TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

splendorsolace Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by splendorsolace on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Um, yeah, no. Most women go nuts if you want to have sex with any other woman but them. Tell the truth. Women treat men like objects too - possessions. Your talking points are always b.s. You think men don't know how they are treated by women? LOL. Save your breath.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 10:44 PM
2

You said you only dated "much younger men", didn't love any of them, and rejected them harshly. So - classic narcissistic abuse pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 04:07 PM
2

You're a narcissist. A type of toxic predator. You even admit preying on "much younger men".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 01:46 AM
2

You're a narcissist. Who are you trying to kid? Few people in society are more toxic than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 01:45 AM
1

The irony being that you are literally a womanchild. i.e. The female narcissist. "I only date much younger men" Coincidence? Narcissist, know thyself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 01:38 AM
1

The explanation's simple. It's narcissism. You're a narc. You love yourself, which is introverted love. That is why your love is homoamorous, even though your sexuality is not. This is also why you are obsessed with "crushing males's egos". Because narcs have crushed egos (ego injury), can't handle criticism or rejection, and are always hurting. Is that about right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 01:29 AM
1

" have been doing the exact same thing: i have casual sex with much younger males but never enter a committed relationship with them. i end the FWB rather harshly. im hetero, too. i only lust after males but never love them." ​ Not only are you being hypocritical here (you only date "much younger men") but ("i only lust after males but never love them") you are the ones (narcissists) we teach young men about so they can avoid you If you "never love them" kind of sounds like you're a narcissist. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 01:17 AM
1

What does one have to do with the other? Freud did not make statistical arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/19 03:14 PM
0

Note most of these studies also point out that Fathers are less likely to get custody, and tend to get it in situations where the mother has serious emotional problems or there's higher inter-parent conflict. You have to read studies critically and with common sense. You can't just hunt specifically for truths-you-want and proclaim "facts and evidence!" as if you just found stone tablets with "eternal truths" on them. Why would single fathers be worse for boys and girls? There's no compelling re…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 09:32 AM
1

"risk of delinquent behavior among daughters" Sounds like a female problem. ​ "risk of marijuana use among Latino students" Wow - that's pretty specific. Are you racist, or what? ​ It kind of sounds like you're just desperately cherry-picking random stats to support a one-sided viewpoint. ​ In fact, your statistical trivia is so pathetic I'd say it pretty much proves the opposite. Single Fathers clearly do just fine. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 04:36 PM
1

Most adult women I know read a lot of teen dystopian fiction. Teen fiction. Then again, adult men read comic books. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 04:33 PM
1

Well, no one murdered you, and you're a total sh-t, provocating misandry everywhere you can. So I'm going to say you're mostly wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 04:06 PM
1

You're really keen on this idea of rejection. That's curious. My guess is this must be the closest thing you girls ever get to a "proposal". Too sad. Reject what you have to reject, I guess. At least I gave you some narcissistic supply. But you know, the other girls have dates and suitors, and stuff. They're rejecting guys that like them. Not guys that don't. Must be lean/hungry times to come to this. ; )
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 12:12 AM
0

Well, when your answer is "women are better at everything", forgive me if you are not taken seriously. "they apparently cannot bare to have the spotlight being taken away from them for even 1 second. Good grief." LOL. You're the one who runs an entire subreddit that can't tolerate a dissenting opinion. I'm sorry. Perhaps you don't understand. You are a Woman-Going-Their-Own-Way-er, chip-on-her-shoulder, she-woman-man-hater. You have no credibility with me. There's a word for you. It's "sexist".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 12:05 AM
1

Men aren't the opposite of women. They are complementary. Ergo, they fulfill complementary functions, not opposite ones. I really can't make this more explicit than I already have. Why don't you re-read what I wrote, with an open-mind, this time. Women, are, in fact, very good at nurturing children. But they also can be infantilizing. Men keep children progressing toward maturity, and away from nursery. And -> heck, my Dad taught me how to write. Not my Mom. So this talking point you're peddling…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:48 PM
1

Rejected? From what? The bitter womenz club? LOL. You're hilarious. You should try comedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:32 PM
1

"I think once a woman stops loving you, something inside of them just change. It's like they don't have respect for you as a human being, they don't simply wish you well and remember the past and all the things you did for her. They're just out for blood." ​ It's called narcissism. "out for blood" = narcissistic rage "they don't remember the past and all the things you did for her" = narcissistic discard ​ The last point is why you can't just (blindly) #believewomen. ​ Narcissists don't acknowle…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:11 PM
1

Yeah, I wasn't bitching and whining about women. You were bitching and whining about men, and I gave mild pushback. Do these posts not ring a bell? "men don't want to be good people, they want to believe they are" "men are pathetic, aren't they" "males are sociopaths". "There are no good men." That's your sub. Who's actually "pathetic"? Me, or you and your sub? Heck - who runs a sub like that, anyway? You should rename it WGTOW, since that's what all the content is, and then visitors will have a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:01 PM
1

LOL. So , conversely: men are better at making short term decisions, more able to see the big picture, able to process logic and action better, more bold in doing things and capable of dealing with more risk, better at fostering independence in children, more independent themselves, more sympathetic, more useful in conflict, and more dissatisfied and with more incentives to improve things? Wow - it's almost like the sexes evolved together as counterparts with complementary abilities, or somethin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 10:20 PM
0

when you’re able to trash someone in an argument within an environment where their opinion is supposed to be more favored and liked. ------------------------------------------------------------- Of course, that assumes free discourse, which only exists on the male side, because men aren't threatened by logic and argument. The female side bans everyone who disagrees, like petulant schoolkids/bullies. Isn't that what you just did to me, rather than argue with me? LOL. Tell the truth. You don't "tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 09:53 PM
1

You're the one who complained about mistresses not getting enough support. LOL. Nice backtrack. As for "sitting around" - that's what most women do. All you're saying is women don't want men like them. Which is also - hilarious. Men generally don't go around murdering sexually active women. I mean, maybe in the Middle East, or Africa. It's a rarity in Western Civilization. You sure seem to love "sweeping generalization" about the other gender. I think that's just called sexism. The truth is - me…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 04:08 PM
1

Same difference. Life is expensive means supporting a woman is expensive. It's a distinction without a difference. Can you financially support 2 men? Oh, and men probably didn't invent "madonna/whore" either. Clearly you didn't see the recent psych study showing that women will incur risk to themselves to punish other sexually active women, but men won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 07:39 PM
1

Wouldn't all men be in jail for attempted murder? You're silly. Stop projecting/trying to gaslight. You're nutty, not me. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 07:36 PM
1

Women are expensive. Not too many men can "provide" for multiple women, especially in the modern, Feminist age when both genders are fully in the labor pool. And - is there some reason you can't get a job and provide for yourself? ​
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 07:33 PM
1

"males kill their SOs in 99% f cases or at least attempt to" ​ LOL. Wouldn't all women be dead, then? Math may not be your strong suit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 07:29 PM
2

So why do you hate men? What happened? A guy didn't honor his "promise" to you and now you are doing a narcissistic discard of all men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 07:24 PM
2

Of course you do. Most of these are (popular) stereotypes about women. Women lie about their age. Women manipulate men to get children. These aren't male stereotypes, they're female stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 07:20 PM
2

Aren't these all things women do, too? It's almost like you have no self-awareness. Your gender does all those things, too, honey.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 06:56 PM
1

The author of "men are pathetic, aren't they" is complaining about hating women? LOL. Pot, meet kettle.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 06:52 PM
8

Does calling people a "nerd" or a "geek" help establish acceptable standards of normal behavior? Or is it just smearing/bullying people that are different?
/r/MensRights04/01/19 01:31 AM
1

It seems like they suppress it. Neither Slate nor Salon, two popular left-wing sites that are usually all over #MeToo stuff, haven't said one word about this one.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/18 10:18 PM
8

I'd be afraid to drop charges against her. It's your only chance to establish her as the aggressor going forward. You have a slight advantage here in that you reported her first, but you drop charges and you won't have that advantage if she pulls anything again. What evidence do you have? You have threats from her, or anything - emails? What's to stop her from doing this stuff again? I don't see how you have any choice but to proceed - to protect yourself from her in the future.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter