TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

speakingofsegues Archive

View 4 posts and 175 comments by speakingofsegues on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

At the bottom of the article is a "report typo" button. I let them know that they misspelled "rape".
/r/MensRights20/12/19 02:28 PM
4

We've got Edward Bernays (Sigmund Freud's nephew) to thank for that!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/19 03:16 PM
3

And then there's this.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 10:16 PM
2

Good discussions are always welcome.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 05:36 AM
2

And I agree - I don't think our hate speech laws are a great thing; not because of how they're applied to obvious infractions, but because of how they can be interpreted in order to be applied to way murkier and more subjective, debatable situations.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:12 PM
4

It is here in Canada, and in other countries.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:10 PM
1

I was speaking from the perspective of why the #menaretrash hashtag would rightly be seen as the same as #womenaretrash since the latter would arguably be seen as such. I'm also in Canada and we definitely have hate speech laws, which is a complicated and sticky subject that I'm more uncomfortable with than comfortable. But I agree that it's all subjective.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:09 PM
10

There's a difference between free speech and hate speech, though, and just like racism and sexism, the definition has to be applied evenly. These things can't be a one-way street. When we're talking about ideologies, we can't pretend like one group of people can only be victims - never perpetrators - of it. If it would be considered hate speech to have a #womenaretrash hashtag (and I'd bet it would be), then it has to be considered the same for the #menaretrash tag, too.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:37 PM
1

This movement needs to make up their minds about whether women are inferior and in need of special treatment due to their gender, or equally capable. This sliding scale bullshit isn't doing anyone any good.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:13 PM
29

"We asked 100 women how many of them were men who have been victims of domestic abuse, and none of them were."
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:02 PM
3

What's that argument feminists always make about men not qualifying as victims of sexism because sexism has to be systemic?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:01 PM
6

Great! Sounds like everybody wins!
/r/MensRights24/08/19 06:40 PM
2

You handled your response well.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:14 PM
2

Yeah, it's the same with suicides. Here's one recent example of a female serial killer poisoning her victims:
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:16 PM
2

Correct. Female serial killers tend to opt for things like poison instead of gun violence.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 04:25 AM
1

Well if she is the company right now and she's female, then wouldn't she need a man to fulfill her 'diversity' quota?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 05:55 AM
3

Find out who runs the group and report this to whichever governing body oversees or organizes it.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:33 AM
3

Good lord, this might just be the most unaware, self-absorbed thing I've ever read.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 03:58 PM
8

How is this legal? If a judge literally admits they are sexist, how can they continue to sit when their job is to be impartial and uphold/interpret the law? Where's the part of the law that says the punishment can be determined based on the judge's feels? Fuck everything about this.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:44 PM
2

I believe you.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 04:09 AM
1

What? Of all the things they could ban her for, violent threats is what they go for? Not hate speech or sexism or racism? That's like busting Al Capone for tax evasion. Whatever, at least she's gone.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 09:01 PM
9

Come on, we all know this study was done by men who just want to try and minimize the efforts of women even further. /s
/r/MensRights03/04/19 03:00 PM
2

No kidding. Well said.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 09:27 PM
1

Sounds like someone doesn't know what that word means.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:05 PM
2

It's fair to point out that people who deny the fundamental, physiological, evolutionary differences between men and women are being ridiculous. It's unfair to try and embarrass those getting the short end of the stick in that regard.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/19 04:55 PM
18

But don't be fooled: There is absolutely no male-bashing happening right now.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:54 PM
12

Which is odd (re: the backlash to men who supported it) because there's a photo of a team of women in full-body skin-tight suits - supposedly from 2011 - at some sort of racing event (F1 perhaps) with the word "Gillette" on the ass of each of those suits. And women are saying "that's different because they're choosing to do that." Well, if they're capable of choosing to make themselves objects in one way, why aren't they capable of making themselves objects in another? There's some sort of quote…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:25 AM
1

It's interesting to see people on social media bashing men who took issue with the ad way more than the ad itself was bashing them.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:52 AM
2

It's so interesting to see people on social media insult men who took issue with this ad way more than the ad itself did.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:54 AM
3

Vice What it pretends it is: A relevant and informative news media publication, covering and providing insight on topical, global issues. What it really is: A neoliberal, SJW-filled complaint factory that goes out of its way to find things to be offended by, exercising willful ignorance and gross bias to attempt to stay in the public eye since it gave up the edgy, counter-culture documentaries that made it famous.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:47 PM
2

That's gotta be why Aaron Swartz killed himself, right? /s
/r/MensRights17/11/18 05:50 PM
9

Exactly. And if she's expecting bonus points for that, maybe she's not ready to be back on the court yet.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:42 PM
1

Definitely not.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:42 PM
2

HEY! BODY SHAMING!!
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:42 PM
111

Ramos missed a huge opportunity to throw his sexist wrath at Osaka. I wonder how she was able to somehow avoid his taste for blood...
/r/MensRights10/09/18 03:09 PM
146

People are using every excuse they can to justify her behaviour. "She gets drug tested more than others." "She wasn't allowed to wear her catsuit." "She just had a child." "Men don't get called for the same stuff." I still don't see evidence of sexism. I see a chair umpire notorious for handing out violations handing one out for something the rules clearly states is a violation, and then Serena once again berating officials when she's losing, and then the chair umpire handing out two more. I mea…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 03:08 PM
2

Sure, but that's not my point. Literally all I'm saying is that it's silly to call a 17-year old a "child" because, well, they're not.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 03:15 PM
2

Is she a hypocrite? Sure. But 17 isn't a child. That's just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 07:13 AM
2

Oh, so we're back to women having no agency and being unaccountable for their own actions? Well then, if that's the case and her actions are "wholly caused" by her husband, then clearly she needs another man to keep her in line at all times so something else like this doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:38 PM
3

The UK is seriously fucked right now.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 10:24 PM
6

It took place in Montana.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 03:02 PM
26

Just had a woman on Facebook tell me how this isn't rape since he has to have had an erection and therefore must have enjoyed it. She called it irony and suggested it's aggravated assault at best.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 02:49 PM
7

Oh, Jesus your saviour knows you're not lying? Well then, I guess that's all that matters. Go figure they disabled the comments for that video.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 04:53 PM
3

Are you telling me that 30% of suicides in Michigan are women?!?!
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:22 AM
4

Men are the only ones who get conscripted. It's always been "women and children" first. This isn't really news.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:22 PM
7

Never fear: They're still keen to remind us that 1 out of 4 homeless people are women.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 05:04 PM
1

33x2 = 66, as you mentioned. 33x3 = 99. 25x3 = 75. Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:39 AM
3

Well damn - I remember it being the opposite, but I guess it's changed since then. I suppose my edited point is moot.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:19 AM
11

By positioning the article to focus on the female victims (though fewer than male victims) there is an implication that there must be some reason behind it (otherwise why would you not simply report it in an unbiased way, or focus on the majority?).
/r/MensRights23/05/18 12:00 AM
3

Get out of here. For real? Well, I'm sure once that shrinks to 3 times as likely, we'll start hearing about how 33% of lightning-strike victims are women.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:20 PM
7

The likelihood is high!
/r/MensRights22/05/18 09:11 PM
9

Okay, but there's still no misogyny. I don't see the point in figuring something like this out since there's nothing behind it and no way to change it. It's like finding out who gets struck by lightning more often, and then hinting that maybe electricity has something against women.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 08:47 PM
451

Hold up: Everyone is ignoring the fact that this article is talking about stray bullets. Forget the slant on women being the minority here; we're taking about bullets that aren't even intended to hit the people they're hitting. In other words, random bullets that hit unintended targets by accident end up hitting a roughly 50/50 split of men and women, in a world that is roughly a 50/50 split of men and women? This article is biased because its slant is that almost half are women, rather than mos…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:38 PM
1

Here's one being floated around on FB.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:00 PM
5

Maybe, just maybe, it's not helping men's mental health to wake up every day to a world that tells them they're horrible monsters just for existing with a penis (and remember, to suggest that isn't sexism!).
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:23 PM
16

You're a rapist if you do and a rapist if you don't.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:38 PM
2

Relevant Jump to 3:42
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:40 PM
9

I gotta say, this is a surprisingly dishonest piece from Samantha Bee. Expert-level cherry-picking here. How conveniently she ignores all the examples of where "Grace" took zero accountability. Seems like Bee is advocating for special treatment here after all, not equality.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 11:42 PM
12

Holy shit, no kidding. "I think there are many reasons why a pay gap exists, but certainly to claim that it's solely due to gender is incorrect." "So you're saying that women are responsible for the rise of Hitler?"
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:56 AM
18

Hold up, she's suggesting that women use their voice and go ask for a raise? Shouldn't their boss - people in positions of power - be able to pick up on their non-verbal cues that they want one?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:43 AM
2

Can't believe this article has the audacity to not once mention how he is to blame, causing her to behave this way. /s
/r/MensRights14/12/17 08:36 PM
24

"Killing the king isn't murder because the king has all the power!" "But technically it's not! It's regicide! That's different!" These double standards are disgusting. These people are disgusting.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:40 PM
1

More examples of people who try to change the definitions of words to make them exclusive. It's double-standard, hypocritical bullshit, and these terrible excuses for human beings should be called out for it at all times.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:26 AM
16

Her Ted Talk was recently uploaded, and it's fantastic.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 09:02 PM
1

Thank god she was able to bring up that incident from ten years ago so she can take part in this bandwagon, too.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 10:03 PM
55

First read: "... she expected a ring that was worth 2-3 months of income." Me: Oh dear god no. Second read: "... my ex gf..." Me: Oh thank christ.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/17 12:40 AM
2

For the most part I agree. The only thing I'd add is that the feedback loop plays a huge part of that. When the nice guy is working on himself and is still met with constant rejection, he feels like he's either not doing it right, or not good enough, or that it must be something else, or that it doesn't matter. It's like going to the gym - if you don't start to see an improvement after a while, you wonder what's wrong. Finding girls who are sensitive to this and are at least happy to go on a dat…
/r/seduction28/08/17 08:33 PM
2

And when we stand up for ourselves, we get further shit tests and blamed for "not being cool" about it (ie not just taking their shit). Especially when being accused of something someone is not, that shit doesn't fly, and I'm not going to let it in order to be seen as "being cool about it". And if that makes the girl walk away, then good riddance.
/r/seduction28/08/17 08:31 PM
1

Ah, I misunderstood what your point was, then.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:28 PM
1

I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I was saying I don't see the problem with what he wrote. I am in agreement that any opinions other than the approved talking points are being censored. Aren't we saying the same thing here?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:08 PM
18

I really, really don't see why so many people took such a huge issue with that, let alone to the point of needing a day off work.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:40 AM
3

Hear, hear. It's not insulting to the present or the future to accept the reality of the past.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:40 AM
1

And while we're on it, can we please make a movie about Hitler starring Oprah as the title role? Jesus, it's time for some equality, people. /s
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:39 AM
6

That's all thanks to Edward Bernays, related to Freud. He's arguably the father of marketing and PR. And diamonds are one of the most abundant substances on Earth.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:23 AM
1

Former chump here. At least I finally learned. There's hope for me yet.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/17 12:50 AM
11

Sounds like a systemic problem to me.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:37 PM
18

Once again, proof that more men die on the job than women.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:57 PM
1

Don't you mean "Women Gave Man Best Weekend Of His Life" ??? /s
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:59 AM
9

Preganenant.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/17 12:53 AM
1

The Red Pill: Hard to Swallow
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:31 PM
9

This is terrible advice.
/r/seduction20/05/17 12:36 PM
-1

You're 22. The idea that you've "failed" at something by the time you're really just starting out is ridiculous. Ease up and remind yourself of how young you are.
/r/seduction20/05/17 12:35 PM
13

Title is slightly misleading. Protests themselves aren't an attack on free speech, as protesting is also a right. But banning a film from being screened somewhere because of protests is for sure an attack on free speech.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 06:27 AM
1

You are so, so brave. Please let me know when your special is going to be airing on Hallmark.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 01:41 AM
2

Oh my god, are you okay?
/r/MensRights28/04/17 05:11 PM
10

What kind of raped were you? Please select all that apply from the following list of 300 options.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 09:54 PM
1

If only there was some sort of electric device they could illuminate one's surroundings at will.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:29 PM
6

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:02 PM
42

Paying less isn't the goal; making money is. And if they can spend less on salaries, then they can keep that money as profit.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:19 AM
4

Men who disagree are easily dismissed as stupid, sexist, and ultimately part of or demonstrative of the problem. But women who disagree are seen as traitors to their cause.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:40 PM
1

I know you're trying to be sarcastic, but you're actually right. It is a matter of resources, and not genes.
/r/PussyPass27/03/17 04:35 PM
2

This is a classic logical fallacy: correlation does not equal causation. Just because Detroit is now primarily black doesn't mean black people are what ruined the city. To figure that out you'd have to figure out when the city actually started failing, and the reasons why, which surely have a lot less to do with childish arguments like "because a bunch of black people moved in", and a lot more to do with reasons like the automotive jobs that comprised a huge part of the workforce being sent else…
/r/PussyPass27/03/17 04:30 PM
10

According to my Facebook Feed: Happy International Women's Day! Because women are smarter and funnier and happier and sexier and more well-balanced and overall better than men at absolutely everything and men are literally the cause of all the problems on earth and NO I'M NOT BEING SEXIST BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SEXISM AGAINST WOMEN you misogynist piece of shit, and also Happy International Women's Day! Don't get me wrong, equality is great and I'm all for that, but jesus christ, some …
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:48 PM
18

Verbatim.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 06:08 AM
25

ahem Balls. runs away giggling
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/17 01:39 AM
3

... as some sort of sick display of what not to do?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:59 AM
11

I didn't mention anything about race. I agree that this is just a vile and horrendous attack against men in general, and even worse, as a quite literal "revenge porn" fantasy. How deplorable. And to think this wouldn't even get a second meeting if it was about guys who did that to women, yet somehow this got greenlit for production? Shows about vigilante justice are one thing. But show me an episode of Batman or The Punisher or whatever where they're specifically targeting a gender or race or an…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:58 AM
5

Sweet/Vicious http://imdb.com/rg/an_share/title/title/tt5012644/
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:35 AM
1

Relevant
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:03 AM
37

And I just watched the entire thing. Beautiful.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/16 02:07 PM
1

Yeah, posted the same thing on my Facebook today and a few hypocrites made themselves known, trying to justify why it was xenophobic there but not sexist here. I can't even anymore.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 11:17 PM
4

I live in Ontario. It's legal for women to be topless in public. So even that doesn't count.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 10:48 PM
2

I live in Ontario, Canada, and it's legal for women to be topless in public. Has been for over a decade. Aside from the odd special occasion like the Pride Parade or the World Naked Bike Ride, want to know how many times I've seen women take advantage of it? Twice. And one of them was when I was interviewed on the street for Naked News.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:16 AM
1

No. These are people who think these issues are a one-way street. That only men can be sexist (which, of course, is sexist), that only white people can be racist. Perhaps that only those from the Middle East can be terrorist. They co-opt and redefine terms that are meant to apply to anyone demonstrating a behaviour so that it's something they can call other people but not something anyone can call them. Because equality.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 05:08 PM
1

Pretty sure it's young men who pay much higher insurance rates, too, based solely on gender. And paying more for things? Tell me again about how ladies night works at a bar, Budweiser? Meanwhile I've got my certification to sell booze and previous bartending experience, but am having a hard time finding a bartending gig lately because so many people only want to hire female servers/bartenders, which is actually a completely legal thing to do where I live.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/16 03:02 PM
114

More men die of prostate cancer than women die of breast cancer.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:07 PM
9

Which is a good thing, since courts would uphold the fact that said questions are sexist.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:50 AM
34

That's how they win - they change the definition of something (the definition being completely genderless) in order for it to suit their own victim mentalities while simultaneously exempting them from the same critique, even if demonstrating the same behaviour. Of course, double standards, ironically, is how you lose. Anyone who thinks sexism is only applicable against women is, by literal, unmodified, un-co-opted definition sexist. Same with racism, terrorism, etc.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:35 PM
3

Like Maddox said, they've created a movie that's beyond reproach. As an actor, you can't let bad reviews get to your head - but Jesus Christ, at least understand what the bad reviews are saying. These woman are too smart to be this delusional.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:16 PM
5

She's out on a $7,000 bond? What the fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/16 07:16 PM
3

Her roles in Forrest Gump, The Princess Bride, and many other films are what make her a somebody. Just because she's not as recognized as Kevin doesn't make her a nobody. Whatever "list" she's on is irrelevant since, again, I'm agreeing that she's as popular as he is. I'm just saying that to call her a 'nobody' is just ignorant. I'm sure that, to many people, Claire on House of Cards (US) is their introduction to Robin. But that doesn't mean she didn't do anything else before that.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:50 AM
10

She is by no means a new nobody. She's been around for a while and has done a number of projects. She's just not as well known as Kevin. But I'm not disagreeing with your point; Kevin absolutely can demand a higher pay for his name than she can demand for hers based on draw alone.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:57 PM
4

Whether or not a transgendered person grows a uterus when they transition is entirely up to them and the amount of willpower they have.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:35 PM
1

Professional gamblers surely look at things like weight when determining their bets for certain athletic activities.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:36 AM
10

"We are strong, independent, capable women! Unless you post our weight anywhere, in which case we're fragile, delicate flowers who will break down and cry due to the taunting of other strong, independent, capable women!"
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:35 AM
1

If women are the primary victims of war, then I'm the primary victim of my girlfriend's period.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:59 PM
5

If I owned a company and my female employees left after 79% of the day was done, I'd fire them. Which, in the long run, is beneficial to the overall wage gap myth, since now, with fewer females in the workforce, the overall "average female salary" will go down even further.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:52 PM
1

A point of correction: You absolutely are in a place to defend yourself against any type of abuse whatsoever. Your gender and hers don't mean you have to sit there and take it. So you didn't retaliate. Fair enough. But you've got all the proof you need, including photos and her own confession (which she tries to pass off as excusable). Dude, take this to the cops. All this "be a man" bullshit is just that. Forget playing to genders, be an adult. Adults face consequences for their actions. I expe…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:33 PM
12

Hear hear. It's especially frustrating when they fight so hard to be acclimated and accepted into a society they feel they're outcast from, and yet then they work harder to separate themselves further through these kinds of things.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/16 08:47 PM
105

This is the argument I keep making against extremist feminists, which none of them seem to understand. They want special treatment because of how their grandmothers were treated by our grandfathers, except they want to swing it in the opposite direction with oppression against other groups. As if the solution to oppression is more oppression, just in the opposite direction. Sure. And yet they're against this kind of treatment, they say. I mean, just so long as it's no longer against them, that's…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/16 07:44 PM
2

Getting raped is a shitty thing, but getting raped doesn't mean we live in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:13 AM
31

Yeah, but don't you see what he was wearing? He was clearly asking for it.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 05:35 PM
2

Both are entering without permission.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 05:30 PM
20

Nope - in fact she owned her shit immediately, didn't blame the singer, and said she was unharmed. It would be nice if she told all that to the venue, though, who has banned the punk group from performing there again.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/16 03:25 PM
7

Tell your parents about this. Tell them everything. Be honest about everything, including anything 'bad' you might have said or done. The more you hide, the less credible your own story will be. And believe me, when accused of something like this, anything else you're open and honest about will pale in comparison. Build a team of witnesses. Were there any other people around you when she said she was going to lie about this? Get them on your side. Get them to approach the school authorities and …
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:52 AM
4

Before we get started, we need a bit more information as to what happened with you and your friends which would give her something to "get back at" you for. If you can provide details as to what happened, this will help any advice moving forward.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:08 AM
7

#IBelieveSurvivors(OnlyIfThey'reFemale)
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:34 PM
2

This is excellent. Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:30 PM
2

Okay, I'll entertain the notion that some people just want to change up words because it better suits them. But I won't entertain the notion that that's what's happening here when they use herstory. It demonstrates a gross misunderstanding of the etymology of the word. It comes from ancient Greek and Latin and basically means learning, finding out, inquiry. It's like George Carlin's bit about how they'll take it too far. They think you should call that thing in the middle of the street a personh…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:25 AM
2

I love you.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:17 AM
17

Easy there, tiger. That's why I said "some of these feminists' actions". Now, understandably, you go straight to murdering innocent people and blowing up buildings and hijacking planes, because that's the obvious disconnect. But that's not what I said. You made those connections. So allow me to elaborate by putting it like this: What's the difference between the feminists who were threatening innocent people over something someone else said, and terrorists? One is a group of radicalized zealots …
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:12 AM
29

I don't think it would be too far a stretch to compare some of these feminists' actions (and their reasons for them) with those of certain terrorist groups.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:56 AM
145

"Indeed, the backlash was so great that Lyons’s band members 'decided to leave the band after threats [were] supposedly aimed at both their families and employers.'" I don't care how mad you are at something someone said. To issue threats at that person's associates' families is fucking pathetic and flat-out not okay. Not only is that proving him right, but it's doing so in a way that puts you well into mentally unstable territory. You don't get to threaten people just because you find something…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:59 AM
3

The larger issues at hand... like racism? I love how the literal definitions of these words (racism, sexism) are fully 'raceless' and genderless so that they can - and because they ought to - be applicable to anyone exhibiting the behaviour. But then you have people like BLM or feminists - people who, at their core, have the best intentions - who strive to redefine the word through constant repetition of a way in which they've moved the goalposts in order to make it so that they, themselves, can…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:33 PM
8

Canadian here: Honestly, not that much if you ask most people. If they want to play the 'victims of racialized violence' card up here, they're gonna have to start giving some serious mentions to our First Nations people.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:28 PM
3

I believe you.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:14 PM
1

I'm seeing some people on Facebook going so far as to suggest physical violence against him if they were to ever come across him in person.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:42 AM
1

Time to go watch Mystic River, 12 Angry Men, and other films that remind why mob rule is terrifying.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:49 AM
4

Please do this.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:41 PM
3

Thanks!
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:10 AM
29

#mansplaining
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:16 PM
3

Happy International Women's Day
/r/MensRights08/03/16 09:22 PM
1

Yeah, that's not what sexism means.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:08 AM
1

When I lived in residence my first year of college, there were co-ed floors and female floors, but no male floors. On the co-ed floors, two washrooms were co-ed and one was female only.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 11:07 PM
6

When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem will seem as though it's because of your gender.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 04:59 PM
2

In theory this is what is supposed to happen. In practice, on the other hand...
/r/MensRights18/10/15 06:38 PM
2

In other words, still objectifying women.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:56 PM
2

Thank god I'm "apart" from it, then. For a minute I thought it was going to say I'm a part of it. Whew!
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:40 PM
5

This. For real, this. This is one of those golden West Wing moments when you've just been handed ammunition from the party at which you're aiming. If there's any other party you want to support, this is what you give them. It's the kind of thing someone might get fired for, depending on what sort of backlash comes.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:57 AM
2

So, either be a registered sex offender for scolding her on almost getting herself killed, or be a murderer for actually killing her.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:02 PM
158

But that requires time and effort, and I want to get mad now!
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:24 PM
1

True. I suppose it's that Rust Cohle mentality of getting as many of them out in the open as possible.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:04 PM
0

Being against Reddit's rules, fine. But how is it a shitty thing to hold someone accountable for their ludicrous and sexist comments?
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:37 PM
-5

Do we have to censor hypocritical idiots like this? Maybe a good 'ol public shaming would help.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:27 PM
12

People need to make up their mind: either women are helpless victims incapable of making their own decisions, or they are empowered creatures who don't have to live their lives based on how other people (men) say they should. It's one or the other, not a sliding scale.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:52 PM
0

This is clearly an attack against women; once again, the men are trying to tell the women what they can and can't do with their bodies. EDIT: Whoever downvoted me either missed the sarcasm, or doesn't appreciate a joke. Or is a feminist.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:32 PM
7

Same for racism. To suggest that only one race can truly be guilty of racism is a racist statement. Racism and sexism, in and of themselves, are forms of discrimination. To treat differently, or assume a difference, based purely - or mainly - on race or gender, is discriminatory. How that discrimination is manifested is up to the person holding said belief. For example, if it's assumed that women are worse drivers than men, this is sexist. While statistics may show that women get in more acciden…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:51 PM
45

They're moving the goal posts. By adding extra requirements, they create a definition that they can't be guilty of. While sexism can be institutionalized, it doesn't have to be in order to still count as sexism. The dictionary definition (depending on which dictionary you use) may include something like "usually against women" when defining sexism, but even that doesn't mention anything about social or institutionalized power structures as part of the equation. It just mentions that, historicall…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:44 PM
1

The longest sentence in the English language...
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:50 PM
2

Not the first time the definition of a word has been changed to exempt one group from being guilty of it.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:02 AM
32

Seriously, anybody who has a "trigger" for this should be immediately expelled from law school. Or should we allow people who faint at the sight of blood to become surgeons?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 08:08 AM
10

In fairness, they need that room for black men who are serving time for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 06:15 PM
14

So just because a public space happens to have fewer women than men, it's therefore misogynist? Those basketball courts have been hating women for too long, amiright?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:12 PM
2

I was being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:08 PM
-2

Male privilege all over the place.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:50 AM
1

There's already an organization called Me2We, though. I guess they're both a bit too similar.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 04:24 PM
2

How about WeForWe? That seems like the most egalitarian.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 04:04 PM
1

In case there was any confusion, my 'wow' wasn't meant in disgust - I was blown away by how succinctly he worded this. It was a powerful statement for me.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:39 AM
26

"Become undeniable." Wow.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:28 PM
3

"Yes, porn is a misogynistic and perpetuated hetero-patriarchal objectification of women's bodies, but I have bigger fish to fry right now, like circumcising my 14-year-old son as punishment for enjoying it!"
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:44 PM
13

Also, I find it hard to believe that a surprise as big as this wouldn't have come out by now. You're married with a 14-year-old son, and you're only now discovering how your wife feels about porn?
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:55 PM
7

This is shameful. I've been a fan of a lot of his stuff, but this is just a whole new level of pathetic.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:49 PM
2

Bullshit. The literal definition (in the dictionary) is genderless for a reason: nobody should be able to say they are the only victims of something that anybody can be guilty of. You can be a victim of oppression, and sexism is one way people can oppress others, but to suggest that only one gender is capable of being victims of sexism is, well, sexist.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 08:27 PM
1

Yes. Thank you. I've encountered too many of these "feminists" lately - they seem far less interested in equality and far more interested in getting even. They end up dismissing male victims as being unimportant, simply because men aren't victims of sexism as often as females are - not realizing that, by doing so, they're being just as sexist as the men they raise their pitchforks against. The point is that nobody is more or less deserving of equal treatment than the other, and the frequency or …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:30 PM
1

Because women are powerful, independent beings - not weak and delicate flowers - who are capable of speaking for themselves. Except when they don't say anything. Not because they're drunk or have a gun to their head, mind you. But because they either don't have a problem with it, or fail to say they do. But when that happens, then they're weak and delicate flowers incapable of speaking for themselves. Because, y'know, if a woman hits a man, it's his fault for not moving out of the way.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter