TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stochasticprocess123 Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by stochasticprocess123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
39

False. It is just another "he had no success when he was younger, therefore he must be a bad person".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 03:28 PM
8

I would not call that friend zone. Friend zone is when you are friends with her, then she starts liking you but you fail to read her mind so you don't make a move, and since you were "too slow" to read her mind she will reject you later if you make a move because now you are seen as just a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:06 PM
1

What matters the most to me is less taxes and less spending. Generally the ones that support those things and have a chance of winning are conservative candidates. If there was a candidate with good chances of winning that supports both individual rights and free markets, then that would be my first choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:42 AM
1

Since inexperienced women don't like inexperienced men, then it doesn't matter if it is hypocritical or not. They generally want a man that is experienced, they think that the dude that is a virgin is a walking redflag.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 11:11 PM
5

You could argue that anything is simply existing. "Oh, you got a nice gift for that friend's birthday this week? That is simply existing." "What? Today you helped your aunt to fix that broken thing? That is also simply existing."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 08:51 PM
10

Yes, that is my point. Just because they are not complaining, it doesn't mean that they don't exist, or that they are not nice guys (morally good, kind, productive, no dating success).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 06:32 PM
7

Ok, fair enough. But the general internet consensus is that "nice guys are not nice", which is a biased opinion since the nice ones usually would not self proclaim to be nice and complain online.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 06:17 PM
18

Availability bias. There are the self proclaimed "nice guys" that waste their time complaining about dating online, and the other "nice guys" that are just doing their thing like work, hobbies etc instead of dating or complaining. You only get to hear about the first group.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 04:55 PM
55

They mean that they have the traits that a good person/employee/citizen/adult/friend should have, but they lack the other traits that lead to romantic or sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:53 PM
5

Someone that has been neeting is not a late bloomer, it is someone that simply never bloomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:59 PM
1

A late bloomer, by definition, has won. He finished his studies and is making money with a nice job. It should not matter that much if he is celibate, he can still be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:15 PM
–

I would say that my interests changed. It is more satisfying to try to be a top tier athlete or to grind more at work. I don't know if women would say that my value is high, even if I think it is. I have no interest in becoming a fboy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 03:48 PM
–

It is an implicit assumption I guess. Be a nice guy, get educated, get a good job, get fit, and you will magically get a girlfriend when you are in your late 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 01:07 PM
1

I liked the feedback, "the truth" in my case was learning that I should lie about being inexperienced and fake it till I make it if I want to improve my odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 01:21 AM
1

I bet that most sense "introvert guy = sexist".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 09:37 PM
–

Another "self improvement guarantees a gf post". No, it does not. Is it still worth it? Yes, at least you will be alone with a nice body and a lot of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:32 PM
5

Maybe it is just a bias from looking at what we lack. For instance, I have looks and a good career, what I lack is being more sociable, so if/when I "fix" what I lack, I will believe that women are attracted to charisma and confidence, and I will ignore that I already had the looks, education, money and career. So they are homogeneous (confident, 6 figures, 6 feet, 6 inches), but we focus on the last thing that we had to improve on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 02:39 PM
–

That is not the same thing, not even close. My point is just that women's dating standards are very high and there is no point in complaining, it won't change a thing. Men are required to have above average physical attributes, career and social skills. You are not allowed to read the lines wrong and either think that she is being flirty when she is being friendly (creepy), or that she is being friendly when she is being flirty (oblivious, passive). That is the way the world is, you can still go…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 01:28 PM
–

That is the way the world is, now stop bitching and moaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:58 PM
33

But does it really get better? Women keep saying how there must be something wrong with an inexperienced guy and that they won't take any chances, or that they don't want to have to "teach" an inexperienced guy. Maybe as the guys get older, we will see those same statistics moving to older age groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 11:43 AM
–

Yes, I am above average on education, status, net worth and income, on looks I am average, but for dating purposes I am below average because I stay at home watching anime and playing games, I don't even bother going out (work from home).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter