TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

speaker_for_the_dead Archive

View 0 posts and 190 comments by speaker_for_the_dead on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Yes, women do. Evaluating the data fairly would more clearly show where that occurs and would also include instances where men face discrimination. They had a chance to take an egalitarian approach and rejected it.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:57 PM
3

That kid is going to be old enough to make her own decision one day.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:26 PM
54

Because that's equality, and that is not their goal.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 05:53 PM
3

Until you take accountability for your actions, you won't be able to face your addiction.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 05:16 PM
3

I think its time you file a title IX lawsuit.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:58 AM
4

What do you expect, they glorify [violence against men.](np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/o9bch7/a_tv_show_where_a_man_is_put_into_a_neighbourhood/)
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:55 PM
3

See, women are the primary victims of male homelessness... /s but still widely parroted by misandrists.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 11:45 AM
2

There is nothing abhorrent about keeping an accusation private until there is enough evidence for a trial.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:56 PM
1

Writting codes is not greater than advancing the formulas that code now represents.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 10:14 PM
5

Corporate America needs govt contracts, to get govt contracts you need omwi compliance.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:11 AM
-2

What? No, we aren't that warped. It is horrible what she did and she should pay just the same as Harvey. The fact that Rose came out against her proves that there is some integrity in the movement.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:26 AM
-6

Because he needs female senators to vote for his approval.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 03:52 AM
4

Hey, women have always been the primary victims of having people register on a sex offenders list. /s
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:08 PM
1

Because each Ivy had a sister college for just women.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:45 PM
19

Escape it to where? There is no place to go.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:46 PM
1

If thats an educator I would file a title XI complaint.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 02:28 AM
2

Thank goodness you all saw it for what it really was.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 12:54 PM
8

The court filings seem to support the claims, especially the text message exchange.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:21 PM
6

Is about your expected loss, not just the probability. Maybe the elderly fear it more because they perceive that they have more to lose.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 04:00 PM
1

Was she a feminist? I suppose if she was then it's refreshing to see them recognize that men are victims too.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 07:12 PM
2

More like it they were cussed at or someone got physical and tried to take the airhorn to shut it off.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:47 PM
1

You and your wife need to go to counseling asap.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:20 PM
3

Women are wonderful, so are men. MRAs dom't hate women; they hate injustice.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:25 AM
2

This is the equality we need.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:38 AM
4

How much more genuine the article would have been if she simply stated she was wrong for originally supporting ideaologies that lead to this corruption of justice , or explained how what she originally supported had been perverted. I failed to notice this in her article.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:28 PM
4

File a counter claim against her for sleeping with you while you were drinking.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:19 PM
4

It means you arent suppose to leave until school ends unless given an exception. Its up to everyone, like anything else in life, to choose if they want to obey the rules or not.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 12:36 AM
46

Closed campuses mean students cant leave during lunch to go out to eat. Seems like the ban should have applied to all students.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:31 PM
1

Not if they are indifferent.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:47 AM
2

It means taking it back to its origins, the best interest of the children. It means not jailing parents who are unable to pay support and the courts actually relying on more than just accusations to decide custody.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:59 AM
6

You may be right. The entire system may have originally been designed to provide what is best for the child. Somewhere though, something got horribly twisted. It is not in the best interest of the child to see a parent jailed because they are forced to pay child support that is more than they can afford. It's not in the best interest of the child to give incentives for parents to propagate lies in order to gain custody. The system may have started off with noble intentions, but it has been twist…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:42 PM
5

Depending on the value of the ring you can take her to small claims in order to recover it. I would imagine if you do this you will have a good chance of getting it back based on what you have said. You should argue the ring was a conditionql gift as evidenced by the fact it was financed.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:10 PM
1

Ofcourse she does, it makes it much easier to prove there is a rape culture if you define every comment as rape.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:23 PM
1

Sorry, I fully understand the meaning of the original poster and the meaning of this poster that is meant to parody not only the original poster but the idea only men should be taught not to rape and everything will be better.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:55 AM
2

So we are saying that the entire oneous to prevent rape lies on males because they in the minds of those making the claims are the main purpetraitors of rape but the same would not apply to females and child abuse.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:45 AM
1

Then why have I seen so many people claim men need to be taught not to rape but nobody claims women need to be taught not to abuse children?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:34 AM
0

Tell him you plan to file a title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:57 AM
2

If you constantly end up owing the irs they will not allow you to file multiple exemptions in the future I have been told. Your best bet is to try and keep it as close to zero as possible. Try using their exemption estimator once it is back online.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:54 AM
2

Good luck. I wish you happiness.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:59 PM
11

I understand they didnt know but that doesnt mean she might not still possibly blame them for not protecting you. I only say this because I want you to know that telling her needs to be approached in a delicate manner. I wish I had heard this before I told my wife.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:54 PM
14

Im sorry you are carrying that burden alone. At least I had my brothers with me. I was only physically abused but it still hurts. If you do tell her you should talk to a therapist first. She will probably become angry because of what happened and may want you to cut all ties with your parents as well as your step sister.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:37 PM
13

Did you tell your wife about the abuse? Was she supportive?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:14 PM
1

You should send back a poem by W B Yeats, one of the greatest poets ever, who also is male.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:29 PM
0

Is that Harkness in the background?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:45 AM
2

I recently changed jobs to risk analysis type position so I have started to qualify all my statements.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:14 AM
4

I am sorry I didnt realize you were in Canada. I don't believe Title IX applies to Canada but there may be a similar law.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:41 PM
39

File a title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:41 PM
1

An excellent point that would promptly be ignored or trivialized I'd wager.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:19 PM
-1

Exactly, oh wait no that is the patriarchy lording our masculine superiority over females and subjecting them to an inferiority complex /s
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:54 PM
2

When they say men arent objectified and sexualized all you have to do is point to the movie magic mike.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:59 PM
2

I would love to see them try and mess with someone. You never know who could be a federal employee...
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:56 PM
1

You certainly have my sympathy and wishes for good luck. That said it would be beneficial for you to contact a lawyer now. They money you spend now can save you a considerable amount in the future. You are fortunate she is not working. You should speak with your lawyer to make sure you are not required to pay child care on top of the child support because she does not work. The child care costs in my experience were more than the support. While I do feel sorry you made a choice you would not hav…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:33 PM
1

The female pen cant have a black cap apperently.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:00 PM
2

No he didnt mention it but I think it is something that has a potentially huge consequence so I figured I should mention it.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:46 PM
2

I think first and foremost your friend needs to speak with a lawyer. Secondly your friend has acted as the father and established that role in the childs life. The mother is now neglecting to allow the child to visit the father. If the visitation was set up in accordance with a court order what the woman is doing is illegal. A lawyer should know best how to proceed with this. The problem is though that if your friend paid his ex personally instead of through a court system she could claim that t…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:49 PM
1

You and your wife have some serious issues. I think it would behoove the two of you to get some counseling.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:42 PM
2

Yes the link was. I don't agree with that ruling but it most certainly would not apply to this case. The main crux of the ruling was that the semen was classified as a gift. Something that was intentionally placed in the trash can would not be classified as a gift.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:04 PM
1

Exactly my point. I don't believe the pervious ruling was dealing with something that was intentionally discarded.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:34 PM
4

I don't think that ruling would apply here seeing as how you threw the condom away. I hope you can get out of this ok and take the lessons you learned here into the future. She stopped taking birth control and you had to continue to wear a condom. You two were not on the same page with what you wanted in life and should not have been in a relationship together.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:11 AM
8

Can somebody help clarify something for me? If the supreme court found this unconstitutional how is this even up for consideration?
/r/MensRights23/03/12 03:34 PM
9

Wouldnt this be rape in some places even? Im thinking of countries like those that will prosecute for not wearing a condom if consent isnt given for that.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 11:35 PM
5

It is beyond shameful what they are doing to this man.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 04:38 PM
1

It protects us from not having the women be protected, don't you know that by now... /s
/r/MensRights30/01/12 05:13 AM
2

I can not fathom how this is possible yet a private college like Rose Hulman Institute of Technology was forced to allow women to attend their college.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 05:01 PM
4

Thanks. That is some serious bull
/r/MensRights10/01/12 03:06 PM
7

This site is listed as pornography in my company's web filter and access is denied. Maybe you could add a nsfw link just in case it is the same for others?
/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:37 PM
1

I thought you just had to have the same total number of boy and girl teams; not the same teams for each gender. That is why there is cheer leading but no girls football. It cuts both ways too; if the boys don't want to play then the girls don't as well.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:31 PM
3

and the shrieking will help to underscore the main point as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 09:53 PM
1

I am sorry to hear that, my heart breaks for you as I too know your pain.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 05:14 AM
2

I understand; I was making a joke. I did attend several of the classes I found interesting but i didn't take very many social science classes. The professors also posted all of their lecture notes as well so it was easier to keep up with the classes without being there.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:33 PM
9

You have got to be kidding me. I suddenly don't feel so bad for skipping most of my classes.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:27 PM
16

Well, male readers, before you start cowering behind the sofa fearful of the castrating gender studies professor who's about to get you, let me reassure you. Should have kept going, it only gets better... /s
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:07 PM
3

INo two couples are the same and they need to do whatever works best for them. There is no correct answer because either one will work depending on the couple. It is important though to figure out how you and your partner feel about this prior to marriage because it can end up being a big issue if you don't see eye to eye.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 04:13 AM
6

It's sad that equality in the court rooms for men will be won at the expense of tragedies inflicted upon children. How much more suffering needs to be seen before some courts realize that fathers actually are the best options in some cases?
/r/MensRights09/12/11 04:06 PM
1

I do stand corrected. Thank you very much for pointing out that paper to me.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:54 PM
2

Not to be a pedant but aren't the current results showing the universe is expanding to fast for gravity to take over and contract the universe. It would be a ice death, not a heat death. I figured I would point it out due to your username and mine.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 08:09 PM
1

I thought genetic theory states we tend to take the side of whoever most resembles us in any situation. Men side with men, women side with women most usually. Edit, please disregard this comment as evidenced by the below report. I was thinking of a study that said humans are most likely to save other individuals that look like themselves because not only are we concerned with the survival of our own genes but also the survival of others who have genes that are the same as ours. I was extracting …
/r/MensRights17/11/11 02:44 PM
1

You are implying that a group composed of individuals all behave in the same stereotypical manner. I get upset, and I am sure you do as well, when you hear someone say man up. Why do I get upset? Because there is no one singular action of a man in any given situation. My actions may not be the same as all other men, but I am still a man. The same can be applied to women as well. I am just pointing out the obvious, not all women do the above.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 08:48 PM
1

Any stereotyping of a group of individuals will only hurt a cause that tolerates such actions.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 08:30 PM
8

women acting like women? Saying things like that is why people think the MRA movement hate all women
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:13 PM
2

That really is hard to understand until you are in one of those situations. People who are abused suffer mentally from the abuse and are often not in the right frame of mind. Doesn't excuse what she did in any way but I think the larger problem is the court system allowing this to happen. By letting abuse serve as a defense they are saying it is ok for vigilante type justice to be carried out by individuals. They have set a horrible precedent with cases like this.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 05:00 PM
1

It's about time a celebrity came out and talked about it.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 08:52 PM
0

There is no true anything. Especially when dealing with the internet. That is the larger point I would like to make.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:27 PM
6

really, because no one would pose as a men's rights activist to try and discredit the movement... That never happens /s
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:29 PM
1

Hence the posters name?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 02:33 AM
1

What? The father she was hiding him from was a police officer? If even he can't get the justice system to actually work what does that say about father's rights?
/r/MensRights19/10/11 06:53 PM
3

the whole period attack distracts from the points you make and can give people a reason to dismiss you sadly.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 06:50 PM
4

Is no one protesting this? I can't believe they would be so blatant in their sexism, though I guess I should not be surprised given what I have seen from other submissions on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:15 PM
3

Women only buses? Sorry for my ignorance, but does such a thing exist?
/r/MensRights19/10/11 03:44 PM
1

sometimes all you can say is wtf. I can't believe what I am reading.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 03:48 PM
0

I just hope at least this thread can illustrate that even if a woman says she is on birth control you should still use a condom. Even if they are on birth control nothing is 100% so if you don't want a kid you need to minimize the risk as much as possible. Even birth control can fail if she is taking antibiotics I think.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:01 PM
2

I honestly don't think I was confusing the two. Proposing something vs demanding it would be misguided optimism vs. entrapment in my mind. I guess I'm just put off with the whole concept of hey don't like the way things turned out just leave, but its your life and you are the one who has to live it.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:29 PM
1

serves me right for the way I worded my question. I was just thinking he probably shares it with 20+ guys because it is a dorm toilet which probably means some of the men are drunk which explains why the aim isn't exact.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:15 PM
5

Exactly my point. You didn't take any responsibility for your actions. In fact you didn't learn anything from your first experience because you got a second woman pregnant. I mean you write she had the audacity to propose marriage? What is that? She had the audacity to hope maybe that things could be ok and you could be a family? What nerve! I know this issue is not black and white but your case to me seems to be black and white. You messed up and you cut and ran.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:09 PM
1

how do you share a toilet with 20+ guys?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:48 PM
6

What ever happened to personal responsibility? You can make a choice but skip out on the consequences now if you want...
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:45 PM
3

Exactly. I can't tell you how much my life changed when I stopped caring what others thought about me.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:45 PM
1

Thanks for the detective work. To be honest I don't know if that makes me feel better or worse. Now I know they had it out for him and it probably won't happen to some random Joe, but that is some serious abuse of power. I hope he wins big in his lawsuit.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:38 PM
1

I guess maybe he could make the case saying he was trying to protect the kids by riding against the flow of traffic so he could see when cars were approaching. I would hope the judge will realize how crazy this whole thing is and drop the charges.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:06 PM
1

You gotta cover your bases legally but you should sit down with your wife when you are both calm and talk about getting counseling.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:34 PM
9

The story doesn't paint a complete picture. Was he riding in the middle of the street or was he on the shoulder? Were people walking in the street as well from the baseball game mentioned? I wasn't even aware bikes had to follow one way signs, they don't do that at all around Chicago that I have seen.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:12 PM
1

That honestly may be true but what is the harm in men waiting?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:49 AM
1

The article mentioned something about fatalities I believe
/r/MensRights29/09/11 01:46 PM
1

I just found it very odd that you talked about responsibility by telling us we need to get a shot to prevent someone else having virus that would do them no harm if they had the shot themselves. It's a moot point for me anyways.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:03 PM
1

Self responsibility by trying to shame men into doing something for someone else? I'm sorry I just don't seem to see that.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 09:46 PM
2

If you happen to care about any of the women you have sex with? What are you selling. If they care about themselves they would already be vaccinated.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:56 PM
6

Is it really only applying to women? I couldnt tell from the article.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:49 AM
2

Go take care of yourself. Best wishes.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 07:00 PM
6

He cheated on me; I broke the law. Maybe I should apologize... WTF?!?!
/r/MensRights31/08/11 02:43 PM
17

From the article Sometimes, equality just isn’t fair Translation: When it affects me adversly it is not fair.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 04:48 PM
2

I am sorry to hear that. Counseling isn't about who is right or who is wrong. Whatever happens stay strong.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 02:38 PM
2

You honestly should look at getting counseling. It really can make a big difference. I know this for a fact. I'm sorry things are how they are now but it can change.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 02:27 PM
3

I feel like you did this because you wanted a reaction from your wife.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 02:15 PM
1

Maybe you are right, I think the correct way to have handled this would have been to ask Kachapati what she really meant by that statement while explaining why you don't like the way it is worded.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:59 PM
1

No, which was one point I was trying to make. We don't want to end up like the feminist movement, seeing discrimination in everything wether it is there or not.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:35 PM
1

See i took that as her saying feminists dont enjoy men so they want someone who is distant with them. Not that the original person in question wasnt a man. I think she is being stereotyped as another woman who stereotypes men...
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:26 AM
-2

whoa whoa whoa, hold up. She stated that she has a preference for men who do not use words like happy fun time to describe sex. I see nothing wrong with this statement. She did not demean the man in question in an way. She only stated she would not date him. There is nothing wrong with knowing what you like in another person. What is wrong is believing all people must be that way which was never stated in the comment.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 07:52 PM
1

IG88 supports mens rights; you sir just made my day.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:04 PM
2

Celebate people still have sex organs and identify with a gender.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 07:43 PM
2

you can use a small sample size as long as it is large enough to capture an accurate picutre of the whole. It would require a much smaller sample size to get a picture of residents in one city or state, but 948 people can not account for all the varialbles that define people living in the entire united states. (The same is true when the question is a relatively simple question, like who will win the presidency. There are only 2 actual outcomes, but even then you would need the data set to be wel…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 01:55 PM
1

Why the down votes? This is the first time I have been able to have a laugh from anything that has come out of this disaster.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 04:16 PM
2

Well that certainly makes it more reasonable. Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 07:32 PM
1

I can't really view the article right now since it's blocked at work. Does it say that in there?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 06:00 PM
2

I understand what your saying. Why the hell do the kids get a belt though?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 05:40 PM
1

maybe it's been awhile since I did statistics in class but how does a sample size of 948 give you a 95% confidence interval for 150,000,000 people?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:29 PM
1

Was this a mis trial or a not guilty?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:59 PM
1

I am pretty certain they are used in high end beauty products. I can't really research it here at work though.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:19 PM
1

I feel there is more here than what is being told. Does anyone know what the sister has said about the mother?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:16 PM
1

I am glad your friend has been 1 year sober and is turning his life around. I hope it only gets better for him.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:05 PM
10

Yeah I read noticed that, they all seem to be the same though. I was drunk, then passed out and she took advantage of me. They are only giving the story and nobody is really talking about the emtional toll it took on them after the fact.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 08:19 PM
6

That entire IAMA went to garbage pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 06:22 PM
1

This is why we can't have nice things. I'm joking of course but in every joke there is a hint of truth. The woman in question did nothing wrong and jasenlee has no understanding of what he did wrong.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 08:34 PM
1

Wow, simply wow. If you have to hide who you are then there are problems. Sorry, I hope she can accept you for who you are.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:34 PM
0

It's called earning potential. You're lucky. I got completly screwed by this. I quit my job that paid 43,000 a year due to horrible working conditions. I got divorced shortly after and I started working in a factory making about 20,000 a year. The judge decided I still had an earning potential of what I was originally making even though I hadn't been able to find a better jot and was working at the factory.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 09:35 PM
1

You came to reddit to ask the question because you know what is going on is not right. I have a feeling you know what the right thing to do is then. I would just make the announcement anonymously if I were you.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 02:55 PM
1

There is no risk. I have yet to see any evidence of a risk to women at Yale.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:17 PM
2

Very good article. The comments following it on the site made me sad however.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:05 PM
4

I wanted to say something but I don't even know what to say I'm so flabergasted. How can this atrocity stand? I wonder if any colleges will refuse to lower their standards?
/r/MensRights12/04/11 09:34 PM
1

Both take away something far more valuable than resources. They take away their partners love and trust.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 01:38 AM
1

But you just said it there yourself. They both cheat. Hence they are both cheaters and I'm not buying that much more serious crap, it's wrong no matter who does it.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 07:46 PM
1

Yes I read the article. Would you explain to me how A does not equal A?
/r/MensRights08/04/11 07:06 PM
0

A cheater is a cheater regardless of the sex. Maybe you might draw a distinction to the degree of wrongfulness based on the sex of the person but they are still cheaters. I hold both sexes equally accountable and despise them the same when they cheat.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 04:53 PM
4

Sure they can fix it, at least in Indiana. My ex wife and I worked out our own child support agreement. We both signed a letter and gave it to the judge stating how much I would pay and that is what I pay every month.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 02:35 PM
4

A cheater is a cheater is a cheater. Doesn't matter the sex of the person.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 02:12 PM
1

That's it? That's all the police had to say? What a joke.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 02:14 PM
0

Good work.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 02:07 PM
3

That is a better allegory. Thank you.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 08:02 PM
4

I see, so when you thought it was an issue of freedom of speech you believed only your son's speech should have been protected.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 06:44 PM
2

It's a private school. He was warned and he did not respect an authority figure. He brought it upon himself. Why did it upset you so much for her to say that's so irish if it was fine for your kid to say that's so gay?
/r/MensRights05/04/11 06:34 PM
4

Sorry if it sounded like I thought you were being dismissive. I thank you for honestly asking about something you didn't understand.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 06:24 PM
13

I think stautory rape is still applicable to both of the sexes. Also, I don't believe arousal is grounds to dismiss rape. It can be an involuntary response. If a woman were to climax during a rape does that mean that it wasn't rape?
/r/MensRights05/04/11 06:10 PM
4

You will never get the full picture if you ban people with a different view point. The sad thing is you didn't do anything other than point out the moderators own bias. I'm saddend but not surprised by you being banned.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 04:16 PM
0

It was. The womens center is on the ground floor old campus unless it was moved after 2006 Edit for re reading emails from students and alums. The DKE pledges were blindfolded and walked around all of old campus. They also had a chant about necrophlia so they were not shouting no means yes to themselves.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 10:48 PM
-1

Yeah because standing outside the women's center shouting that means they are all yelling at themselves?
/r/MensRights04/04/11 09:56 PM
1

Thanks for the link, I couldn't recall it and didn't want to search for it from work.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 08:39 PM
3

I don't believe they need to be disciplined. I do not agree with the statements they were making but Yale is a place that prides itself on freedom of expression as evidenced by Shvarts senior project in 2008. Right or wrong, if that is the stance Yale takes then those men should not be given disciplinary action but inestead talked to about how the choices they make will affect their lives.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 08:34 PM
-1

It took place outside the Women's Center building. Most female freshman as explained above do not reside near this building, but a few do along with other freshmen students.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 08:34 PM
1

I can only imagine the reaction of the school had it been a male teacher that was in the photographs.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 08:19 PM
1

Do you happen to live in Chicago by chance?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:07 PM
2

I wish I had the capacity to contribute a witty pun. edit for spelling.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 03:23 PM
1

I don't belive 18 - 20% of women in college are raped. I do believe they believe they were. I went to Yale. They told us at our freshman orientation that if a man sleeps with a woman and she decideds the next day to change her mind about wanting to have sex it is rape. When you spread lies like that it's easy to see how you can get to 20%.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 08:50 PM
4

It doesn't. That seems to be the goal of some.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 07:49 PM
2

very well done.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:54 PM
2

Resident Evil does a pretty good job.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:08 PM
1

I guess it just goes to illustrate how much we have our work cut out for us.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 02:22 PM
2

I thought I was in agreement with you about that being completly ridiculous but then I saw the down votes. Do you mean it's shit like the above that is why we have to fight so hard for men's rights or something else?
/r/MensRights21/03/11 05:02 PM
4

you have got to be kidding me? Someone please tell me this is not real.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 08:20 PM
0

I love how you have been downvoted for making a valid point, and how nobody has any reply to justify why they downvoted you.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 08:16 PM
-4

Sorry, I am really not trying to be mean but how do you know that? Did someone else hear her saying no? Does she remember. If she was to drunk to move how does she remember what happened accurately?
/r/MensRights16/03/11 03:00 PM
6

She can always cook if she wants to play it that way.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 02:54 PM
4

I always thought of it this way, never hit a lady, and a lady is not someone who attacks a man.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:35 PM
-1

I was downvoted with no reason? Someone care to explain?
/r/MensRights08/03/11 02:06 PM
0

No love for the princess bride?
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:32 PM
-2

You would like to think that. I liked to think it too until it happened to me. With no one to listen and no way to improve the situation that I could see I felt an anger growing in me. Some people get lost in that anger sadly. I was fortunate enough to find my way out of it.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:35 PM
-2

I do not think that word means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 08:50 PM
4

Thank you Iowa. Sincerely a single father.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 03:36 PM
1

I am certainly not going to say that all of them look down on stay at home moms. I know feminists are made of a a great number of women who must having differing opions at some time, but my college I went to was very liberal and very prestigious. It seems that it was looked at as a waste if you didn't do something with your education and instead chose to stay at home and raise a family after graduation. I think your last sentence hits the nail on the head also.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 05:27 PM
1

thanks a lot. I'm a newbie here. I agree it is a personal choice and I think them insulting stay at home moms / moms who work part time is dispicable.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 04:20 PM
1

"Berkeley Law professor Mary Ann Mason blames the pay gap on family structures." Is this such a bad thing? I mean if women are staying home and raising children then their income is 0 which will weigh down the average. Doesn't mean that's a bad thing. Also, how do you get the blue lines next to the parts you are quoting?
/r/MensRights04/03/11 04:04 PM
1

If you don't mind, it would be cool if you could let us know what your teacher thinks of your paper after you are finished with it and get it back.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 03:20 PM
1

I wish I went to your college. The only classes I was able to go against the status-quo were the ones I took pass/fail.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 03:18 PM
1

You are awesome. I hope everything works out well for you.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 03:06 PM
2

IF that is what we both agree on? Wow, you really sound like a good person. There is no sarcasm here. I honestly wish there were more women like you out there who were willing to consider the mans view as well. I do not think you are out of line in any way.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 08:38 PM
3

Purely written for shock value. What a troll this woman is.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 08:29 PM
2

What sad times we live in.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 08:18 PM
1

TBH I guess I need to read their paper in its published format then to see exactly what they are using.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 08:30 PM
2

Yes I do think that religious affiliation (or level of adherence to a religion) affects ones susceptibility if we control for number of sexual partners and condom use? You would also have to look at the partners selected, which would tend to be in the same religion.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 08:15 PM
2

I don't actually think they looked at religion in this example. And being that most men circumcised in Africa where most studies take place are religious I do believe it applies.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 07:48 PM
1

I don't know who did, but you are right about the neutral statement. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 09:54 PM
0

I guess correlation implies causation now, what sad times we live in.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter