TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

squashedbananas Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by squashedbananas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

It's pretty accurate, yeah. For me, anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 10:25 PM
2

Okay, let me amend that. I can't speak for every feminist. Is that better? Because it's starting to seem like you honestly don't want me to be on your side here. Drop the anti-feminist attitude and learn to work with others who want to achieve the same goals as you.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:38 PM
2

Yeah, weirdly enough I can't speak for every feminist ever. I just thought you might find it encouraging to know that we're not on opposite sides here.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:55 PM
1

I really didn't miss anything, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:37 PM
3

More examples here, in video form If you can't or don't want to watch a video right now, here's another example
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:17 PM
1

This happens all the time. You don't have to imagine it. If it helps, reading what the judge said made my blood boil in this case, too.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:21 PM
0

In that case, you don't have able-bodied privilege or class privilege. There are like ten different varieties of privilege and naturally some of them are going to vary depending on things like where you live. For instance, religious privilege in US is like being a Christian, but Afghanistan is going to have a different standard of religious privilege.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:57 PM
1

To signify a question was being asked. Why do you think I responded? My question is actually rhetorical; no response needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 11:55 PM
2

Sure, they can call themselves feminists, and I haven't said that they aren't. I'm serious about the Westboro comparison. The vast majority of Baptists don't align themselves with the insane radicals in that movement, and TERFs are also insane radicals that most feminists would never align themselves with. And even the person on here tagged as TERF said that they are anti-feminist. So. You know. Is it "no true Scotsman" if they're saying it about themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 06:52 PM
2

They're about as feminist as Westboro attendees are Baptist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 06:35 PM
5

Male therapists in general or male sex therapists?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 02:00 PM
-6

Feminist here and this is just a wildly wrong conclusion to draw. Not that me saying so will change your mind. It's always discouraging when I come across posts in this sub that I think are great, only to read the comments and realize this isn't about men's rights; it's about being anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:36 PM
5

That's exactly it. I wouldn't be surprised to learn this particular bathroom was formerly a men's room or is in a male dorm or something.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:36 PM
-3

It's because the "not all men" movement missed the point of "yes all women." The idea was never to say that all men are evil, but to point out that yes, all women have faced some kind of harassment. To then take that and say "Not all men!" was a way for some men to take a women's issue and make it alllll about themselves. :) So...basically because it's a totally different thing, I guess?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:10 PM
-1

I'd like it better if you took the "g" off darling. You know? Darlin'? Just has a nice little twang to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/14 02:58 AM
-2

You sound a little offended (and flustered). Did I offend you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 11:08 PM
-2

Honestly, it kind of seems like you were using a bigger word just as a way to sound smarter. I wasn't saying idiotical was wrong, just that there was another word that would have worked just as well and is used more commonly. (Psst - the reason some people write "honour" is probably because British English spelling differs from American English. Again - not terribly hard to figure out.)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 11:01 PM
4

Yeah...I meant "idiotic." Hence the extra "couple" of letters. I feel like that should not have been hard to figure out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 10:24 PM
4

idiotical Is there any reason why you chose to add an extra couple of letters to a word that would have worked just as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/14 10:14 PM
1

I'm sorry, so you're saying that feminists who say that male objectification is just as bad as female objectification are treating objectification differently and saying it's not a big deal? Did you actually read all of the links that I provided? I'm really hoping you did, because I spent like a good thirty or so minutes researching and reading them and posting them with what I felt were the most relevant summaries, and so far, I'm getting rewarded with downvotes. Downvotes. For researching. For…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:24 AM
1

Well, I think it's a weird strawman fallacy for sure (suddenly I'm not "good?" Why does that matter and where did that come from?) followed by not one, but two gendered slurs. Yeah, it seems like trolling is your primary goal here. Sorry, but that's not bait worth rising to. I came here for discussion, and you're adding nothing to the discussion. So far nobody has taken the time to actually respond to my original post on topic. Nobody has referenced any of the articles I posted. So, maybe you co…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:33 PM
0

Well, now it seems like you want to turn an interesting conversation into a silly attack, and that's not really my style.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:21 PM
-1

Yeah, your attitude here is really inspiring me.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:33 AM
-1

Okay, and to counter that, here's a feminist arguing for equality and against "special treatment," specifically when it comes to the word "rape." This subreddit even gets a special (positive) shout-out for bringing attention to the issue.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:22 AM
0

Evidence of what, exactly?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:28 AM
0

Oh, just saw this; I'm in the USA.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:36 PM
0

No problem, I enjoyed our discussion. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:34 PM
0

No, I would not do that, because I don't donate money to female-only cancers. When I donate money to cancer, I donate it to gender neutral charities, like the American Cancer Society. I believe that ACS is going to do more good overall than Susan G. Komen. That's not to say that I don't donate to female-oriented charities on occasion; I totally do (they tend to be centered in third world countries). But my monthly charity donation goes to the Foundation Beyond Belief, and in turn, that money get…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:29 PM
0

I have never met a man who does not argue for equality I've met a lot, but I spend a lot of time reading/mocking /r/theredpill so that's not really surprising. And once again, I'm going to have to disagree with you deciding what I, as a feminist, wants.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:17 PM
1

I already did, man.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:12 PM
0

You are right that some of them are like that. The thing is, I could easily flip that statement and say "MRAs are obviously not wrong on some things but the problem is that [some of them] refuse to see the argument from the other side." There will always be pigheaded assholes with every group, cause, philosophy, religion, whatever. That doesn't mean you write off the whole movement, unless you truly believe that the majority of feminists don't care. If you do believe that, well, I would disagree…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:11 PM
0

Hilariously, I originally signed up for the course because I wanted to argue with a bunch of feminazis and show them the error of their ways.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:05 PM
0

That is the problem feminists do not want equality they want special treatment. As a feminist, I'm just going to have to disagree with you there. Many men myself included campaign on issues affecting women but you cannot deny that few women campaign on behalf of men. Nope, I can absolutely deny that, because I have known many women (including myself) to campaign on behalf of men.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:04 PM
1

Aside from all those links I posted earlier, you mean.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:03 PM
0

I was wondering when someone was going to bring up that the ads still exist, and I'm really glad you did, because it brings up a couple interesting talking points. For one thing, I will have to disagree with your claim that if the genders were reversed, the ads wouldn't exist. That's obviously true in some cases; OP has already linked to ads showing a double standard in what gets taken down. However, all you have to do is turn on the television and you'll see that there are plenty of ads out the…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:02 PM
4

I see the hypocrisy; I just don't see you providing any actual hard facts showing that feminists as a whole - or even in general - are dismissing this. All you said was that you and "every other man have met many women" who are hypocrites about it. So all you've given me is anecdotal evidence that cannot be substantiated and now you're saying that you feel comfortable speaking on behalf of every man in existence. Yet here I am, as a feminist, telling you that I agree that it's hypocritical, and …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:48 PM
4

That's a commercial from the 80s. I think we're a little late on banning that one, don't you? And I don't believe that it should be removed from the Internet, nor do I think the banned Pam Anderson Coke ad should be removed from the Internet. I think it's important that we keep an archive of these things where the general public can access them, and what better way to do that than the Internet?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:16 PM
1

Sorry, can you link to any resources of feminists dismissing complaints over these adverts? I mean, it's not like there aren't any cases of feminists complaining about the way Diet Coke panders to women, after all. But here, let me help. This blog post by a feminist decries the ad. Here's an old article from 1994 talking about how the Diet Coke Hunk isn't reverse sexism - it's sexism. This article theorizes that the ad isn't making waves because it's a shitty ad, but even then, they still highli…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:43 PM
12

Actually, the exact opposite of "all" would be "none." (just trying to help)
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/13 08:45 PM
2

Um, no problem, but in that case you should probably stop seeking me out on other subreddits and commenting. Also, you need to learn the difference between trolling and humor.
/r/RedPillWomen20/09/13 09:07 PM
1

Well that's good. I'm glad you were able to charge up your battery before the power went off.
/r/RedPillWomen20/09/13 05:56 PM
0

So did you ever get those bills paid, or are you going out to dinner every night now because your power got turned off and you can't cook anything?
/r/RedPillWomen20/09/13 03:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter