TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

storming_bridgeboy Archive

View 0 posts and 69 comments by storming_bridgeboy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

first off, just because gender and sex USED to be the same thing doesn’t mean they are anymore. That’s exactly the kind of ideological revisionism I’m talking about. You can link whatever post-modernist sources you want on this topic, they all participate in this revisionism. It’s like using a word in the definition for that same word, it’s circular and useless. Believing you are something you are not is mental illness. That’s the end of it, really. What is objectively wrong with wishing to be a…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 09:10 PM
0

You are talking about a definition of gender that has been made up and co-opted by post-modernists to advocate for their fake gender science. It’s not real. You don’t get to change the definitions of existing words to suit your ideological needs. Gender = sex. If you “feel” that you are a different sex, that is mental illness and we should be helping those people not hurting them by enabling their delusion.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:53 PM
1

Men are men and women are women. Your ad-hominem doesn’t change biological science, and it says more about your character than mine.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:50 PM
-1

This is not a teaching moment. Gender and sex mean the same thing. You cannot change the meaning of words to suit your post-modernist beliefs. You are hurting people by enabling their delusion. They are not women.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 12:12 PM
-2

No, there isn’t. That is linguist and scientific revisionism. A trans woman is not and can never be a woman. You are only hurting them further by enabling their delusion instead of allowing them to get real help.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 12:12 PM
12

If scooping ice cream had better benefits, yes. That’s kind of what this video is presenting. I’m glad you’re happily married. Envious, even. And there are certainly men today in the same position as you. This video is viewing marriage on the macro-scale though, not through anecdotes.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 01:27 PM
0

A trans woman is a woman No, they aren’t. they still have a dick Because they’re men.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:07 PM
-11

non trans women So… women.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:31 AM
2

Yes because he found updated statistics, and even linked them to you. Are you perhaps seasoning everything you eat with lead paint flakes?
/r/MensRights28/08/21 09:04 PM
4

Because the statistics imply that a ruling for no alimony is made most often when a women has higher income.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 09:02 PM
-1

You can’t but you can certainly not be so accepting of it / encouraging of it as I believe we have been.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:45 PM
-9

Yes. It does. She consented to having the baby when she chose to have a fling. That is called personal responsibility. You cannot end a human life out of convenience, and generally those that argue this participate in dehumanization of the baby in order to justify it - making themselves no different than any other genocide in history. Please look at adoption statistics. I’m not saying that this poor family needs to care for this baby. In western countries infant babies get adopted very quickly. …
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:34 PM
1

If I consented to being a direct cause of your existence beforehand, yes.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:38 PM
0

This argument is flawed and ignores the rights of the baby’s body. It is not about the mother’s rights.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:38 AM
-10

The vast vast majority of abortions are abortions of convenience. Abortions for medical reasons are the exception not the rule.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:36 AM
-29

So they are arbitrarily deciding when it is OK to end a human life. That’s better. /s
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:52 AM
-7

Reading the comments here, it always amazes me that people that claim to fight for equal rights just can’t abide the idea that an unborn baby deserves that same defense. Even more so, because they can’t fight for themselves.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:42 AM
9

Agreed on the part of reporting, but you can’t really stop the accuser from going public. And once the accuser has gone public, is the news just not supposed to report it? Unfortunately I don’t think that’s realistic. They definitely need to be more neutral in their reporting, though. Our society needs to go back to a place where it believes in innocence until proven guilty. Easier said than done, I guess
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:51 PM
4

“We can’t send women to jail! That would affect their mental health!!” Meanwhile they don’t seem to care about the mental health of MEN they send to jail do they? They don’t even care about the mental health of the woman that she hit. So they’re not even consistent in their idiocy.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 12:45 PM
2

That makes sense!
/r/MensRights03/08/21 05:03 PM
172

Honestly the spousal support seems low given the way that it generally goes in the other direction.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:12 PM
18

“Spousal support” makes absolutely no sense. Get a damn job you’re an empowered woman
/r/MensRights22/07/21 06:14 PM
21

Evidently not, because you have spent the entire thread excusing her actions and have only mentioned her father in the context of how it affected her mentally, with no regard for how his life was affected.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:17 PM
33

You have an awful lot of sympathy for her and absolutely no sympathy for the father, which is why this subreddit exists.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 10:46 PM
1

Have they made a new bible? There is far less religiously motivated violence from Christianity than there is from Islam currently, world wide. Tibetan Buddhism was probably the worst. Maybe, but I said of the big ones. Have you ever lived in any of the countries where there is a lot of Islam? I would never do that. Ever. I don’t think you need to live somewhere to form an opinion either, so it’s a silly irrelevant point.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 07:44 PM
-3

Women probably have less opportunity to report DV.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 07:32 PM
1

The difference is Christianity has had a reformation. I detest religion altogether, but if you want to compare religions Islam is certainly the most violent of the big ones currently. There is no comparison. It’s just making logical observations based on reality. Y’all are so quick to defend terrible ideologies because “ohh nooo you’re being [racist/bigoted/prejudiced].” Sometimes terrible violent horrific ideologies are just that. If I’m prejudiced for that opinion, than that means you’re just …
/r/MensRights15/07/21 07:29 PM
3

Ok, well that was why myself and probably others interpreted it that way.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 01:34 PM
3

Yes, you said “it is different” and then made your ridiculous analogy because you are comparing them. The point is that it isn’t different. They are both horrific and shouldn’t be done. The only reason you would argue that they are different is because you are trying to argue that one is worse than the other.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 01:27 PM
2

FGM is akin to you having the head of your dick removed - at 15 years old - while you are awake & not numb - and then sewing shut the foreskin so your wife can rip it all apart later on. The only reason to make this analogy is because you are comparing MGM & FGM. With this analogy you are effectively saying “MGM would be comparable to FGM if they [your made up scenario].” Thus you are arguing that FGM is worse than MGM.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 01:19 PM
3

You didn’t downplay men’s suffering. But you did then go on to say that FGM was worse. You can argue that FGM is worse without downplaying MGM, and that is what you did.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 01:12 PM
3

Please do not take my comment as downplaying the pain and emotional trauma men can suffer from because of circumcision - I am not. But FGM is different than circumcision and that is why it is treated differently in a medical and legal sense. It is not the same ritual. FGM is akin to you having the head of your dick removed - at 15 years old - while you are awake & not numb - and then sewing shut the foreskin so your wife can rip it all apart later on. This is literally you arguing that FGM is wo…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 12:56 PM
3

Raise your sons and daughters to be good people.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:05 PM
52

The answer is because they are sexist and racist.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 06:49 PM
2

In the words of Dave Chappelle, “if you can kill the kid I can at least abandon the fucker.”
/r/MensRights30/06/21 11:39 PM
1

You didn’t get my point. I was saying they are both wrong. Since you’d like to continue with the numbers game let’s address your claim that the “interactions in which the police were abusive” would be “a good amount higher.” We do in fact have those numbers. Check it out (Sources are linked in article). There were ~55.8M police interactions in 2019. Those interactions let to 26,000 excessive force complaints. That is only 0.047% of police interactions. Only 8% of those 26,000 complaints were sus…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 11:55 PM
2

When the media is objectively lying and misleading calling them “fake news” is not propaganda or slander it is the truth. Please just look at the recent news with the Wuhan Lab Leak cover-up and apply that lens to literally all news media. They are not telling you the truth, and when they are - it is not the whole truth. That makes them (gasp) fake.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:56 PM
3

Alright so let’s use your logic. Far less than 1% of police interactions use deadly force, therefore I can make a way better case than the BLM riots that it’s only a few bad apples and it’s not a big deal. You can’t call cops violent. The “defund the police” movement is mischaracterizing the vast majority of police, which are peaceful. There are no problems with the use of deadly force among police, because it occurs so infrequently.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:56 PM
4

So your argument is already in bad faith. 93% peaceful is not a good number. Imagine if car accidents happened 7% of the time you got in your car. Imagine if deadly force police interactions were anywhere near 7% rather than the reality, far far below 1%. Saying “93% peaceful” is double speak for “actually quite violent.”
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:20 PM
20

my comment was stating that you do have a choice as to whether or not to impregnate someone. Not if you’re raped.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 12:30 AM
19

These people are pointing out to you that when women are raped they still have a choice in whether to keep the kid. When men are raped they no longer have a choice in that. You’re stuck thinking about consensual sex. Everyone here agrees that if it is consensual of course the men have a choice. They are saying that in the non-consensual scenario, only the women are empowered. They are pointing out that your “just wrap it up” remark is not an end all be all solution. This is relevant to the subje…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 12:28 AM
4

Because you're standards are fat-phobic, sexist or transphobic or all 3. You are correct, I do not find fat feminist men attractive. Also, your*
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:41 AM
3

They get mad because some men (wrongly) have this idea that women can’t work in tech. And then they do things like this and hire incompetent women for “equity” and just perpetuate this idea to those men and giving more men the same idea, hurting their own cause. Just pure idiocy
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:03 PM
1

Ok so you have no examples of atheist rights being infringed. Preventing cheating in sports is not an infringement of rights.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:04 PM
1

We agree in regards to the GOP. But you have given no examples of trans or atheist rights at risk or being currently infringed yet you have made the claim more than once.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 10:12 PM
1

Obergefell v. Hodges solidified gay marriage in the eyes of the law. It isn’t going anywhere. Especially since Trump appointed more constitutionalists as Supreme Court justices. You also gave no examples of trans rights or atheist rights being infringed. Currently you are just making up falsehoods. And fuck the GOP, for real. Just spineless RINOs at this point.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 05:18 PM
3

Probably true but not sure we can prove that. Regardless, no one is claiming “all conservatives are pro-men’s rights” - that was a straw man put forward by OP. We are pointing out that while it is shades of gray on both sides, the left certainly has the largest overlap with ideologies that are anti-men.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 12:38 PM
9

I don’t think MRAs become righties. Righties become MRAs. In reality, real leftists just want social progress. This is a No True Scotsman.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 11:37 AM
9

Trump was the first president that was elected with a pro-gay marriage stance. What trans rights are being infringed? What atheist rights are being infringed? I am an atheist conservative. This idea that conservative want to take peoples rights is a false one perpetuated to you for very specific reasons that I urge you to consider.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 11:35 AM
12

I don’t see the value in posting an obviously biased post from /r/LEFTWINGmaleadvocates in order to try to bring political discussion into a politically neutral subreddit regarding men’s rights. The only purpose I can think of is that you are seeking validation from like-minded lefties - in which case I suggest remaining in the lefty subreddit. The post makes the observation that this subreddit seems to have a right-leaning demographic and then seeks to inform this demographic of the errors of t…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 06:02 AM
10

Meritocracy is patriarchal oppression
/r/MensRights27/05/21 03:44 PM
4

Thank you! Currently on my second listen of RoW :)
/r/MensRights26/05/21 10:07 PM
60

Their whole patriarchy thing is predicated on “cisgender white males” controlling society so it’s not irrelevant to mention his race
/r/MensRights26/05/21 08:17 PM
13

So women shouldn’t even tell their husbands or the one that they love? The post that was cross posted is shit but this take ain’t it
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:46 AM
16

approved leftthinker FTFY
/r/MensRights20/05/21 10:07 PM
16

Think about how much money a female panhandler receives versus a male panhandler. Society is more compassionate toward women
/r/MensRights18/05/21 10:03 PM
71

He’s not saying actual incels aren’t nuts. He’s saying the word gets thrown around a lot when it shouldn’t, specifically when you disagree with women.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 02:11 PM
3

Objectively false. There is a genetic difference.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 01:02 AM
3

In which case they are still a member of their assigned sex but they have chosen to mutilate themselves.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 12:01 AM
39

If this sub were banned it would be because Reddit has issues, not because we do. If trans people, that are less than 1% of the adult population, are allowed to have designated forums but men are not - that would be a gross violation of men’s rights. Don’t live in fear. Make them show their true colors. It brings more people to our side.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:10 PM
51

So, not women?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:33 PM
38

That commenter argues in bad faith all over this sub everyday.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 12:43 PM
23

Wooosh
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:51 PM
1

A myth. Just clean your dick.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:33 PM
2

There is a benchmark. We know that there were nerve endings cut off. You objectively lost feeling. You have less nerve endings. As for lubing & pain - not all circumsions are equal. As for girls complaining - I’d wager you are having sex with women that grew up in a culture where babies are circumcised. She doesn’t know the difference either. “Girls prefer it” is not a reason to mutilate babies. Again, these are likely women from a culture of circumcision. There is nothing wrong with them having…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:30 PM
5

Ok so you clearly enjoy mutilating babies. You have 50% less nerve endings Wash your fucking dick you disgusting weirdo Circumsion is objectively equivalent to FGM. You are mutilating baby genitals Wash your fucking dick you disgusting weirdo
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:23 PM
0

You’re not downvoted for asking. You’re downvoted for your remarks on cleanliness. Everybody has to wash their dick. Admitting your bias as an American doesn’t excuse it - you have been educated.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:21 PM
2

Of course you can feel it. But the fact of the matter is that circumsion causes a loss of nerve endings. It is an objective truth that you would feel more with more nerve endings.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:16 PM
4

So buy a gun. Now everyone is equal.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter