TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

spkygrrl Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by spkygrrl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Your experience isn’t everyone’s experience. Have you seriously never heard of “chubby chasers” for example? There are definitely people with niche interests. I would even say most people have some niche qualities they’re attracted to. No, my friend being attracted to bald men doesn’t make them more desirable to me or other women, but that’s something she would say in dating. “They are perfect/they’re a 10…” etc., the “…TO ME” is implied.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 11:56 PM
5

I mean, most people have multiple types they’re attracted to, some that are niche. I have an attractive female friend who, among liking other types of men, has a big thing for bald guys. Baldness is not objectively attractive. She doesn’t care. Bald men turn her on. So most people have both conventional and common qualities they’re attracted to as well as niche ones. Some people love having a fat partner. Some people love bizarre piercings and body mods. Etc. It doesn’t mean they would only date…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 01:29 PM
4

The average older man looking to date younger is far from Leo DiCaprio… he is very clearly an exception as a famous and wealthy actor.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 01:52 PM
1

Actually as income increases, so does happiness. Of course you worry about other issues and you focus on other goals when you make more money, but really, money correlates strongly with happiness which is no surprise. https://grow.acorns.com/wharton-researcher-money-can-buy-happiness/ Although I reckon it’s probably true that happiness doesn’t continue to increase at the same rate as income. At some point you’re becoming marginally happier with each raise. (That’s just my personal speculation th…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 04:36 PM
1

The evidence to the contrary is that it simply isn’t a representative sample LOL. College women literally do not make up the entire population of women. Not really that difficult to understand, the study provided is extremely limited and only provides insight into a small population. It doesn’t surprise me that college students would have back up dates given the nature of their environment, their age, and the lack of seriousness of their commitments. It just can’t be extrapolated to the general …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:48 PM
6

I don’t really think college students are* a representative sample of all women... College relationships are less serious and college students are surrounded by other potential partners. *Edit: typed “aren’t” but meant “are”
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 03:22 AM
2

Well considering my husband has cancer, we’ve gone about 6 months, maybe longer, in a row without sex for reasons totally outside of my control. I didn’t feel the need to post about how ‘woe is me! I need sex! here’s the reasons he shouldn’t deprive me! BUT of course I love him, as evident by... nothing I’ve said, I’m just mad I’m not getting laid’ because I LOVE MY HUSBAND and he is going through something I can’t comprehend and I don’t blame him for. Pre-cancer, when I was pregnant and not fee…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 03:31 PM
7

Consider: not using sex as your only form of intimacy? Like no duh, when you use sex as the ONLY way you feel intimate with your partner, your relationship starts to wane when you aren’t having very frequent sex... For those of us who have other forms of intimacy to lean into (especially during something like three pregnancies and two losses in 18 months), the occasional lack of sexual intimacy isn’t as nearly painful.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 02:53 AM
5

I read a book recently that basically said this. Women can do it all now, they don’t actually need a man for work/money or childcare, AND men don’t step up in the home so they’re oftentimes more of a burden than a help, so to want to be with a man, a woman has to see him adding value. The book also suggested OP’s basic premise - that the growing number of aimless men may be the result of women joining the workforce and being displaced - but interestingly the suggestion to combat that was that me…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 07:48 PM
3

Disingenuous. Many women work and thus contribute to those programs; many men benefit from social programs. And the women overly benefitting are single mothers - in those cases, why blame them for relying on the system set up for single parents when the father in the equation jumped ship? Not sure why you’re speaking in such absolutes as if literally no women work and all of them live off social programs funded by men, but that’s simply not reality. “Everything a woman can do, a man can do bette…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 02:51 PM
3

Because you literally won’t die without sex whereas people literally will die without food. There’s no reason for the government to just create these opportunities for paid sex and then give you money for said sex. The gov isn’t there to keep you happy — it’s barely there to keep you alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 01:26 PM
2

In custody cases, courts favor the primary parent. This is way way way more often moms than dads, even in full time dual income homes. That isn’t a bias towards women, it’s a bias towards primary caregivers — as it should be when discussing what will be least disruptive for a child. If you have evidence that the courts still favor the moms in cases where the dad was the primary parent pre-divorce, then that supports what you’re saying. But otherwise you just have a weak understanding of how cust…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 12:30 AM
2

From birth, dads do not step up to be primary parent. By default that falls on moms. Sure, theoretically, mom has to relinquish being the primary parent. But relationships don’t start off divorced. Dads largely do not arrange to be the primary parent — or even EQUAL parents. Even in dual income homes where both parents work equal hours, dads do not step up. Moms do twice as much childcare as dads in full time dual income families. Sooo... somehow that’s mom’s fault? How? Saying that’s unfair to …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 12:20 AM
3

I don’t consider women being the default primary parent pre-divorce to be a court bias, no. If men want to have the edge in court, they need to step up being the primary parent from the get-go. Men do not do this, by & large. And in fact, many men DO NOT want to be the kid’s primary parent and do not even try to ask for more custody. For whatever reason. They don’t want to be primary parent before divorce or afterwards. Again I ask, WHY would courts unfairly favor the moms?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 12:14 AM
2

Courts rule for the kid, so they favor the parent who is already the more involved caregiver, who has a better living/life situation for the children, and who wants custody. Since most childcare arrangements prior to divorce involve mom being the primary parent, it isn’t a female bias at the divorce level. It’s literally that moms are already significantly more likely to be the primary parent pre-divorce. What exactly would the incentive to favor women be, if it wasn’t in the best interest of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 12:06 AM
7

no not necessarily... i have definitely have met my fair share of middle-tier/lower-tier (for lack of a better term?) looking men who had that light, fun, witty personality and sexy jokes that made me wanna sleep with them way more than just seeing them from afar by looks would, esp if they are otherwise well groomed/dressed. (but it would be naive to say being more attractive doesn’t help.) and i’d imagine it is more common for attractive men to have personalities like that. but it’s not like t…
/r/seduction09/08/20 06:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter