TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

stupidname91919 Archive

View 1 posts and 184 comments by stupidname91919 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Activism/Supportstupidname91919/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Did you grow up in the 1950's dude? That era is long dead.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 01:49 PM
1

The news media is an industry of grievances. They get increasingly smaller as the bigger issues got solved. Whats the number of homeless in the U.S.? Its like 1,500,000? The big issue according to newspapers is maternity leave.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:07 AM
2

Any PhD-granting degree has to have a journal to publish new material and conduct peer-review. I think the core of feminist ideology exists around their academic journals. You're right that its centralized. Very centralized, they have formal and informal networks to support them since its a mantra for the left to organize.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 01:05 AM
5

Good, some justice is forthcoming.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:52 AM
1

Laugh at it. Don't engage in their nonsense as if it deserves any degree of serious consideration. Point out that it is nonsense. Do not debate as that would give their ideas more gravity than it deserves. Point out that hate speech is a crime in many jurisdictions, and that you would not want your opponent to have a vehicle, or any other platform for their hate speech. This nonsense will exist only for as long as it gets perpetuated. Its really fitting that online, the word viral gets used for …
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:51 AM
0

I can't answer for other peoples religion, only my own.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:43 AM
1

You are completely wrong. Its a requirement at 8 days.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:37 AM
-3

You don't get to have an opinion on how other people raise their children. Like, you do in the sense where you can opine, but you can't seriously suggest stopping others from practicing their religion. Thats absurd and would never be legally enforceable in the U.S.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:35 AM
0

The malice is intentional. Every lazy defense lawyer, overzealous prosecutor, and activist judge wants future clients. If that requires that children are beaten, then it results in children being beaten.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 08:39 PM
4

This is how advocacy used to work. People would sign up for newsletters at like $5.00/month and once a month, the advocacy group would publish a few pages of their accomplishments. Then the fax machine was popularized and that model began to fall apart. People then started fax circulars, and publishing stuff on bbs's. Since internet use is free the cost of communication is too low to get anything done.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 09:10 PM
2

Get it printed as good quality, and glossy. Something slightly larger than standard paper. Remove watermarks you don't want and put in one you do want.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:51 PM
1

This story, and the others like it always rubbed me the wrong way. I just have a hard time articulating why.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:49 PM
0

Thats a nicely editorialized headline OP.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:19 PM
5

He's running for something, so its just pandering to who he thinks his base is.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:17 PM
1

At the very least, the women get to see some sort of restitution, because their problems matter.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:58 AM
1

They somehow managed to transplant shoulder chips.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:56 AM
3

Coffeehouse/bar meetups would be the first thing I would both suggest, and be able to participate in.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:07 PM
1

Don't play the game of defining things in your worldview by the distinctions of an outsider group.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:58 PM
2

Its a very obnoxious way of writing a headline.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:21 PM
3

I always picture flying monkeys when someone asks me to imagine something.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 06:03 PM
1

The contrapositive is true. Because it is religious, it is not abusive.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 04:02 AM
1

I am not going to read your shit.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:33 PM
1

Religious freedom does matter, its literally embedded into the laws of our nation. You are in no place to demand others stop practicing their religion.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:33 PM
1

Why then care about the law? Act on your beliefs if you have them.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:46 PM
1

This is a very cynical response I have, but here goes. Pew Research shows that there is a huge glaring ideological divide in the U.S. where voting patterns are directly related to race and gender. This was a deliberate attempt by the Democratic and Republican parties to maintain their bases of power. As a group, the most loyal Democrats are black women and the most loyal Republicans are white men. Each political party caters services to their respective power-base. So you now have city centers t…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:44 PM
1

DO you believe in the Aztec religion? You don't. I've said before that hypotheticals are stupid. You don't believe anything, so you are in no place to act on beliefs that you don't have.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:36 PM
1

What makes you so hostile to logic and reasoning?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:28 PM
1

You obviously can't harm your child. You can only do things that help them, such as fixing a cleft palate, braces, circumcision, vaccination, removing tonsils, or giving them ear piercings. Thats a general rule. When it comes to faith, we in the U.S. have a system that maximizes religious freedom. Now, your idiotic hypothetical does not apply in this scenario since you are secular, so you do not have a faith. And you were not commanded to remove eyeballs. And also, removing eyeballs is detriment…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:24 PM
1

Stop making shit up.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:28 PM
1

Religious freedom is a human right.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:05 PM
1

I think it is negotiable. You get 90% of what you wan without any special effort if you choose to leave religious people alone.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:08 AM
1

Americans don't want a government thats capable of forcing people not to practice their religion.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:55 AM
1

You do care about it. You're trying to impose on me. That will not be allowed to happen.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:49 AM
1

I take issue with your first statement, it is not harmful, it is a spiritually uplifting act. As to your second statement, abortion is still a 50 state fight. It takes continuous funding drives to keep Planned Parenthood open in most states. Its extraordinarily expensive.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:47 AM
1

But again, what you are suggesting is harm.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:14 AM
1

They will not stop trying. Ever.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:12 AM
1

Thats not true.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:09 AM
1

I have a commandment from G-d. Its clear that you are the one that is objectively in the wrong.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:03 AM
1

They shouldn't have to bake that cake. People don't need to accommodate secular nonsense. That ruling will be overturned.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:02 AM
1

Jews and Muslims are a minority in the U.S. that is true, but the communities are also concentrated in areas where they can effectively get political representation. The MRA is not in that same position. You realize this. You're trying to start a social conflict with people who have not done anything against you and are not allowed to back down from opposing you. Thats not just unethical, its also bad tactics.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:59 AM
1

I don't care what Muslims do. They too have first amendment rights. You do not want to prevent child abuse, you want to prevent the exercise of a religious ritual, and you will not get what you want. You don't have any tools to get it either. You also do not get to ask for anything.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:55 AM
1

Nice compound statement. Making it look as if I said children are property when I did not. It is not only my religion, it is that of my infant son. You are in no place to prevent any rituals. You don't have any tools for it either.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:52 AM
1

Thats backwards thinking. Politics and representation require big tents. You can't be small and antagonize people and also expect change.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:44 AM
1

I don't need to. Letting you talk yourself into self-sabotage works.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:25 AM
1

Stop trying to sabotage Mens Rights with unnecessary fights against religious groups. Nobody needs that.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:07 AM
1

Hypotheticals are stupid and pointless.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:05 AM
1

Have you suffered a stroke?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:04 AM
1

Its clearly unethical to prevent people from practicing their religion. I don't understand why that would be a question.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 04:02 AM
1

Too far. Anyways, calling someone elses beliefs irrational is not polite, and a terrible way of building support.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:32 AM
1

I am not suggesting it; I am stating it.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:26 AM
1

You need to reread the Constitution. Its very clear.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:23 AM
1

How do I get it through to you that your thinking is incorrect and needs to be adjusted?
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:52 PM
1

I am urging any lurkers to chime in and explain to this person why his thinking is wrong.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:42 PM
1

Under the Constitution, I am entitled to practice my religion.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:41 PM
1

So you see the parallel. Good. It just ends up making the lawyers money. This is what I mean by needless antagonization, and ideology. You get 90% of what you want by leaving religion out of it.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:41 PM
1

See, this is bad marketing for your idea. You don't make friends talking like an idiot. Try talking less like an idiot. You will appeal to people outside your group more that way. You are a fringe group. Coming across as overtly antagonistic is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:11 PM
1

Marketing applies to everyone. They wouldn't do it if it didn't work. There is no inherent reason for MRA's to hate anyone. They are not required to think dogmatically. They basically have two choices in how to go forward. Forming a coalition that talks to states surgeons-general to stop routine hospital circumcisions would get them 90% of what they want at a low cost. Or they can demand a legal blanket ban on all circumcision. This necessitates legal fights, social battles, protesting, and it g…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:59 PM
1

There is a class of marketers that will say that there is no such thing as negative attention. I disagree with them. I think its not a good idea to needlessly antagonize people.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:54 PM
1

My suggestion is to not criticize religious circumcision as that would humiliate the MRM and bring in unwanted and negative attention.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:25 AM
1

I'm not. So its not a problem, Einstein.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:53 AM
1

It's not a requirement. Thats objectively wrong. Its a tenant of my faith. I have to do it. If you were required to cut your daughter's genitals would you do that as well???!!! I wasn't.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:12 AM
0

Why is it any different. The infant is in no position to consent, and if given the option will anyways pick the option that is acting in their best interests.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:13 AM
1

I will perform the requirements of my religion, and I will not be stopped.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:12 AM
106

Clinton isn't a feminist, she is an opportunist. But she does share their tendency to lie, and to make decisions based not on ideology but instead on maximizing power.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:57 PM
1

Nobody advocates mutiliation. That is not a thing. But Islam and Judaism require circumcision.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:43 PM
1

Its not good. They're attacking religion. That is not a good thing.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 03:33 PM
1

You THINK you are angry. Even your anger is completely disjointed, and in confusion. You need to sort this out because there is no reason for your anger to involve me. You don't even know me.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:24 PM
-4

Are you being serious? Read a fucking book.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:32 PM
-1

This is how a value system works. Its not just a preference. It displaces all other value systems. So, yes I do believe that it is more important than a mans own body, especially since he already consents to the practice by dint of being born into his religion.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:33 PM
0

G-d said so very clearly in the Bible. We (you are not part of we) are required to perform self-improvement and circumcision is the first step.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:31 PM
-4

Can you make an argument that isn't bullshit sophistry.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:29 PM
-1

What is your source that it was changed? I have never heard of such a thing. To my knowledge, circumcision has not changed at all since Abraham. Here is what I actually am frightened of. We had on-again off-again wars against the Greeks for like two or three hundred years over circumcision. It shouldn't have to come to that again. And that ended as the Greeks dropped polytheism and adopted monotheism.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:28 PM
-10

What makes you think the infant isn't interested in their religion? If they're Jewish, they have a Jewish soul. If Muslim they have a Muslim soul.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:21 PM
0

If you displace your anger regarding your parents onto people who are not your parents, you actually are confused.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:19 PM
0

They do have religion. A baby born to a Jewish mother is Jewish. A baby born to a Muslim father is Muslim. A baby born to a Christian father is Christian. This is the belief held by Jews, Muslims, and Christians respectively. Again, regarding your secularism. You don't get to impose it. I am religious, there are no circumstances that will change that. I will practice my religion without consideration or validation from you or others like you.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:18 PM
1

Oh, we supported that? When did Muslim/Jewish interest groups do that? Your doctor did it, displace your anger there.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:13 PM
-2

But I do. They're my sons. I get to act in their self-interest.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:12 PM
0

People don't do it because its popular. They do it because they were commanded by G-d to do it.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:11 PM
-2

Thats a bullshit sophist argument and you know it.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:10 PM
-9

That is not how the word secularism is commonly used. Also, the initial argument is disingenuous. Attacks on circumcision are attacks on religious practice.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:08 AM
-12

Popularity doesn't make you right. Make no mistake about this. You get to be secular. I don't want to force you into anything. But you do not get to force secularism onto others.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:04 AM
3

If it comforts you at all, this exact situation was predicted when they were considering the ERA. If history is any indication the next step will be to declare bathrooms to be unisex, and remove urinals.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:16 AM
4

It isn't. Brings up way more news stories for the same search terms.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:09 AM
-26

Its wrong to impose your secularism onto people who are not interested in it.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:06 AM
-6

Circumcision doesn't help the vast majority of baby boys it's done to. Thats because its done to boys who don't need it. There are only three groups of boys that need to be circumcised: Muslims, Jews, and boys at risk of phimosis (or some similar medical requirement). If your argument were that it was done only when required it would be acceptable. But your argument demands that it not be done even when required, which is a problem. You need to change your opinion to avoid creating a problem whe…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:19 AM
-1

I never did anything to you. Please leave me alone. Can you at extend to me that courtesy?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:31 AM
-3

You're conflating two dissimilar things. You're justifiably angry at your parents. We did nothing to you. This is a bit like projection. You are confused, and you think you are angry with us when that is not the case. Please displace your anger elsewhere.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:30 AM
-8

Ok, let me make my first point more clear since you seem to have misunderstood it. Circumcision is like vaccination or removing a cleft palate in that you are helping your child before your child consents to the procedure. In religious law, you are obligated to help a person when they are not aware that they can come at a loss without your intervention. That statement makes perfect sense. Yes, my religion requires I circumcision my sons. That is not a question or an issue. Its not under any disp…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:56 AM
-10

Attacking people who never harmed you makes you a jerk. None of these people did anything to you. They don't even know about you. Why would you go out of your way to support causing driving their religious practices underground? It makes no sense to say its harmful. If anything, circumcision is like vaccination, or removing a cleft palate, in that you do not need the infants permission to act since he would resent his parents for not helping him earlier. Also, your second paragraph is difficult …
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:05 AM
-8

To the idiots of the sub that think this is a good thing: Using demographic weight to drive religious practices underground makes you an asshole. Being an asshole to people who have not bothered you and have no intention of bothering you is not a good thing.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:15 AM
-47

Every time a title requests I use my imagination, I downvote it.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 03:37 AM
8

Trans-rights were the best thing to ever happen to the MRA. People take their needs seriously.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 06:01 AM
-3

Thats not your place to say. Do you not realize that?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 01:25 AM
-2

And you're the one who admitted to me point blank in a PM that you're not an MRA, you're only here to stir up shit.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:24 PM
-2

Well I agree with you in that respect. It shouldn't be done for cosmetic purposes.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:31 AM
-1

You're neither clever nor profound. I chose my value system and you chose yours. But yours will not override mine. That will not happen.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:51 AM
-13

Its absurd you don't realize how broken and backward your thinking is.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:44 AM
-32

Scream to netflix how much of a loser you are.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:38 AM
1

Thats where I got it from.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:15 AM
50

There's a word in Russian that escapes me at the moment for when an individual is so entrenched inside a system that they cannot see outside of it. Your cousin is the embodiment of that situation. He himself supports and enforces a value system that treats him and other men as less than equal, and he can't even escape it.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 10:00 PM
3

I'm beginning to think the femail section of dailymail is mocking their readership.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:59 AM
-11

How about I just let you talk?
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:27 PM
-13

The anti-circumcision lobby presents far dumber arguments. Some are mind-blowingly idiotic.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:06 PM
11

Well, find a way to take them to court.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:04 PM
19

Straight women already invite themselves to gay bars. Its the strangest, most tonedeaf thing, really.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:03 PM
3

This is a sub of disparate individuals with no centralized or collective views.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:01 PM
14

No. Find a way to take them to court about it.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:00 PM
9

There was no other way to spin this shooting. She checked off all the wrong boxes.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:58 PM
19

Stealth incest makes it harder to detect. I was always suspicious about the 15% claim in textbooks, since social workers, teachers, and others tend to hand-wave away cases of inappropriate behavior by adult women.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 03:34 AM
1

If anything this is an example of how institutions fail to hold girls accountable to even minimal standards of behavior. Schools get to set the dress code. Students are aware of it from day one. If they still can't follow rules they should, in theory be treated as harshly as rule violations that are targeted towards boys.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:57 PM
-15

They're not just disgusting, they're also assholes.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 08:25 AM
1

Audio podcasts usually are terrible but this is an exception.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:38 AM
1

If they don't share my values, its because they are confused. They would only think they are resentful out of confusion, and not from any genuine feelings of it. Religious practices have to adapt and reform for modern times, whether they are Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or any other religion. If it adapts or changes, its not a value, its a preference. I don't view religion as a preference. I also ascribe to what I imagine you would view as a narrow definition of what constitutes a legitimate mains…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:52 PM
1

I can assure you there are people working to fix that. Russian Jews were subject to inhumane practices by the Soviets, and there are ongoing efforts to remedy that through education and advocacy programs. I don't know anything about the situation among Swedish Jews, so I will take the most charitable assumption that they are mistakenly identified as Jewish. If it is made illegal and you don't comply with the law, you will either be fined or imprisoned, just like you would be if you cut into a li…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:08 PM
1

You may have a misunderstanding of how the law works in the U.S. We have a concept here that legal precedent is followed until it is overturned. So far, the idea that parents can circumcise their boys has not been challenged successfully. I've heard cases being brought to court, but I am not aware of a any rulings coming from that that ban the practice. If my religion dictates something, I will do it. Bringing up retarded hypotheticals does not make some case for you, you have to give stronger a…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:04 PM
1

If your interpretation of your religion (which not all members of your religion share, btw) calls for the mutilation of infant genitalia, then I am obligated to fight you as well. Its not an interpretation, its a universal practice. There is literally zero dissent on this in recognized mainstream groups. You can fight this, but you will lose, because even if you make it illegal (you wont) we will still not comply with the law. Its so bizarre that you presume to know anything about my religion. Y…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 04:59 PM
1

No they don't. They literally don't. Read the Constitution. Religious freedom takes precedence in the U.S.. You statement isn't true. And holy shit, I don't think you understand satanism if you think thats how they think. Anton Levays book is freely downloadable as a .pdf and it isn't a long read. Try to make non-retarded arguments.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 03:57 PM
3

Ignoring their nonsense is one of the better tools available.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:14 AM
1

If you don't support men being able to decide for themselves how much of their genitalia they get to keep, you don't support men's rights. You don't get to make the distinction of what I support. Thats completely out of your place. I can support things at my choosing and the degree to which I do it, I have no obligation to kowtow to your stupid ideological orthodoxies. You also have no place telling me what I care about. And for everyone else, this is the perfect example of a guy who is too fuck…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:27 AM
1

Its a weird thing, but generally when a parent kills their child, its mothers killing sons and fathers killing daughters. One of those rule-of-thumbs you learn reading psychology research papers. Another one is that children raised by abusers will grow up to be abusers if they were abused by a father and grow up to be abused when abused by a mother.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:55 AM
1

They aren't wrong. MRA's are completely pants-on-head retarded for attacking religious circumcision. How much of an idiot do you have to be to wade into an unwinnable fight? Guys here know they wont get the Constitution to change, but that wont stop them from keeping advocacy stupid instead of smart.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:47 AM
1

Women control 67% of consumer spending; if that isn't already clearly reflected in media content and advertising to you, I dunno what to tell you. I also don't think voting will do anything since the vote was stolen from millions of men for trivial issues by millions of women on juries. The two weak points I see in the establishment are ideology and legal challenges. Feminists don't believe in anything so they do not have the tools to attack a sound ideological stance. Just drafting and redrafti…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:52 AM
11

The day that the MSM tries to parrot back MRA slogans is the day I hang it up, and stop paying attention. I will not be co-opted.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 09:46 PM
0

Controlling sex is a means to power. For this guy and the government. The general push for punishing trafficking, I believe is a cynical attempt to punish buyers of sex, and instead of punishing sellers, in their place to punish Whatever guy they can find in place of the seller.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:59 AM
1

Always from the UK.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:14 PM
2

If you go to researchgate or any other site with tons of scholarly articles, you will find tons of articles, original research, evidence, etc., all stating that women are more suggestible than men. Not a whole lot, but enough for advertisers to realize that hawking new fashion trends to women is easier. The media knows this, so they frequently hawk ideas to women, and repeat it so many times that women and men begin to believe those ideas are their own. My intelligent sister for instance only re…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:09 PM
2

I never thought about it in those terms before.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 12:07 AM
1

So you wanna ban a religious practice. This is what makes you an idiot. You will not win in court. You even know you will not win, and yet you persist with stupidity. Between an attainable goal and an unattainable one, you choose the unattainable choice. This is not a scenario where absolutism works.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 12:07 AM
1

Thank you for reframing what I said in a completely different manner than how I intended to sound. You have 3 choices, and yes, I am reframing for you. Each choice comes with a likelihood of an outcome. MRM groups can try to ban circumcision. This will fail no matter what since you are unlikely to get a Constitutional Amendment. Religious people will always challenge it, in perpetuity as long as you can afford it. This is the absolutist option. This is also the stupid option. MRM groups successf…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 10:29 PM
0

Where do vagina hats fit into this? What makes you think I even have a stance on FMG? For all you know, I am ambivalent on that issue.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 09:41 PM
-1

Judging by the rest of this sub, you have a ton of absolutists who want the practice banned altogether, and are far too stupid to realize that that would go to the Supreme Court, and lose, no matter what. Religion is too popular in the U.S. to be challenged by these morons. Absolutism gets you nothing in this scenario. And, again, judging by the responses I've had on this sub, people here seem to think that absolutism is preferable to the attainable goal of talking to a few states-attorney gener…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 09:40 PM
-28

If I see a group of idiots, I will point out that they are idiots.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 01:15 PM
2

This isn't the first, or last time a woman murdered a black man and got no punishment for it.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 12:16 PM
-36

What a bunch of idiots.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 10:48 AM
1

We are maybe 15 years from high school locker rooms being co-ed.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:52 PM
1

You don't get to make that distinction.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:47 AM
0

You don't get to decide what I care about. And if you insist on marginalizing something I do care about, there's an auto-erotic act you can go perform.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:07 AM
1

See what I mean everyone. Full of retards.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:58 AM
-2

There are so many retards on this sub its unbelievable.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:35 PM
-1

The reference to Art of War was when Sun Tsu mentioned that its not a good idea to fight unless you know you're going to win. The U.S. Constitution explicitly protects the right to freedom of religion so its not a clear case that you will win in the courts. Going into a fight where the outcome is uncertain is just not smart. Now, you look at it this way. An attainable goal that has precedent exists. It involves soft pressure on a few groups that are gatekeepers in the medical field. It doesn't i…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:40 AM
-3

You're taking a completely winnable issue, and tossing it in the interest of ideological consistency. When the gays started organizing in the 70's, they were able to successfully fight the DSM to change homosexuality to no longer be a psychological disorder. They created the perfect mold on how to identify and rally to a cause that has very few people who need to be persuaded. Thats a very attainable goal. You can convince just a few doctors on a few boards that its unnecessary surgery and get 8…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:03 AM
1

That doesn't happen. They actually like being circumcised since they are happy to be fulfilling the will of G-d, they are just confused about not liking it.If the confusion were to be taken away from their minds, they would agree that they're happy about it.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 06:51 AM
1

Their soul was created by G-d, so they're already in agreement over circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 06:41 AM
1

Read The Art of War, so you can realize why its not a bright idea to throw yourself into an intractable unwinnable fight, then fuck off. Or fuck off first. I don't care.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 06:39 AM
1

See everyone, see what I mean? Look at the above comment, that is exactly the kind of comment I want you to recognize as stupidly antagonistic and unhelpful. The rest of you gotta chime in when someone does this and tell him that he is being unnecessarily divisive on a fringe issue.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:54 AM
1

No, he takes this stance because he is religious and makes a distinction between ritual, which you have no right to comment on or change, and medical procedure, which you have every right to attempt to influence. MRA's gotta make a big tent and that isn't going to happen if you antagonize people like me who would otherwise support you. If I agree with 99% of what you say, but 1% is an attack on my religion, I have an obligation to fight you with every fiber of my being for the rest of my life. I…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:18 AM
1

I don't think its genital mutilation. Now, if you wanted to make a strong case for yourself, you would instead say its unnecessary surgery, and that argument would have merit. And building on this, if you also said that unnecessary surgery should not be covered by insurance, or that the risk of complication versus the benefits make it a poor decision those would also be strong, valid arguments. Or, if you instead made the argument that since women themselves understand what its like having a pen…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:36 AM
1

This remains the dumbest issue the media convinced mra's to adopt. Whoever convinced you this is a good topic did so to stifle acceptance of other topics and it serves only to marginalize future acceptance.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 02:34 AM
1

Background checks are nearly universal, even at gunshows. I've seen them myself. You can buy a gun unless you have a felony. The restriction on ownership is if and only if someone has a court ordered psychological commitment in a facility. They want control. They want peoples means of self defense to be removed. They want to create a hierarchy where they are at the top and everyone else is at the bottom. They want to commit acts of violence against innocent people without fear of retribution. An…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:08 PM
2

Articles like this that try to rewrite the past always make me vaguely uneasy. Deep male friendships used to be more common even up to the 50's. Whats changed since then is that church attendance has gone down along with mens social clubs. Also a certain class of people who are unpopular here begin suing for admittance and that killed that.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:15 PM
2

A human being is not a prop. In media like this, a consistent theme plays out where these women seem to want people in their lives like they are things. If she goes that route, a baby born to a single mother will live its life out inside the ego of its mother, but a man with good self-esteem isn't going to go the same route.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:49 PM
17

When feminists lie, call them out. The strongest weapon in fighting them is the truth.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 04:40 AM
0

Their ideas only have as much currency as you accept from them. So, don't give them the power of language, don't repeat their trite slogans or come up with slightly different versions of the same. Feminists are radioactive, you limit your exposure to them to avoid being sickened.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 04:39 AM
-6

Because he paid for promotion. He's trying to sell you his book.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:35 PM
1

Its amazing to me how courts are so willing to forgo logic, and basic humanity by putting children in the control of known abusers. Ideological consistency is a powerful force, I get that. But still; they're children. Being beaten by a woman doesn't hurt any less.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:59 PM
1

Joining a hierarchy that intends to put you on the bottom is stupid. Its like intentionally joining a pyramid scheme at the base. Male feminists want the rest of us to join their schedule of values, and I get how they want to belong to something bigger than themselves, but why would they think that anyone with good self-esteem would want to be like them. You read the menslib sub and its unsurprisingly full of guys that feel insecure in their masculinity, they say it themselves all the time. OP, …
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:56 PM
3

There are feminists like Amanda Marcotte that insist that a man who has been beaten down to the point of suicide is actually just abusive men performing one last act of violence at their exes.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:23 AM
16

It makes me profoundly happy that Asians do as well as they do in this country if for no other reason than the fact that they undermine all racial quota systems.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 03:31 PM
-4

I automatically downvote any titles that demands that I imagine anything. Its really really obnoxious.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:53 AM
82

These women are unbelievably selfish. Its galling. Really, whats the mental age at which you start being able to view things from other peoples perspectives, like 10? How does an adult not progress to that state?
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:32 PM
1

They lied to you because dishonesty is their currency. You finding out how unsubstantiated and outrageous their claims are is just deflation. You're discovering how worthless their currency is.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:59 AM
14

Reading some feminist studies phd papers was what made me realize how broken peer review is. It should be replaced by academic review.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:33 AM
6

When he was told to not cry over a bruised knee, who was it that told him that? A babysitter, a teacher, or his mother? In any case his socialization was directed by adult women for the benefit of other women.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:28 AM
3

You sorta can't. Women hold the majority of the vote since they live longer, and they more often live in more affluent areas. Democracy is dead. It died in court when millions of black men had their right to vote taken away by retired ladies on juries.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 01:31 AM
2

Stop asking me to imagine things OP, I have no imagination.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:18 PM
1

It must have been an ego-destroying moment when she realized she lost. To answer the poster above, I think the Democrats, if they're smart will try to run Chelsea Manning in 2020.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:24 AM
1

You're going to hear the exact same spiel in college. Its a mandatory attendance event. The purpose of these seminars is to demean you humiliate you and make you feel powerless inside the power-structure of the school you're in. My suggestion is for you to not let the degradation get to you. Don't try to reason with these people, it won't work. They're not going to change. Just realize that you are in a hostile environment and keep your guard up.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:21 AM
1

Look, to be successful in advocacy, you need to create a 'big tent' and thats not going to happen if people like you choose to make retarded arguments for retarded causes. The feminists are successful and they work with conservatives on causes that they have in common, like fighting pornography. You can't get anything done without a big tent. Its frustrating seeing you guys literally fighting to stay irrelevant. When you have a cause thats objectively stupid, like fighting circumcision, maybe sh…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 05:55 AM
1

Why take the antagonistic route?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 05:13 AM
1

Because its my child, and my decision. You don't have a voice in the discussion. There is no reasonable argument you can make where you can involve yourself in my religion, or my family. And just an an addendum, I am halfway convinced a spiteful marketer convinced MRA's to pick up this cause just to see how long it would take you guys to get back to your senses.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:58 AM
1

Because its a fucking retarded cause to champion. I get to practice my religion, and you get to shut the fuck up about it. You want to be an idiot who alienates potential supporters by fighting for marginal causes when there are enough real ones out there then you can sit at home and do nothing instead since antagonizing people is the opposite of advocacy.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 02:14 AM
5

Stories like this come out of the UK and Australia fairly frequently. Women who stab boyfriends, or even random men don't really get in any trouble for it. Its sick.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:54 AM
7

Worse yet is the fact that it becomes a positive feedback-loop for the courts. Women that are violent towards their children suffer no punishments, which increases the amount of child abuse. Its a sick sick system.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 09:05 AM
1

These classes are so humiliating. They exist just to humiliate freshmen.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 10:51 PM
3

I'm sure everyone experienced a few teachers like this that tried to harm boys to help girls. The ones I remember were more covert.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 02:34 PM
23

Thats about $550k too low. If they kick out a student for horseshit reasons, they should also have to pay the difference of lifetime earnings for college grads versus high school grads.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:51 PM
1

"Weeping Nazi" is the beginning of the title they choose to go with? If I didn't know better, I'd say that Salon is mocking Cantwell for crying even though their political camp is the one that says that men should be forced to be more like women. Thats dishonest of them, but not surprising since they decry hate groups, but quote David Futrelle who runs a literal hate blog.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:48 PM
1

Not a joke, there are so many more women living longer than men that feminists started a real, legally recognized campaign to brand the issue as elderly womens poverty. So men living a decade less than women is not a problem, but being poor in that decade is. Gotta thank societal standards.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:34 AM
2

I once tried to do research on child sexual abuse by women, and I don't believe the statistic that its only 15% of cases. They call it stealth incest, like sharing a bed with a child they molest in their sleep, or asking for help taking a bath. But the research is extremely limited, and vague. And on top of that, things that would get a man incarcerated tend to get explained away by women. It also does not help that the gatekeepers of safety for children are all women who receive zero instructio…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:26 AM
1

Its amazing to me how like 10% of 2xc is women trying to get a male coworker fired for saying a joke they didn't like.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:22 AM
9

What the hell? Why are 5 year old committing suicide?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:17 AM
1

Don't ask us, ask a court.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:43 AM
12

Its most hilarious how they shit on any woman who dares to be conservative.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:17 AM
3

I'm beyond the age where I can be drafted, but I want to prevent others from being drafted as well. I don't like the idea that its still a sex-segregated institution, and want something set up ahead of time to fight it.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter