TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

subjectiveoco Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by subjectiveoco on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think this qualifies her as a "father's rights" supporter. MRA is a much more broad category that includes other issues that remains to be seen whether she's in support or not.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:02 AM
1

HAHA
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:32 PM
1

Typical people in this subreddit- responding to a completely fair and valid discussion with profantiy, hyperbole, and name-calling. Whatever.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 09:02 PM
-3

Totally agree with this point. I'm not a MRA, but you guys are shooting yourselves in the foot by demonizing other social justice groups and setting yourselves apart from the umbrella of "social justice". Social justice is here to stay, it's not going to recede. People will not tolerate casual racism, sexism, or other types of prejudice now and especially in the future. If you set yourselves apart, you'll only alienate yourselves further. Feminists, critical race theorists, LGBT activists, etc, …
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:56 PM
5

Why is the word "hate" in quotations in this post's title? Is anyone on here happy for the people who had these images removed? Those images were misogynistic and horrific. Facebook already has a hate speech policy that censors similar content based on race and sexual nudity so this is completely within their already-established guidelines. If you don't want MRM to be seen as a misogynistic movement as people do already, you should be happy people are taking a stand against real hate. Those are …
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:27 PM
11

If you want Facebook to have the same sensitivity to your issues, take a page from those feminists who defended women and advocate your interests to Facebook yourself. Don't hold feminists in contempt if you think what they did for women should have also been done for men, do it yourself.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:22 PM
1

Never said men don't get raped. Never said society doesn't ignore men's problems. That's my whole point. I'm mocking you. Of course I'm being ridiculous by accusing you of leaving out women. That's what you're doing here to Takei. You can't criticize someone for not incorporating every issue relating to rape that you deem important in one fucking tweet. Much less call them a whore and a dumbass.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:57 PM
1

I understand what you're saying... it's like how people watch trashy TV shows, enjoy it, yet say they're above it. I get that. I don't think that's the case here. The general response to that book from women was revulsion. Not humorous bemusement, or half criticisms about how silly it was. People cracked down hard on this book in a serious way, not as a form of entertainment but a social issue that was dangerous and threatening. Many feminists said it set back women fifty years. They also insist…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:46 PM
0

Once again men are left out, AGAIN That statement left out any mention of women being raped! Now you're the one dismissing half the population and failing to address "all rape". See. In that one sentence, you could've addressed all rape, but you didn't. Once again women are left out, AGAIN. That's what you sound like.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:35 PM
6

This is seriously childish. If you, as a representative of MRM want to be taken seriously, don't insult a respected figure just because they haven't devoted special attention to your interests that you feel entitled to. He sends a tweet that shames victim-blaming of women (which is a real problem anyway) yet he doesn't mention men. All of a sudden he's "dismissing men" and being a "misandrist"? As much as this subreddit likes to accuse feminists of making every issue about themselves, people lik…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:25 PM
4

You're wrong. And fuck you. George Takei is a hero to LGBT people everywhere. He's stood up for so many causes, so many unfair and antigay laws. He's personally reached out to troubled teenagers who were on the verge of suicide and reassured them. He addresses every instance of antigay hate with scathing criticism and humor. He's stood with LGBTQ people longer than most people have been alive. Yet you insult him and call him a "total dumbass" and a "whore" just because he doesn't explicitly supp…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:12 PM
4

Yes I agree, some women do have those fantasies. I think the danger is to assume that because these romance novels with rape are so allegedly popular with women, a lot of women must fantasize about rape and violent tendencies within men. I also agree that there's a discrepency between what women say they want and what they actually want sometimes. But shouldn't you downplay these constructed rape fantasies to elevate the image of men... as well as preserving the sanity of women? I feel like that…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:55 PM
3

Only reason I added the 2nd part was because the OP post says, "If these scripts are written to women's tastes, what in the heck do they really want?" Is that the point of his post? It pretty plainly calls into question whether women have secret rape fantasies or inclinations toward aggressive, violent men?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:47 PM
-4

The book's financial success and vast readership does not say anything about people's opinions of the book. Pretty much all my female friends have read this book (some even bought it), and all of them hated it and pretty much only read the book to ridicule it. I'm pretty sure the reason this book became so popular was precisely because how vulgar everybody considered it to be, not because everyone thought it was so great. Also the writer that authored this article is ridiculous. She is speculati…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:44 PM
1

Are you seriously accusing feminists of celebrating the rapes of men? I'm sorry, this is just an act of libel and it's completely of line. You can accuse feminists of perhaps ignoring the problem of men getting raped, or you can accuse a specific group or instance in which this happend... but to just casually characterize feminists as pro-male rape, it's just stupid and inappropriate.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:13 PM
2

You can't bring into question the inner motivations of all women simply because these novels exist and target a small minority of women with shitty taste. I don't know any women currently who actually reads, much less take seriously, these kinds of novels. Also the feminist backlash to 50 Shades of Grey, for example, was enormous- they hated how misogynistic and rapey the sex passages were. Please, please, please... don't make this into something so that you can find justification that women wan…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:03 PM
1

I'm gay and I absolutely agree with that homophobic behavior is acted upon more commonly in men. This is personally true in my experience. And I don't think people can deny that overwhelmingly amounts of gay men tend to be more comfortable confiding in a woman than a straight men because of similar fears. This is not an attack on the character of ALL MEN. But simply I think gay men recognize that deviations from masculinity has more serious ramifications than deviations from feminity. People jus…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 06:07 AM
2

Don't know why this has so many downvotes but it's absolutely true that Tumblr appeals more the LGBTQ people and feminists, first of all. That's just a statement of fact, it's not trying to be contrarian against Men's Rights. Also I'm a gay, Asian man and I've never cringed more from casual racism on any mainstream website than Reddit.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:56 AM
1

The word "privilege" used in sociology has nothing to do with personal experience, it's just a word to describe unequal power distribution across society based on some factor of identity. When people say men or white people are "privileged", it means that gender or ethnicity is privileged, not necessarily all individuals who are men or white. The status of "white" and "male" are privileged. Also people can use the phrase "check your privilege" as a guilt trip. More serious people use the phrase …
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:41 AM
0

Government funding gets renewed through taxes, investments, and trade surpluses year after year after year. It makes money just like people do, it's just a matter of how the gov't allocates funds... so yes, I seriously do believe that. Now maybe please stop calling me a "fucking retard". I'm not trying to be an asshole to you, I'm only disagreeing with you. You only think I'm baiting you out, but I'm not. Whatever problem you have with me voicing my opinion is in your head.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:42 AM
4

If funding goes to only women's shelters, then it's a problem of implementation not of the law itself. Civil rights are not zero-sum, they are freedoms and norms that should apply to everyone. You are the one who believes MRM and feminism are locked in a zero-sum struggle-indicated by the fact that you say government funding isn't unlimited. I don't believe that. Gov't funding is renewable and potentially plentiful for everyone given practices of good governance are exercised. But if you view MR…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:26 PM
-3

VAWA does cover men: "Article Sec.(3)(b)(8), Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Act No. H. R. 3402 of 2005—Nothing in this title shall be construed to prohibit male victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking from receiving benefits and services under this title." The language of the bill (other than the title) never specifies these protections go solely towards women, instead it uses the word "person(s)" or the nongender…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:16 PM
1

Anybody who has actually read the Kanin report knows his study is vastly inadequate to make such a general statement about false rapes. His study only looked at 109 cases of rape. His sample size was limited to white, poor, poorly educated, mid-western women all living in one town. The town is unidentified in the paper so it's impossible for other scholars to verify his work. Regardless if it's accurate or not, that kind of mistake would be unacceptable in any study in any field, ever. He also m…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:00 AM
3

This is a direct consequence of patriarchy in its most virulent form, there's no way to get around get it. If you try to pin this on women or feminists or anything but cultural attitudes that put a explicit preference on sons over daughters, you are delusional. Please do not make any illusions about this problem. I'm Chinese, I've been in China. My whole family is there. This favoritism for sons is pervasive everywhere you go. Moreover gender imbalances never bode well for a society... it's usua…
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:51 AM
1

From what I've heard from many feminists, prostitution is a highly debated issue. There is unanimous opinion among feminists that prostitution should be illegal. Many feminists realize the some women will have no where to go if they can't turn to prostitution for money.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:37 AM
1

I was circumcised exactly one year ago. My frenulum is still intact. There's not much slack skin, there's no flabbiness at all. And both my doctors were American, however the urologist was Indian-American... not sure if he was ever educated outside the US but he had a perfect American accent. I'm aware that doctors in many parts of the world have little experience with circumcision because no one really circumcizes their infants in Europe, for example. That's why I'm surprised to hear you say th…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:38 AM
-2

I posted a comment already addressing the sex question and you're not going to like my answer. I chose to be circumcised at 20 years old to get rid of slight phimosis (when your foreskin is tight around your penis). I've had sex uncircumcised and after I was circumcised and I can honestly say: there is no difference. At all. And even though I had phimosis, it was very VERY slight and didn't affect the sex. In fact it was so inconsequential that my doctor told me it probably wouldn't even be qual…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:35 AM
2

I chose to be circumcised when I was 20 years old to get rid of slight phimosis. Honestly, there have been zero negative consequences- except for the bumpy recovery period, but that comes with any surgery. As a person who has experienced sex with and without foreskin, I'm telling you: it's the same. The orgasm is the same. Peeing is the same. Masturbation is the same. Sure male circumcision is mutilation, but it's not harmful... at all. Not only did I go through it as an adult which I doubt many…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:17 AM
0

I don't know a single lesbian that has ever expressed she categorically hated men. Using this kind of post to spread myths about American lesbians is just disrespectful and antagonistic. It's also not making the MRM any friends.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:58 AM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minority_group A minority group is a sociological category within a demographic. Rather than a relational "social group", as the term would indicate, the term refers to a category that is differentiated and defined by the social majority, that is, those who hold the majority of positions of social power in a society. Unless you want to debate the validity of modern sociology, you should at least know what certain terms mean. The word "minority" has almost nothing to …
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:52 AM
2

Labelling a demographic as a minority has more to do with power dynamics than physical traits or numbers. I would say women are a "minority" given their status in the workplace, reproductive rights, and issues with sexual harassment and assault.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:21 AM
1

You sound as if you're saying circumcised men who are happy with their circumcision are deluded and don't know any better. I was circumcised at 20 years old, willingly. I had very slight phimosis (foreskin was too tight and wasn't easily retractable) so I opted to have the surgery done. During this time I talked to my urologist many times and did a lot of research... obviously went through with it first-hand. And frankly I don't understand the antagonism towards male circumcision. Please listen …
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:43 AM
-12

Sexual harassment is a huge factor in jobs relating to manual labor, construction, the oil industry, or any job with huge gender imbalances.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter