TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

starvinggarbage Archive

View 0 posts and 153 comments by starvinggarbage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The JJ Abrams sequels are directly plagiarized from the originals. That's my beef with them. But im also able to admit that if i was a member of the target audience i likely wouldn't notice or care that Abrams is a hack. I'd be staring in wide-eyed wonder at all the cool and colorful shit, thinking Rey is awesome, and wondering why Poe made my PeePee tingle. Rian got a ton of flak but at least his movie was original. He was tasked with writing a way out of the corner Abrams put him in and he gav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 02:40 PM
1

Exactly, which is why everyone whinging about Rey who doesn't accept the same Macguffin hand wave explanation for her feats that they blindly accepted for Luke in an almost identical story is being wt best disingenuous and at worst blindly chauvinistic. Its fine to dislike the sequels. There are plenty of legitimate gripes to have with them, but the endless and incessant whining about Rey being too strong is obvious and total bullshit because all of the same complaints can be applied to a male c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 02:26 PM
1

Thats like a drag racer also being the best fighter jet pilot in the world on his first try. And a wizard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 01:39 AM
1

Then watch movies aimed at adults.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 07:05 PM
-1

Luek was the best starfighter pilot in the galaxy his first time in a ship bigger than a landspeeder and was able to telekinetically redirect a torpedo going at least twice as fast as his fucking starfighter with the force to destroy the most powerful weapon ever made. Rey was able to fix a ship because she works on ships for a living. Luke was a dirt farmer. Luke, from a desert world, becomes an icon of the rebellion during a battle to destroy a superweapon, then tracks down and trains with an …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 07:03 PM
1

Ezra trained with a padawan who was never knighted. Rey trained with the most powerful jedi master of all time. Luke and Rey has nearly identical character arcs. Movies have shorter training times because they don't get multiple seasons to show progress. Neither characters story would have been vastly more compelling with Rocky style training montages, nor would that fit the style or tone of the films, and if they had done that you would whine about that instead. You finding Luke compelling and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 04:34 PM
1

And Luke blows up the death star with the force despite never piloting a starfighter before and knowing about the force for like 2 days tops in episode 4. Rey is very on brand for the series. Her story in TFA is almost identical to Luke's in New Hope, because the whole fucking movie is plagiarized from it because Abrams is a fucking hack. If i was 12 when i saw TFA i would probably love it. The SW films are kids movies designed to sell toys. Y'all are overly critical of the sequels because you'r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 04:26 PM
2

Enola Holmes is a kids movie. Rey fights kylo when he's grievously wounded by a bowcaster, previously shown to be basically portable artillery capable of hurling an armored opponent thirty feet or more. This whole thread seems like a case of confirmation bias. Shitty feminist writing exists, but so does compelling storytelling. The magicians is a great example of a recent show full of compelling, flawed characters of the male and female variety. Those woke as fuck shows and movies generally fail…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 03:57 PM
2

I think you're just consuming shitty media and/or suffering confirmation bias. Obviously there are plenty of stories like that, but there's plenty of good shit out there too. Even the Rey complaint doesn't really hold true. She needs help all the time. She needs training which she screws up a lot, she needs Ben's help a few times, she gets captured at least twice. Those movies are poorly written in general but its not because of feminism. The Abrams movies are just plagiarized pretty much direct…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 03:47 PM
6

A friend of mine learned the hard way that his early childhood education degree was worthless when he was fired a week onto his first job because parents weren't comfortable with a man teaching young children.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:30 PM
-9

Your uncle is one of the richest 2% of earners in America. He'll be fine. 20% isn't nearly as brutal as what most guys face in these biased divorces. At that level of income he could still easily scale back his lifestyle and live more modestly for a while and still retire younger than 99% of people. Its certainly still fucked up, and i bet its more than a little frustrating, but its not even in the ballpark of the most egregious examples available.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 01:41 PM
28

Their rule1 policy actually reads that it protects against harassment based on vulnerability or identity. Unless they are arguing that being white or male isnt part of an identity, they are violating their own policy. The admin also implies that being minority or female is an inherent vulnerability, which i know many folks in both camps would resent.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:37 PM
1

They could argue that the criminals who shoot him shouldn't be punished for it since he should be able to take it, despite him feeling the full pain or every gunshot just as a mortal would. They constantly tell him to man up when hes wounded because that's what they expect from their heroes now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 04:39 AM
0

During most mature adults lives they learn behave with logic and reason. hopefully you'll get there in time, as your brain fully develops.
/r/PussyPass23/07/20 02:50 AM
0

Hopefully you'll understand when you're older.
/r/PussyPass23/07/20 02:20 AM
0

You have a child's understanding if things and a child's capacity to understand. You're a child and shouldn't be getting caught up in QAnon conspiracy shit.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 11:56 PM
0

You're an actual child. You need to get off the internet for a while, kid. You're letting it make you dumber.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:48 PM
1

Legit, are you 12? Serious question
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:45 PM
1

Al those say is QAnon claims she did it because some people named jon and chrissy rode on Epstein plane once. No last name, no actual evidence of any kind.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:44 PM
0

Twitter has no nudity ban. Pornatars post their scenes on there. Take up their content policy with them. Shes still done nothing wrong that you can prove except possibly say a pregnant lady was big and be mean to Lindsay Lohan
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:40 PM
0

You have to prove guilt, not innocence. You cant do that so you should shut the hell up.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:38 PM
0

So now shes responsible for controlling the behaviour of all the kids in the world, too? It's just some boobs. The US is one of the only countries that even bothers censoring them.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:37 PM
0

Prove it.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:33 PM
0

Because none of her actions support the idiotic claims you're making. Showing her own tits is her own business. She isnt a kids show host or something. Shes just some lady. Women are allowed to show whatever they want of their own bodies.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:32 PM
0

Then you should probably stop obsessing over her. She isnt a pedo and you have no real reason to discuss her in this sub
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:30 PM
0

Are you just some stalker then?
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:28 PM
0

I never defended the body shaming, I just said it obviously doesnt make her a pedophile. And the gay marriage thing was so obviously a joke, the fact that you're still failing to grasp it means you're either arguing in bad faith or you're on the spectrum. It's fine if you are, but if that's the case you should probably just take my word for it that its a joke
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:25 PM
0

Cool, so this is never gonna end even though you deleted the post because it was so obvious how wrong you were. Cool.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 10:06 PM
0

Your inability to detect humor or sarcasm is not evidence of criminal behaviour or intent. You keep saying we're done here but you keep coming back. Explaining this to you over and over is exhausting
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 09:59 PM
0

You cant just make baseless accusations of pedophilia.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 02:43 AM
0

The gay marriage tweet is painfully, obviously sarcasm. If you didnt know that then you ought to stay off the internet in general.
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 12:22 AM
0

r/ihadastroke
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 12:08 AM
0

You have a real talent for deliberately misunderstanding things. It shows an incredible weakness of character
/r/PussyPass22/07/20 12:07 AM
0

We'll call that progress
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 11:10 PM
0

I read them all. Please tell me which one supports your absurd claim.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 10:37 PM
0

You called it proof despite it proving absolutely nothing, so now I'm just gonna say it flat out: you're a liar and probably a troll.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 08:38 PM
12

Yeah it really does warrant deletion. OP is being a tool about it. He posted more evidence that he didnt actually read
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 07:38 AM
14

Shes clearly implying that the show feels like child pornography. In case you weren't aware, both the producers and consumers of porn are sent to prison. You want this to be something it isn't because you just don't like this woman.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 05:46 AM
28

OP is full of shit in their replies to you. Chrissy Teigen is a former model who is now married to John Legend. She made some mean tweets about some celebrities around 2009-2011 but nothing that could really be considered creepy like OP is implying. This post is the sort of thing the downvote button was invented for.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 03:19 AM
7

Literally absolutely nothing in that article supports her being creepy about kids. It's extremely poorly-written, but the worst things she is accused of there is fat shaming pregnant Mariah Carey and making fun of Lindsay Lohan. You clearly didnt even read your own evidence.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 03:15 AM
2

It is doing the exact opposite. Its implying the content of the program makes her feel like a criminal just from watching it. Its a pretty obvious condemnation of the program. You're reaching here and missing completely. If you have actual proof of her being creepy post that, but this isnt it.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 03:02 AM
10

It's about child beauty pageants. The entire industry is fucked up pedo bait. The title alone should pretty much give it away.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 02:58 AM
22

If those incriminating tweets exist share them instead. This post doesnt fit the sub because it's not clearly condoning or endorsing the creepy show.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 02:49 AM
27

I mean I dont follow her but theres nothing pertaining to the topic of this sub in the tweets you've provided.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 02:41 AM
50

I still dont aee that an an implication of pedophilia. It seems to further point towards her suggesting she show is fucked up, and thus scary enough for an Halloween costume.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 02:33 AM
27

Play them in what?
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 02:29 AM
333

It seems more like she is commenting on how fucked up and exploitative thencontent of that show is.
/r/PussyPass21/07/20 02:17 AM
1

Tell her you don't appreciate being misquoted in an academic capacity. A professor should know better.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 11:07 PM
2

Ducks are made of wood
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:40 PM
2

"we don't hate men, we just named everything bad in the world after them."
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:39 PM
110

Pretty sure she got kicked off the show and prosecuted for it
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:54 PM
0

The victims brother asked her to. This isn't as big a deal as y'all want it to be. Though it's probably true that the brother was easier on her because of her gender and her ten year sentence is absurd, those weren't calls the judge made. All the judge did was honor the wish of one of the family members of the victim.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:22 PM
2

https://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwinteriscoming.net%2Ffiles%2F2017%2F03%2FBronn.jpg&c=sc&w=736&h=485
/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:36 AM
45

On 30 rock they did a season long arc about a guy who had fallen in love with his teacher who stat-raped him when he was like 13. Pretty sure they end up married. The rape victim married the rapist. And no one was really upset about it at the time. Tina is a great writer but she really has a big blind spot when it comes to men's issues and has never really made an effort to understand them.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 02:07 PM
21

The NYPD spends $230 million a year on settlements for police misconduct cases. Hopefully if that number gets much higher they'll start taking the problem seriously.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:20 AM
3

They lose their jobs when they cause lawsuits that cost the school district money. Not much else gets them fired. The government doesn't pay attention to our problems until they get too expensive.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:19 AM
13

It probably isn't an actual shell. Looks like a ceremony so the thing is just loaded to make smoke and noise
/r/PussyPass13/07/19 02:34 PM
13

Well Nikki Glaser already did a decent but about her butthole so Amy will probably just steal that
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:03 AM
4

Him and a bunch of the other stars did a sneak preview for the Marines for Expendables 2 on Camp Pendleton. I was public affairs for 1st MarDiv at the time. He was raw class. He hyped the movie like I'm sure his contract demanded, but he also talked to people straight up. I tried to stay out of his way but I couldn't help but overhear him just being a really nice guy. Also he can do his pec flex dance through a bullet proof vest. It can stop an AK-47 but not his pecs He pulled one dude aside and…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:42 AM
1

All he did was advocate role models teaching kids how to be well-rounded individuals. Twitter killed it from there
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:04 AM
1

Only if you assume that all of the remaining 20% are make, which you're obviously doing based on nothing. And you still haven't explained how this would show the opposite of my point to be true, forcing me to conclude you're full of shit and talking out of your ass. As far as I'm concerned you've lost the right to be treated as an equal in this conversation. If you can't stand by what you say or admit when you've spoken in error then you can't conduct an adult conversation.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:33 PM
0

Again, you're making an excuse for the figure, not disputing it. I don't care what justification you're making. You can try to explain it away but it will remain true. Mothers abuse their children more than fathers do. Using Gillette logic (the topic of this thread) that means mother's need to step up and stop other mothers from abusing their kids.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:30 PM
1

We can discuss that in your other reply chain. Right here you need to explain exactly how the fuck this link proves to opposite of what I claimed. Or you could just admit you were talking out of your ass.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:26 PM
0

How in the fuck are you getting that it supports the opposite? You're just making excuses for the disproportionate rates, but the rates themselves are not in question. I've explained the numbers to you simply and clearly. The mother's rate is significantly higher than the father's. The link is not ambiguous on that.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:46 PM
0

You're ignoring that the majority of people committing this crime are of a specific gender its not a study about parents, it's a study about abuse. It includes information about the rates at which parents of each gender commit abuse. But even if it were, a study about parents would inherently include gender because (excluding a small percentage of cases) there will be one parent of each gender for each child. Whether the father is allowed to see the child is not a part of this study and does not…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:41 PM
1

That's not disengenuous. I included the 17.3% in the father's statistic too. If you want to play it like that then you have to acknowledge that only 22.1% was only the father. I didn't include that because I think it's deliberately misleading to make that claim while knowing the actual rate of paternal abuse is much higher, and it would create the false impression that mothers are nearly twice as likely to abuse children than fathers are, when in reality it's closer to a bit less than 50% more l…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:29 PM
3

"According to NCANDS, a 2005 study showed that 79.4% of child abusers were the parents, and the next largest pool of abusers consisted of unmarried partners of the parents of child victims. A whopping 40% of child victims were abused by their mothers acting alone, and a disturbing 17.3% were abused by both parents." 79.4% were parents. 57.3% of abuse included mother's as the perpetrator and 39.4% included the father, while in a horrifying 17.3% of cases it was both of them. I don't know where yo…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:59 PM
4

I didn't take it that way, that's the literal content of the ad. It is description of what happens in the commercial.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:54 AM
9

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/somatic-psychology/201105/who-are-the-perpetrators-child-abuse?amp#referrer=https://www.google.com
/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:17 AM
13

Are they gonna do a commercial urging all women to stop each other from beating their kids since most child abuse is committed by females?
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:39 AM
20

More accurately it had the message "most men are cunts, you must stop them." A commercial advocating doing the right thing in any context wouldn't have been controversial. A commerical where there's 100 men watching children beat each other until only one snaps out of his idiot stupor to stop the violence isn't saying "some men." It's saying "by far the vast majority of men." Gillette sells women's razors too, right? Couldn't this have been a non gendered ad advocating everyone be good to each o…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:35 AM
45

It's merely highlighting the hypocrisy of preaching about toxic masculinity after profiting from it. Also the slavery stuff they've been tied to is pretty bad, but this post isn't about that.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:28 AM
2

Sexual assault is a different class of crime from rape.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:02 AM
3

This article is journalistic malpractice. It deliberately creates a false impression of events to prevent sympathy for a murder victim.
/r/PussyPass08/01/19 09:51 AM
2

That's an issue but definitely not the biggest. I'd say they need to work on taking all accusations seriously in general. For instance law enforcement agencies across America currently have tens of thousands of untested rape kits and nobody is making a very big deal about it. No one wants to cast police as the bad guys but they are dropping the ball pretty hard across the board when it comes to this stuff. Any time you cast police in a negative light you're immediately branded some sort of hippy…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 01:04 PM
68

Yeah, 2-4% is basically the rate at which accuseea admit they lied. The true figure is literally impossible to determine. The majority of reports of sex crimes do not result in a conviction. Unless you do an in-depth analysis of every single case you can't even begin to estimate the rate. Even if you could do all that there's shitkoads of cases that will just be one person's word vs another's. In those 50-50 calls there's no possible way to know. The best way to combat sexual assault is to make …
/r/MensRights09/10/18 11:41 PM
2

The five were innocent of the crime they were being accused of. They were all minors. The ad called for the death penalty for children. The police violated laws and procedures during pretty much every step of the investigation. There was much more than reasonable doubt. He basically beat Nancy Grace to the punch by quite a few years when it came to publicly jumping to conclusions on guilt without knowing nearly enough of the evidence and having no accountability placed on investigators. The idea…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:17 AM
1

You're advocating against the presumption of innocence for people who have been exonerated. You are exactly the opposite of what this post is supposed to be representing and your stance runs contrary to the very foundations of the sub. So if I'm coming off as rude it's because you're implying five men who have been found innocent are rapists and that's basically the shittiest thing you can do in this sub.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:08 AM
2

Dude I've read the ad. He wants the kids to be executed. He outlines it very clearly. And it wasn't the only time he talked about them I don't give a fuck about his other policies. That's not what this thread, post, or any of these comments have been about. On this matter he was wrong, was proven wrong, and doubled down on his wrong stance to the detriment of everyone else accused of a crime they did not commit. You're obviously a trumpite, and you lot of snowflakes can't handle any criticism of…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:38 AM
2

What the fuck are you talking about? That's what happened. Trump doesn't deny it at all.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:10 AM
1

So you've got a conspiracy theory for how they might still be guilty. How the hell is children a buzzword? It's a statement of fact. Only two things here actually matter: your admission that a guilty verdict was bullshit ("not reasonable") and the indisputable fact that Trump personally paid for a mass media marketing campaign to have them killed. Go back to the_donald. All the other flailing and flimsy, pathetic attempts at justification for that atrocity just reveal you to be the sniveling boo…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:37 PM
1

He's on a life sentence. He isn't getting paid. There were allegedly handprints all over her yet no physical evidence or dna from the five men was found? The whole point of this is that it's a problem that men are presumed to be guilty in these kinds of crimes, and here you are, doing exactly that. Because some guy you like, who has proven himself to be a pathological liar, did a thing that would have been morally repugnant even if they were guilty, and refuses to apologize for it. It's it prett…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 01:31 AM
3

They were legally exonerated, dipshit. Their convictions were vacated. That means the state admit their convictions were wrong. Their confessions were coerced and there was no evidence besides those confessions. The guy who did it's dna was always fucking there. They just didn't test him to match for it because they had already arrested a group of black and Hispanic teenagers and public opinion was against them because shit bags like Donald Trump's were taking out huge ads against them and tryin…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:12 AM
5

So you're saying you believe there is a conspiracy to exonerate these men? Sounds like you don't believe in the presumption of innocence, even after they have been proven innocent. In fact you're straight up saying that you don't and justifying Trump's campaign to have those men killed by suggesting that an absolute exoneration still isn't enough to create reasonable doubt for you. Maybe you would feel more at home in the_donald, because you don't belong here. **Edit- you also claim they could h…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:35 AM
8

Then go look them up. It isn't hard to find. The Central Park five was a huge story in the late eighties and he was asked again in 2016 and he doubled down on it.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:46 PM
5

No, he isn't. Read a few more comments until you get to the part where trump literally tried to have five innocent men executed over false rape charges. I am not making that up. He ran full page ads in the newspaper.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:41 PM
11

Sure. I was merely limiting my examples to the topic at hand, but if you expand it you can see the man is pathological.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:37 PM
6

Again, no one is trying to have a left vs right debate except you. That isn't the topic of this thread or of the comments you're replying to. Injecting your partisan politics into men's rights is detrimental to the entire cause, so knock it the fuck off. Everyone in politics will "believe" a victim acusing their political opponents because it's politically convenient. But as far as I know Trump is the only one who has tried to have innocent men killed for crimes they did not commit.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 02:20 PM
12

Trump took out full page ads advocating the execution of five innocent young men for a rape they didn't commit during an ongoing trial. I'm not talking about left vs right. Nobody here is except you. I'm talking about credibility, of which Trump has none, particularly on this issue given his down right horrifying track record on the topic. The only difference between Kavanaugh and the Central Park five is that Brett is rich, white, and has something to offer Trump. He isn't a champion for men's …
/r/MensRights27/09/18 02:12 PM
31

Didn't he take out newspaper ads against them? Full page ads advocating the execution of minors on unsubstantiated and ultimately proven false charges. This is not a man I want associated with any important causes.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:55 PM
69

He believes this when it's someone already on his side. He isn't taking a moral stand, he's taking an entirely political one. Long term having him associated with this message will probably do more harm than good, given his absolute lack of ethics.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:19 PM
5

The problem with vice is that they have an extreme passion for journalism and absolutely in training in it, particularly in the ethics department.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:06 PM
2

Wow, the comments on that article are absolute cancer. It looks like Fox news users are not a very enlightened group.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:07 PM
1

It's a way to contextualize the ridiculousness of the asinine claims on the other side that insist everything can be blamed on "toxic masculinity" When people realize how silly one term is they're forced to reevaluate the way they think of the other.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:20 PM
0

They're general terms that can cover many different things. They have an actual purpose, they're just often abused. You aren't going to win a war against language.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 07:06 PM
3

That's exactly what toxic masculinity is too. Which is the point. There are challenges and advantages for both genders and ways to exploit them for those with few scruples.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:24 PM
51

I'd say exploitation of a victim narrative is decidedly toxic and damaging to other women.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:04 PM
6

Not scripted but set up so the loser generally benefits from letting themselves be embarrassed on TV. My step sister was on one of these shows and the guy she was suing agreed because the show covered the cost of the judgement against him.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:17 AM
1

What he's describing is overt sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:06 PM
4

It means he gets away with it. It doesn't mean they consent, because he just said he doesn't wait.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:17 PM
3

"Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything........Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything."
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:04 PM
16

He did say in the same conversation that he does do it.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 05:47 PM
12

They have the right to that relationship, but not to have that relationship be free of influence from their other actions. He isn't denying her custody, she still has that as she is legally entitled to. She simply isn't legally entitled to have her kids love her or be protected from their opinions of her highly unethical behaviour. He hasn't denied her that relationship, but the nature of that relationship has been altered by her own actions. He has no responsibility, legally or morally, to lie …
/r/PussyPass01/06/18 10:39 AM
14

TIL it is unethical and wimpy to be honest with your children.
/r/PussyPass01/06/18 10:31 AM
6

I can't think of a single situation in which staying the truth is illegal outside of visiting NDAs. If you have irrefutable proof then there is no legal grounds for her to complain. If he lied to them she'd have a case. Facts are not illegal.
/r/PussyPass01/06/18 10:29 AM
7

Would you ever?
/r/PussyPass30/05/18 09:21 AM
3

Nah, he was the one questioning why they were singling it out as anti-woman. I'm just tacking on to his point.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 11:32 PM
-1

Singling it out as anti-woman is stupid though. It's anti-everbody.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 11:25 PM
0

Stopping the other thing is important too. Both because it makes room to have discussion that actually matter and because the j-law thing was a total fabrication that was predicated on lies and misinformation. Stopping lies from being spread is just as important as spreading truths when it comes to having healthy, honest dialogues about stuff like this.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:37 PM
1

Not really. Airtime is monopolized by trivialities and non-issues like the j-law pay thing. No one has time to shoulder all the world's problems. Focusing on those who actually need help rather than those who are just screaming into the wind from atop their mansions is vital if any meaningful amount of attention is gonna get focused on this stuff. And I'm not saying to stop talking about other real problems. I'm saying to stop talking about fake, bullshit problems. Especially those that, even we…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:50 PM
10

I think girls getting shot in the head and having acid thrown on their faces fir trying to go to school deserve people at least considering their situations. It's an actual problem women in a huge part of the world and no one, including American feminists, are doing anything about it.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:40 PM
31

Another critical thing about this is that it's international women's day. There are women all over the world suffering under horrifying systems and it gets no coverage in the west while Jennifer Lawrence getting less than Bradley Cooper for a movie she spent like 10% as much time working on is headline news for weeks. We need to bring the suffering of those women to the forefront of international women's day conversations.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:00 PM
-1

I actually suggested exactly the opposite of what you're saying I am. I was pretty clear about that, dipshit. I straight up said mixed gender infantry units wouldn't work and we need to follow the Israeli model. You're so eager to take the moral high ground you didn't even actually read my comment. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:12 AM
-1

They're plenty necessary, but what it takes for a man and a woman to be deployable is different. Bottom line is you're trying to compare military work to the private sector and it simply doesn't work like that. It isn't comparable. And the troops are sick of people using them to try to make their points. You can do it without them. The military will figure it out. They know what they need to do to complete their various missions. There are already plenty of stupid politics going on in the armed …
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:37 AM
1

That isn't the only job in the military. It takes a lot of different jobs and skills to keep that shit running.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 12:31 AM
0

I see what you're getting at but the military is not a for profit institution manufacturing push ups to sell. The purpose of pt requirements is not for the army as a whole to manufacture as many push-ups as possible. It is to keep troops ready to deploy should they be needed to do so. You can argue that the requirements should be higher so the female troops are better prepared for the possibility of combat, but anything outside of that argument doesn't matter. There output is MOS specific. For s…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 12:27 AM
4

Six. And all of the evidence is decade or more old statements so it's not "hard" considering how notoriously unreliable eyewitness testimony is even a few weeks after an incident and again the worst thing any have accused him of is "groping during a photo op" which can easily be explained as just awkwardness of to strangers trying to feign familiarity for a picture and getting wires crossed. And all of the women Al worked with in his years on SNL have defended him. This case is stupid, there's n…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:16 PM
76

You can be a sex offender for getting caught peeing in a bush.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:17 PM
3

While there might have been some amount of validity to the original notion that users announcing their gender are trying to get some of the social advantages of their gender in a quintessentially anonymous system, you'd have to be pretty disingenuous to claim that it actually works out that way. 4chan has never been a place the demonstrates much self control. This was true ten years ago and it's even more true now. Girls still get treated like royalty on the site by about half of it's userbase b…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 04:01 PM
1

I like that the problem is that it teaches kids it's possible for women to lie about being raped, as though that's something totally impossible in reality, and then barely a few sentences later she references the case of the Scottsboro boys, a case where exactly that thing happened to nine young men at once.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:46 PM
9

You're really doubling down on the act now. Catherine the Great waged a war against Persia only after their invasion of Georgia, which she was treaty-bound to defend. Her wars with Turkey were only a furtherance of the policy of her male predecessors. In the second Russo-Turkish War the Ottomans were the aggressors. Sir Walter Raleigh actually believed that Elizabeth I was far too cautious with her troops in her war against Spain (which was supporting rebellious catholic forces within her territ…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 03:45 PM
12

Are you just trolling? Because this is idiotic. I clearly said it can't account for all of it. I was extremely reasonable. I think you're a feminist posting on here to try to make MRAs look stupid.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:52 PM
1

Theres some good points in there, too.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:29 PM
17

Your logic is a gross oversimplification of history. The person declaring war is not always the aggressor. War is often declared in response to hostile acts by an enemy. As I said, it likely isn't what happened in every single case, but it most definitely accounts for some of the statistical difference.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:27 PM
300

I mean, as devil's advocate I've gotta say it's probably largely due to the fact that female leaders would be perceived as weaker by rivals, particularly in a time dominated by monarchy. When the neighbors get aggressive sometimes war is the best or only option. I'm sure there were plenty of times when women declared war for reasons more related to vanity or pride, but no moreso than with male rules. It's a pretty meaningless statistic, even when taken in historical context. It does nothing for …
/r/MensRights15/09/17 06:33 AM
1

Actually dictionary and legal definitions of words often vary wildly. But I'm assuming you already knew that. And again, it doesn't really matter in the slightest what you think about the legality of what she did. She had a trial and was found guilty. The sentencing guidelines are clear. In her state it should be 40 months minimum.
/r/PussyPass03/08/17 04:57 PM
1

Well that isn't what you were just arguing, but in this instance it was determined that her words were used with the intent to prompt the ending of a human life. I never said it was hate speech. It is manslaughter.
/r/PussyPass03/08/17 03:37 PM
2

Well she was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. 40-60 months is the base sentencing for that.
/r/PussyPass03/08/17 02:49 PM
1

"The base sentence forinvoluntary manslaughter under federal sentencing guidelines is a 10 to 16 month prison sentence, which increases if the crime was committed through an act of reckless conduct." It appears Massachusetts has its own crime severity ranking chart and that on it involuntary manslaughter is a level six, punishable by no fewer than 40-60 months prison time.
/r/PussyPass03/08/17 02:15 PM
3

Involuntary manslaughter is what she was convicted of. Notice I'm saying convicted. She wasn't simply accused, there was a trial and she was found guilty.
/r/PussyPass03/08/17 02:07 PM
4

Not always. Threats and cyber bullying can carry legal punishments on their own.
/r/PussyPass03/08/17 02:05 PM
9

She said she disagreed in the extreme with the other poster. I just pointed out that her experience at BC doesn't reflect the larger nationwide trends. Unless I'm just reading it wrong, which is entirely possible as I haven't been sleeping much lately. But even at BC women are enrolled at a much higher rate. In 2015-16 there were 4155 male full time students and 5742 females. Break that down by major and I'm sure some classes are male dominated but the point is it's not like the system is screwi…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:25 AM
17

It's a matter of fact that women attend college at higher rates than men. They don't out number them in every class and every major, but they do out number them overall for college enrollment and graduation rates nationwide.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:22 PM
5

"Acts of violence against women cause more death and disability than cancer, malaria, traffic accidents and war combined (UN Women 2010)." - from the action aid Australia "facts" Violence (including war) causes around 1.6 million deaths annually. In 2015 cancer killed 8.8 million people worldwide. Even assuming 100% of violence worldwide is against women and less than half of cancer deaths are women, this still isn't remotely close to accurate. And they still tacked on all traffic and malaria de…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 07:48 PM
11

You're exactly right. Elam doesn't do the best job representing his platform. I think she focused on him because of his role in getting her interested in the topic in the first place. Straughen was definitely the one who made the most compelling arguments and actually changed the way I see many things.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:31 PM
8

This is the dumbest thing ever said by any person in his sub. Millions suffer from depression and consider suicide every day. Just because they don't do it immediately doesn't mean it isn't a constant Danger for them and if they do in fact commit suicide it is largely in part due to the depression. It doesn't stop being a huge factor because some other people didn't kill themselves. Some people survive cancer. That doesn't make cancer not a real threat and it doesn't change the cause of death of…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 07:34 PM
0

Yeah. The body-shaming. You're being a dickhead. Dickheads don't contribute to the conversation. Comments like yours will be taken and used to discredit anything good any man here contributes to any conversation on any meaningful gender discussions. You don't think she's attractive? Fine, go about your business and don't start insulting her over it. Keep your idiocy locked up inside your own little head. Don't drag down an entire movement because you want to brag about how superior your taste in…
/r/MGTOW17/08/16 03:04 PM
0

So mighty.
/r/MGTOW16/08/16 01:27 PM
1

Have enough pride to be ashamed of yourself when you've been foolish.
/r/MGTOW15/08/16 06:55 PM
1

With body shaming? Yeah. It's just all around obnoxious, even when you aren't doing it to supermodels. And shit like this makes people not take this sub seriously. You're an embarrassment and you're contributing nothing to anything.
/r/MGTOW15/08/16 05:53 PM
0

She's a runway and print model, so your theory doesn't hold up under even a tiny amount of scrutiny.
/r/MGTOW15/08/16 03:02 PM
4

Yes, the woman who is professionally attractive and earns millions of dollars for being so is not up to your standards. You are mighty.
/r/MGTOW15/08/16 06:57 AM
6

Was hitting her boob worth criticizing at all? She chose to involve herself ina physical altercation by helping prevent a man from getting to his seat. And someone accidentally touched her a little while trying to you know, run a country.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 09:24 PM
1

That's really not a lot to her anymore.
/r/MGTOW04/05/16 06:44 AM
1

Pretty sure he outweighs her by like 200 pounds.
/r/MGTOW03/05/16 08:52 AM
2

The US women's national team? No. In fact, none of the women filing the suit are latin, and even if they were it would have nothing to do with how US women's soccer should be operated. Latin culture in absolutely no way whatsoever influences this.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:43 PM
2

What the hell does this have to do with latin culture? This is the US Soccer team, and this is a business. The employees bringing in the most money generally deserve the best pay. Obviously other factors should affect their pay (potential for growth, future plans for expansion, etc.) but for the most part that's how it works everywhere else in the world in every sport, industry, or culture.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:48 PM
1

If it is an outlier team than that specific team deserves more pay.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:00 PM
0

If that were the case the men's league would have already collapsed.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:58 PM
1

Physical violence is not a protected form of expression or free speech.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:01 PM
8

I mean, his writing isn't great. It sort of rambles but he doesn't cross any lines even in terms of political correctness, much less any legal lines. The only thing he is guilty of is bad writing, and at least he thought critically about each of his posts, which I doubt his peers did. At worst she should have given him a C or B and moved on.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:46 AM
1

If you weren't this case never would have gone to trial.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:36 AM
56

The same site has an article about how a woman had consensual sex in which she was hooking up with multiple people publicly, admits it was because she wanted the positive male attention, but she regretted it in the morning because she didn't like that she had enjoyed the male attention. And her solution is that the school needs to do something about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter