TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sphuranto Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by sphuranto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Where did I say that? That I can choose to think, learn, and assert values is of course relevant to my sexual selection. But all of it remains governed by standard evolutionary dynamics. Here is what I take you to be saying: there is something in the cultural or cognitive sophistication we as a species have achieved that lifts us out of the realm of mere animals. We (admittedly women more than men, but it is true of both sexes) are aroused and motivated sexually by abstract or esoteric character…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 02:20 AM
1

...you've missed my entire point. Trans women are a red herring; nobody is claiming (well, I'm not) that "actual trans women" are assaulting anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 12:39 AM
1

"Genuinely" attractive, as opposed to attractive, but it doesn't count because it's not genuine? What is counterfeit attractiveness supposed to be? Women are attracted to all sorts of things other than physical features. This has long been known and evident. The most desirable men on the planet are not male supermodels.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 10:54 PM
2

Your construction of 'consistency' is arbitrary, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 10:38 PM
1

there is a difference between a man just saying they are a woman now, and a transgender person (...) men don’t need to claim to be trans to rape women in bathrooms. Men didn’t have to wait for the trans debates to start harassing women in women only spaces. Men have never needed to lie in order to assault women. They just did it. And they will continue to do so. If you’re an assaulter, you’re an assaulter, you don’t need an excuse. The only thing of possible interest here is that there is no dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 10:36 PM
0

It doesn't make sense at all. You're complaining that you need to exert effort because you are (presumably) not attractive, by which you mean physically attractive. But you're also presumably not anything else that would be attractive either, so going on about looks is a red herring. Then why are you here? In this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 10:29 PM
2

Those are the sorts of determinations which affect whether or not they "like your looks", if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:53 PM
23

Obviously, if someone were contending that black people were entitled to the sexual companionship of white people, as opposed to seeking the legal right to marry white people who wanted to marry them back...?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:52 PM
1

That doesn't make any sense at all as a response, unless you also possess highly desirable other traits you're inexplicably neglecting to mention. I have no idea what you're even attempting to benchmark on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:25 PM
1

Bezos vs William is an example, not the thesis. The Crown isn't entirely ceremonial, although modern monarchs have elected to not exercise their prerogative powers. Elizabeth II rendered the Crown essentially purely ceremonial by convention; that was her signature accomplishment. The remaining prerogative powers of interest are exercised, but on binding advice. Bezos and the like can't stop an entire nation's productivity to celebrate their wedding or other personal festivities. Neither can Will…
/r/RedPillWomen11/09/23 08:04 PM
2

Yes, in comparison to looks, and, as I said, overwhelmingly so as you move up the food chain. I sometimes wonder what planet redditors inhabit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 06:41 PM
1

Women do "reward men" for all sorts of things other than looks, and overwhelmingly so as you move up the food chain. It seems... patently deranged to suggest otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 06:30 PM
2

I don't know off the top of my head what the best introductory piece would be, but Plomin & von Stumm's 2018 review is probably a decent place to start. Kathryn Paige Harden's The Genetic Lottery is a popular monograph by one of the leading figures in the field; she also personally has a fair bit of commentary on Twitter (X?).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 06:20 PM
3

No, I don't mean prostitutes - I mean the general body of women in the workforce. In the US, by BLS data, women hold about as many ordinary jobs as men do, and have for years (held slightly more in late 2019-2020, even), for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 06:02 PM
3

What do you think professional women do?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 03:15 PM
2

In what sense is William more powerful than Zuckerberg or Bezos? That's a completely baffling claim. Prince Mohammed bin Salman had Bezos' phone hacked and suffered zero consequences Is this supposed to be evidence of something relevant to the William v. Bezos/Zuckerberg comparison?
/r/RedPillWomen11/09/23 10:16 AM
1

It doesn't seem like cope, so much as a statement of the obvious, which (pace OP) becomes truer as SES increases. Education, preferably elite education, is just table stakes beyond a certain point. It has nothing to do with sexual attractiveness.
/r/RedPillWomen11/09/23 10:13 AM
1

What's ironic is that the actual rich, the ones who don't really have to work or worry about maintaining their lifestyles or their social status, don't care if you're a waitress at Denny's versus a lawyer at a prestigious firm - because he's on such a different level that you're all the same to him anyway. This is generally speaking not true.
/r/RedPillWomen11/09/23 10:09 AM
4

Are you genuinely under the impression that paternity fraud is massively pervasive/the default?
/r/AllPillDebate11/09/23 09:56 AM
1

If you look at history, dating strategy has indeed destroyed whole civilizations at an apocalyptic level. Which ones did you have in mind? There is a dynamic here. Sure, women are more selective, but men have leverage on other things like, you know, actually doing useful things and keeping infrastructure. The problem is that this leverage is not obvious for dating, so consequences of disenfranchising those men come when it is too late to fix the situation. What? Men do useful things for compensa…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 09:52 AM
1

But that's not shit at all - it's blindingly obvious, given the numerous nonphysical traits that mediate female attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 09:44 AM
3

I'm aware that you specified genetic heritability, but even that is well-supported and not especially controversial for intelligence. That isn't incompatible with there existing numerous environmental influences that can profoundly deleteriously affect IQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 09:09 AM
2

Which rights are these? Women's suffrage certainly doesn't qualify, as women never had the franchise in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 09:03 AM
2

In many cases, yes, for some meaningful and interesting concept of choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 09:02 AM
3

This assumes a high genetic heritability component of intelligence which is-at best- a tenuous hypothesis. Not particularly?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 09:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter