TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stefan_reevezsky Archive

View 14 posts and 95 comments by stefan_reevezsky on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
553

Social Issuesstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:29 PM
361

Social Issuesstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights15/06/23 12:48 PM
187

Progressstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights24/02/25 09:16 AM
141

Social Issuesstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:00 PM
141

Generalstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:37 PM
137

Social Issuesstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights02/10/24 12:46 PM
111

Social Issuesstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights24/08/25 12:53 PM
107

Generalstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights10/05/24 06:28 AM
87

Generalstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:22 PM
73

Generalstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights25/05/23 05:17 PM
69

Edu./Occu.stefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights18/06/23 07:27 AM
66

Social Issuesstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights05/07/24 07:54 AM
14

Social Issuesstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights09/07/23 07:05 PM
4

Humourstefan_reevezsky/r/MensRights07/01/24 07:49 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If that's the case, it is borderline harassment (borderline because they apparently perceive it as lighthearted). But yeah, talking privately is absolutely a proper way to go
/r/MensRights02/12/25 12:53 PM
17

I am pretty sure that "please stop touching me" would work charms. It is possible that — if your workplace 100% fits your description — such request might make you a bit of an outsider, but well, you already kind of are. Bottom line — yeah, quit joking and be serious. If they make you uncomfortable by physically harassing you out of all possible things, you have all the rights to say that out loud. Jokes and irony will only make them more eager, really
/r/MensRights02/12/25 10:17 AM
1

The former is countered by the post-Gimbutas' consensus, which generally implies that women had ruled the best of civilizations, but the men organized and overtook them. This is a convenient strawman, as it 1) explains the historical state of affairs without conceding to biological differences of the sexes, 2) implies that men (and thus everything male) are evil by nature, as they've started all this, and 3) it gives women an apparent moral right to retaliate. As this hypothesis lacks evidence, …
/r/MensRights25/08/25 05:35 AM
-19

That it's easier to create a DEI hell than a fair sex-blind system.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 03:14 PM
1

I feel like this is the only sensible comment under this post so far, lol. I'm not sure what have happened to this sub. "Redpilling" in this context means "facing the actual issues", so yes, it looks like most of American voter base got redpilled during the last administration. Social departments take time to build, and the current administration was in office only for a couple of months so far. Activism is a concern for the populous anyway, and it also will be fair to leave both sexes on behalf…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 03:12 PM
-30

Well, then it is also easier to build from raw brick than from steel.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 03:03 PM
1

An actually valid comment
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:06 AM
1

Because we are too afraid to think and speak outside the framework in which we are diminished and ridiculed. Any form of the "no offense" line is acknowledging that somebody might be irrationally offended by what you are saying -- it is pandering to irrationalism that got us here in the first place. On the other end - the users of feminist subs are fully aware that they are pro-status quo (and vice versa), so they don't have to 'correct' their rhetoric in any way, as they are not afraid of emoti…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:04 AM
1

I'm convinced nobody would have it, both for lack of research in this area, and, more than likely, lack of evidence. It is quite obvious that the situation with female on male sexual violence was not different from the current, and it was either men not reporting the cases fearing victim-shaming, or women being prosecuted dor other offenses, more serious than sexual assault, that happened along with it. It also would vary depending on time period - in around 1500-1900, it seems, women were prose…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 01:16 PM
1

Not really. Although I prefer "male-bashing" over misandry when I talk about men-on-men hate, I fully mean it being misandry, I just use a more specific term.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 07:24 AM
1

Not really. Although I prefer "male-bashing" over misandry when I talk about men-on-men hate, I fully mean it being misandry, I just use a more specific term.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 07:24 AM
1

Mate, what movies are you even talking about? I thought Hollywood has almost as much censorship as EU-sponsored pro-free-speech outlets.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 07:18 AM
-11

Need more data here. Is your view based on anecdotal evidence or on some study? I sort of agree with you, but I also have a feeling that the "people" who act like teenage girls don't misbehave are either just defensive or are afraid to be called misogynists.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 07:15 AM
3

As well as The Guardian, New York Times, etc. Most media outlets are composed out of self-loathing men and women who were grown up to be happy to help them in self-loathing. Good thing is that the larger part of people is (probably) aware that these articles are being written by assholes.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 07:11 AM
6

We have to teach men to be careful the way we teach women to be careful Yes, we seem to teach women to be careful by staying away from men, not by drinking less. Let's teach men the same thing, then.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:11 AM
7

Ah yes, the good old "my man" reaction from both sexes observing a sexual harassment happening. Almost like we all are conditioned to think that men by nature react positively to all-type assaults on their bodies.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 09:09 AM
1

Well, a lot of men support it because many women are indeed beautiful. This is not the point of my argument - I'm arguing that the same amount of men are beautiful for their own sex-specific reasons, but not a lot of women (nor men) will support this claim, because we all were raised in the culture that undermines and ridicules male body as an object of straight sexual desire.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 08:36 AM
1

Yes. The underlying reasons of "undersexualization" are misandric in nature: sexualization = appreciation, and, say, the culture of expendibility of male body, being a misandric concept in post-industrial society, completely opposes the concept of bodily appreciation.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 08:33 AM
9

I might be overthinking, yet I must refer back to "Spreading Misandry" and it's takes that implicate that thoughts on men's issues ARE being shrugged off as overthinking, and that is one of the reasons they persist. And my point is not exactly about pop cultures, but rather the (western) culture in general. It's not about probabilities of sexualizing, it's about 50% of the population being EXCLUDED from sexualization (aka public sexual appreciation) whatsoever because of... Reasons.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 01:29 PM
3

This post is s little ambiguous, but that is probably because of this "reply". But, from what I gather, it is safe to say that whoever hosts this podcast felt extremely called out on the said bs. The fact itself that the person made an effort to shy away from the used term shows the true thought process. Along with "toxic masculinity" this host is likely comfortable with using other umbrella slurs, such as "cis". And also this host is comfortable with hating men (using an umbrella slur instead o…
/r/MensRights02/10/24 11:24 AM
2

Chivalry was naturally generated as both a way of further installment of male bodies as a disposable subclass, and a way of coping with it. It is related to various "fire baptisms", aka semi-mandatory rituals within various male groups, as all of them are determinably supposed to make male disposability feel emotionally justified for both sexes. The issue is that we are well pass the times when using men as meat-shields was necessary, but this have stayed, as the momentum is too strong.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 04:52 PM
1

I know I'm basically necroing this post right now, but your comment did just catch my attention. What specific studies do actually confirm that women find female bodies more attractive, and their desire is self-focused? Google doesn't really understand me when I try to find anything like this, so what are your sources? If it is true, I think it will make a pretty darn good and narrative-destructive research.
/r/MensRights26/06/24 03:07 PM
5

You are right, AND you are right about disagreeing. My point is that "patriarchy" is inherently brain-dead word that definitionally defies itself. The definition I provided is, as I've mentioned, but a valid reply to "it's just patriarchy" and "men have easier lives" argument. Men might be biologically suited to fulfill such tasks, but it doesn't mean that tremendous mortality accompanied with lack of public appreciation makes them feel even more empowered. Also, I hope, you also agree that jour…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:08 AM
1

Remember about hair length debate around coppers, too. Most (at least, on Reddit) say that male cops aren't supposed to have long hair, even kept above the collar, because a criminal might grab it, but I've never seen this applied to female cops - not even once.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:34 AM
1

I believe that, it's just, again, I can't speak for other cultures because I don't belong to them
/r/MensRights18/03/24 08:04 PM
12

It doesn't seem to be any "demonizing" here. After all, this video was intended to be a joke, and the girl was clearly just confused by a very sudden attitude change. He should've done it more subtly, if wanted a clearer outcome. That said, her instant change of behavior just perfectly demonstrated the fact that women, despite everyone saying otherwise, actually do perceive males as sexual objects. As was shown in their interactions before, she acted completely differently when didn't sense any …
/r/MensRights18/03/24 10:34 AM
29

I wouldn't say you entirely right here - being single, I've personally struggled more not because of lack of sex (masturbation, lol), but because I just felt that I need to embrace and hold a girl, while she does the same to me. This is essentially the need to be loved, and while some men might not have it pronounced, others very much do. This is where the whole concept of monogamy comes from.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:56 AM
3

Shaking off the urine has nothing to do with it, I just used it as example of the sexual education, both academic and domestic, which is by default designed to teach girls about their bodies more than boys about theirs. Because, you know, vagina. Your take on sexual pleasure topic is actually good, too. It seems like one of the weird proofs that there is a secret cult that people disprove by inertia.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:07 AM
1

What was even it this comment, jeez
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:00 AM
2

I'd say that Latin world counts as Western, too - I just can't speak for it's culture and sentiments
/r/MensRights18/03/24 08:59 AM
0

It's pretty weird, but understandable, because boys would rather wear a skirt than a classic male school lower body uniform of shoes, above-the-knee shorts and knee-length socks. It actually illustrates that for many it seems more logical to rebel against it by projecting feminine shapes on masculine basis, instead of allowing to diversify the masculine basis itself.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 08:57 AM
2

True, but you probably can also find communities of friends who enjoy shoving cactuses upon arses of their pet animals. The Internet itself is a rabbithole of insecure and hateful jerks, which includes misogynists and misandrists. TikTok is still the worst, though, and the world would objectively be a better place without it.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 02:38 PM
23

If this isn't all trolling, these people are severely insecure and terrified.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:19 AM
1

This sounds even funnier since the reason for this accusation was the fact that George have ghosted her when he found out that she had lied about her age.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 10:41 AM
5

Among other things, it is one of ways of diminishing male sexuality. Dances that have sexual suggestiveness and performed by straight men tend to be ridiculed - in American culture, at least. We have a cult of female body, preached by BOTH men AND women, but for some reason have no cult of male's.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 10:36 AM
3

You try so hard If 17 words is tryharding for you, I wonder how would you call this rant of yours You try so hard to make me look crazy, self loathing, and ashamed of my penis (thus all of the above) just so you don't have to take my statement seriously Again - it's not me who's projecting here... But whatever suits your needs
/r/MensRights31/01/24 07:27 PM
1

If you are convinced that your genitalia is "ugly", it's not me who has issues here, mate
/r/MensRights31/01/24 04:09 PM
3

I wouldn't say that vaginas are as repulsing as these people claim dicks to be. From my point of view, the reason for the whole thing is something different, and, likely, culture plays a fundamental role in it. It doesn't mean that I like receiving random vagina pics, though.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:38 AM
5

I would go further and say that it is not just a turnoff, but a red flag. But sexually speaking - yes, it is a MAJOR turn off -- likely one of the strongest ones out there.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 10:12 AM
2

There are some supposed men having this opinion, too. It really seems similar to, for instance, some guys justifying flaws of female characters in videogames by saying that they are hot so it all doesn't count.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 10:10 AM
7

As with many things, as a man you don't have to be gay to see something clearly, either. It is actually a "footnote" I've seen couple of times in these threads - is that gay man appreciate penises more than straight women. And as it sounds paradoxically wrong, it makes be think that the whole controversy (if you can call a one-sided argument such) is not about aesthetics at all, but rather about some mental issues people choose to be silent or ignorant about.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 10:07 AM
3

From what I've seen, they usually mean that penises are ugly in overall, not certain types. That's why it sounds horrible. And "not attractive, but efficient" adds to that, too. For me personally it doesn't resolve the insecurity. But yes, it's not to be passed unchallenged.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 09:59 AM
8

I have actually thought about it, and first reply that came into my mind was "well, some dildos have just the shape, but not details". However, a LOT of dildos do look like actual penises and they are sold big time, so there must be an explanation for that too. My point is that the popularity of "detailed" dildos creates a certain paradox with "dick is an ugly thing paradigm", which makes it look like some weird conspiracy even more
/r/MensRights31/01/24 09:57 AM
2

If it is the case (even though I never heard this joke, but it's probably just my experience), the opposite must be a case, too. There is no reason for it not to be, but it somehow isn't in many cases, and this is strange asf.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 09:51 AM
6

You might "think" so, yet is isn't what modern culture does. Again - flowers, grapefruits with female finger stick in it, and pink pants. And when people say that dicks are ugly (at least to my knowledge), they don't specify whether they are flaccid or erect, so I assume it doesn't matter to them.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 09:48 AM
7

I wonder where beside comedy and pornography.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 09:46 AM
2

I think one of the deep issues here is how much males are objectified in porn. Man's face often is not even on the screen, is it? It's just a body and a penis. Who cares? Men are generic - that's why they're getting paid less. Oh, wait a second - they totally enjoy it, how could I forget. What can be better for a dude than get 500$ for having sex with hot chick, right??? Of course he likes it, because all men like it. And now - imagine a straight male OnlyFans model. It would be just like female…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:06 PM
2

True. I myself dealt with girls like that (no wonder we kept breaking up lol), but I don't think it's necessarily that they can't offer anything but they bodies - is more like they don't think that men need or want anything more than their bodies. It kind of works both ways, too - especially if we talk about dating in school or college, when girls don't see guys as source of income yet, but nevertheless date them. By which I mean that guys who do have girlfriends not always happy neither, becaus…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:03 AM
3

Well, yeah, this is exactly where I'm getting. It's if you complain about men's issued they're just going to say that you complain about not having enough of it. And yes, you probably haven't meet a single man like that because this "men are always up for sex" isn't true IRL - but this is too much for some to comprehend.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 06:34 AM
1

There's nothing wrong with that per se - it's just the great portion of those around isn't going to believe you if you'll say that sex is not the only relationship-connected thing on your mind.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 06:30 AM
11

Yes, and which is even worse, is that nobody is seemingly going to believe you if you'll say that it isn't the case for you -- because why would you care for men's rights, then
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:46 PM
2

Also, if possible - you can try to throw "Don't project your insecurities on me" phrase -- it might be quite useful.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:18 AM
1

Ok. But tall women exist too. Want to deny that, eh?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:58 PM
3

Mate, tall women exist, and they commit crimes, too - embrace it
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:23 PM
1

actually this is one of the first things that have to change in the next Glorious revolution
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:22 PM
2

Considering that they were described by 15 years old, he might've give them more height than they actually were (your eye level is not your height); point taken, though But still, there's a lot of tall women around in Europe -- about that we have to remember, too
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:20 PM
2

the term actually should be just plain "raped by two paedophiles", but there's a long way to go to use it without confusing people
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:18 PM
1

Just to clarify - by red-pillers I mean Andrew Tate-like individuals. I don't consider them MRA, because they haven't developed any specific rhetoric or solutions, and often prefer a role of "wise mentor" for young men rather than educating them about real issues they have as a gender. That might be considered "men's rights" by some, but it's certainly not activism.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:21 PM
11

It's not rhetorical question, it is very important. There is many reasons. My personal 'favourite' is that most people (including most men ffs) are convinced that male individuals are inherently not self-sufficient when it comes to relationships and especially sexuality, and therefore having women is sign of "A MAN", while not having women by intention is breaking this doctrine = self-sufficient = not "A MAN". Same goes for pretty much all Men's rights because there is a perception that this mov…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:18 PM
17

I literally just red a commentary under some random Florence Welch related post - written by young woman, it got into how badly she wants to shove spiked club into arse of male neighbour of some TikTok girl who pretends that she lives in the wilderness, because he ruins her immersion by living in the house nearby. I guess, answering your question can be avoided by using "not all feminists" type of reply, but if "not all man" doesn't hold up for them, why "not all feminists" would hold up for us.…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:10 PM
1

And now in one
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:03 PM
1

Mate, I beg you, say it in three words
/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:49 AM
151

Probably no conspiracies here, just good old societal rot. If you'll dare to ask why there is barely any gym that advertises itself as male-only, you will probably receive an answer such as "most gyms are male-only", which doesn't hold up. If you'll dare to ask why there is barely any domestic abuse shelter that advertises itself as male-only, you will probably receive answers such as "most victims are women" or "there are a couple of 'em here and there", and they don't hold up, too. Same goes f…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 11:24 AM
1

Ah, thanks. From now, when I'll go out wearing one of my kilts, I will be deemed gender-friendly policy exploiter, not just a chap wearing fancy skirt. Also, I like how the word sexist is put in brackets in there, like it isn't a big deal at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 11:05 AM
0

Just as I said.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 06:32 AM
3

Why do so many men think that being horny losers is somehow funny or endearing? Because most men are either taught to treat this issue in different way or too afraid of taking it seriously and rather shrug it off by joke (notice how it is always being turned into a joke). How can we expect women to take sexual assault against men seriously when we ourselves don’t treat it seriously? We kind of don't?.. I mean, there are women who are naturally concerned with these problems, but those who aren't …
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:38 PM
1

As long as you don't visit many certain subs and posts, that is
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:25 PM
2

I personally define it as domestic violence and sexual assault. Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:24 PM
2

This post will probably get little attention, because, I think, a lot of people here, too, have a perception that rich = evil (correct me if I'm wrong, and I want to be). There is motivation to say that other than envy - but it's so damn hurtful that even apologists don't like to bring it up. It's just hate towards rich is deeply intertwined into the modern Western culture, while poor and, therefore, heroic, are glorified - and YES, this is how it goes. American and French revolutions are mothba…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:21 PM
1

By general public - you mean web in general? Whatever is the case, it is, probably, because they feel that their beliefs are threatened - I don't think there's much more to add. I'm not sure about TwoChromosomes, though. It really seems like one of the groups that will consider themselves threatened with MRA. Not a good place for descent information and considerations - only for debates, where pro-MRA always "lose" because of number of downvotes.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 02:06 PM
3

As usual, nothing is quiet in California. It's strange that it happened there, though. With the current situation in the place, it seems like a case that was made up intentionally just to have a single evidence that justice actually exists.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:33 AM
8

It indeed works both ways, but when man is independent (aka self-sufficient) he's usually called an incel. Peoples in the West don't want to acknowledge existence of independent men. They're either seen as red-pilled, sexist and/or stupidly arrogant, and they're expected to be "redeemed" by settling down and giving up on their terrible, terrible egocentric world views. Also, they're usually mixed up with another type of men - those who has so little respect to themselves, that they don't respect…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 06:38 AM
4

Sarcasmibia
/r/MensRights17/06/23 06:31 PM
86

- men can earn more without a degree - didn't you know that working on construction site basically gives you 100,000+ £ a month?
/r/MensRights17/06/23 12:38 PM
3

Profound.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 04:11 PM
4

Alright, but let's not get paranoid
/r/MensRights15/06/23 04:08 PM
40

It's not that no one gives a fuck - is that less of them given in case if victim is male. Men need to be MUCH louder than women when reporting stalking in order for it to be taken by peoples equally important - but most men are afraid to do that, because they know they will get shamed.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:07 PM
1

What is as disturbing is the fact that this subject is hard to imagine in popular media outside of comedic context
/r/MensRights15/06/23 12:20 PM
25

This argument is made by either those who still somehow sees feminism trough blurry glasses or those who are afraid to sound too radical. No, MRA should not work with feminism - at least, not while feminists (and, well, lots of other folks) consider Men's rights activists bigots.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 02:47 PM
1

What you're encountering is basically the main feminist strawman, that is so old that it seems like universal truth. Since "lived experience" of people (excluding men, at least straight and white ones) became more important than empirical experience of majority, this strawman has started to prevail even more - and there is no wonder in that. Feminist rhetoric in the West is artificial, which is different in case with not-red-pilled MRA community, that (mostly) has basis in actual researches and …
/r/MensRights09/06/23 02:41 PM
21

When I was a little kid, I had a cartoonish book about getting out of tough personal situations as a child. One of the chapters was about being lost in public space - and the book said that you must reach nearest person around you and ask them to help to find your parents. And in the text, it was specifically stressed that this person better be a woman. There is a perception that men treat children worse than women do, or they are just straight dangerous to them - which is understandable, as mos…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 02:31 PM
5

The fact that they use "equity" as a term already says enough. "However, men as a group have more wealth, influence, and prestige, so this difference would not be a social injustice and, therefore, not a health disparity or equity issue." Straight-on lie. Successful people as a group have these things - if it is even right to divide people into groups in the first place. Not all men are successful, not everyone who is successful are men. There's no dots to connect between sex and success neither…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 02:24 PM
18

Btw, what we see here is actually a sexual objectivation of men (penis is more important than the person). By... A lesbian. Ironic, isn't it? Damn, I have to write couple of paragraphs about this.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:42 PM
11

I'M NOT A MAN AND I DATE NO MAN @ MEN ARE THE PROBLEM Sounds like someone is really think themselves fancy. Also, you used "strawman" correctly. It seems that she doesn't know what it means, and that's why she accused yourself in it. And "punch down" thing is a strawman.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:38 PM
8

Fanfiction is a pile of garbage and everyone is aware of this fact. Nonetheless, it does a good job in shaping perceptions of it's audience, which is mostly under 30 and "kinky". The turning fictional male friendships into romantic/sexual doesn't really differ from similar situations in the real life, but it is somewhat worse because characters and sometimes the author themselves are not able to say "no" (in case if author is dead/centred on fanservice, that is). It must be also acknowledged tha…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 01:52 PM
1

Because nowadays "incel" basically means a man who wants to be aware about his sexual life - which is obviously wrong, because men always want sex and their bodies don't really matter. Also, due to the huge community, Reddit has an ability of turning into 4chan on minimal graphic settings - some folks may downvote anything that has at least 1 downvote without actually reading it, ignore details of threads and use terms they don't know meaning of. Also also, caring about number of sexual partners…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:54 AM
1

The other day I accidentally stumbled upon a Pinterest board called "Misandry". The first moment I allowed myself to genuinely hope that whoever made it is, in fact, against misandry. Obviously, it wasn't the case - pins gathered in there are basically screenshots form (mostly) old movies, where through subtitles men are shown stupid/arrogant/selfish/self-centered in comparison to women characters next to them. If term "Misandry" can be used in non-critical context (while the term itself is crit…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 09:07 AM
5

Well, while we have nothing, we must start with baby steps.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 08:59 AM
2

Dear school, please COMMENT on the fact that she lied, I dare you.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 08:58 AM
1

Strange that no one points on that - but it is also a question of language. "Bring Back Our Girls" sounds more dramatic and honourable than "Bring Back Our Boys". Boys are ok, they can manage. ThEy WeRe AbDuCtEd By OtHeR mEn AfTeR aLL The "Girls" rhetoric creates the same effect as "My/our babies" rhetoric - it feels like the person who says it is ready to burst into tears - therefore, is more genuine and kind. The same way, mention of "Boys" generally seems funny, ironic or violent. Perhaps, on…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 08:55 AM
2

Even if it wasn't gendered in first couple of seconds of existence, it quickly became like this. When Terry Crews spoke out, he used the term "toxic masculinity", therefore confirming that men are only possible perpetrators. So yes, it is gendered.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 10:58 AM
1

Yes. But also we must consider that a man who doesn't have this mindset (wants to stay single and independent, for example) will face same social issues that the one that does, due to the current set of values. If someone's thinking is this kind of patriarchal, it certainly won't make said someone's life any better, and lot of men, in fact, will not side with it.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:49 PM
7

Yes, as long as they are victimized by men, and not the other way around.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:23 PM
11

Thanks for the definition. Thing is - western hemisphere doesn't live in patriarchal society anymore, and it will be just plain dumb to deny it when evidence is shown. This mindset is a problem, because it doesn't correlate with ruling ideology, but makes it only worse. For men.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:20 PM
4

Well, if you can point out their similarities, it shouldn't be too hard for you to point out their differences, correct?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter