TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sskmpd Archive

View 1 posts and 168 comments by sskmpd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

sskmpd/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:56 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If people get their ideas from only TV I feel bad for them. That is what feminists have been claiming for years, regarding body image disorders in young women.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 04:21 PM
1

Last three hookups I had, I put in 100% of the effort in getting the guy. Should I have gotten 100% of the pleasure? Yes.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 04:20 PM
1

I mean women who actually care. I'd wager those girls are just trying to show bravado, like those guys who claim they only date girls with DDs. In reality most don't care. Where do people get ideas about how sex is supposed to work? That is right, popular culture. I mean, even 2½ men makes allusions to how much better Walden is than Alan because Walden has a big penis.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 01:43 PM
1

Agreed, but it is true that it's much more likely that a man will be satisfied than a woman (orgasm is pretty much guaranteed for men), so why should she put in 99% of the work? (I'm just playing devil's advocate here). The man probably is more likely to be satisfied because he does 99% of the work. Actually no, most women don't obsess over penis size. It's not the size of the waves but the motion of the ocean-that's true in most girls' minds I think (of all the women I know, only one actually c…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 09:02 AM
10

I have some suggestions. 1) When women do 99% of the work in getting the hookup, then women can demand 99% of the pleasure from it. 2) If women stopped obsessing over penis sizes, then maybe men would stop thinking that the penis is the ultimate source of pleasure.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:47 PM
5

So tell me Mr. Kimmel, tell me about Virginia Tech, tell me about 9/11, tell me about the Washtington sniper, tell me about the Madrid train bombings, tell me about the London subway bombings, tell me about Boston Marathon.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 03:10 PM
1

Let me guess, if I started talking about group theory, or geometric algebra, or harmonic analysis Amanda would shut down in about 5 seconds and start screaming about how I only speak the language of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:12 AM
2

And off course we should all live the life style that Amanda Marcotte proscribes. You know what Amanda, I have a job that actually requires intense mental effort 8-10 hours a day. When I come home from that job I like to watch some tv and relax. I don't have a job where the only mental effort required is blogging in a stream-of-consciousness style. I am sorry I don't have all the spare time in the world to live your hipster lifestyle.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 07:42 AM
0

You can't be so ignorant to believe that words don't have power.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:26 PM
0

That is not what Anita did. She claimed it was "male privilige".
/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:18 PM
0

The right to narrate the games I make the way I so please.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:56 PM
0

So in short, you don't defend the right to ownership.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:50 PM
0

Those rights doesn't mean people aren't allowed to criticizes you, you ding-dong. No one is arresting you for saying bigoted shit with your friends, and no one is preventing you from hanging out with them. You can just go to your home, lock the door and do whatever you want (and make all the bigoted games you want). Great, so will you stand up to Anita next time she complains? Will you tell the feminists that they can complain all they like, but that no one is under any obligation whatsoever to …
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:35 PM
1

Freedom of assembly. I get to chose what friend I hang out with, I get to chose what jargon we use, how we spend our time and so on. This is under grave threat from women who start demanding that the jargon change, because they feel unwelcome, that I exclude my friends because a woman feel "the creepy vibe" they start demanding that the way the spare time is used is changed to something she is comfortable with. The right to ownership means you're allowed to own property etc. Yes, and decide how …
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:30 PM
1

So your explanation of what the right to freedom of assembly and the right to own property means is to ask me a question? Do you know yourself?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:18 PM
0

So please explain to me.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:39 PM
1

So, I should go to Spain for dating?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:17 AM
3

The contradiction was that you say that you resent women from isolating you because you liked video games, and now you resent them for embracing that subculure and wanting to participate and feel welcome. Double standard. I resent them for first ignoring and ridiculing, and now 20 years later when it is cool an mainstream, the make inceasant demands that everything change to suit them. What kind of guest goes to a party and ceaselessly complains that the music should change, the food and beverag…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:28 AM
9

So if someone plays sports AND video games now do you give them a hard time? Women weren't the only ones contributing to this so why are they the only ones that get the boot? I am sorry. Can you please show me what movement our male bullies have created, where all they do is talk about how we are obliged to listen to how horrible it was to be a woman during the 80s and 90s, and how incredibly priviliged we were that could shut ourselves in basements everywhere with our computers.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:48 PM
4

You're contradicting yourself. They're trying to not care what society things now, but they had several centuries worth of other gender biases to get so you'll have to forgive them if they're a little behind. How does this fit in with Are the women who did this the same women that want to get into games? Do they have some kind of special power where their opinions are the same as every other woman who exists and ever has existed? I'm not trying to minimize whatever trauma you had from getting pi…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:42 PM
6

This goes against my better judgment, I'm really only on this subreddit because Max Temkin just called it out on it's bullshit in a PAX panel. That being said, what right do men have to claim an entire subculture as "their own space"? That would be the right to freedom of assembly and the right to ownership. PAX, is that the place that was deemed to be full of rapists and child molesters after the dick-wolves joke? Then you should tell those people that sucking up to feminists won't help one bit…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:04 AM
4

Could someone please explain the following two very basic concepts to mr Futrelle? Freedom of assemby, I get to chose what people I spend my spare time with, and we together decide what jargon is acceptable. This is not a right that falls to some outsider. Right of ownership. I decide what people I want to share my property with. I decide how I narrate my video game, my comic book etc.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:04 AM
3

Isn't this the basic premise to every conspiracy theory? It's at the very least a convenient, unfalsifiable way of shutting down conversations with protestations of "PRIVILEGE!" without actually having to qualify anything. Sort of like how the one wielding the privilige is blind to it, but somehow women can judge that there is no female privilige?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:28 AM
0

And as soon as you encounter an o-soto gari, an ogosh or even one of the old kotea gaeshi or deashi harai you can do all the fancy kata you like, you are still going down.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:29 AM
1

Uhm. About the skirts. The ban on shorts was implemented by Arriva, a brittish company.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:35 AM
28

Welcome to feminism, where the feels of white middle class women is the penultimate decider.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:07 PM
1

I really like the points about weight and skin color. Didn't feminists establish that right to preference is an inaliable right that can't be questioned whatsoever?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:29 AM
1

Every time "male power fantasy" is brought up, I like to point to Batman. A man so wrought with trauma and guilt about his parents' death that the only thing he can do is engage in self-harming activity. This is a male power fantasy?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:57 AM
20

Finally things are comming to fruition. I have lost count of the number of times female feminists have told me that it is not their problem that I am not getting laid at all, and that I should accept that reproduction is not a right. Let us return this favour by telling women that it is not our problem if they are not getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 07:45 AM
1

You want to know why young men are using viagra? Because they are told that both their own and the woman's sexual satisfaction is their responsibility. This also ties into the so called pornification of culuture. When women can freely talk about how the penis and the size of the penis is the source of all their satisfaction off course men will take heed. How about starting discussing what women do.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:09 AM
8

And always it is their interpretation that is correct. Sometimes I feel that this geekfeminism movement has been co-opten by megalomaniac asbergians. They demand scripts for every possible social situation, but it is always their script and their interpretation.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 01:07 PM
1

I noticed that Mary Gardinier keeps shouting that she has an honors degree in computer science. Is there any requirement for the courses that one has to take for a Bs.c. in CS in Australia or has she tactically choosen easy courses?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:56 PM
20

What is this Ada Initiative? So far as I have seen it seems to be a hit-and-run racket by women who are convinced that their high iq at 14 should be enough to give them comfy jobs for the rest of their lives, and if they don't get it. It is because they are the victims of discrimination.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:51 AM
1

Has Amande made up her mind yet? If rape and abuse is so horrible, is she going to stop sucking up to Hugo Schwyzer?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:09 PM
10

Anyone other than me baffled that a "tech evangelist" claiming years and years and years of experience is unfamiliar with the term "forking a repo"? Oh and the cat. She made an effort to adopt it away to a loving home. I don't see the harm in that, really and I love cats.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:04 PM
1

Same old, same old. You have to have lived as a woman to understand what it is like to be a woman, but somehow everyone knows what it is like to be a man.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:56 AM
5

Why? I personally am tired of having to feel sympathy with all those poor teen girls who feel they can meassure up to models, but at the same time I am just supposed to shrug it off when I read chronicle after chronicle after chronicle from women who think that they are well within their right to commend and critize penis size.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 12:14 PM
5

So you have never heard of japanese ball-busting fetish videos? You have never heard of the CFNM genre? You have never seen the women getting payed to insult the man?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:57 AM
2

Silent Scope
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:33 PM
7

So what? I have been told time and time and time again that reproduction is not a human right. Why should it be a human right for women to reproduce?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:58 AM
4

Really, she is just projecting her own insecurities. Let her rot.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:00 PM
5

Or the man who actually coined the concept of relativity. Pointcaré.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:52 PM
6

Whoa, whoa, whoa... My gender creates a problem for you, so I'm the one who has >o walk around on eggshells, doing my very best not to somehow tempt you with my >feminine witchery should you happen to accidentally hear my voice over >Teamspeak? My server, my game my rules. You can have all the rules you so desire on your own server.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:28 PM
2

You know what it would be called if men said they were off-put by the large number of women in a field? It would be called pure sexism.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:31 AM
-2

Let me translate that for you. Woman thinks anon loser with his vidya is despicable and only worthy of ridicule. Then woman discovers that anon loser makes a boatload of money and changes the world. Then suddenly woman is the victim of discrimination. At least the male bullies that called me a loser had the decency to understand to stay away and take the punishment when push came to shove and I trashed them.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:08 AM
1

Hugo Schwyzer did the same thing, he still teaches.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:54 AM
5

They are probably doing the women a disservice. I have trained jujutsu, karate, ninjutsu and taekwondo. It takes around 6 months just to learn how to move the feet properly. Teaching knee to the groin and fingers in the eyes are just creating a false sense of security.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:16 AM
2

Let's not forget surrogacy. It's oppressive to women.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:16 AM
6

They were patient, huh? Yeah that sounds like every feminist I ever met >too. Feminists are known for being patient and understanding when >debating with MRAs aren't they? I'm sure everyone here knows just how >plausible that story is. I would like to meet this feminist who spends more time educating than shouting "It is no my job to educate you".
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:30 AM
26

He should have made the best of it and demand an upgraded seat if he was to give up what he had paid for.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 10:35 AM
1

We got shown a 1 hour vid of cartoon-sex with tiny, shrunken people >walking around in the genitals and telling is how everything works. What is that going to matter when women go through life being taught that the penis is the source of their sexual pleasure?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:48 PM
7

PZ lost me some time ago for his shitty sanctimonious dogmatism. PZ is starting to look a lot like Hugo, so I wonder. What kind of crimes are PZ trying to blame on everyone else? Sick shit that if you replaced gender with race, would read like >something from a fuckin' Klan rally. Doesn't even have to replace gender with race. Just reimagine it as you being so afraid of being the victim of a violent crime that you at all times had to carry a fully loaded assault rifle. Well, who but a misogynist…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:01 PM
2

I believe that we're getting close to something like that. You may have >to travel abroad, but who cares?! Great.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:01 PM
10

I won't be paying anything if it's a result of trickery. I won't run either. >I'll render myself completely worthless to her through ceasing to exist. >If all men simply refused like that we'd have alternatives quickly. I think it would be better to invest the time and effort into researching a male anti-contraceptive pill.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:24 AM
5

Until you have fembots kicking down the door for having an "old boys >club" like they do when anything similar is attempted. Which is why you make certain to have an army of lawyers that show them the right to freedom of assembly before setting the guard dogs loose on the invaders.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:45 AM
2

Said before, will say again: if MRAs understood feminism, they'd be a >wing of the feminist movement rather than antagonists to it. And as has been said before. Start showing this modern feminism then. I have been to lots of feminist rallies and meetings observing. And as long as these rallies are more occupied with telling women that it is a right to have both children and a career and that it is socieitie's obligation to satisfy this, all while telling men that neither a career nor reproductio…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:10 AM
2

Hugo has a Ph.d. in medieval history, which makes his statements even more disgusting. My recommendation is that Hugo puts his money where his mouth is and leaves this world before his time.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:09 AM
0

I personally have just learned to deal with an unfair hand while >attempting to change it I don't like having my sexuality questioned just >because I can't turn it on or off like an emotionless sex robot. Where are the accusations of entitlement? Where is the talk about the fragile female ego that can't handle rejection?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 11:15 AM
0

Also the point of men's rights is to move men forward not set women >backwards people don't owe you their bodies autonomy is for everyone >including women who want to sleep with "meatheads". Can I use this the other way around? I am sick and tired of hearing women first saluting their right to preference, then bashing men for not being attracted to them, or saying no to sexual acts that the man is not into.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:41 AM
2

You seem to be asking a lot of questions at the same time. The first one being about tax-financed contraceptives. The answer on that one I guess all comes down to where you draw the line at what should be collectively financed. We all have to pay for things we don't think should be collectively financed. It's part of living in a society with other people. Your second question, why women make the choices they do, it's hard to tell. Better not to speculate on it. Let them play market economy to th…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:09 AM
5

FROM THE ARTICLE: "Laurie: We need some more outspoken male >feminists. Maybe you should be one. I’ll train you ..." Thank you >Mistress Control-Freak Cultural Marxist Authoritarian. Like Kyle Payne and Hugo Schwyzer? Oh, and their beloved Rape Culture. It seems they think that just because they make a word up, then the phenomena referenced by it must exist.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:22 PM
13

Here's an idea for the author. Maybe men are angry because women demand raw unfeathered market economy on the dating scene, and except men to adopt the mantra that if they (men) fail then it is their own fault. But in all other fields female failure is explained as discrimination. It is never the woman's fault.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 07:52 AM
3

What we see here is the Strong Independent Woman (tm). This is the female equivalent of Nice Guy(tm). Notice how she is so obsessed with her degree. Is it just mer or do feminists with useless master's degrees in things like english and women's study hold them up as some kinde of laurel?
/r/MensRights28/07/12 11:01 AM
3

Yes rape is a real problem and should not be handled like a power device that needs to be removed. However, analogously if I as a man claimed I was so afraid of being a victim of violent crimes that I had to carry fully loaded assault rifle wherever I went. I would be labeled as paranoid.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:56 AM
-2

I think you are confusing feminists with SRSers. The sad thing is that I am not. The idea is that you're contributing to society's sexualization of >women by putting more value on a woman's physical features than >her mind. Had I been a woman, it would have been called my right to preference. I have the unalienable right to be attracted to whatever I want. If we are talking about non-sexual context. Do feminists themselves treat everyone equally? I'll look it up. Again, I'm not a feminist, I'm j…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:28 PM
0

Feminists aren't against sexualization. It's fine when it happens to >individuals, but they don't like the fact that our culture sexualizes >women so much more than it sexualizes men. So that is why feminists are enraged and scream about rascism when men talk about not being attracted to women of color? When they call physical attraction objectification? See for example feminist criticism of The Game.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:46 PM
7

did I just read a scathing criticism of female sexuality on jezebel? did hell >really just freeze over? I don't think so. First they defend it by labeling it as a mental disorder. Then the author abuses statistics with the quote Statistics show that male inmates are more likely to gain groupies and >have romantic relationships with pen pals than female prisoners. This >could be because men are 11 times more likely to be incarcerated than >women, ... Ever heard of Bayesian interference Traci? Am …
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:43 PM
0

I fail to see the problem. Women have spoken about right to preference for eternity. Now men are exercising that right as well. If bronze is just as much work and effort as gold why shouldn't I go for gold? Oh and on another note, this is the so cherished market economy that women have wanted out of the meat market for eternity.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:14 AM
1

I think it's because an instinctive thought leads women to believe that a >strong man can protect them, and they are more attracted to the >stronger men. We used to have a joke about this. 15 years in the gym, 15 seconds with a submachine gun. In reality though, it is a sad world we live in if people still feel that they have to rely on brute force to feel safe.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:01 PM
3

I have always wondered about this. Why am I supposed to feel bad for female body disorders, caused by some arbitrary reason. But a woman is allowed to voice any body preference she so desires.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 12:18 PM
-3

Market economy dictates that you get paid what someone deems you are worth. Obviously the national basket association of Australia deems that the male basketball team is worth more than the female. Funny how the women seem to love market economy when they get the benefits but hate it when they don't get it.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:52 PM
5

as together we work to create a world free from sexual violence. You start. Tell the girls from middle school that they should have supported me when I beat the living shit out of the bullies who pantsed me, and drew the shower curtains apart after PE instead of telling me that I was a violent psychopath.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:14 AM
0

Why is this man allowed to speak up on anyone else's behaviour? He if anyone epitomizes the neighbour rapist and the Nice Guy (tm) and the Male Chauvinist. I am so tired of this kind of male feminist getting away with blaming everybody else for the very things he has done himself. Wonder what his religious education tells him about Matthew 7:3.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:04 AM
9

Given that the unabomber had a PH.d in mathematics this statement is true but vacuous.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 10:55 AM
1

TL;DR: don't stop making games for men, start making games for women too. Well then maybe Anita and her ilk should read less Dworkin and Dickinson and more Kernie & Ritchie.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:26 AM
-2

Oh look, another reason not to have sex with teenagers. And another proof of the reason that teenagers are not held to the same mental standards as adults.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:37 PM
2

Oh, and I love the comments. How did these guys dupe women into having babies with them if they >didn't see women as humans before the babies? Very valid point. Didn't the Nice Guy (tm) teach us that women can sense if you are morally deficient and thus avoid sexual contact with you. Look at the rationalizations that follow. It is hysterical.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:33 AM
4

While technology can allow a person to exist in a world where they're >surrounded by people of their choosing and opinions that don't >challenge what they already think, immersion in a world designed >completely around a user's preferences can lead to the sort of >intolerance that makes a guy think it's okay to anonymously attack a >woman who challenges his preferred view of the world; too Great, so when will the author be leaving her echo chamber over at jezebel?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:29 AM
-6

This fascinates me more and more. Why is it that atheists are allowed to be as insulting as they wish towards religious persons, but when someone insults an atheist, then oh no.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:26 PM
-1

It's not so much if it is an advantage as if it is not a significant disadvantage. Look for example at the human eye in contrast with how an octupus eye works. On the other hand, even if circumscision reduced HIV, so what? Would you accept chasity belts if it could be proven to reduce HIV? Would you accept pre-emptive imprisonment of persons deemed at risk to commit crimes, if it was shown that it reduced the risk of crime?
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:46 PM
1

Here you are talking about Sweden, then brought up the lack of sex and >reproduction rights, therefore implying that you meant this about Sweden. Yes, I took Sweden as an example as that was the country that was being discussed. But I ask the same question of the US or the UK. Why is it a right to be at home with the consequences of sex, why do feminists fight harder for this right. When they are at the same time so pre-occupied with telling everyone that sex is not a right and that failure at g…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:34 AM
2

I am a woman, so no I have never been a single man, but I am lucky to be friends >with many. But I also don't read pseudo-feminist crap from Cosmo (and the like) >giving me bullshit dating tips that undermines male intelligence. Neither do I. I can visit any mainstream feminist fora on the internet and read the same ideas. This isn't unique to Sweden at all. Just because this bollocks exists doesn't >mean every woman believes that crap, only teens read those magazines and any >adult woman that d…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:05 PM
1

I don't know how much clearer I can be here. What experiences make you feel >oppressed as a man in Sweden and makes you think that sex and reproduction >is hindered here. That was not what I said. What I said was that the opinion is that it is ruthless competition until the moment of conception, very close to true free capitalism. After the conception it seems that there should not be one shred of free market capitalism. Again, I've never felt this way and my sambo read this and doesn't see what…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:24 PM
1

Ok, så där fick du den idén? Personliga erfarenheter kanske? Personal experiences of what? I have eyes to read with.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:03 PM
1

That's not the way men are treated here at all, have you ever even >been here?? Those sentiments would not be tolerated. I live in Sweden. Have been living here for at least 20 years. Och ja, jag pratar tillräckligt bra svenska för att förstå vad folk på gatan pratar om.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:37 PM
1

I don't understand at all what you mean by sex and reproduction not >being rights, I've never heard >or felt anything along those lines. So you have never been a single male who fails at dating and being told by feminist women that you should understand that your desire for sex and reproduction is just entitlement? Families are number 1 and the people have voted that they agree. It's >not like we're upset about it, >we chose this and it works quite well >actually. As I said earlier. After the mo…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:27 PM
4

A lot of modern nations also need an incentive to get people to have >kids--many European birth rates were plummeting, and it would cause >economic collapse to let that happen. So, it'd pay for itself in that >sense, too, if it encourages people who wouldn't have had children >otherwise to spurt out a couple of future workers. So when will we start seeing the government start helping eligible single men to find suitable partners for recreation?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:04 PM
1

But those taxpayers without children will benefit when they get old, and are being supported by other people's children. It balances out. That amount of tax payer money could be poured into robotics research instead, to develop robot companions.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:02 PM
6

Things like that are easily circumvented. Company moves to low cost country with >more liberal regulations leaving only a sales office behind. Certainly. That was however not the point.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:14 PM
6

It's not even at the level of average.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:52 PM
8

What you forgot to tell was that in Norway there are gender quotas on the board of directors in every company above a certain size, private or otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:51 PM
7

Pure BS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EU_27_Gender_Pay_Gap.001.png
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:48 PM
5

I have actually always wondered about the leave law of Sweden. Why is it that taxpayers are supposed to cover the parents' right to leave for child-rearing, while at the same time being told that sex and reproduction are not rights. It is like someone wants ruthless competition until the time of conception, after that it is supposed to be a five year plan.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:44 PM
1

It's worth a try.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:28 PM
7

Try it. You might get rich in the process. You have my support.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 01:41 PM
3

Didn't BP settle out of court? Might have gone the other way if they settled in court, but if I were BP i too would have more important things to do than court procedings.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 09:27 AM
14

Brilliant Erin, brilliant. Insult the people you want to be hired by. Let us know how that works out for you. Oh, and one more thing. How many male writers does your beloved jezebel have?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 09:17 AM
1

What do you except from one of the last places on the internet to accept Hugo Schwyzer?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:12 AM
2

Too bad I don't care, I guess Yes, certainly. That is why you just spent time having this discussion.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:44 AM
2

Now ain't that some shit that don't stink Too bad it doesn't work that way in practice.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:38 AM
2

Basic. Ass. Film. Theory. Read a mutherfuckin book nigga. Movie's are >not just flat images. Read lots of books. Maybe you should try one as well. How about http://www.amazon.com/Logic-For-Dummies-Mark-Zegarelli/dp/0471799416/ref=pd_sim_b_1
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:28 AM
2

Ha ha ha no this isn't morals or whatever the fuck you're talking about >this is basic-ass film theory. No it is not. It just boils down to Men being objectified = right to preference, not a problem, male power fantasy etc. Female being objectified = bad because opression, patriarchy etc.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:19 AM
8

Enticing Estelle? Alluring Amy?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:12 AM
1

Also there's a serious disconnect from reality when you think guys don't >express an attraction to Jessica Alba or Scarlett Johannsen or whoever >all the damn time and anything negative comes of it. Sorry, don't buy it. Just wittnesed enourmous backlash when men expressed that hairy armpits on women were not sexy. Leading feminist in this backlash earlier wanted sympathy because she was overweight. Her argument? Calling men small dicked.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:11 AM
3

No see this is what happens. People point out how women are >presented >in most major Hollywood pictures and then someone goes >"But so-and->so is shirtless!" as if taking two images and divorcing >them of their >context is in any way good film criticism. This is >foundational shit. >Michael Bay shoots Megan Fox like he shoots a car >(which he then takes >to a logical conclusion by having a female >sexbot). Sorry, this is feminist Red Herring 101. When argument that women are objectified and tha…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:09 AM
2

And how is obeying the rules a girl's style of learning? That goes right >back the other direction of stereotypes, suggesting that boys are too >irresponsible, self-absorbed, or wild to follow directions, or rules. What I assume is ment is to teach children that the teachers' answers are always correct, and that questioning authority is inherintly wrong. This is not a good leason to teach young children. Also teachers hate students that break the mold, i.e. ask questions and do things that are n…
/r/MensRights01/07/12 01:28 PM
5

which is seriously messed up in its own right because it completely >ignores that female gamemakers exist. I think it is just a red herring. When things can't be judged on face value alone, then it has to entail moral justifications to obtain the only acceptable answer, always much worse for women.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:48 PM
6

If they want to get MRA opinions, they would post here. Downvoting >everything you dislike and hijacking a thread into MR-lite without any >invitation is immature and inappropriate. You are actively silencing their >ability to have their own discussions. If they don't want other people's opinions they shouldn't discuss on a public forum. If they want to own the discussion they are free to move to a private forum.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:11 PM
4

on the note of "under attack by feminist groups", i've yet to see a single >one call out the fact that every single guy in a video game is perfectly >built and in shape, despite decrying that women are portrayed in the >exact same light. I have. The answer is usually a combination of males imposing ideals on other men, and that guys in video games is an ideal of action.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:09 PM
4

If Rebecca wants to spend her money putting employing HBTIQ people then let her do so. If she wants to spend her money on only games that include HBTIQ people, then let her do that. What should be kept in focus is the right of ownership. Just as Rebecca is free to exclude anyone she so desires from her property so are the gaming companies, so are we. I would hazard a guess that neither Rebecca nor Anita has written one line of code in their entire lives, yet now everything about how to develop v…
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:07 PM
4

From what I have seen the standard reply is that female bodies correspond to a male version of what a female should look like, and the men also correspond to a male fantasy. Therefore it isn't a problem. My answer is BS on all of it.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:54 PM
3

Odd.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:12 PM
4

0.0.0.0 gawker.com 0.0.0.0 jezebel.com Is beter, gives faster lookups.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:54 PM
8

Men are taught by society that the proper way to woo a woman is to be >as nice to her as possible. It's pretty much how movie romances work; Add to this that feminism teaches men that being outright with sexual desires is harassment, being indirect is stalking.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:13 AM
1

This article makes me sick. Jill is a lawyer and she tries the 'didn't know any better' defense? Sorry, doesn't work. And then continuing to make statements that would require the competence of an MD. But on the other hand, what does one expect from a woman who doesn't respect the male right to say no to sexual intercourse.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:07 AM
1

I wonder if one could compare MGM to some other forced bodily invasion on girls. Let's say my religion requires infant girls' ears to be pierced. Would that be also be acceptable under religious protection? If not, then this feminist stance is pure BS.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:04 AM
-10

Sorry cracked. This is proof that you don't know statistics and that in your world men who have sex with other men don't exist. 1) What is the standard deviation of the stated number of sexual partners for men? 2) How many of the average number of sexual partners were of the same sex?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:21 AM
1

What is she going to do with all that money? Tell her to put it towards video games >with characters that her contributors approve of if she's actually serious about this >stuff. This actually made me laugh. Wonder how they will react the first time they get a segfault from their code. "Sexism, sexism, misgony"?
/r/MensRights18/06/12 11:06 AM
1

I am actually a personal friend of Anita. While I don't agree with everything she has >to say, her messages are intelligent and thought provoking. Nothing at all like this >post. I had the joy of watching her analysis of chrismas songs yesterday. First it is objectifying and degrading to women that Marah Carey sings about her wish for the person she is in love with for chrismas, there is not a single genederd pronoun in the lyrics, yet Anita knows for certain that it is about a man. After that i…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 11:02 AM
-5

Can one spin some racial privilege as well? Him being black, and she being white.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:09 PM
8

... That "they are MEN god dammit, they are supposed to do shit right." Really? I thought that it was that when a man committed suicide it was because he wanted to die, and thus chose a method that would be guaranteed to kill him.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:45 PM
6

This is like your WoW complaint. First, these are private communication >channels, commercial ones at that, and the companies which own them >can create any rules they like. Great, so if the provider of the channel accepts the jargon that is currently in use, does that mean that the women complaining are in the incorrect demanding language policing? In my article I endorse the book Art of Community, which has a whole >section on Codes of Conduct. I support them. So? You claimed that men were fre…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 05:54 AM
-4

'part of a team' is not a job title, but I'm guessing you have a technical >lead, whom you resent. Get over it. They have their position for a >reason and it's because they have more technical knowledge and are >better at communicating it. Since I am the one with the in-depth knowledge of algorithms in our team, I am not in competition with this so called technical lead. Let me guess, if we are to play this projection game. You are very uncertain of your own talents so you hold on to you minuscu…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:34 AM
13

So, your complaint is that you're not allowed to have a sexist, >homophobic group of computerized elves? See, your first reaction is to start criticising it. What happened to my freedom to start any male only group I so desired?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:29 AM
10

What "male spaces" are "people" trying to "tear down"? See article about sexism in video games at this subreddit, where women demand that men police their language to make women more comfortable. By your own admission elsewhere, you're young. Have you ever been >a minority? That is, have you ever lived somewhere you didn't speak >the language, for example? You mean like being the only kid that wasn't white at school? You mean like being relentlessly bullied because of your neurological disorder?…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:27 AM
8

But in the case of a computer group, this isn't an issue, since these >groups are already 90%+ men and in my many years in the Free >Software community, being a man in a computer group isn't a >complaint I've heard. If >that were something that came up, then it >might be worth discussing. It's odd that women find out at this very moment that they have always wanted to sit in a smelly basement together with ForeverAlone Neckbeard and code embededC. That is not the way it sounded in the 90s when c…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:21 AM
-5

No dear, Technical Lead. You know, the people who can code BETTER >than everyone else. And as a contract worker I can be fired at any >time but never am, because I get the job >done. Yeah sure, whatever you need to tell yourself. Sorry, I missed hearing just what exactly your position in IT is? I am part of a team that develop asymmetric cryptographic protocols for a defence contractor.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:13 AM
-4

Project leader? Sorry is usually people who can't code but can't be fired either.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 11:56 PM
5

We had a guy like that in a programming team once. He believed that his role was to sit locked in his room coding for 6 weeks straight and that in the end everyone else should shoehorn the revised and re-revised protocols to fit his code.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 11:19 PM
6

I like this true feminism of yours. It is too bad that so few of the feminists are like this true feminism of yours.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:25 AM
3

So what horrible crimes of his past is this man trying to blame on everyone but himself?
/r/MensRights02/06/12 09:01 AM
12

Guys, almost all feminists are egalitarians. Fuck the minority that isn't, > but every feminist I've met (mostly my friends, relatives and teachers) > are complete egalitarians. Let's not hate on them all. They might truly believe that they are egalitarian, but as long as women judge themselves to be the penultimate judge of what problems men suffer, and how those problems should be solved then no there is so egalitarinism. It is just women telling men what men should feel, what men should do an…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:54 AM
5

Why is that so? Haven't we been told time and time and time again that the money goes to the child, not the adult.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 06:47 PM
4

To be able to fight if they want to. Not fighting for being forced. That is a big difference.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:10 AM
1

Soaps and romantic literature. So where in this are there short ugly men with small dicks?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:40 PM
1

One, the majority of porn is and has been created for and by >heterosexual men. Hence, in the film itself, less of a focus on the man, >more of a focus on women. Straight men want variety, so they get >variety. And yet we were told that if you are overweight or unpretty as a woman you have no chance, but there is field of porn out there showing that this is not the case. Three, I have no idea what your response had to do with the text you >quoted? It has very much to do with the quoted text. Por…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:22 AM
1

Keep in mind that last one on the bottom left though; that's the deal >breaker for skating by as a woman. If you're a overweight or not the >prettiest, you're out of luck. So that is why I can find porn with all kinds of women; young, old, thin, overweight, small boobs, big boobs, big butt, small butt and so on. Where is the same for men?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:01 AM
0

Could we perhaps raise the question over at AskFeminists about this? On a side note. Am I the only one seing that feminists don't seem to make a distinction between the governement not outlawing abortions and forcing doctors to do actuall abortions?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:44 PM
2

I see. I wonder when he will react to the article wherein the jezebel editorship claims that sex is a basic necessity for a woman. http://jezebel.com/5890058/this-is-how-much-it-costs-to-own-a-vagina-an-itemized-list I didn't know that contraceptives was needed for basic functioning.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 10:20 AM
3

Oh the humor. Manboobz regulars accusing others of being haters? Considering the hate that is floating around on the manbobz fora, kettle calling pot black much?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:14 AM
2

Read the article, she's now sterile. They froze the embryos for the explicit purpose of preserving her ability to have children after cancer treatment. No, they didn't. They saved the fertilized eggs to be able to post-pone the decision to have children or not. The man has said no. I wonder how this case would sound if 40 year old male virgin lamented that he would never be able to raise a family. My guess is he would be met with ridicule and told that he is as single as he deserves to be.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:08 PM
0

I read all of it, and still. I don't think it is worth the effort to fight manboobz and jezebel. The time is much better spent fighting people like Jessica Valenti and Amanda Marcotte, people with accutall influence in the real world.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 09:05 AM
-1

How many outside of the very small cottery that Manboobz keep even care what manboobz think? This feels a lot like a twitter storm, it's life and death for all involved, for the 95% of the world that don't use twitter it's a meh, whatever. Jezebel is another question, but I don't know. How big is jezebel outside of it's very little circle of friends?
/r/MensRights10/04/12 07:50 AM
0

*"Cisgender (cis-, "on this side of, not across;" compare cisatlantic, *cisalpine) is a neologism meaning "not transgender," that is, having a *gender identity or performing in a gender role that society considers *appropriate for one's sex. " The mens movement is simply one of *several ways in which men are trying to find workable ways to BE *male, it arises from a DIS satisfaction with society's expectations. You do know that it comes from organic chemistry I hope? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 11:57 AM
0

I trust you are familiar with Brandenburg vs Ohio?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 08:47 AM
5

If you think about men that excel in exact sciences you might name dozens, maybe hundreds, but thinking about women I can only name Augusta Ada King and Marie Skłodowska-Curie. Women however often excel in humanitarian "social" sciences, and I see nothing wrong with that. Its a known fact that girls have better left-brain development, while men have better right-brain development, as such it makes sense that, on average, girls would be worse at coding, and exact sciences in general, trying to bl…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:52 PM
5

Yes because god forbid a woman would like a man for who he is, not for what he knows or what he does. What is it now? Liking women who look good is objectification. Linking men for their educational level is called preference.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 09:18 AM
4

Does her past give her any advantage in this competition? If not, then she should be allowed to compete on equal terms with everyone else.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 10:40 AM
1

I don't get it. Women can't combine children and a career? Wheren't we told that sex isn't a human right? Yet somehow the result of sex is a human right for women?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:06 PM
2

If your arguments are sound you don't need to fall back on using insults. Besides I don't see how insulting her would make her any more willing to acctually listen.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 04:21 PM
2

"Firstly, there are basically an even number of transmen and transwomen, as well as other transgender variants (usually called genderqueer)." It there? All research I have found seems to point that female mind in male body is much more prevailing than male in female body.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:42 PM
9

99% of people don't rob banks either. That doesn't mean I am allowed inside a bank while carrying an assault rifle.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:04 PM
1

Have you actually read any of Dawkins' responses to religious people?
/r/MensRights31/12/11 11:37 AM
3

Have to disagree there. Take a look over at skepchick and look at how ofter finally feminism 101 and shakesville are mentioned as sources with not one single atempt at questioning. At best that community is a group of bullies that complement themselves at being better than everyone else.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 12:17 PM
4

Ok, so something on the internet offends Rebecca Watson. It's not like she and her movement hasn't done their best to offend religious persons everywhere. The only difference being that religious persons don't get to play the feeling offended card. They just have to take it.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:45 PM
4

Then why is he a contributor at Jezebel?
/r/MensRights24/12/11 08:03 AM
-3

If he was defending himself against a bully he should have used an axe-kick to the collarbone instead. Much more devastating and much more demoralizing to the enemy.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 11:04 AM
3

Male privilege Some man somewhere has something that some woman wants, but at present does not have.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 06:31 AM
1

I guess you have all ready seen how Amanda Marcotte responds to facts like how much domestic violence is incited by women? And I think that is the main problem with feminism today. Stop letting sociopaths speak for all.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 06:20 AM
1

Do you have any suggestions as how this could be achieved?
/r/MensRights28/11/11 06:02 AM
1

Go up to them and basically say "No, actually this is what is going on..." Please explain how this would be possible when they hold world views so twisted that they actually believe that the greatest victim when a man sets himself on fire is his former wife.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 10:45 AM
0

I used to think like this as well. It is the crazies that are the loudest, but then came Alyssa Bereznak, where not one single feminist called Alyssa out on being a shallow pig, the only thing feminists wanted to discuss was how Alyssa was catching flack because she dared express preference. I still remember how female feminists so occupied with listening to everyone decieded they knew best what it was like growing up as a nerdy boy, not one single so called moderate feminist called them out on …
/r/MensRights27/11/11 10:41 AM
2

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:4Pk7gfC97DcJ:www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2011/09/02/dealbreakers/+deal+breakers+site:feministe.us&cd=1&hl=sv&ct=clnk&client=safari http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:O4uc7YfwU_AJ:pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/dealbreakers+deal+breakers+site:pandagon.net&cd=1&hl=sv&ct=clnk&client=safari Both these people have finished college long ago, need I say more? You want to play hardball, fine with me but you don't get to brea…
/r/MensRights23/11/11 08:05 AM
2

|Hell, are there even any male sexologists? The head authors of the Kinsey reports were male. However, I would have felt more sorry for poor Naomi had it not been for me just seeing yet another young feminist screaming her head off about how she has the right to demand a 9"+ dick and sixpack abs. Sorry women, you reap what you have sown. You wanted ruthless competition, you get ruthless competition. However you don't get to complain when you are on the loosing team. For all I care she can go ove…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 05:55 AM
16

Could somebody please explain to me why womens' lack of children is somehow men's problem? The way I see it men owe women children just as much as women owe men sex, i.e. 0(zero).
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:11 AM
2

You don't find that statement to be at all irrational? Because it sounds >like it's coming from emotion to me, not >logic. I suspect this is the >case because I've seen it happen to my friends and I've said similar >things myself >when I was hurting or feeling pessimistic. So what is the problem with being a pessimistic? I feel the very same. When I was an ugly broke grad student women wouldn't touch me with a 10 foot pole. Why should they get the privilege of spending time with me now when I am…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:47 AM
4

I am 6"6', most conference tshirts end somewhere in height with my navel.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 08:26 AM
1

What I find most interesting in your post is that nowhere do you >contest that "unsocial male nerd" culture is oppressive towards >women. So what if it is? If women don't like the nerd culture they are free to leave, this is the same attitude that is found on feminist websites and blogs, if men don't like the attitude, they are free to leave. You focus solely on excusing that behavior. You take the >horrors of >being a nerd rejected by girls in high school, the struggles >unsocial >nerd boys fac…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 07:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter