stlunatik Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Men are angry not because they can’t get laid easily, but because they can’t use their power while women can. Men used their strength to protect their OWN women. Men used brute force (killing men/taking ownership of women) to gain land/resources (including women) to expand civilizations and increase their population. Are you arguing that men haven’t used their strength and the threat of said strength to dictate women’s sexuality in the past? Whether that is “protection” or not is subjective as of the past few hundred years imo. Are you a man telling me to “bulk up bro” to get women or something like I d…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/20 09:41 PM
2	Men are angry not because they can’t get laid easily, but because they can’t use their power while women can. You’re talking to a guy who’s a former gold glove champion boxer, I think I know what strength does for dating prospects which is what I mentioned. My understanding of OP is referring to men overpowering women and taking what they want by force as they have for the past two millennia, not working on your six pack and biceps so more women make it easier for YOU to initiate contact with them. Like I said, I think it’s a good thing that we’re not taking what we want by force, it’s just an observati…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/20 09:03 PM
1	Men are angry not because they can’t get laid easily, but because they can’t use their power while women can. That wasn't his claim though. He never claimed "men don't have any power", he's claiming the ultimate power that is characteristic of our gender (strength/power) is largely condemned while the power characteristic of the opposite gender (sexuality/seduction) is not only accepted, but being encouraged. The fact that men can improve themselves can certainly improve sexual prospects, but it's still not relevant to the OP imo. I'm not sure what could possibly be done about this cause I'd rather not …	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/20 06:30 PM
1	CMV: The fact that it's harder for men to get sex makes high n-count guys more pathetic not more admirable. Literally every single one of of your replies has been completely off topic lmfao. So you posed a change my view question, hoping that only one very niche subset of the male population would respond? Not how that works. Red Pill guys aren't the only ones who know about slut vs stud bullshit, other guys irl just don't label it. I disagree with the argument that "High n count man inherently good, high n count woman inherently bad". But how can you go from disagreeing that he's objectively good (st…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 08:18 PM
3	CMV: The fact that it's harder for men to get sex makes high n-count guys more pathetic not more admirable. This is driving me insane. What stud vs slut argument did I bring up? Do you think I'm a red-pill, mgtow dude or something? I love sluts. I love their degeneracy. I don't know nor do I care about a "slut vs stud argument" and if you see that anywhere in my posts than let me know. What I'm saying is that your claim of highly attractive, high n count men being pathetic for trying so hard to get sex is invalid when its the women in sooo many circumstances who are the ones clamoring for sex with the…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 07:58 PM
3	CMV: The fact that it's harder for men to get sex makes high n-count guys more pathetic not more admirable. You didn't at all because trivial is 100% subjective in your argument, that's what I meant by define your argument. Why are you saying I'll dump like it's a fact when I'm childfree and don't like long term monogamy? You're confusing casual sex partners with cum-dumpster one night stands, which I don't do. We've been friends who have hung out consistently for two years which is longer than many people keep platonic friendships nowadays. The rest of my post was saying that if my 5'6 ass can rack u…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 07:39 PM
2	CMV: The fact that it's harder for men to get sex makes high n-count guys more pathetic not more admirable. You didn't answer a single question I posed in my counter argument. So again, why are your platonic friends more meaningful than the two women that I met in college as platonic friends, confessed mutual sexual attraction to, and proceeded to hangout with for the next two years while having sex with them? Of course you don't plan on dumping friends, but people still do it. Frequently. Same as I don't plan on dumping my fuck buddies at this stage of my life, but life moves on and shit happens, j…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 07:18 PM
3	CMV: The fact that it's harder for men to get sex makes high n-count guys more pathetic not more admirable. I do apologize for misidentyfing you, this sounded very incel-ish and sometimes they need tough love. You're argument is still, however, too vague to disprove imo. What do you mean by "impressed"? Impressed as in "Wow that's a behavioral pattern that is superior and objectively good" or "Wow, that is so unbelievably unlikely that I'm impressed that you're an anomaly"? My stance is the latter, I said nothing about "admiring" them. Also, "friends aren't trivial"..says who? You? That means nothing …	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 06:44 PM
9	CMV: The fact that it's harder for men to get sex makes high n-count guys more pathetic not more admirable. This really is the biggest load of horseshit I've ever seen on this sub. You said in your title that it's harder for men to get laid than women then go on to essentially say "If you wouldn't respect a high N count woman, then why respect a high N count man?"...maybe because it's exponentially harder? "If you wouldn't respect a 6'8 black guy making it to the NBA, then why respect the 5'11 Asian Harvard grad who starts for the Knicks?" "If you wouldn't respect someone who was handed a million doll…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/04/20 06:05 PM
1	If a guy can’t commit/be faithful to a girl, it doesn’t mean he’s out of her league; it means he’s a man with options that he wants to explore. Complete nonsense and I would bet money that you don't know any real "chads" on an intimate level. My best friends' current girlfriend (20f) is the ex gf of a guy who made his first NBA All-Star team this year. My friend cheated on her last month with a 5/10 at the bar because it was getting late, he was drunk, and she approached our group in a sexually aggressive manner. If you honestly think that "Chads" (can't stand the way this sub pathetically uses a term that no "chad" in real life would e…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/04/20 06:59 PM