| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | NSW police not all bad after allSo if a man is being beat by a woman he must have caused it by abusing their children or keeping money from the woman? She's just reporting their responses, not setting down a rule of male behaviour. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/15 06:45 AM |
| 1 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net.But based upon the flowchart, who raped who? It doesn't cover that situation. The flowchart is incomplete in that sense. But to answer your question, if both prove their cases, both go to prison. EDIT: It's not possible for both to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that each raped the other, so I should instead say that there's no a priori answer to your question, it would depend on the circumstances of the case. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 06:34 PM |
| 3 | Was It Rape? A handy flowchart, courtesy of lawcomic.net.If someone is too drunk to know what they're doing they by definition cannot know that they are having sex with you against your will It's just poor wording in the last step. Possibly they used that wording because it echoes common rape apologia. "Was the other person so drunk their cognition was severely impaired?" would work better. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 06:25 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter