TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stupefyingly Archive

View 1 posts and 126 comments by stupefyingly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Blue Pill Examplestupefyingly/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 07:05 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Try this mirror.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 01:25 PM
-1

You desperately need new catchphrases across all your alts. I am reporting them all. You're done for.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:00 PM
-3

I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 09:33 PM
-6

I haven't seen a single piece scientific evidence, simply unqualified people spouting off bullshit. How about a medical textbook or a scientific paper? OP will surely deliver. Until then, OP is a loose whore and a shitty faggot.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 09:22 PM
-2

Loose whores are called loose because they are literally loose. Why else would they be called loose? You must personally be a loose whore and butthurt over getting called out. Get over it. P.S. SRS cunts like you are obsessed with shit and assholes because you get fucked up the ass all the time like the fucking faggots that you are, which loosens up your assholes and makes you incontinent (shitty).
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 09:03 PM
-5

The slang is not modern. It has centuries of history and was developed to describe a real-world phenomenon. Why are you choosing to ignore the looseness of whores? Do you know how whorish you seem right now?
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 08:26 PM
-2

Urban Dictionary is a citation for slang. The slang usage exists because the phenomenon of loose whores exists. If the phenomenon didn't exist, it wouldn't be necessary to name it.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 07:23 PM
-2

You were supposed to explain your claim that lots of sex loosens the vaginal muscles. It does, which is why the term "loose whore" exists. Read the definitions. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 06:36 PM
-1

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1d84fl/used_cars_vs_sluts/c9pfyy6
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 05:37 AM
-2

It's the internet's primary source on slang definitions. Where else are you going to get a definition on loose whore?
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 05:26 AM
-6

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1d84fl/used_cars_vs_sluts/c9p42n3
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 05:15 AM
-4

Loose whore means a whore whose vagina has been loosened by sexual activities. Read the definitions. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 05:05 AM
-5

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Loose Note definitions 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 21, 25, 30, 37. Still waiting on yours.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 04:54 AM
-6

No, it's limited to loose whores and that's it. (Hence the name.)
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 04:44 AM
-5

Congratulations, you just failed high school physics.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 04:32 AM
-9

Sorry, vaginal loosening is not limited to females who experience tearing during childbirth. Therefore, that cannot be the reason. Try harder.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 03:45 AM
-9

Your inflammatory rhetoric does not substitute for an actual answer. I take your continued inability to answer the question to be your concession and accept it.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 02:51 AM
-8

Your inability to answer the question exposes you as more stupid.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 02:25 AM
-6

Which one? That's the whole point. If you could have answered that question until now -- if you could have provided a legitimate citation proving your claim -- the argument would have been resolved in your favor. But you can't, and so you lose. I accept your concession. We're done here.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 02:13 AM
-10

Oh, yes, we're done. There's no "we" without "me". Enjoy feeding your own unsubstantiated bullshit to yourself, "Dr." Phoney.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 02:02 AM
-8

Stephen Hawking is college educated, too. He's highly qualified -- in physics. Doesn't mean he can run a marathon. Qualification is field-dependent. None of the people you cited are qualified in medicine. You're full of shit. We're done here.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:47 AM
-5

Good point on velocity, but no, I meant mass and size. (Mass and volume), (density and volume) and (mass and density) are all informationally equivalent, anyway. Given any set of two figures, you can calculate all three figures. Cheers!
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:17 AM
-10

The professional title of therapist is unregulated by the government. Anyone can call themselves a therapist and it requires no academic or professional qualification whatsoever. That's why it's completely and utterly meaningless. You have to look at the actual academic credentials of anyone calling themselves a therapist, and in this case, they do not qualify the people in question to speak authoritatively on vaginal anatomy. Thanks for playing.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:05 AM
-15

Sorry, that use does not exist. Citation needed.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 11:10 PM
-7

You've conceded through your failure to prove your point and your insistence that the other side must prove your point. That is complete and utter bullshit. We're done here.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 09:08 PM
-45

"Loose morals" itself comes from "loose vagina". Do you ever hear men referred to as having loose morals? Ever wonder why not? Exactly.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:08 PM
-9

Yes, you have. You had a chance to provide valid citations and you blew it. Now you're telling me that finding support for your claim is my responsibility. No. It was your responsibility and you have failed. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 07:47 PM
-15

Everyone is qualified at something or other. These people are qualified at their specialties, but none of those specialties has anything to do with vaginal anatomy. These people are no more qualified at speaking to vaginal anatomy than Stephen Hawking is qualified at running a marathon. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 07:03 PM
-14

Michael Castleman is not a medical doctor. He has an M.A. in journalism. Melysa Martinez is not a medical doctor. She has a B.A. in communications. Her article quotes Dr. Ava Cadell, who is not a medical doctor, either. Her training is in human behavior and education. While her use of the Dr. prefix is not technically fradulent (she has two Ph.D.s) it is highly misleading because it usually indicates medical doctorship in day-to-day use. Either way, she is certainly not qualified to speak on vag…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 03:29 PM
-38

cite please
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 04:30 AM
0

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8237298/What-women-really-want-to-marry-a-rich-man.html
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 04:14 AM
-15

Let's get back to the actual point of this argument. You were supposed to deliver a citation showing that sexual activity cannot loosen vaginas. You failed. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 04:03 AM
-14

That's not what that paragraph says.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 03:51 AM
-17

Sorry, you had one chance and you blew it. We're done here.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 12:23 AM
-17

I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 11:59 PM
-10

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1d84fl/used_cars_vs_sluts/c9oi5wx
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 10:35 PM
-14

Exactly! Vaginas aren't sentient, and therefore can't know what is supposed to make them loose vs. what isn't. Therefore, everything that goes in a vagina makes a woman loose -- hence the expression "loose woman"!
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 10:14 PM
-19

You combined your continued inability to answer the question with ad hominem. So you lost the argument twice. We're done here.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 10:03 PM
-16

That paragraph does not answer the question of why there are urinary problems after childbirth.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 09:43 PM
-16

I consider your inability to answer the question to be your concession and accept it.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 09:31 PM
-18

I said things that disprove your un-logic. You can't seem to respond to any of it. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 09:20 PM
-22

Some paper airplanes are much bigger and heavier than bricks. http://www.gizmag.com/great-paper-airplane-project/21961/ Thank you for proving my point. Besides, everything that hits you will hurt you. Mass and size are only some of the factors. Velocity and direction are other factors. These are analogous to how hard and deep the whore is getting fucked. These tend to be significant factors in the loosening up of whore vaginas.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 09:06 PM
-22

Sorry, vaginas aren't sentient. They don't know what's straining them and so they can't react differently. They'll loosen up in reaction to whatever strains them, be it a baby, a cock, a dildo, a beer bottle, or a hamster -- different amounts depending on the size and the frequency of the strain, but loosen up all the same. You must be a loose whore since you're so butthurt by the facts. Can't help you there.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:51 PM
-27

Depends on the infant, the penis, the dildo, and the beer bottle. Sizes vary. Also, a childbirth lasts a very short while compared to all the sex a whore or a slut has. They're called loose women for a reason. Their cunts are literally loose.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:27 PM
-34

Answer my question.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:24 PM
-8

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1d84fl/used_cars_vs_sluts/c9og6p9
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:22 PM
-36

Why are there urinary problems after childbirth?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:21 PM
-32

What's special about the strain from childbirth? How does the vagina know that what's straining it is a baby, and not a cock, or a dildo, or a beer bottle? Is it sentient?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:19 PM
-35

You have no idea why Kegels were invented.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:18 PM
-1

The citation is legitimate. You're free to independently confirm it. Your tone argument is a logical fallacy. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 08:07 PM
-2

I just provided you relevant information that debunks the bullshit you're trying to spew here. That's the most valuable kind of learning you can do -- learning that corrects previously believed falsehoods. Take advantage of it.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:59 PM
-14

OP will surely deliver. P.S. Try spelling Kegel correctly first.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:57 PM
-1

Without any additional information, every child of a married couple in the US must assume a 50% probability of not being from the husband, per the results of the cited study. However, additional information can be integrated to estimate more accurate probabilities in each specific case. It doesn't sound like you know much about calculating probabilities.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:56 PM
-2

We're done here.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:51 PM
-4

That's a possibility for anyone, but knowing my mother, I doubt it.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:50 PM
-2

when was the last time you saw any male try to extract an unfair amount of economic resources from a female in exchange for providing sex? Show me a pattern of alpha males consistently doing this. But you can't, can you? I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:45 PM
-67

If what I stated about vaginas is false -- if strain does not loosen up the vagina -- then why were Kegels invented? That's right, walk away.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:44 PM
-2

A surprising amount do. Robin Baker's Sperm Wars cites a study that found that 1 out of 2 babies born to married couples in the US and 1 out of 3 babies born to married couples in Europe was genetically unrelated to the husband. These are just married couples with babies. One can only imagine what goes on in more casual relationships.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:40 PM
-2

Artificial scarcity refers to oligopolically limiting the supply of something that isn't actually limited, in an effort to unfairly raise its price. In this context, it involves limiting the supply of sex. Males do not limit the supply of sex, and they don't charge a price for it, unfair or otherwise. when was the last time you saw any male try to extract an unfair amount of economic resources from a female in exchange for providing sex? I consider your inability to answer this question to be yo…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:37 PM
-2

Females are shamed against providing sex easily to anyone, and rewarded with the promise of leeching off of their male partners if they can limit themselves to monogamy (or do a good enough impression). This is why even whores and sluts will pair bond with beta males and leech off of them while secretly fucking around behind them. The easy income is too sweet to resist.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:35 PM
-1

No. Men have no sexual oligopoly among them, alpha males included. Besides, when was the last time you saw any male try to extract an unfair amount of economic resources from a female in exchange for providing sex? That's an essential feature of the female sexual oligopoly, and its reverse simply doesn't exist.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:31 PM
-2

It's no joke. Females are operant conditioned by society to fulfill their sexual roles. You can't argue this point, anyway. There's nothing to argue. It's just fact.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:29 PM
-1

I'm not merely saying it. It is the case.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:21 PM
-63

Kegels are useful for tightening up any loosened vagina. Any strain on the vagina will loosen it, including frequent, numerous, big cocks -- hence the term "loose woman".
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:20 PM
-3

You don't know what operant conditioning means? Then go look it up. It is not my job to educate you.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:18 PM
-3

It's called artificial scarcity. All it needs is an oligopolical collusion among all the providers. De Beers does it with diamonds. Women do it with sex.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 07:17 PM
-5

What are you asking?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 06:59 PM
-1

There's no more confrontation since /u/nicejumper conceded.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 06:58 PM
-11

The evidence indicates that that is a much lower priority criterion for pair bonding for females.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 06:24 PM
-1

I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:50 PM
-3

your attempts at emotionalization are futile.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:48 PM
-1

It's rational, because pair bonding with a promiscuous female has a much higher potential cost to a male than the reverse does to a female.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:47 PM
-4

I answered your question concisely and correctly. You clearly have no response, and your attempts at emotionalization are futile. I accept your concession.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:44 PM
-14

You asked what women value in male sexual partners, and their mate selection strategy, as observed in the wild, clearly demonstrates that they value providers.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:42 PM
-62

You don't know why Kegels were invented.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:41 PM
-15

That's not the analogy, you dumb fuck. The analogy is two cars (or two females), one more valuable than the other, demanding the same price.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:33 PM
-70

The firmness of their bodies, the tightness of their holes, and their ability to commit.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:31 PM
-10

If you're offended by facts, the facts are not at fault.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:30 PM
-7

The analogy includes its own explanation. Females are the gatekeepers to sex in society, thus, they are analogous to locks.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:29 PM
-13

As a symptom of an underlying cause.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:25 PM
-4

have i been operantly conditioned? :p Yes. Through the punishment of shame and the reward of an easy life leeching off of your male partner.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:21 PM
-13

The OP, to my understanding, does not have sex with men, so he does not evaluate men as sexual partners at all. You would have to ask your question of females, and they would tell you, without exception, that they prefer a man who can provide. In fact, don't even ask them, just observe their mate selection strategy in the wild. That's how you'll get the most accurate answers.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:19 PM
-24

You summarized the OP's point so well. Why do you insist on not understanding it?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:14 PM
-9

It's accurate per the point of similarity, which is the whole point of any analogy.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:13 PM
-14

every woman will look old and wrinkly eventually ... which is when you upgrade.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:12 PM
-14

a women with sexual experience will probably blow you And all your friends. And a bunch of other guys you don't even know. That doesn't work so well.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 05:11 PM
2

It's plain old defamation but crowdsourced defamation.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:54 PM
3

I like the part where she gets texts reporting infractions by the sorority's members. Who sends these texts? Why do they send these texts? It feels like the omnipresent cameras in 1984.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/13 06:03 PM
3

Um, she picked you up.
/r/seduction17/04/13 01:31 AM
-1

Your question's premise is false. Reddit overwhelmingly agrees with /r/MensRights. Only the female supremacist hate criminals at SRS-affiliated subreddits hate it, because /r/MensRights works to call out their bullshit at every turn.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 07:35 PM
-1

You're white in Asia. You don't have to do shit. As long as you don't murder a girl's family she will put out to you. And maybe even if you do.
/r/seduction05/04/13 01:11 AM
1

You've been evading the question of how you picked up the whores. That's because you haven't done shit, and that, in turn, is because you're a fattie.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/13 02:23 PM
-1

With each passing year, the wife and I have steadily gained weight. Get the fuck out of here, you fucking loser.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 11:51 PM
-4

Under the conditions you describe, your story is entirely implausible, fattie.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 08:43 PM
-2

Quite the opposite, actually. I challenged you to explain the specifics of an entirely implausible scenario you proposed, and you completely failed to deliver.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 08:11 PM
-1

Nope. You spewed bullshit, I called it out. It's right there on the record as anyone reading this thread will see.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 07:29 PM
0

Reality check here. You got your bullshit called out.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 07:17 PM
-1

You're so full of shit.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 05:28 PM
-2

Still waiting for you to describe the specifics of your success with women.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 03:25 PM
-1

He's a reforming fattie, but he's far from ideal.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 01:19 PM
0

I want you to explain to us where you found the kind of women that you describe given your physical description and your logistical difficulties. You must have some kind of breakthrough system that overcomes all of these challenges.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 02:37 AM
-2

No you're not.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 01:56 AM
-6

I asked him, not you.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 01:23 AM
-4

Where do you find these women?
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 12:32 AM
-2

It's a peer-reviewed and published study. Its methodology was verified and found to be valid, which is how it got published. It's true. You're a misandrist, so you don't have any say on this topic, anyway. You should just shut up.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 12:09 PM
1

Game is all about making so-called luck a consistently repeatable and externally modelable phenomenon.
/r/seduction30/03/13 01:40 AM
-5

For example, Gina gets drunk and a man takes advantage. No, he was drunk, too, so she took advantage.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 02:28 PM
0

OP will surely deliver.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 02:27 PM
-10

90% of rape accusations are false (Stewart, 1981).
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 02:26 PM
3

Feminazis are going to totally rape her for being reasonable.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 04:19 PM
-1

You're asking for sources. You're saying that my argument is invalid because I am parroting back what other people said (citing sources). You're contradicting yourself. You lose. This argument is over.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:46 PM
-1

What are sources? Sources are the parroting of things one has heard elsewhere. Even you are self-conflicting. Thank you for proving my point.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:05 PM
5

Academic research has objective metrics. Sarkeesian's work doesn't qualify. It's underresearched, self-conflicting, assumes the premise, and in general is bigoted. It's worse than worthless.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:56 PM
7

Certainly not anything worth $160000. Much better YouTube videos are available for free.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:35 PM
30

We have Anita Sarkeesian to thank for these copycats. She demonstrated that there's money in crowdfunding misandry. Now every unemployed feminazi cunt is jumping on the bandwagon.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:20 AM
1

This entire post of yours is a denial of a well-ordering of intelligences, contradicting with your earlier assumption of it. We're done here.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:46 AM
1

The criterion is intelligence. Earlier, you made a post that necessitated an assumption of a well-ordering of intelligence among people. Later, you made a post denying this assumption. You contradicted yourself. Called out.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:35 AM
1

If you hadn't believed that people could be well-ordered by intelligence, you couldn't have called /u/JabCross stupid, because you wouldn't have believed in any metric that would have enabled you to do so. Called out again. This is too easy.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:24 AM
1

Oh, that. I shut you down by preventing another one of your amateur attempts at derailing. You called /u/JabCross stupid and stated that you couldn't understand how they could be so stupid. I pointed out to you (not in so many words, but I'll explicate here) that if you were smarter than them, you would be able to simulate the workings of their mind in your own mind, and that if you could not do this, you are necessarily more stupid than them. This is what this subthread is about and you will no…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:03 AM
0

Point out any specific snide thing you've said so far, and I'll describe the specific method by which I shut it down. Normal people figure these things out on their own, but I understand you have special needs.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:52 AM
-1

You can't even say snide things because I shut them down.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:37 AM
-1

I'll tell you what's pathetic. If you think you're going to succeed at derailing with these amateur tricks, that's pathetic. Don't ever make a claim you're not prepared to defend. You've just been called out again.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:49 AM
-2

Then you're even more stupid than whoever you're calling stupid. Think about it.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:10 AM
3

I don't think that phrase is about date no-shows, specifically. I think it's a metaphor about men's unwillingness to enter into emotional and marital commitments with women -- whenever and on whichever terms the woman desires, of course.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:05 PM
8

Bullshit. The first programmer was Charles Babbage. He designed the whole damn computer from scratch, of course he would know better than anyone else how to program it. However, he happened to be fucking Ada Lovelace at the time, and so he gave her trivial little programming exercises to humor her, the way one might a sprightly child. The length to which feminists will pervert this historical curiosity is beyond ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:10 AM
-9

She's not even legit black. She's half white and half black. She's a fucking Oreo cookie. You can get those at the supermarket by the case. What's the big deal.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter