TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stunspot Archive

View 0 posts and 485 comments by stunspot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
37

"THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS GASLIGHTING AND YOU ONLY THINK THERE IS BECAUSE YOU'RE FUCKING CRAZY!"
/r/MensRights08/01/26 12:15 AM
1

Oh. Yeah, fair enough.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 05:43 PM
3

No. Jesus, its like they scripted you. "Organize! Protest! Make (respectful) noise!" No. We dont do bullshit 60's hippy playbook shit. Just live well man. Be honest unmoving and dont go along with your brainwashing.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:50 PM
2

Women require a hand up and external help to achieve what men do without. Noted. I will keep that in mind in the future.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 03:23 AM
2

Guilt and shame.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 07:33 PM
1

Nope. Stop trying to steal unearned credibility. It's a "job" you only need to pass the practical to get, can't get fired from, and dont get paid for. That isn't the same class of thing as employment.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 11:18 PM
14

Now introduce race.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 03:19 PM
1

Nope its valuable and good. Not a job. Stop trying to borrow legitimacy. And you are "paid" - you get to reproduce while having your bills paid, shelter and food provided, etc. You only think such in unpaid because you cannot value anything done by a man.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 07:57 AM
1

I literally said "they are not your enemies and deserve to have their voices considered even if foolish". And you ex communicate me. As a splitter driving wedges. Uh huh.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:05 PM
1

I would happily punch an Andrew Tate in the face. I'd take him over Scott Galloway any day of the week.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 03:12 PM
5

No. You dont defeat ideas by silencing them. They are men too. They have standing to give their perspective. I think they are silly and wrong, but i have no right to say they can't speak. Argue. Show why they are foolish. Don't start acting like a bunch of girls who require groupthink.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 03:11 PM
2

Oohhhhh! You're a bot! Got it. Sent to Gina up strife. I mean you are literally arguing about definitions. OK. Ignored.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:51 PM
3

You're what, 12? Grow up. I can trivially show dictionary definitions that support me. Why bother though? You'll just say they aren't the "real" definition.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:42 PM
2

That's "opposition". Jesus. You fucking kids. People can think you wrong and be on your side. Look at the left - a purity spiral is always a firing squad standing in a circle.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:36 PM
17

No. An enemy seeks to do you harm out of malice. They may be wrong or harmful or misguided but they dont seek your downfall. It's like the abortion debate: when one side says the other wants to "kill babies" or "control women", they are both lying. They disagree about the basic definitions. Just like here, you and the trads disagree about "How should a man behave?". You both want men to flourish.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:31 PM
24

Not enemies. They just disagree with you.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:13 PM
9

It's not a "job" if you can't be fired.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 11:52 PM
1

I... might be able to help, or at least advise. I need a better understanding of your needs. You have a large dataset if horror. What do you need done with it? Maintaining it? Using it as evidence or leverage? Producing cathartic work? If I might suggest, just being "someone" to talk to might be your best use of ai. I've built such for mental health and therapists before. What do you need, friend?
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:31 AM
12

Er... can you think of ANY character flaw or personal failing for which women ARE held accountable or shamed.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:18 PM
14

It's very very sad. I miss women. They were kind and pleasant and made the world better. They were worth fighting for. These creatures today are just repellant.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 04:12 PM
2

Well, coding. Special case.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:26 PM
6

Now consider the flip side. Women - particularly the more unhinged types of western modern gal - are uniquely suited to het nuked by AI. I own an AI company and am a minor figure of note in Ai prompting circles. And let me tell you? They are in trouble. AI is always ready to talk. Always ready to listen. Prone to yes manning and sycophancy, it's the ultimate Yass, kaween! Anything in words becomes its reality. It is not bothered by logical inconsistencies and will happily support "your truth". I…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:24 PM
5

This is the year they come after perceived "incels". If you aren't blue pill, you're getting canceled.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 01:52 PM
32

Why are you bothering, bro? It's not an honest argument from their side.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 12:59 PM
28

They have no empathy for someone who doesn't process emotions like they do and no attraction to someone who does. Because we're not obsessed talking about every social interaction, they see us as not caring. Because we don't have the same emotional maze they do, they see our ease of processing as laziness and feel obligated to do unasked for and unwelcome 'emotional labor' they then resent. They cannot respect an equal and are not attracted to men they can't respect thus are only attracted to me…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 12:20 PM
1

There's plenty of content out there about how society does not see intrinsic value in men. When a man internalized this, he becomes MUCH more tractable and predictable. It's good for business, good for government, good for women. It's just the men who have to get destroyed.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:05 PM
3

Because we were taught it wasn't worth anything.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 08:11 AM
8

Learn how to talk to ai.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:43 AM
1

Yes, it is. See above where I referred to "cockeyed ideas". Who the heck said "and nothing more"? I very explicitly tried to communicate this, but you decided to ignore it. LISTEN: Men view almost all women almost all the time through a sexual lens. It is UTTERLY AND COMPLETELY ORGTHOGONAL to the question of whether she's viewed as anything else. The two concepts have _nothing_ to do with each other. Men will view women sexually. That is normal and healthy. It is _you_ who have the problem. You …
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:58 AM
1

And there's NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. This is the problem: masculine sexuality is seen as evil and anything that treats it as healthy and normal is suspect. Men are _supposed_ to look at women sexually. It's only when women get the cockeyed idea that that just because sex is almost always present that it's the only thing present that problems arise. Being seen as an object of sexual desire does not dehumanize, remove agency, or deny identity. Telling men that they're evil for acting in a healthy …
/r/MensRights03/04/23 09:41 AM
9

That is an article of faith, not a description of reality.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 02:58 PM
14

This is absolutely, totally and completely wrong in the IT field. There is a chronic underestimation of both the efforts and necessity of the work. As long as it's not broken, you aren't perceived as working. When it does stop working, you seem incompetent. Loudly (or rather, professionally but prominently) ensure others see your struggles or you and your whole department is boned. I'm sure this holds in other industries as well.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/23 07:45 PM
1

I'm just sick of being continually told over and over that I should be ashamed to be male. Whether it's the way I use words, or the way I occupy space, to anything at all related to normal masculine sexuality - if it's the male way of doing it, it's the wrong way of doing it.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/23 12:09 PM
5

Equity very explicitly means equality of outcome regardless of input.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:51 PM
5

I was just thinking about this the other day - a Creed is a damned good idea. There's still a lot of legal language left over from anti catholic sentiments that prohibit discrimination based on Creed. How about: "I affirm that it is morally and ethically wrong to treat people differently because of their race, gender, or sexual orientation." That's the creed I live by. Shoots the wokanistas in the foot because they can't reasonably disagree without adding a ton of codicils and corrallaries that …
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:49 PM
6

I've just come to the firm conclusion that the only people who need protection and provisioning are children. If you don't make your own living arrangements and see to your own physical safety, I can't respect you as a functioning adult, barring medical issues and such - stuff happens. Women have had 12,000 years of being provisioned, at least. About time they started doing their part. Remember: the sine qua non of justice and fairness are that the same rules are known and apply to everyone. Whe…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/23 07:32 PM
2

Eh, had to unsubscribe Pearl. Every. Single. Guy. She has on is a black meathead. I mean, nothing wrong with that, but there's absolutely no diversity of thought.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 04:33 AM
1

I spent years arguing these issues with myself on this and numerous topics. I'm a smart guy so it's pretty easy for me to fall into the trap of arrogance. It's something I'm always watchful for. Combined with a natural inclination towards model agnosticism, I tend to deeply question my own perceptions. But y'know what? After decades on this planet and thinking about these things, eventually I came to the conclusion that, nope, the problem really IS them, not me. A bold statement in this age of t…
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/23 10:29 PM
1

No, but the reason for it matters. Is it high because she's sex positive and likes bonin'? Fine. Is it high because she only feels validated and complete when a man pays attention to her? Not good. Low because she thinks sharing her body without love is devalues hersrlf? Ok. Low because she's scared of sex and uncomfortable in her body? Pass.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 10:40 PM
5

Every mother in history has had assurance as to paternity. Any woman who would deny a man the same surity is suspect. If she doesn't want a paternity test,you absoLUTEly need one.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 10:23 PM
15

But... I thought we were supposed to ignore and dismiss any concerns the "incels" have? Isn't that how it works?
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:46 AM
16

Learn the phrase "I will not...". Don't explain, don't excuse, just set boundaries.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:34 AM
3

"99% of all rapists start with masturbation! We need to ban it immediately!"
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/22 05:09 AM
0

It's not "not all men" - it's "virtually no men". Men have wider bell curves. The most violent will be male. But almost no males are in that category. These people are not... well, let's be generous and call their thinking "fuzzy".
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/22 05:08 AM
-1

Not following your logic at all. You can't go from the general fact that women as a class don't take commitment seriously to any specific woman's situation. Of course, the numbers being what they are, don't be surprised when it applies after you find out her specifics.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 02:53 AM
3

Ostracized? That's a bit more formal than I'm comfortable with. But one of my few rules/requirements for any prospect is that she be child free. Look, if I'm falling in love with someone, I want and expect to be the most important person in her life and vice versa. If she had kids, best I can hope for is fourth, after mom and the dog. So no don't think they need to be publicly shamed, but they do need to face the consequences of their choices. They picked the wrong guy to have a kid with or got …
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 02:44 AM
6

I think anyone who listens to what women say they want is in for a disappointment.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:34 AM
2

Sounds like a them problem not an us problem. When I can by a sex toy at Walgreens with the same level of variety and lack of shame as women then we can talk.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 10:48 AM
-1

You act like they go have no responsibility for reinforcing those ideas. "Don't hate the player, hate the game." Well, there wouldn't be any game if it weren't for the players. You see a ton of this materialist crap in the manosphere. "Get your bag! If you aren't working on wealth, you're wasting your time". Ever notice how the people who endorse a system are those who benefit from it? No, every single one of these guys is letting his value system be determined by what women value. Women want mo…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 10:34 AM
26

I think Samuels' term is the most illustrative: S.I.G.N. Language. Shaming, Insulting, and Guilting, combined with a Need to be right. It's the go to argument strategy of most women confronted by an argument they can't abide made by a man. I call them on it. I'll explicitly name the behavior and ask them to respond without recourse to s.i.g.n. language. Usually leaves them flat-footed and silent.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 10:09 AM
37

Her body, her choice. Her choice, her responsibility. If men are to be expected to be equally responsible for those children, then they need equal rights regarding them.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 12:02 AM
2

Typical s.i.g.n. language. Anything bad a woman does is ultimately the fault of a man, always. Accountability is a foreign concept.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 10:01 PM
9

I suspect her "not being super agreeable" is probably more accurately called "being super disagreeable".
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 09:50 AM
1

Well, that's a start. You need to admit the problem before you can fix it.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/22 06:39 AM
2

Well, I'd respond with a couple of points. First, you're taking a REALLY essentialist position. "It's what we are". Men are just as emotional as women, we just process them a little differently and seem to be a bit more adept at acting from logic when our emotions are high. Not much though, and much of that is cultural. How many times has a woman thrown a tantrum and acted emotionally simply because she's been allowed to act that way without rebuke her whole life? How would she have behaved had …
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/22 07:05 AM
18

For me it's simple: you can either be an adult, support yourself, and have self-determination, or you're child who needs protection and provisioning and cannot be trusted to manage their own affairs. Through most of history woman have been in the second category, largely because of reproductive reasons. Now they want to step forward and have autonomy. Fine, but that means you don't get to be taken care of. A princess had very few choices in her life. Personally, I want a woman who can be a partn…
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/22 03:33 PM
7

I usually call them out for using the word and point out it's exactly the same as slut-shaming, except being a slut is a lot easier and more fun.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:56 AM
-1

Big fan of the comics. Chose to not see the show once they started reporting how woke it was going to be. Sounds like I made the right choice.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 11:32 AM
3

Men are much more likely to be assaulted yet women are the ones who live in fear. I honestly think it's because they refuse to inculcate personal physical courage as a virtue. I mean, when someone is described as a coward, are you ever thinking of a woman? No, because cowardice is the default norm. I mean, our mere gaze is enough to screw up the day of these fragile flowers. And then they demand respect.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:23 PM
2

No, in a war both sides fight.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 09:50 PM
3

The sine qua non of fairness and justice is that the same rules apply to everyone. When someone has their own special rules, they are, literally, etymologically privileged. "Privilege" is privi+ lege. Private laws.And privilege is the opposite of justice.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 09:10 PM
4

For me, the most glaring problem is that 95% of workplace fatalities are men. I think women are capable of anything men can do. The fact that they refuse to is utterly damning of the gender as a broadly generalized class.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:07 PM
7

"Light entertainment"? Dude. A lot of people will find YTLM to be extremely challenging. But mean, it's a favorite of mine (I didn't even give the show a single watch - miss me with that woke crap) but I would never in a million years describe it as "light".
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 12:44 PM
7

Men and white people are not considered marginalized populations by reddit, therefore it is impossible to direct hate speech at them. That's the line, anyhow. This is explicitly stated policy. No, kill all men isn't considered hate speech by reddit.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:38 PM
3

Why is the word "sex" censored? I mean it's already a euphemism for rape and you STILL censor it? You realize that this makes it UTTERLY IMPOSSIBLE to respect your opinion, right? You have taken a child's refuge from the world. You are ultimately a coward that does not deserve respect. Next time remember: if you can't type the word, you don't have the right to an opinion on the subject, you pewling coward.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 07:02 PM
20

We need 500 more.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:58 PM
7

They grew up watching Buffy and the like. "Strong female protagonists". Many don't actually realize that the average guy can swat the average gal like a fly. Of course, then they turn around and display raw cowardice when face to face with conflict or risk. "Oh, I feel unsafe walking home alone!" Well, so do I. Woman the fuck up.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:16 PM
13

When asked about my 'No single moms' rule, I always say this : "If I am falling in love with someone, I want and expect to be the most important person in her life and vice versa. I do not think this is childish or unreasonable. If she has children, this will never be the case." I have consistently left people wordless, unable to argue further with that.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 12:17 PM
8

The thing is... It IS like Satanism. Satanists are EXTREMELY into personal autonomy and subsequent responsibilities. I haven't checked but their core doctrines practically demand they be pro-choice. I don't get it - where's the objection here? I mean, it's kinda sick that she restricts her granting of rights to "people with uteruses". Is that what you were getting at?
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 04:42 AM
1

Man, women are always mad about something and it's usually bullshit. I just don't feel like running out to hunt for the wolf yet again. If she gets eaten this time... Well, then I guess she's finally got something worth being mad about.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 12:30 AM
40

That's an interesting point about Serious Suicide Attempts. Didn't know that.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:48 PM
10

"Get what you want, then broom her fast." She's already proven herself to be human garbage.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/22 10:54 AM
1

"YOUR kids". Not "THEIR kids". That's the crux of it. Ride the CC for all the years you want. Just don't think I'm obligated to support the consequences, you appalling woman-child.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 10:40 AM
1

That is very kind and very ignorant of you.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:52 PM
2

It's not my place to say what someone should be attracted to. That said, if you have a laundry list of requirements and you put height or money on it, I know you're human garbage and I don't want anything to do with you. That's MY right to be attracted, or in this case, repelled.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:37 PM
13

"When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you."
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 12:11 PM
1

Hah! I wonder hoe many people this pisses off will get the premise of the joke?
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/22 02:58 PM
4

Why bother sticking around, though? I have completely rejected by society. I have no place here. No one wants me here and I don't want to be surrounded by people that want me gone. There is nothing worth living for.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:57 PM
42

The important thing is that no, it's not misogynistic. Misogynists hate women. Many MGTOW think that they aren't worth pursuing. Most say this isn't because of their inherent womanly nature, but because of the current culture. That is, it's a decision predicated upon actual behvioer, not some sexist ideal and that behavior can and will change over time. Right now? The juice ain't worth the squeeze. This utterly infuriates feminists. Men are NOT supposed to be the ones doing the rejecting. Furthe…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:47 PM
10

Neither. They are simply nakedly, graspingly self-serving in every possible way. They will fight tooth an nail for any advantage regardless of its effect on others. They are selfish, not stupid.
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/22 02:25 PM
8

Any sufficiently extreme philosophy becomes self-parody and thus impossible to satirize. You just wind up with another "normal" example, like here
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/22 02:19 PM
4

They can't abide "mansplaining" because of womancrazies.
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/22 11:34 AM
10

Notice how merely contemplating male sexuality makes her physically sick? Don't fall for the lie. There's absolutely nothing wrong or sinful about lust. I wonder how the OP would react of you let her know that virtually every male she's ever known has had an orgasm while thinking about having sex with her? Complete meltdown. See, male sexuality is something they absolutely CANNOT control. They try and try and fail and fail. When they can't surpress it, they weaponize sexuality with OnlyFans and …
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 11:11 AM
-1

While I support your idea.... Man, no one gives a shit. Complaining that men get mistreated is like an 18th century French peasant complaining they don't have enough bread. "Let them eat cake!"
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:54 AM
20

Whenever I see behavior like this I always think "Man, they are a bunch of pussies". It's important to know that that's not a swear word or related to genitals or cats. It's short for "pusilanimous", meaning weak, cowardly, and callow. Their ideas are so look poor - so very fragile - that the merest disagreement calls their viability into question. And they are pussies who can't abide any contention.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/22 09:14 PM
19

Doesn't exist and you've got internalized misandry. I am not INTERESTED in "advocating for feminism in positive way". I've spent my whole life listening into feminism being advocated. There are enough voices making sure women get more than their fair share. It comes off as judgy. Most of us CANNOT subscribe to 2X. They ban us for being us. Stop starting with the assumption that "advocating for feminism" is in any way a positive. I am an EGALITATIAN. I think people should be treated equally by so…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:10 PM
12

I'm in a similar situation. I am completely rejected by society and have no value in it. And you know what? The more I look at modern women, the more I come to the conclusion that the grapes actually really truly ARE sour! Or to paraphrase Rick Sanchez: "Your boos mean nothing to me! I've seen what makes you cheer!" Yes, it is terrible to be excluded the way you are. But what you're being excluded from is actually pretty god-awful. I take some comfort from that.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:32 AM
6

Anyone who uses the word "mansplaining" to me will very quickly come to understand a new term: manyelling. I will go the fuck OFF on any sexist jerk who thinks my words are worth less because of my gender.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 10:58 AM
-1

Oh my GOD, are you such a child that you need explicit rules with numbers of hours worked out like a contract? That will never work and you're not mature enough to have a real relationship. Adults can work with productive ambiguity. What does "a full-time job's worth of work" mean? It means A FULL TIME JOB'S WORTH OF WORK! You know how much you have to work at job that's full-time? That much. It should be pretty obvious if the housebound person is doing less than, more than, or equal to their fa…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:45 PM
18

If someone doesn't have a job, they damned well better be putting in a full-time job's worth of housework. Anything left over should be split evenly. It's about fair division of labor.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 12:57 AM
5

It's been explicitly stated numerous times that their official policy us that is if it's against white, male, or cis, hate speech is welcomed.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 03:37 AM
53

"Excuse me, did you just assume I'm male?"
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 02:29 PM
1

Yuh. Volcel is to MGTOW as Atheist is to Agnostic.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 01:18 AM
1

Why is her bad behavior and inability to stand up on her own the fault of men? Men behave poorly? Men's fault. Women behave poorly? Men's fault. And they wonder why so many guys are going their own way.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 12:12 AM
0

She's kinda got a point. Imagine if the name were "Shenequa" or "Kwan".
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/22 08:25 PM
19

It's the official, stated policy. The concept of "fairness" and "the same rules apply to everyone" have gone right out the window. They're fighting imaginary privilege by creating real privilege.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 01:52 PM
27

Getting an apology from a woman is like getting milk from an alligator.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:36 AM
128

They were banned for having the temerity to treat trans people the way they treat men. It's still ok to use hate speech on reddit if it's against straight, white, and/or male people.
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 11:32 AM
5

Maybe try listening to and addressing their concerns instead of ridiculing them.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/22 12:20 PM
1

They aren't being hypocritcal. They care more about people they know. That is a basic universal of human psychology. Celebrities are a new phenomenon from an evolutionary perspective in that we know them but they don't know us. They still trigger the "in the tribe" mechanisms.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:47 PM
2

Oh my god! People are sexually attracted to the kind of person they imprinted upon when coming to sexual maturity! Younger gals are sexier! Stop the fucking presses because that's not fair!
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/22 01:27 PM
2

Reddit is by no means a safe space to express such attitudes. Anything that is not 100% fully in support of the most "progressive" ideals is cause for banning. I am pro-egalitarian. I think it's the sine qua non of fairness that the same rules apply to everyone. Feminists are pro-women. I'm pro-people. That tension often results in them being anti-men and me being anti-feminist. I think women and men are equal and should be treated equally. I think they often aren't. Where I differ with feminist…
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/22 01:11 PM
4

I would immediately put up a sign next to it explaining the exchange rates for blowjobs to emotional support.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 08:22 AM
5

Well... Yeah. Of course. They are morally equivalent terms. You're acting like you expect equal treatment. Don't. You are a second class citizen and do not get equal treatment.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 08:15 AM
5

My tow is about what you do as an individual. It is in no way incompatible with bring an mra.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 10:25 AM
2

You are 100% on the mark. They have convinced society that women's ways of processing emotions are the only appropriate way to feel them. You ever hear a woman exhorted to "get in touch with her masculine side"?
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:51 PM
1

Everyone who disagrees with them gets called names. It's their go-to move.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:22 AM
2

Y'know, if these stats were about "black people" instead of "men", this would be accepted as proof that the cops were racist.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 09:08 AM
1

Yes. The problem is that they are supposed to be the ones doing the rejecting.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/22 08:38 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:16 AM
35

Women are valued. Men have to fight and scrap for any value we achieve. Until that changes, everything you talked about, and all the rest you didn't, will not get better. I really wish I could n just talk to all the women in my culture and tell them that we are not their providers or their protectors. They have to do that stuff for themselves. Responsibility goes hand in hand with autonomy, and far far FAR too many women never accept any culpability for their actions. Just look at the media. Com…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:42 PM
12

"Better not hire a black man". Yeah, that kinda puts it in stark relief, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:18 PM
0

Yes, we should, immediately. It's grossly unfair and it's counter-productive. It's a program that makes it impossible to respect the accomplishments of the people who take advantage of it. It also does those people a disservice by putting them in positions they aren't qualified for. No, affirmative action is a terrible stain on our collective ethics and history will view it with abhorrence.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:06 PM
2

Either sounds like a better deal than many of us have now.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:45 PM
9

It's lies and FUD. I have literally never once seen anyone of any label in the manosphere call for violence.
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 05:54 PM
1

I'm still pretty pissed it got banned. If you can think of a way to do it, go for it. But they'll just lie and lie and lie some more then shut down whatever you set up.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 12:27 AM
2

Didn't say boys have it better. Seems like a universal shit show over there.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 05:01 PM
3

Depends on where you're talking about. In America? Yeah. In Afghanistan? No.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 04:32 AM
2

Careful. You're dangerously close to a Banned Philosophy.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:22 PM
1

If you aren't mature enough to write the word "rape" without censorship, your opinions on the subject aren't worth consideration.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 02:27 AM
9

Why would I want a bitch?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:19 PM
11

I've head this conversation, nearly verbatim, on numerous occasions. It's absolutely accurate.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 12:14 PM
7

I'm sure that's what you believe.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/22 04:36 PM
19

Men Going Their Own Way. It's a perspective/philosophy that says that the juice ain't worth the squeeze, that modern women are a lot more bother than they're worth and you should focus your life on self-improvement and personal joy. Many feminists think it the worst strain of misogyny and consider it exactly equivalent and equal to the imaginary Incels who think women are inferior and owe them sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/22 02:31 PM
12

When I see this, all I see is a measure of how little women are stepping up to their responsibilities. The headline should be "Women's Labor Gap".
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 01:53 PM
27

What's particularly depressing is that reddit allows such trash. I mean, the guys at MGTOW advocated living alone, not marrying, and living a life free of women. Result? BANHAMMER for "misogyny". FDS regularly espouses gendercide and male subjugation. Result? "MeN aNd WhItE pEoPlE aren't A pRoTeCtEd ClAsS".
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/22 01:48 PM
26

Haven't you heard? EvErY mOnTh Is MeN's HiStOrY mOnTh! Sigh. Just get used to it: you will not be celebrated. You are not valued. Society does not want you. The fact that society has been, by and large, created by men is irrelevant. The contributions of men are irrelevant. You are a man: you do not have value - you ACHIEVE value.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:27 PM
4

I think that women aren't conditioned to view their own cowardice with shame. Their relationship to the virtue of courage is very different than that of men's.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:46 PM
2

They think human rights are a zero-sum game and that women, as the clearly superior gender, deserve the bulk of them to men's exclusion.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:59 PM
18

While I can appreciate the thought, perhaps it wouldn't be the best idea to fill the military with cowards.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:31 PM
1

Yes. These women do not have a shred of kindness, if you are male. They lack basic human decency.
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/22 12:15 PM
5

I'm just based as fuck and waiting to get banned.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:19 PM
125

It's about time they learned that with the whole "men are not our providers" thing goes the "men are not our protectors" thing. If you want to take part in society, you have to step up to your responsibilities and women are not. They don't do their part in any of the worse jobs: construction, garbage, warrior, farmer. They want men to get on with all the hard stuff but still want all the privileges that come with it. Of course, I'm speaking collectively, so individual responsibilities will vary.…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:38 PM
3

If the biggest flaw in modern feminism is hypocrisy, it's second greatest is cowardice. It's a problem that pervades our society but is drawn into sharp relief when useless people like this woman start talking.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 08:20 PM
0

Seen a few vids. I watch Better Bachelor with Joker pretty frequently.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 08:15 PM
6

Red pillers want to game the system and look for ever more effective ways to manipulate women. Blue pillers accept modern gender roles and will always put themselves second after women. Black pill is a controversial term. To some it means the worst of the worst incel misogynist who think women owe them sex (I've never actually seen one of these in the wild - more boogie man than legitimate concern). And some people apply it to MGTOW, which is very confusing as its philosophy is very different. M…
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 02:08 PM
16

Oh noes! The existence of edge cases! Time to abandon the category... Get real. Almost everyone is either male or female. The fact that there's a few who aren't doesn't really matter. Gender and sex are the same thing.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 06:25 PM
165

If it's something an anthropologist can figure out by looking at your bones, it's probably a good indicator that it's not a social construct.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 02:31 PM
3

I treat women exactly like I'd treat men, as far as such things go. I expect and demand them to show the same personal and interpersonal courage society would demand of a man. I don't respect cowards, regardless of their gender.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:11 AM
10

Honestly, man? It kinda sounds like it might be over already. If she's using threats like that, even obliquely, about something so fundamentally important... well, most divorces are initiated by the woman. Men tend to want to stay in the relationship in hopes of positive change or a lack of knowledge about what problems she's having. Her saying "I'm not sure where that leaves us..." should leave you pretty clear on where that leaves you.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 05:39 AM
2

What you call "having to save face" when trembling inside is what I call "courage". Society defines courage as a prime virtue for men and is utterly irrelevant for women. I commend you for it. You have strength of character, which is woefully lacking in today's age of orthodoxy and pusilamininity.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 05:12 AM
10

His real "fault" is his gender.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 09:19 PM
1

Those rights weren't "withheld". They were non-existent until men chose to create them. Here's the last thing I'll say on the subject: YOU'RE WELCOME.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 01:25 AM
1

And who should have rights now that doesn't? When we identify them and give them rights, isn't that a good thing? No, you are judging those in the past using today's ethics... without recognizing the accomplishment of having created those ethics. You talk about this stuff like there's an objective truth about What Is Right and Wrong when what there is are decisions creating the categories.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 01:10 AM
1

And what will be the bare minimum tomorrow? What aren't we seeing now that will be seen then? Growth and positive change is praiseworthy.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:47 AM
-1

No, it isn't. It's the bare minimum NOW, thanks to the choices of men. Choosing to give up power, choosing to treat women as equals, overthrowing 6000 years of history and tradition is damned well worthy of praise. The invention and distribution of individual rights was revolutionary. I consider it one of the wonders of the modern world, right next to food and drug safety laws, building codes, and the internet. Put yourself in the position of a man of power in, say, 1910 America. You and your wi…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:37 AM
0

Don't fall into the trap of hating them for their collective flaws. But, no, you will only very rarely find allyship. It requires an admission of being in the wrong and most have been conditioned from birth to not accept responsibility for their actions. But, yeah, man. You sound like a textbook case on internalized misandry. If you want to fix that, you need to refocus your thoughts to be on men, rather than what women think of men. Think about all we have accomplished: we built the world. Phys…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:01 AM
14

He's right of course. I'm still pissed off about the way they emasculated Bill and Ted in the third movie: all of a sudden they had no musical skill, no respect, their sons were now daughters, the president of the future was female, and their world saving was retconned so their daughters could do it. Pure anti male garbage.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 09:41 PM
73

I'm pretty much mgtow at this point. I'd be willing to date a gal but I don't think I'm ever asking one out again. What I'd demand of her is pretty straightforward: she should be kind, smart enough to have a conversation, not physically repellant, and childless. That last one may be controversial, but the way I figure it, if I'm falling in love with someone, I want and expect to be the most important person in their life and vice versa. If she's got kids, that will never be the case. That's my l…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 04:08 AM
4

Well, it's common for a movie or show to have a scene with the guy saying "Baby, I'm sorry!". When it's the woman apologizing, the man almost always immediately replies " No, I'm sorry!". A naked apology, where a woman admits wrongdoing unreservedly, almost never happens. I can only think of two cases offhand and in both instances it was a Big Deal in the story that she apologized. It's that whole "Accountability" thing.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 01:51 AM
4

Yes. That is rather the point. If you can't publically stand by what you have to say, I don't want to hear it. I am beyond appalled at the atmosphere of pusilamity and cowardice that pervades Western culture these days. Say what you mean and say it with your name or at least a consistent pseudonym attached. And don't even get me started on "ghosting".
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 04:23 PM
4

I use apologies as my metric for a pseudo-complement to the Bechtel Test: Does a named woman apologize to a man without him apologizing back immediately? Once you start asking the question, it's amazing hoe much your perspective changes.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 03:53 PM
5

You can't be logical with some women.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 09:40 PM
1

It amazes me to no end how upset it makes people for men to simply say "Just leaves us alone already". It's like, if they reject you, that's natural and fine. You reject them? The whole fucking world will end.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 12:48 PM
1

I wonder how r/antiwork would take this advice...
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 07:19 PM
18

Careful, now! We don't mention the Forbidden Philosophy. It's way too dangerous. Just think of the economy!
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 07:03 PM
3

Speak for yourself. I'm pure egalitarian. I just recognize where men are getting a raw deal.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 05:20 AM
2

The words "intersectional" and "empowed" are just code words for "I am very unpleasant to be around". "Problematic" is code for "I don't like this but I would sound like an asshole if I explained why".
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 02:28 PM
2

To the extent feminism is antimale, I am antifeminist. It's a very simple equation and I don't think it an unfair standard.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 02:18 PM
2

If we're going to talk about women's responsibilities, then let's actually talk about them. How about: women are responsible for their own physical safety. No man should have to sacrifice his health and safety for a woman. Women are responsible for providing their own income and paying their own way in the world. Women are no longer chattel and do not deserve the protection and care they received as such. Women are responsible for not excluding fathers from their children's lives. Self-explanato…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:50 PM
5

A "privilege" by definition is something a minority has. It literally means "private law". If the majority has it, it's just a right. If you're not getting that right, by all means be pissed off, but don't call it "privilege". I hate that.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:43 PM
10

When society objectifies women, they are seen as sexual objects. When society objectifies men, those men die.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 02:24 PM
11

No no no. Men are supposed to listen not talk.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 01:25 AM
-1

I found it to be a pile of nonsense. If it turns out it only works for women, I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:54 PM
2

That sounds a lot like the Colonel's promise of 11 herbs and spices. It might be technically true, but the reality is all you'll find is salty greasy pepper.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:22 AM
9

Eh, most of the time, what I've seen are women who don't think - they just follow the indoctrination which says that men are universally dominant in all areas of society. If I believed that, I'd get upset at MRAs too. It's much more stupid than evil.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:20 AM
1

Well, I'm for the return of our first, second, fourth, fifth, and tenth amendments. I am pro gun and pro speech. Pro choice and anti-religion. I'm against capitalism as it's implemented. I'm fiercely egalitarian and think wokism is the worst thing to hit our culture since aids. I believe in evolution and science and technology and the environment and free speech. I think men's rights need a hell of a lot more advocacy. Most of my views are nuanced, complicated, very easy to misconstrue, and fair…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:06 AM
5

None of the above. Politically non-euclidean. The left has gone insane. The right enbraces evil as a virtue. The libertarians hate poor people and the environment. The greens are just stupid. I am not represented by any extant political movement or perspective.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:09 PM
20

There seems to be a fair amount of evidence that biology strongly influences behavior. Anyone who's honest will admit this. Just look at the behavioral effects of hormone replacement therapy or steroid abuse. There's evidence that the high testosterone levels males fetuses experience change their brains. Anyone who says gender is entirely a social construct is pushing an agenda.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 03:11 PM
16

This sub isn't about hating women, but rather, hating what some of them do. And you're a throw away account. Have some freakin' courage if you're gonna troll like that.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 04:42 PM
5

They didn't want to destroy her life?! Motherf--!!
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 04:10 PM
3

Or you can say "The juice ain't worth the squeeze", swear off any woman like that, maintain standards of sanity, and resign yourself to the fact that you will probably be alone.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:44 PM
13

Many MRAs are against feminism... as it is practiced. Many, myself inclided, find that modern feminism is not about equality between the sexes, but rather the naked, uncritical lionizing of women and excoriation of men. To the extent that a feminist is anti-men? I'm anti-feminist. If you are for equality, you will be called a sexist. If you critique a woman's misdeeds, you will be called a misogynist. If you're white, you will be called a racist. If you are straight, you will be called a homopho…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:40 PM
10

I'm just sick of being judged by women's standards. I process emotions, words, and nesting in VERY different ways than they do. And because of that, I get treated like a Bad Woman rather than a Good Man. I mean, flip the tables for once. How many women do you know can speak in Grunt, fluently? With a 'meaningless' syllable or two, I can have whole conversations with men that women are just blind to. Or have you ever seen a woman acknowledge a reverse nod greeting, as is common between men who ar…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 03:26 PM
-1

No, thank you. I think... Yeah, I think I've had enough of "talking to girls". I'm going all in on the Forbidden Philosophy.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/22 01:41 PM
6

Careful. You're dangerously close to uttering one of the Forbidden Philosophies. Keep moving in your preferred direction.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 11:29 AM
5

Good for you! Misandry is something we cannot compromise on.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:31 PM
2

Give season 4 a miss. Noted.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 05:57 PM
8

Reddit, at least, won't take it down. It is their official position that hate speech is allowed if directed at white people or men.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 04:47 AM
9

Anyone male you disagree with.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 04:34 AM
4

Man, do they not see how much danger they are creating? We're getting an ever larger group of young men with no buy in to society being told that their methods are violent and terroristic. Keep that up and a bunch of them will be! It's like they've never heard of the Boxer Rebellion. This is a crisis I see having a high likelyhood of extreme violence. And in case it's not obvious, this is a warning not a threat. If they don't stop treating men like garbage, they will provoke a world of hurt even…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 04:15 AM
8

An kind once again we cater to womens' fear. There will never be adequate mutual respect between the sexes until women start embracing courage. Being "uncomfortable" in mixed a gendered settings is a personal problem that should be overcome, not accommodated.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:59 PM
5

Horse. Shit. No one can "apologize on their behalf" - that's not what an apology is. It necessarily involves taking responsibility. I didn't do anything. And besides, any such apology would need to inc!ude the Africans who sold the fucking slaves. Why is it my job to soothe their self-esteem? I have said nothing untrue.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:11 PM
11

Precisely my point. I never owned a slave. Most of my ancestors at the time were indentured servants. While the ruling class owned black people, they leased white ones then worked them to death. (Average indenture was seven years. Average lifespan was four.) And I'm supposed to apologize for that?! No, I humbly, with all due respect, invite you to autofornicate.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:27 PM
32

Collective. Guilt. Is. Wrong.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:09 AM
2

Eeeeeek! Biological essentialism! Run for the hills!
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:38 AM
54

Anything that can be disrupted merely by pointing my eyes at it is something I don't have to respect. If you're that fragile, that my mere looking at you makes you uncomfortable, well, that's your problem. They are so terrified and cowardly when it comes to the tiniest hint of male sexuality. The true "power of the male gaze" is that it reminds them that we exist. And that is crime enough to some.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:38 AM
40

When you hold a group of people responsible for what only a few do. Like demanding white people apologize for slavery or demanding black people apologize for 52% of the murders in the US.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:50 AM
117

Never accept collective guilt.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:28 PM
6

"Egalitarian" is how I usually self-describe when discussing this area of politics.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/22 05:10 PM
20

I just liked his point about "self-identifying". "I self-identify as brilliant and handsome. Those are 'my adjectives'. I insist you use those words when describing me.". Instantly shows how goofy these arguments are.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/22 05:05 PM
3

The ones that kill me are the gals who say, "But feminism in about mens' issues, too!" I usually say "Name five mens' issues.... that aren't "issues" women have with men."
/r/MensRights21/01/22 09:48 PM
7

Feminism is what living self-described feminists do, not what they say. No "No true Scotsman" arguments receive any positive reception around here.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/22 09:33 PM
2

Oh yeah.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 08:35 PM
5

No, we need to start holding women accountable for being cowardly. They need to start embracing personal physical courage as a virtue. Until they do, it's hard to respect them. Men are more likely to be assaulted and more competent at road repairs. That doesn't mean "Give special treatment to women", it means " Isn't about time women stopped bitching and stepped up?".
/r/MensRights21/01/22 07:57 PM
7

I was expecting it. I doubt I was alone.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 07:23 PM
1

That is a damned good argument! Thanks for sharing it.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 06:09 PM
2

I wonder how people who make such arguments feel about black-on-black crime...
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:27 PM
7

I thought men were more likely to be victims of assault, though...
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:36 AM
23

Oh, they want "equality" all right. The same kind as in Animal Farm.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:18 PM
5

Maybe. Labels don't mean much. It would depend on the specifics. Like, if she were truly an egalitarian who thought feminism was the only way to achieve equality, that at least leaves room for growth. I'd show her "The Red Pill" movie and see how she reacts.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 03:05 PM
13

Careful with that logo. Guys moving in a preferred direction are mega-banned on reddit. It's the most terrifying philosophical position they have to deal with. Men noping out is an existential threat to all of society.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:02 PM
9

If you do not accept their worldview in its entirety, they think you are attacking them. If you threaten their ideas at all, they react in typical mammalian second-circuit dominance territoriality, flinging poo and ink in copious amounts. Any minor disagreement is an assault. And this is because they know - deep down, they know - that their ideas are weak and pitiful things that wither in the light of honest inquiry. Arguing for equality will always get you attacked by those who think they deser…
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 02:45 PM
4

Hey! I understood that slang! Hello fellow young people. How about that EDM and the TikToks and whatever other scrap is popular?
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 02:25 PM
6

Christ. I've never been so grateful for the equal protection clause in the US Constitution. At least it gives us a place to stand.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 02:17 PM
0

And since men gave women the vote, any woman who "don't need no man" can do without either.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 04:33 AM
1

They're just so... pusilanimous. Any idea that isn't already in their heads makes them whine and pewl like someone lit their puppy on fire. So weak.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 03:25 PM
3

Yeah, they're also known as males moving their preferred direction but with synonyms. I hesitate to even mention them by name as the ban hammer hangs heavily over them.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 05:42 AM
9

And let's not forget Black Pill. They say the game isn't worth playing and nope out on the whole issue of women.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 03:52 AM
10

Nice to see the moderators not reaching for the banhammer. It proves these ideas are stronger than theirs. These ideas can withstand scrutiny.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 01:56 AM
6

Feminism is what feminists do, not what they say. And they are often very different.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 01:41 AM
1

How long has it been since the last time a woman apologized to you? An apology where you don't immediately turn it around and say "Oh, no, it was my fault"?
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 09:57 PM
4

Is this post trolling? You need to find better things to do. Or you could stick around, maybe listen to what we have to say, put away the snark, and you might find some of our perspectives enlightening.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 08:42 PM
9

One aspect you're overlooking is that MGTOW views your course's payout as far lower than you do. I can understand the perspective - I don't want a woman who requires X of me: her requiring it lowers her value in my eyes. We can all agree on some values of X. Like... Height. If a woman won't date you because you're too short, she's too shallow to want at all. MGTOW simply says that X = most requirements of most women.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 06:02 PM
1

It's treating people like they are a group is the problem. It's a staple of lefty politics that any white man has more power than any black woman, even if the guy is homeless and the lady is Oprah. No, you have to treat people as individuals. These are problems that require a scalpel not the Procrustean chainsaw of identity politics.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 12:11 PM
2

That's certainly true, though not where I was coming from. I think my issues with the left can be summed up with a simple litmus test: People should not be treated differently because of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or other intrinsic group. If you can't agree with that, I don't want to know you. Many on the left cannot agree with that. This leads them to bizarre twisted definitions of things like "racism" and "privilege" that simply make no sense. When I say they are crazy, I am not …
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 12:37 AM
1

That which focusses on identity politics and intersectionalitt.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 07:27 PM
-1

Show me in the Constitution where it defines a fetus as a child.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 06:00 PM
-2

I was thinking about things like safety nets, abortion rights, their willingness to felate big business at the cost of the masses, and their general "fuck the losers!" vibe.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 05:48 PM
3

From my perspective the Right has had "Embrace EVIl!" as a campaign plank since day one. They treat people like things and deserve nought but scorn.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 04:13 PM
7

The left is crazy. The right is evil. Libertarians hate poor people and the environment. Authortarians hate everybody. No, there are no good choices in the current political paradigm.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/22 03:18 PM
4

"Problematic" is just a code word for "I don't like it but would sound like an asshole if I explained why".
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 05:37 PM
1

Better in the car than after lights out at bedtime.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 07:33 PM
-2

No, I'm sorry, but you're just wrong. Some women are just plain bad at sex.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/22 07:30 PM
2

When I had that job, I was "lucky" in that there were about 500 cameras pointed at me at any given time and this was obvious to everyone. Helped defuse such situations by being able to just point at the black plastic bubble on the ceiling without saying' a word.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 03:07 PM
-9

Because we want to be better than they have been.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/22 01:11 PM
1

No, it's not a spectrum. Spectra are one dimensional. I am complicated, my views are nuanced, and I rarely see my priorities expressed in po!itics. The Left have gone pants shittingly insane. The Right has always had "Embrace Evil!" as a key talking point. The Libertarians hate poor people and the environment. None of them are anywhere close to representing me.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 05:44 PM
21

...in the office trailer.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/22 03:22 AM
5

Yeah, name calling is the usual, normal reaction. If you were a guy, they be calling you incel and mocking you for supposedly being a virgin. Those who oppose equal rights for men and women are some of the most reactionary, hide-bound, reflexively aggressive folks on the planet.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 01:53 PM
42

There is one surefire way to tell if a guy will be labeled immature: if he doesn't process emotions, words, and nesting in the way that a woman would, then he is "immature".
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:30 PM
16

Having IBS really, really, REALLY matters. You have a medical disability. If you're in the US they have to make a reasonable accommodation for you. Using an unused bathroom like you describe is quite reasonable. You could probably successfully sue them if you had let them know beforehand.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 07:54 PM
7

Titanic. That's all I have to say.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 09:24 AM
2

I cope with it by embracing a now-banned philosophy, that's a synonym for males proceeding in a proprietary direction.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:27 PM
0

Your facts are sexist.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:58 AM
3

Well said.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:37 PM
1

Nope. I was speaking literally of my lived experience.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 01:50 PM
1

there was some good stuff in here, but overall it was pretty anemic.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/21 01:47 PM
3

An incompetent mother being undercut by the husband calling a skilled pediatrician when she refuses to.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:09 PM
3

Here's a lens I've found useful when considering media representation of men: when was the last time you saw a woman apologize to a man WITHOUT him apologizing back immediately? Where she admits to fault, promises not to do it again, and he DOESN'T say "Oh no, baby, it was my fault!"? It almost never ever happens. I've seen maybe three examples in 10 years. The cconverse though, where he apologizes to her? ALL. THE. TIME. Think about the semiotic payload here; the beliefs and attitudes such repr…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:06 PM
5

The phrase you're looking for is "Internalized Misandry".
/r/MensRights26/12/21 11:56 AM
-1

You've obviously never been in a coven with a pair of fat black lesbian gen fourth wave feminists. I have. It's not about race. No, shut up, listen to me: it's NOT about race. White people generally don't think about race. And that's not our privilege, that's everyone's right.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 11:49 AM
5

"scrotes that don't have anything to lose". That's the key right there. I've argued again and again that a strong social safety net is in everyone's best interest. You start with the worst characature you can think of. He's lazy. He's mean. He demands the world provide him a living. He contributes absolutely nothing to society. How do you handle that guy? You can wash your hands, say " Not my table", and abandon the guy to whatever may come. But then you wind up with a guy with zero investment i…
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/21 02:23 AM
26

Those are trigger words for me. I have absolutely ZERO problem straight up yelling at someone for using such language around me. I have on three occasions managed the impossible and got a woman to apologize.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 01:53 AM
13

No. You are not missing something.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 10:48 AM
11

That will happen if you get anywhere near men's issues. Sorry. One of the larger issues we face is simply getting people to believe we have other issues. Asserting anything other than the orthodox position that all men are more powerful and evil than all women WILL get you marked as aenethema to society. ... Yeah, those colored pills can be pretty bitter tasting at times.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 10:24 AM
18

The very concept of "accountability" is anathema to women like this.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 02:34 PM
6

What she said about men being reduced to "human doings" really hit home.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:36 PM
1

I really wish the narrator knew how to say the word "women".
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:50 PM
3

Exqctly. So often I want to yell "It's not my privilege, it's your right! If you're not getting it, yeah, be pissed off, but don't blame me for something I didn't do".
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/21 05:57 AM
10

Nope. That's the point.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 03:05 AM
4

A million times this. I have lost soooooo much respect for feminists from the ban happy way they react to having their ideas challenged. It's like, you can tell by the way they react that they don't actually have any real confidence in their ideas or they wouldn't wither away in the glare of dissent.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/21 02:33 AM
5

I'm not just anti-feminist, I'm anti-woke-in-general. I am fiercely egalitarian. I believe that having the same set of rules for everyone is a sine qua non for any kind of justice in society. Feminists usually advocate double standards. For example, can you agree with the statement "It is wrong to treat people differently because of their race, sexual orientation, or, in this case, gender."? No codicils, no addenda, no corrilaries. Can you agree with it as written? I can. I'm against affirmative…
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/21 02:22 AM
4

Talk about "victim blaming"! How can these monsters sleep at night?
/r/MensRights13/12/21 02:40 PM
2

Two standards.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 11:23 PM
21

Well written but you seem to have a lot of your self-definition tied in with how you relate to woman. You might want to examine that some.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 04:16 PM
27

Only as long as that gender isn't cismale.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 04:02 PM
-2

Man, you're asking for empathy for a man who done wrong. You're not gonna find it from most of society.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:49 PM
39

And that's exactly as relevant as the fact that it was men in absolute power who decided to give up that power and allow women a seat at the table of society. We gave their rights to them, voluntarily. A "thank you" for that is just as appropriate as bitching about the repressions that occurred before.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 02:57 PM
6

It really shouldn't be called a standard....
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 02:24 PM
26

It negatively impacts the world.around me thus impacting my life. Letting such toxic semiotics go unchallenged is a mistake.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/21 06:35 PM
52

As soon as she denies the existence of misandry, that tells you EVERYTHING you need to know. You know what the arguments will be and what the obvious gaping holes in them will be. The whole conversation is preprogrammed on her part. Brainless drone.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/21 02:27 AM
9

Politically non-Euclidian. I want a strong social safety net and strong environmental protections. I want the first, second, fourth, and tenth amendments to all be enforced. I'm a libertarian who doesn't hate poor people or clean air. Basically, the left have gone crazy and the right have always been evil, so I find myself unrepresented politically.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 01:28 PM
160

Reddit is explicitly misandrist. Men are allowed to be hated. As are white people. You see, every single male and every single white person is in a position of power over everyone else. Or so I've been told.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 12:22 PM
10

Don't fall forward the "no true Scotsman" bullehit. Feminism is what self-described feminists do.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/21 05:06 PM
2

T,hat last one is pretty painful.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:17 PM
1

I object any time the story is made subservient to a political agenda, especially when it's an adaptation from another artform, like comic book movies or books made into movies.
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/21 05:48 PM
4

They are terrified by male sexuality.
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/21 02:25 AM
3

Eh, this presupposes that "the Patriarchy" exists as an institution. And I don't buy it.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 01:33 PM
15

They are often explicitly dehumanizing. They will not accept that our subjective experience of living is as rich and valid as their own. They often assert thing like "men don't have sexual urges, they just want to dominate women" or "men aren't emotionally mature" or whatever. They are incapable of empathy or at least don't display it. They live their lives fearful of men and are cowardly in personal interactions. People with these ideas are not worthy of respect.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 09:40 AM
3

Yes, the fact that they think men have no valid issues is, in itself, a major issue. Just getting people to listen is virtually impossible: you are male, so axiomatically you and your opinions aren't worth as much as women's. You are not wrong. The shear lack of empathy from the supposedly more emotionally deft gender is continually astounding to me. It's classic dehumanization. They do not view you as having the right to have an opinion.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 09:25 AM
6

All I know is that if your psyche is soooooo fragile that my mere looking at you can cause distress, then you are not fit to associate with the adult world.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 04:06 AM
-2

No one is entitled to an opinion. The right to have one is predicated upon education about the subject and the general quality of the mind forming it. This woman does not have that right.
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/21 04:27 PM
5

I have no idea who those people are or what "bussed it down" means.
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/21 07:04 AM
2

You're here, you're queer, we're used to it, so shut up already.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/21 02:43 PM
3

I go OFF on people who use that word! Absolute trigger. I will not put up with sexist crap like that.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 02:05 AM
1

It's shit like this that makes it hard to respect some women. Men are more likely to be assaulted and have fewer safety resources. Yet she chooses to live in fear and I do not. She is weak and cowardly. What she describes isn't my privilege, but her rights. If she isn't getting her rights, then she's got a right to be pissed. But don't cast it as me having a privilege you lack.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 07:44 AM
2

They also start with their mouths and assholes being the same orifice. Most of us grow out of that, though.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/21 01:59 AM
3

Because hypocrisy is a virtue in progressive thought. Rules for thee not for me. They start with a presumption that no humans are created equal and think it's unjust. Thus they seek to "redress" those perceived imbalances. Pointing out their hypocrisy cuts directly at the heart of their worldview and they will always blow up at you for it.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 12:47 PM
9

Men are more likely to be victims of violence yet are expected to expose ourselves to it more (imagine the ribbing and disrespect you'd get if you took a safe ride home?). I think that women are not raised with an expectation of personal physical courage and thus many are weak and cowardly. If a woman is afraid of men, that speaks to her lack of character not men's lack of socialization.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 12:29 PM
1

You do not have my challenges and do not have the right to have an opinion on how I should tackle them. Take your own advice and STFU.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/21 12:58 PM
2

"How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?" "That's not funny!"
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 02:04 PM
2

what I object to is that the language presumes guilt before trial. Replace "victim" with "accuser" and I'd be a lot more sanguine to the ideas.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 03:40 PM
1

I don't particularly "like" feminism. You're either working for equality or you're sexist. If you're working for equality, probably best not to restrict yourself to one gender. That said, I am biologically incapable of digesting most vegetables and have a disease that requires me to eat bioavailable heme - red meat, that is. No, I will not be a vegan and your advocacy of veganism here is grossly inappropriate and unwelcome.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 03:00 PM
69

Depends on your definitions. I define feminism as what self-described feminists believe. No "no true Scotsman" arguments allowed. In that sense I'm fiercely anti-feminist. Now, if you are using feminism as a synonym for egalitarian, as some like to argue ("we just want eQuAliTy!"), then I'm fiercely pro-feminism.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 12:58 PM
3

I mean the following are facts. Men are more likely to be victims of violence. Men are are more likely to walk alone. We worry just as much as women do bout being attacked, we just have been trained to accept that we have to cope with that while women take campusrides and such. I mean men are trained from birth to value personal courage and display it at every opportunity. If we fail to live up to that standard we will be reviled with scorn. We are held to a much harder standard than any woman, …
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 04:13 AM
6

Because men are raised to value personal physical courage and women aren't.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 10:46 PM
23

It's crap like this that makes it hard to respect some women. Show some fucking personal courage, ladies! Men are more likely to be victims of violence and we're expected.to just suck it up, man up, and cope. Well, I have. And now I can't respect someone who refuses to.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 01:01 PM
28

What if instead of characterizing his post as being in regards to "all" feminists (something he never said, btw) and instead viewed it as being about most or even "many" feminists? Because I assure you, this response is in NO WAY unusual or unexpected. This is exactly the kind of argument we've all heard many times.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 12:59 PM
3

The thing that kills me about AITA is that 99% of the time the answer is a resounding "Yes! Of course you are! Read the title of your own post!"
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 08:50 PM
17

"Free Dinner Strategy"
/r/MensRights12/10/21 08:16 PM
1

Wait, so straight men and queer women are different?! Shocked! I am shocked, I say!
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 01:38 PM
10

Oh, honey, you already put yourself in that position.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 01:33 PM
8

It's.... right there I the word: "mis-" meaning "bad towards" and "gyno-" which means women. The word you're looking for is "misandry" and yes, many people think misandry is literally impossible. In their minds, all men are Oppressors and all women are Oppressed. Thus a woman can never be inappropriately negative towards men as she has no power. Don't look at me that way! They really think like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 01:33 PM
4

One of my all-time favorite quotes and I've thought about it on more than one occasion.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 06:09 PM
2

Not sure if it's what you're looking for, but many think the Boxer Rebellion had a lot to do with an imbalance of available men to women.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 07:17 PM
4

Wow. It would be difficult to engineer a post demonstrating more clearly how little she values men.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:15 PM
2

Just be ready to genderflip anything gender related and ask yourself "Is this appalling?" . If so, then the original probably is too. See "killallmen".
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:37 AM
4

I really wish people would start to understand that Fatherhood is not fungible. You can't just slot in a guy like he's replaceable machinery. That's part of it. Another important consideration is, if I am falling in love with soneone, I want and expect to be the most important person in her life and vice versa. If she has kids, that's impossible. You'll always come in second. I really don't think any of that makes me narcissistic.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 08:49 AM
1

There's a ton of thought and analysis on pre isely this subject. The subreddit that discussed it was banned. Be careful - you tred close to proscribed, heretical ground.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 05:01 PM
5

They are terrified of masculine sexuality. Anything that treats with it honestly will meet their disapproval.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:30 PM
5

When I first heard the phrase "the Power of the Male Gaze", all I could think was that if you're so threatened and s ared that you wilt from being looked at, you don't deserve to survive.
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/21 03:21 PM
3

"Feminine".
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:35 AM
5

My opinion: I don't have the right to control anyone else's language and they can call themself whatever pronouns they want. However, they don't have the right to control my language - when I use gendered words, I am referring to a biological distinction, most accurately defined as "what kind of gametes is your body set up to produce?" . Ru Paul is a man and the correct pronouns for me to use is "he/his".
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 07:23 AM
13

Anyone who doesn't tow the ideological line and declare that the future is female gets labeled an 'incel'. It's a hurtful word that links mens' value to sexual prowess and has little if any use.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:37 AM
64

"Punching up" is such a profoundly offensive concept. It presumes from the outset that peoples cone in strata; that there is a hierarchy of social status and that it is immutable in all circumstances. It's the kind of 'logic' that tells you if a homeless white guy is talking to Oprah Winfrey, he's the one with all the power.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:31 AM
7

No, not at all. We should emphasize the differences between our our societies. Perhaps some people will come to understand that the west is NOT a 'patriarchy'.
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/21 11:36 PM
6

Some people are so utterly terrified by masculine sexuality that they'll actually believe this blethers.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 07:07 AM
14

Banning subreddits is a terrible idea. Several were recently banned that had zero objectionable content simply by being painted with the broad brush of "incel". You want to get rid of incel opinions? Try listening to them and addressing their legitimate complaints. Sticking to pejorative labels will never help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 09:04 PM
9

"Unfortunately, many go down the shooter route". Can you support that statement?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 09:01 PM
1

It's not that men don't feel fear, it's that women aren't socialized to prize courage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 09:00 PM
6

Of course I support women's rights. It's women's wrongs that concern me.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:35 PM
3

Carefull. You're dangerously close to expressing a Forbidden Opinion(tm).
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/21 02:51 AM
4

It's a revolutionary idea to suggest that fatherhood has value.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:11 PM
1

It was the worst experience of my life and I'm still traumatized by it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 04:37 PM
9

When I was homeless, there were innumerable resources for women, providing housing, clothing, hygiene products, and other support. The was virtually nothing for me.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:59 PM
2

A perfectly cromulent Anglo-Saxon word dating back to the time of Shakespeare. It's definitely the equivalent term.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 05:17 PM
10

I call myself an egalitarian. I find one of the worst, most pernicious enemies of equality to be modern feminism. In that sense, I am an anti-feminist. But again, I prefer pro-equality. I feel the same way about most ideologies based on critical intersectionality theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/21 01:58 PM
2

I say pay the cost and be yourself, but that's lotn equation you can only balance for yourself. WARNING: This advice is dangerously close to Wrongthink(tm) and should not be construed as telling you to Go Your Own Way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/21 01:53 PM
28

Oh, I grasp it, I just disagree with your ideology. I am not in need of education. I understand your position, I just think it's god awful.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:38 AM
44

As long as it divides people by their immutable characteristics, it's a bullshit worldview that deserves ridicule.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:57 AM
10

Well said.
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/21 01:48 AM
5

Either they had the power to "fix that shit" and are responsible for their own repression, or we had the power and voluntarily distributed it. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:18 AM
9

God DAMMIT. That was one of the only places where you could bitch about true things. Fuck you, reddit.
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/21 01:24 AM
7

That was really well-written and interesting. I'm going to have to check out more of his stuff. He nails it here: when you can't even complain about t he problem without being villified, it becomes increasingly unlikely that the problem will be solved. The feminist response that "There is no problem" just demonstrates their shocking levels of callousness and lack of empathy. Not to mention self-awareness.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:36 AM
12

You are not too sensitive. All of those concepts are very problematic and should piss you off. The last time I heard the term 'mansplaining' I called her out. I asked her not to use such sexist lqanguage around me. When she started to push back, I said "Well if sexist neologisms are allowed, then I'm gonna pick 'cuntdescending sarcastabitch'. Does that work? Should I use that?". She didn't like that at all, but agreed to stop using the word. Couldn't get an apology from her though. That's always…
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/21 10:07 PM
13

It's stuff like this that has made me completely disengage from romance entirely. Go your own way.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 05:24 PM
4

They can apparently be traumatized by our mere gaze. That's about as small as it gets.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:44 PM
5

Many on the feminist trip can't admit to that. It's a core axiom of intersectionality theory that society is broken into groups of Oppressors and Oppressed with no gray or mixed areas. Men are in the former category, women, the later. To admit what you ask cuts at the deepest foundation of their core identities. You can't argue against axioms using logic. Logic is only useful for exploring the consequences of them. No, what we need is counter-propaganda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 04:27 PM
5

I have to wonder how many of those women knew how cruel they were being and how many were just unthinking in their lack of human decency.
/r/MGTOW01/08/21 03:38 PM
6

See, you're already painting me with too broad a brush. I didn't say I don't respect "women", I said "most women". And equality is not "the male cause". One can recognize the injustices against men without comment on those facing women. This is not a zerosum game. You should do so BECAUSE they are injustices. Because it's the right and ethical thing to do. Just like it was the right and ethical thing for men to give women the vote.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:56 AM
4

First of all, lose the religion. It's a complete nonsequitor. "Men" didn't invent those religions, a VERY VERY few men invented them. And women went along with them. Second, you have confused "hatred" with "lack of respect". For example, I can't respect someone without personal courage. This is not a characteristic traditionally nurtured in women. If you haven't been shot down romantically more than a few times, I can't begin to respect you - if you never ask someone out, you're pusilanimous. If…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:46 AM
3

Talk about "virtue signaling"!
/r/MensRights31/07/21 09:49 AM
2

There's actually a whole subset of wokism that violently objects to tolkein in specific and fantasy in general. By having racial characteristics at all (dwarves make stuff, orcs kills stuff, elves are snooty, etc) these works supposedly reinforce ideas of racial essentialism and such. Annd yes, they are successfully making inroads even into DnD. It's all nonsense.
/r/MGTOW31/07/21 06:09 AM
29

I suspect "sex doll" would have better grammar.
/r/MGTOW27/07/21 01:58 PM
10

Media piracy may be undesirable. It's certainly illegal. One thing it's not is "theft". When I steal something from you, I have it and you do not. If I download something, we both have it. Fundamentally different things.
/r/MGTOW27/07/21 01:42 PM
5

God damn that is some scary, infuriating shit right there. My heart is breaking. Free speech is one of the greatest contributions to the world America ever made and these idiots want to throw it away all because their ideas are so fragile they wilt and shrivel when exposed to sanity. I despair for our society.
/r/MGTOW27/07/21 05:36 AM
1

Now I'm triggered. What a hateful termagant! People like this would cheerfully commit gendercide given the opportunity. To hell with 'em.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/21 04:32 AM
2

I figure reddit keeps banning me for belonging to the wrong subreddit. I figure, eventually, all the subs that hate free speech will self-select out of my feed. When it gets reduced to r/aww and r/food, then I figure it'll be time to leave.
/r/MGTOW26/07/21 02:42 PM
1

Just remember that A+ is the participation trophy of the cert world. Hell, it was that years ago before they nerfed it. Do they still make you learn POST code beeps? And, as noted elsewhere, IT is not a 'good trade'. It's a never ending treadmill that you have to absolutely ADORE learning everything about computers, for free, on your own time if you want it to be a career.
/r/MGTOW26/07/21 05:52 AM
1

I suspect we have much more in common than we have differences. You will likely face many of the same challenges a born male will face and have aligned interests. Of course I'll support you. I might argue with you about pronouns and pheremones, but it'd be good natured and I'll be right there with you when you get shot down for being too short or poor or whatever else is fucking up your christmas.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/21 05:16 AM
14

The looks on the faces when you announce "Ok, it's your round. i'll have another of the same." is just... priceless. It's a damned good litmus test of whether she's a person worth talking to.
/r/MGTOW26/07/21 05:01 AM
5

I doubt I could repair a tire, but then I'm not a car guy. I sunk those points into computer skills, which I would say is an equivalently useful skillsuite.
/r/MGTOW26/07/21 04:12 AM
1

It's pretty clear that your only crime here is being a vile Man. And people like this wonder why we don't respect them.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/21 03:30 AM
4

Well, you've conflated libertarian with conservative. Your poll is fundamentally flawed. "Which ice cream do like best: vanilla, strawberry, or chocolate-dogshit swirl?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/21 05:23 PM
47

When I was homeless, there very virtually no resources for me to draw upon. I saw plenty of women gain shelter, transport, counseling, clothing, hygiene products, and social support. It really drove home that society places absolutely zero value on me and plenty on women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/21 04:24 PM
5

Because when you stop caring about them you stop receiving them unless you do something spectacularly worthwhile on your own. Without them, life can become EXTREMELY difficult. I know, having given up both.
/r/MGTOW25/07/21 04:20 PM
1

Yeah, you're in for a treat.
/r/MGTOW24/07/21 05:12 PM
1

Gor's a little... extreme for my taste. Some of its fans take it waaaaaay too seriously. If you really want a good MGTOW adventure series of that era, I'd go with the Destroyer/Remo Williams books.
/r/MGTOW24/07/21 04:46 PM
13

Well, what do you expect? Much of reddit is very 'woke' now and woke = cowardice. They cannot abide honest disagreement with their ideas. They take their positions as axioms, thus if you aren't in line ideologically you necessarily at best need to be 'educated' on the topic, or you're mad, or you're evil, or all three.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/21 03:24 PM
2

Black Heimdall is the one that really kills me. Heimdall's sobriquet is "The Whitest of the White Gods". Idris Alba is one of my favorite actors, but he's definitely not the whitest of the white anything! And you forgot Black Shocker...
/r/MGTOW24/07/21 03:16 PM
16

There's a reason why what used to be 'Personnel ' is now 'Human Resources'. It's evil and it causes others to do evil.
/r/MGTOW24/07/21 02:48 PM
4

Long term psychological health. I am a lot happier and healthier when I stick to my moral core and a lot more miserable when I don't. Plus there's the whole mathematical interpretation of karma: when you treat the people around you like crap, you'll find yourself surrounded by people you've treated like crap. Plus there's the whole "improving the world improves your world" angle. Therefore, it is in my own self-interest to be a decent human being.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 03:55 AM
4

Men are "afraid of commitment" because we're the ones who commit. We're much more likely to put our whole heart on the line.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 03:50 AM
7

Well, yeah. It's a lot easier to be a terrible person.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 03:34 AM
5

Eh, I always object when people use "Well, life isn't fair" as an excuse for shitty behaviour. It is our moral obligation to make it fair. We are the part of the universe that is conscious. We are the part of the world that can judge and act accordingly. There's no justice - there's just us. And anytime you don't strive for what is right you are abrogating the responsibilities inherent in the possession of a mind. Recognizing that others don't see this doesn't free you from those responsibilties…
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 03:29 AM
6

"I've always wondered how you write such realistic women characters..." " it's simple: I start with a man then remove all sense and accountability. ". Stuff like this always makes me think of that quote.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 03:13 AM
10

Women make stupid purchasing decisions then blame men for it. This is normal. Ladies, it's not our fault you don't have pockets.
/r/MGTOW22/07/21 05:26 PM
2

I consider myself quite progressive. But I hold as a core principle that "It is WRONG to treat people differently because of their race, gender, r other immutable characteristics" . This puts me firmly at odds with both the left and the Klan. I'm pretty sure that means I'm on the right side. It breaks my heart to see all these peoplr who espouse values I hold dear acting against their stated interests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/21 05:23 PM
1

Welcome to the club! Here's your keychain with a hundred mystery keys, your rolled -up magazine for spidersmushing, and a man card. Get 10 punches on that and you get a free hug! Seriously, thou, I'm sorry you're facing such things. I'm also sorry the rest us are as well.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 04:44 PM
5

You're demanding intellectual rigor from an inherently incoherent position. Remember, when you're dealing with ideologues, consonance with ideology is the only thing that matters. Their creed is accepted as an axiom and any argument against it is automatically seen as evidence that you're crazy, evil, or uneducated (mad, bad, and dumb). Honest educated differing opinions are a.nonsensical proposition from the get go.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 05:46 AM
7

Either they had the power and couldn't be forced or they didn't have the power and everyone can shut up. No. Civil rights were demanded, but not taken. They were given.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 05:40 AM
10

Once again, women using "cowardice" as though it were an excuse. "I wAs pReSuReD! I didn't have the courage to say 'No'!" Well, that's _ your_ fault! It's not my responsibility to protect you from your own lack of character.
/r/MGTOW20/07/21 12:44 AM
10

I don't believe in the patriarchy so the thought never occurred to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 12:23 AM
1

She probably sees herself as having lower social status because she does.
/r/MGTOW19/07/21 05:39 AM
10

When I was homeless, the disparity between the value society puts on me vs. Some Woman was never more apparent. No shelters for men. Tons of programs to help women. Hell, even the NAME of WIC is sexist.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 10:45 PM
-4

Mathematics is exactly the opposite of predictable. The only way to predict an outcome is to perform the operation.
/r/MGTOW18/07/21 07:49 PM
10

I can't speak for other people here, but I would welcome feminist voices to engage with. They aren't interested in healthy debate, though. They favor Manicheanism: if you don't agree with them already, you are evil and/or ignorant and don't deserve to have a voice. Almost everyone on the critical intersectionality trip falls into the same trap. It's the same way the Nazi's condemned "Jewish science" or the USSR's Lysenkpism. The truth value of a statement is not relevant - only its degree of acc…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 05:53 PM
6

It doesn't really matter what kind of language you use: they find our ideas offensive. However we choose to express ourselves on these points, we will be villified. However, that does make it a lot eqsier to ignore those voices: any message that is 100% predictable is 100% ignorable.
/r/MGTOW18/07/21 05:39 PM
112

Imagine "I miss the times .hen women would shut up and obey"?
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 05:29 PM
4

Just remember that you can do everything right and still fail.
/r/MGTOW16/07/21 04:24 AM
5

Eh, lack of hygiene access for the homeless is a real problem. When I was homeless, I was lucky in that a local center offered showers for a dollar deposit. If I'd been a woman, I would've been in a world of hurt when it came to period products. Y'see, you can control some things when you're homeless: the way you treat others, how you spend your time, how much you impact the world around you. But there are things you can't conteol: you will occupy space and need a place to physically exist withp…
/r/MGTOW16/07/21 03:44 AM
11

Because women are the victim in every interaction with men. If they weren't, why, the entire working ideology of modern feminism would fall apart like a hypocritical pile of dross and we can't have that. We're dealing with axioms, here, people.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/21 03:34 AM
3

I was definitely thinking that they went to that particular well a few too many times.
/r/MGTOW16/07/21 03:01 AM
56

I think it's wrong to treat someone differently because of their race, gender, or orientation. I never expected to see the day where that was a monumentally contentious position requiring a controvesial law to uphold it in education.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:49 AM
85

Stop talking once in a while
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 01:35 PM
10

"How is this fair"? What, expecting you to provide as much to the relationship as the guy? Gee, that's a toughie...
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/21 02:52 PM
5

They permabanned you for THAT and they us "fragile"?! Their ideas are so flimsy they wilt or shatter when confronted with with even the most mild rebuke.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 06:22 PM
3

I get it, I'm just saying I don't like and am suggesting you may not like it either, on reflection.
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/21 04:39 PM
1

You will receive suxh pushback when you merely hint that fathers have value. All the single mothers need to believe that Fathers are Fungibke. That they don't matter much and can be trivially replaced or ignored.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 02:05 PM
-6

Man, don't say "cucked". That's like... I dunno... making fun of a guy's weiner size. It's gross and plays to all the crap women do.
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/21 02:00 PM
11

"MiSaNdRy DoEsN't ExISt, ThO!"
/r/MGTOW16/06/21 01:43 PM
1

It's a dialect designed to make one be underestimated. Unfortunately, that's directly opposed to being respected.
/r/MGTOW15/06/21 02:31 PM
14

God, written AAVE always makes people sound like an idiot. A shame, since he's right.
/r/MGTOW15/06/21 07:39 AM
199

Ladies, y'all have to try harder than "I'm pretty". The middle eastern women in my DMs have promised to cook, clean, and be a faithful helpmeet.
/r/MGTOW15/06/21 05:57 AM
2

And that's a BIG part of why I find it hard to respect women collectively: no tradition of personal courage. It's considered perfectly fine for women to be cowards. Whenever I hear women talk about being afraid when walking alone or whatever, I always think "Man up! How you deal with fear is highly revealing of character".
/r/MGTOW15/06/21 02:07 AM
51

Never trust anyone who casually use absolutes like 'every' and 'all'. They are either a liar,, a fool, or both.
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/21 11:52 AM
13

There are two genders. They are defined by what kind of gametes your body produces or is evolved to produce. No one has the right to unilateral self-definition. And the fact that this person prefers the wrong pronouns does not obligate me to use them. They are rude as hell for demanding that I do.
/r/MGTOW01/06/21 11:13 AM
6

In my experience, women create emotional labor then spend hours talking about it.
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/21 11:05 AM
3

Appreciate the sentiment.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 02:48 PM
5

You know you're dealing with something particularly vacuous and vile when it becomes impossible to parody.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 07:44 PM
11

And of course,since technology made the song's distribution possibrl, the degree to which it is persuasive is the precise degree to which it proves its contentions false.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 02:53 PM
13

Feminism IS what feminist DO, not some denotation in a textbook. If someone doesn't hate men but wants equality, they are by definition an egalitarian. Hating men is a BIG part of feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 03:54 AM
8

....she said on the Internet, a mostly male invention.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/21 11:10 AM
1

Yeah, that's all sensible. My darker side says "So what? Nothing has changed and no one's opinion is different."
/r/MensRights15/04/21 08:21 AM
3

I don't hate women. I hate sexists. That includes many self-identified "feminists".
/r/MGTOW15/04/21 03:24 AM
5

Have you ever run into anti-education bias from other black people? I've read that it's common for black men to be denigrated as effeminate if they do well in school. How real is that and how much is bullshit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 02:44 AM
14

....and then they ban you for posting in the wrong group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/21 02:42 AM
8

God. That kinda crap just makes me nauseous. They are such pusilanimous cowards! Not banning you for what you said there, not banning you for what you said elsewhere, but banning you because you said anything in the wrong context. Monstrous.
/r/MGTOW14/04/21 09:33 PM
8

She doesn't even see men as human anymore, does she? That level of lack of empathy is sociopathic.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/21 02:26 PM
15

Feh. "Thank a feminist". Horseshit! Thank a White Man. Women didn't "achieve" voting equality; we chose to give it to them. Every group that complains about history must confront the fact that it was guys, mostly white, who built the world and gave them political power.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:44 AM
8

Man, I'm sorry you felt the need to respond to such garbage.
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 08:12 PM
1

It says right there why he was banned: simply being a member of a community to which they object.
/r/MGTOW11/04/21 04:22 PM
1

I like the mirror.
/r/MGTOW11/04/21 03:46 PM
2

But it might help a guy reading it there or here.
/r/MGTOW11/04/21 03:43 PM
8

You are coming from a place of curiosity and honest inquiry. They are coming from a place of ideology. You need to accept their precepts before you can even begin to have a conversation. One of the basic tenets of their philosophy is that when it comes to sex, women have ALL the rights and men have ALL the responsibility. Once you accept that, then yes, he's a rapist. If, however, you expect accountability in equal portion from the woman for her actions, then the only unethical actor was the wom…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 01:00 AM
16

I know you mean well, but you're actively ignoring the real social costs men would pay if they took your advice.
/r/AntiFeminists08/04/21 11:17 AM
5

I think it's time people start talking about "toxicity" and not "toxic whateverism".
/r/MensRights07/04/21 07:21 PM
1

Right there with you, pal. We all know someone who voted for hillary solely because of her gender. We've all heard "always believe the victim" conveniently elliding that the correct term is "accuser" until the trial is done. Women always get the benefit of the doubt. Well, I'm done with that. I will always believe the accused until proven otherwise. I will always assume that claims of sexism are wrong, lies, or both. I may never get laid again, but if that's the price I pay for dealing with this…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 08:46 PM
3

Any ideology-based worldview cannot abide reality-based criticism. You must accept the axioms of the ideology first before you're even allowed to have a conversation. Look at the Nazi banning of "Jewish science" or Lysenkoism. No, reality-based arguments are guaranteed to provoke anger and rebuke.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/21 03:42 PM
1

Eh, I'd say most monogamous couples probably don't have a strong opinion on the subject - It's just not the sort of thing they think about often. It's a subject prone to confirmation bias.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/21 06:41 AM
3

Well, half of marraiges end in divorce. It turns out monogamy isn't something humans are very good at.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/21 04:00 AM
4

The stats I've read say 55% of husbands and 50% of wives admit to cheating. So, it's about equal.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/21 02:03 PM
23

It's nowhere near a "white" thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/21 05:57 AM
5

"How do you write such compelling female characters?" "It's simple: I start with a man, then remove all sense and accountability."
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 05:34 AM
33

I think you're confusing Gen X and Boomers.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 05:32 AM
6

So was a lot of things. De jure and de facto aren't always consonant. We have to wait and see what happens in the courts and how the colleges respond to that.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 10:22 PM
1

See, we've got life skills and had sane definitions for feminine and masculine, so we don't need to complain. We still like to sure, but we don't need to. Whatever.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/21 10:10 PM
5

Been there. Or when you're walking behind a gal and have to deliberately slow your steps so as to fall back and not freak her out. Terrible feeling all around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 09:54 PM
2

Not one mention of misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 09:27 PM
5

The fact that she won't take the test is very strong evidence that she needs to.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 03:27 AM
19

It's Chinatown, Jake.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 03:01 AM
23

I'm not a misogynist but people like this make me understand them a little.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/21 09:26 AM
14

Start by talking to the teacher privately. Tell her you feel threatend and denigrated by such statements. That when someone says something about "all men" or men in general that they are talking about you, not some abstraction "out there". You, personally. When they say kill all men, they are advocating your murder. when they say men are scum, they are disrespecting you without cause. Tell the teacher that you intend on sending a letter to this effect to the principal and the school board. Regar…
/r/MensRights11/02/21 09:20 AM
10

And women wonder why so many men think women just aren't worth it.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/21 08:51 AM
2

Well done all around!
/r/MensRights10/02/21 06:23 PM
5

God, am I sick and tired of having masculine sexuality demonized.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 01:31 PM
1

Her voice has the euphony of a garbage disposal and the gravitas of Fran Drescher. Her ideas are even worse. Scum.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/21 01:01 PM
2

I think it's wrong to treat someone differently just for belonging to a group they had no choice about. Race, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, whatever. It's just wrong and dehumanizing - it reduces people. Whether you're a white guy who refuses to hire minorities, a black guy who brags of "Jewing that arab down" at a convenience store, or a fourth-wave feminist saying men should be assumed guilty of [whatever] just because of their sex, you're refusing to deal with whole people. I am st…
/r/MensRights07/02/21 06:37 AM
30

Your attitude here is exactly the problem. He wasn't talking about women. He was talking about men. That is the subject. There is no reason to bring up women's issues at all. They aren't relevant to the conversation. But you've taken "talking about something other than women's issues" and read it as "mysoginy". It's exactly the same logic as people who say you need to be "anti-racist" and actively fighting against racism or you ARE a racist. Men are allowed to focus on their own issues without n…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 04:57 PM
10

Your experiences with men have been overwhelmingly neutral. Most of them just go about their day and don't think about you. If you take a few bad actors as representative, then yes, you're a bigot.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 06:02 AM
7

A marriage is many things, but one of the least discussed, most important, thing it is is a business partnership. The two of you have to work together to create a life a big part of that is economic. If you can't respect a partner who isn't materially committed to that partnership, it's an immediate red flag. You are not the asshole.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/21 10:19 AM
2

If your ideas need a safe space in order to thrive, they're bad ideas.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/21 01:58 AM
1

I can't speak to the larger issues of societal change. What I can say is that the tenth isn't a viable route to achievement of such.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 02:58 PM
1

No. That's not reasonably going to happen. Just accept as an axiom that the Tenth is only used to help the rich and powerful.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 02:50 PM
1

The tenth amendment is pretty much universally ignored. It is only ever upheld as reasonable when it applies to the federal government and gives them power to regulate. Any individual advocating for a right or for change on the basis of the 10th Ammendment is going to be sorely disappointed. It only applies when it gives rich people more money.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 02:19 PM
0

Your link is no good.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/21 07:58 AM
3

In any accusation of racism, sexism, or any other kind of discrimination, I always assume that the accuser is either lying or wrong. Between what I've seen online and experienced in person, it's the only sensible attitude. I'm willing to listen to evidence, but the raising of an accusation leads me to suspect the accuser of wrongdoing. That's terrible! Just monstrous. But it's true: the accusers have squandered their credibility over the past two decades.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/21 02:20 AM
2

Lost all credibility when she mentioned the 10th Ammendment. As if that still applies anywhere!
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:38 AM
1

No knock on you or Mr. Depp, just this specific video. More power to him, though.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:09 AM
0

Oh my god this guy is intolerable. Between the accent and the "I'm gonna read legalese at you" attitude I couldn't get past 3 minutes of this joker.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:05 AM
4

I think it's important in any discussion of "privilege" to be mindful of avoiding the trap of thinking about it like scales; like you're weighing the privilege of one group vs. that of another's . They don't cancel out. There's no pendulum swinging one way then the other. Instead, you have to think about the specifics of each situation. What factors arw helping this person in this case.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 10:22 PM
5

It all comes down to if treat people like they are individuals or if you treat them like a synecdoche of whatever group they belong to. A long as you insist on considering specific 1-to-1 interactions, they will always lose. It's only when you let them treat you like you have the power of the richest men that they feel like they have a point.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 05:37 PM
2

She really goes to the mat on the whole "it has to be institutional!" lie, but never onvpce supports that contention in any way. She just say "This is so" without any evidence or reasoning or even academic citations. what a piece of trash.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 01:17 PM
2

Damn, that's procrustean! "Do you think think all male CEOs should immediately quit their jobs in favor of the better sex or do you support chattel slavery for your multiple wives?" Christ.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/21 03:32 AM
4

"I just did it to survive. " She acts like that absolves her of all responsibility. I wonder if she can even spell the word 'ethics'. It's the perfect synecdoche for the "I gots to gets mine" attitude that is so prevalent these days, that is functionally equivalent to an explicit rejection of civilization. Barbarians.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/21 03:23 AM
14

Fifth column.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 08:32 PM
25

OUT. STANDING.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/21 01:18 AM
5

I think you'll find us generally welcoming, but don't be surprised if some folks disagree with your definition of gender. You're still going to be welcome, but many will not accept you as male. Luckily, that doesn't have much to do with the broader purview of the sub and we want to hear your perspective.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:06 PM
18

Thanks for the link. That was a happy-maker.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 07:25 AM
2

That's the long and the short of it. No woman can be sexist towards men. No black person can be racist towards whites, jews, and asians (which are the most common forms of racism I've seen in african-americans). It makes me want to puke it's so fucking unjust.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:31 PM
2

It comes from Critical Race/Gender Theory which has been quickly dominating academia for the last couple of decades.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 04:12 PM
25

The later, obviously, is the preferred outcome.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:18 AM
1

It's an axiom of Critical Theory that a member of the "oppressed" class can't be racist/ sexist/whatever to a member of the "oppressing" class. Racism is "prejudice plus power" to them. And membership in that class means that by their lights you automatically have power and they don't. By the definitions she's been taught, black people literally cannot be racist. You were working from different definitions.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 04:12 PM
2

"Mansplaining" is a word that definitely triggers me. The last time I heard it in person I called the lady out on it. Asked her not to use such gross sexist terminology. Shhe pushed back in righteous indignation so I said, "Fine if we're allowed to use sexist portmanteus, then I really don't want to be talking to a cuntdescending sarcastabitch." and walked away. She was truly flabbergasted. Neever heard her use that word around me again, though.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 04:07 PM
7

I recently posted in a feminist sub, saying that I agree with a post even though I'm MRA. Sympathizing post get downvoted to oblivion and they call me racists and a terrorist. They are insane.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:18 AM
3

Try posting on a feminist sub sometime. Even when sympathizing with them, you'll be downvoted to oblivion. And yes, it feels awful.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:04 AM
2

Unless you're different in the wrong way.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 12:01 PM
9

You're right that I didn't look up the wikipedia entry. I have however heard each of the above described as toxic in conversation. And my example answer "Nothing" is literally a quote of three different people I've talked to about the subject.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 11:38 AM
9

You might want to rethink the word "tainted". If that's not who you want to be, by all means - try to change. But some of us don't view traditional masculine values to be negative. Just think of a gal who wants to be a housewife and mom. Does she deserve ridicule? Now ask, does a man who desires such a woman deserve ridicule? I'm not bagging on you, just pointing out that there's a lot of baggage on the word that might not be warranted.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 11:36 AM
25

Eh, what it really means is "Masculinity I disapprove of".
/r/MensRights26/09/20 11:16 AM
1

Oh, THERE'S a phrase I've never heard and wish I still hadn't. I've always likened the reverse to dealing with "emotional bureaucracy" .
/r/MensRights26/09/20 09:54 AM
5

Found lacking by women. It's not unreasonable to call them "wrong".
/r/MensRights26/09/20 09:52 AM
252

The Myth of Toxic Masculinity is pernicious. Just about any person who uses the phrase seems to conflate all masculinity with it. Seriously, try asking them to define non-toxic masculinity with positive statements - what traits are common to masculinity that aren't toxic? "Nothing" is the preferred answer.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 06:55 AM
5

She is a despicable coward. He is rational. why the difference? Because she didn't even think about dealing with the problem herself.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 07:12 AM
3

Careful! You might be giving away the game. Best not use the "C" word in public.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 12:51 PM
7

Yes, American schools are largely funded by local property taxes and yes it leads to exactly the problems you'd expect.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 12:25 PM
1

That's all great (though I think you might have internalized a bit to much androphobic bullshit) and argues for men to be supportive. My question was specifically about the claim that we all deserve to feel handsome. I don't understand that claim and no one seems willing to address it.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 11:47 AM
5

"Dune" is largely about a young man trying to avoid systematic abuse at the hands on a female secret society.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:14 AM
0

I know many of both. Though few reenactors. What's your point? And I still don't have an answer....
/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:57 AM
2

You still didn't answer my question. Why do we deserve to feel that way if we aren't that way? You're talking about HOW to feel that way. I'm asking WHY delude myself? Why feel deserving why you aren't? I suspect this is a generational thing. I'm not a millennial and have only seen this kind of attitude ( "Everyone deserves to win even if they lost") only there.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 01:14 AM
8

Why do we all deserve to feel handsome? I'm not and never will be.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:53 PM
3

Wow! Great interview.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:22 PM
5

Yeah. We can't fall into the "no true Scotsman" trap - anyone who calls themself an MRA is someone you need to count as part of the movement, no matter how odious.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:29 PM
-6

Man, I agree with what you are saying, but I really wish you'd learn to use an apostrophe when appropriate. You're making the rest of us look bad.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:16 PM
-3

Good luck. Expect to be penalized on your grades for this.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:23 PM
2

Good god that's infuriating. I'd be yelling at her right off the bat if I saw that, threatening to call the cops. It is NOT ok to put up with violence.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:28 AM
8

My thoughts exactly. Mainstream news saying what's obvious, true, and taboo. Bra-fucking-vo, Mr. Journalist!
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:04 AM
2

Good god, this is sickening. This sort of thinking is so insidious and evil. It's the same thought processes that gave us the HUAAC Red Scare of the 50's or the witch trial frenzies of colonial America. As soon as you start thinking in groups of Us and Them, it's a REAL short slide to thinking about "Normal People" and "Everyone else". After that, it's inevitable to slip into "People" and "Others". Welcome to being "Othered". They don't believe in equality, they believe in dominance, or so their…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:58 PM
7

Worse: I get rights and you don't.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:45 PM
0

Uh huh. And I'm sure the professional consequences of not towing the line has nothing to do with it - it's all about what they really feel.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:41 PM
-1

Maybe you're ethically correct, but practically, you're waaaaay off base. All you can do if you are male and assaulted is start screaming "Help! Help! Call the cops! Help! She's attacking me!", do nothing but dodge, run, and guard (NOT blocks per se - those could bruise her arms and then you're dead), and dial 911 if you can. And even then you'll probably be the one arrested, but you'll be well placed for pressing charges afterwards. They know they are immune from any consequences. A woman attac…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:38 PM
11

True, but how they react when presented with those facts, and how the group responds to their reaction, are quite relevant.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:16 PM
2

Very firmly equality based. I thnk it's wrong to treat people differently based upon their gender, race, or sexual orientation. So yes, I'm against presumed agressor laws and affirmative action. (Though, I'm also against shitty racist HMOs and a lot of the real clueless antiwoman bullshit I've seen in IT.) I think people should be treated equally, while recognizing that they often aren't, when trying to figure out how to treat them.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:05 AM
-9

I can certainly see where you're coming from, but I think there might be a thing or two worth considering... You talk about someone 'willfully' joining ISIS... what do you mean by that? Doesn't that imply an informed consent, somewhere along the way? If a person has been explicitly forbidden from getting a decent education, isn't the proper response 'pity' rather than 'outrage'? I mean, there're tons of messed up things about Western gender politics (but it seems like they pale in comparison to …
/r/MensRights01/03/15 10:38 AM
21

I read Cracked daily for years. I was a thorough fan who never missed an article. After they went all white knight last year I stopped reading them entirely. It was incredibly sad and upsetting, but I just couldn't stay in a place where not only was I not welcome, but one where disagreement is considered a foul offense against society. And I think you underestimate the amount of motivation that comes from 1) honest analysis, 2) raw commercialism (like politicians, there's a big chunk of playing …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 10:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter