TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ssshreddder0112358 Archive

View 0 posts and 266 comments by ssshreddder0112358 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

this does not read like masculinity. your language is intentionally lacking negativity towards those anti masculine things. even saying that "gender is an interesting concept" is certainly not something someone very masculine would say. it reads like someone who has a weird relationship with gender dynamics and an artificial sympathy towards bis/gays.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:21 PM

no, it means your a soyboy cuck who is probably bisexual or guy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:16 PM
0

mean I guess if you’re just one of those “trad men” then it’s fine, as long as you’re going to fund your wife’s trad lifestyle. Dates, shopping, hair, nails, basically whatever she wants… no lol. she is not supposed to consume and waste money. not her money, not my money. no egocentric consumerism. I want a family, I dont want to be a sugar daddy. she is not supposed to be materialistic and shallow and to not want those things. Not to mention you’d better be nothing short of a perfect gentleman …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:42 PM
1

what’s your take on the consensus in psychology that humans don’t have instincts, they have drives? maybe irrelevant if you essentially meant drives but figured i’d ask I think drive and instinct is synonymous. I dont see any difference. they are innate urges. call it sexual instinct or urge, its the same thing. innate biological motivators. how do you know this is a fact and not personal conjecture? cause I know the urges are universal cause I seem them acted out universally and it predicts out…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:09 PM

this is about a relationship in general, not me personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:31 PM
-1

shaming language
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:30 PM
0

my point went completely over your head. if one person makes significantly more money per hour, your saving time by specializing labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:28 PM

We don’t hate men, we dislike men who think they are smarter because they have a penis. false. you dislike men cause society tell you to. Preferential hiring, regardless if I agree with it or not, exists because people are proven to be negatively biases against minorities. no, it exists because the government wants to purposefully discriminate against certain people and push an ideology, the bias against minorities is an excuse, and even if it existed, would be less unjust than legally discrimin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:26 PM
1

this is just so comical. it just shows how little self reflection you have done about your life and how much you have lived on autopilot. it also shows how easy and convenient your life has been. at no point have you ever asked yourself truly why things are the way they are or what to do with your life, why you want what you want and if it actually makes any sense. you always went for the most convenient option. think about how crazy it is for me to read that someone compares the result of self …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 02:25 PM
1

relationships without children are pointless, and you will get that when it is to late. no community is going to come out of this, and you are going to regret it once you are old. everything you value today will have no meaning or value later on in life, and you will feel like your life was pointless and wasted cause it produced nothing of value you can be proud of when you die. and you will have no way of changing that. particularly when you get old and start to brake down and need to be taken …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 02:00 PM
1

How can you not see that you're completely unwilling to see anything from a different perspective I am unwilling to entertain opinions and perspectives without rational arguments What kind of hybris does one has to have in order to be so sure that one's opinion is the only valid one? I will consider someone elses opinion when its justification is rational and can logically compete with mine in terms of predictive power, and coherence and it has to logically address and counter every one of my po…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:52 PM

Men are the victims of violent crimes committed usually by other men, not women. so what? most victims are men, so they have it worse cause they are more likely to experience it. Unfortunately we are much more vulnerable to sexual violence. also not true if you include prison stats. and men are much more likely to get their lives ruined by false accusations then women are to experience actual sexual violence, which is not only more likely but only much worse than experiencing sexual violence. A …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:30 PM
0

there is a huge problem with what you are saying. the purpose of a relationship is a family unit. thats a completely different calculus because of children having different emotional needs, and in particular young children have a high need for time with their mother. And your situation is very inefficient. if you make more in less time, you are more efficient at making money , and because of that, him doing the chores instead of you is also more efficient. if he worked less and or did all the ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:00 PM
1

okay, then he has to be a cuck or he isnt attracted sexually to you and is staying with you out of convenience. men are territorial. males in nature kill other males for getting to close to females. this is no natural behavior. if he saw any sexual value in you, he would be furious about any other dude getting close to you, if he doesnt, there is something wrong here. there is no possibility of him valuing you anymore sexually. .
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:50 PM
1

Honestly, I don't believe in that stuff nor do I think that actually most men do. its obviously true regardless. and that also hyporitical because it logically follows from evolution, so to be logically consistent, you would have to not believe in evolution, and to make that consistent, you would have to reject all of science, which you dont, cause its all about selective hearing and convenience, not truth. However, even if that was the case, women are simply not interested in men that think lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:26 PM
1

that response is an admission that this is true. you went ad hominem instead of arguing the points. there is nothing more to discuss. and you wonder why men hate women when you are trying to gaslight men into accepting parasitic immoral selfish women who are just the worst kind of people imaginable and out to ruin their lifes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 11:59 AM
1

why is it so hard to understand that it does not work like that both ways for many reasons? its effortless for women to get sex, but very hard for men. because of that, finding someone new is always easier for women than working through a stressful relationships that will demand work and restriction from women, which could be escaped at any time out of convenience cause its easy to find another guy who will at least initially take her. even worse, because initial attraction always fades, it mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 11:39 AM
0

YOU want a woman that you control and dictate what she does. yes, cause look what they do when they have choice. nuking families, killing unborn children, supporting their own population replacement and extinction, supporting totalitarian governments, unhealthy diet, cultural destruction, chopping off genitals of their children, etc. women have no ability to make decision for themselves let alone for others, when they have a life time of being bailed out of consequences and never needing to put …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 09:01 PM
1

Im talking about large majority. you are talking about weird alternative edge cases. what are things only men and only women have to do to necessarily maintain a healthy relationship? display their sexually dimorphic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:57 PM
2

that’s about socialized expectations, as evidenced by the tons of men who don’t adhere to that “primal repulsion no they are just suppressing their instinct out of desperation. and there are even men who feel positively about it and like aggressive women. those men are feminine and have gay and cuck tendencies, so not normal, or lie and pretend to not be put off by it out of desperation. i think you may be projecting your own attitude on that onto the population of men like it’s an absolute biol…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:50 PM
0

no it goes case by case. sometimes emotions need to be suppressed. sometimes they should be acted out. generally, this is gendered behavior though. I dont care how valid the reason is, aggression in women is primally repulsive. men generally respond positively to expressions of weakness, helplessness and emotions associated with that, and no matter what the reason is, those things pull a man emotionally closer, while strengh and aggression push him away. the reverse is true for women. women are …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:14 PM
-4

Otherwise, protection comes from the police force and legal system, who are paid by taxes that men and women both pay. doesnt count because this is just outsourced. its like saying I dont need sex cause I go pay a hooker. Women don’t need your leadership. Women are less likely to get in trouble in school or work, less likely to commit a crime, more likely to get a college education and under 30, women make equal money to men as long as they are not mothers. and also more likely to get into lots …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 07:42 PM
-5

just like protection, leadership and provision
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 07:08 PM
0

a comment that went against the politically pushed ideology got deleted by a platform openly stating that they are censoring according to political ideology, and you still dont get it just because they pervert the language in such a way that you read something else into it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 07:05 PM
1

male specific sexual dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 06:56 PM
0

reddit is controlled by the same people who fund the propaganda you bought into, so its just censorship in order to protect the propaganda narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 06:54 PM
-1

you tell me why someone with a healthy family life is on reddit complaining about gender roles and dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 06:19 PM
2

We get less promotions even if we are skilled or more than our male partners no, thats arrogance and wishful thinking that comes from society lying to you about your abilities and quality of work in order to put you in positions to serve as a political tool. We are often assigned taking notes in meeting even when hold the same positions as our male colleagues because you do not actually have the skills that your males colleagues do, you were just given the position to make it look like women cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 06:17 PM
-1

those emotional arguments do not work on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:27 PM
2

I said any. its been 5+ years since I last watched some movie, but I remember those themes very well from my childhood, not so much the names of those movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:25 PM
-3

no, I completely disagree. what you are suggesting punishes production and rewards laziness. If I make more money and have the same amount of free time as her, me having to do the exact same amount of chores would reward her for doing an easier job that is more inefficient, and it would punish me for earning more and being more efficient, which is the typical communist mindset, to reward the lazy and punish production. labor needs to be distributed to maximize cooperation and collective output. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:23 PM
1

choose any. this is a theme is literally all of them, which is part of why I am so disgusted by movies that I can not bare to watch any of them anymore. its also in every mass produced music. all music targeted towards men is either thug culture or a man simping over a woman. music targeted towards women always features either entitlement, anti male and anti gender role themes or hook ups combined with living in the moment, not accountability etc. its literally just deliberate mind control packa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 04:57 PM
5

its literally as easy and effortless as being a child. women get job positions with no effort for political reasons, they dont have to do anything to find a mate, and no matter how they behave or what they do, they are bailed out of all the consequences until old age. whats hard about being a woman when no or very little effort results in an outcome that men have to do exponentially more to get?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 04:46 PM
-5

a man has to control and suppress his emotions in order to get things done. crying is a sign of defeat. its normal for men to have all kinds of emotions, but in order for a man to be effective and to be relied on, those have to be suppressed. how is a man supposed to get things done if he is immobilized by his own emotions and worries? how is he supposed to do potentially life threatening work and or keep competing with other men if he is phased by his child being sick ? the correct response wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 04:46 PM
-4

things that are natural are good because human nature is balanced around maximum cooperation because of it predicting survival of the group and genes. something being "good" means advancing group cooperation, which is synonymous with collective wellbeing. natural behavior in most cases equals maximized cooperation, and therefore maximized collective wellbeing and advancement, which is also the definition of "good". i has to be that way because of survival being tied to cooperation in groups. ofc…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 04:36 PM
3

Im not making a case for looking like a mess, I just explained why men put less effort into those things then women, and why women dont get why men are the way they are. its insane to me how they have no perception of the effort that men do everyday, probably because they are so selfish that they can not conceive of putting themselves in a mans shoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 04:09 PM
-7

unnatural is defined by nature, not by what someone chose to do. plenty of people choose the wrong thing and suffer because of it, and its often a decision that puts them in very unnatural circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:51 PM
3

no they do not. all of them contain the same few themes that are just deliberate brainwashing, mainly a simpy, weak and submissive protagonist getting a woman or women being shown in masculine positions of power. it was always there, just not as in your face as it is today. you have to go back to a time where women were only shown in helpless support positions, thats when normal masculinity and femininity was shown last on TV.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:35 PM
3

every hollywood movie you watched contained deliberate social engineering that involves a guy outcompeting another one over a woman with simpy, submissive and non masculine, weak behavior and attributes. and likewise, women are often shown in masculine roles and positions to brainwash female viewers into loosing the perception of abnormality around it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:31 PM
2

Nope. These children will probably turn out better than the vast majority. thats not much considering that parents staying together is going to be rare, so most are in such a poor condition that its not hard to beat. The importance you ascribe traditional gender roles with regards to children's well being is ridiculous and not based in any developmental litterature that I've seen. its common sense. living beings are fine tuned for their natural environment. if you remove something natural from t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:23 PM
2

certainly not the TV in the last 20 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:15 PM
1

they are looking to recreate the position of a child, where they could to whatever they wanted, and the father took care of their mess and kissed their ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:14 PM
0

your dishonest. a woman intentionally dating a dentist and deciding to have a family and stay home ticks all the positive boxes of your relationship, but the mother did not have to prostitute herself in order to put a hook up through college after accidentally getting pregnant. that relationship has all the positive attributes of your situation, but none of the negatives, and you are desperately trying to assign negative character attributes to that men in order to demonized normality, so avoid …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:09 PM
0

thats not the topic. my point was that only straight women and gays have a problem with normal gender behavior and particularly masculinity in men. straight men strangely all act according to nature and want feminine women who act and look like women, which proves that women in general act on a propagandistic incentive, not their innate desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 02:37 PM
-4

so? while you and him did the right thing after him getting you pregnant, its still making the best out of a messed up situation. you should have never gotten pregnant or had sex with someone who was not ready to be a father. and your children will have a damaged and messed up model of interacting with the opposite gender, and they did have neither a mother or father role, which is going to distort their gender identity and how they approach their life. you and your husband had to have been away…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 02:32 PM
-14

no you are not, your brain does not properly recognize mates, meaning that your body and brain is not functioning like nature intended it to, which is the definition of disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 02:15 PM
-2

So if she pays 100%, does that mean you’re staying home and doing all the chores, including the “feminine stuff? that would be the right thing to do if I was in such position, but I would never be in such a position because I would not date a woman like that, even if she wanted to and did not mind paying all the bills What even is the feminine stuff? the things women always did, like taking care of children, cooking, cleaning, doing the laundry etc. What are masculine chores fixing stuff You’re …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 02:08 PM
-27

yes there is a problem. while this doesnt read like you are taking advantage of him, this situation is still incredibly depressing and unnatural. I would not ever want to be in the position that your husband / bf is in, and I would not be your child, cause your children will have neither a mother nor a father figure, and will see a feminine weak man and a domineering masculine woman, and unnatural interactions between them. and they are really not going to have parents cause their parents are aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:58 PM
-4

I am not living with someone right now. and if I was, I would be doing chores proportional to how much of the bills I pay and how much responsibility I have, and even then I would be doing the masculine stuff, not the women stuff. if I pay 50%, I can do 50% of the chores. if I do 100%, shes staying home and does all the chores. I n no universe am I allowing her to put in less than Im putting in, and its alway going to be divided according to gender roles. if she doesnt want a fair and gendered d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:49 PM
-6

how much is he earning compared to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:11 PM
-5

yes it is, its not my problem that you buy into the political brainwashing of 2024.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:10 PM
-12

exactly. you have a disorder affecting your sexual behavior, so what you are attracted to does not represent healthy women and doesnt matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:06 PM
0

notice how only women are responding. cause their TV told them to hate masculinity, men and normal gender expression
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:46 PM
-6

bs, its just a excuse cause its convenient for you and you benefit unfairly from such an arrangement. claiming that its a turn off is a common way for women to manipulate men into unfair treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:45 PM

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:43 PM
-6

then you have to do 50/50, and should never date a man who makes more than you, cause then him doing half at home is unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:42 PM
-13

correction, relationships dont work unless you do your gender role. doesnt matter how human you are, biology is biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:41 PM
-8

then you are likely gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:39 PM

you completely misjudge the situation because all you know is what you are used to. money is simply removed from the dating process and there is no expectation at all. sure women still passively command resources in the form of a certain lifestyle, and some "forget" their purse often around guys, but thats it. women earn money now, so them demanding monetary shit is like demanding some stranger to give you money. its completely out of place and dumb, and completely nuts for women to ask for and …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:32 PM
11

its not that they cant, they just have so much burden of performance that spending energy and attention on such insignificant things seems pointless and a waste of energy after spending all day performing. thats also the reason why men are generally more messy than women. its crazy how women dont get how energy intensive being a man is, because their life is cozy and void of pressure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:17 PM
1

self defense is not murder, but both are killing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:00 AM
2

thats nonsense. the fact that men are repulsed by women having sex with other men and women being attracted to men who have sex with other women is undeniable proof for it affecting them differently, cause otherwise it would not have been selected for. like I said, women carrying children and getting pregnant is the reason why women bond over sex and men do not, because women and child depend on the fathers protection and provision to survive, which is why getting attached to the father is the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 09:58 AM
0

Ive told her this many times myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:17 AM
1

women do it because the TV tells them to, is not deeper
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:13 AM
1

women have to be treated as servant cause otherwise they destroy everything they touch .
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:12 AM
-4

we want women who do what we tell them to do. otherwise a relationship is pointless, cause women dont understand nothing and can only hope to do the right thing by following what the man says.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:10 AM
0

shes disgusting and worthless. end of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:05 AM
2

Some promiscuous women leave because they chase emotional highs all of them, because thats why they have their body count She was totally faithful to her husband you do not know that. women lie and pretend. you have on idea what she did or didnt do, just what she said, which is guaranteed to be false. but he cheated multiple times and he was generally checked out of the marriage emotionally, so she left. again, she could have been disrespectful and she could have behaved poorly, which really mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:39 AM
1

Yes, that's part of the reason why it's not okay to use tinder for free food, I guess, if you are going to be the one complaining no, it goes much further. this extends to any money, time and attention spent INSIDE a relationship and dating process that is nor reciprocated. Women don't want the men to who we give participation prizes because they are unable to thrive in the conditions of competition either. This example would only work if women were okay with leaving their jobs having men earn m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:26 AM
0

only if real needs were not actually being met, which is never the case. whenever women complain about men they date, its always: he does x not as good as y. he does xyz not as good as that guy. its never an actual need. while men most often complain about extremely rude, selfish and ungrateful treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:21 AM
3

this is a complete nonsense. they are just immoral and selfish , and chase emotional highs, and make up excuses and create problems to cover their tracks. they leave because they have a bad character and messed up value system. its a flaw on their part, and the promiscuous behavior is the result of their value system and priorities. dont try to put this on the men, she had all the choice, she chose them, so she cant claim that her needs are not met, thats just excuses for using the person and wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:17 AM
0

except that barely any women offers that, while demanding much more in return. And im talking about gender roles. women basically refuse to do their part.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:05 AM
2

no, hypergamy is trading in one for another out of greed. its the trading part that makes it hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:53 PM
5

at least she is extremely likely. after all she left lots of other men because she was either manipulating them, using them opportunistically or chasing short term gratification in them, which all means that because of her value system, all relationships will be temporary because she only entered them to get something temporarily, which is evidenced by the number. when I hear a woman say that relationship is about "love", I know that that woman is going to leave everyone she is ever going to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:32 PM
1

Therefore, you could say that the majority of men and women are hypergamous. no, that depends on why the relationship ended. its only hypergamy when that person was deliberately traded in for someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:58 PM
2

who cares what they say? gender / sex is defined by having a Y chromosome or not. if you have one, your a male. if you claim something else, your mentally ill or a liar, and need to be judges as such. and you are going to the toiled that is defined by your genes. problem solved. there is no confusion. either you have the y chromosome or you dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:57 PM
4

its not about not dating the bare minimum. its about throwing a functioning thing away for the possibility of a better one. anyone who throws a working relationship away is a bad person. if that person was not good enough, you should not have wasted their time. and a functioning family unit is so rare today that anyone would be dumb to through a working relationship away, cause the chances of reproducing that is very low.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:52 PM
1

I know. in fact, most dont even think this far. all they see is fear of judgement and bad feelings, and a collectivist force that is offering them the convenience of being immoral and selfish without direct consequence.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:45 PM
2

diagnosed ? in a society where being brainwashed by the TV and mental illness is the norm? again, feelings exists, but they have no value in itself, they are motivators that are meant to compel you towards something valuable. chasing them leaves you with nothing, its just like a drug, completely pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:42 PM
-1

thats simply lack of self awareness. sexual behavior is transactional in nature, just like all friendships and all social interactions. you simply are not aware enough to realize that your "feelings" are guided by a transactional nature. why are you repulsed by someone taking advantage of you? why do you even have negative feelings about someone not reciprocating anything? its incredibly childish to not get where your feelings come from and why you have them and why they are how they are, and wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:34 PM
2

its just a propagandistic lie. just by simply realizing the distinction between genders and sexes, you can resolve so many issues related to the gender identity politics. gender = sex. that solves all of the issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:31 PM
3

no we are not all hypergamous. hypergamy is just greed coupled with opportunity. to say that we are all hypergamous is to say that everyone is greedy and will act on it when there is opportunity, which is certainly not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:27 PM
6

yes. hypergamy is trading in mates against other in an attempt to get a better deal, without anything being wrong with the previous one. basically trading mates out of greed. if a woman changes mates at all without there being anything wrong, thats hypergamy. and women frequently make up shortcomings or actively mistreat men they are trying to leave in an attempt to create a story to cover their real, greedy and immoral motivation. the difference between hypergamy and non hypergamy is that in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:22 PM
0

false cause different biology. read my comment again where I explained the difference. its not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:10 PM
1

im not confused, you are. those texts are written by paid institutions to brainwash you into believing what you believe, never mind how it makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:03 PM
-1

you have zero self awareness. its not stupid to avoid bad investments that you can tell are going to ruin your life. and women have less emotional control then men and are complete slaves to their emotions, so much so that all modern propaganda targets exclusively women via emotional manipulation, so dont come at me with evolving when women are the driving force and tool of all societal destruction, which is only really counteracted by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 10:01 PM
3

again, there is no difference between gender and sex. they are different words for the exact same biological mechanism. you thinking that gender means gender expression is the language perversion that is the propaganda. gender is just sex, not gender expression. and gender expression is also biological. it having a socialized part has nothing to do with that. and that part is also the social aftermath of biological hard coded difference in body and brain, despite the fact that it can be manipula…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:44 PM
0

its not about them being attractive or unattractive. more important is how stable they were and what lifestyle they led, how their interaction was, how long they were together, where and how they met, and then why the relationship ended. since women have all the choice, there are very few scenarios in which a relationship can end without the woman having a major flaw, mostly a wrong value system or bad behavior, which are not curable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:40 PM
3

its not about being able to afford selection, a promiscuous woman is guaranteed to leave and to not doing her part in a relationship so by excluding them, no opportunity is lost cause every attempt at a relationship with such a woman is destined to fail because shes broken.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:35 PM
2

thats still hypergamy. if she was not hypergamous, she would have stayed with the first guy. if she leaves, she is chasing something that some other guy has more of. doesnt have to be physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:31 PM
2

what do women offer other than vagina? everything men value in women, women actively fight against, destroy and refuse to be and to do. what is left other than sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:30 PM
2

this is all woke propaganda nonsense. sex and gender is a synonym, and claiming that its something other than than is deliberately engineered perversion of language. all sexual behavior is biological or the result of socialization that comes as a consequence of biological difference and role. anything else is woke propagandistic nonsense propagated by institutions that are paid to propagate it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:26 PM
-2

again this is false. women taking advantage of a mans resources actively creates men with less resources. it doesnt have to bankrupt them, if it takes away from them, it actively decreases their wealth. any money, attention and time a woman takes from a man that is not reciprocated means that that man is less wealthy, so she actively creates men with less money. same goes for all women who work , cause they are taking away positions that men could do, so they are lowering mens salaries by loweri…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:12 PM
5

short women reproducing with tall men creates short men. short women still prefer tall men, so their desire actively creates short men. more short women reproduce than short men, so most of the reason why short men exist is because of short women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:07 PM
3

no, a slut is worse than a hypocrite, because of the low reproductive value. promiscuity is judged because of reproductive danger associated with it. morality is a layer that comes on top of biology. a hypocritical woman is not a bad investment if she is bonded and completes her role in a relationship. a promiscuous woman is unable to do that or it is very unlikely, making her a much worse mating choice. and morality around sex is also unequally distributed because women have all the choice. wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 08:37 PM
4

why is evolutionary biology so hard for women to get ? men are repulsed in a primal way by female promiscuity because a woman is evolved to get attached to a man through sex because of the dependence for survival, since sex equals pregnancy in nature and the only way for a pregnant woman to survive is to get attached to the father, cause only the father is going to potentially risk his life to protect that child and the woman with it, who can not survive without the man, and is especially vulner…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 08:27 PM
3

women are never actually single, thats how.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:34 PM
3

why mention his smartness then? you mentioning this detail makes no sense unless you connect it to the behavior in some way. "some smart men" implies a connection, cause why mention his level of intelligence if it wasnt meant to be relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:29 PM
5

you sound gay af.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:25 PM
2

> No, it doesn't. It's not risky if you wre taking precautions. you still dont get it. its not about the infection. its about what the type of person you wanted to have sex with says about your priorities, world view and motivation. the fact that you want to have sex with people you have to take precautions with already proves that you want to have sex with the wrong people for the wrong reasons. if you were not familiar enough with that person to know or ask if that person had STDs or to examin…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:57 PM

its the same thing. the fact that those men dont behave like they are in control and are flexible on spending money shows that they are buying an experience of delusion, which is not really transactional in their mind. transactional means there is a fixed pay with a fixed return, and no emotions or social interaction being performed that imitates the behavior of emotion based relationships. but thats very often the case, meaning that the guy has some kind of feelings for the woman, and that make…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 01:41 PM
2

> Did you even read what I said? STDs can be passed on even with condoms I agreed, but thats beside the point. > even with stable partners. no, cause those people have to have gotten the STD from someone else. nobody is born with an STD, so how can someone get one without having sex with on already infected person and how did that person get infected? If it was a line of stable people, there is no way any one those could ever have sex with an infected person. > It doesn't have to come from casua…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 01:35 PM
2

thats completely besides the point. my point is that only people with certain personalities and social / genetic backgrounds can have STDs because of their origin and way of transmission, so in order to get one, you have to have had sex with some of those people or someone who had sex with one of those people, or one who had sex with one who had sex with one and so on, meaning that the person you had to have sex with was someone with a sketchy personality or social background, cause there is no …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 10:17 PM
2

> No it's not. That's logically and factually just plain wrong. there is a collapse in birth rates. thats population decline. extinction is extended population decline. so when the population is radically declining, that being in the process of extinction. > Also false lol. most people today need braces cause their skull is so deformed that their teeth dont fit properly in their jaw. a huge number of people have diabetes or other chronic illnesses. and the fact that so few people are in healthy …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:21 PM
1

no.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:17 AM
1

depends. if its genuine interest generated by it being my interest, that would be really nice. if its just performative and I can tell she isnt actually enjoying it and its just and act, that would feel cringe, manipulative and fake, and be very off putting.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:13 AM
3

I dont know. I think deep down they must know its not real somewhere in their subconscious. I have never been in that situation though, so Im not sure
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:08 AM
7

people are not thriving, the population is going extinct and is chronically sick, physically deformed, and collectively mentally ill. therapy is post modern bs to hook people on anti depressants and not doing anything about their issues by telling them that the problem is them feeling bad about horrible circumstances instead of them just having a natural reaction to bad circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:03 AM
13

no, they delude themselves and actually believe that its just love, and are blind to being abused because they wanna believe its real.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 11:50 PM
2

because they want to delude themselves into believing that they are loved and appreciated. sex workers make it very clear that its transactional. with gold diggers, there can be a delusion. gold diggers never verbally tell someone they are basically just a sex worker, cause if they did, those men would not fall for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 11:48 PM

> Regarding the question of whether adding a man to your life a woman is supposed to incorporate into a mans life, not the other way around. if a woman talks like that, she is completely unable to have any normal relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 11:44 PM

whatever you are used to is easier to you. if you are used to being alone, its easier than being social, despite it not being healthy. same with social people, they are so sensitive to loneliness that they are more willing to put up with toxic interactions. if you can be both alone and social without any issue, thats great.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 11:42 PM

its more what you were exposed to more during your life. if you spend lots of time alone, you learn to keep yourself engaged with your own ideas and thoughts. if you have had constant company and social stimulation in in your childhood, you are not used to that and dont know what to do with yourself. I dont think you are going to find anyone who is okay with being alone for long periods other than people who are very used to it. there might be genetic components that lock you into a very lonely …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 11:31 PM

not necessarily. everyone needs company. its a psychological need. however, the amount of loneliness you were exposed to as a child determines how sensitive you are to loneliness. if you are often alone, you learn to deal with that and become introspective enough to keep yourself engaged in your own thoughts. People who always have company never learn to be alone, so they are much more sensitive because they have not learned how to be alone. their brain just does not know how to keep itself occu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 11:25 PM
2

you are not self aware enough to realize that this "research" is just baseless ideological claims labeled research. their methodology is laughable. I dont need to examine something that I know is opposite to observable reality and self evident, especially knowing how their methodology is non existent and that there is a huge global propaganda effort to push egalitarian bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 01:56 PM
1

thats completely self evident
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 01:53 PM
2

its also just being quiet. women being expressive is draining cause it commands attention. it costs lots of energy to deal with. All decent women I know are generally quit, particularly around strangers and in public. being expressive if fine around familiar people and when its appropriate. If I am annoyed, tired or stressed, I expect you to respect that and not drain me. being expressive in that moment is rude and selfish. also what you are expressing and where matters alot. men dont complain a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 02:36 AM
0

womens gender role is emotional support. complaining about being the only emotional support is you complaining about your gender role. you are supposed to provide that emotional labor. thats the point of you being more emotionally sensitive. men dont want "emotional support" from other men cause there is no point and men biologically dont interact that way. thats what your body is made to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 02:19 AM
0

it depends on the situation in which someone is quit vs loud. if a woman is loud around familiar people, thats non masculine, but if she is loud around strangers or in public, that is masculine and off putting. if a man is quit in his everyday life, thats not feminine. but if he is quit when he gets threatened, challenged or offended and can not ramp up aggression when its necessary, then thats feminine. and btw, "mystery" is a negative trait in woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 02:15 AM
2

no, women talk alot more. men dont express emotions like women do. women typically use 10 sentences to sort of say what men would say in half a sentence, and for men, most things women talk about are pointless to even talk about. women process information differently than men. the way men process information involves much less talking, and there just is less to express. womens feelings over facts psychology forces them to talk a lot more. sure there are massive difference within the gender, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 02:09 AM
2

women being expressive is just another excuse for them being unhinged, lacking emotional control and accountability for their behavior, and behaving like adults. men are less expressive because men learn to edit themselves to get along with other. men just know there are situations where its not okay to act out on emotions. women are just not held accountable or properly raised these days at all. when a woman is "too expressive", she is either rude or immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 02:01 AM
3

its very simple, most women have more sex with fewer men. the higher the body count of people who have sex with each other, the easier STDs can spread. if everyone has sex with just one person in their life, nobody could have STDs and they would go extinct. the more interconnected the infected people are, the more STDs spread. if the people who have sex have lots of sex with people who also have lots of sex, that is going to lead to a web of interconnection that spreads STDs like a wildfire. any…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 01:52 AM
1

just hold them to the same standard and if they dont comply, you are not loosing out on anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 01:46 AM

stop trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:02 AM

your comment is nonsense. the woman is doing something that makes her repulsive and disgusting for money. doesnt matter who pays for it, only she is responsible for doing it and only she has the consequence. she could have refused the money, and its her responsibility to do so cause she has the consequence and makes the money form it, not the dudes who pay for it or watch it. if you take someones offer and do something degenerate, you are immoral cause you did it by choice. nothing else matters.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:29 PM

> And you act like just because something is available that you have to click on it, pull your dick out, and pop one off to the thing you're here whining about I personally would be in favor of banning porn, so this is a poor argument. I dont have to click on anything, and Im not attached to porn, and I barely use it and would not miss anything if it was gone. > You're not even willing to stop > "I stop watching porn if the woman stops looking at social media" you just lied. this quote starts wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:18 PM

yes, cause only the performer has control over it happening, and only they sell their soul for money and suffer the consequence of doing it. the people paying for it have zero control and zero consequence. and men are not trying to get into relationships with men who are involved in the porn industry, so other men being involved in porn is irrelevant. I blame the only person who has actual control and consequence of the process, the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:49 PM

you act like getting paid justifies selling your soul. only women have 100% control over the existence of porn cause they are the product, so they are 100% responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:29 PM
2

no, women do not mature faster, at least not today where they have less responsibilities at any age than men. and the age gap comes form men being attracted to youth and weakness, and women being attracted to strength and leadership and the associated behaviors and roles, which age gaps naturally provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 09:14 PM
1

no. high standards are caused by abundance of choice, typically because of lots of casual attention combined with a short term gratification mindset. its the result of choice and value system. the only way to change that would be a change in values, particularly valuing practicality and stability over gratification, but you have the values you have, and they wont change unless you have some dramatic or dangerous experience that forces you to reevaluate your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 09:03 PM
1

you can do whatever you want to, but almost any man watches at least some porn occasionally, there is no way you can enforce this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:58 PM
0

I stop watching porn if the woman stops looking at social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:54 PM
1

remember that is almost purely women who push for normalizing this, and almost all men say they dont want women to do it, despite taking it when its there. Porn would not exist if it wasnt for women wanting to do it. men are not at fault for taking a free product that only exists because women choose to do it. if women did not want to, there would be no porn. the existence of porn is the collective fault of women, cause men have no control over it. It not mens fault if you do immoral actions for…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:52 PM
1

almost every guy watches porn to some degree. no woman actually enforces such a rule because its not possible and women dont really care about a mans porn usage, they just act like they to virtue signal and blame the man for completely unrelated things.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:29 PM
4

this comment is completely out of place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:44 AM
4

no, your brain is just hyper sexualized. I dont care about how "good" sex is as long as its exclusive and there when I need it. I want labor and tangible value first, not gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:25 AM
5

> A woman is either practicing serial monogamy or use having only one hookup a year since 18. That’s not “for the streets” if you ask me yes it is. hook ups are the result of a certain mindset and attitude towards life and sexuality. one hookup means for the streets, because it means the woman does not see her sexuality as something intimate and personal, and instead sees it as a tool to be used for short term gratification, which is exactly what men are trying to avoid > Picking people is diffi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:21 AM
1

> A woman revealing her body count has a cost to her reputation yeah , cause there is something innately wrong with her having that body count. its on the woman if she does something that people dont like to be associated with, not on the people wanting to avoid it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:45 PM
1

> Nope. Men who sleep around a lot tend to come with other risky lifestyle choices like partying, drinking, drugs, etc. yes, which is the life most women are chasing. > that will also put them at odds with sexually conservative women sure, but they wont be innately repulsed by it like men are and overlook it for other attributes cause its a different priority. > The idea of the man who magically puts all of that aside through the power of "luvvv" is ridiculous and peak irrationality yeah, but wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:26 PM
4

> Her personality wasn’t any different before you found out who she had sex with, it won’t be different afterwards no, but it reveals her character that she may have partially hidden. > Lying to get sex is the same as lying to get a relationship no, cause the cost is vastly different. and in order to be logically coherent, you admitting to any cost or negative from a sexual encounter completely undercuts your argument. why would lying to get sex be bad if sex had no negative implication for wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:22 PM
3

because biology of the genders are different, and so is attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:15 PM
5

people who look to build a family unit and dont have sex and gratification as their highest priority in life. I dont care about how good the sex is, as long as there is exclusive intimacy. cooperation and practicality matters more than sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:06 PM
2

> Her having engaged in consensual sex with other people doesn't have any bearing on her value as a person. Just like being fat, fit, tall, short, black/white/brown etc doesn't define someone's worth, but all of them can be used as a metric for qualifying or disqualifying. not true. your value as a human being is defined by your productiveness in regards to the common good. if you are immoral and destructive, to me you have no value as a human being
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:04 PM
3

if its past 3, yes. how are you getting into 3 serious relationships with people who show all the signs of being a good long term mate and leave all of them after a few months? the woman has all the choice, so why is she picking guys she is leaving this early, and multiple times in a row? its highly unlikely that she actually picked based on practical long term worthy attributes and left 3 guys with no red flags in that short of a time period.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:51 PM
2

> It affects them equally in the sense of making them risky partner choices no, the effects are way worse on women cause men look for opposite things than women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:46 PM
4

it doesnt affect men because women are not attracted to what men are attracted to. women dont care about purity and softness, they are looking for hardness. men are the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:36 PM
2

number of sexual partners makes a woman unlovable no matter how she looks. she may look good and be very sexually attractive. but impure and therefore unlovable.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:33 PM
10

> Numbers dont matter, your ethics do no, numbers do matter, and they connect to ethics. there is no way a woman with a n count of 3 had a gangbang and no other sexual partner. women who do gangbangs have had lots of sexual encounters before considering this, and will have lots of sex afterwards. sexual activity is something that builds up. there is no way a woman can get an n count past 2-3 if she tried to date with the right intentions. its just not possible cause she would have dated someone …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:27 PM
5

lying to get sex is not nearly as immoral as tricking someone into a relationship or possibly family, and men have to lie anyway cause women punish anyone whos honest and moral and reward men who are shameless. women like to be lied to anyway. And no matter how much you lie, the behavior and mannerisms around men that are caused by sexual experience can not be erased or hidden anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 10:21 PM

> I don't care if women make more money than me, men are not superior to women, good on them if they make more money your psychological develpment is obviously messed up. if you were healthy, you would be innately repulsed by the thought of a woman making more, cause it robs you of the gendered social expression that is triggered by the perception of the natural production gradient of the genders. you seem to not have those urges, which is a developmental disorder. dont project negative intentio…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:03 PM
0

women making more money than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 12:15 PM

yeah, but thats because women can not bond anymore because of body count and them often getting with men for exploitative and shallow reasons cause of abundance of choice. men who have high body counts move on easily. > seem to fall deeply in love with one women and gets so attached to her, that even after they break up they never seem to move on and not take any women after her seriously because he’s so emotionally attached to that one women despite other women yeah, because of lack of options.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:20 PM
0

yes you do, you argued for something that men by nature dont want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:08 PM
-1

they are just liars. they are attention 304s. if they felt so endangered by men, they would not have their profile on public, distort their images to look as sexual and as possible, make sexually charged poses, be half naked, and be as verbally provocative and offensive towards men as a collective. if you are afraid of something, you dont do everything in your power to attract and provoke it when the click of a button could set it on private and nobody could contact them. women are just immoral …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 06:05 PM
2

because women are not as non selective sexually as men, and dont respond to visuals and pictures the way men do. a man could do that, but it wont help him much.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 04:30 PM
1

those women actively want to be seen. you can not be insulted by random guys unless you allow them to on your profile. its not defensive. those women intentionally want the attention and distort their looks to boost their ego and act all entitled arrogant and cocky and talk down to men as a collective online to trigger them and anger them to get attention, and then they complain about the outcome as if they did not do anything in their power to provoke a reaction. and then their fragile ego is h…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 04:29 PM
1

> Projection much. I'm not shaming you at all if you are feeling shamed it sounds like a "you" problem. Nothing in my response was about you > Well ... I'm not into men who have a fragile sense of masculinity that me earning more money would be a point of contention projection? in the 2nd quote you label "not being attracted to X" as "fragile sense of masculinity. its shaming me for saying "X is unattractive. I said "men are not attracted to X", and you responded to this with "you have Y negativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 02:57 PM
0

because it is subjective and not objectively quantifiable. and its also feelings based, which is a no basis for a functioning LTR. the choice has to be practical. mates are not friends, and a big reason why modern relationships fail is because people think mates are supposed to be like friends. you are supposed to bond over building the family unit, not personal shit. that was never normal in human history. men and women historically never socialized with each other outside of sexuality and the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 12:13 PM
0

why do you hate yourself and argue against your own interests then?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:20 AM
1

I though you argued for individuality, never mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:19 AM
1

cope. its just unattractive and undesirable. your just trying to shame me for being male and normal. you are stuck with effeminate men cause of your earning, cause nobody else would accept something they dont want. the only men who value a womans money are the ones who are not self sufficient and are afraid of the pressure and responsibility that comes with taking care of someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:17 AM
1

> Or...we could encourage men not to be giant man babies who think that their own failures are justification to beat, cheat and wallow in their own filth... sure, but then those men wont settle for high income women anymore either. > trying to minimize the income of the actual achievers... the woman with a high income is a failure, not a success. a woman who is not a successful mother and wife, measured by the amount and success of her children and man, failed at being female. that was the point…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 10:11 PM
0

you cant argue that
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:16 PM
0

there is no "believing that". its self evident, and questioning that is mental illness or cultist brainwashing. imagine being the type of person who would be laughing about flat earthers being so dumb, and then be confused about something as self evident as something can possibly be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:12 PM
-1

because women are not realistic about their chances and play the game until its too late. if women just get with some guy according to their percentile and made it work , there is nothing wrong with them wanting the best they can get if they are realistic and then pick someone and go off the market. the problem is them breaking families and relationships for the possibility of finding someone higher, producing broken single people and mentally disturbed children. hypergamy is okay if the woman s…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:11 PM
-1

thats wrong. you feel the illusion of individuality. the things that differentiate individuals are tiny compared to their shared subconscious. if you zoom in on a single ant in a colony, all of them seem like individuals, but if you zoom out, all of them move in a geometric pattern. its the same with humans too, thats why propaganda and marketing works on a population.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:06 PM
1

the woman failed just as much at being a woman as the man child failed at being a man, so they are a perfect fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:02 PM
1

earning that money makes you undesirable for anything other than man children, cause who else would accept such a repulsive and upside down situation? certainly not a man with any masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 09:01 PM
0

nice cope for ignoring the fact that those women are stuck with those men cause men dont care about a womans money, so those women put themselves in the position they are in. dont complain about the men who are left when you chose to make yourself undesirable for the ones you wanted
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:58 PM
1

high earning women are forced to take those men cause the other men wont take them. maybe if they are hot they might find someone they like, but there still will be a penalty in terms of the personality of that guy. typically those women end up being single, getting passed around by their peers, or they get with betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:55 PM
0

no, women are bad if they dont do the part that was assigned to them by nature. be what you should be, not something else. then all choices become bad, cause you put yourself in an unwinnable position
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:52 PM
1

its not about doing the chores, its about unfair distribution of labor. and unless you earn the same money per hour, him doing any chores is inefficient because if you worked less and did all the chores instead, the collective value per hours of labor would be higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:50 PM
1

simple solution, women should not have a high income, cause if they do, they have to date down and accept an upside down unworkable situation. nature is clearly telling us that it doesnt want women to be able to get resources by themselves and wants them to depend on men, and its self correcting. give women the resources, and they push the men they want away and get outcompeted by women who do not have those resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:47 PM
2

I dont think its a risk, I think its a guarantee. if you dont like someone, you dont like someone, and thats not going to change just because they give you stuff. you still feel the same emotions, you just dont show them cause you basically get paid to not show them. and you can bet those women are thinking about a way to take your stuff and backstab you if possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:20 PM
3

maybe in the beginning of the relationship, and even then I think it only applies to shallow materialistic women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:15 PM
1

providing a is not gold digging. the difference is the amount and what it is being used for. if the goal was a good family unit and life without having to struggle, that would be providing. if she wants it to be spent on materialism and self expression, thats gold digging.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:05 PM
1

its not about the money, its about the status implication. most women would prefer a white collar guy vs a blue collar guy even if they looked the same, behaved the same and earned the same, cause it just sounds nicer and looks more flashy and polished
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:01 PM
1

a wealthy man should just deliberately withhold status symbols and only spend money on practical stuff that can not be taken advantage off or shown off and only show a simple life, and then all the gold diggers will be repelled.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 08:00 PM
2

doesnt work that way. that dynamic typically involves the man catching feelings and deluding himself into believing that she actually likes him for him. its never really a clear practical agreement. rich men also want to be liked, and they typically tend to be desperate for that because they know most people, especially women, just want their money. women can not make such practical decisions and then treat the guy with respect and stick it out. it would basically just be really expensive prosti…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:57 PM
1

the problem is, those women are not going to treat than man with the respect and desire that he would want because if they dont genuinely feel those emotions, they can not just provide them just because they want to exchange them for money. they would always mistreat this guy and cheat. and at that point, its far cheaper to just pay hookers since they are not any less enthusiastic about sex than those women, but more cheaper and less demanding. and at least its not as humiliating and taxing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:50 PM
1

yes or course, just like every social issue. its not new, they did exactly the same shit in russia and china to cause the past communist revolution. basically, remove all pleasure from reproduction and separate genders as much as possible to isolate people and crash birth rates to collapse the economy and communities, then when people are confused, alone and have all kinds of mental issues and are selfish, they are going to sell communism in the form of "wellfare" as a solution to the chaos and …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:43 PM
1

this is as cringe, childish and delusional as the shit women typically use to excuse their entitlement and behavior. relationships that work focus on the outcome, not on who is more valuble in the dating market. this reads like someone whos is childish and self absorbed and insecure who is using the thought of leverage in dating to boost their low self esteem and overcompensate for insecurities that come from past undesirability.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:33 PM

there is no winner in a gender war, everyone looses. women have been privileged over men for a while, and yes men are collectively getting the short end of the stick in the short term, but it doesnt change the fact that those women will end up alone and unhappy, and that the economy will collapse as a result of the low birth rates and men not being motivated to work. and all the women who are benefiting and taking advantage of their privilege right now will also be poor and miserable, because by…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:51 PM
0

I dont approach women in social situations, cause I know Im not missing out on anything. the women who I know are behaviorally desirable for relationship do not socialize with people outside their social circle and are private people. women socializing with lots of different unfamiliar people has red flag written all over. green flag = seeking familiar people, reg flag = seeking unfamiliar people. Those are guaranteed to be 304s and cheaters because they actively seek to be seen by new men. I do…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:25 PM
-2

Do you have any logical argument against it or do you just dont like my opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 05:01 PM
4

Im not saying there should be no sex. I dont know what a healthy expectation would be over decades. Im just saying that sexual frequency that is considered normal is based on opinions of people who have not had a successful life long marriage or a relationship that is 10 years plus. I am quite certain that our grand parents did not have the amounts of sex that we think of as normal today. I also think that if you can not cooperate with someone without regular sex long term, you can not do it wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:20 PM
3

I must have struck a nerve
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 04:01 PM
6

relationships are too sexualized today. maybe the expectation is completely unrealistic long term, and nobody is considering that. and many people are on anti depressants and have low sex hormones because of those medications, modern nutrition, birth control, plant based foods and endocrine disruptors, plastics, lack of nutrients, lack of dietary colestrol, etc. And lack of gender roles, gendered expression are the main stimuli for sexuality and are also missing from modern relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:48 PM
-6

if the woman is not a virgin, its her fault if she can not be content anymore with the man she has because of being spoiled. women get more selective with more sexual partners because of being desensitized, so its the womans fault in that case. if a man is at fault for going limb because he jerks off to porn 10x a day, than being not attracted because of comparison with past partners is on the woman. its also normal to have less sex and loose most of the physical sexual desire over time. the exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:38 PM
1

Im helping women by not rewarding poor behavior in women and calling it out, and shaming men for simping and letting women get away with shit. and by being anti woke. there is nothing more pro human, pro male and pro female than this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:31 PM
2

is there any evidence of these women getting any more attention than other similar looking women? if not, there is nothing to talk about. they are women, they look like women, and thats enough to be attracted enough to overwrite reason for a large percentage of men. its not like women, who are actively attracted to them being violent criminals. convicted criminal men father statistically more children than non criminals. I doubt this is true for women, so this is nothing to talk about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:15 PM
5

most women are insanely volatile and unpredictable in their behavior. there are always multiple completely contradictory incentives competing in a womans head. its common for women to act very interested, only to ghost you right after. most women just fake it to get some validation and then ghost, or they might ditch you for someone else that hit them up right after, or they might have some weird fear or insecurity about some random meaningless shit, or they think you should not text them to muc…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:08 PM
2

women who respond positively to approaching strangers are 304s. unfamiliar people approaching you is weird and openly shallow, even if they are attractive. nobody likes that, unless they have broken that psychological barrier many times
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:59 PM
3

cold approaching isnt normal. women dont react positively to unfamiliar men approaching them in public. cold approach is inherently shallow and looks based and nobody actually feels emotionally connected to people cold approaching them because its shallow, and genuine people dont like shallow interactions. women who actually go on dates with men based off cold approaching are 304s who have had so many hook ups that they can not feel any barrier between unfamiliar people anymore. women might say …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:54 PM

it is dependent on factors that are outside of the individuals control though. any woman could have chosen to be what was listed, including being a virgin and marrying at 18. thats entirely within the individual women's control at some point in her life. a man can not choose to change the entire society, only himself within given parameters. so if you want to define what someone deserves or equates to, it has to be within someones control. sure in an ideal society, no woman works outside the hom…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:32 PM

> Man should be able to support them financially 100% are you aware that its impossible for every man to earn enough to do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 01:57 PM

projection and media fearmongering
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 01:56 PM

no. any woman can be traditional. its theoretically impossible for every man to pay for all his womans bills because pay is relative to other men. a mans income will always be relative to a womans looks, because income is percentile based. a lower class person can not choose to pay all the bills because in order for someone to earn enough to do that, someone else need to not earn enough to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 01:55 PM
0

women are by nature intentionally more child like, because of their biological dependence for survival and inherent non autonomy, because of their emotional volatility and overall vulnerability. female sexual and social behavior includes child like expressions, expressions of weakness and helplessness, and even their eyes are rounder and bigger compared to mens eyes like the eyes of infants to specifically look more child like. there is no denying this. women trying to act self sufficient and in…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 01:36 PM
1

no, most people just dont have the time or energy to think about this deeply enough. I personally think most people subconsciously know if someone is trustworthy or not, but when they are sexually attracted, their judgement becomes clouded.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 09:57 PM
1

why do you get so emotional over me just being descriptive? the post is about recognizing cheaters, I explained in depth how to tell them apart from non cheaters, and then I get aggressive and provocative responses. if anyone needs professional help, its the person who gets snappy over an objective comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 09:43 PM
1

you are just unaccountable for your own contribution to your problems and offended about the possibility that your issues might be self inflicted. your ego cannot accept that and you have to dismiss what Im saying to protect your ego. you sound as unaccountable as women when your emotional.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 08:19 PM
1

sure, but its very obvious. you can not fake emotions. you can always tell how there is a tension and strange, tense undertone to all their expressions. I would say I can spot potential cheaters just by the look and tension of their facial expression mostly. I just know they are editing themselves and have a type of awareness and level of control to their expression that is unnatural and triggers a gut instinct, sort of like when you are approached by a salesman. he might be very welcoming and n…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 08:04 PM
1

> My boyfriend is the leader in my relationship and I have no issue with being submissive to him and let him take control in making the big decisions if you have to "let" him be in control, that means you are in control, not him. what happens when you have a disagreement? if he doesnt have a way to enforce his will against yours, he has no control and therefore is not leading. what happens when he makes a decision that you dont agree with, and no matter what he says, you have an emotional reacti…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 03:39 PM
1

gender nonconformity is the same as being suicidal. the outcome is the same, so its equally pathological. cringe is pathologizing health and normalizing illness, which is what you are doing. there is no way you can objectively define "illness" without it including gender nonconformity. its equivalent to a dog not wanting to eat, or a living being wanting to not live anymore. and you get this with every illness until it becomes political, I wonder why
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 12:18 PM
1

> No, the women were usually very extroverted/high socially functioning types thats the point. that is why they cheated on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 08:27 AM
1

> I think the issue is that you're looking at relationships as a control/power battle rather than a partnership it not about fighting for control, its about order and leadership. the woman is supposed to trust my decisions, not resist them. I f Im supposed to protect someone, I need to be able to decide what is dangerous and prevent it from happening, and that person needs to trust me that my decision is about that. if I think your behavior is dangerous, then I need to have the power to stop you…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 08:22 AM
1

> I disagree, it's the opposite of submissive for a man to pay for the date. It puts him in the masculine provider position. masculine is being in control. if you have no money, then him having the money to pay puts him in a power position. if you have money yourself, you have more power over him because of the inherent difference in sexuality, which doesnt work and is not traditional. paying and providing needs to go along with power and authority. > we like the traditional gender roles bc thos…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 12:04 AM

the media did not want to hold them accountable, and the women did not either. did the media talk negatively about them? did women in womens spaces online talk negatively about them? I dont think so, it was just the men and a few women, certainly not the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:44 PM

your examples were about females being shown in a negative light, not held accountable for it. being accountable would include a punishment or negative consequence. and I was talking about contemporary media. the only women that are antagonized in modern media are women who are pro gender roles and gender expression, those get treated exactly like men cause its against the woke agenda. and yes the bible and cultural references in movies do contain examples of women being held accountable too, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:08 PM
1

only in the US. Im form western europe. I dont know any woman who would dare to say she is entitled to the guy paying, and nobody would think its okay to say this, including women among women. its not socially acceptable to say. it doesnt prevent some men form doing it anyway, or some women from "forgetting" their purses, but its not a societal expectation, and just seen as rude and entitled, not as traditional. there is no explicit expectation of any provision outside of a family unit. All wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:03 PM
0

why would I be a wage cuck when she is going to work at home for me / the family instead of her boss ? she is not going to sit around doing nothing, thats for sure, and thats more valuable than money that I can not control, and even if I could have full control, I wouldnt take it over a woman just being a woman. > The only reason any woman would get with you is because of your $$$ no, I systematically dont allow any way to financially benefit from me so the only women left have to be women who g…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 07:28 PM
1

Im paying for dates if women dont work and dont own property, which is how it used to be, cause thats why it was a social norm in the first place. also I also dont understand were I said anything about women being "inferior".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 07:22 PM
1

> The research contradicts everything you're saying. no it doesnt. cheating nature always has a negative consequence, even if it is worth it given the benefit. and not all aspects of nature affect humans to the same degree. > You can cheat nature, hence why humans live far longer with medical technology thats not cheating nature in the sense of interfering with psychological urges > have electricity, and large cities. yes, and those have plenty of unwanted consequences. particularly living in bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 06:44 PM
1

> So are men willing to accept women who don’t conform to their gender role as attractive? no, but paying for dates was only part of a mans gender role when women owned no property and did work male jobs with male salaries. paying for dates is part of a mans role like it is for women to not own property or not be able to live on their own wage. you can not remove that context, then it becomes onesided. paying for dates while the woman can own money and works like men is inherently submissive and…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 05:38 PM
1

> Are his chances of getting more dates reduced if he doesn't pay? Yes that doesnt mean anything. if paying for them increases the number of dates, then those women agreed for the wrong reasons and had bad intentions. if you are interested in someone, getting to know them would be something that you want to do, not something that the other person has to pay you for, cause that means you fundamentally dont want to get to to know this person cause otherwise there would be no cost to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 05:27 PM
1

> Thinking that there's a dollar amount that you can pay to make a man respect you more than he does other women is indicative of your internalized misogyny. respectful would be to decline anything that is offered that you plan to give nothing in return for, not taking advantage of someone else's offer knowing they do it to get something in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 05:24 PM
1

no of course not. men used to pay for dates cause women could own no property and lived with their parents. if a woman can work and has the right to own property, the whole point of paying for anything goes away. saying that this is "traditional" is manipulation because it ignores the circumstances and context of that rule. its just weaponized traditionalism to exploit men and put all the risk on them. the easiest way to filter out selfish and materialistic women is to propose an activity as a d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 05:18 PM

yes, or better yet no abortion and no denial of child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 05:07 PM

> People who want equality don't want to be worshipped not true, cause "equality" often means "equality when it benefits me, traditionalism when it benefits me".when women say "equality", they really mean selective equality or outcome, which is just privilege and legal superiority called equality. > “society taught men to be simps because they pushed that Women Are Wonderful”. They coincidentally never noticed the Karen meme, the landwhale meme, Onlyfans Whore memes, or when women like Kathleen …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 05:06 PM
-1

most of this sexual assault is women choosing to put themselves in situations that they are not proud of and then claiming assault to escape the judgement of their actions. women weaponize assault claims to label situations assault that they chose to participate in to protect her reputation. its mostly getting drunk, having sex, people talking about it, and the the woman retroactively claims assault to not look slutty. men today are so passive, there is no way to get sexually assaulted unless th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:46 PM
-1

> No you’re delusional for acting like sexual assault this are a tiny minority of cases, and this was specifically excluded in this thread. and you know that, you are just not arguing in good faith. > and women are running around getting themselves pregnant and then aborting for the fun of it thats literally what they are doing. if they have sex with men who were not LTR worthy or not chosen for the long term, than they chose their situation, and chose this experience at the expense of that unbo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:37 PM
0

so Im delusional for being rational and not wanting to gambe my life on someone who has shown to have a horrible character? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:25 PM
1

lets not act like I have to accept or reject someone without investigating those details. I can still individually judge the circumstances of any particular individual. > Why do you assume those women have sex with „no long term material“ guys? They very well might be in long term relationships. because you said they might have psychological issues, or an abusive relationship, or financial issues. all of those reasons imply poor choice in men or not choosing men based on LTR characteristics, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:23 PM
2

Im not tryting to date married women with kids, so those examples are pretty irrelevant to dating. > There are also 101 medical reasons to abort those are the minority of abortions, and I dont have to assume why someone aborted, I can just ask them, but its mostly not needed because I can just tell be the overall attitude. and health issues are not exactly a green flag either, even if completely unrelated to this topic. > There might be financial reasons or those people might just be at the end …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:42 PM
-2

why the hell do you act as if it was a bad thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:19 PM
-3

no, but if that is the case, those women are also immoral and selfish, and have kids and are married for self gratification. married people with kids can used many types of birth control or get themselves sterilized to avoid pregnancy. there is too many options to prevent this, and people should think about this specifically to avoid this scenario. abortion is naturally mutually exclusive with healthy female psychology, so if they dont watch out and prevent this from happening, I conclude they d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:08 PM
-6

> no one really thinks an 8 week old fetus is a living person, please stop it. yeah, and thats the problem. it IS a living person. every living person used to be a fetus. If you dont think that a living human doesnt have intrinsic value, there is something severely wrong with your moral compass, especially when its your own flesh and blood. its insanely unnatural and pathological, particularly for mothers. > unless youre catholic and believe in ensoulment at conception i dont want to hear the BS…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:00 PM
-1

thats why nobody should have sex with anyone they are not going to have a family with. saying "I have to be able to kill my kid in case birth control fails" really means that you value sex and short term sexual gratification more than life, even more than you own flesh and blood, which is about as selfish and immoral and anti humanitarian and anti life as it can get. People should disown and ghost any women who are pro abortion because it reveals this underlying world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:52 PM
-6

> Maybe she was too young to be a mother ie. teenager then she should not have had sex and the guy should not have either, and her doing this shows irresponsible behavior and choice in men. > Maybe she was poor and didn't want her child to grow up in poverty again, then she should not have had sex with anyone. > Maybe she was in an abusive relationship and her spouse forced her to have an abortion again, it shows that she makes poor decisions, has psychological issues, or a f*ed up value system.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:49 PM
-8

thats exactly the point. you are admitting to valuing sexual freedom and impulsive gratification more than the life of your own child and have zero respect for life, so much so that you are willing to kill your own child just to remove the consequences of sex. the ethical thing to do is to not have sex with people you are not going to be serious with. anything else is unethical and a clear case of immorality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:44 PM
1

> That is one strange opinion. Ones own happiness is selfishness because you aren’t no, its selfish because it comes at the expense of the community, childrens well being, long term fulfillment, other family members, and the whole society because of the lacking communities. and then you complain about people being cold and antisocial and a lack of warmth in the word after choosing to not give to satisfy impulsive urges that you were not wise enough to control and limit for long term fulfillment.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:35 PM
1

stop pathologizing mentally healthy gender expression.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:19 PM
0

its not ridiculous. sexual expression is a negative for functioning relationships. Sexuality erodes desirable LTR characteristics in women. the moment women experience how much power female sexuality can have over men, is the moment they stop being decent people because they know they already have the tools to get things without work or cooperating with men, and that is reflected in their behavior and personality. there is a reason why sexual expression used to be completely banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:17 PM
1

what risk does a woman have? marriage is all one sided, all the risk on the man, and the woman is rewarded for staying and breaking. marriage for many women is like retirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:13 PM
1

> They are anything but useless: the economy will collapse without them no, the economy will collapse BECAUSE of them. the economy depends on the nuclear family and the amount of productive contributors that come out of a healthy family unit and the motivation associated with it. because of women working, men earn less because of demand and supply, and the power dynamic is so tilted towards women that, combined with propaganda and pushed social order, there can be no functioning families with wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:08 PM
1

> What are women supposed to do while they are single? Live off mommy and daddy? they are not supposed to be single, thats how it always worked. being single is not how humans are supposed to live. people should get together as early as possible and build a live and family and stay together until they die, not waste their youth for selfish gratification. all that money that was spent on rent, single activities, traveling, friends activities, student loans and costs associated with education, cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:00 PM
1

> The “provider model” has only ever functioned for people with enough disposable income, which means a small segment of people at a certain point in history. thats a lie and ignorant. the provider model is the natural order. it has been in practice for longer than the existence of social mammals. before there was money, women could naturally not have any property cause they could neither produce not keep it. providing also doesnt mean providing everything. its about the order of leadership and …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:56 PM
1

a womans career success is inversely proportional to her ability to be a mother / wife. career success requires masculine characteristics. children and men require a woman being a woman and having female characteristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:47 PM
1

> For me personally, I don't take any women seriously at all for a LTR if they don't have a successful career and aren't independent. for me its the opposite, its a deal breaker. > Unfortunately many guys don't think like this and buy into the traditional BS. why is it unfortunate when its a much healthier, natural and more efficient way of life? independent career women have all the negatives of women and none of the positives > Edit: studies show that women working part time were happier than …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:44 PM

no, the issue is the woman value system. having fwb and casual sex means the woman values those men more because she is willing to give more for less in return. the other guy has to pay a high price for a used item than some other guy got for free. men have a problem with that because its humiliating and ungrateful. why give and risk so much for someone who values some other guy more just for who he was who did none of that? Id rather starve to death alone than deal with that level of implicit d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:08 PM

obviously guy 1, because of how risk and reward are distributed. sex carries a big risk for women biologically, it causes emotional vulnerability and potential pregnancy, which are both deeply ingrained in a womans sexual and social behavior. For men, sex biologically is free, it takes no resources, and doesnt force emotional vulnerability, its just a gain without cost. Now with relationships and commitment, the risk and reward is reversed. its risky for men because men risk the investment of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:01 PM
2

yes. its still a body you cant touch and smell, not just a thought. and it carries a massive positive status implication for men around other men and women. men who are into casual sex are more about the status than the sexuality, even if they are not consciously aware of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:41 PM
2

because of gynocentric propaganda, and men fearing loneliness, cause most women can easily find someone else but the man can not. its simply the consequence of the forced, artificial upside down power dynamic that comes with the modern society removing any power men have and allowing full exploitation of sexual leverage for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:35 PM
2

I think it is a huge red flag for someone to talk about their relationship details to other people in any shape or form, particularly in public. People who are decent dont talk about negative aspects of their SOs because its just not other people's business, and being with someone who is problematic bad makes you look bad too. relationships are supposed to be intimate and personal and people are supposed to open themselves in ways you would only do with family. if someone talks about relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:30 PM
1

I was talking about women. men are different and obviously cheat for different reasons. But I dont believe you when you label yourself a "boring introvert" because if that was an accurate description, you would not have the opportunity to cheat and would struggle to have gfs even if you were decent looking. > ow I have been accused of it by other women when I was NOT cheating on them. I assumed those were classic cases of projection and cut the cord pretty quick on those, even though I never had…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:26 PM
2

> I don’t think being treated as disposable is a sign of strength I didnt say it is, but it is how the female lizard brain perceives it. women might not consciously think about this, but are still attracted to this kind of behavior. women freak out when you call them whores in public but get turned on when you do it behind closed doors, cause they are attracted to the inherent humiliation and value imbalance. > I think men that treat women like that are assholes and should be avoided sure, but y…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 09:49 PM
2

> if you can show me studies for your claims that would be great no I cannot. Idk if those even exist, but to me its very obvious being a man and looking at other men's behavior. > not that i’m doubting your premise but to say no man can be confident in his life without sexual enforcement is a pretty major claim to make. thats not what I claimed. I claimed that a man can not be confident with women without sexual reinforcement in the current society, which should be obvious given how young women…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:25 PM
6

> Again women aren’t actively attracted to cheaters they are attracted to the traits that cheaters might possess yes, but those are traits that are direct consequences of being a cheater, like preselection and being dismissive around women. > Being treated as disposable isn’t one of them yes, it is. women just perceive it as strength. >There are plenty of men that didn’t have a lot of luck with the ladies that still treat women as disposable no they dont. thats wishful thinking. disposable treat…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:10 PM
2

> Are you saying all extroverts are (potential) cheaters? yes in some sense. they are at least much more likely to get approached and approach other people, so they have much more opportunity and access. just being very outwardly expressive in itself is not what I am talking about, its specifically about being drawn and expressive around groups of strangers and crowds of people or in public in general. being very extroverted with people someone is familiar with is fine. but connecting easily wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:50 PM
1

> If that was the case then no one would ever get cheated on I said people get cheated on because they ignore or dont recognize red flags. I have seen this with many friends and people, and I keep seeing it everywhere online. every single story of cheating people always involves signs of disrespect and plenty of signs of problematic values right from the start of the relationship. just because someone did not recognize them as problematic or predictive of bad behavior, doesnt mean they were not …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:28 PM
-1

yes it is. I have never heard of someone doing something that I would have never thought they were capable of. people just dont like to take accountability for overlooking red flags because they chose to ignore them for the possibility of a reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:48 PM
2

yes. correlation is not causation. women are more likely to date average earners and average looking men than millionaires and models, does that mean they are more attracted to average men though? confidence just coincides with being better looking, lots of positive reinforcement, being easy to socialize with and approach, and therefore also more accessible and available. confident women actively approach men or act like they want to be approached and are easy to talk to, while non confident wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:36 PM
4

my comment is based on common sense and reflecting about responses women give when asked what they are looking for. they all list attributes or describe the man in a way that shows they are chasing impulsive short term attraction over the practicality of a family unit. a woman whos looking for a serious LTR would primarily talk about attributes that make men good family leaders, and would keep sexual attractiveness to the minimum level required to function. instead, most women when asked go imme…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:22 PM
-3

no, people are really simple. I know if someone is capable of cheating just by looking at them and how they dress and socialize. people who get cheated on just overlook the red flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:21 PM
1

1) men dont tell other men to be vulnerable because any man actively gets punished from showing vulnerability implicitly by mens competitive life and nature, and men biologically desire the feeling of invincibility and strength. vulnerability is counter to nature and no man wants to feel vulnerable. its intrinsically undesirable to men and feminine and unmasculine. men are hyper-attracted to expression of vulnerability in women though. 2) women tell men to be more vulnerable because the TV acts …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:10 PM
5

yes of course, because the behavior and expression that goes along with it will always be emotionally attractive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:01 PM
0

non monogamy is unethical in any shape or form, because it destabilizes societies. monogamy is the backbone of civilization. without it, a huge number of men wont have families, wont be motivated to work, and then there is no economy to support few men having multiple women any more, and society breaks down. polygamy only ever was practiced by the ruling class, never the majority of the people, and even then those were very unstable, poor and violent times. the only ethical thing to do is to lim…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:00 PM
2

no, the answer is the opposite, those men are very bad LTR choices, but most women look for impulsive short term gratification and feelings, not practicality and long term stability. even if they consciously want an LTR, most of them are still picking on emotions and impulses, and then dont get why it doesnt work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:50 PM
2

the only problem here is that you can not have those characteristics in a virgin or low n count man. no man is naturally confident with with given how modern society gives young women so much more leverage and dating options, unless he had lots of positive reinforcement in, meaning sexual access throughout his life. with women, its the opposite. lack of experience and sexual access preserve the most attractive behavioral state women can have. > ugly, undesirable socially awkward women being soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:47 PM
-2

if its so nasty, then why do women fantasize about it and actively want to emulate it in the bedroom?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:37 PM
2

men are actively repulsed by confident women. its impulsively unattractive, unlovable and unfeminine. men perceive confidence in women like women perceive lack of confidence in men. physically attractive women tend to be confident and those tend to be very social and look approachable or approach themselves, which is why they are much easier to get into contact with and much easier to socialize with, and men just overlook the confidence cause they are attractive enough or the man desperate enoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:34 PM
5

sure, the difference is that men make much more practical dating decisions and have much less choice both to cheat and to date. and women being promiscuous and acting like they are experienced with men is unattractive to men, while men being preselected and experienced with women is actively attractive to women. there is a big difference in those too. men are attracted to attributes that happen to be possessed by promiscuous women and delude themselves into not seeing the signs, while women are …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:19 PM
1

women choose men based on emotion. they might not consciously want a man who cheats, but they are attracted to the behavior, status and looks of the cheating guy, and women are also attracted to preselection. A man who cheats has to have a behavior that is highly impulsively attractive to women to have so many options, and women have no emotional control and dont choose practicality, which is why they end up with cheating men. they actively are attracted to the personality and status that enable…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:13 PM
-1

> Often, people will say that "You should have vetted better." But anyone could be doing anything while you can't see them, and anyone could be lying about anything. They could be really good at hiding what they really are. ​ no, that's not true. cheating is personality based. you can not hide your personality and value system, because it shows up in every aspect of life. cheating is based on valuing feelings and novelty and chasing those in a relationship, not the practicality of a functioning …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:08 PM
1

cheating is a personality trait and depends on someones value system and world view. women cheat not because you do something wrong, its because they enter relationships to opportunistically chase short term feelings and benefits, and dont actually make a practical choice to make a relationship work. they will always cheat no matter what cause you are going to get old. ask a woman what she is looking for in a man / relationship, and if her initial answer is not to have a family and build a life,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 01:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter