TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stedtler3 Archive

View 5 posts and 73 comments by stedtler3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Wouldn't women with Chad husbands find them more attractive? Most women don't have Chad husbands. 80% of men are considered unattractive by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:55 PM
1

Actually it does because women are more horny during this period, not less.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:23 PM
5

It's referring to the menstrual cycle. If you're bringing up pregancy, you're missing the point of the study. When women are NOT pregnant and most fertile, they are less attracted to their husband, likely because he is not the physical specimen who she'd want to procreate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:19 PM
2

Not accessible. Give me a quote out of this at debunks it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:17 PM
-1

The guy who considers journals from slate to be science is calling me an ideolog lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:16 PM
3

When she is most fertile, she doesn't like him as much. It means she'd rather have a Chads baby when most fertile, not from an inferior physical specimen. Yet, most women don't. I never said most women cheat. I said that women are MORE likely to cheat. It's inline with womens mating strategies which is to have Chads Child and Betabux's resources. Most women aren't doing this though. Women are wired this way. It explains all the sexless marriages. Women aren't sexually attracted to their husband …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:14 PM
-2

It's essentially a ploy for women to recieve a mans resources and commitment. Men who fall for it are stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:11 PM
1

Estradiol is negatively associated with women’s relationship evaluation and sexual desire toward their partner. This research from this study shows that ovulation clearly impacts a womans attraction to her husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:10 PM
0

The Slate article was arguing that these menstraution studies are sexist pseuodscience. That doesn't support my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:09 PM
0

SLATE? Ya, that's totally not a biased source. Give me journal articles. Not a far left article by some hyper-feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:01 PM
1

This study is recent. Other similiar studies have shown this too in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 09:00 PM
2

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051119302509?via%3Dihub Where is your link that debunks it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 08:14 PM
3

Looks are 90% of what people call personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:55 PM
1

Why is inwardly focused bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 04:46 AM
0

Yes, it is a social skill. But it's a very superficial on-the-surface social skill. You're saying we can completely assess one's social abilities on this one external trait. It's just dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:38 PM
1

The slimiest scumbags I know are AMAZING at small talk. Ted Bundy and fucking psycopaths are great at small talk. In on way is it a good assessment of social deficiencies. It's the most superficial social trait possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:37 PM
0

Who said it had to be science. It could be about small talk. A discussion on how much you hate small talk. That's fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:35 PM
0

Ok but one should understand that not everyone is good at that it. It doesn't mean they have dead bodies in their basement or they have nothing important to talk about or they have no personality. Small talk is hard for some people. To assess someone's character, personality, or even social skills on just this is asinine. It's a weakness that people should be more understanding towards. We all would benefit from looking past just small talk ability. It's not indicative of much in the long run. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:34 PM
1

It's not even entertaining. The whole point of small talk is just to fill in awkward moments of silence. You don't know what small talk is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:32 PM
1

you're just begging the question here.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:30 PM
1

Social skills =/= small talk either.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:06 PM
1

Small talk is not a showcase of true personality. It's just small talk. I talk about serious things with a lot of people in my circle. I'm not able to show myself that same way with small talk. It's a dumb way of vetting people. A lot of lot PUAs, fratboys, docuhebags are good at small talk. Then women complain that they can't find good men. You can't showcase yourself with small talk. There's a reason why it's SMALL talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:48 PM
1

Horse shit. Says who? I know countless people, especially the bros and frat boys who have good small talk skills but are awful at serious conversations. They can't even have a serious conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:46 PM
1

Don't agree. I see people who are less attractive who have more success than me with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:33 PM
1

Humans go beyond the natural. what feels good wins out. For stupid people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:30 PM
1

ya but all the personality in the world won't help if you can't get past that initial hurdle of flirting and small talk. Women are superficial with social skills. How can you even present or showcase your personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:29 PM
0

Ya but small talk is so dumb. It carries nothing in to the actual relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:27 PM
2

Initial small talk is not the best indicator of overall social skills. It doesn't even carryover to the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:26 PM
1

That's not what sexy son hypothesis is. That pertains to physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:16 PM
1

Well, they can't complain about their domestic abuse then. Flirting and communicating in a relationship are completely different. Flirting is just in the initial stage. People are uncomfortable with flirting, it doesn't mean they have that problem in the relationship. It's a dumb metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 08:56 PM
1

No it’s not just average guys with money who can get hot girls It is. I rarely see an average guy with a hot girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:33 AM
1

I disagree but let's suppose you're right. Most girls I see don't even give guys that chance to find that out. If they really cared about it, they wouldn't immediately rule guys out. BTW, meh guys at best get meh girls if they have more personality. Only meh guys with money get hot girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:08 AM
1

Wrong. They won't look for a guys personality if he isn't what they found attractive. Women don't emphasize personality any more than men do. They just date uglier guys sometimes because he has money.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:00 AM
1

I wouldn't date a girl who was a bitch either. What's your point. This doesn't prove that women are less visual or shallow?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:55 AM
1

Ya I know. People like you say they like confident men blah blah blah. That's bullshit. Physical features and money is their real emphasis. Personality isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:54 AM
1

You plugged that out of context. You're reading comprehension is poor unfortunately. My point is that it's a societal belief that women are less shallow/visual than men. I'm saying that's wrong. I don't actually believe women are angels.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:51 AM
1

It’s not as purely looks-based like men’s That's a false premise. Who said attraction for men is purely looks based? There's other factors. Several.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:49 AM
1

They are visual all the time. They just settle for less attractive men because of money. They are not being less visual, they are just compromising for wealth. They still don't find their LTR attractive. They just want his wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:48 AM
1

Because women find tall men attractive even if they are not standing next to them IRL. Tall itself is an attractive feature. Women find it visually more attractive. Can I ask this? Are you a man or woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:44 AM
1

I never said it did. What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:38 AM
1

Of course I'm shallow. Everyone is. That's called projection. Everyone factors in physical attractiveness but to screen out large numbers of people for one physical trait is shallow. You're just using angry words to say "everyone wants the best partner they can get". I'm sorry you weren't smart enough to understand what I'm saying. It's amazing how you view a persons height as the main thing you can do better. A taller man is the best that you THINK you've gotten because you screened out so many…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:14 AM
1

Lol, did you not read the title of this thread sir? My entire point is that women are not any less shallow or visual. What a low wattage reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:04 AM
1

No the original study still stands. Not to mention the Okcupid studies and plenty of other studies on dating. Go google them. They all point to height being the main factor. You have to be delusional to think that women don't emphasize height in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 12:01 AM
1

Brings not the view it gives That's already been debunked. Complete bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:56 PM
1

Lol WTF. My entire argument is that women are more shallow and you practically admit to it. Amazing. If men had throngs of big breasted women chasing them, then that's what they would take NOOOO. There are tons of super attractive men who choose to date flat-chested women. You think Brad Pitt or Chris Hemsworth can't get girls with massive tits? Guess what they don't. If I was more attractive, I wouldn't screen out all the flat-chested girls. It would just make me more hellbent on finding the gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:39 PM
1

It's not random, it's societal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:33 PM
1

They work differently but not in the way you suggest. They sleep around with the attracitve men on dating apps. They know that they can't tame or sucker these guys because he can just go and have more sexual conquests. It doesn't mean she will be less visual in the real world. you will initially triage them by the easiest and quickest criteria such as height or their first pic. Lol, that's literally what being shallow is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:32 PM
1

I didn't ignore it. The original study found that 1/720 UK couples existed where the man was shorter. The new study showed that this norm was only slightly violated. No the math makes sense. 1/40 is random. 1/720 would mean that it's not just due to randomness. You don't even know what you are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:21 PM
1

I don't fully agree. I accept evolutionary psychology 100% but it doesn't exist in a vacuum. Culture and society ties in to attraction as well. Part of what makes us human is to go beyond the animal nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:19 PM
1

WTF does that have to with my argument? I don't care if you get laid, good for you. My point is that women aren't any less visual.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:17 PM
1

Hollistic does not mean less visual. It just means they have to make compromise and date a rich average looking guy. Especially becuase they know that the tall buff bad boys won't commit to them. They can't tame them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:09 PM
1

5'10 is above average height. That's not short. You could literally lie to women and say you are 6 ft. A lot of them wouldn't know. no problems dating Online dating isn't like that. Women are brutal with height.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:06 PM
1

Except, I'm talking about long-term relationships. You're thinking of short-term mating.Men drop their standard for short-term relationships. I don't drop by standards for long-term relationships. Not physical or personality standards. It doesn't mean men are going to be ok with a cancerous person for the rest of their life. If they are going to slave away for one women, he might as well make sure she's worth it. You have to be quite delusional to treat big tits to height. Attractive women don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 11:04 PM
1

Lol, I just told you the math. Of course, I know that men are taller. I showed you that it couldn't be just by sexual dimorphism. My point is that women put a lot of emphasis on physical traits. Something, you didn't really challenge at all. Use your brain. From the looks of it, I'm the only one between me and you who has a brain. So yes, I will use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:57 PM
1

No if you used a brain for a second, you could see that it's part of my main argument that men are not any more shallow than women. So ya, I have to use the word. Sorry. I though it would be obvious but not for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:49 PM
1

Oh please, play me the worlds smallest violin. Women part around with all the jocks and studs while they are young and then they eventually sucker in an unfortunate provider when they're getting old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:43 PM
1

They care about personality more than men do. No they don't. That's sexist and theres no evidence to show it. Money is not personality either. Game is such bullshit cope. Most of it is fake too. PUAs are frauds.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:37 PM
1

It wouldn't explain the differences we see though. If it was just due to random mating, 1 in 40 men would be with a taller women. We observe 1 in 720 however. That's a difference that is not explained by simple dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:36 PM
1

These two are not even comparable. For men, big tits is a bonus. It is not a requirement. For women, being taller is a requirement. Online dating is garbage if you're not tall. Even short girls have tall men requirements. I like big tits but I've NEVER swiped left on a girl because her didn't weren't big enough. Never. Not once. I know several instances where men are flat out rejected for height. Again, it's an asinine comparison. But I'm glad you brought it up because it again proves my point. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:32 PM
1

Most couples I see, the man and woman are similar heights That's because women wear heels, so your brain thinks they are similiar height. Most times men are taller. Women RARELY date a shorter male. Most women, regardless of their own height, have a preference for tall men. Just go on dating sites. You will see that 1) women of all heights prefer 6'+ and 2) You're dating experience will be miserable if you're under average height. Lots of studies show this with respect to online dating. I tried …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:28 PM
1

This is such apologetic bullshit. Actually, women find taller men attractive even when they are not standing next to her so that wouldn't actually make sense. Even in studies where they present animated models, women prefer taller ones more attractive even though they don't look like humans. It's a visual stimulus. It's amazing the back flips women will do to avoid the cognitive dissonance they have from being so shallow. feel safer Ya, it's the 21st century. Besides, if that was true, women wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:19 PM
1

She's not a head turner. But Danny DeVito looks like shit, he wouldn't get ANY pussy if he was not rich. If he was rich and average looking guy, he would have a head turner wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:14 PM
1

No I'm unhappy with the bullshit propoganda that people spread around. I'm probably not going to be attracted to girls with a pancake ass. But why am I the superficial one who just cares about looks and women are the angels who focus on a man's character. That's bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:13 PM
1

Generally the consensus on what is considered attractive is pretty strong. Danny Devito magically is attractive to his wife when he's super rich. He would be celibate for life is he wasn't. I happen to love short guys. You forget to add, BTW , here's my 6'3 boyfriend. Women aren’t a hive mind and find different traits attractive. Lol, please. They always worship the same male celebs who generally look alike. Every hot male celeb is usually a tall white guy. I almost mistake one of these guys for…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:10 PM
1

That's my exact position. I'm just irritated about how society keeps portraying men as shallow and women as angels who care about a man's heart. Nonsense. They care about height, face, muscularity, and wallet.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:08 PM
1

Yes I would agree with this. That's why I feel like women are just as shallow. They don't live in caveman times so they don't NEED a 6'3 guy but they highly emphasize it anyway. It also explains why just because these studies on the activation of brain parts don't necessarily mean that women are angels who care about a man's heart and personality. I agree with alpha fucks/beta bux. People are actually stupid to think that women have attraction towards their less attractive partners. They don't, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:02 PM
1

Both women and men prefer sexually attractive partners, but this preference is consistently found to be more important---a necessity and not a luxury---for men than for women (Buss, 1989; Feingold, 1990; Hatfield & Sprecher,1995; Li et al., 2002; Oda,2001) No shit, if you actually read Davis Buss's book on mate selection, it's because women have to put much more emphasis on wealth/resources for long-term mating. So they have have to make a compromise DUH. For short-term mating, women are actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:57 PM
1

No. I'm saying women are drawn to physical traits in a man just as much men are to women. The kind of porn they watch doesn't mean shit. That's completely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:42 PM
1

Like I believe the research you idiot. It's just that the research you've demonstrated doesn't conflict with what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:39 PM
1

One, this wouldn't explain why women are so hellbent on emphasizing height. You're specifically looking at everything in a sexual manner. But it's more than just sex. Women see men who are taller as more dominant/masculine. Comparing visual porn to erotic porn doesn't disprove what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:36 PM
1

Not a single one of these studies show that women are less visual when it comes to mate selection. It just shows that sexual stimuli is less impactful on women. It DOES NOT mean that women aren't emphasizing physical traits. Take height for instance. Women view it as a trait of power/status/dominance. Even if it doesn't come across as sexually stimulating stimuli, it's still attractive. I don't know why you used 5 very similiar studies that don't even come close to challenging what I said. The s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:32 PM
1

I know but I'm challenging this notion that women are less visual and how they are so sophisticated when it comes to choosing their man. Please... they care about physical traits just as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:21 PM
1

Show me the evidence that women are less visual. Also, don't give me a survey on what women think they like in a man. Show me actual evidence that women are choosing men on the basis of personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter