TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

specialdialingwand1 Archive

View 2 posts and 139 comments by specialdialingwand1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

just 5'11, moderately rich, and super good looking?
/r/MensRights17/10/22 04:30 AM
1

men are people too
/r/MensRights24/09/22 02:54 AM
1

They gave me twilight anesthesia and it didn't do anything. At some point the nurse was like "Can I give him more?" and the doctor said "go ahead" and that didn't really do anything either. I remember my recollection of the event was a little dreamy, but I was definitely awake and it was excruciating. The funny thing is I've had hemorrhoid banding and hemorrhoid surgery. And the colonoscopy was the most painful, followed by the banding, followed by the surgery, which is the exact opposite of wha…
/r/MensRights19/09/22 10:27 PM
1

I was awake for the whole thing and it fucking sucked. I didn't even mention the pain, either. Have you ever had a super sharp gas pain for like an instant? And you're like "Thank god that only lasted an instant!" It was like that but for a solid 30 minutes. I was literally crying out in pain. Only time that's ever happened in my life, and I've felt some pretty painful shit, both literally and figuratively.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 10:22 PM
5

A colonoscopy is literally like Japanese tentacle porn, except the tentacles also blow air into your bowels, which you have to fart out, literally supernatural farts, while there is an entire team of people in the room with you, including female nurses who are your age.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 01:38 AM
68

I fucking hate simps. Before I quit looking at porn a few years ago, I would go on those free cam sites and the dudes who comment were the cringiest shit ever. I also lived with a cam girl for two months. She wasn't camming when I lived there. But it was one of the worst times of my life. I cannot believe there are guys out there wishing they had a chance with her or whatever and giving her money because she was just an awful person to be around. Women are not your fantasies of them.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 11:19 PM
4

White men are killed at a much higher rate than black women, higher than the difference between white men and black men. And the difference between white women and black women is like nothing compared to the difference between white men and black women. https://www.pnas.org/cms/10.1073/pnas.1821204116/asset/d3382386-187d-4858-90ea-957d67f0c18c/assets/graphic/pnas.1821204116fig01.jpeg
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:15 PM
17

Of course because all the "rewards" were just carrots on a stick to get men to do shit no one would have done otherwise. They started believing their own bullshit. "Wait, you mean work is hard?!?!" These are the type of people who complain that women weren't "allowed" to go to war.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:04 AM
2

same reason the entire site is heavily censored and moderated https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGBxUNaQI1I
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:57 AM
3

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/210/119/9b3.png
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:36 AM
2

Or people being sucker punched. They will interpret two people of exactly the same size being punched in the face and knocked out as fundamentally different if the sexes are different. I bet people would be more aghast at a 150 pound professional female fighter being sucker punched by a 130 pound man than a 130 pound man sucker punched by a 180 pound man. I'd love to see a study where they measured the brain activity response to seeing those things.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:25 PM
32

Some day people will realize men are people too.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 09:11 PM
52

It's not even not being some fantasy dream entity. It's being exactly what she wanted, which, it turns out, isn't actually attractive to her. Women domesticate men, and then become attracted to other undomesticated men. And I don't even mean some pussy-whipped, spineless slime. I just mean not off on your own being your own man. Like "Why aren't you an adventuring, world-traveling, ladies man? You loser." Oh, I don't know, maybe because I was fucking dating you since I was a teenager. At one poi…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:52 PM
5

I bet that's not what he said.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:32 PM
10

MRAs had a negative public image long before he was famous.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:30 PM
17

hate his podcast I think his podcast can be pretty good sometimes. He usually takes a back seat to the guest and asks pretty good questions. Episodes that stand out to me are Lawrence Krauss, not to be confused with JP on Krauss's podcast, and one with some animal behaviorist who worked with Jane Gooddall.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:28 PM
26

Misogyny = any criticism of any woman for any reason. Women are literal royalty to people. I would assume it was inherent to humans if it weren't for examples like the middle east. Case in point, there was a thread on r/climbing where someone said this female climber looked like she was on PEDs: https://64.media.tumblr.com/ead3caf4fb6f62d580536f5f2bbd36a4/60a0814255591161-28/s1280x1920/92314ba2e1d5a059e1531a1dd7e1117069f9f4f0.jpg It was met with many cries of "Oh my god! How could you!?! Misogyn…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:39 PM
9

As if a dude who has fathered children with multiple women hasn't gotten any.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 03:00 AM
13

Wait until she decides the idea of being with someone for the rest of her life sounds boring and and scary and that you're completely worthless to her.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:32 PM
8

It has its own wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama_tan_suit_controversy
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:50 AM
31

Obama was criticized for wearing a tan suit. Howard Dead was criticized for saying "Yeahh!" enthusiastically. People have judged male politicians for having smoked weed a single time in the distant past. The standards for heads of state has always been extremely high. It's like most people are unable to evaluate evidence and come to their own conclusions. They just have a worldview that's been given to them and the only thing evidence is good for is confirming that worldview. Everything else jus…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:54 PM
3

Anytime a man feels some way a woman doesn't want him to feel, she can just attack it as fragile masculinity.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 05:50 AM
8

and cat urine
/r/MensRights16/08/22 11:06 PM
5

the average person is average? who knew!?!
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:42 PM
4

Yeah, I was gonna say "and if her business fails she can just marry a man who has a successful one" but decided it sounded sexist, although probably does have an element of reality.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 06:50 PM
16

It's probably because men risk their entire worth to society on their businesses because if it fails the man is reduced to nothing. It's a man's attempt at satisfying the lower, important levels of Maslow's hierarchy. Whereas, starting a business as a woman is just a fun venture for her to fill in the very top level of the hierarchy, self actualization, because if her business fails, she still has her value as a woman.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 03:55 PM
1

because society hasn't realized men are people yet - "people" in the sense that we possess the same "soul" as women and children.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 02:48 AM
5

That the Salem Witch Trials is used as evidence of anything should be an indication of just how reaching an ideology feminism actually is. It's complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:43 PM
1

I'm also not saying it's not about evolution. I'm just saying that's not what I was focusing on. That would be an even higher level of laws. Obviously, human nature is the result of evolution and we're talking, in part, about human nature. Does this new container just happen to like women more by random chance? The "container" is the environment in which a society (or part of society) finds itself. In this case the "new container" is the post industrial/technological revolution where safety is l…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:12 PM
2

I'm speculating that need fulfillment is an end in itself and that society will reshape itself in order to maximize need fulfillment for its members. Perhaps need fulfillment is secondary to an even greater law. Maybe an evolutionary analogy was a bad choice because I'm not actually talking about evolution or the fitness of a society or the fitness of individuals in the society. I'm just using it as an analogy in order to illustrate the point about different levels of abstraction and different l…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 07:51 PM
3

It's easier for me to explain in terms of the evolution analogy. It's like for millions of years the eye evolved towards becoming better at serving the function of sight. It went from a very primitive thing that afforded very little in the way of sight, to a really complex thing that was capable of very precise and detailed sight. I'm not saying society was evolving or anything like that. I'm just saying in the evolution of the eye, there was a trend. And, if we knew nothing about the way evolut…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 07:26 PM
1

This really has nothing to do with labels. I'm talking about the forces that shape society and whether those forces have changed over the past couple hundred years. I'm saying they haven't. I'm saying feminism is an expression of values that have always existed and been fundamental in shaping society, not anything new.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 06:39 PM
2

Yeah, but I'm saying it was in control before it even existed as "feminism."
/r/MensRights13/07/21 06:21 PM
2

Yes, because what you're thinking of as traditional values were secondary to another set of even more traditional values. It's like the evolution of the eye analogy. You're saying traditional values are "improve the eye!" I'm saying traditional values are "improve fitness!" (even if it's at the cost of the eye). So you would think the devolution of the eye in cave dwelling animals would be a break with the tradition of improving the eye, but I would see it as more of the same (maximizing fitness…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 06:15 PM
2

I was using conservative in a different sense, not Conservative.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 06:10 PM
6

and the few before that
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:58 PM
7

become?
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:58 PM
1

have her read The Myth of Male Power
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:57 PM
1

Seems like a stone age concern.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 05:18 PM
2

The whole "women and children" is infantilizing to women is a typical feminist talking point. I get that it sort of overlaps with your MRA concerns, but that's just incidental. They think it's "women and children" not because those are the lives that society actually values, not because society doesn't give a shit if men die and expects them to, but because society sees women as children.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 05:15 PM
0

Yeah, dude, kittens=humans. That's what I was saying.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 05:58 PM
0

The vast majority of kittens are cute and their cuteness doesn't depend on some comparison with other non-cute kittens.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 12:40 AM
2

Until we achieve precision genetic engineering or neural implants there will never be a large society where the majority of people are not judging others by their appearance and other superficial qualities, imo.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 09:22 PM
2

Some people actually are ugly. Some people know they're ugly. In my opinion you're a better friend when you acknowledge someone's reality, and not doing so can almost seem like a wall between you and someone else. Like, if someone is dying, pretending everything is gonna be okay just serves to distance yourself from them, that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 09:07 PM
5

If everyone is beautiful. No one is. If every kitten is cute, then none are. But wait...
/r/MensRights16/05/21 09:03 PM
1

How are the two even remotely comparable?
/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:50 AM
0

Anyone notice that all different types of people call women "females" but it's only when a certain type of man uses the word that it's "eww, creepy, dehumanizing, etc?" Anyway, not a criticism of OP.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 08:44 PM
1

They are? Then why are they wearing it then? because most dudes would rather fuck a girl who looks like a 9 because she's wearing makeup, knowing she looks like a 4 without it, than that girl looking like a 4 without makeup. any other extremely basic facts you need me to explain to you? They don't affect the physical act as such, that's the same: sex. No, one there is a physical barrier and the other there isn't. It changes the physical nature of the act, as I said. Denying that fact doesn't mak…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 08:10 AM
1

The difference is that people wearing makeup aren't targeting people dumb enough to think that's how they actually look. They're targeting the vast majority of people who simply don't give a shit that they look worse without makeup. I guess I would draw the line at a dude lying about wearing a condom and not wearing one, which I don't think is the same as a woman lying about being on birth control. In the birth control case, I'd say that the dude should be off the hook for child support and mayb…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:03 AM
1

But you know you don't know. Therefore there's nothing deceptive going on.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 06:16 AM
-2

Well, see, when a woman puts makeup on, that's not what she actually looks like. So, the use of makeup doesn't deceive me because I know this.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:43 AM
51

my sister got her masters in social work, and when she graduated one of the speakers said something about how everyone went into social work knowing that social workers don't make much money. the class was like 85-95% women. another speaker (who was ironically a multimillionaire female CEO) made a speech about the gender pay gap
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:01 AM
-11

Yeah, I guess I just didn't realize how many guys don't understand how makeup works.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:46 AM
-10

Really? So if you have plastic surgery you don't actually look the way you look?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:16 AM
-12

both of those are deceptions not really
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:58 AM
6

Oh, okay, I guess another disadvantage of being a woman was not being allowed to have your picture taken while you were working the mines.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 04:00 AM
5

You can't extrapolate anything about the treatment of women in general over hundreds of years from the treatment of a few women by a homicidal king. He had an estimated 57,000 people executed. Here's a woman who was executed by Catherine the Great: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Hamilton_(lady_in_waiting) This says more about how royalty were able to treat non-royalty than it does about how women in general were treated compared with men in general. You ll see for a fact that women and child…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 02:38 AM
9

Oh, did Christian societies expect women to be be mowed down by machine guns at 18 years old? Did they expect female children to work at coal mines and die of black lung? Did they expect over a hundred thousands women to die in coal mines? Did they send women to jail for not taking care of their family? Well, actually, when you don't take into account all the worst shit that happened to men, and instead focus on 20th century luxuries like some vague sense of independence and job satisfaction the…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 02:10 AM
5

The more I cherry pick examples, the easier it is to make whatever case I want.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 12:08 AM
1

There is tons of indoctrination. Oftentimes starting from single mothers I'm not sure you can prove one way or another that any of that stuff isn't merely an expression of our nature, or again, a type of strengthening. There are plenty of examples of cultural elements working to strengthen innate drives. Just look at motivational material. There are counter examples through history that prove there is not a strong innate inclination Those examples don't prove anything other than that if there is…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 06:15 AM
2

What sort of indoctrination and at what point in our history do you think we became more empathetic toward women? What you might be calling indoctrination might be exploitation of what's already there. For instance, people naturally have an in-group preference and are wary of outsiders, but in certain circumstances a ton of effort goes into strengthening those innate tendencies through propaganda or whatever in order to achieve some sort of end.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 05:30 AM
4

But they do that because already give more of a shit about the dead woman, not because they have some sort of pro-female agenda. So it is something the public has chosen.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 02:15 AM
4

instinctually
/r/MensRights17/10/20 10:34 PM
11

I mean, you have to admit that that's a pretty exceptional attitude she has.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:24 PM
27

Why? Don't you think most people naturally have more empathy for women than they do men? Likewise, people generally have more empathy for kids than they do adults, so you'll hear about shit that happens to kids when you wouldn't hear about it if it happened to an adult.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:22 PM
2

I'm not really expecting anything to come of it.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 01:37 AM
2

Should attempted murderers get the death penalty? What about people who conspire to commit murder?
/r/MensRights05/09/20 12:48 AM
6

Hey. I got an angry message on Okcupid today about mainsplaining. Thank you for providing me an explanation of what I study.Very interesting way of mans playing.Of course, since you have a dick, this obviously privileges you with the right and the knowledge to explain me in "simple words" of things that I have been studying for years.Thank you for your enlightening i ntro, and now go to fuck off Literally just sent a friendly message with some brief thoughts about a subject that she had briefly …
/r/MensRights04/09/20 09:48 PM
25

Some first world feminist using female genital mutilation to legitimize their movement is like me using Amazonian rite of passage ceremonies to justify mine.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 09:29 PM
32

So many grievances are things people assume only happen to them when they really happen to everybody.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 06:13 AM
5

I don't get it. She seems cool.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 09:08 PM
6

But I guess I must be the minority yes
/r/MensRights07/06/20 05:04 AM
21

https://cdnb.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/007/361/831/large/bruno-furlani-test-le-bon.jpg?1505608854 there's the original. personally, i know lots of dudes whose forearms are bigger than their heads
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:43 AM
4

I bet kids would like it if you gave them heroin too.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 05:25 AM
4

my guess is they were bringing up some old law (in order to prove patriarchy or whatever) where a woman/wife was unable to open a credit card without her husband cosigning, whereas the man could open one without his wife's signature. something like that.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 06:32 PM
3

She's American.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:53 AM
31

https://s26162.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/miners1.jpg
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:37 AM
6

Not everything is incels.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:29 PM
5

Girl did this to my friend. He wasn't even gonna take her to court until my other friend talked him into it. I bet this is way more common than you'd think.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 09:13 PM
9

They sound exactly like them. Every single argument that's made in favor of circumcision is made in favor of FGM.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 07:24 PM
1

Janice Fiamengo just did a good video about this.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:19 PM
1

at this point, you'd think all people who agree that the earth is round, but here we are
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:56 AM
2

I thought you didn't get it.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 11:08 PM
3

What are you comparing your experience to?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 10:49 PM
17

but their jeans don't have pockets!
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:08 AM
3

Of course. He'd be called "controlling" for even suggesting that she not talk to her mother. OP is straight up forbidding that guy from talking to his own mother about what might very well be a tragedy for him and people are acting like that's fine. It's a fucking joke. The double standards are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 12:10 AM
9

Yeah, that thread is fucking infuriating.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 11:17 PM
1

This isn't a meme.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 10:17 PM
9

Some girl broke a bottle over my friend's head, causing a large gash on his forehead, and he wasn't even going to press charges until my other friend talked him into it. Then, I brought this story up in some main reddit thread and redditors were unwilling to believe it even happened. Their worldview can't accommodate real happenings, but they still think they're right.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 06:12 PM
38

i mean you're retarded if you actually believe this
/r/MGTOW02/03/20 03:49 AM
1

What if your friend was responsible for knowingly giving you the kidney disease? Do you think he should still be allowed to refuse donation on account of bodily autonomy? What about this scenario? Imagine a world where newborns can only survive on their own mother's milk. That's it. There's no work around. Do you think the mother's in this scenario would have the right to not feed their babies?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 09:53 PM
6

My therapist was pretty cool. She was a middle aged lesbian but was very compassionate when it came to men's issues. She would tell me about men like the OP describes. She still texts me with like studies and articles on mental health even though I'm no longer a client.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 04:55 AM
1

no, they were child rapists
/r/MensRights13/02/20 08:35 PM
57

and for anyone who doesn't get the reference: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." -Hillary Clinton https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-victims-of-war/
/r/MensRights11/02/20 08:51 PM
13

man bad
/r/MensRights08/02/20 10:29 PM
2

No, she will beat some untrained men. That's what I said - most untrained men of average size is some untrained men. I've automatically disqualified men who are bigger than average from the discussion because I could see them giving her trouble. And she's a top fighter and mostly male at this point. Yeah, the subject of discussion. But trained vs untrained is unfair. No kidding. A trained 60k bjj black belt will demolish a 150kg weight lifter. No, that's ridiculous, provided we're talking about …
/r/MensRights07/02/20 11:10 PM
3

I found it strange as well. Maybe she was in it for the status rather than just the money. Maybe she's just that confident in her gold digging ability that she knows she can always get other guys to pay for all her shit without needing to horde her own money. I knew she was a status chaser only knowing about her that she was married to Johnny Depp and dated Elon Musk
/r/MensRights07/02/20 10:20 PM
5

her gold digging career
/r/MensRights07/02/20 09:27 PM
2

The thing is, the study isn't just trying to prove that men are stronger than women, or even stronger punchers than women. It's specifically trying to prove that there is a greater disparity between men and women when it comes to punching than when it comes to other tests of strength. That's why they use pulling as a control. I'm certain the men were stronger pullers than the women. It's just that there wasn't as much disparity when it came to pulling. So, yes, men and women do not have equal am…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 08:49 PM
1

Rhonda Rousy would demolish most untrained men of average size.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 08:09 PM
4

This study sucks. They used seated arm cranking as a proxy for punching power. Meanwhile, punching is something done while standing, utilizing the larger muscles of the legs and core to generate power, muscles which are more proportionately developed in women as compared to men than the pushing muscles of the upper body. Not that I think women are even close to men in strength or punching power. It just bothers me how stupid this study is. And how can they prove it has implications into sexual s…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 07:40 PM
1

Beyond Good and Evil
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:04 PM
19

remember the chick who blew a passed out dude then accused him of sexual assault because she was drunk when she did it? i think she might have even gotten him expelled. yep: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/man-receives-sex-act-while-blacked-out-gets-accused-of-sexual-assault
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:57 AM
12

omg, lol, lmao, i didn't like know this was such a thing people felt strongly about, like babies are dying and losing their genitals, omg, lol, i mean i guess
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:52 AM
3

shocking. i expected so much more from "yung gravy" fans
/r/MensRights23/01/20 06:11 AM
5

You think it's gross because you're not used to it. If you had it, you'd be used to it, thus wouldn't think it was gross. You realize most of the planet think circumcised penises are gross, right? They look dried up and irritated to people who are used to the way nature intended penises to look. You gotta hold yourself to a higher standard of thought quality, my man.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:57 PM
1

Definitely agree with you, and everyone should keep this in mind. Lot's of groups that focus on some sort of "enemy" fall into this trap of delusions and loss of perspective. Go read any support group devoted to talking about narcissistic personality disordered ex-partners. Many of the people are clearly nuts.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 07:26 PM
57

this is the lamest fucking attitude
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:43 AM
2

i wouldn't take anything from that sub at all seriously
/r/MensRights17/01/20 08:56 PM
1

I completely agree. I also don't see her as having a position of power. If anything, he had way more power over her, given that her life and career were on the line. What was on the line for him, his volleyball grade? This is not rape. What's next, considering it rape one person is smarter than the other?
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:53 PM
51

four children
/r/MensRights16/01/20 08:38 AM
3

it means that if they don't pay their employees, they will get away with it seriously, my ex-gf worked for a husband and wife owned bakery, they got a divorce, the wife kept the business, and she just didn't pay my ex for like 3 weeks. my ex never got the money she was owed, thousands of dollars. she had a case filed against the owner, and was basically told "no judge is going to take a single mother's money" or something along those lines. my ex was in a way worse position financially than this…
/r/MensRights15/01/20 08:06 PM
2

exactly. it's why they're called life "partners."
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:42 PM
3

I think the majority of men probably don't give a shit, but I'm sure there are a few. Like, I have a friend from Cameroon who has very traditional views towards women, and I can imagine him feeling that way. But I'm certain the rest of my friends wouldn't give a shit. I don't give a shit. I might even prefer it.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 08:44 PM
8

this is her defining herself as "strong independent woman" then writing an article justifying the behaviors that lead to all her previous partners leaving her because she was just no fun to be around and took her career more importantly than actually living life. which is fine, but a lot of people don't want to approach life in that way. i would understand if a woman didn't want to be with a career obsessed man. "no, it wasn't because all i cared about was my career and I spoke to him only in le…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 08:01 PM
6

unless there happens to be a life-threatening situation outside of the room
/r/MensRights13/01/20 11:40 PM
2

punchable face
/r/MensRights13/01/20 07:22 PM
9

Yes. If parents are dumb enough to let people perform unnecessary genital surgery on their infants then they should not be allowed to make those sorts of decisions. Do you have a problem with tHe gOvErNmEnT telling parents they can't ritually nick their infant daughter's clitorises? I'm sure there are some out there who would want to.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:07 AM
7

Do you have foreskin?
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:03 AM
14

Yeah, I'm sure that a newborn infant understands that it's completely medical in nature, totally safe, and non-sexual as it's being strapped down to a board against its will and having its genitals tortured and dissected. tRy aGaIn
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:03 AM
12

famous last words
/r/MensRights11/01/20 07:22 PM
3

But in choosing bone cancer pain, you're specifically choosing something that's so extreme that it falls outside the realm of normal human experience. And, if it isn't that extreme, then yes, you could understand what it's like for all intents and purposes. You might not know exactly what it's like, but so what? That's not usually what people mean by "understand what something is like." Period cramps aren't bone cancer pain or chemo.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:16 PM
2

Kind of like men can never understand period cramps because they don’t have the equipment necessary to get those cramps. I feel like after 1000 different kinds of pain, you can get a pretty good idea of what it might be like. Likewise, I don't think it's that hard for a woman to get pretty close to the mark of what the issue is with circumcision. Acting like no one can understand what other people experience is some of the dumbest shit people believe.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:05 PM
8

I wanted to have my baby's ear lobes removed (first of all, they look gross, second of all, it's just a flap of skin) and the hospital wouldn't cover it - wtf!
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:03 PM
5

War isn't an act of men. It's an act of society, which is made of up men and women. Its carried out by men, but so what?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:58 PM
35

"gross looking" = doesn't look like mine How are people so stupid that they don't realize their opinion has nothing to do with objective aesthetics and everything to do with what they are used to seeing? There are so many of them too.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:41 AM
2

she seems like the good guy in that story to me
/r/MensRights08/01/20 02:26 AM
2

Yeah, I mean, if I don't care when it happens to me then I'm not gonna care when it happens to you.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:32 PM
13

too hard for an adult woman to witness; perfectly fine for a newborn boy to experience
/r/MensRights04/01/20 04:55 PM
5

This happened to me numerous times in my previous relationship, and not just when she was drunk. She simply did not value my "no" whatsoever. I would also say "no means no" and it would always come off as a joke with absolutely no power, like it were only meaningful coming from a woman. I, too, was not traumatized or anything like that.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:41 PM
4

no. hardwired.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:29 PM
1

That's an assumption. Newborns are conscious and have the experience of the surgery (which is itself a cognitive impact), whereas people under anesthesia do not experience anything. You don't know enough about the infant brain to say what kind of lasting impact the experience has. It's completely possible that they remember the experience but in some vague emotional way rather than conceptually, so that by the time they know what a memory is, they no longer recognize it as a memory. There's just…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 08:18 PM
2

Why would it have the same impact cognitively? I feel like there would be an enormous cognitive difference between being awake for surgery and being anesthetized.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 01:11 AM
4

Is remembering something that happened when you were 6 or 7 painful or something? I had painful surgery last year. I can't feel it now. So what if you can or can't remember it? How do you know that the actual experience wasn't infinitely more terrifying and traumatic when it happened to you as a newborn and didn't affect the entire course of your life? https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage https://www.ahomewithin.org/starting-at-the-b…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 09:05 PM
27

Why? Do you actually think that something that would be traumatic for an older person wouldn't be traumatic for an infant? Since when are infants tough? It seems like it would be the complete opposite. I seem to have gotten tougher and tougher as I've gotten older. Does the pattern suddenly reverse when we're talking about a newborn infant? Do you think the experience didn't exist because you don't remember it? It did exist and it was probably excruciating and terrifying, and probably reverberat…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 08:46 PM
8

Child custody issues and things like that are good issues for MensRights. Dude. I'm divorced and didn't have any child custody issues. I don't see what the big deal is. People should get a life. It's just dumb.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 06:54 AM
1

it might just be the cultural and social environment that has prevented women from making names for themselves Because society is so encouraging to men who want to become professional dart players. Newsflash! No one gives a fuck. And even when there is pressure, men don't give a shit. Take rollerblading for example. There's a lot of cultural and social pressure for men to not rollerblade. It's universally scorned and lampooned. "What's the hardest thing about rollerblading? Telling your parents …
/r/MensRights20/12/19 12:27 AM
5

*a psychologist who happens to be world renowned
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:27 AM
1

Yeah! Why doesn't this 16 year old girl have the solution to climate change? I mean, could she be any more worthless?!?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter