TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

spamtheant Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by spamtheant on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

You are lucky. If you held her while struggling you probably bruised her wrists. That is enough to be heading for jail and a badly damaged life. That you had worse bruises or scratches etc would mean precisely nothing.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 02:22 PM
12

A shocking read but not primarily a mens rights issue. The attitude towards and treatment of quite young children described is astonishing as is the complete absence of an appropriate legal process, common sense or repurcussions for outrageous actions. Yes the treatment of the boys was markedly worse but the whole exercise was ludicrously inappropriate, barberous, cruel and illegal.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:48 AM
6

Broadly men are more work orientated, more tolerant and accepting of stress, danger and responsibility, more willing to work longer hours and far less likely to take a career break of several years. All of this means that despite a significant and increasing bias in favour of women in almost all labour markets men will continue to be the majority of the highest earners and men will on average out earn women.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:14 AM
28

It might seem harsh but its an important life lesson. Women will be treated far more leniently they will be believed over men unless there is absolutely overwhelming evidence to the contrary and in a situation of conflict between a man and a women the women will always be favoured. You need to be very careful in selecting the women you get close to and if you get in a conflict with a woman you need to be smart and under no circumstances whatsoever should you defend yourself against a woman. Its …
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:07 PM
136

But misogyny is very very rare. Almost all men want to protect and support women. The idea that men seethe with hatred for women and seek to disadvanatge them is nonsense and projection.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:37 PM
18

Misogyny barely exists. It is most commonly used as a means to silence or shame anyone who argues against increasing the already large discrimination or privilige in favour of women, or to silence a man advancing an argument that a woman has no effective response to. Actual misgyny that is hatred for or oprejudice aganist women is extremely rare. Prejudice against men is very common and leads to death and suffering on a massive scale for example men have a shorter life expectancy than women but …
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:34 PM
14

An utterly meaningless test unless they perform the same tests on women, of course tests that compare men and women's pain thresholds and tolerance have been done and utterly unsurprising they show that men have higher thresholds and tolerance of pain. See for example: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2677686/ The widespread myth regarding womens tolerance for pain is just another example of women are wonderful and gamma bias. It doubly striking given that its directly contradictory …
/r/MensRights13/09/21 02:01 PM
3

There is a problem with assuming that men commit crimes involving women because of hate but the far far larger problem is the "so many". Acts of sexual and physical assault by men against women may be large in absolute terms but are rare in proportion to the population. Still less are attacks which are not part of a pattern of mutual violence. There is a strong case that the number of assaults by women against men is of a similar magnitude or even larger than that of men against women but no dat…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:07 AM
5

The fundamental assumption in the question is thet if men are disadvanatged it can only be because women are suprressing men. I would argue that men are on average severely disadvantaged compared to women in every aspect of life but that this is something that is a result of the evolution of society as a whole. Men and women are both just as responsible for this. Feminism has played a part, t s mostly malign and dishonest but it is by no means solely responsible and would have no impact at all w…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:33 PM
3

This is absolutely what should not be done and would simply mirror what feminists do all the time. Along a ssomeone is polite why should they not post their opinions. If we disagree lets produce teh arguments and evidence to demonstrate that not simply suppress them.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:16 PM
3

The five day work week, the 40 hour week, archaic holiday time restrictions, anti-union sentiments; these are all the brainchildren of Capitalists putting the screws to the workers. Seriously? In historical terms a 5 day 40 hour working week is utopian espcially when you think that most are well fed and housed on it. Get a sense of perspective.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:03 AM
4

I don't think ther eis any fundamental connection to capitalism. Male disposability is based on biology and has been true in every society throughout history. What is new is an ideology that says that men are priviliged rather than acknowledging the sacrifices and risks that men disproportionatly bear. The mainstream left wing as far as I can see in the US and to an extent in the UK has been captured by identity politics ideologues whose dogma includes the idea of male privilige in the face of o…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:59 AM
3

Quaaludes which were a popular and legal drug at the time. He made these admissions as part of a plea bargain that he would not be prosecuted and they then used these admissions out of context along with a lot of testimony about his poor character which was unrelated to anything he was charged with and he as effectively unable to challenge. It as basically a lot of gossip/hearsay/bad mouthing ithout anything substantive that coudl be challenged. His trial as results was grossly unfair. That is n…
/r/MensRights01/07/21 12:03 PM
25

This is a very strange judgement. It is accepted by teh judge that one twin is telling th etruth and ha dnthing ot d with the pregnancy and that the other is lying. The issue is that he doesn't know which one. I cannot understand the judgement either from teh perspective of justice or equity. The childs mother was clearly due child support t help support the child. She has been awarded twic ethe normal amount despite no reasons being given as to why more support is needed. On the twins side one …
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:42 AM
1

I have not had that experience but when you I often used ot walk hom elate at night and if you were aware there was someone or worse a group following you then it absolutely could be quite scary. The thing is however that men are properly prepared for these situations paticularily mentally whereas modern society and paticularily feminists seem to do everything they can to make the situation worse for women. First it should be generally known that you are far more likely to be attacked by strange…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:32 AM
12

The reality is that this sort of behaviour is common and consequence free. It makes a mockery of the authourity of courts and the idea that the system is focussed on the neeeds of the child.It will clearly be very upsetting to the child and the mother has clearly placed her emotions above the needs of the child in the short term distressing the child but also risking longer term consequences. If the courts focussed on what they say they focus on then this incident would result in a warning and i…
/r/MensRights01/12/20 12:02 PM
7

The teacher has a serious professional issue. You should not be marked on whether she agrees with your opinions but how you express them. This is especially true since the topic was to comment on a speech by a politician. I often used to deliberately argue against my own beliefs as an exercise. However there is an important lesson to be learnt here. Women are advantaged relative to men and men's lives are considered of little value compared to women's. Any attempt to argue for men's rights will …
/r/MensRights30/11/20 09:30 AM
3

He wasn't the father but the mother that is the point. The child deserves to know the reality rather than what the mother would have preferred to be the case. The real objective sex matters medically and biologically and teh court has rather sensibly decided records shoujd reflect reality rather than wishful thinking.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 10:23 AM
6

I think traditional gender roles arose from typical male and female characteristics psychology and biology and therefore are a very solid foundation which we should only move away from with caution. That needs to be balanced with the awareness that actual men and women vary enormously on a distrubtion around the typical and we should be tolerant towards individual's differences and idiosyncracies. I think treating boys as defective girls has been very damaging and we need to recognise that boys …
/r/MensRights17/11/20 09:53 AM
2

Your story shows the value of due process and that 'believe the victim' is an ideology that leads to with hunts, injustice and encourages malicous accusations. To the extent possible you absolutely should make it widely known what you observed in support of your friend. If this makes it clear the accuser lied then that is a good thing if they did in fact lie. It protects your friend and in all probability future victims. Speculating on whether the false accusations results from earlier genuine a…
/r/MensRights11/11/20 10:59 AM
11

First assuming your question is genuine. Well done asking those who oppose your point of view what they think is good practice as long as genuinely listen to the response. Feminism is a broad movement without a single ideology so a response must be similarily broad. Feminism is a movement that emerges from a human cognitive bias which disproportionately perceives womens disadvantages and disporportionately sees men as perpetrators and women as victims. There is an innate tendancy within humanity…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 10:20 AM
3

At this point it is clear that the girl is making malicous complaints and using the process to harass another empoyee. She should be given a final written notice or dismissed for gross misconduct.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 08:18 PM
1

There is no conflict between the best interests of children and a presumption of shared parenting as their is robust evidence that in the absence of abuse shared parenting is better for children. What does need to be addressed is parental alienation and malicous allegations. There is plenty of evidence these damage children and they would be far less common if they were treated as abuse and this was reflected in the arrangements for the children. In reality this is mostly but not exclusively pef…
/r/MensRights26/10/20 11:54 AM
3

Your responsibility is to support your brother not your friends daughter. This is a live changing event whatever happens for him and he will need all the support he can get. Anything you say in support or sympathy for your friends daughter may get twisted and used aganst you or your brother so I would say nothing. Your brother will need legal advice and to help support that you must safely archive all of the text communications and have him documentwhat happened and all subsequent communications…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 09:36 AM
3

This is grossly unfair to American ghetto/trailer trash. Travellers are far worse. Travellers are violent, criminal and specialise in taking advantage of the vulnerable paticularily the elderly. When the leave a location they leave it totally destroyed and covered in rubbish including human excrement. They show contempt for eveyone except themselves. It is very difficult to overstate the destruction and misery they cause wherever they go.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 03:37 PM
15

The concept of objectification being a negative is nonsense. Objectification is thinking about some person not as an individual human being but in terms of their utility or some specific aspect such as their appearance, strength, etc. Whenever we engage a plumber or a mechanic we objectfy, when we look at atheletes and compare their performance we objectify. When we walk into a shop and seek a shop assistant to make a purchase we objectify. It is natural and essential to being able to function i…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 10:34 AM
3

My redpill moment was an article on the New Statesman ( a left wing british magazine/web site). It used to have good or at least civil and generally intelligent discussion of articles. The article concenred was titled something like how the NHS fails Women and it reported that years life expectancy in Britain which showed that it had gone up for men and women (surely a good thing) and that the gap between men and women had closed a little. I posted a comment that it was a little odd when both me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/20 11:57 AM
3

This is childish nonsense. Men and women make up a single species it makes no sense to talk about one or the other as being genetically superior.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:24 AM
26

The entire concept of hate crime is I believe deeply flawed and should be abolished. Essentially hate crime is an aggravating factor in sentencing if you were motivated by racism in an attack for example that increases the sentence. I believe it should simply be treated as the absence of a mitigating factor. This would mean that sexism, gender etc woudl all automatically be covered.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:48 AM
3

The only justification for shooting someone is in order to prevent that person form seriously injuring or killing someone else. What I saw was a group of police letting an unarmed man calmly walk around a car, get in it and then shoot him multiple times. If there was a genuine concern he was getting a weapon from within the car the there was ample opportunity to physically prevent him entering the car. I am however sceptical he was shot from fear. His body language was calm and unthreatening and…
/r/MensRights27/08/20 10:59 AM
70

The key to understanding what is going on is to realise that risk free paternity tests pre-birth have been available for many years now using blood samples from the pregnant woman and the potential father. Amniocentesis or CVS is no longer required. Once this is clear then the womans refusal to take such a test citing non-existent risks becomes significant. Her ex-partners behaviour and that of his family become the normal and sensible response to a woman claiming he is the father and asking for…
/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:43 AM
12

Yes its fantasy that a child could defend against an adult but it is all fantasy. Boys and men are far more likely to suffer from violence than women and girls and the most common child abusers are women. Everything that is commonly said and done to prevent child abuse is wrong and therefore close to useless.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 08:57 AM
1

Incredible, In the UK the police can hold you for 24 hours without charge and then they must apply to a judge who can extend it up to 96 hours. If you are arrested for terrorism you can be held up to 14 days. This is punishment without trial and not a small punishment either. How the judge can decide that turnover in the police is enough of a reason for this is completely beyond me. It essentially says that police ineffeciency or incompetence is enough reason to hold someone indefinitely. Effect…
/r/MensRights31/07/20 08:36 AM
6

This is the normal narrative that all accusations made by women are true and men are always guilty. Seen through this lens then of course the trial was an ordeal for the women and that the man was found innocent doubly so. What is not recognised in the articel is that we have no way of discovering the truth for certain but that a trial is the best way we have evolved to evaluate someones guilt or innocent. There is not the slightest concern or compassion expressed for teh accussed man who was fo…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 08:06 AM
2

No you were not unless the pressure amounted to physical threats etc. Nagging, arguing, repeated requests are not coercion.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 09:15 AM
5

The first thing to observe is how low the problem is: " At least four children have been killed by a parent in the past five years after a family court granted access. " That is less than one a year and whereas each case is a tragedy this is hardly evidence of a widespread problem and it is before there is any examination ias to whether the death woudl have occured had access not been granted. The second point is that women and specifically mothers are much more likely to abuse and kill children…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 11:05 AM
7

It's a surgical procedure ALL surgery has risks and those risks can be severe. The consequences of complications of cicumcision call all the way up to death and every year babies die from it. That is a significant negative consequence. I don't think anyone would argue that death is not a negative consequence. There are no positive effects.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 12:14 PM
5

The evidence is beyond reasonable doubt that he did not rape or assault the women he was conficted of attacking. He may have attacked others. The scary thing is how difficult it is to be found innocent. In this casethat his accusers actively pursued meetings with him and sent friendly messages seeking meetings after the alleged attacks was insufficient against accusations made many years after the event.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 07:02 PM
33

"I am on the pill" Must be the commonest lie.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 01:36 PM
2

I don't frequent pussy pass denied but i have occsionally followed links to it and in all the cases I have seen. It is a girl making an unprovoked attack on a man who then retaliates. There is perhaps an element of enjoyment in violence against women but it seems to be more taking enjoyment in a violent attacker who believes themselves safe from retiliation finding out that actually their victim actually can retaliate. This is the point of the title the pussy pass being the idea that women can c…
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:13 AM
19

WHat is so amusing about this case is not just that the women started an equal pay lawsuit despite being paid more than the men but that they were offered what they are now asking for and rejected it in negotiations. There is a fantasy and denial of reality element to this which often seems typical of feminist arguments. How can you start an equal pay court case when you ar epaid more and specifically rejected what you are now claiming you should be awarded in earlier negotiations? This is simpl…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 05:19 PM
6

When you factor in that this was her perspective and we have not heard the mans pespective at all then it gets much more disturbing. You can be certain his perspective is more favourable towards his actions than hers and hers has him doing nothing much wrong. It may be that his perspective is that she was the one who wanted sex and she pushed him into it but that he was reluctant and declined. The thing is men are not indoctrinated as victims without agency so he will never report the incident a…
/r/MensRights11/05/20 03:11 PM
1

Any man who reads this list of 'inappropriate' behaviour should be terrified. It consists of things like putting his hands on peoples shoulders, puting his hand on somebody's leg afetr they told him of a sexual assault, holding a hug a little to long... It seems any contact can retrospectively be defined as inappropriate, implicitly sexual and deviant. They can then be used to publcially attack you and destroy your reputation. Personally I think anyone making these sort so fcomplaints hsoudl be …
/r/MensRights05/05/20 12:09 PM
1

This is partisan b*****ks as was the case against Kavanaugh. As it stands at the moment in the US no male politician is safe from this sort of accusation. It is frankly ludicrous that people put any credence in this sort of unsubstantiated accusation after decades and paticularily when it is completely inconsistent with the earlier statements and actions of the accuser and no contemperaneous report to the police. This is a major mens right issue. Whether you are a republican a democrat or like m…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 02:03 PM
2

The Tara Reade accusations are deeply implausible as the Kavanaugh ones were. What we need to oppose is the assumption of guilt whenever a woman accuses a man of sexual misconduct. We need to change mindsets so that accusations made many years after the event and paticularily acusations which significant develop or change over time are treated as inherently unreliable. This can't be a partisan political argument. It needs to be about the nature of justice, the presumption of innocence and the be…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 08:41 AM
8

The basic idea behind transgender that someone's sex is mutable and dependant solely on what they feel their sex to be is crazy. No one should be prescribed hormone therapies to arrest puberty or to transition until they are an adult and that they have been assessed as not suffering from unrelated mental health issues. Schools should not behave as if the fanatasy of gender detached from biology is real. That the argument is based entirely on the right of girls and that boys are only mentioned as…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 12:15 PM
16

It says something rather strange about priorities. In the UK hospitals have quite rightly been ruthless at eliminating all non-essential procedures and any procedures which have a high risk during the pandemic so no elective surgery and nothing which results in significantly impaired immune systems unless absolutely essential. This make sense. Now why continue with circumcisions? Most will not have complications but some will and that will take up hospital beds and resources. All for non-essenti…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 08:41 AM
-3

Sorry but you just need to toughen up a bit. Part of the reason they do it is probably because they can see it has an effect on you. In older saner days I would advise to match them comment to comment and it would either stop or change its nature into mutual banter. In todays deeply sexist hypocritical world this would be dangerous someone might complain and that you had been subjected to the same or worse from a group over an extended period of time would be ignored and you could be punishsed f…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:36 AM
15

I would be careful, It may be satisfying but she is still potentially dangerous in how she can influence others. Annoying her is not a smart move. Put her in jail or stay clear.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 02:25 PM
1

No no no no no!This remark is very plainly a joke. Yes occasionally men have been arrested for similar jokes (the nottingham airport tweet springs to mind) but the tweet is not a problem. it is the reaction to such a tweet. Some women do murder men but there is no indication that the woman who tweeted is one of them and in the main men can tweet similar jokes without it being career ending. Lets campaign for what makes sense; that people use common sense and do not willfully misinterpret jokes a…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 08:33 AM
1

I watched the video for just over 1 minute and there was nothing of any concern whatsoever. In some cultures he would be considered standoffish. If this is the worst that can be found then anyone complaing should be subject to public derision. The constant shifting of what is acceptable and the ability to redefine almost any interaction as a problem long after the event because a woman retrospectively decides she was uncomfortable is a serious problem. I am not a US citizen so I know little of h…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:27 AM
4

It will have to be carefully worded. If it is a sport where women and men compete sperately and the man wants to compete against women by identifying as a woman then the law should protect any sport association or body which only allows women who are biologically women to compete against complaints of discrimination or unfair treatment. I don't think th elaw should ban anything as such and certainly not anything as broad as men competing against women generally.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:26 AM
-2

The design of the advert is bizarre. There was no need for the depiction of a situation where she chooses to rescue a female before or perhaps even instead of a man. It would work just as well perhaps better if there was not a man cluthcing the boat while she rescues a woman. Why bring this up at all? There is nothing to say she is a feminist or that she prioritises women over men so I think it should be assumed this is an unintentional impression.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 02:09 PM
20

No one who has actually watched top level women's football (soccer) knows it is played at a very low standard somewhere around a reasonable amatuer (good pub team) or young teenage school team level. A high proportion of international goals come from incredibly poor defending or outright mistakes by defenders which would be career ending if commited more than once or twice by a male player. How do you put a value on such things? Women need seperate leagues to protect them from male competition b…
/r/MensRights13/03/20 11:23 AM
32

Actually the woman's explanation is bizarre and misleading. By this definition every thermodynamic process is spontaneous, so everything that happens at a macro scale is spontaneous which is a bizarre way of looking at it. Water boils because the pressure is lowered the mans explanation is correct. However the man's comment is also graceless, pedantic and pointeless so deserved some sort of put down but bringing 'mansplaining' into it is equally crass.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 09:45 AM
16

Really, lets not sink to their level. At worst this is one women being mildly selfish. At best she has recently sat down and is putting something into or out of her bag before picking it up and moving to free up a seat. Lets focus on real issues not trivial nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 03:35 PM
1

I have a fear of being in a shop when a small child needs help, perhaps they fall over or are lost and distressed. I know I would feel a strong sense of duty to help but I also know that doing anything at all near a distresed child, is extermely dangerous to me as a man, even walking away. Being found next to such a child is extremely dangerous. Thsi is despite the fact that statistically child abuse by strangers is very rare and the majority of child abusers are female.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 10:33 AM
4

Absolutely In the UK at least the ONS statistics are clear the most likely person to abuse the child is the mother and this exceeds the combined rate of the father, mothers boyfriend and male relatives. The father is the safest of mother, mohers boyfriend (not father) and father. This is not at all the popular view. Interestingly I have seen a study (can't remember where) that showed that allegations of abuse are a predictor of abuse occuring but that it was slightly more common for the person m…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 10:27 AM
4

To give the family court judge his due the overwhelming majority of rape accusations in family court are clearly false. This is for once easy to establish because of changes in the law relating to legal assistance. The law was changed so that no one got any assistance unless they allege sexual assault etc. Extremely unsurprising the rates of such accusations shot up, varying quite a lot by region but sometimes as much as 400%. It is difficult to see the increases as anything but due to false acc…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 02:58 PM
4

This is all about Women's lack of agency.The women concerned were using Weinstein to gain an unfair advanatge. Just think about the risks versus the benefits, Weinstein got sex, the risk was unquantifiable but extended to complete destruction of his business and long term jail. The women got a career boost fame and money, the risk was he failed to deliver. Now who had the power? I would say all the power was with the women and it continues to be with the women who have reneged on their agreement…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:37 AM
1

it isn't true given that sex is determined chromosonally then the sex is determined and fixed from conception. It is unsurprising that the development of the foetus is as far as we currently know common in the early stages but so what? What relevance does any of this to anyhthing have apart from the detail of human biology and medicine?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 11:44 AM
22

A misleading non-linear (lograthmic?) scale which magnifies apparent differences bewteen countries when the rate is low. Large chunks of the world with no data. Implausible data so for example Sweden as a hot bed of rape in europe? The UK, US and northern europe worse than much of africa, the middle east and India. No idea wher ethe data came from and whether it is genuinely comparable between countries.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 03:24 PM
5

A post that claims just one queen of England is not a good post in which to be telling people to look things up. I am not a historian but I can say that Elizabeth I and Victoria are not just two queens of England but arguably two of the three most important monarchs in English history. I could add into that Bloody Mary who played a massive part in the formation of England as a protestant country albeit by her failed persecution of protestants and we have 3 queens of England alone who ruled alone…
/r/MensRights11/02/20 11:20 AM
14

My conversion was when I posted a comment on an article which claimed women were being failed becasue although life expectancy for men and women had improved the gap to men had closed. My post which said surely it was a good thing that live expectancy for both had improved and that the disadvantaged group had caught up some of the difference. Being subject to a barrage of accusations of misogyny for this post and the implication that a substantial and vocal group of people think I should die ear…
/r/MensRights11/02/20 11:09 AM
-46

I don't want to defend her but I think your reply to my comment shows exactly why we need to reserve judgement and have a presumption of innocence until there is an appropriate investigation. She does not in fact have a previous domestic violence conviction. She has an arrest for misdemeanor assault for which she was never prosecuted. The evidence against her seems overwhelming but consider Harvey Weinstein where there seemed to be a mountain of evidnce but prosecutors only thought two accusatio…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 01:22 PM
-103

Personally I am against this petition. There is a huge problem with women making false accusations which gain publicity and following which prominent men have their career destroyed all befoe any investigation let alone prosecution and conviction for the alleged crime. Frequently it turns out the accusations were false or grossly exageratted by which time the damage is done. In the case of Amber Heard the evidence against her seems overwhelming but it often does in these cases and if men deserve…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 11:47 AM
5

The studies I have seen before regarding this is that male doctors on average choose more challenging specialities with higher risks and accept more difficult and challenging cases. The point is that any comparison is quite difficult and will require correcting for many factors. I would be surprised once this is done if any sex difference is not very small compared to variation within the sexes. It is annoying that this sort of meaningless comparison is widely publicised as demonstrating male in…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 09:21 AM
5

The dull stupidity is what shines through to me. The tits comment is clearly a rebuke to someone asking about a physical characteristic the recipient might be sensitive about. The question is clearly rhetorical with the actual message being ask this sort of question is rude. The woman seems to have completely missed this and sees the message as an attempt to offend rather than rebuke. Yes irony is present but mainly just plain stupidity or an incredible level of narcisissism which prevents them …
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:21 PM
5

The suffragettes did nto campaign for women to get the vote just rich women. The article is a nauseating exercise in the justification of terrorism that would be condemmed as outrageous and unacceptable in any other context.. The suffragists deserve praise as a collection of moderate and reasonable pressure groups. The suffragetes deserve nothing but scorn as self serving, terrorist extremists seeking an extension of rights solely to the wealthy. The actual achievement of votes or women primaril…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 02:13 PM
3

1: Are men more violent than women? Yes they are but the overwhelming majority are not violent. 2: Are men only capable of severe forms and varieties of violence? Clearly not some appalling crimes are commitedby women as well as men. 3: What type of violence do women commit in majority? Child abuse and child murder. 4: What are the causes for the disparity in perpetration of violence? Why do more men do it? Is it biological, cultural or something more complicated? At root biological but this is …
/r/MensRights05/02/20 02:03 PM
6

Well my first thought is that this is a troll post. If it isn't then the honest answer is that I don't know much about you. As you are someone who identifies themselves as a feminisst you are a member of a relatively small proportion of the population. You presumeably someone who is concerned with and strongly interested in the relationship between the sexes and the differential treatment that each receives in society. You could be male or female. The range of possible beliefs which are encompas…
/r/MensRights31/01/20 12:01 PM
5

There is a sense in which this is good. The prevailing view and treatment of domestic violence is based on a false premise and is biased and sexist but I worry about the approach taken. <i>" The aim of my research is to give a platform to men who have suffered abuse in the hopes of designing bespoke interventions, and possibly in the long term, informing policy. "</i> Giving a platform is a political goal. The goal should be to better characterise domestic violence in someway. As soon as the goa…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 10:19 AM
7

The analysis is correct apart from the gratuitous association of those that opposed brexit as being self loathing and anti-white racists but the solution suggested seems to be to add white working class boys to the list of victimhood groups. This will in the long run simply make things worse and widen the victim culture which is a big part of the problem. The solution is to ditch identity politics completely and work to dessiminate a culture of pride, education and hard work as the route to succ…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:57 AM
173

The two key facts about the Sally Challen case are that she had seprated from her husband and that she drove to his house with the hammer. It is difficult to se ethis as anything but a planed and considered murder. Given taht she had left him how can it have been the case that she needed to kill him to escape his 'coercove control'. Pathological jealousy does seem to fit the facts best.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:21 AM
6

This is a misuse of the term zionist. You mean Jewish. Most but not all Jews are zionists, some of those who believe that Israel should not exist are ultra-orthodox who are probably strongly in favour of circumcision. There is a strong movement to conflate anti-zionist with anti-semitism on one side and a use of coded language trying to sneak genuine anti-semitism through as anti-zionism. I have no idea of the detailed history of circumcision within the US and whether the Jewish population had a…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:50 PM
7

You need to recognise the world as it is not as it should be and act based on that. Moral superiority and that you are in the right are no comfort if you are unemployed and unable to get a good reference. In the real world as a man you are going to be discriminated against in a number of ways: a) Sexist anti-male remarks are considered normal and acceptable. Complaints will be resented and mark you as a trouble maker and result in increased support and sympathy for whoever made the remarks. b) H…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:38 PM
5

Aleander Economou . He was prosecuted for harassing the father after telling him he would take legal action if he continued he said he raped his daughter. He then did take the father to court for libel and bizarely and quite outrageously lost using the defence that although he did libel Economou it was in the public interesthe did so because of his daughters suicide. The argument was that it was in the public interest to bring to publicise police handling of vulnerable accused with mental illnee…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 04:10 PM
68

The reporting in this is infuriating. The reason the police changed the direction of their enquiries and she was prosecuted and that the police put pressure on her was that one of the men she had accused had a video recording which backed his side of the story and undermined hers. The video makes the the pervasive story in the UK media of a poor innocent and vulnerable girl bullied into a false confession a bit of a stretch to say the least. I listened to at least 3 reports on the TV and radio t…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:47 AM
1

The most important thing is to address the victim mindset. That will limit your life and potentially damage you. The fact of the matter is that most people are not out to hurt you, if you work hard at whatever career you choose you will probably do well and if you are genuinely being badly treated you can move. If you worry about being assaulted then simple precaustions like not getting completely bladdered and being assertive and acting confidently even if you are not will minimise risks. Do no…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 09:09 AM
2

Do men sometimes claim credit for work performed by women? - Yes undoubtedly this does happen. Men also claim credit for work performed by other men and women claim credit performed by others. Do more senior and well known people often get the credit for work performed by more junior people who are part of their team? - Yes and to an extent this is appropriate. Are women systematically given less credit than men. - I don't think there is evidence for this. Examples can be found but it is easy to…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 02:37 PM
3

I believe a large majority of those trifficed are actually men and boys but it will depend on the definitions used. Teh really sneaky misleading part is 1 in 2 of women killed are killed by their partners only 1 in 2 men are killed in a similar way. Hidden is this is something like 50% of women killed in an act of violence are killed by their partners where only 5% of men killed in an act of violence are killed by their partners but men are 5 or 6 times more likely to be killed in an act of vole…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 02:03 PM
17

In the UK we have a policy of trying to push women's football on TV. It can be interesting to watch as a close game can be exciting whatever the level but the standard is so poor. It is at a good schoolboy/mens pub team level which if the game is not close or there are not many chances makes it horrible to watch on national TV. Excruciatingly poor play by the best women's teams in the recent world cup made it all farcical with commentators desperately avoiding criticising the most basic errors w…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 09:22 AM
6

All of the measures will probably increase the 'gender pay gap' but the worrying thing is that they would fine companies because of a 'pay gap'. Simpsons paradox coupled with statistical fluctuations mean that pay gaps are inevitable even without any systematic differences in women's and men's employment choices, life styles etc. With the known differences in behaviour it is perhaps more suspicious that discrimination is taking place if there is no difference in the average wages than if there i…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 09:49 AM
2

The two obvious things to attack Jess Phillips on are: Her amusement at the idea of discussing any issues concerning men including high male suicide rate. Her support for false accusations against a political opponent John Hemming and complete failure to apologise. I like the id aof parody posters where she laughs at male suicide and perhaps the same picture of her laughing at false allegation against a (male) political opponent. She is (in my opinion) a hate filled bigot who cannot fufiill her …
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:38 AM
2

Yes. Self defence by a man attacked by a woman is a serious mistake under almost any circumstances. Even is the woman has a weapon and uninjured and the man is unarmed and seriously wounded the outcome is almost certainly prosecution and jail for the man. The only sensible strategy is to flee and to hope there is some recordings of the situation because if it comes down to his word against hers then he will be in jail. Men must: Flee Secure any evidence, recordings Under no circumstances report …
/r/MensRights31/10/19 08:23 AM
3

A pedantic point but the use of 'assuaging' is wrong. It means to lessen an unpleasant emotion or feeling. I just don't see how this applies. I think what is meant is causing, advocating or similar.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 10:34 AM
3

No absolutely not. Women frequently get away with murder or receive only token punishments because of emotional after the fact justifications. The classic being that the husband was abusive, controlling etc, or that the woman suffered from depression etc. which resulted in her killing a child. That women get this sort of leniency is wrong and it would be no less wrong if given to men, not that there is any chance of that happening. This was clearly planned and premeditated and should be treated …
/r/MensRights28/10/19 12:58 PM
1

I have heard no criticism on sexist lines regarding kurdish women. The criticism I have heard is firstly strategic, that it gives power and influence to countries inimical to the US/West in a strategically important region. Diplomatic that it removes an american ally but also undermines the relationship between the US and all allies in that it makes the US appear an unreliable and fickle partner, especially given the lack of consultation, or warning to the kurds. It has also been criticised that…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 07:59 AM
22

When a guy is ugly no one cares as long as he is wealthy or confident and healthy. There is a difference in how women and men are judged but in this regard men have it better than women. The remark about women's soul is partly a consolation for less attractive women but also a recognition that many attractive women are shallow, self obsessed and destructive to those around them.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:42 AM
1

Leaving aside the legal issue which I am not qualiified to comment on and about which I suggest you get advise from a layer specialising in family law in your jurisdiction I think you have some signifiant relationship concerns. On teh face of it you expressed a strong wish not to become a parent yet your soon to be wife has embarked on a course of action which will force you into exactly this situation. If you are married and she adopts two children then you will become a parent. It could be tha…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 08:20 AM
8

I started to read your first reference and it immediately became clear that criticism of Israel was considered anti-semitic and that the main concern was that nordice countries criticised Israel on human rights grounds. WIth this definition of anti-semitism in place then teh scandanavian countris can be classified as dangerously anti-semitic. This reasoning is not just false but dangerous in undermining the seriousness of true anti-semitism. It isn't anti-semitic to crticise israel just as it is…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:31 AM
6

No. This is not what the case was about or what the court decided. The case was that because of his limited capacity to understand consent theer was a concenr that he may be a danegr to women and therefore he had been restricted in his contact with women and ability to form sexual realtions. The judgement is not withstanding his cognitive difficulties he ha sthe same right to attempt to form such relationships as anyone else. We do not have the details but I am sceptical how big a threat he actu…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 07:06 AM
1

<i>"There is nothing the police can reasonably do to make you leave. If they asked you to it would not be a lawful request."</i> There is nothing <b>reasonable</b> they can do but there is a great deal unreasonable they can do. The sad fact is that antagonising the police even if you are completely in the right is a significant risk. You could be under a charge of assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest in no time. Your name would be published as arrested in an incident in a park concer…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 08:07 AM
13

The ironic thing is that at least here in the UK the official statistics show that women commit more child abuse than men. The real point isn't however between men and women but that it is rare and usually committed by close relatives most commonly the mother.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 07:46 AM
1

This is very naive. The story would be 'man arrested in park denies accusations of peadophilia'. The internet would not side with him it would destroy him and teh absence of any evidence of anything would not help him.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 07:42 AM
21

It all seems trivial. I was on several occasions punished at school simply for being a boy, for example when I refused to apologise to a girl who was punished for talking when other boys were talking who were not punished. All boys were asked to apologise. I refused as I had done nothing wrong and was punished by being made to stand facing the wall on a chair for six hours (with a break for lunch). I was hit in the head by a femal teacher repeatedly because a text book I had bene given had a pag…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:00 PM
8

<b>Any</b> surgery has risk of complications, infection, reaction to the aneasthetic, mistakes etc. Circumcision is no different and reported complications include death, loss of sexual function and infections. I simply do not understand how anyone can claim there is no solid evidence of harm. Wher eit becoems harder is to demonstrate harm from people who have had successful circumcision operations versus people who have not. This are ai sn inherently subjective one and there are peopel who clai…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 04:34 PM
14

Or it might just mean that society is misandrist and googles algorithm reflects this. I am reminded of googles efforst to create an AI which assisted in recuitment. They abandoned it when it produced 'sexist' results ie it tended to advise recruting more men than women. However this simply reflected the training data which was that the majority of top developers within google were male. What the google team concerned were unwilling to confront was that the algorithm was not biased but it exposed…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:23 PM
17

There are a number of reasons for this. We are more concerned about risks associated with rare and unusual events than everyday events.Schools or mass shootings are actually a relatively rare cause of death but are worried about more than more prosaic shootings, or car accidents etc. The news agenda is set by what sells that is what will attract the public.The death rate from medical mistakes is large. Deaths following circumcision are unspectacular personal tragedies. They are not BIG news. It …
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:01 AM
15

We should not descend to the feminists level. The tube/train does not look at full. No one is standing so what is the harm of her putting things on the seat next to her? If there were people standing, then it is selfish, if no one is standing it is just common sense. My experience is that it is almost exclusively women who put bags etc on empty seats when trains are rammed full with lots of people standing. The same women always look very unhappy about being asked to clear the seat. Those women …
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:43 PM
1

When you start talking about self esteem issues in the context of days to celebrate and support sub-sections of society I worry. Self esteem (and confidence) naturally develops as a result of achievements and competence which are the natural result of hard work and perseverence in some domain. Self esteem and confidence do not arise simply because you tell someone they are wonderful because of their sex, genetic background because the recipient of the praise knows they are fundamentally empty. H…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 08:29 AM
4

That mutilation and abuse of boys is widespread and many peope approve and encourage this is not a mens right issue? Individuals may prioritise other issues such as educational disadvantage and discrimination, disparities in the treatment of men and boys under the law compared to women and girls, life expectancy and health care provision etc. but clearly this very much is a mens rights issue. Those that physical abuse and mutilate boys in this way need to be prosecuted for child abuse in the sam…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 07:29 AM
1

I am not sure that he is criticised but the lack of proportion shown in the comments is incredible. The consensus seems to be that he behaved badly in using the phrase 'holy shit' when suddenly caught in a mass shooting with his family and in fear for his and their lives. To me it is amazingly mild considering the situation and anyone whose main reaction is to focus on that has a rather warped sense of priorities and a distinct lack of empathy. Nothing to do with mens rights however.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:21 AM
1

<I> The bottom 90% earners should apply themselves and work harder to get into the upper 10% bracket. </I> Everyone should be urged to work harder, hard work and education are the route out of poverty and into prosperity but there will always be a distribution of income and there will always be a top 10% and bottom 90% so the idea that the bottom 90% can work harder (or do anything else) and become some of the top 10% is complete nonsense. It is mathematically impossible. The top 10% can ony be …
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:18 AM
2

The story is b*****s men as a group pay far more tax than women so any tax cut paticualrily for high earners will reduce the tax burden of men more than women but the impact as a whole will be on households and that will as likely as not affect women just as much as men. That Boris is proposing a tax cut which only benefits those with an income substantially above the median income is a legitimate cause for criticism. Arguably any economic stimulus is much reduced and it does appear in some sens…
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:13 AM
1

There seems to be a growing misuse of the word myth to mean real events which are ideologically inconvenient but may not be typical. (for example rape 'myths') Men do face intense pressure to be financially independent and because men have none of the support women receive and must face systemic anti-male bias men must be emotionally strong. Those are not myths. Men do not face pressure to be masculine, men <B>are</B> masculine by definition. There may be pressure to be macho in some sub-culture…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 12:51 PM
10

You do know that Titania McGrath is a parody.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:37 PM
9

Two major objections are that: All surgery has risks and that includes circumcison, the complications range from the minor to complete loss of sexual function to death. As the surgery is completely unnecessary risking severe injury or death albeit with a low probability is completely immoral. The procedure is irreversible and has a significnat impact on the individual concerned. They should make the decision when they are an adult. Personally I can't see how it amounts to anything other than sev…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 07:22 AM
3

Clearly it is a double standard but actually this is probably in his interest. ​ It is important as a boy to realise that you are going to be treated differently from girls, that there is a need to be cautious when nteracting with girls and that they will be given precedence if there are conflicting accounts by a boy and a girls the girl will be believed whatever the circumstances. ​ Better he should learn this lesson now with relatively minor impact than later with potentially worse impact.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:21 PM
3

The analysis is bizarre. they select a third of mass shooters if they had a record of domestic violence, violence against, or stalking of women and then present statistics within this group that shows a high level of domstic violence and stalking and violence against women! That can hardly be a surprise or in any way informative. They then go on to claim that Incels are a problem because 2 people (yes just 2!) within this selected sub-group are incels or roughly 3% of total mass shooters. How do…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 09:18 AM
6

Really - I see no difference between the EU and UK government in this regard and the UK government is much much more dangerous. It has control of the criminal law and has changed it to significantly disadvanatage men making relevant defence evidence inadmissable and enabling police to conduct accusation trawling. If you voted for Brexit with the expectation that once out Britain's establishment will become less misandrist you are going to be very disappointed.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:00 PM
2

gestation is work.... that would imply fertilisation is also work :-)
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:06 AM
3

It would be the end of humanity either way.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 02:54 PM
-3

Is this anything to do with Men's rights? It is a women who seems to have strange views and who is controlling and could damage her childs life prospects. male and female examples of such people exist. It only becomes mens rights if she is treated differently or handling it is prevented because she is a women.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:10 AM
3

Sex selective abortion probably has been an issue but there is evidence that the simplistic assumption that there is one fixed male to female birth ratio in humans is wrong and that it may vary in time, location and in ethnic groups. The assumption that anything above 107 is evidence of abortion of females is just an assumption.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 10:16 AM
8

Her words (translated were: " I hope you go under the ground you idiot. Damn you. You left me for this horse." Wishing that someone dies is ntof itself a threat. This womans comments were clearly mean spirited but if they have any effect they are simply to make her look jealous and petty. Any sort of police action is completly wrong and supporting it is very dangerous from a mens rights point of view. If a single negative comment about someone can result in detention it will be men who suffer mo…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 09:21 AM
2

The problem is the claim to belong to marginalised group and that men do not. Feminism denies any disadvanatge to men except through the agency of 'the patriarchy'. In other words men are advantaged and when they aren't then it is in any case men's fault. The reality is that in every domain of life from health, though education, the law, employment, the media women are heavily advantaged compared to men. Feminism actively campaigns against any action to alleviate male disadvantage for whcih ther…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 09:29 AM
1

WTF?
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:23 PM
13

The article states Brock Turner was convicted of rape. He was not. The article is rightly outraged on the low evidence threshold used to convict. In fact a reasonable peson would probably decide that the weight of evidence was that this was a false allegation. This is fine if depressing but the assumption is that this is race related. This is not a safe assumption as white men have frequently been convicted on similar or even worse evidence. There seems a reluctance to accept men as men, as oppo…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:17 PM
6

This is just a combination of mens rea - That is that the accused must know that they are committing a crime and the presumption of innocence. it can't be avoided without abandoning one or both of these principels which woudl be a disaster.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 09:53 AM
8

It's a joke. Perhaps nto a good one, perhaps insensitive, but it is a joke about a ridiculously small cast iron frying pan. The fact it is so small means it would not be a good weapon anyway but that is part of the joke. It is not evidence of a widespread misandric violence culture. If we start complaining or asking to ban things like this we are no better than the feminists.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 11:27 AM
26

It is in any case rubbish I looked up the situation for Russia which dominates the map. The map refers to a situation where the normal age of consent is 16 but can be reduced to 14 if married. This means if someone has consensual sex with a 15 year old it is statutory rape but if they then marry it is not a offence. However this exemption only applies above the age of 13. When you cosnider that an age of consent of 14 is common throughout the world including europe then the situation is no diffe…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:14 PM
-4

This is more research which deliberately inflates a problem by redefining behaviour as more serious than it really is: ​ 'How does a woman accomplish sexual coercion of an adolescent or adult male? Our research suggests that women are most likely to use psychological pressure such as verbal pleading and arguments, emotional blackmail, and deception' Psychological pressure is NOT coercion. It isn't when women do it to men and nor is it when men do it to women. Blackmail, physical force and taking…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:13 PM
2

You could add wanker, dickhead, scrote and I am sure more as well as endless non-gender related insults: bastard, shit head etc. In any case that the type of insults used to the different sexes are gendered is not surprising and there are insults specifically targeted at men which would not be targetted at women but are not explicitly gendered. Many variations on coward or wimp for example. Overall it is the typical process of feminism. Focus only on things which can be construed as negatve towa…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:08 PM
6

its worse than that conception is equally the responsibility of both parties unless one party lied about being on birth control which is not uncommon. After conception all the of the power and therefore responsibility is a womans. She can abort, give birth and give out for adoption or give birth and raise a child. The choices are hers. The man has no control at all and may not even be aware of teh child. ​
/r/MensRights06/03/19 02:42 PM
1

The first part is true. There is no such thing as reverse racism, sexism etc. There is just racism and sexism. The second part is nonsense. Whatever the sittuation is regarding the aggregate power of men and women individual men and women hold power and if they use that power against someone on the basis of sex or race that is sexism or racism. The argument assumes homogeneous groups identified based on specific characteristics which have the same power and act in the same way and always n favou…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 12:01 PM
2

Ada Lovelace may have been an amazing woman but I am unaware of any significant contribution she made to mathematics. She is certainly not a fantastically important mathematician which is a very high bar when compared to giants like Gauss, Euler etc. What she is known for is writing a program from Babbage's engine to calculate Bernoulli numbers taking advantage of well known properties of the numbers. It is claimed as a result that she 'invented' computer programming but it is absolutely clear t…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:28 PM
1

Legally aggravating and mitigating factors are only supposed to affect the punishment not the judgement as to guilt or innocence. Reality iss of course different.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 11:57 AM
3

It is dangerous to comment on any case if you were not present in court to see all the evidence and how it was presented. I am nervous about the safety of all historical abuse cases if there is no contempory reports and the evidence is entirely based on the testimony of alleged victims. The danger of false memories is real and this is paticularily so against prominent people. The way police and the media approach these cases means that even several apparently independant witnesses are not truely…
/r/MensRights26/02/19 10:55 AM
4

What is this doing on this forum? it is nothing to do with mens rights. ​ I am not vegetarian myself but know many vegetarians. I know many healthy looking vegetarians but i have yet to meet a healthy looking vegan. It may be possible to be vegan and heathy but not often achieved.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 11:12 AM
14

It woudl be nic eif they were dragged away in handcuffs but teh sad fact is that if tehy attacked some poor innocent guy without warning who just happened to be shopping in teh same aisles as her teh outcomes for the man are all bad. Do not see it coming get knocked to the floor and then accused of 'stalking'. End result injured probably minor and probably arrested. After a day or two when teh store video has been reviewed released reluctabtly by the police. No compensation for lack of pay, inju…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:42 AM
3

Its a joke based on some truth which is that women are attracted to 'sweet wealthy guys' and not simply 'sweet' guys. It is self deprecating humour aimed at women. If we get upset at this sort of thing then we are no better than feminists constantly finding trivial things that show that they are being victimised.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 08:52 AM
3

Its a joke. Yes a man who made the equivalent joke about women woudl be hounded out of his job but that would be wrong. Its wrong to attack this women. The road to equality should not be to copy the worst behaviour of feminists biggots and become outraged at almost every remark which has a sexual context or implication.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:31 PM
6

She made a joke when asked about going into the men's changing room. I thought she handled the question quite well. We do not want to become feminisms mirror image, fragile snow flakes claiming victimhood whenever anybody mentions anything remotely sexual about men. Yes if a male coach made a similar remark about a female team he would be crucified in the press and probably lose his job but that would be wrong. We should not copy the unfair, sexist, persecution of those who make an unguarded or …
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:58 AM
7

Just for contrast he <B>served</B> a 7 year sentance for rape. In the absence of any detail there is no reason to think this unreasonable. A premeditated attack which could be expected to kill or seriously injure someone that results in a permenant physical disability is arguably worse than rape. Someone may or may not overcome the imact of a rape on their life. You cannot overcome a permanent physical disability. Why was she not charged with attempted murder? How can a judge decide not to put s…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:40 PM
17

A man who shoots and kills a woman is going to be convicted of murder under almost any circumstances and even if the woman had just kidnapped your child. You will be prosecuted and the prosecution will throw doubt on your account. It will be argued that the man over reacted, the women was just helping, perhaps the women saw the man mistreat the child? Evidence is almost irrelevant a woman was killed by a man, the man is evil dangerous and out of control, the woman was an innocent victim. Bystand…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:43 PM
1

" They told me just to clear my name and drop it as she will always have it on her record anyway and no one will believe her which does give me a bit of peace. " Sadly I don't think this is the case. There have been incidents where a women has made a series of false rape accusations which were only disproved after lengthy investigations with the accused being arresetd each time and even after 3 or 4 failed attempts getting someone convicted. The sad thing is that getting the women prosecuted is …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 06:32 PM
5

I just noticed both posts were by mrwhibbley. The second post was sensible but contradicted the first dangerous post. I searched on the US amazon site and the first product that came up was ethylene glycol based. Do not tell anyone antifreeze is safe to drink. It is dangerous.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:19 AM
4

Well I just searched on amazon and the first product offered to me was ethylene glycol based. It may vary by country and state. I am not unhappy with your post but the suggestion that car antifreeze is just ethanol and water and is safe to drink by mrwhibbley is reckless and potentially dangerous.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:13 AM
12

This is dangerous nonsense. Car antifreeze is most commonly ethylene glycol which most definitely is toxic causing brain damage and kidney failure. Sometimes propylene glycol is used which is generally considered non-toxic but is still best avoided as purity and contamination is spossible in something not intended for consumption. If modern antifreeze really was just ethanol, water, sugar and salt then you would have people buying it to drink, ​
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:00 AM
12

They are producing less accurate translations for ideological reasons by doing this. English has many different sub-dialects and if the original non-english phrase has no implication as to the sex referred to, the pronoun 'he' or 'they' could be used but to use 'she' always means that the person referred to is a woman. That google suggested both 'he is a doctor' and 'she is a doctor' in the example is just wrong. It should have suggested 'he is a doctor' or 'they are a doctor'.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 11:36 AM
1

I must agree with Hadashi_blacksy the questions are not very nuanced and seem to be based on a simple, stereotypical and possibly pejorative model of masculinity with only a few limited parameters. Some of the questions seem extremely odd if not worrying from this point of view.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:41 PM
1

Practically speaking it is never a good idea to use physical force against a woman under any circumstances however extreme you run a very high risk of being accused of assault and quite possibly being prosecuted and convicted. This is true even if you have a video of being attacked and defending yourself. ith no video just your word against hers you will be in serious trouble if she makes a false accusation. If you are in danger of serious physical injury and you cannot flee then the balance of …
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:49 PM
57

No. PEOPLE get it way harder in the 3rd world and developing countries. There are sharp divisions of roles and responsibilities driven by necessity but in all of them you will find male life expectancy much lower than female, violence against men at much higher rates than women and a general environment in which women are protected and nurtured to teh extent possible and men are expected to provide and protect for women. Women will generlaly have less autonomy and responsibility but you can't ch…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter