TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

spiral-staircase Archive

View 7 posts and 180 comments by spiral-staircase on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I don't think older women are necessarily more unattractive than older men but they feel it more because of their passive role in the dating game. So they practically become invisible because barely any men approach them but for single men the game stays the same because the result depends on their own actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/17 02:56 AM
25

Imagine just how much of women's needs depends on the kindness of men. You would think they'd be more grateful and sympathetic in return but nope.
/r/MGTOW11/12/17 07:22 PM
3

I consider anything over a hundred to be a high n count. Why? Because I can. Sure, you can. But that's a tragically low standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 09:28 PM
6

You must be old.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 09:14 PM
2

Your argument completely overlooks that some students are simply more talented than others, and can be more productive within the same timeframe as other students. Not every student needs obsessive studying to produce those grades, I'd actually argue those students cramming are a minority. In reality top students have more effective studying methods which improves their retention and understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 07:32 PM
10

I don't like it. I can't fathom how anyone could stand the love of their life fucking someone else. I know that's self-centered. But I'd rather love within true bond formed between a man and a woman, than focusing on sexual affinity and urges. I think the poly-amorous nature would work well for frivolous and casual relationships. I have a theory that these kind of relationship model is mainstream with highly sexually active people. Sharing a partner takes a strong ego and comfort when it comes t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 12:49 PM
7

I thought you were kidding, but he also made a thread about....penis size.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:25 PM
10

I think your post spot-on, especially towards the last paragraph. If all you want to do is fuck make that clear up front, don't be deceptive. It's a little funny so many "sex positive" people that I hear this kind of rhetoric from have a real problem with guys who want sex (even if it's under the pretense of friendship). To my eyes for it to be considered deceitful there would have to be the prerequisite, mainly that they do not like the girl at all except for their sexual appeal. Which is very …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 06:18 PM
13

I agree with the intention of your argument, but disagree with intentionally replacing all the complexities of being a man with talk about penises. There are more attributes to both genders than our sexual organs. It's intellectually dishonest. Although I think OP should remain hopeful about herself, it's decidedly true that women make up a relatively small number in terms of inventors and scientific pioneers, but why should that stop her? There is no evidence that this seems unlikely to change.…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 11:45 PM
2

I'm a programmer developing for the web and iPhone related projects. I think I fit all the stereotypes when it comes to behavioral patterns, but in really extreme ways. I can only describe myself as a social outcast since I don't participate a great deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 04:01 AM
-1

It might not necessarily alter the visual aspect of their vagina, but it can turn some women into "size queens" for lack of a better term. I don't personally want to deal with practical issues because a woman is accustomed to a larger (or even smaller) penises. I agree though that sex doesn't change tightness or coloring. Some women are born too loose, some are too tight. It varies considerably.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/14 09:14 PM
1

Then the most alpha in society would be all those millionaires in Silicon Valley. That's absurd, and I really doubt anyone outside the tech community thinks of them as leaders or alpha. Perhaps alpha geeks. I believe Alpha is someone who naturally gets attention and respect from people, and especially women. There are many representations of an alpha in reality. But certainly they don't need intellect or good finances for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/14 08:19 PM
3

I can't remember the exact counts, but they were not monstrously huge or anything. The highest was my last ex who had roughly around 20 previous sex partners, most between 5-10 I guess. I found out through normal conversation, I never tried to force it but what really gave it away was moments of passion they would talk about what turns them on and that was a constant reminder they let men use their bodies who didn't value them for anything else. Which completely broke all these romantic thoughts…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/14 09:05 PM
5

I've had three ex-girlfriends who all had a higher count than me. I chose to dump them in the end, and partially because they lied. I can only describe the feeling as pure disgust, and this will sound harsh but I didn't see them any different from hookers. I was more than uncomfortable, needless to say. After those failures I decided to ask potential girlfriends early on to speed up the process. Eventually landed in a relationship with a virgin who ironically tried to hide it because it's so unu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/14 07:30 PM
-3

I'm sure they're subject to confirmation bias, just like yourself, but last I checked this is not /r/TheRedPill .
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 08:30 PM
-8

No, I'm saying it's pointless to use anecdotes as sufficient justification for your view of the topic. It's bad and useless evidence from a rational perspective, but hey, if you want to speak about your personal experience I think perhaps /r/relationships fits better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 08:10 PM
-5

Data with a sample size of 1 is useless though, and so is your contrarian anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 08:01 PM
4

This is exactly why the RP community dictates that its members should be careful about modern sensibilities when it comes to discussing red pill ideas, and behold people will agree, despite it being the same concepts. RP often talks about the "boss" persona, and how women love watching guys who take charge. You can definitely have that, that's pretty sexy. But there's no reason you need that and all of the other misogynist drama. It's not misogyny to have a lack of respect for women attracted to…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 07:46 PM
1

This "wall" phenomenon begun with articles about "where are all the good men?" written by older women having serious difficulties with dating and finding commitment. The truth is their decreased attractiveness means older women find themselves in an objectively worse position. Those articles would be the equivalent of a man living in his moms basement blaming women for their choices. Are they honestly worried that such women need to take advantage of their youth and beauty and marry as early as …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 02:16 PM
-5

all your thoughts are worthless
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:15 AM
33

"Another witness verified that the rape lie was the assailant's motivation for the stabbing." Because that was motive for the murder she should atleast be charged on incitement to murder.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:24 PM
1

I think you should stop focusing so much on gender, and you know, prove how she's objectively wrong. MR is a place we where we can speak frankly even if it may offend. But atleast attempt to make an argument before you start making unwarranted assumptions about everyone's critiques.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 09:41 PM
-2

I think you should shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:18 PM
0

redditor for 19 minutes. As if those two downvotes isn't you and your main account. Kinda sad man.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 11:42 PM
-1

As soon as one of you fucks up you come here making excuses. And yet have the fucking nerve to slander MensRights as misogynists on the basis of a few posters.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 10:06 PM
14

No, that's just trolls trolling. And you have been trolled.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 05:27 PM
1

Everyone has a bias towards their own ethnic group. If you look at dating sites in general, white women prefer white men.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 02:52 PM
4

It makes sense that the average white male is the most desired, in my experience having options proves that. Also, I wouldn't be worried about black women so much if I were you. Black men are the least likely of all men to marry interracially, while white women are the most likely of all women... mostly to hispanic men. Well black men have something like 11% incarceration rate, hard to navigate the dating pool from that kind of situation. What this is means is black women have fewer options and …
/r/MensRights22/10/11 02:42 PM
5

Last night I spent time with the type of man you could never hope to be. Incredibly handsome, successful, young (but older than me), bright, funny, and a gentleman. I think I'll show him this page later so that we can share a good laugh. :) Dude, you're completely delusional. Black girls are the least sought after women, not even black men are interested and go after other races (and this is not only my opinion, OKCupid's data pretty much reflects reality). And it didn't take long to see that od…
/r/MensRights22/10/11 02:05 PM
4

It's very obvious you're projecting your insecurities when you write a butthurt, defensive rant like that. You sound like you've been rejected by plenty of guys. Look, we're not interested in dating women who are ugly, fat, or have children. Especially not aging-ex-stripper-single-moms with bastard children and that's okay. Sometimes the truth is ugly.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 01:32 PM
7

It says he's in special classes. But considering the guy's life is about to be ruined who gives a shit whether he's not eloquent enough for you. Is writing ability more important than basic human rights?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:31 PM
4

What you've said here is obvious. I'm sorry but this scenario happens more than you'd like to admit and your appeal to emotion seems to have gotten the best of r/MR. Over 2/3rds of divorces are initiated by women. It's close to 70%. Where are these supposedly "supportive" wives?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 10:00 PM
3

I despise feminism because women are given legally the same rights as men and that's where it should end. Feminism's just the ideology for blaming other people for their mistakes and weaknesses.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:51 PM
1

You must be new to MensRights. It's more about discrediting the "women are victims, men are perpetrators" myth that is shoved in our face constantly.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:38 PM
2

She stalked and terrorised the guy?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:21 PM
6

Oh right, I alone am complaining about trolls so we can steer away from things I dislike. Is that why you made this thread?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:16 PM
5

How does trolling ever amount to legitimate discussion? I'm not saying ban every non-MRA, just get rid of the fucking constant trolls. This place has really gone to shit in the past couple months.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:46 PM
-5

Why don't you actually do your job?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:13 PM
0

the problem here is that "How would you even know?" So basically if it was a perfect transition? I wouldn't ofcourse but that wouldn't change my preference for women. Unless I happened to fall in love with the trans woman I guess. I think you should realise many of the guys here know nothing about trans-women (me included). Some might be more hateful but most I think just arbitrarily rule out anything other than typical females. Nothing wrong with the latter.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:02 PM
20

I just read an overview of vaginoplasty and it's the first time I've had my mind blown in a while. I didn't think it was that good.wow
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:45 PM
0

It's pathetic to claim women have been treated worse than men and ignoring this part of the equation. That's a little thing called misandry you stupid cunt.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 08:24 PM
7

I'm not particularly interested in whether women care. But there is decidedly enough evidence that men do when it comes to commitment. In reality marriage with a promiscuous woman essentially leads to failure.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 08:09 PM
1

Where did I speak for all circumcised men? You claimed I couldn't possible know what I'm missing and you were simply wrong. All your posts so far are predicated with baseless assumptions rooted in your own personal biases, and has nothing to do with the idea at hand. edit no one is saying the sensation dies over night. more baseless speculation... really?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 11:23 PM
-1

I've been circumcised for a little more than a year.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 10:52 PM
1

Seeing as I was uncut for twenty years I don't have to wonder what I'm missing. There is no real loss of sensation. Today I am happy with it, I don't miss anything. However I think it should be an individual's choice.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 10:45 PM
2

Personally I am against circumcision on the basis of rights, rather than a loss of sensitivity etc. Because I know plenty of guys have not suffered from those negative signs including me. It's a bit like equating phimosis with being intact. I'd rather not base my opinion on such a subjective aspect.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 08:44 PM
3

Gotta downvote you, man. Cool. FWIW that was a tongue-in-cheek comment. The solution is to set boundaries as to what you will tolerate, and not let a woman crap on you. That does not involve being an asshole or abusive. It involves setting boundaries as to what you will tolerate, and not letting a woman crap on you. A woman won't respect you if you let her crap on you, just like other men won't respect you if you let THEM crap on you. To bring up the obvious: What happened to just mutual respect…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:18 PM
-12

No, when a woman is not obeying or being patient it's completely acceptable.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:28 PM
5

I'm advising that solution to men who lack that domination women crave, atleast on a subconscious level. I doubt any more than a small subset of men will adapt those traits women look for(narcissistic, brutal, detached etc). That's why there's so many men without sexual activity despite women's sexual liberation. Women did not evolve to find "good" guys attractive.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:23 PM
1

To the issue that arises in that good men are essentially disposable to women.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:06 PM
-4

I thought it was a stereotype but it appears women are the major problem in relationships in this day and age. The solution is that good men need to grow a backbone and degrade, humiliate and damage women.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:20 PM
2

reason?
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:16 PM
3

Just to clarify that subreddit was an answer to r/againstmensrights and exposed feminist tendencies towards misandry. Even though both sides of the argument tend to annoy me, r/againstwomensrights position was entirely valid.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:53 PM
2

This is all true. Maybe I have too radical opinions on stuff. But you need to see the bigger picture of how it all comes together. First you must understand that things didn't change for the better, in truth they got worse for men. Movements like these are comprised of people who are upset with the system enough to take a stance and try to deal with it. Yes, there are men lashing out at women which could further alienate them. And for good reason. Why wouldn't men be dissatisfied with women's pr…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:34 AM
22

There's a popular theme on reddit that this is place is full of misogynists. When the truth is this subreddit has ideas feminists and most women won't understand. I tried to explain, like many other MRAs but it quickly grew tedious. I'm afraid there's a substantial amount of men and women out there that mock men's rights(r/againstmensrights) or completely feel offended. As I understand it if you want to defend Men's Rights, expect to be characterised as a whining misogynist-rape-apologist-NiceGu…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 10:18 PM
2

The problem is that social/demographic consequences of feminism also affects men in the sense that it is to blame for the low birthrate/high divorce rate. If we look at the evolution of "women's rights" we can see that it coincides with decreased fertility. Now that doesn't mean that the relationship is causal ("more rights caused lower fertility"), it may well be so that decreased fertility (agricultural to industrial transition) caused decreased fertility, which in turn caused more rights, as …
/r/MensRights05/10/11 07:04 PM
2

Right, but there is still an improvement even in a traditionalist setting, actually it would solve a few current problems too. I am aware not all of them and indeed it would be depressingly imbalanced for the opposite sex. Maybe it's the frustration that keeps growing inside me, but that sends a shock of schadenfreude down my spine. I assume being treated like a second-class human being will do that to you. Nobody here is under the impression that we're supporting both genders, it's too late for…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:52 PM
3

salty
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:34 PM
2

There's a name for that. i.e. apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:31 PM
1

u mad?
/r/MensRights02/10/11 01:37 PM
2

Women who seek short-term satisfaction are in reality a small minority and usually regret their sexual choice when they realise the high status, attractive men only wanted a pump and dump. In truth deep down they seek validation you see. Hence the "all men are pigs" meme when the guy doesn't bother putting in any effort beyond penis in vagina.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:17 PM
-2

It goes without saying the majority of women have casual sexual encounters in search of something more barring those with a sexual addiction/disorder. It's amusing irony they spend their 40s reflexively sobbing every time they read a romantic book while buried in cats.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:49 PM
0

My assertions were pointing out the effects of casual sex, not long term monogamous relationships. However 10 boyfriends depending on the time frame, I'd be duly disgusted at the definition of boyfriend.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:19 PM
2

Where do you think you are posting this?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:10 PM
0

My observation is that women who have casual sex have a way of not being able to get married, and many of them discover that it's something that they actually did want to do, eventually. It's funny. It simply doesn't make any sense to expect a 30-year-old woman to be a virgin! You're conflating women with multiple sex partners and women who have a lot of casual sex.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:06 PM
0

I was making the point that past immoral behaviour does effect the actual opinions of people. In any case, a guy who really takes issue with a number is not someone I want to date anyway. Yes, and that set of people includes 80% of men. Like someone else said I think promiscuous women face the same repulsion from the opposite sex just like male virgin's lack of social proof, sexyness etc.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:09 PM
0

I would say your [past] actions are a testament to your character. For example, I'm certain most of us here would avoid dating cheaters. But really there isn't a great variance in the opinions of guys when it comes to the "number". A woman with a high number is going to have trouble finding a long term relationship without effectively not disclosing or clouding (in your case) that information.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:46 PM
0

So, basically you hide the fact you were promiscuous?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:21 PM
1

Things like instant gratification, uninformed decisions and ignoring anything that takes a tad bit commitment. Eventually that behaviour makes it so that stable long-term relationships become harder to form. It's not a habit that people break easily. I've been in relationships with girls who had multiple partners who thought this way. I suggest to the guys here it's much wiser to date inexperienced girls who don't have poor judgement skills and who know a few things about loyalty. If I had known…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:03 PM
1

To me a slut is a person who has sex with bad or immoral motivations. It's not gendered. I don't happen to be interested in men though.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:50 PM
1

You're not bound to be anything. There are people with one partner who have them, and people with a hundred who never have. You may be right, but they're rare and in objective reality there's a much wider pool of people that have a lot of sex with health consequences. The rest is highly empirically questionable. Respectable is in the eye of the beholder, first of all. But there are plenty of people who are respectable by other measurements who sleep around, they aren't mutually exclusive. To be …
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:47 PM
0

That's my point. If you are having sex with many people you are bound to be a STD container and with the numbers involved, it's almost impossible to not have sex with people that are essentially strangers. In other words, promiscuity is not fine. And in truth, there are no respectable women who sleep around. I have no problem calling anyone who sleeps with 20+ people a slut.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:08 PM
1

Are you going to tell your daughter "know what? it's not a big deal if you sleep with every stranger as long as you're safe."
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:28 PM
1

Here's my take: promiscuity is not the same as polygamy and promiscuity is a thing that should not happen in a healthy society. Honestly, only sluts like to believe they're disparaged because of jealousy and not moral principles.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:02 PM
1

Fucking whores.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 08:23 PM
1

Back when women were generally forced to stay home, a house was pretty able to support a family on a single income. Today, it seems more and more that it takes 2 incomes to support a household. This is an ubiquitous example of social regression caused by feminism. Especially in the lower classes and poorer families. And this is exactly why I oppose the social and economic emancipation of women, what feminism considers the "right to work" is actually mandatory and it's why the consumerist movemen…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:20 PM
6

http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/whysofew.cfm The decline is particularly evidenced in Computer Science. More geeky the subject the more women are repelled.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 07:29 PM
9

I actually laughed. Is that why women's presence in the science/math/engineering fields has been declining despite women's "superiority"?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:37 PM
-6

It is pretty obvious there are mistakes rooted in women's suffrage or have resulted from it. Almost any kind of movement has good effects as well as bad effects. Stop the PC bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:11 PM
1

The idea of r/Masculism is so dumb I do not find the words.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:22 PM
5

I'm sick of being in opposition to what I see as being most feminists. Frankly, I think most are pretty egalitarian and are simply uninformed on men's issues. And like most people, when you tell them they're stupid, they clam up. The problem I have with feminists is more than just feminist theory. It's common to see on feminists on reddit claim MRAs don't respect women at all and don't value their contributions to society on any level. Ofcourse this is ludicrous. I think we have to take into acc…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:06 PM
0

Society is not doing that.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 04:17 PM
-1

You don't believe false rape accusers should be punished?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:09 AM
1

It's only natural feminists gravitate towards pseudo-sciences. After all a feminist is an intellectual antichrist.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:33 AM
-18

I also know a fair amount who claim rape because they had sex while drunk and regretted it. I would say that is expected from this generation of degenerates with a victim mentality. I hope that their future husbands beat them mercilessly.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 01:57 AM
0

I believe our dear little misandrist troll is stuck.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 12:02 AM
6

Actually an overwhelming majority of women in Iceland supported the measure, so I fail to see his point how it's misogyny. This is just what happens when women mess up politics (and the world).
/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:44 PM
-3

I find that women's emancipation was probably the worst development to civilization and to humanity at large. If you blend socially progressive and feminist you get decadent, emasculated societies like Iceland (and also Sweden, Norway etc).
/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:04 PM
-10

When is it OK to punch your wife? Whenever she's not being obedient or patient.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 09:35 PM
-1

Concern troll detected.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 09:32 PM
8

I think it should be noted that NSWATM was a feminist-compatible blog from the start. It basically sought to present men's issues from a feminist perspective under the guise of "Masculism". Can you please explain why you still chose to use the descriptor "masculism"? It's only ever been used as part of the feminist scope the way I see it.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 07:18 PM
6

But she said she did not believe it was a reflection of a change in society. She said: “People are more educated now. People now know that if they are in doubt about bringing up children that may not be theirs, they can get tested. I don’t think behaviour is any worse than it was.” I could rewrite this so it basically applies to any conceivable frame of discussion. It's a concrete example on the thinly veiled lack of empathy. You know what you'd never read in an article about rape? I don’t think…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 08:27 PM
4

You've never witnessed the stigma against virgins? I can't believe I have to say this but they don't exactly come on top when it comes to matters of dating.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 08:08 PM
6

If someone actually wants to shame us they would use creep because, at least in my experience, that's what our culture uses to shame men's sexuality. That's very weird to hear. I think the point is they're doing the same exact thing whether they use creep or virgin. I know for a fact certain prolific feminists like Amanda Marcotte, Hugo Schwyzer etc all recognise MRAs as either virgins or creeps to the extent where there isn't even a point in telling them apart. It always happens, just read a fe…
/r/MensRights17/09/11 07:33 PM
5

Regardless if she's a sociopath (which I very much doubt, sociopathy is a very vague concept anyway), it's largely just a function of that there's a good bit of misandry ingrained of all societies where feminism dominates. It's also a function of feminism's influence that sexism against men cannot exist. To make it simple: There is no sexism against men. Men who suffer from demands and pressures are considered a loser, manchild, whiny ("real men don't whine" or you must be misogynist, pedo a com…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:01 PM
4

In the OP's case what I got from the scenario is that we still have to reckon with attractiveness factoring in the moral judgements of women. It was never meant to be something that you'd read in a science journal with everything sourced.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 08:39 PM
5

What is controversial about this?
/r/MensRights08/09/11 05:45 PM
0

Also, I find your insinuation that it is somehow less than good to have as much sex as we desire amusing. I find it amusing you think not having sex is some sort of negative karma worthy of shaming men with. No, you were prick and the way you were a prick not only reflects badly on you but also on the rest of us men here. I guess my thoughts came over prickish. I don't care. I'm tired of all the non-productive comics and rants. It's probably telling you think involuntary celibate men are sociall…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 03:24 PM
-5

I'm a gay guy; I had more—and probably better—sex in high school than you will ever have in your life. And here I was thinking the stereotype of gays being sex-obsessed was untrue. I hope for your sake you didn't pick up any nasty illnesses ( I mean that sincerely!). You are being a prick to people that are reaching out to you and sympathizing. It makes you seem like a small, sad little troll. Also, that's not how successful movements are made. She claimed it was not relevant to men's rights. I …
/r/MensRights07/09/11 12:10 PM
-18

Oh yeah? Well actually my girl and I sleep with eachother, express that love personally and sometimes it ends in sucking me. It is a joyous thing. I guess I'm misogynistic. But I still get laid...you bitter?
/r/MensRights07/09/11 10:03 AM
-27

This particular post may not relate to mensrights You are correct in that assertion. Please keep your trivial shit on 2XC where it belongs.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 09:42 AM
5

Now that females have equal opportunities maybe we're just a little sore that on average they're a tad brighter than us. I can't really conceive of why you would think that it's balanced out education wise. Further I'm not from the US but there plenty of statistics that note boys are failing school. This is an effect of a dysfunctional school milieu because simply the local and state governments have more interest in dedicating time, effort and resources (feminised curriculum etc the list is end…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 06:49 PM
2

There's no such thing as a "bad" or "wrong" emotion.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 11:06 AM
-7

This is my take, since a woman's purpose is to bear children, to reproduce. And since humans reproduce sexually, a woman's primary purpose is sex. Not to think of advanced things, or do great deeds, go on lengthy expeditions, etc. A woman's purpose is to fuck. This is apparent physiologically in the fact that a woman is able to have much more sex than a man. So of course a woman is primarily a sex object. That is the purpose of her life. So if you go around pretending that women are people who a…
/r/MensRights03/09/11 10:21 AM
2

How is that his problem exactly?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 07:22 PM
2

No, I was born in the 90s :(
/r/MensRights01/09/11 07:11 PM
-1

I think she did you a favour if she isn't lying.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 09:07 AM
5

Most guys I know have been saying this for years. It is only feminists and entitled women who get seriously offended true equality.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 09:33 AM
2

Downvoted. Stop advertising for that schizophrenic.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:38 PM
1

We criticize Feminists for ignoring and amplifying issues affecting men, and at best focusing on one inequality over another inequality. Because of the fact most of this generation's women are raised feminists, it's hard to extract support for men's rights from women who live in times smothered with feminist fascism and the treatment of men ranges from bad to fucking horrendous.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:32 PM
8

Actually I think most of us would be okay with scrapping affirmative action for all persons. Not extending it to men. Come on, do we look like feminists to you?
/r/MensRights24/08/11 06:29 AM
2

Thanks for the tip.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 11:47 AM
2

I don't know whether it has affected gender relations. Looking at these facts is a hard thing to confront for women perhaps.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 12:18 AM
9

False Rape Society is a fairly loyal site to false rape accusations. See also here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape Here it's reported that most studies show up to 10% of rape accusations are false according to their statistics. Although the number is likely even higher when you include cases where subsequently charges are dropped or the accuser refuses to co-operate with the authorities.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 11:33 PM
2

That's not what he said. He actually stated there are more male geniuses and those with lower mental capabilities. I find this phenomenon true for other aspects such as our physical metrics. For instance if you contrast height statistics globally the difference in East Asian and European countries for males compared to females demonstrates a similar variance. Height difference inter-continentally between females is much lower as opposed to males.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:52 PM
7

Women != Feminists.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 12:57 AM
5

I don't care if they get abortions or not. They are free to do so. Most guys support abortions insofar it's legally and physically not their decision. However, the reality is feminists support forcing men to pay for children they didn't want and in some cases aren't even theirs, that is nonsense. I firmly believe what makes us different is not purely biological but also socially affected. The opposite has been the prevailing line of thought of feminists. There are some fine lines that separate c…
/r/MensRights08/08/11 12:50 AM
6

What's that hypothetical supposed to prove? You came to the conclusion you wanted by the premise that the guy is an irresponsible dick. That's not an argument that applies to daily life.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:45 PM
5

So you think in "the event of a failed contraceptive" women bear no responsibility at all, but men should be financially responsible?
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:26 PM
4

If you know children come from having sex and you don't wish to have one then isn't the obvious answer to just not have sex? This is a serious question. Do you feel the same about abortion? Serious question.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:21 PM
0

Avoid women.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 05:29 PM
4

CoonTown The irony is breathtaking.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 05:45 PM
2

I'm not saying it's right but if you got shot unarmed by police officers then it would make sense too.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 04:43 PM
-2

Best thing ever.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 10:28 PM
2

I'll just go ahead and say it: It would be surprising if it weren't written by a man.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:54 PM
2

Just curious, why is this asshole allowed to post here?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 07:55 PM
7

Who cares?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:32 AM
3

All you need now is an [phallic?] award!
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:45 PM
3

390? Not bad for two months.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:14 PM
13

What's worst of all is that they don't even have anything interesting to say. Their attempt to troll us into trolling ourselves is transparent. The solution is to not help them succeed by not shoving their trolling down our throats. We should filter any associated terms with that place. Let them have their "safe space" it's not even worth addressing a bunch of scared little girls.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:13 PM
1

Stop whining and stay out of their misandrist shithole.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:04 PM
12

All she's sorry for is getting too comfortable on television and exposing her true colours.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 07:50 PM
2

What double-standard? If the woman doesn't want to keep it she can have an abortion or set it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:10 AM
2

Should a man have to pay for a child? Sorry, but yes. Not for a child that isn't his or he didn't want. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:21 AM
7

Done.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 04:38 PM
3

He's given so much information I wouldn't be surprised if someone finds out who this Jill that's associated with him is and contacted Ted. I hope he's smart enough to use false pseudonyms.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:44 PM
2

How disappointing. Whatever happened to ranking accomplishments based on their scientific merits? This is a loss on Google's part and the sciences milieu if this behaviour persists. This is probably one of the more anti-intellectual things Google has ever done.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:54 PM
3

I wonder how long till feminists shut it down...
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:47 PM
7

I'm not surprised he defends cuckolding. Yeah, impregnating another man's wife is exactly what an alcoholic/drug addict would do. This is what it takes apparently to get on board with 'the good men project'.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:06 PM
5

How about just donating to 3rd world people? Stop making sense.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:54 AM
1

Yep, expect to do everything for them but when you want something in return you're an entitled asshole!
/r/MensRights03/07/11 11:13 PM
1

I agree with the majority of your post. But I wish it was void of feminist leanings. Any sane man wouldn't in be in favour of using the same ideology that identifies the system and does everything in its power to shame and ignore men through various forms of politics. It has reduced fathers to sperm donors and wallets. Our reality speaks for itself. Spewing vague, trendy nonsense filled with buzz words and obscurantist philosophy isn't going to convince anybody here.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 07:02 PM
4

You're a teenager, aren't you?
/r/MensRights20/06/11 01:16 PM
3

That subreddit is insignificant. Even their main feminist subreddit doesn't hold a candle to MR, they're not worth the attention.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 03:42 PM
2

Their definition of feminist is not offensive, in fact I would say it's complementary.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 04:24 PM
1

I think it probably got traction because as women gained rights and eventually advantages, equality for men doesn't seem to be relevant or even conjured. This is because of feminist policies, who oppress men and cause high divorce rates, low fertility and much more. It's not just tipping the balance the other way around, there's no balance to begin with. Maybe the feminists understand now sexism will always exist, but ofcourse when it's not effecting females they do not care for consequences.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 09:24 AM
-1

Good for you. Fag.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 06:12 PM
1

Okay?
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:28 PM
-1

You mad slut?
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:06 PM
-1

I don't give a damn what people wear. But I won't empathise with them if they get raped.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 02:14 PM
-1

No, a rapist doesn't care if you're wearing full veil or miniskirt. But you're not helping and attracting attention with skimpy clothes, get it?
/r/MensRights13/06/11 11:47 AM
-6

If you dress inappropriately you should have to face the consequences of it. That these women are allowed to demonstrate for such things shows the moral corruption of these nations.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 11:36 AM
-4

I don't care. They have already won, there is no point in courtesy.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:47 AM
-9

Women are stupid. News at 11.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 10:56 PM
2

That only applies when the kids in question are females.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 08:26 PM
5

That's an attempted murder if you ask me.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 01:29 AM
5

Actually, it would probably freak them out.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 09:24 PM
3

Terrifying, but why do you give this lunatic a podium and traffic?
/r/MensRights30/05/11 07:45 PM
5

You have to be exceedingly short-sighted and plain retarded to get married.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 07:19 PM
1

Can we get this on the sidebar after we gather more evidence?
/r/MensRights27/05/11 09:09 PM
72

There was not even any interaction. Wow.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 04:52 PM
1

Not much different from our culture, people now rather have sex with different partners than go the family route. [1] This study's numbers rings true with the famous paradox-that 80% of women are interested in 20% of men. [1] http://www.dailycomet.com/article/20110331/WIRE/110339901/1008?p=1&tc=pg&tc=ar
/r/MensRights13/05/11 10:46 PM
2

bitches be crazy seriously though, that's another story.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 06:59 PM
1

Now what I've observed is women generally want men who put them in their place, this is essentially what "challenging" means. The (illusion) of power is what women naturally, biologically desire to become "possessed" or "owned" or most simply speaking… "protected". It is a universal preference it seems. So why do women even feel resentful that men treat women like "sex-objects" because that, in-fact, is what women demand of men? Appearances in general matter more it is considered. a nice guy see…
/r/MensRights11/05/11 06:33 PM
3

Well, did you call out their repulsive behaviour?
/r/MensRights10/05/11 04:49 PM
3

Wrong. The "stupid women" posts reflect a bigger issues like the diminishing legal rights of men. At what point do false rape accusations for example start being more than something out of the ordinary? The FAQ is perfectly justified.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 04:00 PM
2

Has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 03:18 PM
1

I was born in the 90s actually. :3
/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:31 PM
2

I have started to wonder what the consequenses of feminism and equality will be. I'm reminded of Married with Children. Its a tv show sure but there you have an example of oppressed men who have an refugee camp where they can be complain about their wifes, yet when their wifes come and tells them to go home and massage their footwarts they do it, like slaves. No thanks.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:19 PM
1

This must be your first false rape accusation thread.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 07:14 PM
-1

Gender equality is suicidal to any society. It undermines a functioning stable family unit, and therefore undermines the sense of unity/singular culture with the declining birth rates. For a matter of practicality if nothing else, everyone has their place and limits, including the women. For every limit a man has, so does a woman. Men have lost many judicial rights due to (discriminatory) egalitarian laws. Those of us who are truly in support of men's rights recognise this.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:14 AM
-1

Hah. You didn't deny it.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:04 AM
2

The problem I have with feminists is that they are inherently feminists.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:54 AM
-1

You deny the power western women have? Where men can be beaten and arrested by a mere glance?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:49 AM
-3

That whole thread reflects the fact women don't really have a clue about responsibilities, sacrifices and burdens.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:47 AM
-7

Why is Feminism truly needed? Look around these threads and tell me how anyone who can manipulate society to that degree is oppressed? In politically correct Western culture we've given women far too many rights, they now act on the same level as men and this is not the natural order. Men have become increasingly feminized and subservient to women. Regrettably men need to put back into control, and women in their role as incubators.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:37 AM
3

There really are people who will defend anything. Fuck this world, I want to get off.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 05:56 PM
0

There's the door.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 06:22 PM
7

Why is it that the most radical feminists are those who have had the cushiest lives?
/r/MensRights03/05/11 05:36 PM
7

You're missing the point, the question is why are you so ardent to jump on the rape bandwagon? When to say you have a limited perspective is a gross understatement.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 04:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter