I don't know how I feel about the draft, but I don't think that gender should play a role.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:52 AM
1	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. Dictionary time: Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights. This woman is definitely acting as a feminist. She's not acting as an egalitarian, nor in the interest of equality. Regardless of squabbles of definition, at the end of the day, she is advocating for the superiority of the sexes, and regardless of where you stand, no one should support that.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:49 AM
3	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. She's not saying that the draft should be abolished. She's saying that men should be registered but not women. It's a sexist position. One should either advocate for the draft for everyone who is capable, or no one.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:46 AM
2	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. If you think that boys are more capable than girls you should see me. Few are more physically incapable. I don't mean to strawman your position; you weren't discussing the sexes as a whole. The thing is, it feels hypocritical when feminists say that women are just as capable as men, but when it comes to things like this, turn around and suggest women aren't as capable and thus shouldn't sign up for the draft. It makes it apparent that they want the good that comes with equality, but not the bad.…	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:45 AM
3	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. Or the vote for that matter (not American but I believe that's how it works)	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:35 AM
1	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. Remember that the draft isn't necessarily placing someone in an infantry role, in fact, due to sexist biases within the military, women are much less likely to be on the front line. Factor that into your position however you will.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:33 AM
1	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. I don't agree that you should get downvoted for this comment, however I disagree with you. I believe the reason that this was posted here is because feminists, despite claiming they stand for equality, seem to be advocating for something else here, be it equity or female rights depending on the individual. Either way, this indicates a bias against men; a stark contrast to what is usually claimed by its proponents.	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:26 AM
1	"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it" - A feminist actually admits (in her own words) that she's fighting for female privilege. In fairness, a fair few people pronounce it "ah-gender."	/r/MensRights	13/05/16 02:22 AM
2	Pussy pass enablers, Gawker Media, got smashed in awesome lawsuit by Hulk, and justice against their double standards was finally served Perhaps, but now I actively avoid articles if I see anything hinting at them. It won't make a huge difference, but it's the principle.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/05/16 11:53 PM
3	For Hillary Clinton, Feminism Means ‘Blame Men First,’ and to Disagree Is ‘Misogyny’ I've got to say, as much as I love the guy, he's said some pretty ridiculous things. Between his comments on race, gender, and the pay gap, he either doesn't know what he's talking about, or he's just appealing to the public. I really hope it's the latter.	/r/MensRights	07/05/16 07:01 PM
3	Man Jailed For Years On False Rape+Kidnap Charge Released After Married Woman Confesses. Woman To Be Released With Petty Fine Your point is both important and so very frustrating. As much as I want her punishment to be proportional to the man's suffering, had it been so, she wouldn't have stepped forward and he would have been jailed for even longer. I really hate this imperfect system sometimes.	/r/MensRights	07/05/16 06:56 PM
3	Man Jailed For Years On False Rape+Kidnap Charge Released After Married Woman Confesses. Woman To Be Released With Petty Fine Why would it? This woman has been demonstrated to have made a false claim of rape and kidnapping. Only women who have made a false claim would be at risk. If you think it's hard to prove that a rape occurred, it's much harder to prove that an intentionally false claim was made, in my opinion.	/r/MensRights	07/05/16 06:54 PM
6	Pussy pass enablers, Gawker Media, got smashed in awesome lawsuit by Hulk, and justice against their double standards was finally served I can agree with that, but I think most people read "against both Hogan and Gawker." If you care, you'd might want to make an edit. Of course, if you don't, that's cool too.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/05/16 06:09 PM
34	Pussy pass enablers, Gawker Media, got smashed in awesome lawsuit by Hulk, and justice against their double standards was finally served I used to follow some of their branches, like IO9 or Gizmodo, but I know avoid anything Gawker out of principle. I'm glad that Hogan won this case, and I hope that others will follow suit where Gawker has wronged them.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/05/16 05:50 PM
6	Pussy pass enablers, Gawker Media, got smashed in awesome lawsuit by Hulk, and justice against their double standards was finally served What do you mean? Disapprove of both Hogan and Gawker? Disapprove of leaking Lawrence's files and Hogan's? Perhaps if you had elaborated, you wouldn't have received those downvotes.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/05/16 05:47 PM
0	The one gender discriminatory sign feminists have no problem with That article just wants gender neutral signs, which I have no issue with. I think it's silly to spend $1100 to replace "Men at work" (despite "men" being a neutral term) but it's not a bad thing. Just make the change going forward.	/r/MensRights	06/05/16 10:12 PM
11	The one gender discriminatory sign feminists have no problem with What? How does that make sense? You don't get an extra 30 seconds in real life when someone is burning to a crisp, right? Goddamn.	/r/MensRights	06/05/16 10:09 PM
2	The one gender discriminatory sign feminists have no problem with I'm going to have to repost this image here. I definitely agree with your second sentiment though; men and women are build differently, so it's neither surprising nor bad that men wind up doing more physically intensive jobs.	/r/MensRights	06/05/16 10:08 PM
9	Dad get beaten hard by his ex-MMA fighter girlfriend over having a friend over too late. She then blamed him and filed for emergency custody. -59 now. I've said this time and again, but we need to overcome our "us vs them" mentality. /u/Tone made a very neutral point, but we just don't leave any room for neutrality. What's worse is that many MRAs criticize feminism for this, but here we see that it's a prevalent issue on both sides of this.	/r/MensRights	01/05/16 06:05 PM
10	Dad get beaten hard by his ex-MMA fighter girlfriend over having a friend over too late. She then blamed him and filed for emergency custody. Others have linked such feminists, so I don't think I need to do so further. I do want to apologize for the down voting though. I think that while your position is misguided (apparently having not seen the worse aspects of modern feminism), I don't think your comment was bad or harmed discussion. You now have plenty of links to get started. I hope you take them into consideration.	/r/MensRights	01/05/16 04:17 PM
2	Petition to change the legal definition of rape to include female on male rape reaches 10K supporters. This means the government has to respond! Yea, it's optimistic to presume anything will be done just because the public wants it. Just look at how many people signed the "Pardon Snowden" petition.	/r/MensRights	09/04/16 05:32 PM
1	Vile bitch gets exposed (by herself) on Facebook for false rape allegations That's strange, because here's what I see: [ Removed by reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]	/r/PussyPassDenied	21/03/16 03:07 AM
9	Vile bitch gets exposed (by herself) on Facebook for false rape allegations Does Facebook not keep a log of these chats? My understanding would be that this information could be requested from them and presented as evidence before the jury.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/03/16 08:25 PM
2	Vile bitch gets exposed (by herself) on Facebook for false rape allegations This image is no longer available; is there still a way to view this?	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/03/16 08:23 PM
1	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" I think what's strangest to me is that everyone tries to make these matters gendered. "Don't hit a woman." Maybe just avoid hitting anyone. Anytime someone makes a gendered argument, I get uneasy.	/r/MensRights	07/03/16 07:44 PM
1	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" I appreciate what you're saying instinct, but that's no justification, just an explanation. As I've said before, I understand why one would reciprocate violence, but we shouldn't condone it. People can walked away from fights, so we should strive for this. I also don't think that gender should play any role here, so let's just remove it from the equation. If A hits B, and then B hits back, B (generally) shouldn't be charged, unless they escalate matters.	/r/MensRights	07/03/16 07:37 PM
1	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" I'm not terribly well familiarized with the law, especially since definitions differs between sources and regions. From my knowledge, battery seems to be a subsect of assault where some physical contact is made, but you seem to be implying that battery is assault + contact. Also, by that definition, wouldn't spitting on someone be battery?	/r/MensRights	07/03/16 07:20 PM
6	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" We should strive to be the best versions of ourselves, which sometimes requires us to stand down from confrontation. Martial arts and self-defence classes frequently teach that avoiding a fight is just as important as defending. If we are to talk equality, we need to drop gender from the equation. If anyone is struck, they should try to walk away from the conflict, but if the need arises, they should be willing and able to retaliate. It should by no means be a primary option though.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 07:36 PM
–	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" Are you saying retaliation is accepted, or that it should be? I don't know that either is true, and though I can understand the plight of retaliation, I can't say I condone it. "An eye for an eye" wasn't exactly the best Bible lesson.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 06:28 PM
2	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" I had no idea that was a thing. Some rudimentary research (ie. Google) says that in both the US and Canada, spitting is assault, which I think is great. It might not be as physical as a punch, but it's much more disrespectful. My only trifle is that no one would take that charge as seriously as a punch.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 06:25 PM
8	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" There are few circumstances when emotion should supercede logic. Even in self-defence, I'd rather be in control than flail aimlessly. That's all pedantic though; self-defence is indeed necessary.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 06:21 PM
1	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" I don't mean to convey doubt; I'm simply uneducated on the matter. I just wanted my point to stand independently; I understand why people act so aggressively when spit upon.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 06:16 PM
5	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" There's something about being spit on that I find extremely frustrating. I could probably walk away from most things, but being spit on or slapped across the face triggers something in the back of my mind. I don't know enough about Rice to have an opinion, but if he was spit on, I understand where he came from.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 03:11 PM
15	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" Rules of Society #1: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. I mean punching up is stupid, but outside of danger or athletics, violence generally shouldn't be acceptable.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 03:08 PM
5	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" I'm going to jump on this as well. What I tend to say is that in an ideal world I'd have the wisdom to walk away, but if someone strikes me, I can't guarantee I can control myself. I'll almost never try to knock someone out, but I can't promise I'll always have control over my emotions.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 03:05 PM
26	Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone" When it comes to physical strength, they're not equal. Why does strength matter? Some women are stronger than some men, so by this logic it's alright to hit strong women, just not weak ones. I don't understand why this is even a discussion. No one should hit anyone, but if you strike someone, expect to be hit back, and too many women assume they can be provocateurs without facing repercussion.	/r/MensRights	06/03/16 02:54 PM
1	Man "laid off" from Yahoo suing for gender discrimination I cannot imagine the mental processes required to advocate for sexism in the name of combatting it.	/r/MensRights	03/02/16 09:31 PM