TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stimulustrader Archive

View 2 posts and 27 comments by stimulustrader on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Feminismstimulustrader/r/MensRights21/10/21 02:03 AM
0

Marriage/Childrenstimulustrader/r/MensRights16/12/21 06:26 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hmm, you are right! It seems as if we "both" are going back and forth, and I don't like this either. So let me ask you this question, and let me see what answer that you will or will not give. This will eliminate everything that we have said that appears to be a broken record. It is the original question. When a man and woman is married, are they husband and wife, or are they simply partners?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:23 PM
-2

A) ME: "No one is saying that men need better rights then other men. No one is saying that some men need their rights elevated because some men disrespect their rights. This is the talk of someone who is trying to turn men against men, or man against himself." B) YOU: Cite where I said that. Either you're not reading or something's with your reading comprehension. It looks like you're not getting this at all. C) ME: "**If men were treated expendably through out history, who was treating him that…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:56 PM
-1

Maybe you are really in the wrong forum. There is no one in this forum that is saying that men need rights against men. No one is saying that men need better rights then other men. No one is saying that some men need their rights elevated because some men disrespect their rights. This is the talk of someone who is trying to turn men against men, or man against himself. However, the struggle is a man vs woman struggle. Furthermore, men are trying to regain the strength that they had before their …
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:21 PM
0

Well, I guess saying men have been treated expendably is tricky way of trying to say that men some how need to be pulled up to the level of rights of women. Very tricky spend on this men's rights forum LOL. However, I will test this illusion that you just tried to create. If men were treated expendably through out history, who was treating him that way?! Are you saying that man was treating himself that way? I say this because when it comes to men and women, men were the ones in charge, and this…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 12:04 PM
0

What do you mean by "they never were"?!
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:09 AM
-1

The question was what happened to the rights of men? Did the rights of men somehow disappear? These were the questions. What does "they never were" mean?!
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:22 PM
1

Hmm, what happened to the rights of men? Do you care to explain? Did the rights of men somehow disappear?
/r/MensRights19/12/21 05:35 PM
1

Somethings are what they are, and can never be changed. Although their are some "new age" people who want to magically make something up. When a women overstep her position, it always causes problems with men. This is why this forum exits. Evidently, whoever created this forum has a problem with what women have become.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 11:11 PM
1

This is a mens rights forum.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 06:32 PM
1

I think that you were trying to steer this conversation in a different way. However, the truth is the truth.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:58 AM
1

Have not you heard of a small business that has one employee?!
/r/MensRights18/12/21 01:02 AM
1

Hmm, how is it not comparable. Let me hear your opinion.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 06:28 PM
0

I don't want you to subtlety change what I said. I never said man was more important! Man's mental and biological makeup which was designed by nature makes him first in the order of importance. Again, I said (first in the order of importance). The woman is important also, just as the employee is important in a business. Without the employee the employer will have no business. However, the employer is first in the order of importance.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:27 PM
0

You are neither what?
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:54 AM
0

Man's proper position is leader.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:51 AM
0

Because nature supports this fact.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:49 AM
2

Very true.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:56 PM
1

In the order of importance, man is first than the woman is next. Now don't get this wrong. I did not say that the woman is not important. I said in the "order" of importance, man is first.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:53 PM
1

Normalizing homosexual is a byproduct on the partner term. If you weaken the male then you make way for more acceptance of other things.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:49 PM
3

No, it is true today also. However, men have been castrated into thinking otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:47 PM
7

You are right, two people who are together yet independent of each other. This is the idea that America wants to preach. However, this is not how a marriage is.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 09:25 AM
1

Probably best not to flirt at all with an American woman makes no difference how you look. It can be considered sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:09 AM
1

I asked where was the link to this?
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:07 AM
-1

Where is the link to this?
/r/MensRights24/10/21 02:58 PM
3

Don't worry, the feminists have their hands full with transgender women taken over their sports. It they won't real equality, then they should not have any problem with it.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 02:42 PM
6

You are right, I did an edit.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 06:55 AM
1

Yes, it is a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 07:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter