TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

srmfep3 Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by srmfep3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Refinement and emotionality (I assume you mean feminine emotionality like being weepy and whatnot, so I'm using that term fully in that sense here) is something elites liked to cultivate among themselves, if you read about farm workers during those periods, their norms were to be absolute beasts hahaha. This stuff is more due to what is required for success in a given milieu and what people have access to. You simply cannot be a successful human being through refinement and emotionality for the …
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:07 PM
1

This could well be part of it, but what I mostly see is envious betas and envious women trying to destroy masculinity because they see it as better than themselves due to various reasons, and they want to make themselves more powerful relative to masculine men by denigrating us. Basically I see it more as women and beta men feeling they have the ability to get their revenge on masculine men for being stronger and more emotionally together, and it's running amok. The thing is, this dynamic has al…
/r/MensRights22/11/19 11:39 AM
6

No one "sexualizes" anyone for the most part, it's just a term to demonize when male sexuality. Humans are sexual creatures, like any animal, and due to how our brain works, things just are sexual automatically regardless of culture. Anyone telling men to not "sexualize" women is just telling men to be inhuman machines incapable of being in touch with their instincts. Sorry you have to go through these things.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 07:47 AM
2

I got phimosis out of nowhere, so it wasn't really a decision but something medically necessary.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 09:49 PM
6

I got circumcised as an adult and I basically can no longer come to orgasm with a condom on because you lose a huge amount of the sensation you'd otherwise get from your foreskin sliding around. Shit sucks, but it was medically necessary unfortunately. Edit: Not sure why you find genital mutilation funny tbh, more popular types of FGM that still exist aren't that different from circumcision, in that they basically just remove some skin around the clitoris and/or labia to make things look a certa…
/r/MensRights21/11/19 09:43 PM
2

When you think of all the sacrifices men make in war and in situations of poverty things like that, I don't think you can make the case that women suffer more. Men do an immense amount of work to decrease women's suffering, and it is one of the main gender roles we have. Men also suffer more because women complain to get us to do things for them, but then of course it's the women's complaint that gets taken for the only suffering. Women's suffering is just much more visible. We do all these thin…
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:56 PM
11

YEP - this is what I think whenever I see that narrative. I used to be more of the open, feelings-oriented type of guy and it was not good for my mental health or relationships. I had to harden up to really become a better version of myself. Now I look at men who try to act super open emotionally and they're often fucking weasely slime balls who throw people under the bus or won't take care of themselves. It's just not a good option for us, and I'm tired of it being used in circles supposedly tr…
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:43 PM
2

I mean, the thing is, some people do hate cats because of misogyny, but it's pretty rare. Most of the people I know who hate cats in that way have been women who were uncomfortable with femininity, which is a kind of misogyny. But a lot of people who hate cats also just had bad experiences with cats or were drawn in by the anti-cat stereotypes of them being anti-social or something. Are humans obsessed with gender? Absolutely, we're sexual creatures who has a natural biological purpose of procre…
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:17 AM
1

He wasn't broke either, from what I remember he actually made 6 figures around the time he claimed to have. It's not clear he lied at all about his service, like I put forth above. The Gulf War was also Iraq, and he couldn't have claimed the more recent war in Iraq because they both don't say he lied about it being 30 years previous. The PhDs thing was scummy but a lot of the stuff people are saying is just incorrect. Also on the car thing, since that's also part of the narrative you're spreadin…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:40 PM
1

Most of it seems like misunderstandings or the former wife stretching the facts and claiming he said things he didn't. The only thing that was a lie imo was the stuff about his education. Is there evidence he's dishonest? Sure, some, but you were wrong about the military service. It sounds like he probably did serve during the gulf war or something like that or she misunderstood him. They both say it's not something he talked about much anyways. The problem is there are a lot of people running w…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:23 PM
3

He actually was in the military though, most of the stuff that people are using to call him a liar are actually bad interpretations of documents surrounding his divorce. It sounded like to me there was a misunderstanding around his military service and she used that to say he was lying after I read through some of it. Basically she was confused about him being in the marines vs army, and was able to make the case he lied about it in court and won, likely because divorce courts aren't good for me…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:11 PM
2

Dude, it's just expressing the same fake feminist assumptions about men and then promoting this ideal of the "strong, sensitive" man as if it's some kind of new thing when it's been around forever. This is very much shaming men for things we've never done and pushing a feminist narrative of men generally being unemotional jerks - that narrative comes from women reacting to men, not men understanding themselves. The video really does, for the most part, promote feminine emotionality while ignorin…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 05:56 PM
3

This is just Gillette-lite - what garbage. It still starts off with the delusional feminist assumptions about masculinity. Men don't tell their fathers we love them? Since when? Why did that guy get weird looks from these, I suppose, toxic men? Who in their right mind would think it's strange or in any way odd for men to express that they love their fathers? There have always been sensitive men around, and the "strong, sensitive" man is everywhere culturally and throughout history, and highly re…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 05:49 PM
6

Yeah I had a significant amount of guilt when I was with a feminist girlfriend, who used feminism to really batter my self-esteem, although she had issues with BPD that you have to take into account. I was also a feminist during that period of my life and it led to a decent amount of self-hatred and essentially brainwashing myself into believing men were all these things they were said to be. A bit in terms of socializing with women. I do have more of an ability to empathize with women after rea…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:37 AM
3

Yeah, figurative mostly - I mean in the psychoanalytic sense, Freud developed the idea and most psychoanalysts who have studied the issue objectively find strong evidence that penis envy tends to be a big driver in female psychodynamics. Basically there is an initial jealousy once a girl learns that boys have something she doesn't on their bodies, and then envy of the penis becomes a thing that drives discomfort with her gender. Like, why do these other people get something she doesn't? Maybe sh…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:57 AM
4

It's just standard penis envy - masculinize the self and destroy it in men to take their penises away. A magazine called "Gentlemen's Quarterly" is out here actively promoting women's penis envy to men, pretty weird timeline we're in.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 01:50 AM
13

I remember reading the accusation a while ago and it seemed not only absurd, but clearly impossible for several reasons. One of the basic premises is that Trump ran into her and was able, between the time he ran into her near the store and they got to the floor of the store where the event happened, to clear out an entire floor of the high-end department store of employees and customers. Mind you, this is before cell phones existed. How, after running into her unintentionally and then being with…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 12:42 AM
2

Yeah, feminists tend to identify with the shadow/bad archetype of women to use a Jungian idea, which a witch represents. They basically make up an entire set of assumptions about witches that are pure projections of this archetype and their own issues that lack any empirical basis. Notice here this is basically feminists implying it's okay and even good to act in these ways, which are irresponsible and bad for society (consider there was no contraception in those times). Sorry, but if you're goi…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 12:11 AM
2

I mentioned transgenerational transmission of trauma - this is when traumas inflicted on one person gets passed down generations because of the effects it has on their personalities. This focus on genetics will lean toward racial explanations because it overlooks entire forms of social functioning, especially cross-generationally. I doubt genetics could be changed quickly enough and in such a specific way, and even if it were there's no reason slave-holders would select for violent characteristi…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 01:38 AM
3

Black people were enslaved, later pushed into crime centers and sometimes deliberately, and even had the FBI and CIA promote black gangs and drug use in major centers like LA (for the CIA, as related to bringing in drugs from places like Colombia and Nicaragua to help fund drug warlords and contras to fight leftist movements in those countries). That was in part because the US government, and this is documented, saw the black community as a potential threat and a group that could be influenced b…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 12:45 AM
2

109 isn't actually that bad of a sample size for that kind of study, although the generalizability is a problem due to location and time. The FBI data is definitely problematic in that its scope is very limited and well defined, so in terms of determining actual false rape accusations you're kind of covering up that it gives a large underrepresentation so that you can appeal to authority. I could maybe see the pragmatic case, but most people aren't going to understand what the data really means …
/r/MensRights24/10/19 11:57 AM
2

I'm speaking about the scam artist accusation reasoning and you act as if it isn't biased to trust the sleuthing of an LGBT activist on the matter. The blog posts are clearly biased, constantly calling the father a "ne'er do well pathological liar" and whatnot. Also, you can't treat divorce proceedings as documented fact, and most the accusations were refuted by the father and denied there but we of course know the biases of these courts. If you read the limited detailing of arguments in the cas…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 10:12 PM
7

I've read this type of reasoning on it before, and I have to say I vehemently disagree. There is stuff presented in and out of court that support the man's position, eg that the mother did something like lock the boy in his room and say "only boys get eaten by monsters." The mother is a pediatrician and so was given double time to speak in court due to expertise. Having read cases from psychoanalysts treating trans people, this seems like a straightforward case of child abuse, whether the mother…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 12:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter