TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stappen_in_staphorst Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by stappen_in_staphorst on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

A lot of shy people are also extroverted and can feel very alone due to their shyness and limited social interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 11:57 PM
1

"introverted" in the psychological sense means nothing more than experiencing social interaction as draining mental energy and reflection as increasing it whereas extroverted is the opposite. It has absolutely nothing to do with social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 11:55 PM
1

I don't put "cheating" on the same pedestal most people do; to me it's breaking an agreement like any other and not some kind of special or holy agreement. I put the same weight on it as "promising to come to your play and then not showing up"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:18 PM
1

https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=“mate+value”&btnG= Ehh, which one of these many actually establishes that there is large congruence because the first 5 at least don't. No, independently assessed mate value is quite consistent. Not perfectly consistent but variation is easily low enough for it to be a useful metric commonly used in research. Well, come with something concretely then because you gave me a google search where the first five don't show it. Remember “mate va…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:44 PM
1

It doesn’t mean “Guy this girl is attracted to”. It means “guy that lots of women within this context would be attracted to”. Is there even any research that suggests such a thing exists? Because in all the "20/80"-type of researches the conclusion is that all the females are attracted to a different 20% for the most part. The way I see it no male is going to be attractive to more than 30-40% of females at max really. People on this sub seem to often really want to believe in oversimplification …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:14 PM
1

To be fair though conventionally attractive females, females in general, people that aren't white, people with no technical interests, extroverted people and what-not get this diagnosis a lot less easily even if they do actually have the symptoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:50 AM
30

Youthful isn't the same as pretty you know. I look the same as I did 15 years back when I was 18 and my face is about as ugly as then but yeah people assume me to be a late teenager. Plenty of ugly teenagers and 20 year olds around and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:29 AM
2

I'm female; I don't want to "date" people so yeah I know beforehand; it's simple calculus. Edit: reading the replies "wanting to date" seems to be code for "liking someone" or something? I wouldn't have sex with someone I don't feel I know very well; doesn't mean I have to like them but I need to be comfortable enough around them to be naked obviously or let them touch me and I'm hesitant towards physical contact with strangers; I wouldn't have sex with someone I wouldn't cuddle or at least shar…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 04:22 AM
5

What does "high value" even mean? Is this just a new fancy term for "someone you find attractive" but using "high value" to make it sound more scientific? He's ripped Ah yes, repressed homosexual male who gets a boner over ripped still believing that the average female prefers that. But no I don't dwell much on the past. In fact he lost his virginity to a 4/10 ethnic average girl that no high value man would ever sleep with. Oh no "ethnic"... say it isn't so.. not an ETHNIC girl. That's just the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 02:11 AM
1

Aha, so now your argument has been moved from "If something survives for three generations it is better than the absolute worst thing that could destroy a society". That's not really a high barrier. You know the Romans had democracy in 200 BCE right? They became an absolute monarchy after Caesar staged a coup d'êtat for personal benefits and the Roman civilization declined after that because it got a slew of leaders that were not as capable simply because they were related to the last leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 05:21 PM
1

If a thing lasts more than three generations, odds are it serves a beneficial purpose. lol absolute monarchies lol. You give human beings waaay too much credit. People are incredibly good at just repeating dumb shit because their parents did it which any objective third observer can see is a terrible idea from a practical standpoint. No dude—the most dumb shit has been repeated for millennia which effectively hurt people's material gains simply because it was "tradition". It it lasts ten generat…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:45 PM
0

You didn't wear pink at your wedding? Such rebellion against gender roles, so edgy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 04:27 AM
1

I think people who make twitter posts like this have a tendency to believe there is some coherent universal "male view' on the world; as in basically their own view which they extend to their entire gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 04:24 AM
1

Ahh yes, "traditional" as in 'something that is 80 years old and before that other things were traditional for 100 years andsoforth'.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 04:23 AM
3

I mean some of them are conventional but some of them are also weird like "wear pink"; like seriously who still cares about pink on an adult; it's a baby colour. How many of those famous stars valued for their attractiveness do you ever still seriously see wearing pink? Is the next thing putting a bow in your hair and wearing pigtails?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 04:21 AM
1

The title maybe but you said "for us".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 10:45 PM
6

Specifically, that it's not necessary for us to enjoy sex It is for some; it isn't for others. What I wish r/ppd would finally understand is that human beings are each individual and that this quest for finding all these "gender absolutes" is a lost cause. I've e seen plenty of posts on r/sex that claim that for them orgams are necessary. I wish for nothing of the sort because there is nothing to understand "about women" "by men"; I want that the individuals that I have sex with understand me. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 10:36 PM
1

And with "western" you mean "US" amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 04:40 PM
1

I mean deeply religious Abrahamics still exist and all. Even outside of that apparently in China about 90% of both males and females consider virginty to be "indispensible" for considering a long term relationship with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 04:11 PM
2

If I can live with people without a penis altogether I can live with a micropenis I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 03:50 PM
2

Why though? It seems to me that the internet is a very good tool to meet these 100 individuals to have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 12:39 AM
3

I've not been taught anything of the sort. I've not been taught anything "about boys" and it's not customary in my culture to begin with. Children get some clinical sex ed at school about how sex works which has no social component and is just biological and then they're left to their own devices to figure it out and it worked fine for me and others. I get the feeling that this preparing of children for "relationships" is mostly an American thing with all those talks. I was not prepared in any w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 04:00 PM
2

They just on average want to "pair up" less and are happier and more comfortable single.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:21 AM
1

"affectionate" is a super broad term and I feel for most what particular thing you do therein is more important than just "affectionate". But basically I do not like being given compliments for its own sake and don't give them and don't like being "told and shown" all the time or ever really. I'm completely with hair being stroked or something like that but compliments are the spawn of Satan.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 10:28 PM
2

The idea that most "slut shaming" is male-originated is a spurious one indeed. There was at least a Twitter research on this which had some crude heuristic of what a "slut shaming post" would be and concluded most came from female accounts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 08:46 PM
0

All single men just want to get laid. If they say they don't want to get laid, they're working the "I don't want to get laid so trust me" angle. So this includes people with a morbid phobia of sex after being raped by a catholic priest as a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 08:42 PM
1

In this case Netherlands but really "buying drinks" is mostly a thing of Anglic cultures I feel in particular North America; it was never a thing in most parts of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 05:25 PM
1

Doesn't really happen in my culture. If someone were to buy me a drink I'd be as confused as if a random person on the street would hand me a pack of crackers and say "Here, for you?" I would assume it was some kind of promotional event for a cracker brand.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 02:10 PM
1

Just asking where the line lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 01:09 AM
0

Okay, so what about one of those escorts who are also expected to hold a somewhat civilized conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 01:05 AM
0

Like I said what if the payment was in terms of food and dinner? They say shared-finance relationships where one out-earns the other is essentially a form of prostitution as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 01:00 AM
1

And do you honestly think that human properties follow such a perfect mathematical bell curve and that things like human height, intelligence, life expectancy andsoforth are on a perfect mathematical bell curve or that it's just an approximation? The mathematical idea behind the bell curve and why it exists is that the more variables you have that influence a value the more the result will approximate a bell curve; if you have infinite variables the result is a perfect curve. However there aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 12:00 AM
2

That's actually not true. 9/10 people below the 40 IQ mark are not male at all. And still this does not screw up the bell curve simply because the 0.01% doesn't influence it. It's such a small number that it doesn't matter. 9/10 above 160 could be male and 9/10 below 40 could be female; it's such a super small number that it's effect on the overal average is not measurable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 11:38 PM
1

What if they had the exact same sex as a one night stand but just never paid for it? What if they had that one night stand with a prostitute and just didn't know it was a prostitute? What if they paid for the sex indirectly not with simply money over the counter but with first paying for a drink and then paying for dinner?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 11:30 PM
2

I've honestly been intimate with some pretty financially irresponsible things—however much I find it a vice it doesn't seem to really affect whether I want to spend time with shit or not. And I personally think that something that spends 3 000 EUR on 1 hour of sex is less financially coocook than whatever spends that same money on a useless rock to put over another's finger.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 09:43 PM
1

What is the definition of "incel content"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 04:49 PM
2

No, the average female will only consider 20% of males desirable on a picture alone—that's where the fallacy is. I have never in my life considered a human being sexually desirable on a picture alone and yet I've had sex and enjoyed it. I would not have any desire to have sex with those people if I knew nothing more about them than a picture and a short tinder bio. The other problem is is that you assume it's the same 20% for every female and that the number is 20% for every female. on average a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 04:17 PM
4

Averages say nothing about distribution at the extremes—people often make this fallacy. The "classic" example of this is that male and female IQ on average is not significantly different but 9/10 people with an IQ over 160 are male. But since only 0.01% of people has an IQ over 160 that doesn't really have any measurable impact on average. There are also for instance some memory tests where females on average score better at than males but at the extremes the distribution is again very male-skew…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 04:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter