TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

srs328 Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by srs328 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It’s not true that there’s a kangaroo court that favors women. That’s not the case anymore. Of the fathers who decide to bring the case in front of a judge, 70% of them actually win custody. The reason it is mostly women who get custody is because the mother and father make that decision themselves before going in front of a court. You can read more here
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:54 PM
–

That’s true. I’m only railing against claims that women prefer dating men in their 40’s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:41 AM
–

People who interact with the world are more likely to have an accurate model of the world than people who only theorize about the real world on Internet forums. That was my only point with that
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:41 AM
–

To be clear, I don’t deny that it’s common for girls in their 20’s to be dating guys in their 30’s. What I’m saying is untethered from reality is the claim that girls in their 20’s most desire men in their 40’s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:39 AM
1

Consider that you are attracting the subset of women who are okay with dating older men. You can’t make any conclusions about the average woman’s dating preferences based on your own experience in finding dates
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 03:40 PM
–

Anyone still tethered to reality knows this. Normies know this too. The only people who don’t are the ones who’s entire knowledge on gender relations comes from theorizing on Internet forums
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 03:36 PM
8

Dumbass post. You’re really reaching to clutch your pearls by shoehorning the whole “what about the children!” schtick considering the video you linked is age restricted and that you haven’t given any example of a similar video that is specifically targeting children
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:13 AM
1

How you choose to vent is 100% a reflection of how you feel. Would you give that same charitibility to venting you see on r/twoxchromosomes?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:50 AM
0

Lmao so you’ve decided to fully commit to the male stereotype of zero social intuition. Honestly, I commend you for the dedication (or lack thereof into picking apart social dynamics)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 06:30 AM
1

I think this answer approaches the right answer but misses by assuming too much practicality and innocence in the behavior. Why do you think it’s stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 06:28 AM
1

I understand the train of thought OP was going for, my opposition though is to the premise that there is a significant proportion of women not attracted to their partners. If most women are attracted to their partners, then the whole line of argument falls apart
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 04:43 AM
2

You’re making a claim you can’t substantiate. Can you prove that all these relationships involve women not attracted to their partner? You can’t extrapolate 80/20 swiping habits on a cell phone application to general attraction dynamics in real life. Two completely separate things. But ok, let me hear it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:59 PM
9

Substantiate this. You’re all over this thread defending this post, but every single premise is completely hairbrained
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:45 PM
10

There’s nothing to say when everything you said is wrong. Just look at every sentence, and the rebuttal is the opposite of what you said. For example, the idea of women not being attracted to most men because of the “80/20 rule” and men being attracted to most women. It’s not worth the effort to respond
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:43 PM
6

Look at the woman’s account. She’s obviously a right wing grifter. I don’t know what this random Dr Miller’s response has anything to do with the comment you’re replying to. If anything it just exposes this one evolutionary psychologist as a hack.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 06:00 PM
1

You just compiled all your insecurities along with the gamut of reactions women could have to different events (hint women aren’t a monolith, and any two women may have the exact opposite response to something, independent of the man)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:01 PM
1

Fair enough, I would have given a similar estimate
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:59 PM
1

The first guy would be more successful in ONS/ casual relationship situations, I agree. But I also think there would be a non trivial subset of women who would feel greater attraction to Jeremy Allen than the first guy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:50 PM
0

It’s more than simply status. Women don’t fawn over every single new male actor. The response to Jeremy Allen was noteworthy enough to become a meme. If he was some regular guy with a respectable job, I’m not saying he’d turn heads, but he would absolutely be quite successful in dating
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:32 PM
1

An objective attractiveness scale that reliably predict someone’s preferences doesn’t really exist. People have all sorts of random and arbitrary preferences. Individual people can probably make up scales for themselves, and there would be a lot of overlap between the low ends of most people’s scales, but there would be a shitton of variation 6-10 levels if you were to compare a bunch of people’s scales. I’m a man attracted to women, but if I were to compare the first guy you linked to this guy,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:13 PM
1

Most people will date marry someone who is at about their same level of attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:08 PM
1

I don’t think you know what “symmetric” means lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 03:00 AM
2

You’re not dealing with men desperate for crumbs. There are hundreds, thousands of women online to choose from if a man is looking for porn or only fans content. A ton of that content is free. A random woman wanting to try making money from Onlyfans is competing with all that
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 03:37 AM
2

Believe it or not, some people are naturally more gifted at being seductive and sexual. It’s not that easy to do at a level that you can get thousands of people wanting to pay money on you. Forget basketball, how about dancing. That’s a lot more analogous. You’re not going to be able to pick just anyone off the street and train then to be able to make money off dancing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 03:33 AM
2

Basket ball doesn’t take much effort. It requires an understanding of common plays. It also requires that you can dribble the ball and can throw it in the hoop Then you can make money off basketball by joining the NBA or some other professional league
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 03:20 AM
7

Your examples were thirst traps, onlyfans, FWB, and a betabuxx who will give them money. The first two are already ruled out for the average woman as I’ve explained. The second two are things that a woman would get from her relationship partner, so I just don’t see your point
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 07:57 PM
9

You’re being incoherent. As I said, the average women does not expose herself on Onlyfans. It’s a small small minority of women who are okay with getting naked on camera. If anything, this whole post just tells me that you don’t actually know women in real life
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 07:51 PM
11

You’re really so clueless. Most women who try onlyfans will not make enough money to support themselves. You picked the top earner on onlyfans and twitch to support you argument, but that would not be the average woman’s experience. Let alone the fact that the average woman does not want to expose herself on only fans
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 07:49 PM
17

No I’ve seen it. It’s probably more common than you’d imagine and you’ve probably met men like this, you just didn’t know what to look for. These men may still have primarily male friend groups but display a lot of machismo. They’ll instinctively distrust other men when it comes to showing any sign of vulnerability. They may have very close relationships with the women in their lives, though, and exhibit some vulnerability in front of them
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:00 PM
6

She was arrested and punished. Her actions were not excused in the name of women’s sexual liberation
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 09:14 PM
48

That basically disproves your entire point
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 04:12 AM
7

That’s partly because getting older means harder to have kids, and partly because dating is harder for everyone as they get older. The idea of a “wall” implies something that’s very unique for women as they get older. That’s a made up concept by the red pill. A lot of men also start looking like shit into their 30’s or 40’s, and the dating landscape is very different for everyone in that age group
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 06:46 AM
–

Bruh you got so assmad at that comment 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 04:42 AM
1

The actions they do are probably more reliable, but at no point did anyone claim that pictures are as good an indicator as meeting someone. And no one thinks that in real life either. With OLD, people use the photos as an initial litmus test, then they meet the people they think are promising. This whole topic is so autistic and I don’t even understand the point that is trying to be made
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 10:58 PM
0

That’s fine because so do the words you speak and the actions you engage in
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 10:50 PM
1

I should have phrased it “they definitely can show personality”. For sure some photos won’t really show much, and for some people photos can be misleading. My point was just that photos can be used as a way for someone to display or imply something about themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 10:46 PM
3

Yeah that’s the point, that it’s subjective. You don’t even have a point here, it’s just cynical autism, because the same way people can sell an illusion through photos, they can do with their words and actions when in person. Also men read into women’s photos just as much as women read into men’s
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 10:06 PM
6

They definitely do show personality. The photos you choose to take say something about your personality and your style. Meeting someone on the first few dates is the time to see if the personality displayed in the photos is genuine or just an illusion
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 09:27 PM
0

You aren’t less of a man if a women outcompetes you in something, but you are less of a man if you get disproportionately upset over a woman outcompeting you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 06:12 PM
2

I’m not making it out to be hard, I’m just over explaining it. But it all can happen pretty naturally, and for me at least I don’t have to think too hard about it. I know how to be a pleasant and likable person (that’s all it really is). I don’t know how else to interpret “I don’t particularly like” other than dislike. Like does it mean you’d avoid such a person, you wouldn’t be kind to them, or just that you wouldn’t get very close to them. I guess it’s not that big a deal depending on what tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:53 PM
4

You’re making it out to be way harder than it is. And tbh I’d consider it a red flag if someone disliked a person based off that one aspect of their life. That type of crude heuristic should be thrown in the trash
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:36 PM
5

You don’t have to romantically like promiscuous women. But it’d be a little weird for you to dislike a woman for being promiscuous. No reasonable women is going to dislike virgins. Perhaps many women would feel reluctant to date a virgin because they wonder what that says about them, but that’s just a crude heuristic. If a women finds out you’re a virgin after you’ve gotten to know each other and she already likes you, that revelation wouldn’t suddenly make her I attracted to you. It isn’t weird…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:22 PM
8

I was not really put off by your preference. The only part that stuck out was “I don’t particularly like promiscuous women,” which stood out as something that could potentially point to other undesirable viewpoints, heuristically. Btw I am a male I seriously don’t think any reasonable woman would mind that you want to be with someone who isn’t into casual sex. That said, it would be off putting to many women to be asked “how many sexual partners have you had.” It would also be off putting if the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 09:57 PM
8

I don’t know that your preference is an obsession. I’m saying that if a woman is put off by the way you describe your preference, it may be that it is coming across as obsessive (e.g. idolizing virginity) or unattractive (e.g. putting promiscuous women down). Most non promiscuous women would have no problem is the preference was simply that you prefer to be with a woman who hasn’t had much or any casual sex. It’s actually fairly uncontroversial for someone to have that type of preference. Likewi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 09:42 PM
15

If you’re scaring a women like that away, you’re probably showing way to much obsession with their virginity or non promiscuity. No woman is going to care that a man prefers to be with a less promiscuous woman unless he derides promiscuous woman or shows some other form of unattractive fixation. Maybe look closer at how you speak about these issues to women
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 09:26 PM
5

How old are you, like 22? It’s pretty sad that alcohol is the only way you know to socialize. Hopefully you’ll grow out of it or find AA. And before you ask, I’m from an urbanized part of New England in the United States
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 10:47 PM
3

My town in Massachusetts is a wealthy suburb and we have a community center. You’re just really close minded stubborn and unpleasant
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 10:44 PM
4

Huge if they are as you describe and make major decisions off it. I don’t really care if it’s something they do for fun or if though
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 06:39 PM
0

Trust me, I personally know how important it still is to Cambodians having worked in Lowell, MA specifically with the refugee population. But it’s not relevant to the average American by any stretch. I’ll be more clear now. If you have to actively look something up, chances are it cannot be generalized to a trend that is relevant to half the damn population
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 05:25 PM
-4

Seriously? The genocide in Cambodia was decades ago. People knew it was happening back then. If you have to go out of your way to find examples of a supposed cultural trend, chances are that it is currently irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 04:50 PM
3

Flawed premise here. Your claim is essentially that men provide more to a marriage if you sum their financial and domestic contributions. The only claim you evidenced here is the one about men more often being the breadwinner. You haven’t substantiated whether men are actually taking on domestic duties to an extent that puts their total contribution above their wive’s. This is more of a feelings over facts type of argument tbh. In reality, the number of dual income marriages is rising due to eco…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 10:18 PM
1

Whenever someone tries to boil human behavior down into simple rules like you do here, a shitton of nuance is stripped away. Rarely anything is universally “only two things”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 10:36 PM
1

I only asked so I could put what you were saying in context. The way you’re talking betrays some level of disdain towards women (“emotional junkies”, implying that they’re dumb and illogical for not being able to leave these relationships), so I wasn’t sure how that would impact your ability or desire to form a genuine, caring relationship with a woman that’s built on respect for her. Also the statement “women date shitty men” is a false premise. It’s not a universal rule. Many women end up dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:52 PM
1

How can I possibly respond to statements like “women are emotional junkies”. That’s what I’m saying, it’s not really possible to refute a lot of what you’re saying. I can respond to one thing though. The emotional and logistical forces that make it difficult to leave toxic relationships are more complex than sunk cost fallacy, and they apply equally to men and women. In the early stages of a relationship, when the partner is putting on their best face, you become attached, develop emotions, hope…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:59 PM
1

I can’t really respond to anything you’ve said because it’s either counter to common sense, or just narratives you’ve made up about the world. For example, you’re completely wrong about it not being hard to leave a toxic relationship, and if you can’t see why, you’re just not emotionally intelligent enough to understand relationship dynamics and normal human emotions, and it’s not something I can refute unless you provide a more substantial counter than “women like drama”. And you probably don’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:34 PM
1

Shitty men don’t always show their true colors until you’re emotionally committed in the relationship, and at that point it’s really hard to leave. And what if the issue is that there are too many shitty male partners in the dating pool, making it statistically likely that so many women either remain single or end up with a bad partner? I’m not saying that is definitely true, but when we’re trying to explain issues like abusive relationships, why is the onus on the women?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:21 PM
1

I think the number of men who would sleep with anyone is lower than you’re making it out to be. It’s really mostly a meme/stereotype. Are you one of those men?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 08:43 PM
3

This is a completely flawed premise. I can say as a guy that I can look at a picture of an attractive woman, acknowledge her beauty, and not get aroused. It depends on my prior mood. And what kind of cavemen are you associating with that all the guys you know can only describe a woman’s beauty based on their dick’s response
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 04:20 PM
2

Whoa, you’re sounding a bit defensive. Someone made a comment about why polygamy wouldn’t work for them as well as monogamy, and you responded with paragraphs to defend your relationship. Your description of you and your girlfriends birthday presents sounds nice and all, but as a reply to that other guy, it comes across like you feel the need to justify your relationship arrangement to yourself, as if there’s something you aren’t secure about. I don’t think you’re missing anything in your relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 07:47 PM
2

I doubt most men have a flurry of pornographic images flood their head when they see an attractive woman. Maybe some teenaged boys, but I’m sure most of them grow out of it after puberty. Hormone replacement therapy for trans people can initiative a sort of second puberty, so this is probably what he’s describing: basically going through a pubescent boy phase as an adult. It usually passes
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 01:58 AM
0

I don’t know, what is the common denominator? You see approximately the same rate of a abuse in gay male relationships as well https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_in_same-sex_relationships#Gay_males_and_lesbians
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 10:07 PM
1

I'm not the one who made that claim, but here are a few sources about actual reasons for divorce that I found from a quick search: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J087v18n01_08 "Women were more likely than men to cite: not feeling loved or appreciated, spouse unable or unwilling to meet major needs, feeling put down or belittled, role conflicts, spouse's unreliability, spouse's extramarital affairs, spouse's alcohol abuse, violence, and spouse's drug abuse as reasons for divorce. On …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 05:16 PM
3

So confident yet so wrong. Care to provide any evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 06:14 AM
1

Sure many of them may be valid, but that’s besides the point. The issue is the way the people in that sub interpret the articles to fit the black pill narrative. The articles there are not sufficient to support the black pill ideology. Which makes sense because the ideology is bunk
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 05:30 AM
1

r/blackpillscience does not support the black pill. It’s just a bunch of Incels who don’t know how to read or interpret a scientific paper twisting correlational studies and surveys to fit their defeatist worldview. It’s really not a place for legitimate scientific discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter