TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stellarwatermelons Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by stellarwatermelons on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

The argument is not whether or not it’s human. Even remotely. We all know it’s human — the point is that it’s parasitic. By your own admission, it can’t grow or even exist without sucking nutrients from its host. That’s literally, again, by definition, a parasite. That’s literally a person with a uterus donating their body for to a parasite. Forced birth is equivalent to me tying you down and taking your kidney against your will, just because you’re a dumbfuck who could stand to live without it …
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 05:46 AM
3

Your entire statement is grossly lacking in actual fact. It’s made entirely of opinion...and it’s kind of hilarious that you’d cite “science” as a source for proving the conception is the start of life when in reality science is what dictates it’s a fetus, dictates its literal parasite status, and dictates whether or not it’s a baby. Oops, I mean, you caught me. People use “baby” to colloquially refer to their wanted fetuses. Clearly every scientifically classified fetus must now be referred to …
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 05:22 AM
3

...No. That is literally the recognized English definition of “baby.” ba·by /ˈbābē/ noun a very young child, especially one newly or recently born. "his wife's just had a baby" synonyms: infant, newborn, child, tot, little one; More Every single official definition of “baby” defines a human that is born. Not in any way a fetus. Honestly though, what a fucking dumb thing to argue about if your honest intentions are to save “”babies”” from being “”killed.”” Is it that hard to tell people to not ki…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 05:13 AM
2

The definition of “baby” is a young child, one newly or recently born. Literally, by definition, it is not synonymous with “fetus.”
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 05:06 AM
3

Not what I said. I said statistics are vague and that elective abortions are written with an obvious bias as something that happens to include “deformities” such as cleft palates but not the obvious and majority ones that are not ‘correctable’ or even survivable. I’ve explained my point very clearly, don’t make wild assertions or attempt to put words into my mouth — it doesn’t work, sorry. A baby born for 10 minutes is a baby. Not a fetus. It exists without a host, outside of a womb. It would ob…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 05:02 AM
4

I appreciate the source & information, but truly, this isn’t groundbreaking or even supportive of your statement. The woman interviewed was at 26 weeks...a fetus doesn’t even develop the neural pathways to begin feeling pain or responding to stimuli until 27 weeks. You’re initial comment is exactly what I pegged it as — alarmist and dramatic anti-abortionist propaganda. Every single statistic in this article is vague. “Fetal deformities, which includes correctable conditions such as a cleft pala…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 04:51 AM
1

Source please
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 04:24 AM
1

That would be a valid statement if any abortion clinic would actually remove a late-term fetus without severe medical issues to justify and sustain that decision. Honestly, anti-abortionists like you are so dramatic & such blatant misogynists, it’s not even subtle anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/19 04:18 AM
1

Haha. Ok man.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/18 03:53 AM
2

Yeah, no. The moment you basically said you know what I’m thinking, this discussion is over. You’re a jackass grasping at straws to defend a likely predator and I don’t really care how mad you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/18 03:48 AM
2

All of the random shit you just said has nothing to do with what I said. You’re just lumping together everyone’s statements. It doesn’t matter whether or not he was given an STD, if he knocked her up, or if he wanted it in the moment. I never gave any “what if he was 10!!!” argument. A teacher/student relationship is wholly inappropriate on any educator’s part, and as I said, will always have a power dynamic. Whether you believe it or not. I don’t blame the kid for anything. If he isn’t affected…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/18 03:18 AM
4

When I was 15 I was preyed on by a 24yo male. He groomed me and mentally abused me because I was fucking 15, not yet developed, and I was way too young to understand what a healthy relationship was. It was absolutely abusive and every single person who knew about it was appalled. Most likely because I’m a woman and he was a man. I can’t believe these sick fucks scoffing at the statement that the boy will be scarred. He will be, no matter how many ‘high-fives’ he gets. This is incredibly taboo an…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/18 07:30 PM
7

Holy fuck, how are people disagreeing with you in this thread?! Any teacher/student sexual relationship, especially with a minor aged as low as 15, has a guaranteed power dynamic that the teacher takes advantage of. This was without a doubt premeditated and required grooming. This teacher is a fucking predator, plain and simple. Any adult who preys on a 15 year old is.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/18 07:20 PM
4

This law and the way it's been carried out so far has done an amazing job of both demonizing men and infantilizing women
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/17 03:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter