TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

steakmeout Archive

View 1 post and 102 comments by steakmeout on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

steakmeout/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 01:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The answer is maybe. I left this open for a day, it drifted up to 10 and down to 6. Downvotes are discouraged here and yet up to 10 and down to 6. Clearly there's shenanigans.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/14 08:20 AM
1

Are you implying they were only conducted within marriage? Are you implying that Western Christianity is the mono culture by which we judge all humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 11:27 AM
0

Please, explain your irrational reaction to reality. This should be entertaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 07:29 AM
1

Sex didn't usually lead to reproduction - have you ever looked at human population growth over time? Is mutual masturbation not sex? Oral stimulation not sex? Anal intercourse not sex? Etc. Etc. They are all sex too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 07:13 AM
2

Yes, and also the fact that sex has been decoupled from reproduction since reliable birth control. Sex has been an entity unto itself forever. Animals have sex for pleasure too. It's part of the natural order of things. Sex isn't only about reproduction. That you redpillers keep falling to that old chestnut is proof positive that you reorder reality as you see fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 06:56 AM
2

You keep making statements that aren't backed by evidence. You're so lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 05:51 AM
2

Cosmo is a magazine which is constantly derided by feminists and non feminists alike for being shallow and filled with irrational and nonsensical "advice". You don't need look far for evidence of that. Anyone rational can recognize irrational and nonsensical advice. Remember, it was you who made the comparison to Cosmo. Not I. You're problem is you see everything that isn't you as a nail and yourself as the hammer. Really, if anyone's perspective is in need of reordering, it's yours. You're lost…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 05:50 AM
2

It really only says something about you. You are lost in the fiction of self help dogma. Oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 05:42 AM
2

There's nothing "normal" about that RPW post. It's an attempt to engage in programming - both the female reader as a submissive and the male partner as if he's goddam Pavlov's Dog. It literally talks about putting him into "home mode". There is nothing natural about that at all. Have you not engaged in non programmatic interpersonal relations? Can you not discern the natural from the forced when it comes to interpersonal relations? I wonder if you would benefit from leaving the books alone and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/14 05:01 AM
1

Don't bother soliloquizing to the audience, you lost the debate. Deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 03:49 AM
1

You said :- So that "PUA" book that got banned And yet there was no book banned at all, for no book was published. It was some Seddit poster who tried to get a PUA book funded (with content he likely didn't own entirely, coming from the sub collectively) and that content had issues. When they were brought to light Kickstarter pulled the project, as is their right. I'm not a victim. You can't oppress me. And yet you continue to paint yourself as one. Cartoons, the lot of you. Hilariously sad cart…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 03:10 AM
1

So that's not a publisher, is it? That's Kickstarter. He didn't have a publisher, nor did he get one and his book isn't banned, his funding exercise was. Kickstarter removed his project in direct response to public scrutiny and criticism. It's funny how you guys ALWAYS distort the truth and paint yourselves as victims of oppression. Oh and look, he's a seddit person. One of your own. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 01:45 AM
1

Dude, you're repeating yourself with ever more sophomoric reasoning. Why do you Redpillers constantly try and paint yourself as victims? What's the book's name? The supposed article that got it banned? What's the weather like in your reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 01:29 AM
5

When TRP members wish death and violence on women and these comments have been heavily upvoted? These happen and they are not generalisations which are unfair to malign TRP with - they are accurate depictions of your member base. There is a constant stream of threats of violence on women from TRP. And we constantly report on these and we will continue to do so. And you continue to whine that we're mischaracterising you as a group when what you should really be doing is singling these negative co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/14 01:16 AM
2

That no matter how fucked you think my theories are, im in a happier more fulfilling relationship than you will ever be in You sound incredibly immature and insecure. You're breaking frame all over the place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/14 09:25 AM
1

It's not a competition. I just don't find anything you do entertaining or funny and I think your poor spelling, crappy sense of humour and lacking empathy are more indicative of your lack of intellect than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 11:02 AM
1

No. You're just not funny. You get bonus points for being from the UK and not being able to spell.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 10:36 AM
1

Mate, you're deluded. And really not funny. You're also kind of fucked in the head, looking at your post history.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 10:09 AM
0

Again, I'm not sad - you're just not funny. You shared what you consider to be a joke after you attempted and failed to knock me down a peg. I didn't think it was funny then and I continue to think it's not funny now. Why is it that you're so invested in this? You're obsessed with me liking your shit joke. It's creepy. It's sad. You're really sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 09:55 AM
1

God, how desperate are you? A typo, your fragile little ego hinges on a typo. You're sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 09:43 AM
1

Nah mate, you're just not funny. Whatever upvotes you earned were through sycophancy, nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 09:34 AM
0

I'm not angry at all. And I quoted your "joke" right? I just don't think you're funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 08:47 AM
-1

I think we've seen how much value to constructive conversation you have to offer already... That sentence doesn't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 07:48 AM
0

Not at all. You'll notice the only thing we agree on @ TBP is how fucking stupid TRP is. In fact, it's almost the sole context of conversation. Just because you're in a stupid cult, don't assume everyone else in another.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 07:48 AM
4

Oh of course. Such deliberate misconstrue. Wow No, it's just the only thing of substance anyone can get. No one gives a fuck about "consent" because it's a meaningless topic made up by women. No amount of education on rape or consent is going to change women's feelings toward rape or consent because they literally rely on the human race functioning in a different fashion than it currently does. Rape is the natural by product of the sexual dynamic between men and women, and consent is a wishy was…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 02:01 AM
1

Which "joke" exactly? This one? pretty sure autocorrect doesnt count as a freudian slip Oh man. Hilarious Or this? sadly no, I'm just a mere mortal compared to the dark prince GayLubeOil, but I'm hoping his divine oil will spray onto me Yeah man. Comedy. Gold. You're so funny!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 01:24 AM
-1

No, Here's what happened. I questioned fucktard mcfuckknuckle in his AMA. You offered to blow him to prove his manliness and asked me to watch. I declined and said that you're silly to ask for my input as I already clarified that I don't think much of him. You continued to fellate him and I said you're an idiot for doing so - only because you asked for my opinion. And since then you've fallen to gamesaying and cited that as your superior humour and because I don't agree with you or your pathetic…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 11:28 PM
0

For a Redpill you're decidedly unwilling to accept personal responsibility and recognise the need for self development. Blaming the world for your shortcomings isn't going to make your dick any bigger or your face any less ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 11:11 PM
1

Splitting hairs won't save you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 11:01 PM
-1

You have extremely poor delivery if you think you're funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 11:00 PM
-1

Look at that - push ups in primary rep position! What a shocker. I bet you look like a weedy fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 09:01 PM
-1

Look to your favoured sub No one gives a fuck about "consent" because it's a meaningless topic made up by women. No amount of education on rape or consent is going to change women's feelings toward rape or consent because they literally rely on the human race functioning in a different fashion than it currently does. Rape is the natural by product of the sexual dynamic between men and women, and consent is a wishy washy concept because no one can read another person's mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:58 PM
-2

Neither of which are extending the arms forward. Presses largely activate the pecs.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:55 PM
-2

Bullshit. Flies are for delts and lats. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:22 PM
-2

Oh look, vague racism. Shocking.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:20 PM
-4

Honestly, do a regimen of pushups and sit ups ever morning and night. Start at 3x 30 reps and eventually move to 5 x20 with crunches or 5x 30. That should be your base regardless of any other workouts you may do. Train the habit. Your muscle memory is what will matter as you move forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:19 PM
-4

So then you admit to not being manly enough without assistance, interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:14 PM
-1

That doesn't answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:09 PM
-6

Is that before or after you blame your shortcomings on feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:09 PM
-1

I think you sound like a sycophant to a narcissistic fool. Who's more the fool? The self deceiver or the fool who follows him?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:04 PM
-3

I made myself abundantly clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 07:58 PM
-1

Yes you do. You also generally deny it exists and you only seem to recognize it as if it's some ploy to through which women deny you rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 07:55 PM
-1

Yawn
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:32 PM
0

Pseudo...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:23 PM
1

Spoken like a true pseudo-intellectual.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:20 PM
-1

Anyone is a mere mortal when compared with a work of fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:01 PM
1

Is...is that you GayLubeOil? Heh
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 01:40 PM
1

It's pretense of the former in aid of the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 01:39 PM
-5

Oh goaway-o
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 12:11 PM
-2

You know why he used the word "shitlord" right? I bet you have no idea. You're out of your element, Donny.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 11:38 AM
-1

Here, have some context.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 10:17 AM
0

That is exactly my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 09:04 AM
0

I have no patience for it. Formidable as a wet fart. Watch out ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:54 AM
-2

Dude, you need to stop living vicariously through reddit/tumblr drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:52 AM
-3

You idiot, that's a joke. You know, like every other piece of advice from TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 08:47 AM
0

Uninterested in skyping with you. The burden of proof is on you. Its all on the table. That what you said. Make a video, let us see your face, your gf, your lifestyle, how much you lift etc. That way I don't need to share any info with an idiot who I've aggravated.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 03:10 AM
2

It's just that you're not very interesting. All of your answers can be summed up as "glib response because I'm not that clever".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 03:09 AM
2

Blank out your faces. Wear paper bags over your heads. Etc. Just show me proof that you're actually a fit, healthy male in a relationship with a fit, healthy woman. Otherwise, stop wasting people's time with this fiction and admit that you're a lying, self aggrandizing idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 03:01 AM
-4

Make a video, let us see your face, your gf, your lifestyle, how much you lift etc. Your threats of rape are just boring and ineffectual - like the person who makes them. Figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:55 AM
3

So what you're saying is that you don't take Red Pill seriously at all and that you're not a real person? Cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:47 AM
3

I'm not interested in vague threats of rape. Make a video, let us see your face, your gf, your lifestyle, how much you lift etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:30 AM
2

Reliving...your Freudian slip is showing. I posit that you're not a real person. Prove me wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:08 AM
4

Making a cheeky pose for the camera? Of course, the Marx Brothers never did that! That dude's whole persona in that shot pays homage to Groucho. That's the whole point. Same angle, same cheeky grin. As for makeup and drawn brows, here. Groucho had that look all the way through the 50s, 60s and 70s until he died. He hadn't drawn on his brows for decades. And you did ignore Prince, sliding him into Glam Rock does his music a huge disservice. It's not even the right genre. Like Morris Day and The T…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/14 09:49 PM
2

The facts are that benevolent sexism improves life satisfaction. No, that's one tested context for a small set of subjects in sample. It's not a fact anymore than the statement that "we're the only intelligent life in the universe" is a fact. Neither are facts. "The long term effects" they cite as negative are nothing but their own assumptions, based on their feminist frame. Rubbish, we have have proven historical data which shows that exclusionary contexts produce long lasting negative effects …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/14 09:15 AM
2

Classic TRP argumentation - at first you claim the paper (which you clearly did not read) as evidence and when it proves to go against your claims (because, again, you didn't take the time to read it) you dismiss it as "feminist". You haven't argued anything, you've just made a statement which has so far been propped up with an aphorism and now this paper which you first used and then dismissed. It doesn't matter what you do or do not buy into, it matters what you can prove with research and evi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/14 06:15 AM
2

You can't claim the study's conclusion as your justification when clearly didn't even take the time to read the summary. To whit:- The results imply that although benevolent sexism perpetuates inequality at the structural level, it might offer some benefits at the personal level. Thus, our findings reinforce the dangerous nature of benevolent sexism and emphasize the need for interventions to reduce its prevalence. In other words the personal benefits are short term while over the longer term th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/14 04:31 AM
6

No, even if it's relevant it doesn't make a point. Aphorisms are a tool of the limited. They are an attempt to sound authoritative and always fall flat. In your example, you're trying to justify exclusionary tactics with a simple adage -- that everything comes at a cost -- and therefore whatever cost is involved in providing your exclusionary tactics would exist somewhere else. Yet, this isn't true. /u/soulcakeduck makes the point that the "price" need not be paid at all, that if everyone was po…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/14 11:09 AM
6

Does an aphorism make a point? There's oxygen in air and water.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/14 10:31 AM
1

Quick, I better report you. You said I smell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 02:05 PM
7

Implying that men don't have drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 07:53 AM
1

I was illustrating that you enjoy some biased materials and ideas (and heroes) and that the people who would likely agree with you(r bias) are more likely to be TRP subscribers than others. By proxy you may be more likely to agree with TRP subscribers than others. One of the key attacks of TRP is on "feminism" by reasoning that it has disempowered the "male" archetype and is thus ruining society. The site you linked does the same using the same arguments. Then you link an article which is biased…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 04:34 AM
1

Thanks for your helpful feedback. I will make sure to keep it in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 04:12 AM
1

It's biased and filled with misinformation. I already detailed that in that thread. I'm sure you can look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 04:11 AM
1

Which then begs the question, are TRP members not alpha enough to handle some criticism?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 02:08 AM
1

In case I wasn't clear, that was said in jest and was a criticism of pillburt's statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 02:04 AM
1

Is that a serious question?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 02:01 AM
1

There does seem to be some bias on your part as we don't see you taking TRP members to task and definitely not as aggressively. See, you say that me calling out someone as a creep (seriously, look at that thread, the behaviour speaks for itself) is not ok but someone else telling someone that they might have a mental disorder from reading one post is fine (because something about people reading or something?). There's definitely something up and you can call it being busy but you are clearly exh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 01:00 AM
1

I don't have to prove anything. You just haven't been around here long enough to drop your persecution complex yet. Hmmm redditor for 4 months Not your first account here then? And yes, you do have to prove you're not biased because if you cannot there will be people who will rightly campaign for you to step down, I would think.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 12:44 AM
1

You seem to have a problem with authority. Have you been tested for Schizophrenia? You seem to have the markers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 12:26 AM
2

The accusations of bias are really old and tired too. That doesn't make them incorrect. Take some redpillers to task from time to time. Prove your lack of bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 12:23 AM
2

I speak about you now. I don't speak to your history. And as of now, there's a lot to comment on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/14 11:12 PM
0

Femisists are biological and they require oxygen. Ipso facto humans are fire. Are you questioning logic? If so I will get some water and end you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/14 10:32 PM
3

That sounds more like an answer begging for a question. It's telling that you've linked from an MRA blog. Here's what really happened, as cited in non biased form by The Sydney Morning Herald The University of South Australia has distanced itself from a proposal for a series of male studies courses, some of which were to be taught by hardline anti-feminist advocates. Read the rest of article. Among those named was American lawyer and self-described anti-feminist Roy Den Hollander, who filed a la…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/14 10:29 PM
4

You RP too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/14 09:31 PM
0

RP is a pyramid scheme which is essentially a playground bully system with Roosh and "lieutenants" at the top. Guidelines are delivered and it's "up to the individual" to follow them - the truer to the guidelines you are, the more alpha you're judged as and the more praise you get. The less true to the guidelines the more beta you're judged and the more derision you receive. Like any pyramid scheme, it relies on its participants to have exploitable weaknesses and in this case, there's little mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 02:27 PM
10

More is more. You keep playing a game of numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 08:16 AM
5

The question was who, not how many. The question implies a measure of quality as in Who are the kinds of women who want a guy who's never learned any of the tools of relationship navigation, who's never shown a capability for commitment and who seemingly doesn't seem interested in coupling. I understand that you feel your vagina ownership gives you some authority to answer but you really need to think of yourself statistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 06:18 AM
11

Barely Do you recognise that you dismiss evidence which disproves your dogma? Do you think about why you do that? Do you worry that you're self deceiving? Do you worry that you're self deceiving because you find you're running out of excuses to accept the dogma which you clearly can't prove? I ask because I wonder whether you have broken your cognitive function.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 06:11 AM
2

Of course it is. If I declare myself a monkey and act like a monkey, I may not be a monkey, but to myself I am a monkey. Objeticvely, I am still a human being but that's irrelevant to how I choose to be perceived (by myself and others). The same thing applies to any epithet, moniker, gender, religion or definition a person chooses to identify as. A person declaring themselves a Red Pill Man is objectively a fucktard to me but to them they are defining themselves by a set of rules and guidelines …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/14 10:03 AM
0

Sounds like two idiots destined for each other. Honestly, if you so desire yourself as to see yourself clever as to "try" and out think a deluded fool, then you'll get what you deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/14 09:55 AM
1

Tenuous implies a desire to understand. There's no desire for understanding in TRP - the stock in trade is obfuscation via jargon and acronym all in aid of projecting and elevating some very basically wrong ideas cloaked a sea of misdirection, contradiction and confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/14 09:51 AM
0

Yes, I mind.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 03:02 AM
1

Interesting that you think I took it personally because I used strong language. Interesting that you continue to ignore my critique and calls for proof by harping on about my argumentation technique. Interesting that after all of this you fall to a word like butthurt. Sorry I wasted your time. I thought I was dealing with a stubborn younger adult when it's clear I'm dealing with a child.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 12:09 AM
0

because your argument isn't even an argument, it's a statement followed by another supporting statement. If I don't agree with the first statement why should my dissent be mislabled as a strawman? It shouldn't. It's not a strawman. It's a valid critique of your primary statement. That you don't like my critique doesn't make it invalid. You are calling people collectively X for doing Y and I am reiterating that people doing Y are not X. You call that a strawman so you don't have to justify your p…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 03:37 PM
0

Again, this from a person whose whole argument is that faceless people who do good things with good cheer are making his life harder and should therefore be insulted using chauvanistic terminology.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 03:20 PM
-1

Of course you don't read that as a rebuttal. You're mired in confirmation bias. And of course you can't deal with real aggression, you prefer fictionalised passive aggression where faceless groups ruin your life. Wuss.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 02:55 PM
-1

Oh please. You cannot claim intellectual superiority, nor that you do not use ad hom when your entire idea is based around a character assasination of a group of people whose innocent behaviour you attempt to shape as a negative context which somehow worsens your life. You are literally dealing in ad hom when you single out a group of people as "nice guys" and define them "sluts". That is literally a "to the man" attack based on defining people in a pejorative context. And you're doing so AS IF …
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 02:31 PM
-2

She says "let's get Chinese", you think "No, I'm going to disagree with whatever you say and instead just get in the car and start driving to Italian to show how little I've pedestalized you and how Don't Give a Fuck I am." So Frame Control is ignoring what another person wants, not engaging in dialogue and just doing something else as a knee-jerk reaction? That sounds a lot like being a petulant child monster rather than being in control. Reacting to every given piece of potential interaction w…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 07:43 AM
-1

You're whole diatribe is defined by ad hom. You literally define nice men as "easy sluts". If you deal in the pejorative be prepared to be dealt with in the same manner. And you clearly don't understand what it is that women want at all. You define them as a collective, rather than as the individuals they really are and that means that all you see them as is what you classify their desires as being and meaning. That's a form of delusion. You're clearly very limited in experience. I hope, for you…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 02:29 AM
-2

The idea that you define people by what they do and don't share in completely subjetive and specifically subjetively negative contexts is pretty selfish and sad. There's a definite air of insecurity in the way you seem to single out and define "nice-guy" as a pejorative term to besmirch with a negative connotation of being "easy", as if to say that being "easy" with good cheer and pleasant behaviour is bad. It's also a lie. You're trying to turn the tables on reason and logic and supplant them w…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 04:54 PM
0

Excessive junk food availability does though. Your analogy seems to exist in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:44 PM
4

You need to come out of the closet.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter